Report on RPA Solution to solve Problem Title in:

Accounts Receivable (Collections and Payment Processing) in Retail

SYMBIOSIS CENTRE FOR INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGY
SYMBIOSIS INTERNATIONAL (DEEMED UNIVERSITY)

MBA(ITBM) - Batch 2024

Sem 3

Div B - Group No. 3

Name PRN Question Solved

Angshuja Sengupta 24030241057 1

Sharwari Amberkar 24030241056 2

Keira Ruth Lobo 24030241078 3

Khushboo Jangam 24030241076 4

Gopika Sathison 24030241069 5

Chinmaya Nande 24030241082 6

Padmashree Bhagate 24030241062 7

Q1. Identify and State clearly the End to End Problem Statement from
Accounts Receivable (Collections and Payment Processing) in Retail
which requires RPA/bot solution.

Accounts Receivable (AR) management in the retail industry is critical towards the maintenance of
liquidity, efficiency of working capital and healthy cash flow. AR activities span a wide range of activities,
such as the creation of invoices, tracking payments, sending payment reminders, medical bill reconciliation,
and updating of ERP/accounting systems. Nevertheless, the existing operations in most retail companies
are very manual and disjointed, resulting into inefficiencies, increased costs and lack of customer
satisfaction.

Accounts receivable (AR) Process Lifecycle.

The general AR cycle in retail endeavor is generally as follows:
● Customer Purchase and Invoice Generation - After a purchase has been made by a customer an
invoice is created and a specified time is set for payment.
● Payment follow-up - In case of unpaid invoices, personnel will manually activate reminders, e-mail
or phone.
● Collection of Payments through various channels - Customers can pay through various options
which include UPI, credit/ debit card, mobile wallet, bank transfer or cash.
● Payment Reconciliation - The manual matching of the incoming payments and the matching
invoices is done by the staff.
● Entry into ERP/Accounting System- Payments are entered manually in the ERP or accounting
system.
● Defaulter Escalation - The overdue accounts can be subjected to late fees calculation, escalation or
use of external collection agencies.
● This lifecycle shows that it is manually dependent at all levels, and hence, inefficient and
susceptible to error.

Business Issues
Retailers have a number of operational issues when dealing with AR:
● Late Collection: Invoices that are overdue deplete liquidity and limit the availability of working
capital and influence the operations of a business.
● Much Manual Labor: Employees waste time in unnecessary manual procedures like follow-ups,
reconciliation and data input.
● Data Entry Errors: Manual processing results in payment mismatch with invoices, resulting in
financial mismatch within financial records.
● Customer Dissatisfaction: Invoicing mistakes, or reminders delays, will lead to a bad customer
experience, which influences brand reputation.
● Expensive Collection Processes: The collection process is costly and inefficient due to the use of
manual labor to carry out the repetitive tasks.

1
Technical Issues
Besides operational issues, there are technical bottlenecks that have a great influence on AR management
of the retail industry:
● Absence of Integration with ERP Systems: Multiple channel payments are not integrated and, thus,
there is siloed data.
● Large Transaction Volumes: The volume of transactions in retail is too high to ensure manual
reconciliation is a practical and fast process.
● Legacy Systems: The old ERP and accounting systems do not have new APIs that can be readily
integrated with payment systems and automation tools.
● Minimal Analytics: The predictive analytics on customer payment behaviors are limited, making
retailers unable to act proactively on the risk management.
● Poor Communication Visibility: Customer interactions (calls, emails, reminders) are not well
monitored, and thus, they do not escalate and get resolved consistently.

Real-World Context
The AR-related inefficiencies are also experienced by global retailers. For example:
● Coca-Cola Enterprises and Marks and Spencer had a problem with manual tracking of invoices,
long reconciliation periods and increasing cost of collection.
● These organizations have tackled the challenges through implementation of Robotic Process
Automation (RPA) and smart workflow.
● The results were improved collections, accuracy, and less manual work and increased customer
satisfaction. This shows that the issue is not single but a common problem in the retail business,
which needs to be automated and integrated more intelligently.

