Structure and Functions of Indian Legislature
Structure and Functions of Indian Legislature
o President of India
President is an integral part of Parliament but does not sit or par cipate in daily
proceedings.
Speaker: Presides over Lok Sabha, maintains order, decides on money bills.
o Can authorize Parliament to make laws on State List (Ar cle 249).
Rajya Sabha can only recommend amendments within 14 days; Lok Sabha may accept or
reject recommenda ons.
President can either assent or send it back for reconsidera on, but cannot reject.
▪ Financial Bills
Speaker (for Lok Sabha) and Chairman (for Rajya Sabha) decide disqualifica on.
Minimum strength: 60 members (excep ons for small states like Sikkim, Goa).
Indirectly elected.
Strength: About 1/3rd of Assembly, not exceeding 1/3rd of Assembly strength (Ar cles 171).
Similar to Parliament.
In bicameral states, Council can delay a bill for 14 days but cannot reject.
Lok Sabha = Lower House (direct elec on), Rajya Sabha = Upper House (indirect
elec on).
I'm glad you're keeping the momentum! Here's your next set of notes:
Vice President
Prime Minister
Council of Ministers
A orney General of India (not men oned in the heading but part of Execu ve)
President of India
1. Execu ve Powers:
o Appoints Prime Minister, other Ministers, Governors, CAG, UPSC members, etc.
2. Legisla ve Powers:
3. Judicial Powers:
o Appoints judges.
4. Emergency Powers:
When Parliament is not in session, President can promulgate an ordinance having force
of law.
PM is appointed by the President, usually the leader of the majority party in Lok Sabha.
▪ Collec ve Responsibility
If Lok Sabha passes no-confidence mo on, all Ministers including PM must resign.
Chief Minister
Council of Ministers
Must act as a nominal head, func oning under advice of State Council of Ministers.
▪ Execu ve Powers:
Appoints Chief Minister and Ministers, Advocate General, State Elec on Commissioner,
etc.
▪ Legisla ve Powers:
Advises Governor.
Leader of Legisla ve Assembly (if a member).
It must be laid before the legislature and will cease a er 6 weeks from its reassembly
unless approved.
Summary Pointers
Composed of:
Appointed by the President, following consulta on with CJI and senior judges
(Collegium System).
Qualifica ons for Appointment
Ci zen of India.
o Requires special majority in both Houses under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.
Disputes between:
Can issue writs (Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibi on, Cer orari, Quo-Warranto) for
enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
Known as the “Protector and Guarantor of Fundamental Rights”.
Doctrine of Judicial Review – Court can review legisla ve and execu ve ac ons.
Judicial Ac vism & PIL – Opened doors to Public Interest Li ga on, liberal
interpreta on of rights.
Each State has a High Court; some HC serve mul ple states (e.g., Punjab & Haryana).
Composed of:
▪ Jurisdic on
o Wider than SC’s under Art. 32 – can issue writs for legal and fundamental rights.
Appointment & Tenure (Ar cle 217)
Same process for removal (though no formal impeachment for High Court judges).
Structure
High Courts exercise administra ve and disciplinary control over subordinate judiciary.
Judicial Review
Certain issues (e.g., foreign affairs, policy decisions) are non-jus ciable.
Independence of Judiciary
Ensured by:
Any person can approach the court on behalf of a vic m or for public cause.
Famous cases: Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corp.
Ar cle 32 226
Parliament may enact laws for “the whole or any part of India.”
State Legislatures may make laws for their own State territory.
In prac ce, this allows uniform na onal legisla on (e.g., penal laws) while preserving State
autonomy within borders.
Legisla ve subjects are divided by the Seventh Schedule into three Lists:
o Contains 47 subjects: Educa on, Marriage & Divorce, Forests, Trade Unions,
Electricity, Criminal Law.
Key point: In case of conflict between a Central and State law on a Concurrent List subject,
Central law prevails (Ar cle 254).
Even though certain subjects are in the State List, Parliament can step in under specific
circumstances:
o Two or more States may pass iden cal resolu ons reques ng Parliament to
legislate on a par cular State List subject; the resul ng Central law applies only
to those consen ng States, unless extended later by other States.
