• Introduction:-

Human Rights are the inalienable rights of people . As a human being

human rights are provided equal with dignity .As per Hobbes" one's
Natural rights are one's Natural power" It makes sense that ,human
rights are the weapon in the hands of human beings ;that no power
have rights to take away the Human Rights.
Human rights are universally recognized moral principles or norms
that establish standards of human behavior and are often protected
by both national and international laws. These rights are considered
inherent and inalienable, meaning they belong to every individual
simply by virtue of being human, regardless of characteristics like
nationality, ethnicity, religion, or socioeconomic status. They
encompass a broad range of civil, political, economic, social, and
cultural rights, such as the right to life, freedom of expression,
protection against enslavement, and right to [Link] modern
concept of human rights gained significant prominence after World
War II, particularly in response to the atrocities of the Holocaust,
leading to the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR) by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. This
document outlined a comprehensive framework of rights that
countries are encouraged to protect, setting a global standard for
human dignity, freedom, and justice. The UDHR has since inspired

1
numerous international treaties and national laws designed to
promote and safeguard these rights globally.

While the principle of universal human rights is widely accepted,

debates persist regarding which rights should take precedence, how
they should be implemented, and their applicability in different
cultural contexts. Criticisms often arise from perspectives like cultural
relativism, which argue that individual human rights are
inappropriate for societies that prioritise a communal or collectivist
identity, and may conflict with certain cultural or traditional practices.

Nonetheless, human rights remain a central focus in international

relations and legal frameworks, supported by institutions such as the
United Nations, various non-governmental organizations, and
national bodies dedicated to monitoring and enforcing human rights
standards [Link], dignity). The jurist Vázquez de
Menchaca, starting from an individualist philosophy, was decisive in
the dissemination of the term iura naturalia. This natural law thinking
was supported by contact with American civilizations and the debate
that took place in Castile about the just titles of the conquest and, in
particular, the nature of the indigenous people. In the Castilian
colonization of America, it is often stated, measures were applied in
which the germs of the idea of Human Rights are present, debated in
the well-known Valladolid Debate that took place in 1550 and 1551.
The thought of the School of Salamanca, especially through Francisco
Vitoria, also contributed to the promotion of European natural law.

From this foundation, the modern human rights arguments emerged

over the latter half of the 20th century. Magna Carta is an English

2
charter originally issued in 1215 which influenced the development
of the common law and many later constitutional documents related
to human rights, such as the 1689 English Bill of Rights, the 1789
United States Constitution, and the 1791 United States Bill of Rights.

17th century English philosopher John Locke discussed natural rights

in his work, identifying them as being "life, liberty, and estate
(property)", and argued that such fundamental rights could not be
surrendered in the social contract. In Britain in 1689, the English Bill
of Rights and the Scottish Claim of Right each made a range of
oppressive governmental actions, [Link] major revolutions
occurred during the 18th century, in the United States (1776) and in
France (1789), leading to the United States
Declaration of Independence and the French Declaration of the
Rights of Man and of the Citizen respectively, both of which
articulated certain human rights. Additionally, the Virginia
Declaration of Rights of 1776 encoded into law a number of
fundamental civil rights and civil freedoms.

3
 • Introduction to Latur District

Latur district is one of the most significant regions within the

Marathwada area in southeastern Maharashtra, India. This region is
characterized by its diversified demographic and economic profile
with agriculture as a major occupation for most people. Small and
medium-scale industries in the district also play an important role in
the overall economic development. The Latur district is also known
for its strength in overcoming hardships, like drought and scarcity of
resources. This gives an insight into the spirit of community. The
location and natural resources influence the socio-economic
structure of the district; efforts through education, rural
development, and infrastructure attempt to overcome disparities in
existence. This survey is aimed at comprehensively assessing human

4
rights in Latur district by looking at access to important services,
economic opportunities, and quality of life, in order to create an
inclusive and equitable framework for development.

• Introduction to Latur City

Latur is a very important city in the region of Marathwada,

Maharashtra, India. This city has a population of about 5.5 lakh. Latur
is highly significant in terms of history and culture. It has become an
important center of education, agriculture, and trade. The soybean
and sugar industries here are booming, and Latur is famous for the
same. The district is also known for progressive education systems,
5
popularly called the "Latur Pattern," which has benchmarked
excellence in academics. This developed city has challenges with
issues of water scarcity and urban infrastructure growth, which is an
important area to gauge human rights in terms of availability of basic
resources, healthcare, and education. This survey assesses the
human rights landscape in Latur, identifying areas of improvement for
an equitable, inclusive environment among its citizens.