The Accounts Receivable process in the retail industry is very important yet is marred by manual processes,
inefficiencies and limitation of technology. Such difficulties lead to a slow collection, increased expenses,
and unsatisfied customers. Retailers can achieve high AR performance, increase their cash flow, and
customer experience by studying the best practices in the world and integrating automation technologies,
such as RPA, AI-based analytics, and integrated ERP systems.

2
Q2. List alternative solutions to the above Problem besides RPA. Justify
why RPA/bot Solution is better than this alternative solution.
The framework of managing the accounts receivables and the realization of strategic activities in the field
of the retail industry, companies have a tendency to review numerous other methods that are offered to
enhance the work of the organizations and reduce their costs. As much as these remedies might provide
short-term relief, which is immediate, they do not address the issue of inefficiency that possibly lies behind
the error prone manual processes and above all they do not scale, and thus do not last long. Alternatives to
robotic process automation (RPA) developed more recently are outlined along with the related limitations
as follows:

1. Outsourcing Accounts Receivable to Third-Party Collection Agencies

Many financing companies have opted to outsource accounting receivable (AR) functions to third-
party collection agencies. This is often seen as a plan to cope with overdues and at the same time
minimize internal workload.

Limitations:

● High ongoing costs: The agencies of the third parties usually turn over every consignment
fee or offer a percentage of the corporation and can lead to considerable costs of work.
● Loss of control in customer experience: When leaving the control of the customer
reminder, collection, and follow-ups to third parties, companies are risking losing loyalty
to the brands. Violent collection methods can create client dissatisfaction.
● No process improvement: Despite the fact that recovery of payment watching processes
through third-party agencies can help secure payment recovery, they do not pay attention
to the existence of underlying inefficiency in AR processes (e.g. manual tracking, payment
reconciliation). As a result, these latent problems arise and repeat.

Example:
As it applies to global retailers, like Coca-Cola, the expenses of outsourcing triggered the
development of irregularities in communication with customers and the loss of follow-ups, which
eventually led the company to research budget automation.

2. ERP Upgrades or Custom Software Development

Retailers can use resources involving upgrading of the ERP solution (such as SAP or Oracle) as
well as development of custom-made computer applications that would help seek automated
specific accounts-receivable operations, namely invoice generation, subsequent mailing of a letter
of reminder, and reconciliation.

3
 Limitations:

● High initial cost capital requirements: ERP systems improvement or the creation of
customized solutions usually requires a significant amount of initial investment in capital
which gets amplified further by the high cost of implementation.
● Delays in the execution of software: The implementation of in-house software or the
upgrade of an ERP may take several months or even years, thus increasing the time before
the gains can be realized.
● Integration issues: The legacy systems often experience error and inconvenience in trying
to connect with newer payment systems (e.g., UPI, digital wallets) and integrating them
with third-party systems that work alongside.

Inflexibility: Custom made software may be highly insecure with regard to lack of scalability to
run at peak capacity; it could also be very expensive and time consuming to provide alterations on
such software to meet new business needs or changing payment systems.

Example:
Some of the challenges faced by Coca-Cola were in the modernization of its old systems. Despite
some improvements being realised, regulatory bodies noted that robotic process automation could
be used to assist an ERP system by streamlining the repetitive mechanisms without the need to
complete a complete IT revamp.

3. Expanding the Accounts Receivable/Finance Team

Because of a rising number of invoices and subsequent collections of payments, retailers often
increase their accounts receivable and finance staff. This growth is often accompanied by the hiring
of new employees whose role is to invoice and make follow-ups and perform reconciliation
services.

