0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views22 pages

Precolonial State Power in Africa

about statemaking in Africa

Uploaded by

sgong657
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views22 pages

Precolonial State Power in Africa

about statemaking in Africa

Uploaded by

sgong657
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

PRECOLONIAL

STATE-MAKING
NICHOLAS RUSH SMITH
MANSA MUSA
(?? – 1332/37)
TWO
PUZZLES
• A First Puzzle:
• Africa had relatively few
bureaucratized states prior to
colonization when compared to
Europe
PRE-
COLONIAL • State power therefore tended to be
more uneven than in Europe
STATE • Fewer central institutions and
POWER bureaucracies

• How do we explain the relative


abundance of centralized states in
Europe versus the relative lack of
centralized states in Africa?
EUROPE AND AFRICA AROUND 1200
• A second puzzle
• States that did develop were often
“tributary” states as opposed to the
territorial states of Europe
• Tributary state: A central ruler
PRE- would demand payment from
COLONIAL secondary leaders following
conquest even as they retain their
STATE formal independence

POWER
• How do we explain the differences
between the emergence of predominantly
territorial states in Europe and
predominantly tributary states in Africa?
TABLE OF • Explaining Differences in European and
CONTENTS African State-Making
• Imagining Multiple Types of Sovereignty
• Empires of Trade and Knowledge
EXPLAINING
DIFFERENCES
IN EUROPEAN
AND AFRICAN
STATE-
MAKING
• Geography, Population, and Political Choices
• Africa’s geography has created difficulties for state builders
since pre-colonial times.

• Despite being a large and resource rich land mass, Africa

SOURCES
has historically had low population densities.

OF • This makes it costly to extend infrastructure and tax


populations

UNEVEN • Attempts to enclose or tax a population within a state


STATE have often pushed those being enclosed to move
elsewhere.

POWER (1) • Exceptions that Prove the Rule


• Formal states develop primarily in floodplains of rivers or
the fertile highlands where ecology supports larger
populations or as coastal trading ports
• Esp. Niger River Valley, Nile River Valley, Ethiopia, Rift
Valley, Swahili Coast Empires
GEOGRAPHIC
COMPARISON
OF SIZE
CITIES OF 1000 PEOPLE
(CONTEMPORARY)
• Movement as a Barrier to State Building
• Pre-colonial states had difficulties expanding
because populations would simply move if
threatened with being conquered.
SOURCES • Movement was made easier by a general
reliance on rain-fed agriculture and
OF relative lack of irrigated farming.

UNEVEN
STATE • Movement Shaping Political Choices
• This tendency towards movement pushed
POWER (2) rulers to concentrate on conquering
populations rather than territory – a different
pattern than in Europe.

• .
• Warfare to Conquer People, Not Territory
• Warfare was typically directed to
conquering people, rather than taking over
territory

SOURCES • Consequences of a Political Calculus


• Conquest tended to produce tribute
OF STATE payments rather than building durable
WEAKNESS institutions

(3) • Revenue Limits States


• This dynamic disincentivized leaders from
building enduring institutions, which were
quite costly, designed to rule large
territories
IMAGINING
MULTIPLE
TYPES OF
SOVEREIGNTY
• African vs European Political Imaginations

• Sovereignty was conceived as unitary in Europe


versus multiple or shared in many parts of Africa
• Because the different costs associated with state
building in Europe and Africa, leaders on the two
IMAGINING continents imagined what it meant to rule in different

SOVEREIGNTY ways

• European rulers imagined controlling their territory


fully and absolutely to the best of their abilities

• African leaders, by contrast, imagined different centers


of power, rather than homogenous control
• Land could theoretically belong to one
person and the people on the land to
another
• Could result in a situation of multiple or
MULTIPLE split sovereignty
SOVEREIGNS • Different from the unitary model of
sovereignty of European rulers

• Conceivable in some areas that as


people moved, their ruler’s sovereignty
moved with them
PICTURING
SOVEREIGNTY:
SULTAN NJOYA’S
IMAGE OF HIS
KINGDOM
EMPIRES OF TRADE
AND
KNOWLEDGE
• Connected Africa
• Different state forms from Europe does not mean
isolation

• Long pattern of religious connection


• Christianity moved into Nubia (Ethiopia/Sudan)
in 300-400AD
• Islam moved across the Sahara into West Africa
RELIGIOUS AND in 700-800AD
TRADE
CONNECTIONS • Long pattern of trading connection
• West African trade w/Islamic caliphates starting
around 700AD
• East African coastal trade w/ Islamic traders
from as early as 100AD but picking up after
1000AD
• Trade primarily for gold, ivory, salt and slaves
• Rulers connected to outside world often acted
as brokers for these goods
PRECOLONIAL TRADE
ROUTES
• Reputedly the richest man who ever
MANSA
lived
MUSA, • Went on pilgrimage to Mecca
RULER OF • Supposedly gave away so much gold en
MALI route, it depressed gold prices in Cairo

EMPIRE • Fortune built by controlling trans-Saharan


gold and salt trade

You might also like