Additive Manufacturing in Aerospace
Additive Manufacturing in Aerospace
Review
Institute for Systems Engineering Research, Mississippi State University, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA
Article history Abstract: The main advantages of Additive Manufacturing (AM) of metals
Received: 28-03-2024 in the aerospace industry are part consolidation; the reduction of lead time,
Revised: 29-04-2024 the construction of complicated structures easily with a great Strength-to-
Accepted: 10-05-2024 Weight (S:W) ratio; production of parts on-demand with reduced inventory,
Corresponding Author:
uncertainty and the costs of supply chains. Ti6Al4V and nickel-based alloys
Lidong Wang are commonly used AM materials for aerospace parts. Ground-based AM for
Institute for Systems aerospace has achieved great advances. AM has the potential to develop parts
Engineering Research, for general aviation, aircraft, missiles and less massive satellite systems. This
Mississippi State University, study introduces AM advantages, the technologies of AM, the materials and
Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA applications of AM and research progress in the aerospace industry; deals
Email: lidong@[Link] with the state-of-the-art of AM and its trends for aerospace; and highlights
its challenges and future research.
© 2024 Lidong Wang, Reed Mosher and Patti Duett. This open-access article is distributed under a Creative
Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
Lidong Wang et al. / American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2024, 17 (3): 116.125
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2024.116.125
117
Lidong Wang et al. / American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2024, 17 (3): 116.125
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2024.116.125
Laser DED (L-DED) AM technology employs a consumption. The thermal behaviors of L-PBF involve
focused laser beam to melt metallic wires or powders multi-physics phenomena, for example, thermal gradients,
while depositing them (layer by layer) to construct a heat absorption, etc. The complicated phenomena are
favorite geometry. L-DED has attracted substantial sensitive to laser power, beam shape and scan speed. PBF
attention in the industries of aerospace, defense, etc. L-DED has the best reproducibility and dimensional accuracy among
is appropriate for fabricating big metal parts/items with metal AM technologies (Pratap et al., 2023).
greater productivity and lower costs compared with other WAAM is a technique of DED. It has a high BTF ratio
metal AM technologies, for example, L-PBF and material and enables the production of parts with full density and
extrusion (Chen et al., 2023). reduced porosity. It has been employed to fabricate big
PBF has been powerful in the aerospace sector metallic parts in the aerospace industry (Mu et al., 2023).
because of good precision and the ability to construct Powder-Bed AM (PB-AM) is used in aerospace. PB-AM
complicated geometry (Alogla et al., 2023). It is vital to unifies a few powder-based AM technologies: SLS/SLM,
produce lightweight metal parts in the aerospace sector EBM and binder jetting (Katz-Demyanetz et al., 2019).
because reduced weight reduces emissions and oil DMLS and EBM are two common AM methods for
118
Lidong Wang et al. / American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2024, 17 (3): 116.125
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2024.116.125
printing metals. DMLS has been employed in the Various materials have been utilized in spacecraft,
industries of aviation and aerospace to produce parts by including stainless steel, plastics, glass, aluminum alloys,
melting the layers of thin metal powder (e.g., stainless Inconel alloys, carbon composites, ceramic matrix
steel, aluminum, titanium) (Prathyusha and Babu, 2022). composites, etc., (Sacco and Moon, 2019). Carbon fiber is a
Hybrid AM uses a secondary process (such as machining) significant material utilized for aerospace due to its smooth
for better surface quality of parts (Khorasani et al., 2022). finish and high S:W. FDM is the AM technology for carbon
fiber (Madhavadas et al., 2022). Applications of AM parts
Materials and Applications of AM include brackets and structural items, engine components,
turbine blades, etc. One of the metal AM applications for
Materials for AM in the aerospace sector include aerospace is the antenna (lightweight, made from
titanium alloys, aluminum alloys, cobalt alloys, copper aluminum) from Robert Hofmann company for
