0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views10 pages

Research Methodology: Methods vs. Methodology

Document about research methodology and practices in research

Uploaded by

Himal Bista
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views10 pages

Research Methodology: Methods vs. Methodology

Document about research methodology and practices in research

Uploaded by

Himal Bista
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Unit I: Conceptual Understanding of Research Methodology

1.1 Difference between Method and Methodology


* Method:
* Refers to the specific techniques, tools, or procedures used to collect and analyze data.
* It is the "how-to" part of research.
* Examples: Surveys, questionnaires, interviews, experiments, observations, content analysis.
* Methodology:
* Refers to the overall strategy, rationale, and philosophical underpinnings that guide a research
study.
* It is the "why" behind the chosen methods. It justifies the choice of methods by linking them
to the research questions and the broader research philosophy.
* It encompasses the theoretical analysis of the methods and principles associated with a branch
of knowledge.
* Example: Not just "using interviews," but explaining that a *phenomenological
methodology* was chosen to understand the lived experiences of participants, for which in-depth,
semi-structured interviews are the appropriate *method*.

Summary Table: Method vs. Methodology

| Basis of Difference | Method | Methodology |


|:|:|:|
| Meaning | Techniques for data collection & analysis | The science of understanding the procedures
of research |
| What it is? | A tool or technique | A justification or rationale |
| Scope | Narrow (specific part of research) | Wide (overall approach of research) |
| Concerned with | Conducting research | Ensuring the research is rigorous, valid, and reliable |
| Order | Follows methodology | Precedes the selection of methods |
1.2 Difference between Quantitative and Qualitative Research and its Triangulation
* Quantitative Research:
* Philosophy: Positivism. The world is objective and can be measured.
* Purpose: To quantify data, generalize results from a sample to a population, test theories and
hypotheses.
* Data: Numerical, statistical, measurable. (e.g., scores, percentages, graphs).
* Approach: Deductive (testing a theory).
* Methods: Surveys, experiments, structured observations.
* Analysis: Statistical analysis (e.g., mean, correlation, regression).
* Qualitative Research:
* Philosophy: Interpretivism, constructivism. Reality is socially constructed and subjective.
* Purpose: To understand concepts, experiences, and meanings in depth. To explore and
generate theories.
* Data: Textual, visual, audio. (e.g., interview transcripts, field notes, photographs).
* Approach: Inductive (developing a theory from data).
* Methods: In-depth interviews, focus groups, ethnography, case studies.
* Analysis: Thematic analysis, content analysis, narrative analysis.

Triangulation:
* Definition: The use of multiple methods, data sources, theories, or investigators to study a single
phenomenon. It enhances the credibility, validity, and reliability of research findings.
* Types:
1. Data Triangulation: Using different data sources (e.g., interviewing teachers, students, and
parents).
2. Methodological Triangulation: Using both quantitative and qualitative methods (e.g., a
survey followed by interviews).
3. Investigator Triangulation: Using multiple researchers to analyze the same data.
4. Theory Triangulation: Using different theoretical perspectives to interpret the data.
* Why it's important: It helps to overcome the bias and inherent limitations of a single method,
providing a more comprehensive and convincing picture of the research problem.
1.3 Research Process in Quantitative Research Method
A systematic, sequential process:
1. Identify a Problem: Define a specific, measurable research problem.
2. Review Literature: Examine existing theories and studies related to the problem.
3. Formulate Hypothesis: Develop a testable prediction about the relationship between variables.
4. Design Research: Plan the overall strategy (experimental, correlational, etc.).
5. Select Sample: Choose participants using probability sampling techniques to ensure
representativeness.
6. Collect Data: Use tools like questionnaires, tests, or scales to gather numerical data.
7. Analyze Data: Use statistical techniques (descriptive and inferential stats) to test the hypothesis.
8. Interpret Results: Explain what the statistical findings mean in the context of the problem and
hypothesis.
9. Report Findings: Write and present the research in a standardized format (Introduction,
Methods, Results, Discussion).

1.4 Research Process in Qualitative Research Method


More flexible, iterative, and cyclical:
1. Identify a Broad Problem Area: Often starts with a general curiosity about a phenomenon.
2. Review Literature: But the literature review may be ongoing throughout the process.
3. State Purpose & Research Questions: Develop broad, open-ended questions (What? How?
Why?).
4. Select Research Design: Choose an approach (e.g., case study, ethnography, phenomenology).
5. Select Sample & Setting: Use purposive or snowball sampling to find information-rich cases.
6. Collect Data: Engage in interviews, observations, etc. Data collection and analysis often happen
simultaneously.
7. Analyze Data: Code the data, identify themes, patterns, and categories. (e.g., thematic analysis).
8. Interpret Data: Construct a rich, narrative description of the findings. Develop a theory
grounded in the data.
9. Report Findings: Write a narrative account, often using direct quotes from participants to
support themes.
1.5 Ethical Issues and Plagiarism in Research
* Key Ethical Principles:
* Informed Consent: Participants must voluntarily agree to participate after understanding the
risks and benefits.
* Confidentiality & Anonymity: Protecting the identity and data of participants.
* Avoiding Harm: Research should cause no physical or psychological harm to participants.
* Honesty & Integrity: Reporting data and methods truthfully without fabrication or
falsification.
* Plagiarism:
* Definition: Presenting someone else's work, words, or ideas as your own without proper
acknowledgment. It is a serious academic offense.
* Types:
* Verbatim (Direct) Plagiarism: Copying text word-for-word without quotation marks and
citation.
* Paraphrasing Plagiarism: Changing a few words but keeping the original structure and
meaning without citation.
* Self-Plagiarism: Reusing significant parts of your own previously published work without
disclosure.
* How to Avoid it: Always take careful notes, use quotation marks for direct quotes, paraphrase
effectively, and cite all sources properly using a consistent citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago).