These provisions balance the need for na onal uniformity (e.g., trade, defence) against States’
cons tu onal autonomy.
o If a State law on a Concurrent List subject contradicts a Central law, Central law
prevails, and the State law is void to the extent of inconsistency.
Excep on:
o A State law reserved for Presiden al assent, if assented to, can prevail within
that State even if it conflicts with earlier Central law—unless Parliament
subsequently overrides it.
This hierarchy ensures coherent na onal policy while allowing States a limited space to
innovate, subject to Presiden al oversight.
The Cons tu on imposes on States an obliga on to implement Union laws and empowers the
Centre to supervise and direct State execu ves, ensuring uniform applica on of legisla on
across India (Ar cle 256) and placing reasonable limits on State ac on so as not to impede
Union power (Ar cle 257).
Ar cle 256
“The execu ve power of every State shall be so exercised as to ensure compliance with
the laws made by Parliament and any exis ng laws which apply in that State; and the
execu ve power of the Union shall extend to the giving of such direc ons to a State as
may appear to the Government of India to be necessary for that purpose.”
o Ensures State execu ves implement both Parliamentary and pre-exis ng laws
without fail.
o Grants the Union power to issue direc ons to States to secure uniform
enforcement.
Ar cle 257
Empowers the Union to issue direc ves to any State “if, in the opinion of the President,
it is necessary in the public interest,” and prohibits State ac on that would impede or
prejudice Union execu ve func ons.
o Maintains the federal balance, allowing Central interven on only when essen al.
Ar cle 258(1)
Notwithstanding any other provision, the President may, with the consent of a State
Government, entrust to that Government or its officers any func on rela ng to a Union
subject, condi onally or uncondi onal.
Key features:
Ar cle 262
Parliament may legislate for adjudica on of any dispute regarding use, distribu on, or
control of waters of inter-State rivers or valleys, and may bar all courts from such
jurisdic on.
Ar cle 263
“If the President is of the opinion that public interests would be served by the
establishment of a Council for inquiry and advice on inter-State disputes,” the President
may cons tute an Inter-State Council by order.
Ar cle 268
Du es like stamp du es are levied by the Union but collected and appropriated by the
States.
Ar cle 269
Certain taxes (e.g., estate duty, succession duty, terminal taxes on goods/passengers) are
levied and collected by the Union but assigned wholly to the States.
Ar cle 270
All other Union-List taxes (except under Ar cles 268–269, 271, and specific cesses) are
levied and collected by the Union and distributed between Centre and States as per
parliamentary law.
Ar cle 271
Parliament may impose a surcharge on du es and taxes for Union purposes, collected
by the Union but assigned to the State.
Ar cle 274
Prior recommenda on of the President is required for any bill affec ng taxa on in
which States are interested.
Ar cle 275
Parliament may provide grants-in-aid charged on the Consolidated Fund of India to
States deemed in need of assistance, with differing sums for different States.
The President cons tutes a Finance Commission every five years, comprising a
Chairman and four members, to recommend:
Ar cle 292
The Union may borrow upon the security of the Consolidated Fund of India, within
limits fixed by Parliament, and give guarantees within such limits.
Ar cle 293
A State may borrow within India on its Consolidated Fund, subject to limits fixed by its
Legislature; but it requires Union consent to borrow if any earlier Union loan or
guarantee is outstanding.
Essence: When two provisions appear to conflict, they must be read together so that
each retains effect, rather than striking one down.
Why it ma ers: Preserves the coherence and integrity of the whole Cons tu on.
Applica on: If a State law seems to clash with a Central law on a Concurrent List subject,
courts a empt to reconcile them before declaring any repugnancy.
Essence: Focuses on the “true character” (pith) of a law—its real substance—rather than
its form.
Why it ma ers: Determines whether a law falls within a legislature’s competence (Union
or State).
Key case: State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara — law imposing tax on margarine held valid as
mainly a tax on vegetable oil, not a colourable a empt to invade State List.
