0% found this document useful (0 votes)
105 views6 pages

Unilateral Premolar Extraction Case Study

This case report discusses the treatment of a 22-year-old male with dental crowding through unilateral extraction of the upper and lower first premolars. The treatment resulted in an ideal Class I occlusion, improved esthetics, and a stable dental relationship without significant midline shift. The findings suggest that unilateral extractions can effectively address crowding while maintaining facial balance and harmony.

Uploaded by

patidaraayushi96
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
105 views6 pages

Unilateral Premolar Extraction Case Study

This case report discusses the treatment of a 22-year-old male with dental crowding through unilateral extraction of the upper and lower first premolars. The treatment resulted in an ideal Class I occlusion, improved esthetics, and a stable dental relationship without significant midline shift. The findings suggest that unilateral extractions can effectively address crowding while maintaining facial balance and harmony.

Uploaded by

patidaraayushi96
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Journal Of Advanced Sciences Vol.

3 Issue 1, 2024 Online ISSN: 1908-3238 Print ISSN: 2980-4809

Case Report

UNILATERAL EXTRACTION: A CASE


REPORT
Dr. Gaurav Sharma, Rajasthan University of Health Science, drgouravs1983@[Link]
Dr. Neeta Singh, Rajasthan University of Health Science, neetasingh0511@[Link]
Dr. Athira Muralidharan, Rajasthan University of Health Science, athiramurali124@[Link]
Dr. Rashmi Puri, Rajasthan University of Health Science, rashmipuri38@[Link]
Dr Jitendra Soni, Rajasthan University of Health Science, [Link]@[Link]

Abstract;
Crowded teeth have a major negative influence on the dentomaxillary
system. This article reports on the treatment of crowding with unilateral
premolar extraction. A 22-year-old male presented with crowding of the
upper and lower anterior teeth and bucally placed 13. The patient had a
chief complaint of irregular upper and lower front teeth. Clinical
examination showed a Class I relationship for the teeth, and
cephalometric measurements showed a Class I skeletal tendency. The
right upper and lower first premolars were extracted for anterior
crowding correction, and a segmented T loop was used for canine
retraction in the right upper arch. It is concluded that upper-first
premolar extraction is one of the options in the treatment of crowding.
Unilateral premolar extraction treatment can be performed to achieve a
functionally stable occlusion and an aesthetically pleasing appearance
for the patient.

Keyword: unilateral extraction, crowded, T loop, orthodontic treatment

INTRODUCTION:
The treatment for dental crowding varies according to the magnitude of the
problem. This therapy may involve follow-up to develop and correct the
occlusion. However, this is not always the case, and correction may occur
spontaneously in patients with slight crowding (up to 2 mm); cases of severe
crowding (>9 mm) may require more extensive therapy with tooth
extractions. Severe crowding caused by tooth size and arch length deficiency
may be treated at an early stage with serial tooth extractions in the early
mixed dentition (first transitory period) or with late extraction of the
premolars in the permanent dentition.1
The main goal of orthodontic treatment is to obtain a positive relationship
between the teeth and facial structures. Preservation of all dental units was
mandatory to achieve facial balance, harmony, and esthetics. However, some
studies related to the stability of treatments pointed out the necessity of tooth
extractions in order to correct malocclusions. 2
Therefore, asymmetric extractions would be necessary and important to
correct midline deviation for unilateral movement of the posterior teeth,
reduce treatment time and tooth movement, facilitate orthodontic mechanics,
and obtain more stable and functional results. Segmented T-loops favored the
bucally placed canine.

13
Journal Of Advanced Sciences Vol. 3 Issue 1, 2024 Online ISSN: 1908-3238 Print ISSN: 2980-4809

CASE REPORT
DIAGNOSIS AND AETIOLOGY
A 22-year-old male patient had reported to the Department of Orthodontics
with the chief complaint of irregular upper and lower front teeth. A facial
photograph showed a straight profile. On intraoral examination, it was
observed that the maxillary midline and mandibular midline were co-
inciding; the patient had a Class I molar relationship on both sides, and the
canine relationship was Class III. Anterior crossbite was seen in irt 12 and 43.
The maxillary arch was symmetric and U-shaped, and the mandibular arch
was wide, symmetric, and U-shaped. The cephalometric findings revealed a
hypodivergent growth pattern with a Class I skeletal base [Figure 2]. An
orthopantomogram was also recorded [Figure 2].

