1 Find the output of the
following
circuit for the input
quantum
191927 1117
HIT
as
as
Bob share the entangled state
2 Alice and
AB 100 On the other hand
1
and Charlie share the entangled state
Alice
At 10 the entanglement
It Using
discussed in lecture 8 show
swapping protocol
as
measurement outcome her
that Alice's
if of
is 00 then Bob and
two qubits
charlie share the entangled pain I
does
3 Please explain again why entanglement
not allow instant communication between two
parties
4 Consider the operators
ma F
me
where
that and Mz can be measurement
show Me
operators for a
qubit
system is in the
say
the qubit initially pure
the outcome
state 1 7 I Find
and states after the measurement
probabilities
5 consider the operators defined by
F
mi ma
where
measurement
show that MI and ME can be
operators for a
qubit
system is in the
say
the qubit initially pure
the outcome
state 1 7 I Find
What will be the corresponding
probability P 1
state
comment on POVMS Mi Mi and
Ma Ma of the previous problem
problemsolvingsession
[Link]
quantum
the 1 output of
circuit for
the
the
following
input
191927 1117
HIT
as
as
9 117 92 117
ID
110
117 A
1
are
target 11 11
and Bob share the entangled state
2 Alice
AB 100 On the other hand
1
and Charlie share the entangled state
Alice
At 100 the entanglement
I Using
discussed in Lecture 8 show
swapping protocol
as
measurement outcome her
that Alice's
if of
is 00 then Bob and
two qubits
charlie share the entangled pain I
solution
É
I
Resulting state
AABC 1005A 1 8 101 1 5
lio PE
11174A 175
outcome her is
Alice's msmt
of qubit 00
A
No It It 1B 1C
ABC
The state 147 collapses to
tAt p lo probability of
i
getting the outcome 00
AABC AABC
p o notm
AA
Motmo I C IAA I It
AA
It It Mo
100 111 cool ill
1007 00 100 II 1117200
12 1117 ill
AABC
MIM µ
100 00 100 II 1 Cool 1117211
100 100 101 10,13C
A BC
1107 110
BC
111 AA 111
ABC
100007 1001 1 ooyAABc
AABC
11111
1007A 1117 10074 1117
Is
TIE
Bob and Charlie share the entangled
pain It
does
3 Please explain again why entanglement
not allow instant communication between two
parties
solution
H HA HB
P Pa
p I A e
local measurement on her subsystem
Alice performs
p p
[Link] P
mtQIb
HI
fIMcMI
Me I
Aliff [Link] BE
subsystem
composite system is prepared in p
that immediately after Alice performs
Assume
her msmt the relative state of Bob's
system is given by the partial trace
the overall state with respect to
of
Alice's system
trna P
c IHB Mct IHB
trna
Mic Ai Mict Bi
trna
te M Ai Mct Bi
III
to A Bi
tr Ai Bi
trna P
Bob cannot tell the
statistically speaking
between what Alice did and
difference
measurement or whether Alice did
a random
at all
anything
4 Consider the operators
ma F
me
where 1
2 can be measurement
Effectors for a
2T
system is in the
say
the qubit initially pure
the outcome
state 1 7 I Find
and states after the measurement
probabilities
POUI
p ti
outcome
prob of getting the
lpi
[Link]
of E decided by the fact
are
that p should behave like probabilities
E should be semi positive definite
[Link]
1 ta E P 1
P
1
[Link] Ei
If
Ei 1
[Link]
POUM E
[Link]
mim
matma F 1
MatMz I
So MTM
1 7 E
p i 1
II
P i tr p Mtm
emitm I
I tr emin I
p i
I
mi
e
me emit
11 3
171 6 10
can show
similarly you
p 2 to pMtMz 1
Its
5 consider the operators defined by
F
mi ma
where 1
2 can be measurement
Effects for amigo
system is in the
say the qubit initially pure
the outcome
state 1 7 I Find
What will be the corresponding
probability P 1
state
comment on POVMS Mi Mi and
Ma Ma of the previous problem
solution Mitmi I
nitmi 5
mini F
mitmi mitin's E I
Mi Mi are measurement operators
POUM
M1 Mz
mini poum
Mtm Mit m
and they constitute
the same
POUMS
PG to p mitmi
C
[Link] Ec
EC emitmi
IPCD If
[Link]
state after
mi
mirmit E E
post msmt state
e p 89
117211
72
Mi
11 7
Tft
Mi
6
10 EYE
f
10
IIIa
100 10 107
10
107 102
107 107T
107 D
07
107 ID 10071
IEEE 1
5 ion
[Link] E