Limitations:

● Scalablity:: The solution of adding capacity to the work force to project growing levels of
accounts receivable may offer a short-term solution, but the increased demand is not
scalable especially in seasons with surges in demand.
● Higher labor expenses: Hiring, training, and retaining additional staff lead to higher
operational costs despite the fact that the two activities do not address the root causes of
inefficient operations.
● No improvements in error: Human induced errors such as; errors in data entry, forgotten
reminders, and incorrect reconciliations do not improve; thus, reducing the accuracy and
timeliness of accounts receivable procedures.
● Employee dissatisfaction: Manual tasks that require repetitive actions could lead to
burnout among the employees and make them have little morale that will ultimately reduce
productivity.

4
 Example:
Despite increasing the number of its people, Coca Cola still had to face the problems associated
with sluggish collections and additional cash-flow issues. The final implementation of robotic
process automation (RPA) ultimately limited the time spent on manual work, thus freeing up people
to devote their efforts to other more important tasks.

4. Shared Service Centres (SSC):

Sharing of services centres (SSCs) within the retail firm is often exercised in many low cost
economies to manage the invoice handling, payment follow ups, and reconciliations at a single
organisational scale. Realising cost-saving benefits due to economies of scale is the purpose of such
arrangements

Limitations:

● Labor-intensive: Even though operations have been located in SSCs, most processes are
still manual or semi-mechanised, and thus baffles the potential effectiveness improvement
that otherwise can be realised.
● High setup and transition costs: Infrastructure and training, as well as redesign of
processes, represent a significant startup and relocation cost to SSCs.
● Geographic limitations: In geographical factors, they may take longer time to respond to
payment related problems or customer queries, especially when it is business to consumer,
because of distance.
● No intelligent automation: Automation offered by SSCs is often basic; datings and error
reporting processes can take much longer to complete than what might happen with a robot
solution.

Example:
When it comes to major retail business enterprises, like Coca Cola, SSCs were implemented in the
finance department. However, still several issues were so overwhelming in terms of slow
reconciliations and manual handling of exceptions.

Why RPA is the Best Option

RPA also provides considerable benefits compared to the traditional approaches such as outsourcing, ERP
upgrades, or addition of more AR staff, as cost-efficiency, scalability, accuracy, and speed are the main
benefits of this technology. It enables businesses to automate rule-based activities, thereby making
operations faster, more precise with minimum interference.

5
Key Benefits of RPA Over Other Solutions:

Aspect ERP Outsourcing Shared Service AI/ML RPA

Automation to Third- Centers (SSC) Predictive (Recommended)
/ Upgrades Party Models
Agencies

Cost High High (ongoing Medium to High High Low to Moderate

(upfront & service fees) (infrastructure + (investment (quick ROI)
maintenance staffing) in data,
costs) tools,
expertise)

Time to Long (6–12+ Quick (but Moderate (3–6 Long (6– Moderate (4–8
Implement months) limited months) 12+ months, weeks)
control) data
preparation
needed)

Customer Neutral Risk of poor Neutral (still Neutral to Improved (timely,

Experience (back-end interactions manual-heavy, Improved accurate,
focused, less due to third- delays possible) (better customer-
impact) party handling insights, but friendly)
indirect)

Error Moderate Limited (errors Limited to Moderate to High (up to 99%

Reduction (depends on shift Moderate High accuracy)
design) externally) (manual input (depends on
persists) data quality)

Scalability Moderate Limited (fixed Moderate (needs High (but High (scales
(needs service extra depends on easily with
system contracts) staff/resources) clean data & demand)
upgrades) computing
power)

6
Process Yes, but slow No core Limited (focus Yes Yes (immediate,
Improvement and complex improvements on (predictive measurable
(just workload centralization, power, but improvement)
shift) not slow
transformation) adoption)

7
Q3. Describe RPA/bot Solution, systems, tasks, processes, logic step by
step, devices used for the above problem
Accounts Receivable (AR) is an important financial function for large enterprises. Inefficiencies such as
delays in collections, manual processing, and reconciliation errors can significantly impact both cash flow
and working capital. To address these challenges, a Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solution using
UiPath has been recommended. UiPath bots automate repetitive and rule-based processes, simplifying the
AR cycle and reducing human errors, and giving real-time visibility of the receivables.

