Understanding Prison Group Dynamics
Understanding Prison Group Dynamics
'saIlI^FleIloJ rIuI .(Iasolf, uLIoJ [Link] 'IgI 'd 'gll 'Iol.'NuaDS IDDIS puD 1oct1t1o4 lo
Ssottl 1?q1 Jarlaq eql passardxa peuollsanb ,(truerlrl (,ruapmy aq1 to slouuy ruoltzllirqz{{aU ur ro:}rug u
ettros Jo aalr.,!!l lnoqe lnq papr^rp 3ra^r suolqdo se srauosrrd Jo apntrly aql 'plel.{ 'g trrua11 n
'sanbll) uoqrd uI sepl?,(ol Jo rll8uarts eqt ol ef,uarr '0gT'd'tZ6I'erqd1apepq4,.o3 llorurddrl
-rar uI uoluldo rlsql slupuo uosFd snolrs^ pa{sE 'g 'f '{"1o1out?rr4 s,prrelraqtns 'H 'X uI pajonb
stq ratrrr eql s'r?ed earql Jo polrad B 8upnq" '0e6I 'uotsog '49 oN tagea.I uollzrrossy uosrrd
sllasnqlessetr^[ 'uor]ernpg uostr4 'sut33r11 y '1
gsdnor8 aql ere a3re1 rvro11 (7) lsdno"r8 leru "
'66I puu '09I '89I 'AII 'dd 'Zt6I 'Iro,\
-Jolur Jo sJequreur eJe sJauosrJd Jo uorlrod ,\rcN '')uI 'qllurs 'U pruqrl1 pue 3uo1 ,(u1 '3115
-ord rer{r\^. (1) :apnpur tq8nos ere sret\sue Eulg ut stoal puDsnoqa fiuama 'sa,,lrzT 'f, [Link]-I 6
'gg 'd pue 94 'd '1,ro1 ,\raN '996I r'o3 uEIIrur
qrq/lr o1 suortrsanb cgrceds aql 'elll dnor8 -rutr{ aql 'puoKag put) suosttd 'selefl ptoJues r
IerrlJolw ]o ?uelxa puE arnlEu arp urEel o1
uaeq srq a^I?3e[qo eqJ 'eperu sear .raldzqr 'nq?no aql r?'?uI 'uo1su.t21
sFIt uI papnlf,ur Lpnrs eqr leql uorssard rp LLDqauNA 'iloH lo uotsslutat[ (,q pagulldag 'g71
-ur1 puerdsapr.^ Jagtur slqt lsat ot sI tJ -€II '4d '(enssleg) g{61 ''lul'tuoflutog ,tp [Link]
:qroi anaN '{ylunututo1 uosrrd aql :f,DtIOOS<
e'peluls se uorldurnssu
[Link] aqt rllJ/rt aar8e o] paurlf,ur arela (11ensn uosrJd ur sJotrsr1 ,'(roraeqaq
1o)
pauorlsanb era^4. sE qrns Jo JIuq reao 'sdno-r8 ,,d1r-rep8ar e qf,ns surelsns &p.(o1 dnor8
IeruJolul ;o uorler8atrq pue q13ua4s aql ]o asues leluetuela uE pu€ ssausnoue8ar8
o1 af,ua;alal ur uorurdo rraq? ul elrugap os ' ',, 'sprof,ar 'sdnoJ8 uosud 1o Surluads
lou er" aruauadxa .srua,( (ueur Jo sIErlHo q '[Link] 'g Lrua11 '.{[Link] n'drqsuor}u1ar
uosr-rd aruos epqlA 'uorlrsod lueraresqns (ue ur ' ' ' s8ulaq ueurnq yo sdno;s alup
€ ur IIe aru Laqt teq] tluJ aqt pue 'ureql -Ilosuo) pue elEullue qJlqrtt suollolua eug
uodn sr tuqt uortuzneru8rls luntntu aql asoqr .(q ft111qe1o1,ru1 pue dlrrnd uJ pelle)
'euo8rapun seq u"ur eqt saf,uarradxa ay1 -xe tou ftpLo1 dno.r8 e qlr^r Jaqlouu euo
eqt ot enp alqrsnuld uaas plnom ',(trunur ot Sullc uaru eseql ' ' ',, 'sJeuosr-rd Jo 3ur
-rrrof, ear1 e
ur sdnor8 (reurud }o suorleler -1eeds q 'suodal sur33r11 z'salzurur Suourz
aql 01 relrurs ssel Jo eJorrr pue elErurlul ,(1p,(o1 o1 suoIsnIIE euros sa{eru [Link]
eJE sJauosrJd Suouru sdrqsuollelsJ I€rf,os ueprelA r'Jeqto rpua 01 pl.o1 dlpnsn a-re
ruqr uopdurnssz eql 'slsrxe uorlre pu€ s,[Link] tuqt uoltrElrpur saar8 sateg pJoJ
lq8noqr 1o (1run e leqt ef,uapraa rpnur sr -ues 'suorlzrrlqnd uIBlJetr pue 'saraour eql
araq] 'sedrcse ro slorr se qf,ns d;elrualpad 'srededsl'{au eq1 (q pezrseqdura uaaq (puanb
u ur Sursr-ru suorlentrrs lf,ruuof, uI 'uoll -ar} ser{ ap1 Lru4ualpad Jo lcadsz srqa
-EsJeauof,. s,Jerllo qree uodn lualul uaur Jo 'uorSe^Jesqo uoururof, L1xe1 e sT tslxa f,rFup