alloys, refractory alloys, nickel and iron-based communication satellites. This part filters high-frequency
superalloys, stainless steel, etc. Most of them are utilized radio waves (Khorasani et al., 2022). AM products in the
in the form of pre-alloyed powder, regularly made by gas aerospace industry include 3D printed communication
atomization, or in the form of wire depending upon the satellites, Radio Frequency (RF) filters, in communication
specific process (Blakey-Milner et al., 2021). The most satellites, satellite brackets (printed with titanium, optimized
popular materials for AM applications in the aerospace by topological optimization), rocket engines for spaceships,
sector are titanium and nickel base alloys because of their combustion chambers, 3D printed nozzle (injector heads)
outstanding performance at high temperatures. Ti6Al4V (Pant et al., 2021). Additional details of AM in the aerospace
alloy has a low thermal coefficient, low density, high sector are as follows (Blakey-Milner et al., 2021):
strength, high fracture toughness, etc. Therefore, it is
commonly utilized in aerospace. Many turbine blades are • Structures and brackets: Brackets, structures and
manufactured using titanium alloy for commercial aircraft frames are general application cases of AM and
(Debnath et al., 2022). topology optimization in the aerospace sector, for
Inconel alloys (e.g., Inconel 625 and Inconel 71) and example, aviation structures and brackets, lattice
titanium alloys have been extensively utilized for structures and spacecraft structures
aerospace. Inconel 718 is specifically utilized to produce • Static and dynamic engine components (e.g.,
gas turbines and other high-temperature structural parts turbomachinery components)
(Balaji et al., 2022). Titanium is costly, but it can be • Thermal devices (e.g., heat exchangers)
utilized as AM material without a considerable reduction • Liquid fuel rocket components (e.g., injector
of waste (Mohanavel et al., 2021). Ti6Al4V is one of the components)
most popular titanium alloys in the aerospace sector. The
most recommended Ni-based superalloys for aerospace The aerospace sector has been driven strongly by the
are Inconel 718 and Inconel 625; both are Ni-Cr-based requirements of large original equipment manufacturers;
alloys. Inconel 718 has good strength (tensile, rupture, therefore, the manufacturers of AM equipment have been
creep and fatigue), corrosion resistance and high working upgrading their processes as well as systems constantly to
temperature. Inconel 625 has good corrosion resistance, fit or follow the requirements. Table 4 shows some
high strength and outstanding manufacturability aerospace parts, their materials used, AM processes and
(including joining) (Katz-Demyanetz et al., 2019). companies where they are produced (Tepylo et al., 2019).
Table 4: Some aerospace parts produced by AM
Parts AM processes Materials used Companies
Rocket engine combustion chamber SLM Copper NASA
Thrusters on the SuperDraco rocket DMLS Nickel-based superalloys SpaceX
engines
Industrial gas turbine blades SLM Nickel-based superalloys Siemens
Ducts on the F/A-18E/F SLS Titanium-based Boeing
Aircraft engine brackets DMP (direct Titanium-based 3D systems
metal printing)
Front-bearing housing on the XWB-97 EBM Titanium-based Rolls Royce
Bleed air leak detectors on the F-35 EBM Ti6Al4V Lockheed Martin
F-15 pylon ribs DED Ti6Al4V Multiple companies funded by the
DOD in the USA
Nacelle hinge brackets on the A320 DMLS Ti6Al4V Airbus
Brackets on the A380 SLM Ti6Al4V Laser Zentrum Nord GmbH
(representing Airbus)
The rear frame on the Eurofighter typhoon WAAM Ti6Al4V BAE systems
Turbine combustion chamber DMLS Inconel 718 EOS
LEAP engine fuel injector nozzles SLS Co-Cr GE and Morris technologies
119
Lidong Wang et al. / American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2024, 17 (3): 116.125
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2024.116.125
Multi-material 3D printing has moved to the defense (Prathyusha and Babu, 2022). Topology optimization and
industry. Printing various materials together to fabricate the utilization of the lattice structure have the potential to
sustainable and cost-effective components has been fulfill mass reduction for aerospace applications. The
presented. For example, nickel-based materials are added development of new alloys for AM in aerospace
only in the zones required for wear or corrosion applications has been one of the important areas of AM
resistance. However, it is still a challenge to join (Blakey-Milner et al., 2021).