3. Doctrine of Repugnancy (Ar cle 254)
Essence: On Concurrent List subjects, if a State law directly conflicts with an exis ng
Central law, the Central law prevails and the State law is void to the extent of conflict.
Excep on: A State law reserved for the President’s assent and so assented can prevail
locally unless Parliament later overrides it.
Effect: Maintains uniformity on shared subjects while allowing limited State innova on.
Essence: Legislatures may exercise powers not expressly granted if they are logical
extensions of their express powers.
Why it ma ers: Fills gaps where necessary to give effect to cons tu onal func ons.
Example: Parliament’s power to establish statutory bodies to carry out its express
legisla ve mandates.
Essence: A legislature may enact laws incidental to or necessary for implemen ng its
express powers.
Why it ma ers: Prevents a narrow reading that would frustrate cons tu onal
objec ves.
Key case: Union of India v. Deoki Nandan Aggarwal — upheld Centre’s power to make
rules incidental to taxa on.
Essence: Powers expressly given to one authority imply prohibi on on another authority
exercising those powers.
Why it ma ers: Enforces the separa on of powers and respect for jurisdic onal limits.
Example: Once Parliament has exclusive power over defense, States cannot legislate on
it even if not expressly forbidden.
7. Doctrine of Occupied Field
Key case: K.C. Gajapa Narayan Deo v. Orissa — Central labour law regime held to
occupy the field, displacing State laws.
Essence: A legislature cannot do indirectly (in form) what it cannot do directly (in
substance).
Why it ma ers: Detects and strikes down disguised a empts to exceed cons tu onal
competence.
Example: A law tled as “regula on” but aimed at raising revenue (State cannot frame
revenue laws on Union List subjects).
Essence: A law is valid if it has a sufficient connec on (nexus) to the territory of the
legislature enac ng it.
Example: Consumer protec on law applied to manufacturers outside the State if their
goods enter the State market.
Essence: If part of a statute is uncons tu onal, that part can be struck down (severed)
while leaving the rest intact, provided the remainder can s ll func on as intended.
Essence: When courts change an interpreta on, the new rule applies only to future
cases (not retroac vely), unless the court orders otherwise.
Why it ma ers: Protects exis ng legal and contractual expecta ons from sudden shi s
in law.
Example: In certain tax or contract disputes, the Supreme Court has expressly made its
ruling prospec ve.
Essence: A pre-cons tu onal law inconsistent with Fundamental Rights does not vanish
completely but remains “eclipsed”—inopera ve while the inconsistency persists.
Why it ma ers: Allows revival of old laws if the cons tu onal barrier is later removed or
amended.
Key point: The law is in the “penumbra” un l the offending part of the Cons tu on is
amended or struck down.
Defini on: A proclama on that “the security of India or any part thereof is threatened by war
or external aggression or armed rebellion.”
1. Grounds
Armed Rebellion: Violent uprising—even if it falls short of “insurrec on” in the old
wording (44th Amendment replaced “internal disturbance” with “armed rebellion” to
ghten scope).
2. Procedure
Ini a on: President acts only on the wri en advice of the Union Cabinet (i.e., Prime
Minister and Council of Ministers).
Proclama on: Issued by the President; must specify which of the three grounds applies
and may cover all of India or specified parts.
Parliamentary Approval:
Dura on:
Revoca on: President may revoke at any me by issuing a revoca on proclama on;
cessa on also occurs if not approved a er six months.
3. Effects
Centre can direct State execu ves on any ma er (Ar cle 355).
Fundamental Rights:
o Other rights (e.g., Ar cle 21) may be restricted by law, but core rights remain
jus ciable.
Distribu on of Powers:
Judicial Review:
o Courts may review whether procedure (e.g., Cabinet advice, parliamentary
approval) has been followed, but not the “sufficiency” of grounds (Kesavananda
Bhara ).
o Protects Ar cle 20 (criminal guarantees) and Ar cle 21 (life and personal liberty)
from suspension.
Judicial Oversight:
o Proclama on and its extensions have been subject to limited review, ensuring
procedural compliance.
