TEACHER CLASSROOM OBSERVATION RATING CHECKLIST FOR DEMONSTRATION TEACHING
Adopted from DepEd with slight revision
For PrEd 200 (Teaching Internship)
STUDENT TEACHER: JAYE-ANN PACALDO PALAD School: ISABEL NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL Start: _____________
Grade: 9-POMELO Date: ___________________ Finish: ____________ Subject: MAPEH Objective:
___________________________________________
I. CLASSROOM PREPARATION/MANAGEMENT
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS P US S VS O REMARKS/AGREEMENTS
1. Classroom was structured to enhance learning
(seating arrangement, light, ventilation, etc.) 2 4 6 8 10
2. All necessary visual aids/instructional
materials were prepared ahead of time. 2 4 6 8 10
3. Boardwork was prepared before classes
started. 2 4 6 8 10
4. Teacher observed proper time management. 2 4 6 8 10
5. Maintained order and discipline in classroom. 2 4 6 8 10
Sub- total
of The Teacher points
: 1. Clearly formulated the objective of the lesson. 2 4 6 8 10
2. Attained objectives of the lesson. 2 4 6 8 10
3. Showed proficiency in required language of
instruction. 2 4 6 8 10
4. Presented the lesson in a way which captured the
interest of the learners. 2 4 6 8 10
5. Used real life situations, concrete objects, print
and non-print materials in the
presentation/development of the lesson. 2 4 6 8 10
6. Considered interweaving of task/skill/process and
content. 2 4 6 8 10
7. Provided meaningful connections between and
among learning opportunities, prior knowledge,
relevant events and the learner’s lives and 2 4 6 8 10
experiences.
8. Employed/utilized integrative strategies
___Integration of values in the subject taught
___Integration of Science and Health concepts in
English as content
___Integration of SK/HKS concepts in Filipino as 2 4 6 8 10
content
___Integration of EPP, HKS and MSEP
___Integration across learning areas
9. Provided varied activities to encourage
participation of everyone especially slow learners. 2 4 6 8 10
10. Provided activities for interactive/group
work/cooperative learning. 2 4 6 8 10
11. Acted as facilitator during class discussion. 2 4 6 8 10
12. Provided varied learning activities congruent to
the objective of the lesson. 2 4 6 8 10
[Link]
Recognized
(14-Aug-25) pupil’s/students’ individual
differences and provided activities for
____remediation
____reinforcement 2 4 6 8 10
_____+ _____+____ +____
+___ = _______ /5= _____
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (Total points)
II. TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS
RRSevenorio (14-Aug-25)
____ enrichment
14. Asked questions that developed critical thinking
skills, e.g. open ended questions. 2 4 6 8 10
15. Gave homework as a follow-up of the lesson
o Used textbooks/materials o
Clearly/appropriately
o Used instructional materials creatively to get 2 4 6 8 10
ideas across
16. Showed mastery of the subject matter 2 4 6 8 10
The Pupils/Students
17. Were actively engaged throughout the lesson 2 4 6 8 10
18. Asked/answered questions reflecting Higher
Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) 2 4 6 8 10
19. Were generally happy in class 2 4 6 8 10
20. Were generally motivated to learn more 2 4 6 8 10
Sub-total of points ___+ ___+ ___ + ___ + ____ = ______ /20 = ________
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (Total points)
III. ASSESSMENT OF PUPILS/STUDENTS
[Link] was evaluated through seatwork
exercises/paper and pencil test 2 4 6 8 10
2. Learning was evaluated through authentic
assessment. 2 4 6 8 10
3. Learners’ other needs were diagnosed after the
lesson. 2 4 6 8 10
4. The lesson was assessed to determine if the
objective was attained within the allotted time. 2 4 6 8 10
Sub-total of points ___ +___ + ___+____+____ = ____/4 = _____
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (Total points)
IV. CLASROOM INTERACTION
Rating Scale 8.60-10.0 6.60- SUMMARY OF RATING Weight Rating Points
10- Outstanding 8.59 4.60-6.59
I. (a) (b) (axb)
8- Very Satisfactory 2.60-4.59
II. Classroom Prep. /Mgt. 20 % _____ _____
6-Satisfactory 2.59 & Below
. III. IV. Teaching-Learning Process 50% _____ _____
4-Unsatisfactory
Pupil Assessment 20% _____ _____
Classroom Interaction 10% _____ _____
Observed/Rated by: _________________________
Conforme: Cooperating Teacher
Student Teacher Observed/Rated
Date: ______________________
Date: ________________________
RATE THE TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS AS A WHOLE IN TERMS OF INTERACTION
[Link]/Student-Teacher Interaction 2 4 6 8 10
2. Pupil/Student-Pupil/Student Interaction 2 4 6 8 10
3. Pupil/Student-Materials Interaction 2 4 6 8 10
Sub-total of points ___+____+____+___+_____ = _____ /3 = ______
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (Total points)
V. OTHER COMMENTS ON THE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION
RRSevenorio (14-Aug-25)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_ _____________________________________________________________
_____________________________
OBSERVATION SHEET
TEACHER: SCHOOL: DISTRICT: START:
GRADE/YEAR: SUBJECT: DATE: FINISH:
OBJECTIVE:
WHAT WENT WELL/STRENGTH WHAT DID NOT GO WELL/AREAS FOR
(+) IMPROVEMENT
(-)
RRSevenorio (14-Aug-25)
RRSevenorio (14-Aug-25)
Observed by: __________________________ Date : _____________________
Position : __________________________ School : _____________________
Conforme:
_____________________________
Student Teacher Observed
RRSevenorio (14-Aug-25)