incompatible metals, for example, titanium and aluminum Generative Design (GD) helps increase the potential
(Machi, 2017). The use of AM has been decided to of AM. It is based on parametric tools of CAD that enable
manufacture rocket engine parts according to NASA' multiple optimized outputs for a designer to choose. The
strategy. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) (also known advantages of synergizing GD with AM in the early
as drones) are very important in the aerospace industry. A development stage of products have been demonstrated
complete drone or only a part of the components can be (Pilagatti et al., 2023). AM defects can be categorized into
produced using AM (Madhavadas et al., 2022). four types: (1) Pores, (2) Lack of fusion, (3) Irregular
surfaces or subsurface defects and (4) Microstructural
Research Progress and Trends in AM discontinuities. A formulation of the defect-driven
topology optimization for the fatigue design was
Aerospace structures (e.g., aircraft wings) are
generalized (Boursier Niutta et al., 2022).
designed for requirements of strength, stiffness and
Cracks and keyhole pores are damaging defects in
stability under certain conditions of loading. The AM of
alloys produced by L-DED. An in-situ pipeline with
continuous carbon fiber composite provides possibilities
acoustic signal-denoising, feature-extraction and sound
for the cost-effective and automatic manufacturing of
classification was developed that incorporated
highly loaded structures. Compliant or so-called
convolutional neural networks for the online detection
morphing mechanisms (exploiting the elastic properties of
of defects in L-DED. Microscope images were
materials to obtain shape changes) show the potential to
employed to locate the cracks and keyhole pores in a
enhance the flight performance of aerospace structures.
product (Chen et al., 2023).
The AM of composites combined with utilizing morphing
SLM is a metal-based AM technology. Machine
mechanisms has the potential to lower production costs
Learning (ML) and numerical simulation (based on the
while enhancing the flight performance of the structures
finite element model) were combined to study the SLM
(Fasel et al., 2020).
process. Laser speed, hatch space, layer thickness, Young's
Additive (layer) manufacturing of vibration dampers modulus and Poisson ratio were considered as input
for the aerospace sector was introduced and the spiderweb parameters, while output parameters were predicted normal
cellular structure constructed via the AM for aerospace strains in the product. Optimal parameters were found for
was presented. A lattice structure within the spiderweb the SLM process (Chaudhry and Soulaïmani, 2022).
absorbs maximal vibration during the high spin of a A data model of metal AM products was developed.
brushless motor (Bari and Bollenbach, 2022). A design There are five kinds of data in the model: Parameters of
method was developed for the cellular structure to be design, parameters of process, signatures of process,
fabricated using AM. The design method employed the parameters of post-processing and the quality of the
adaptive meshing technique of finite element analysis to product. The model is shown in Table 5 (Liu et al., 2022).