• significance of human rights

The Significance of Human Rights Human rights are the pillars that
hold a fair and equitable society. It refers to the fundamental
freedom and protections that each citizen deserves to enjoy, free
from restrictions of nationality, ethnicity, gender, and social class.
Universal and inalienable rights create a framework where dignity,
equality, and justice rule every nook and cranny of this earth.

1. Safeguard Dignity: Human rights protect people from The

being subjected to any form of humiliation or discrimination or
degradation. This would make human beings live with honor.

2. Promote Equality: Human rights prevent inequality of

opportunities and equality of rights. Human rights create a just
society in which, regardless of their conditions in life, all are treated
as equal before the law.

6
3. Preserve Freedoms: Human rights protect the fundamental
freedoms of speech, religion, and expression. The freedoms
empower people to live realistically and contribute meaningfully to
society.

4. Promote Social Stability: Inequalities and injustices normally

lead to conflict and restlessness. Human rights help stabilize this by
promoting fairness and justice, which are necessary for peace and
social harmony.

5. Empowering People: Human rights knowledge and practice

empower people to challenge oppression and advocate for good
change. This empowerment is crucial to foster active and informed
citizenship.

6. Quality Life: Human rights ensure essential needs such as

education, health, and a safe environment are available. It makes
sure that life is lived meaningfully with avenues for growth and
development.

Human rights are not just abstract principles that serve as concepts in
ideal construction. They are practical tools to build a more fair and
humane world. Of course, beyond individual benefits, they shape
communities and nations where everyone lives freely and in dignity.
Incorporating these rights into education, governance, and daily life
can bridge gaps in awareness and understanding, as highlighted in
your survey findings. This effort ensures that every individual is

7
empowered to protect their rights and contribute to a more
equitable society.

• Data Analysis, Interpretation and Findings

•Male-Female ratio of Respondent:-
Male Female
59% 41%

•Age Group of Respondent :-

Age
About 30 23%
30<age<50 45%
50<age<80 22%

8
•Education Qualification of Respondent:-
Education Qualification
Post -graduated 6%
BA 9%
[Link] 2%
12th 28%
10th passed out 41%
illiterate 14%

9
FIRST Query:-
How many People have heard the term Human Rights? We
got the following data:-
yes No
80% 20%

10
In the First Criteria we try to ascertain how many people have heard
the term Human Rights? Out of which 80% of people have idea of
human rights while other 20% have never heard about what the term
Human Rights mean. Here we also found that most of the educated
people were unaware about the term Human Right. This shows the
lack of knowledge in educated people.

Query 2:-
In the second questionnaire ,we try to inquire the basic
Understanding and concept about Human Rights .so we ask them,

According to you Human Rights are for whom? We gave them four
options :-
a. Human rights are for every citizen of India.
b. Human rights are only for rich people
c. Human rights are only given to government officers
d. Don’t Know
Human rights are for every 66%
citizen of India.

Human rights are only for rich 14%

people

11
Human rights are only given to 10%
government officers
Don’t know 10%

Out of all the respondents who said they have heard Human
rights, only 66% people are able to

give the right definition and meaning of the term. The remaining
people have given wrong interpretation of the term. So we can
confer that the awareness and clarity level of human rights is not
so high among the people. People are carrying typical perspective
about human rights, although they have heard the term of human
rights.

Query 3:-

12
In the third query, we asked them following question:- According
to you, should women be given equal right as men?
We got the following data:-

Yes No
91% 9%

As per the above query ,interestingly we found that 91% of people

responded that yes women should be given equal rights as men. Only
9% respondents oppose that idea, signifying that some portions still
carry a patriarchal narrow mindset regarding women status in
society.

Query 4:-

13
In fourth query, we asked them following question:- Which
Right Do You Know , provided by Indian Constitution?

On the above query, we got many responses as right to religion,

right to vote, right from slavery , right to live freely ,right to vote,
right to life, right to speech, I right to equality ,right to hold elections,
right to speak against government, and many more ;Which shows
that people are aware of some of there rights.
Query 5:-
In this query, we try to inquire about the following question:-
Who protect Rights? And gave them five option:- a. government
b .person itself c. society

d. All above
e. Don’t know
From the above option, we get the following data
Government 25%
Person itself 27%
Society 10%
All above 24%
Don’t know 14%

14
In this criterion we try to check who the people think can protect
human rights. Majority of people (27%) people held that it is duty
of the person itself to protect
human rights. Interestingly some portions of people also state that
Government (25%%) and civil society groups (10%) are responsible
for protecting human rights. However only 24% respondents have
the clear perspective that human rights protection should involve
all the actors- the state, the individual, the liberation groups, civil
society groups. We can confer that the proper conception of human
rights concept is still very little among the people. Majority of
people do have some knowledge or at least hear or use the term
the term human rights. But they lack of conceptual clarity about
the term ,In our survey it is found that 14% of total people have no
proper concept about who should protect human rights.