Defini on: President may take over a State’s governance if “the government of the State cannot
be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Cons tu on.”
1. Grounds
o Governor’s report, or
2. Procedure
Legisla ve Approval:
Dura on:
Revoca on: President can revoke the proclama on at any me by issuing a revoca on.
3. Effects
State Legislature:
Financial Management:
o Laid down that floor test in the Assembly is essen al before dismissal.
Defini on: Declared if “the financial stability or credit of India or any part thereof is
threatened.”
1. Grounds
2. Procedure
Proclama on: By the President on Ministerial advice.
Parliamentary Approval:
Dura on:
3. Effects
Reduce salaries and allowances of all or any classes of persons serving the
State (including judges).
Absence of explicit me limits makes it the most potent emergency—but poli cal and
judicial checks act as de facto safeguards.
The Cons tu on provides a flexible yet controlled method to update its text:
Ini a on
1. Simple Majority (e.g., crea on of new States under Ar cle 3) – requires only a majority
of members present and vo ng in each House.
3. State Ra fica on – for certain federal provisions (e.g., Ar cles 54, 55, 73, 163, Chapter
on High Courts, distribu on of powers, amendment procedure itself), a er passage by
Parliament, the Bill must be ra fied by at least half of the State Legislatures.
Presiden al Assent
o Once duly passed and ra fied (if required), the Bill goes to the President, whose
assent is obligatory and cannot be withheld or returned.
Entrenchment
o No special “lock-in” clause beyond the ra fica on requirement; but the Basic
Structure doctrine places substan ve limits (below).
Early Tension
o Shankari Prasad (1951) & Sajjan Singh (1965): Court held Parliament’s amending
power unlimited (even Fundamental Rights).
o Key Holding: Parliament’s power under Ar cle 368 is very wide, but it cannot
alter the “basic structure” or essen al features of the Cons tu on.
o Vote Split: 7–6; no exhaus ve list of basic features was given, but principles like
rule of law, separa on of powers, federalism, judicial review, dignity of the
individual were recognized.
Minerva Mills (1980)
o Reaffirmed that judicial review and balance between Parts III and IV
(Fundamental Rights and Direc ve Principles) are basic features.
Subsequent Cases
Minerva Mills 1980 Cemented judicial review & balance of rights as basic
Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain 1975 Free and fair elec ons as basic feature
Kihoto Hollohan 1992 Legislature’s free speech as basic, but upheld defec on law
Takeaway: While Parliament can amend nearly any provision, it may not destroy or damage the
Cons tu on’s essen al framework—its “basic structure.”
The State, through its various organs, enjoys the power to enter contracts and is bound by the
same rules that govern private par es:
Authority to Contract
o All contracts on behalf of the Union or a State must be made in the name of the
President (for Union) or Governor (for State) and executed by persons duly
authorized (ministries, departments, officers).
Binding Nature
o A valid contract binds the State “as if it were a natural person of full age and
capacity,” except where expressly restricted by law.
o State cannot contract beyond its legal competence (ultra vires doctrine applies).
o If entered without authority, contracts are void and cannot be ra fied later.
Key Point
o Ar cle 299 seals the doctrine of privity and sovereign’s contractual obliga ons,
ensuring public authori es cannot evade contractual responsibili es.
Originally borrowing the Bri sh Crown Proceedings model, the Cons tu on makes the State
liable in tort under defined circumstances:
State as a ‘Person’
o The Union or a State “shall be sued” in accordance with law in the same manner
as a private person, subject to procedural safeguards.
Scope of Liability
o Discre onary acts (e.g., policy decisions) generally immune; ministerial acts
(rou ne administra ve func ons) are not.
Procedure
o Suits against the State follow special rules (e.g., shorter limita on period, no ce
requirements).
Landmark Illustra ons
o State of Rajasthan v. Vidyawa : State liability for torts of public servants held
analogous to private employer’s vicarious liability.
o Usman Khan v. State of Bihar: Govt. held liable for wrongful deten on (breach of
personal liberty).