design the topology of the cellular structure and then the Table 5: A data model of metal AM products
cross-sectional area of each structure was optimized for Data categories Data sub-categories
the minimal weight subject to compatibility, stress and Design parameters Design features
buckling constraints. The method was demonstrated for an Build preparation
Process parameters Parameters of laser/beam and scanning
aircraft bracket design (Opgenoord and Willcox, 2019). Properties of powder materials
An aerospace bracket was redesigned employing Parameters of powder bed and recoating
Computer-Aided Design (CAD) with topology Parameters of the build environment
optimization and manufactured with Ti6Al4V alloy using Process signatures Melt pool
By-products
SLM. SLM is one of the AM methods and a popular Single track
deposition technology (layer by layer) for the Single layer
manufacturing of metallic components. Optimal printing Powder bed
parameters were simulated to minimize the production Post-processing Powder removing
time with the least residual stress (because of the high parameters Heat-treatment
Post-machining
thermal gradient in the AM process) (Satya Hanush and Non-standard processes
Manjaiah, 2022). AM integrated with the topology Product quality Geometry and dimension
optimization for the design and manufacturing of Quality of the surface
lightweight aerospace structures was presented Physical and mechanical properties
120
Lidong Wang et al. / American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2024, 17 (3): 116.125
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2024.116.125
4D printing refers to a printing process with three Table 6: Challenges of AM with various materials in the
spatial dimensions, plus material composition as the aerospace industry
fourth dimension. Such space and material flexibility in a Materials Challenges
production process will have valuable applications in the Polymers and composites Few choices
Weak mechanical properties
aerospace sector (Katz-Demyanetz et al., 2019). The trend
Metal and metal alloys Few choices in alloys
of earth or ground-based AM is that metallic 3D printing Not ideal surface finish
is employed in big launchers and spacecraft while Inadequate dimensional accuracy
polymers are utilized in relatively small spacecraft like Post-processing needed
CubeSats. Substantial efforts are ongoing to combine Ceramics Few choices
metallic 3D printing (specifically PBF and laser-based Not ideal surface finish
technologies) with the fabrication of launchers for the Inadequate dimensional accuracy
Need for post-processing
reduction of complexity and mass (Sacco and Moon,
2019). The main development trends of AM in aerospace AM parts can have defects/stress risers, for example,
are summarized as follows (Katz-Demyanetz et al., 2019): powder particles stuck on surfaces, partially melted
powder, voids from imperfection or gas pores and lack of
• Expanding the range of precursor materials, i.e., adhesion or pre-existing cracks/fractures formed between
metallic alloys (high entropy alloys and bulk subsequent printing layers. Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP)
metallic glasses), lightweight structures and and heat treatment help decrease residual stress and voids.
compositionally and functionally graded materials, HIP enables material joining improvement, porosity
metallic and ceramic matrix composites, as well as elimination, powder compaction and fatigue damage
refinement (Yakout et al., 2017).
composite-like materials
Composite structures are widely applied in aerospace
• Increasing the application trials of different PB-AM because of their high strength/stiffness. However, defects
technologies for aerospace, focusing on AM of in materials can evolve into local cracks/fractures easily
crucial aerospace parts under extreme or cyclic loading. Failures of composites
• The regulations standardization of AM for aerospace often result from very few cracks and defects formed
during the AM process. It is significant to monitor the AM
AM Challenges and Future Research process, detect defects in real time and eliminate the
defects in composite structures (Lu et al., 2023).
There are challenges for AM in the aerospace sector. AM drawbacks lie in cracks, porosity, surface
All the challenges can be future research. Table 6 lists the roughness, material anisotropy, unique microstructures
challenges according to the used materials (Frazier, 2014; and residual stress (inducing crack extension and
Zhan and Li, 2021). Other challenges in the aerospace structural deformation). Post-processing is sometimes
area lie in (1) Problems in measuring porosity and residual required with thermomechanical treatment, surface
stresses accurately; (2) No suitable certifications or polishing, or final machining. Major defects in Al parts
standards for a product manufactured using AM; (3) Size produced using AM include anisotropy, residual stresses,
constraints in some AM processes; (4) Not easy to analyze poor surface quality (great surface roughness), porosity and
surface roughness when using certain AM technologies; (5) hot cracking. One drawback of Al alloys is oxidation
Limitations in build consistency, resolution and build (causing porosity in the product). In addition, parts made of
quality for AM technologies; (6) Impossible to make big Al alloys using AM often exhibit porosity that is associated
structures utilizing some AM parts; (7) A challenge when with both process parameters and material composition,
employing topological optimization for AM; (8) Not easy which is shown in Table 7 (Montanari et al., 2023).