15
Query 6:-
In this query,we try to inquire about the following question:-
Do you think the Indian Constitution provide enough safe guard
and mechanisms to protect the Human Rights? We got the following
data:-
Yes No
78% 22%

From the above criterion, We have found that out of all the
respondents 78% held that constitution provide enough
mechanisms for the protection of human rights. That is just above
majority. 22% clearly said they don’t think Indian constitution
provides
enough mechanism. Out of this data, we can
Analyse that majority of people are happy and think the
constitution has done enough to protect human rights
Query 7:-

16
In this Query, we try to inquire about the following question

Do you think that adequate health and medicinal facilities are

provided by India? We got the following data:-

yes No
56% 44%

From the above analysis we can find that 56% of the people confer
that
India has provided adequate health and medicinal facilities while 44%
of people are opposing to the question as there is no adequate
health and medicinal facilities available in India . This shows that
India is lacking behind to provide adequate health facilities to the
citizens .

Query 8:-

17
 In this Query ,we try to inquire about the following question:-

Do you think that adequate education facilities are provided in India?

We got the following data:-
Yes No
61% 39%

form the above criterion, we can say that 39% of people are seeking
for education facilities due to there very condition of poverty while
61% of people favours the question that India has Provided adequate
education facilities. So ,it is must to look after the education facilities
of 39% of the people.

Query 9:-
In this Query, we try to inquire about the following question:-

18
Do you think that wrong policy of government of India can be openly
oppose?
We got the following data:-
Yes No
70% 30%

From the above criterion, we can clearly see that 70% of the people
confer that they can oppose government for implementing the wrong
policy which is more than the majority while other 30%of the people
are oppose to the question and says that we can't openly oppose
government.

Query 10:-
In this Query, we try to inquire about the following question:- Do
you think that all Citizens can contest election in India?
We got the following data:-
Yes No

19
67% 33%

In this criterion, we found that more than majority of people (67%)

thinks that they can contest election in India while other 33% of the
people opposed the question and answer No ;that as a Citizen they
can't contest election in India.

• Importance of Survey
A survey is a method of gathering relevant data from the
respondents. This information could include their opinions,
preferences, feedback or any other relevant details.
Survey have a vast array of use cases from collecting customers or
people feedback to gaining a better understanding of marketing, there
are several areas where Survey can be deployed. Survey are used for a
sample target audience to gather insights for a larger population.
You may have come across several types of Survey ranging from
market research Survey that gather important insights about the

20
target consumer to employees engagement Survey that track how
satisfied and engaged your staff feels at work.
Each Survey has a distinct objective, and realizing the true purpose
of Survey research will help you extract the most valuable data.
Conducting Survey offers numerous benefits to individuals and
organizations Survey can help to collect feedback, gauge customer
satisfaction, identify areas for improvement, gather insights and
opinions, and make informed decision. Survey also provides a mean of
obtaining quantitative data and can be conducted quickly and
efficiently.

• Objective of the Survey:

The survey is designed to:
1. Evaluate the overall level of awareness on human rights among
various sectors of the population in Latur.
2. Glean which sectors are relatively enlightened about human
rights and which are not.
3. Determine the social attitudes regarding gender equality and
fundamental rights such as freedom, equality, and justice.
4. Measure perceptions about existing frameworks in India that
protect human rights.
5. Examine knowledge about constitutional rights extended to
Indian citizens.
6. Raise opinions regarding other significant issues within society,
especially in respect to healthcare, education, and political
engagement.

21
7. Identify areas that require improvements and interventions
with the purpose of enhancing human rights awareness and practice.
8. Offer recommendations to lawmakers and educators to frame
focus-oriented sensitization campaigns and training methods.
9. Identify the role of gender and education level in human rights
awareness.
10. Collect feed-back regarding the perceived role of government
and other institutions in protecting human rights. These objectives
have a solid basis for understanding what human rights awareness is
and how it should be improved.

• Methodology of the Survey

This survey was conducted to measure the awareness of human rights

among a sample of 100 people in Latur City. The following
methodology was followed:
[Link]:

Total number of participants was 100.

Participants were randomly selected from the population. They were
chosen from all age groups, educational levels, and socioeconomic
backgrounds.
The male-to-female ratio was not set in advance. It was based on the
random selection process.