The automation flow can be understood in seven steps, where each step replaces or augments a manual
activity with an automated one:

1. Invoice Extraction
UiPath bots start by connecting with an ERP system of the organisation (i.e. SAP or Oracle). The bots are
programmed in a manner that they extract pending and due invoices on a daily basis. The bot automatically
gathers all invoice information and saves it in a format rather than manually downloading reports and
making lists. The solution helps to avoid missing any invoices and keep the AR pipeline transparent.

2. Automated Reminders
After extracting invoices, bots automatically send customer reminders. The bots use communication APIs
such as Outlook or Twilio to send Emails or SMS messages to the clients according to the due dates. These
reminders are customised and even contain payment links or references. Soft reminders are generated when
invoices are approaching deadlines, whereas priority alerts are generated in case of overdue invoices. This
systematic follow-up would provide uniformity and remove delays created by human factors.

3. Payment Tracking
Checking whether payments have been received is one of the most time-consuming manual tasks. The
UiPath bots enter into various bank portals and payment gateways and verify transactions via various
mediums like UPI, credit cards, NEFT/RTGS, and international transfers. The bots combine all payment
details in a report rather than having the staff scrutinise each account separately. This not only saves time
but also guarantees that inflows are visible in real-time.

4. Reconciliation
The reconciliation process is usually vulnerable to human error, particularly where payments are made in
part or in different currencies. The UiPath bots use set rules of business (matching invoice number, amount,
and date) to match the payment with the relevant invoice. OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and AI
modules are used in situations when scanned documents or non-standard invoices have to be processed.
These tools mined unstructured data and fed it into the reconciliation engine in order to make sure that it is
accurate and efficient.

5. ERP Update
The ERP system is automatically updated by the bot after the reconciliation process. The bot does the work
of updating payment status, invoice closing, and updating outstanding balances, rather than having AR

8
executives enter the information manually. This will help to keep the ERP updated on the latest financial
position so that accurate reporting and forecasting are possible.

6. Escalation
The UiPath bot triggers an escalation workflow in situations where the payment is still not received after a
particular delay. This can be done by alerting the AR team, alerting account managers, or automatically
imposing late fees and penalties according to the company policy. The escalation makes sure that critical
accounts are dealt with in time to avoid revenue leakages.

7. Reporting and Analytics

Eventually, the bot prepares detailed AR reports and dashboards. The system can give insights into overdue
accounts, ageing analysis, Days Sales Outstanding (DSO), ageing trends, and customer payment trends
using such tools as Power BI or Tableau. These analytics help the management to recognize the high-risk
accounts and proactively correct them.

Together, these seven steps represent a fully automated AR lifecycle—from invoice generation to
reporting—driven by UiPath bots.

Step-by-Step Bot Logic

1. Invoice Extraction: UiPath bots connect to the ERP system (SAP/Oracle) to extract pending and
due invoices daily. This eliminates the need for manual downloads or spreadsheet maintenance.
2. Automated Reminders: Based on due dates, the bot sends Email/SMS reminders automatically
to customers via integrated communication APIs such as Outlook or Twilio. Overdue reminders
are prioritised.
3. Payment Tracking: The bot automatically logs into payment gateways and bank portals to track
transactions across multiple channels such as UPI, credit cards, and direct transfers.
4. Reconciliation: Using invoice number, amount, and date as matching criteria, the bot reconciles
payments against invoices. For scanned or non-standard documents, OCR/AI modules are used
for maintaining data accuracy.
5. ERP Update: After the reconciliation process is completed, the bot posts the payment status
directly into the ERP system in real time, ensuring up-to-date AR records.
6. Escalation: If an invoice remains overdue beyond a defined threshold, the bot triggers alerts to
the AR team and applies late fees or penalties based on company policy.
7. Reporting & Analytics: The bot generates dashboards and ageing reports through BI tools such
as Power BI or Tableau, providing management with insights on overdue accounts and Days
Sales Outstanding (DSO).