Unit II: Research Design


2.1 Philosophy of Research (Research Paradigms)
The set of beliefs that guide how research is conducted.
* Positivism: Reality is objective, singular, and can be measured. The researcher is independent.
Associated with Quantitative research.
* Post-Positivism: Reality exists but can only be known imperfectly due to human limitations.
Uses quantitative methods but acknowledges bias.
* Interpretivism/Constructivism: Reality is subjective, multiple, and socially constructed. The
researcher is interactive. Associated with Qualitative research.
* Pragmatism: Focuses on the research problem; uses whichever methods work best to address
it. The philosophy behind Mixed-Methods research.
2.2 Measurement Theory
* Concept: An abstract idea (e.g., "job satisfaction").
* Variable: A measurable form of a concept (e.g., "score on a 1-10 job satisfaction scale").
* Levels of Measurement:
1. Nominal: Categories with no order (e.g., gender, race).
2. Ordinal: Categories with a logical order, but intervals aren't equal (e.g., Likert scales:
Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied).
3. Interval: Ordered categories with equal intervals, but no true zero (e.g., temperature in
Celsius).
4. Ratio: Has all properties of interval plus a true zero (e.g., height, weight, age).

2.3 Major Quantitative Research Designs


* Experimental:
* True Experiment: Random assignment of participants to experimental and control groups.
Manipulates an independent variable (IV) to see its effect on a dependent variable (DV). Highest
internal validity.
* Quasi-Experiment: Lacks random assignment (e.g., using pre-existing groups like two
different classrooms).
* Non-Experimental:
* Descriptive: Describes characteristics of a population or phenomenon (e.g., census, survey).
* Correlational: Examines the relationship between two or more variables without
manipulation. Measures strength and direction (correlation coefficient) but cannot prove causation.
* Ex-Post Facto (Causal-Comparative): Investigates a cause-and-effect relationship where the
cause has already occurred. Compares groups on a potential effect.

2.4 Major Qualitative Research Designs


* Case Study: In-depth exploration of a single case (e.g., a person, group, organization, event) in
its real-world context.
* Ethnography: Studying a culture or social group by immersion in their environment over a long
period (participant observation).
* Phenomenology: Aims to understand the essence of the *lived experiences* of individuals
concerning a common phenomenon (e.g., the experience of grief).
* Grounded Theory: Aims to develop a theory that is "grounded in" systematically gathered and
analyzed data. It's an iterative process of data collection and analysis.
* Narrative Research: Studies the stories people tell about their lives to understand how they
make meaning of their experiences.

2.5 Reliability and Validity


* Reliability: Consistency and stability of a measure. Would you get the same results repeatedly?
* Quantitative Types: Test-retest, inter-rater, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha).
* Qualitative Term: Dependability (is the process logical and trackable?).
* Validity: The accuracy and truthfulness of a measure. Does it measure what it claims to
measure?
* Quantitative Types:
* Internal: Did the IV *really* cause the change in the DV? (Strongest in true experiments).
* External: Can the results be generalized to other people and settings?
* Construct: Does the test measure the theoretical concept it's supposed to?
* Content: Does the test adequately cover the topic?
* Qualitative Terms:
* Credibility (instead of internal validity): Are the findings believable and accurate from the
participants' perspective? (Achieved through triangulation, member checking).
* Transferability (instead of external validity): Can the findings be applied to other contexts?
It's the reader's job to decide.

Unit III: Data Collection and Analysis


3.1 Primary and Secondary sources of Data
* Primary Data: Data collected firsthand by the researcher for the specific purpose of their study.
* Advantages: Original, specific to the research problem, control over quality.
* Disadvantages: Time-consuming, expensive.
* Examples: Survey responses, interview transcripts, experimental results.
* Secondary Data: Data that has already been collected by someone else for a different purpose.
* Advantages: Quick, inexpensive, allows for longitudinal analysis.
* Disadvantages: May not perfectly fit the research needs, questions about accuracy and
credibility.
* Examples: Government census data, company reports, journal articles, historical records.
3.2 Probability and Non-Probability Sampling Techniques
* Probability Sampling: Every member of the population has a known, non-zero chance of being
selected. Allows for generalization.
* Simple Random: Lottery method, random number generator.
* Systematic: Selecting every kth element from a list (e.g., every 10th name).
* Stratified: Dividing the population into subgroups (strata) and then randomly sampling from
each.
* Cluster: Dividing the population into clusters (often geographically), randomly selecting
clusters, and sampling everyone within them.
* Non-Probability Sampling: The probability of selection is unknown. Used for qualitative
research or when a sampling frame is unavailable. Cannot generalize statistically.
* Purposive/Judgmental: Researcher selects participants based on their knowledge of who will
be most informative.
* Snowball: Existing participants recruit future participants from their acquaintances.
* Convenience: Selecting participants who are easiest to access.
* Quota: Ensuring the sample represents certain characteristics in specific proportions.