FIGURE 1: EXTRAORAL AND INTRAORAL PRE-TREATMENT


PHOTOGRAPHS

FIGURE 2: PRE-TRAINMENT RADIOGRAPHS

Treatment plan
On considering the diagnostic criteria, a decision was made for unilateral first
premolar extractions on the right side, alignment of the dentition into the
arches, and retraction of the right upper canine with a segmented T loop
(with a 0.017 x 0.025 TMA wire).

Treatment progress
Preadjusted edgewise MBT.022 slot brackets were bonded in the upper and
lower arches, and initial alignment using 016 NiTi wire was done without
involving the blocked-out canine in the continuous wire. The extraction of the
maxillary right first premolar was carried out. After sufficient space had been
created, the right maxillary canine was bonded and aligned within the arch
using a segmented T-loop. . The mandibular right first premolar was
14
Journal Of Advanced Sciences Vol. 3 Issue 1, 2024 Online ISSN: 1908-3238 Print ISSN: 2980-4809

extracted to maintain the canine relationship and the overbite. The


mandibular left canine was retracted into the extraction space using an active
tieback. Space created was used for the correction of crowding of the
mandibular incisors and midline correction.

FIGURE 3: SEGMENTED T-LOOP GIVEN FOR 13 RETRACTIONS

FIGURE 4: INTRAORAL TREATMENT PROGRESS

FIGURE 5: INTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHS (IN TREATMENT PROGRESS)

TREATMENT RESULTS
An ideal Class I occlusion was achieved in the patient with a positive
overbite and overjet. The smile appearance improved along with the esthetic
profile of the patient, which was maintained. The upper and lower midline
coincided with each other. The treatment result justified all the methods used
along with the input material as well as the psychological aspect.

15
Journal Of Advanced Sciences Vol. 3 Issue 1, 2024 Online ISSN: 1908-3238 Print ISSN: 2980-4809

FIGURE 6: INTRAORAL POST-TREATMENT PHOTOGRAPHS

FIGURE 7: POST-TREATMENT EXTRAORAL PHOTOGRAPHS

DISCUSSION
The present case was of a non-growing male patient with bucally placed
canine and anterior crossbite irt 12 and 43. Malocclusions with ectopically
erupted canines are typically dealt with through all four first premolar
extractions.3-9 The decision regarding the extraction or non-extraction
treatment plan is based on the amount of arch-length tooth material
discrepancy and the facial profile of the patient. According to Proffit and
Fields, teeth length arch period discrepancies beneath four mm teeth
extraction are hardly ever required, while discrepancies between five mm
and nine mm permit remedy to be achieved without or with extractions,
relying on the traits of the patient. In our patient, the tooth size-arch length
discrepancy was 9 mm in the maxillary arch and 9 mm in the mandibular
arch. Thus, it no longer suggests the extraction of all first premolars, as is
robotically observed in instances with ectopic canines. 10-12
The desire to extract teeth for orthodontic treatment ought to no longer be
primarily based on the space between teeth but also on different factors,
including the appearance and stability of the face.
According to Ramos et al., after 1 mm of retraction of the upper incisors, the
upper lip retracts by 0.75 mm.13 Incisor retraction of 1 mm results in upper lip
16
Journal Of Advanced Sciences Vol. 3 Issue 1, 2024 Online ISSN: 1908-3238 Print ISSN: 2980-4809

retraction of 0.64 mm. For each 1 mm of lower incisor retraction, the lower lip
retracts 0.6 mm. In our case, the patient has a pleasing profile. Thus, it did
now indicate the extraction of all four first premolars, which would have
resulted in a retrusive profile. A treatment plan was devised in such a way
that space could be created for the blocked-out canine.
While correcting the position of a highly placed canine, it should not be
engaged in the continuous wire so as to avoid the intrusive side effect on the
adjacent lateral incisor. Once the canine is brought close to the occlusal plane,
it can be aligned into the arch using continuous archwire mechanics.
Elastics were required in this patient for coordination of the maxillary and
mandibular midlines. Midline shift can occur as a result of unilateral or
asymetric extractions; thus, coordination of midlines should be undertaken
carefully in these cases.

