0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views9 pages

LSD Design Analysis of Variance

The document outlines an experiment to perform LSD (Least Significant Difference) analysis of variance with a focus on treatments, rows, and columns. It presents hypotheses, calculations, and results indicating that there are no significant differences between treatments, rows, or columns based on the p-values obtained. The conclusion drawn from the analysis is that all null hypotheses are accepted.

Uploaded by

robindewan390
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views9 pages

LSD Design Analysis of Variance

The document outlines an experiment to perform LSD (Least Significant Difference) analysis of variance with a focus on treatments, rows, and columns. It presents hypotheses, calculations, and results indicating that there are no significant differences between treatments, rows, or columns based on the p-values obtained. The conclusion drawn from the analysis is that all null hypotheses are accepted.

Uploaded by

robindewan390
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Practical No: 11

Name of Experiment:
To perform LSD
Question:

Carry out the analysis of variance from the given LSD design.
B 15 C 12 A 18
C 15 A 12 B 25
A 19 B 18 C 25

Working Expression:
Hypothesis Setting:

Null hypothesis (𝐻0T): There is no significant difference between treatments.


Null hypothesis (𝐻0R): There is no significant difference between rows.
Null hypothesis (𝐻0C): There is no significant difference between columns.

Alternative hypothesis (𝐻1T): There is significant difference between treatments.


Alternative hypothesis (𝐻1R): There is significant difference between rows.
Alternative hypothesis (𝐻1C): There is significant difference between columns.

Level of Significance (α) = 0.05

Calculation Table:

PRE_1 RES_1
15.33 -.33
11.00 1.00
18.67 -.67
15.67 -.67
12.33 -.33
24.00 1.00
18.00 1.00
18.67 -.67
25.33 -.33

UNIANOVA Values BY Row Column Treatment


/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
/SAVE=PRED RESID
/POSTHOC=Row Column Treatment(TUKEY)
/PLOT=PROFILE(Row*Column Row*Treatment Column*Treatment) TYPE=LINE ERRORBAR=NO
MEANREFERENCE=NO
YAXIS=AUTO
/PRINT DESCRIPTIVE LOF
/PLOT=RESIDUALS
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN=Row Column Treatment.
Univariate Analysis of Variance
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
There are three 1 Row 1 3
rows(r1,r2,r3) 2 Row 2 3
3 Row 3 3
There are three 1 Column 1 3
columns(c1,c2,c3) 2 Column 2 3
3 Column 3 3
There are three 1 A 3
treatments(A,B,C) 2 B 3
3 C 3

Descriptive Statistics
Dependent Variable: Values
There are three There are three There are three Std.
rows(r1,r2,r3) columns(c1,c2,c3) treatments(A,B,C) Mean Deviation N
Row 1 Column 1 B 15.00 . 1
Total 15.00 . 1
Column 2 C 12.00 . 1
Total 12.00 . 1
Column 3 A 18.00 . 1
Total 18.00 . 1
Total A 18.00 . 1
B 15.00 . 1
C 12.00 . 1
Total 15.00 3.000 3
Row 2 Column 1 C 15.00 . 1
Total 15.00 . 1
Column 2 A 12.00 . 1
Total 12.00 . 1
Column 3 B 25.00 . 1
Total 25.00 . 1
Total A 12.00 . 1
B 25.00 . 1
C 15.00 . 1
Total 17.33 6.807 3
Row 3 Column 1 A 19.00 . 1
Total 19.00 . 1
Column 2 B 18.00 . 1
Total 18.00 . 1
Column 3 C 25.00 . 1
Total 25.00 . 1
Total A 19.00 . 1
B 18.00 . 1
C 25.00 . 1
Total 20.67 3.786 3
Total Column 1 A 19.00 . 1
B 15.00 . 1
C 15.00 . 1
Total 16.33 2.309 3
Column 2 A 12.00 . 1
B 18.00 . 1
C 12.00 . 1
Total 14.00 3.464 3
Column 3 A 18.00 . 1
B 25.00 . 1
C 25.00 . 1
Total 22.67 4.041 3
Total A 16.33 3.786 3
B 19.33 5.132 3
C 17.33 6.807 3
Total 17.67 4.848 9

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects


Dependent Variable: Values
Type III Sum of
Source Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 183.333 a
6 30.556 13.095 .073
Intercept 2809.000 1 2809.000 1203.857 .001
Row 48.667 2 24.333 10.429 .087
Column 120.667 2 60.333 25.857 .037
Treatment 14.000 2 7.000 3.000 .250
Error 4.667 2 2.333
Total 2997.000 9
Corrected Total 188.000 8

a. R Squared = .975 (Adjusted R Squared = .901)


Lack of Fit Tests
Dependent Variable: Values
Source Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Lack of Fit 4.667 2 2.333 . .
Pure Error .000 0 .