Systems and Tools Involved

For seamless automation, multiple systems are integrated into the UiPath ecosystem:
● ERP Platforms (SAP / Oracle): The system used for the generation, tracking and closing of
invoices.
● RPA Platform (UiPath): The RPA tool that designs, executes, and manages bots.

9
 ● Payment Gateways & Bank APIs: Interfaces that provide transaction details from multiple
payment sources.
● Communication APIs (Outlook / Twilio): The channels that help in sending automated Email
and SMS reminders.
● Business Intelligence Tools (Power BI / Tableau): Visualisation platforms used to present AR
data and trends.
Each of these systems is orchestrated by UiPath's automation engine, ensuring that data flows seamlessly
from one step to the next.

Devices and Execution Environment

The UiPath automation-based solution is executed through a combination of unattended and attended bots:
● Unattended Bots (Server VMs): Deployed on virtual machines, these bots work 24/7 without
human intervention. They handle large-scale AR automation, such as invoice extraction,
reminders, payment tracking, and ERP updates.
● Attended Bots (Desktops): Used by AR staff to handle exceptions and complex cases where
human judgment is necessary. For instance, if an invoice mismatch cannot be resolved
automatically, the attended bot assists staff in processing it quickly.
● OCR/AI Modules: These are critical when dealing with scanned or non-standard documents. AI
enhances the accuracy of data capture, particularly for global operations involving multiple
formats and languages.
This hybrid execution environment ensures both scalability and flexibility.

Real-World Example: Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola implemented UiPath bots to improve its Accounts Receivable process across multiple regions
and multiple currencies. The automation-based solution delivered the following benefits:
● Automated reminders help in ensure timely follow-ups without burdening staff.
● Multi-currency reconciliations were processed accurately using OCR and rule-based logic.
● Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) was reduced by 30%, improving cash flow significantly.
● Manual AR effort dropped by 60%, freeing staff to focus on customer relationships and dispute
resolution.
● Overall reconciliation accuracy improved to 90%, reducing errors and improving financial
reporting.
This example demonstrates how RPA can be scaled effectively in a global enterprise, directly addressing
the challenges highlighted in the problem statement.

10
Q4. Build the Business Case for the RPA/bot Solution
Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE) has become one of the biggest bottlers and distributors of the retail and
consumer goods industry in the globe. Since its operations are distributed in several countries, the company
has to deal with millions of invoices and payments each month to distributors, retailers, and partners. Coca-
Cola was selected as a case study since its size, volume of transactions, and dependence on a timely cash
flow makes it an ideal place where automation in Accounts Receivable (AR) would generate the greatest
business value. Accounts Receivable (AR) is one of the most sensitive finance functions that can directly
influence the liquidity and cash flow.

The Problem Coca-Cola Was Facing

The Accounts Receivable role of CCE was very inefficient and manual:

● The teams were required to come up with invoices and reminding in various regions and systems
of payment.
● Reminders were at times sent in a delayed manner or at random. This contributed to delays in
collections.
● Money was exchanged in various forms like bank transfers, credit cards, wallets, and cash but the
ERP system could not bring this money together in real time.
● Lots of accounts and disagreements occurred because of the frequent occurrence of reconciliation
errors.
● The DSO was large and this implied that cash was tied up in receivables longer and this
undermined liquidity.

Real-time scenario:
Suppose a huge chain of supermarkets is buying thousands of Coca-Cola products. They were
given invoices but delays in reminding to make payments thus payments crossed due dates. The
AR team would then spend days in the field to hunt the customer down manually, and also
dealing with incomplete payments that were received through various channels. Weeks had
elapsed by the time the payments were settled resulting in cash flow problems and customer
frustrations.