CONCLUSION
Unilateral extractions can give good aesthetic results with stable occlusion
that maintains a good impact on the dentomaxillary system. It should be
underkan carefully to prevent midline shift and the development of arch
asymmetry during asymetric or unilateral extraction treatment methods. An
ideal Class I occlusion was achieved in this case with improved smile
esthetics while maintaining the pleasing and esthetic profile of the patient.
Asymmetric or unilateral extractions could simplify and facilitate orthodontic
treatment and mechanics in some specific cases. As a result, the first molar
relationship could differ on the right or left sides, but this asymmetry would
not cause functional or aesthetic problems for the patient.

REFERENCES
1. Felicita AS. Orthodontic management of a dilacerated central incisor and
partially impacted canine with unilateral extraction: A case report. The Saudi
Dental Journal. 2017 Oct 1;29(4):185–93.
2. Adiwirya MS, Purwanegara MK. Orthodontic Management of Maxillary
Canine-First Premolar Transposition by Unilateral Extraction. Journal of
Dentistry Indonesia. 2019;26(1):44–50.
3. Filho HL, Maia LH, Lau TC, de Souza MM, and Maia LC. Early vs. late
orthodontic treatment of tooth crowding by first premolar extraction: A
systematic review. The Angle Orthodontist. 2015 May 1;85(3):510–7.
4. Araújo TM, Caldas LD. Tooth extractions in orthodontics: first or second
premolars?. Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2019 Aug 1;24:88–98.
5. Zimmer B, Schelper I, and Seifi-Shirvandeh N. Localized orthodontic space
closure for unilateral aplasia of lower second premolars. The European
Journal of Orthodontics. 2007 Apr 1;29(2):210–6.
6. Struhs TW. Effects of unilateral extraction treatment on arch symmetry and
occlusion.
7. Melgaço CA, Araújo MT. Asymmetric extractions in orthodontics. Dental
Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2012;17:151-6.
8. Dahiya GD. Effects of Unilateral Premolar Extraction Treatment on the
Dental Arch Form of Class II Subdivisions (Doctoral dissertation, University
of Illinois at Chicago).
9. Sitasari PI, Syahdinda MR, and Triwardhani A. Management of Angle
Class I malocclusion with crowding and anterior crossbite by unilateral
premolar extraction. Makassar Dental Journal. 2023 Aug 1;12(2):167–70.
10. Bolton, WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and
treatment of malocclusion. The Angle Orthodontist. 1958 Jul 1;28(3):113-30.
11. Karanth D., Shetty vs. Canine Retraction by Sectional Arch Technique:

17
Journal Of Advanced Sciences Vol. 3 Issue 1, 2024 Online ISSN: 1908-3238 Print ISSN: 2980-4809

Comparison of Characteristics between T Loop Retraction Spring and PG


Retraction Spring J Ind Orthod Soc. 2002;35:17–27.
12. Dahiya G., A. Masoud, Viana G., A. Obrez, B. Kusnoto, & Evans. (2017).
Effects of unilateral premolar extraction treatment on the dental arch forms of
Class II subdivision malocclusions. American Journal of Orthodontics and
Dentofacial Orthopedics, 152(2), 232–241.
13. Tayer, BH. The asymmetric extraction decision. The Angle Orthodontist.
1992 Dec 1;62(4):291–7.

18

Common questions

Powered by AI

Segmented T-loops play a pivotal role in correcting uneven dental arch spaces by facilitating controlled movement of teeth, particularly in situations involving crowding and ectopic tooth positions. They are used predominantly in canine retraction processes by providing mechanical advantage, which allows precise control over the direction and magnitude of tooth movements . In the case study, the segmented T-loop was utilized to retract the right upper canine precisely into alignment within the dental arch, efficiently utilizing space created by the extraction without disturbing the continuous wire . This technique minimizes unwanted movements of adjacent teeth and optimizes the overall treatment outcome .

When deciding to perform unilateral extractions for orthodontic correction, several factors need consideration. These include the degree of tooth size-arch length discrepancy, especially if it exceeds 9 mm, the presence of asymmetrical crowding, the patient’s facial profile, midline symmetry, and the molar and canine relationships . Additionally, the individual aesthetic goals and functional requirements of the patient should be assessed. The potential for midline shift and the need for controlling such through orthodontic mechanics like segmented T-loops should also be evaluated. Each factor contributes to the overall treatment effectiveness, ensuring that the outcomes are stable and harmonious with the patient's facial structure .