3.3 Quantitative Techniques and Tools


* Data Collection Tools:
* Structured Questionnaires/Surveys: With closed-ended questions (multiple choice, Likert
scales).
* Structured Observations: Using a checklist to record predefined behaviors.
* Tests and Scales: Standardized instruments (e.g., IQ test, depression scale).
* Data Analysis Techniques:
* Descriptive Statistics: Mean, median, mode, standard deviation, frequency distributions.
* Inferential Statistics:
* t-test: Compares the means of two groups.
* ANOVA: Compares the means of three or more groups.
* Chi-Square: Tests the relationship between categorical variables.
* Correlation: Measures the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables.
* Regression: Predicts the value of a dependent variable based on one or more independent
variables.
3.4 Qualitative Techniques and Tools

* Data Collection Tools:


* Semi-structured/Unstructured Interviews: Guided by open-ended questions.
* Focus Group Discussions: Group interviews to explore collective views.
* Participant Observation: Researcher immerses themselves in the field.
* Document Analysis: Studying texts, photos, videos, and other artifacts.
* Data Analysis Techniques:
* Coding: The process of labeling and organizing qualitative data to identify themes.
* Thematic Analysis: Identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) within data.
* Content Analysis: Systematically coding and categorizing textual information (can be
quantitative or qualitative).
* Narrative Analysis: Analyzing the content and structure of stories people tell.
Unit IV: Scientific Research Writing
4.1. Types of Writings
* Research Proposal: A detailed plan for a study, written to seek approval and funding.
* Thesis/Dissertation: A long formal document submitted for a university degree.
* Research Article/Paper: A concise report of original research published in a scholarly journal
(follows IMRaD format: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion).
* Literature Review: A summary and synthesis of existing research on a specific topic.
* Conference Paper/Poster: A presentation of research findings at an academic conference.
* Abstract/Bibliography: A brief summary of a research article; a list of sources used.

4.2. Exploring Research Issues in Rural Development


* Research in this field is often applied and action-oriented, aiming to solve real-world problems.
* Common Issues/Themes:
* Poverty alleviation and livelihood security.
* Agricultural productivity and sustainability.
* Access to education, healthcare, and sanitation.
* Rural governance and Panchayati Raj institutions.
* Migration and its socio-economic impact.
* Land reforms and natural resource management.
* Impact of government schemes (e.g., MGNREGA).
* Methodological Note: Often requires a Mixed-Methods approach—quantitative data to measure
indicators (e.g., income levels) and qualitative data to understand the social processes and lived
experiences behind those numbers.
4.3. Writing a Proposal
A research proposal is a blueprint. Key sections include:
1. Title: Clear, concise, and descriptive.
2. Introduction & Background: Establishes the context and importance of the problem.
3. Statement of the Problem: Clearly defines the specific issue the research will address.
4. Research Questions & Objectives: Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound
(SMART) goals.
5. Review of Literature: Demonstrates knowledge of existing research and identifies the gap your
study will fill.
6. Research Methodology:
* Research Design (Quantitative/Qualitative/Mixed)
* Population and Sampling Technique
* Data Collection Tools and Procedures
* Data Analysis Plan
7. Significance/Expected Outcomes: Explains the potential contribution of the study.
8. Timeline/Work Plan: A realistic schedule for completing each phase.
9. Budget: Itemized estimate of costs.
10. References/Bibliography: List of all cited sources.
4.4. Organization of the Research writing (Thesis/Report Format)
The standard structure (IMRaD with additions):
1. Preliminary Pages: Title page, Declaration, Certificate, Acknowledgments, Table of Contents,
List of Tables/Figures, Abstract.
2. Chapter 1: Introduction: Background, Problem Statement, Objectives, Research Questions,
Significance, Limitations, Definition of Key Terms.
3. Chapter 2: Review of Literature: Critical synthesis of existing work, leading to the identification
of the research gap.
4. Chapter 3: Research Methodology: Detailed account of the research design, sample, tools, data
collection, and analysis procedures. (The "recipe" of your study).
5. Chapter 4: Data Analysis and Interpretation: Presentation of findings (using tables, graphs,
quotes) and their interpretation. Answers the "what" of the research.
6. Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusion: Summarizes key findings, discusses their implications
in light of the literature, states the conclusion, and recommends future areas of research. Answers
the "so what" of the research.
7. End Pages: References/Bibliography, Appendices (e.g., survey tool, consent form), Plagiarism
Report.

You might also like