How UiPath RPA Was Implemented

Coca-Cola decided to use UiPath RPA to deal with these inefficiencies. Bots were deployed to:

1. Automate Invoice Distribution - UiPath bots had access to the ERP retrieving invoices which
were sent automatically to customers.
2. Send Timely Reminders - Automated email/SMS were sent after specific time intervals to remind
all invoices that were not paid.
3. Monitor Multi-Channel Payments - Bots tracked payments between bank and wallet transactions,
cards, and UPI and updated transactions in real-time.

11
 4. Automate Reconciliation - Matching of payments against invoices was done but exceptions were
identified that would be reviewed manually.
5. Escalation & Reporting - Bots would escalate outstanding accounts after X days and create
dashboards with customer risk-information.

Comparative Business Case Analysis

Parameter Before RPA After RPA (UiPath Business

(Manual Process) Solution) Justification /
Impact

Team Efforts 10–12 AR staff 4–5 staff for oversight; Workforce reduced by
dedicated to routine UiPath bots handle 60– ~50%; staff can now
follow-ups & 70% of repetitive work focus on exception
reconciliation handling, disputes, and
value-added analysis.

Time Saved Payment reconciliation Daily reconciliation Time saved = ~60–70

took 3–4 days/month; completed in 1–2 hours; hours/month;
reminders often delayed reminders triggered
collections accelerated
automatically
→ faster cash inflows.

Cost Reduction High operating costs ~25% cost savings Reduced dependency on
(~USD 1M/year on AR (~USD 250K/year) in manual labor; ROI
team & manual AR operations achieved in 12–18
processes) months post-
deployment.

Quality (Accuracy) Frequent mismatches; 90–95% reconciliation Errors reduced

~80–85% reconciliation accuracy with UiPath significantly, ensuring
accuracy bots cleaner books and
reliable compliance.

Business Impact Delayed collections; 30% reduction in DSO Direct improvement in

weak liquidity; → faster cash flow; liquidity, profitability,
dissatisfied customers and customer trust.
timely invoices &
reminders → improved
customer satisfaction

Technological Impact Legacy ERP not UiPath bots integrated Modernization without
integrated with diverse ERP with multiple full ERP replacement;
payment channels (UPI, payment gateways, plus improved IT agility.
cards, wallets, bank APIs for real-time
transfers) communication

12
 Process Impact Reactive, manual Automated reminders, End-to-end visibility,
collections; escalations proactive collections, reduced disputes, fewer
delayed; poor visibility real-time dashboards & escalations.
predictive analytics

Customer Impact Late or inconsistent Timely reminders, Higher satisfaction

communication improved transparency

Coca-Cola Enterprises' case study illustrates that RPA, driven by UiPath, has helped to change Accounts
Receivable, a manual, cost-intensive process into a fast, accurate, and customer-focused process.

● Liquidity Increased: 30% decrease in DSO - accelerated cash flows.

● Savings in Costs: $25 million OPEX savings, which could be used to initiate strategic work.
● Accuracy Achieved: 90-95% reconciliation accuracy assured good records.
● Customer Trust Improved: As communication was timely, error-free, it boosted customer
satisfaction.
● Future-Ready AR: Multichannel and predictive analytics re-architecturized AR and did not require
a costly ERP re-implementation.

This confirms that RPA is capable of not only optimizing finance activities, but also strategic business
value, which is a compelling argument to companies in the retail sector and beyond.

13
Q5. Process Improvisation - Existing Flow
The Accounts Receivable (AR) process used in the retailing industry is highly dependent on manual
interventions. Even though the ERP system produces invoices, virtually all the other steps, such as invoice
transmission to balance the payments, are manual. This reliance on employees renders the tasks
cumbersome, prone to errors, and expensive, especially when volumes of transactions are high.

The following flowchart represents the As-Is AR process prior to adopting RPA.

In the ERP system, the invoice is generated and then the AR staff manually sends invoices to customers via
email or print copy. Thereafter, customers pay through various methods like UPI, debit/credit cards, wallets,
bank transfers or even cheques. After the banks and payment gateways process payments, AR personnel
need to log into this system and obtain statements and extract the information about the transactions. Such
information is then manually compared with invoices in the ERP.