to qualify materials used for AM because of The aerospace sector substantially relies on available
inconsistencies, thus expensive to complete a good quality spare components/parts to sustain the reliability and
testing; (9) A problem in having the perfect safety of aircraft. Volatility (variability or unpredictability
microstructure and composition for a component although of customer demands) can happen because of incidents or
ceramics can be used in AM with a high S:W; and (10) accidents, maintenance requirements, changes in aircraft
With disadvantages (e.g., residual stresses, poor design and shifts in economic conditions and customer
microstructure control and less choices of materials) when demands. Thus, managing inventory and supply chain risk
metallic glasses used (Madhavadas et al., 2022). effectively is a challenging task because of unpredictable
Despite many benefits, AM has inherent issues in demands, parts with a high value and long lead time
aerospace applications, including imperfection in related to production and delivery (Alogla et al., 2023).
materials, size limitation, lack of process repeatability and The influences of AM on the bullwhip effect in the spare
predictability, uncertainty in long-term performance, high components/parts of the aerospace sector can be an
infrastructure and running costs etc., (Tepylo et al., 2019). important future research topic (Debnath et al., 2022).
121
Lidong Wang et al. / American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2024, 17 (3): 116.125
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2024.116.125
Table 7: The reasons for porosity in Al alloy parts produced development of rigorous procedures and standards for
using AM certifying the AM processes and materials of various AM
Reasons Details methods or technologies is still a challenge. Furthermore,
Process parameters Laser power AM challenges in this study were summarized based on
Scanning strategy
Scanning speed the literature; there are possibly more challenges in the
Building direction actual production processes of various AM techniques.
Thickness of the powder layer There is an increasing trend towards manufacturing larger
Preheating temperature or more complex parts using AM. Advanced robotics and
Atmosphere of building room
Material composition Impurities
automation help to improve the efficiency and
Al wettability productivity of large-scale AM. Artificial Intelligence
Low absorption of laser energy (AI) can be used to optimize the geometry of AM parts
Evaporation of alloying elements and AM process parameters (Pratap et al., 2022).
122
Lidong Wang et al. / American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2024, 17 (3): 116.125
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2024.116.125
References Chen, L., Yao, X., Tan, C., He, W., Su, J., Weng, F., Chew,
Y., Ng, N. P. H., & Moon, S. K. (2023). In-Situ Crack
Alogla, A. A., Alzahrani, A., & Alghamdi, A. (2023). The and Keyhole Pore Detection in Laser Directed Energy
Role of Additive Manufacturing in Reducing Deposition Through Acoustic Signal and Deep
Demand Volatility in Aerospace: A Conceptual
Learning. Additive Manufacturing, 69, 103547.
Framework. Aerospace, 10(4), 381.
[Link]
[Link]
Debnath, B., Shakur, M. S., Tanjum, F., Rahman, M. A.,
ASTM. (2012). Committee F42 on Additive
& Adnan, Z. H. (2022). Impact of Additive
Manufacturing Technologies and Subcommittee F42.
Manufacturing on the Supply Chain of Aerospace
91 on Terminology. Standard terminology for
Spare Parts Industry-A Review. Logistics, 6(2), 28.
additive manufacturing technologies. ASTM
International. [Link] [Link]
Balaji, D., Ranga, J., Bhuvaneswari, V., Arulmurugan, B., Fasel, U., Keidel, D., Baumann, L., Cavolina, G.,
Rajeshkumar, L., Manimohan, M. P., Devi, G. R., Eichenhofer, M., & Ermanni, P. (2020). Composite
Ramya, G., & Masi, C. (2022). Additive Additive Manufacturing of Morphing Aerospace
Manufacturing for Aerospace from Inception to Structures. Manufacturing Letters, 23, 85-88.
Certification. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2022, [Link]
7226852. [Link] Frazier, W. E. (2014). Metal Additive Manufacturing: A
Bari, K., & Bollenbach, L. (2022). Spiderweb Cellular Review. Journal of Materials Engineering and
Structures Manufactured via Additive Layer Performance, 23, 1917-1928.
Manufacturing for Aerospace Application. Journal [Link]
of Composites Science, 6(5), 133. Gao, W., Zhang, Y., Ramanujan, D., Ramani, K., Chen,
[Link] Y., Williams, C. B., Wang, C. C. L., Shin, Y. C.,
Blakey-Milner, B., Gradl, P., Snedden, G., Brooks, M., Zhang, S., & Zavattieri, P. D. (2015). The Status,
Pitot, J., Lopez, E., Leary, M., Berto, F., & Du Challenges and Future of Additive Manufacturing in
Plessis, A. (2021). Metal Additive Manufacturing in Engineering. Computer-Aided Design, 69, 65-89.
