0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views8 pages

Young Entrepreneurs' Start-Up Capital Study

Uploaded by

kcmarikit
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views8 pages

Young Entrepreneurs' Start-Up Capital Study

Uploaded by

kcmarikit
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter III

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

​In this chapter, research design, locale and population, sampling technique and data gathering

procedure were presented. The researchers provide this for the reader to know how the study was

conducted.

Research Design

This study utilized a descriptive research design. Descriptive design depicts the participants in

an accurate way. This method was chosen because the researchers sought to know the effects and

predict the variance of one or more variables using the variance of another variable(s). The goal

of descriptive research design is to collect information methodically in order to describe a

phenomena, situation, or population. More particular, it assists in answering the what, when,

where, and how questions about the research challenge rather than the why (Descriptive

Research Design: What it is and how to use it, 2023).

Locale and Population

​ ​The respondents of this study are the selected 30 young entrepreneurs between the ages

of 16 and 28 that are owners of a small and medium-sized business in Quipot for a minimum of

one year. Respondents to the study will assist researchers in accumulating crucial and reliable
information specifically about their start-up capital which is an initial investment in relation with

the survival rate of companies run by young entrepreneurs, including insight and experiences.

Research Instruments

​ ​The survey questionnaire will be utilized in this study to investigate the start-up capital

accumulated by young entrepreneurs that influenced the length of business operation and the

current operational status of the business. It will be divided into four parts. The profile of the

respondents in terms of age, gender, educational attainment, type of business and number of

years in operation will be the first section of the questionnaire. The data provided an overview of

the characteristics of the young entrepreneurs and helped the researchers identify patterns related

to their background and business operations. The second part will assess the initial amount of

capital invested by the respondents to start their business. It included items on the amount of

start-up capital, source of funding, sufficiency of capital, ease of access to funds, and financial

challenges encountered during the first year of operation. The third section includes how long the

respondents’ businesses had been operating and their current operational status that measured the

duration of operation, current business condition, changes in income, and growth indicators such

as expansion or product diversification. Lastly, the fourth section determined the respondents’

level of agreement on how start-up capital influences the survival and stability of their

businesses. The final section will be patterned on a 4-point Likert’s Scale with designated value

to determine the relationship of start-up capital and business survival rate. Participants in this
study were given questionnaires to complete after the study in order to gather information

regarding their experiences. Likert-type scales are the ones that have been used a lot in studies on

any field of education. As stated by Nee, C. & Yushu, M. This Likert-type scale (2020) is

predicated on the notion that attitudes can be quantified and that the strength/intensity of

experience is linear, i.e., on a continuum from strongly agree to strongly disagree. With reference

to Table 1, the respondents' answers were ascertained using a Likert scale with four points: 1-

Strongly disagree, 2- Disagree, 3-Agree, and 4 - Strongly agree. The obtained means from the

weighted student responses were interpreted as follows.

Table 1: Likert Four-Point Scale Range Interpretation

POINT SCALE RANGE EXPLANATION

4 4.00-3.00 Strongly Agree

3 2.99-2.00 Agree

2 1.99-1.00 Disagree

1 1.00-0.99 Strongly Disagree


Sampling Technique

​ ​The researchers selected 30 young entrepreneurs from Brgy. Quipot Tiaong Quezon as

their respondents. Purposive random sampling technique was used to choose the participants. It

is a non-probability sampling, and the respondents were chosen depending on the characteristics

of the population and the purpose of the study. According to Nikolopoulou (2023), purposive

sampling involves choosing persons of the population who are likely to have specific features or

experiences (and are willing to share them with you). This allows you to focus on a small sample

size by selecting persons or instances that meet your study. It is a method that can be used in both

quantitative and qualitative research to locate and select examples with a lot of information so

that the limited sources are used as efficiently as possible. The researchers chose only

respondents who are 16 and 28 young owners of a small and medium-sized business in Quipot

that operates for a minimum of one year.

Date Gathering

In gathering data and information from the respondents, the researchers underwent a

series of procedures.

Requesting authorization to the respondents, the researchers personally approached the

chosen young entrepreneurs and requested permission to be one of the respondents.


Instrument administration and retrieval. Following approval, the verified surveys will be

delivered to the young entrepreneurs. Their answers will be kept private and secure. To achieve

100% retrieval, the researchers personally retrieved the questionnaire.

Data collection and processing. Following the retrieval of the surveys, the findings will be

tallied and handled statistically. The data will be organized for easier statistical processing in

order to answer the study's researchers' questions.

The interpretation and analysis of data. After tabulation and calculation, the data analysis

and interpretations will be given. The findings will serve as the foundation for the study's

conclusions and suggestions.

Data Analysis Procedure

The results gathered from the assessment checklist were tallied, tabulated, analyzed and

interpreted. Frequency and percentage distribution were utilized to provide a proportional

representation of each response in relation to the total number of participants, thereby facilitating

a comprehensive understanding of the respondents’ profiles and business characteristics. The

formula of frequency and percentage distribution is:

​ Where n is the number of samples and f is the frequency of responses.


​ The researchers will also compute the Means of responses employed in the treatment

data. It was applied to the Likert-scale items in the fourth section of the questionnaire to

determine the average response of the participants regarding the relationship between start-up

capital and business survival. The resulting mean values were interpreted using a standardized

verbal scale to ensure consistency in data analysis.

Where:

x = Weighted mean

f = Frequency of each response

w = Weighted value assigned to each response

N = Total number of responses

​ The researchers was also employed the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation

Coefficient (r) to ascertain whether a significant relationship existed between the amount of

start-up capital and the business survival rate. This statistical tool was appropriate for measuring

the degree and direction of the linear relationship between two continuous variables.
The formula for Pearson’s r is given as:

Where:

r = Correlation coefficient

N = Number of paired scores

x = Independent variable (start-up capital)

y = Dependent variable (business survival rate)

​ The computed value of r was interpreted based on the following correlation scale:

Table 2: Correlation Interpretation Guide

Range of r-value Interpretation

0.80 – 1.00 Very High Positive Correlation

0.60 – 0.79 High Positive Correlation

0.40 – 0.59 Moderate Positive Correlation

0.20 – 0.39 Low Positive Correlation

0.00 – 0.19 Very Low or No Correlation

You might also like