At this level, we will have a decision point where, should the payment be equal to that of the invoice, the
staff will register the payment in the ERP and should not be then an exception is recorded. Exception
handling is prone to making contact to customers or sales teams, which takes up a lot of resources and time.
When they are not recouping the outstanding amounts, the collections manager refers the issue to third
parties or legal associates. Lastly, AR employees compile payments information using a combination of
sources to produce their reports on a monthly basis at the end of every month.

The process is functional, but inefficient. The major troubles found are:

● Too much manual labour: Employees waste hours in their monotonous work, downloading reports
and balancing payments.

14
 ● Delay in payments: Month-end payment reconciliations and matching payments may consume
days, slowing down the money flow.
● High error rates: Because of manual data handling, the accounts become mismatched and have
errors.
● Customer dissatisfaction: Reminders and invoices lead to time delays and customer mistrust.
● Escalation costs: This makes use of managers and external agencies in regard to cases that are
overdue to raise operational costs.
● Absence of real time visibility: The reports are compiled at the end of the month; therefore, the
decision-makers are unable to get real-time information about the performance of AR.
Overall, the current AR process is extremely people-intensive and not automated. It is a significant
contributor to delayed collections, increased costs and reduced accuracy, all of which have been mentioned
above in the problem statement.

15
Q6. Process Improvisation - RPA Flow

The process has also been re-engineered on Robotic Process Automation (RPA) in order to address the
inefficiencies of manual AR cycle. Rather than developing an overhaul of the entire workflow, automation
has been added to the one developed so far, focusing on activities that are repetitive, rule-driven. This
solution will enable a quicker implementation, low impact, and an immediate payback.

As can be seen in the chart below, the To-Be process flow indicates that automation replaces the functions
that were once being carried out manually as long as the staff members still have the ability to make
exceptions and escalations.

RPA-Enhanced Accounts Receivable Process (To-Be)

The reinvented process will still start with invoice generation in the ERP, but after that, most of the work
will be done by RPA bots. When invoices and reminders are sent through email or SMS, then
communication with customers is done on time. After payments are made bots extract the appropriate data
and check transactions against the invoices in the ERP after downloading the statements of payment
gateways and banks.

On the match, upon a successful matching of payment, the bot records the entry in the ERP and alerts the
customer on his receipt. When payments are unable to be reconciled, the bots will automatically capture an
exception and forward the case to AR employees to investigate. Uncollected accounts receive systematic
future-updating (by automatic telephone reminders), and only extreme or non-responsive cases are handed

16
over to managers. Lastly, bots do not wait until the end of the month, but rather, it produces daily collections
performance reports and dashboards in real-time, thus providing stakeholders with information about their
collections performance.

The RPA-enabled workflow provides the following important advantages over the As-Is manual process:

● Efficiency: Bots remove electronic tediousness, including manually downloading statements,

reconciling payments, and writing reports.
● Speed: The re-concert periods become minutes, instead of days, to boost the money flow.
● Honesty: Data processing is more accurate and enhances accuracy of financial data.
● Customer experience Customer satisfaction/trust On-time reminders and confirmations will
increase customer trust.
● Real time insights: Dashboards give real time visibility of outstanding accounts and collection
performance.
● Resource optimization: Human staff is oriented on exception treatment and strategy but on the
contrary, not on regularity.
To sum up, the To-Be process shows how RPA can help to change the manual, slow procedure of AR
operations into a data-oriented and faster process. The automation of approximately 70 percent of AR
processes can enable faster collections, greater accuracy, and increased working capital that is directly
related to the benefit discussed in the business case above.

17
Q7. RPA tools recommended for this solution

Retail AR is extremely complicated because of the high number of customers, high frequency of
transactions, multiple payment gateways, and seasonal customer demand. Manual AR operations put the
company at risk of delayed invoice reconciliation, high Days Sales Outstanding (DSO), missed collections,
and real-time visibility. These inefficiencies have a direct effect on the working capital, cash flow lifelines
that are important in the retail sector.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) provides a practical solution to address some of the repetitive AR
processes (e.g., invoice creation, payment matching, exception handling, and collections follow-ups).