Post Hoc Tests

There are three rows(r1,r2,r3)

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Values
Tukey HSD
(I) There are three (J) There are three Mean Difference
rows(r1,r2,r3) rows(r1,r2,r3) (I-J) Std. Error Sig.
Row 1 Row 2 -2.33 1.247 .342
Row 3 -5.67 1.247 .081
Row 2 Row 1 2.33 1.247 .342
Row 3 -3.33 1.247 .203
Row 3 Row 1 5.67 1.247 .081
Row 2 3.33 1.247 .203

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Values
Tukey HSD
95% Confidence Interval
(I) There are three rows(r1,r2,r3) (J) There are three rows(r1,r2,r3) Lower Bound Upper Bound
Row 1 Row 2 -9.68 5.01
Row 3 -13.01 1.68
Row 2 Row 1 -5.01 9.68
Row 3 -10.68 4.01
Row 3 Row 1 -1.68 13.01
Row 2 -4.01 10.68

Based on observed means.


The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 2.333.
Homogeneous Subsets
Values
Tukey HSD a,b

There are three Subset


rows(r1,r2,r3) N 1
Row 1 3 15.00
Row 2 3 17.33
Row 3 3 20.67
Sig. .081

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are


displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 2.333.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.

There are three columns(c1,c2,c3)


Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Values
Tukey HSD
(I) There are three (J) There are three Mean Difference
columns(c1,c2,c3) columns(c1,c2,c3) (I-J) Std. Error Sig.
Column 1 Column 2 2.33 1.247 .342
Column 3 -6.33 1.247 .066
Column 2 Column 1 -2.33 1.247 .342
Column 3 -8.67 *
1.247 .036
Column 3 Column 1 6.33 1.247 .066
Column 2 8.67 *
1.247 .036

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Values
Tukey HSD
(I) There are three (J) There are three 95% Confidence Interval
columns(c1,c2,c3) columns(c1,c2,c3) Lower Bound Upper Bound
Column 1 Column 2 -5.01 9.68
Column 3 -13.68 1.01
Column 2 Column 1 -9.68 5.01
Column 3 -16.01 -1.32
Column 3 Column 1 -1.01 13.68
Column 2 1.32 16.01
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 2.333.
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.

Homogeneous Subsets
Values
Tukey HSD a,b

There are three Subset


columns(c1,c2,c3) N 1 2
Column 2 3 14.00
Column 1 3 16.33 16.33
Column 3 3 22.67
Sig. .342 .066

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.


Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 2.333.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.

There are three treatments(A,B,C)


Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Values
Tukey HSD
(I) There are three (J) There are three Mean Difference
treatments(A,B,C) treatments(A,B,C) (I-J) Std. Error Sig.
A B -3.00 1.247 .240
C -1.00 1.247 .739
B A 3.00 1.247 .240
C 2.00 1.247 .415
C A 1.00 1.247 .739
B -2.00 1.247 .415

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Values
Tukey HSD
(I) There are three (J) There are three 95% Confidence Interval
treatments(A,B,C) treatments(A,B,C) Lower Bound Upper Bound
A B -10.35 4.35
C -8.35 6.35
B A -4.35 10.35
C -5.35 9.35
C A -6.35 8.35
B -9.35 5.35
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 2.333.

Homogeneous Subsets

Values
Tukey HSD a,b

There are three Subset


treatments(A,B,C) N 1
A 3 16.33
C 3 17.33
B 3 19.33
Sig. .240

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are


displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 2.333.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
Profile Plots
Decision:
For Treatments, p-value = 0.466 > α = 0.05.
So, we accept H0T and reject H1T.

For row, p-value = 0.882 > α = 0.05.


So, we accept H0R and reject H1R.

And, for column p-value = 0.758 > α = 0.05.


So, we accept H0C and reject H1C.

CONCLUSION:
Therefore, there is no significant difference between treatments , there is no significant difference between rows.
Likewise, there is no significant difference between columns.

You might also like