Unilateral premolar extraction may be favored over bilateral extraction methods in cases where there is a discrepancy in arch length and tooth size that does not equally affect both sides of the dental arch. Specifically, if one side of the arch has overcrowding that is not mirrored on the other side, such as when a canine is ectopically erupted only on one side, unilateral extraction might be more suitable . This technique provides enough space for correcting the specific asymmetries and misalignments without affecting the opposite side, thereby preserving overall symmetry and improving esthetics and function .

Biomechanical considerations in using preadjusted edgewise MBT slot brackets and NiTi wires involve their capacity to deliver controlled, consistent forces that promote effective tooth alignment. Preadjusted edgewise MBT brackets are designed to accommodate individual tooth angulations and inclinations, facilitating precise and efficient tooth movement . NiTi wires are known for their high elasticity and shape memory, allowing them to exert a gentle continuous force over the teeth as they transition towards their correct positions, which is especially advantageous in the initial stages of aligning crowded teeth . These components work synergistically to achieve desired tooth positions with minimal discomfort and reduced risk of root resorption, ultimately simplifying the orthodontic mechanics required to manage crowding .

The integration of psychological considerations enhances orthodontic treatment outcomes by ensuring that treatment plans are not only mechanically effective but also psychologically acceptable to the patient. When unilateral extraction is part of the treatment plan, patient concerns regarding appearance both during and after treatment must be addressed. Communicating clearly about how these procedures will ultimately improve their dental aesthetics and function ensures patient cooperation and satisfaction . Moreover, psychological preparedness helps mitigate anxiety associated with orthodontic procedures, thereby enhancing compliance and the overall effectiveness of the treatment outcomes . Patient confidence in the procedure can lead to more positive engagement in the treatment process, optimizing results and patient satisfaction with the final complexion .

The presence of a Class III canine relationship alongside Class I molar relationship implies a complex malocclusion scenario requiring tailored orthodontic treatment. This discrepancy often indicates an anteroposterior misalignment where the anterior teeth, particularly the canines, are positioned more mesially compared to the rest of the teeth . Such a scenario necessitates targeted interventions to adjust and harmonize the bite. Treatment might include selective extractions, such as unilateral premolar extractions, to create sufficient space for proper alignment and retraction of canines to achieve both functional occlusion and improved esthetic profiles . This approach ensures that both the aesthetic line and function are optimized without overcompromising adjacent structures .

Cephalometric findings are crucial in informing the decision-making process for unilateral extractions as they provide detailed insights into the patient's skeletal and dental relationships. In the context of crowding correction, cephalometric analysis helps in assessing skeletal patterns such as Class I skeletal base and hypodivergent growth patterns, which influence how teeth align relative to the facial structures . These measurements help determine the necessity and impact of tooth extractions on the facial profile and occlusion. By elucidating these relationships, orthodontists can predict and plan movements needed to optimize aesthetic and functional outcomes, ensuring treatments are aligned with the individual’s skeletal framework .

Midline shifts and arch asymmetry are critical factors influencing orthodontic treatment plans for unilateral extractions. Unilateral extractions can potentially lead to midline deviations, which in turn may affect facial symmetry and balance. Therefore, careful coordination of dental midlines is essential to prevent such shifts during treatment . Additionally, the decision to proceed with unilateral extractions is often made based on individual patient characteristics, including facial profile and the degree of crowding . Asymmetric extractions can be carefully executed to maintain aesthetic and functional outcomes, ensuring that the arch symmetry and occlusal stability are preserved .

Asymmetrical extractions play a significant role in managing midline deviations by addressing discrepancies in arch length and tooth positioning that contribute to such misalignments. By extracting teeth on one side more than the other, orthodontists can realign the midline to better match the symmetrical axes of the face, thus improving both functional occlusion and aesthetic harmony . Careful coordination is necessary to prevent arch asymmetry and ensure that any shifts are deliberate and contribute positively to the occlusion. However, if not managed appropriately, asymmetric extractions can lead to future relapse, occlusal instability, or compromised aesthetics, underscoring the importance of precise planning and execution in these treatments .

Crowded teeth can negatively impact the dentomaxillary system by leading to malocclusion, which affects both function and aesthetics. To manage such challenges effectively, orthodontic treatment may involve unilateral or asymmetric extractions to balance the space discrepancy caused by tooth size and arch length deficiencies . For severe crowding (>9 mm), it often necessitates extraction of teeth such as the first premolars, particularly in non-growing or adult patients, to achieve a functionally stable occlusion and aesthetically pleasing results . This approach not only helps correct malocclusions but also reduces treatment time by simplifying orthodontic mechanics .

You might also like