Case Example: Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola had serious issues in harmonizing high-volume invoices between geographies and distributors.
Not only did manual reconciliation slow down collections, it also caused more disagreements with retailers
and partners.

By deploying RPA, Coca-Cola:

● Invoice-to-cash processes are fully automated, so that invoices are matched to payments much
faster.
● Data Mining Implemented RPA bots with ERP systems (SAP) and customer portals to reconcile
unmatched payments in real-time.
● Less human intervention, minimized mistakes and conflicts.
● Better DSO with a better working capital of several days.
● The provision of empowered real-time dashboards to enable finance teams to track the AR
performance by region.

This change will make it clear that automation is one of the key elements that facilitates scalability,
precision, and stabilization of cash flow in retail AR.

Recommended RPA Tool: UiPath

Having considered the top tools (UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism), UiPath stands out as the
most suitable tool in the case of AR automation in the retail sector. It provides ready integrations to the
industry, exception handling powered by AI, and scalability to handle high seasonal demands.

Top 5 UiPath (USPs) Differentiators.

1. ERP & Payment Gateway Connectors.

● UiPath also has built-in connectors to SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, Stripe, PayPal, and other
gateways.
● This speeds up the implementation of AR bots without intensive customization.

18
 ● Case: Coca-Cola has incorporated UiPath bots into SAP and customer portal integration to allow
real-time reconciliation.

2. Exception Handling based on AI.

● The Document Understanding + AI Fabric offered by UiPath assists in detecting and clearing
unmatched payments, partial receipts, or inaccurate entries of invoice contents.
● Cuts up to 60-70 percent of the manual exception queues, reducing lag time.

3. Retail Peaks Retail Peaks Scalability.

● The retail is seasonal (festivals, sale campaigns, launches). The UiPath bots can be scaled on
demand to process 2-3x the number of invoices at the peak times.
● Example: In the promotional campaigns by Coca-Cola, RPA automatically scaled to accommodate
the payment of distributors.

4. Live Dashboards, analytics.

● Through UiPath Insights, the financial department has access to DSO, accounts receivable,
collection, and efficiency of AR.
● The decision-makers will be able to be proactive by setting up automated notices of accounts that
are overdue.

5. Low-Code Deployment

● The low-code/no-code platform of UiPath enables business departments (AR clerks, finance users)
to construct workflows without strong IT support capabilities.
● This makes it quicker to deploy and increases ROI.

Other features

● Large Transactions: Scale automates basic AR operations.

● Multi-channel Payment: Makes gateways (credit cards, UPI, wallets, bank transfer) work smoothly.
● Unstable Demand: Rises and falls as retail seasons are at peak/off-peak.
● Stability of Cash Flow: Decreases DSO and enhances on-time collections.
● Global and Local Operations: Suits both the multinational retail companies, such as Coca-Cola,
and regional chains.

UiPath AR Automation Business Results (Retail Environment)

● Reduced Invoice-to-Cash Times: Decreases processing time by as much as 70.

● Better Working Capital: Decreases DSO and increases predictability of cash flow.
● Reducing Instances of errors: AI minimizes uncontested payments and conflicts.

19
 ● Better AR Visibility: Finance departments keep track of real time KPIs.
● Increased Productivity: Workers will move out of the manual data entry process to strategic
processes such as credit risk analysis.

The UiPath is the most complete solution in automating the Accounts Receivable in retail, where speed,
accuracy, and scalability are of benefit. The Coca-Cola case demonstrates how RPA enhances the efficiency
of AR and improves the reduction of conflicts and the financial agility.

With UiPath-based AR automation implementation, retail businesses will be able to maximize cash flow,
improve customer relationships, and become more competitive.

20