Aerospace: A Review. Materials and Design, 209, [Link]
110008. [Link] Guo, S., Agarwal, M., Cooper, C., Tian, Q., Gao, R. X.,
Boursier Niutta, C., Tridello, A., Barletta, G., Gallo, N., Guo Grace, W., & Guo, Y. B. (2022). Machine
Baroni, A., Berto, F., & Paolino, D. S. (2022). Defect- Learning for Metal Additive Manufacturing:
Driven Topology Optimization for Fatigue Design of Towards a Physics-Informed Data-Driven Paradigm.
Additive Manufacturing structures: Application on a Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 62, 145-163.
real Industrial Aerospace Component. Engineering [Link]
Failure Analysis, 142, 106737. Katz-Demyanetz, A., Popov, V. V., Kovalevsky, A.,
[Link] Safranchik, D., & Koptyug, A. (2019). Powder-Bed
Ceruti, A., Marzocca, P., Liverani, A., & Bil, C. (2019). Additive Manufacturing for Aerospace Application:
Maintenance in Aeronautics in an Industry 4.0 Techniques, Metallic and Metal/Ceramic Composite
Context: The Role of Augmented Reality and Materials and Trends. Manufacturing Review, 6, 5.
Additive Manufacturing. Journal of Computational [Link]
Design and Engineering, 6(4), 516-526. Khorasani, M., Ghasemi, A., Rolfe, B., & Gibson, I.
[Link] (2022). Additive Manufacturing a Powerful Tool for
Chaudhary, B., Jain, N. K., & Murugesan, J. (2022). the Aerospace Industry. Rapid Prototyping Journal,
Experimental Investigation and Parametric 28(1), 87-100.
Optimization of Friction Stir Powder Additive [Link]
Kozhay, K., Turarbek, S., Ali, M. H., & Shehab, E.
Manufacturing Process for Aerospace-Grade Al
(2022). Challenges of Developing Digital Twin for
Alloy. The International Journal of Advanced Additive Layer Manufacturing in the Aerospace
Manufacturing Technology, 123, 603-625. Industry. IEEE Xplore, 1-6.
[Link] [Link]
Chaudhry, S., & Soulaïmani, A. (2022). A Comparative Liu, C., Le Roux, L., Körner, C., Tabaste, O., Lacan, F.,
Study of Machine Learning Methods for & Bigot, S. (2022). Digital Twin-Enabled
Computational Modeling of the Selective Laser Collaborative Data Management for Metal Additive
Melting Additive Manufacturing Process. Applied Manufacturing Systems. Journal of Manufacturing
Sciences, 12(5), 2324. Systems, 62, 857-874.
[Link] [Link]
123
Lidong Wang et al. / American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2024, 17 (3): 116.125
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2024.116.125
Li, Y., Mu, H., Polden, J., Li, H., Wang, L., Xia, C., & Pant, M., Pidge, P., Nagdeve, L., & Kumar, H. (2021). A
Pan, Z. (2022). Towards Intelligent Monitoring Review of Additive Manufacturing in Aerospace
System in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing: A Application. Journal of Composite and Advanced
Surface Anomaly Detector on a Small Dataset. The Materials, 31(2), 109-115.
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing [Link]
Pasang, T., Budiman, A. S., Wang, J. C., Jiang, C. P.,
Technology, 120(7), 5225-5242.
Boyer, R., Williams, J., & Misiolek, W. Z. (2023).
