FINAL EXAMINATION IN INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATION & IMMERSION
RESEARCH FINAL DEFENSE EVALUATION RUBRIC
Direction: Rate the document by using the following criteria:
5 – Very Good
4 - Good
3 - Fair
2 - Poor
1 – Needs Improvement
GROUP
INDICATOR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Title Formulation Major variables, goal, respondents, or
subjects are clearly stated.
Introduction Rationale, literature, statistics and
purpose and format are adequate.
Statement of the General problem, specific problems, and
problem format are correctly formulated.
Scope and Delimitation Major variables, sub-variables, indicators,
of the Study settings, and format are mentioned
properly.
Significance of the Beneficiaries and the benefits are
Study discussed completely.
Related Literature/ All variables and sub-variables have
Related Studies adequate literature.
Thesis statement, date, place, findings,
and relationship are discussed.
Conceptual Framework 81% - 100% accurate variables are
and Paradigm included. Relationships are discussed and
symbols are used.
Hypothesis/Assumption The null hypothesis, and assumptions are
mentioned properly.
Definition of Terms All terms are operationally defined.
Research Design Methodology, types, definition,
explanation and rationale are discussed.
Population Population, samples, sampling method,
rationale and profile are discussed.
Instrument of the Study Instrument, basis, explanation and
description are discussed.
Methodology The paper indicated how the data were
analyzed and reported; it specified the
qualitative and/or quantitative methods
that were used in analyzing the data
gathered for the research.
Validity and Reliability Method, basis, and explanation are
discussed.
Statistical Tool, basis, and explanation are
discussed.
FINAL EXAMINATION IN INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATION & IMMERSION
RESEARCH FINAL DEFENSE EVALUATION RUBRIC
Research Title:_______________________________________________Group Number: ____________
Comments & Suggestions:
Please take a moment to select the candidates you believe deserve recognition for their
outstanding contributions to the field. Your choices could help shape their future and celebrate
their hard work and innovation.
Female Best Research Presenter __________________________________________
Male Best Research Presenter __________________________________________
Female Best Research Defender __________________________________________
Male Best Research Defender __________________________________________
Courage to Talk Defender __________________________________________
Phenomenal Research Proponent Award __________________________________________
Best in Research Presentation __________________________________________
Best in Research Paper __________________________________________
Outstanding in Research Manuscript __________________________________________
Most Cooperative Group __________________________________________
_________________________________________
Research Panel
FINAL EXAMINATION IN INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATION & IMMERSION
RESEARCH FINAL DEFENSE EVALUATION RUBRIC
Research Title:_______________________________________________Group Number: ____________
Direction: Rate the document by using the following criteria:
5 – Very Good 4 – Good 3 – Fair 2 – Poor 1– Needs Improvement
I. Actual
Defense
Question 1
Question 2
Question 3
Question 4
Question 5
Question 6
II. Personality
Confidence
Communication Skills
Teamwork
Mastery
Comments & Suggestions:
_________________________________________
Research Panel
FINAL EXAMINATION IN INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATION & IMMERSION
RESEARCH FINAL DEFENSE EVALUATION RUBRIC
F𝐑𝐄𝐐𝐔𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐋𝐘 𝐀𝐒𝐊𝐄𝐃 𝐐𝐔𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒
1. In a few sentences, can you tell us what your study is all about?
2. What is your motivation for this study?
3. Did you bridge any gap from your study?
4. Why did you choose this title?
5. What is the significance of the study?
6. What limitations did you encounter?
7. How did you establish the limits around the scope of your data collection?
8. What is the scope of the study?
9. What are the main issues and debates in this subject area?
10. What were the crucial research decisions you made?
11. What is the research problem? What phenomenon are you trying to?
explain/understand?
12. Who will be most interested in your work?
13. Is your literature current (up-to-date)?
14. Have you obtained the local literature on this topic?
15. Have you included in the literature the major theories, concepts, factors, and variables connected with your
research?
16. Have you collected and reviewed enough literature? Have you been exhaustive in your literature search?
17. What method or strategy did you use for your analysis* technique * for coding analyzing and presenting data?
18. What statistical tool/s are you using to test each hypothesis?
19. What are the expected relationships between the independent variables and the dependent variables? Why do
you expect these relationships?
20. What sampling technique are you going to use? Why? How are you going to choose the sample from the
population?
21. What is the population of your sample? What list/directory you are using?
22. What are your dependent variables?
23. What are your independent variables?
24. Are there moderating/ mediating variables? Why are these moderators/ mediating?
25. Where did you get your research framework? Is it your own? Why this framework?
26. How do you justify this framework?
27. Why choose this method?
28. What was the most challenging aspect of your research?
29. What Methods or Sampling Technique did you employ?
30. Why did you use this research methodology? What did you gain from it?
31. What were the main ethical issues of conducting this research?
32. What is your measurement Instrument?
33. What are your research variables?
34. What are the contributions of your study to society or to the study’s relevant field?
35. What is the rationale? (reasons and incidence) of your research?
36. What is the paradigm of your study?
37. What is the setting of your study?
38. What is your research design? Explain.
39. Who are the respondents of your study?
40. How will you select your respondents?
41. How did you come up with your instrument?
42. How will you gather your data?
43. How do you plan to present, analyze and interpret the results of your study?
44. What statistical treatment will you apply?
Presenter 1
Research Title: ____________________________________________________________________________
Comments & Suggestions:
________________________________________________
Panel’s Name & Signature
REACTION PAPER RUBRIC
Direction: Rate the document by using the following criteria:
5 – Very Good
4 - Good
3 - Fair
2 - Poor
1 – Needs Improvement
NAME OF STUDENT
INDICATOR
Introduction Introduces theme of paper, and articles
using rich and descriptive language.
Information summary Provides accurate and descriptive, concise
summary of article information,
effectively summarizing main points of
articles.
Critique Thoughtfully critiques author(s)’ main
points, using evidence to back up
arguments. Critique is insightful and
thorough.
Conclusion Conclusion presents particularly strong or
compelling closing statement that ties
closely to introduction
Organization Information is organized in a fully
effective manner; presents strong
introduction, expressive body, and
purposeful conclusion
Sentence Structure Sentences effectively constructed with no
grammatical errors
Mechanics Spelling, capitalization and punctuation
error‐ free.
MYNNA T. BARON
Research Teacher