22
[Link] Team:
The survey was conducted by a team of 10 interviewers, each
responsible for interviewing 10 participants.
The interviewers were trained to ensure uniformity in the data
collection process and clarity in explaining the questions.

03. Survey Design:

A structured questionnaire consisting of 10 simple and direct
questions was designed.
Topics covered included:
Basic knowledge of human rights.
Awareness of constitutional rights.
Perceptions of gender equality.
Understanding of the roles of the government and society in
protecting human rights.

[Link] Collection Methodology:

Face-to-face interviews were conducted by the interviewers.
Public spaces such as markets, parks, and community centers were
chosen as locations to ensure accessibility and diversity in
participation.
Each interview lasted approximately 10 minutes.
Responses were recorded on paper or digitally for subsequent
analysis.

23
 4. Sampling Method:
A random sampling approach was used to ensure representation of
individuals from various educational and socio-economic
backgrounds.
Efforts were made to include participants with different levels of
education (e.g., illiterate, school-educated, graduates).

6. Data Analysis:
The responses were compiled and analyzed collectively to identify
patterns and trends.
Visual aids such as pie charts and bar graphs were created to
represent the data clearly.

7. Objective:
To evaluate the awareness of human rights among the general
population.
To identify strengths and gaps in public understanding and attitudes
toward human rights.
To generate insights that can guide educational and awareness
programs.

24
This methodology ensured a systematic and efficient approach to
gathering and analyzing data, providing a comprehensive view of
human rights awareness among 100 participants in Latur

• Conclusion of the survey

1. The survey underlines the significance of human rights

awareness and education for the cause of social justice and equality.
2. Human rights violations still occur despite improvement,
indicating the necessity of sustained advocacy and protection efforts.
3. The survey highlights the interrelationship of human rights;
economic, social, and cultural rights are inseparable from civil and
political rights.

Key Findings
1. Knowledge gap: Many respondents indicated ignorance of their
basic rights, and education and awareness programs are in order.
2. Violations still exist: Respondents narrated stories of
discrimination, inequality, and human rights abuses.
3. Institutional trust: Respondents expressed trust in institutions
like the judiciary and human rights commissions.

Recommendations

25
1. Strengthen education and awareness: Integrate human rights
education into school curricula and community programs.
2. Enhance institutional capacity: Provide training and resources
for institutions to effectively address human rights violations.
3. Promote inclusive policies: Develop policies addressing
discrimination and inequality.
Future Directions
1. Continued research: Monitor human rights trends and emerging
issues.
2. Community Engagement: Engage in partnership building with
civic society and community groups.
3. Policy Advocacy: Work with policymakers to strengthen human
rights protections. This is why the survey calls for human rights as
dignity, equality, and social justice. Collective efforts of governments,
institutions, and civil society are needed to fill the gaps and
challenges identified.
This study is a commendable step toward making Latur a more
informed and equitable society with a potential to inspire similar
initiatives in other regions.

• Review of the Report

The report gave an all-inclusive and proper assessment of the

understanding of human rights by the populace of Latur. Properly
structured and covered various basic knowledge in terms of human
rights, gender issues, constitutional rights, as well as people's attitudes

26
towards the roles of their governments in safeguarding rights. The
methodological approach applied involved random sampling for
diversity in response and face-toface interviews to ensure dependable
collection of data.

The survey tells a mixed tale of awareness on the core concepts of

human rights, with obvious gaps in understanding, even among
educated individuals. Insights into perceptions of gender equality and
the roles of institutions in society highlight both progress and
persistence of patriarchal attitudes. Facilitating analyses of healthcare
and education facilities provides valuable feedback regarding
infrastructural gaps, as does analysis of political rights, which pointed
toward a need for broader civic education.

The report becomes user-friendly and effective through visual aids like
pie charts and bar graphs, making the findings clear and accessible.
Nevertheless, the sample size for the survey is satisfactory for a
preliminary study but could be increased in further studies to
strengthen the generalization of the conclusions.

27
Acknowledgment

I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to the

contributors whose efforts made this survey possible:

[Link] NEHAL RAMKUMAR

[Link] RAHUL VINOD
3. TAMBOLI SANIYA ABDUL
4. DHUMAL RISHA PRADIP
[Link] ANIKET RAHUL
[Link] VYANKATESH SHRIKANT
[Link] PAYAL KALYAN
8. MANE PRAGATI
[Link] YOGITA DNYANESHWAR
[Link] ADITYA

MENTOR:
PROF. SHREEKRUSHNA PANCHAL SIR

28