[Link]
Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Alloys-Enabling
Lu, L., Hou, J., Yuan, S., Yao, X., Li, Y., & Zhu, J. (2023). Re-Manufacturing of Aerospace and Biomedical
Deep Learning-Assisted Real-Time Defect Detection Components. Microelectronic Engineering, 270,
and Closed-Loop Adjustment for Additive 111935. [Link]
Manufacturing of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Pierre, J., Iervolino, F., Farahani, R. D., Piccirelli, N.,
Polymer Composites. Robotics and Computer- Lévesque, M., & Therriault, D. (2023). Material
Integrated Manufacturing, 79, 102431. Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of
[Link] Multifunctional Sandwich Panels with Load-Bearing
Machi, V. (2017). Defense Industry Moves Toward Multi- and Acoustic Capabilities for Aerospace
Material 3D Printing. National Defense, 102(768), 21-22. Applications. Additive Manufacturing, 61, 103344.
[Link] [Link]
Madhavadas, V., Srivastava, D., Chadha, U., Aravind Raj, Pilagatti, A. N., Atzeni, E., & Salmi, A. (2023). Exploiting
the Generative Design Potential to Select the Best
S., Sultan, M. T. H., Shahar, F. S., & Shah, A. U. M.
Conceptual Design of an Aerospace Component to be
(2022). A Review on Metal Additive Manufacturing
Produced by Additive Manufacturing. The
for Intricately Shaped Aerospace Components. CIRP International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing
Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, Technology, 126(11), 5597-5612.
39, 18-36. [Link] [Link]
Mohanavel, V., Ashraff Ali, K. S., Ranganathan, K., Pratap, A., Sardana, N., Utomo, S., Ayeelyan, J.,
Allen Jeffrey, J., Ravikumar, M. M., & Rajkumar, S. Karthikeyan, P., & Hsiung, P.-A. (2022). A Synergic
(2021). The Roles and Applications of Additive Approach of Deep Learning towards Digital Additive
Manufacturing in the Aerospace and Automobile Manufacturing: A Review. Algorithms, 15(12), 466.
Sector. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 405-409. [Link]
[Link] Pratap, A., Sardana, N., Utomo, S., John, A., Karthikeyan,
Montanari, R., Palombi, A., Richetta, M., & Varone, A. P., & Hsiung, P.-A. (2023). Analysis of Defect
(2023). Additive Manufacturing of Aluminum Alloys Associated with Powder Bed Fusion with Deep
for Aeronautic Applications: Advantages and Learning and Explainable AI. In 2023 15th
Problems. Metals, 13(4), 716. International Conference on Knowledge and Smart
[Link] Technology (KST), 1–6.
Mu, H., He, F., Yuan, L., Commins, P., Wang, H., & Pan, [Link]
Z. (2023). Toward a Smart Wire Arc Additive Prathyusha, A., & Babu, G. R. (2022). 3D Printing
Manufacturing System: A Review on Current Integration with Topology Optimization for
Developments and a Framework of Digital Twin. Innovative Design and Fabrication of Light Weight
Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 67, 174-189. Aerospace Structures. In 2022 International
[Link] Conference on Recent Trends in Microelectronics,
Nyamekye, P., Rahimpour Golroudbary, S., Piili, H., Automation, Computing and Communications
Luukka, P., & Kraslawski, A. (2023). Impact of Systems (ICMACC), 1–6.
Additive Manufacturing on Titanium Supply Chain: [Link]
Case of Titanium Alloys in Automotive and Sacco, E., & Moon, S. K. (2019). Additive Manufacturing
Aerospace Industries. Advances in Industrial and for Space: Status and Promises. The International
Manufacturing Engineering, 6, 100112. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 105,
[Link] 4123-4146. [Link]
Opgenoord, M. M. J., & Willcox, K. E. (2019). Design for Satya Hanush, S., & Manjaiah, M. (2022). Topology
Additive Manufacturing: Cellular Structures in Optimization of Aerospace Part to Enhance the
Early-Stage Aerospace Design. Structural and Performance by Additive Manufacturing Process.
Multidisciplinary Optimization, 60, 411-428. Materials Today: Proceedings, 62, 7373-7378.
[Link] [Link]
124
Lidong Wang et al. / American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2024, 17 (3): 116.125
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2024.116.125
125