sralsnll e^Jasqo ,(aqf uaqrrr peterl$e dlasop -rlos pu€ 'aIEJoru 'trueurrluas qlFllvt. ur sdnor8
eJe seleruur aqr ]Eql uorssardurr eql uru8 OSIYUCtI NI AAHCIH I nIO.{I'SUANOSIU'I JYHI
'JAil.
-LrrEur ol lua
Uf,RII ITTS (rIYNO(I -{rBIq Jo tur
-arap lsed s
'9t s,pren8 aql
SdNOUC SJVIAINI TVINTIOdNI -qlllus,, e p
u ,(q pa>1oaq
srq pug Letu
srq pa.4tolle
puolas aql
sl?rrrs arll Jo
oq.\\ seluurur
ecel o1 lred
424 THE PRISON COMMUNITY were clearlY
Exploratory inquiries ,t"":i]-:d^:"^:'1-t: in the follou
(3) What personality types have -::t"t*
general traits of ,informal grouP organrza-
them and what ryp€s frurrl ,rotl (4) What is gave indicati
the nature of informal oorn life in prison,
Iion. E*[Link] inmates and officials with major questi
r,v^ere consulted before a formulation
how ..primary,, are ,frE-grJrpr, und whut insight being affiliatt
of a group concePt was made' From the After a
variations exist? ft
inforriation obtained in this manner it
The data for this effort have been col- planation ol
lectedbythreemethods:Schedule'ques'waspossibletoconsftuctempiricallyacon- the intervieu
cept of a "prison primary group"' Thus'
tionnaire, and individual case study' First' u gtot'p-h'" been conceived as a 'col-
that gangs, r
190 men were interviewed with a schedule "'ih isted in the
lectivity of prisoners who possess a common their charact
inciuding six batteries of questions' Yith body oi knowledge and interest sufficient to
the exception of length of residence these p'odt"" an understaading and solidarity he happenet
men were selected at random. of the men gation. The
*rtitr' is characterized by a we-feeling' senti-
interviewed 99 had served between rr u*i mental and unanimity' and
explainecl tc
15 months and 91 had been iiti'tarcerttei ,attachment' time' elements of
he gave evicl,
which a-ll-ows' at the same
between 3 atd' Ayears, with u" uo"'ur" oi rtras tecorcler
.
replies are evaluated by only one observer' most casual nature. He is the man who is al- by elimina
In order to test the reliability of this most playing a "lone-hand." questionna
method and to collect other data as well, D. The "Complete-Solitary" Man: This is that categ(
a totally different group of men were given the man who keeps almost constantly to him- plete-solita
a questionnaire under anonymous circum- self and shares nothing with other inmates. total 37 p
While he may talk with other men, he is gen- corrected I
stances four months after the schedules de-
erally alone and seeks no one. responses)
scribed in the foregoing pages had been
agrbement
completed. The men were seen in groups These four categories of possible roles
of about 50 and the same explanations were were carefully explained to the subjects so grouped n
given them collectively as were given to the that the meaning of "A" agreed as closely method. (
inmates who replied to the schedule form. as possible with the concePt of primary schedule z
The degree of social affiliation was extended group affiliation for the schedule subjects, baffiing, fo,
in the questionnaire method, but the con- and "B" agreed with the semi'Primary con- not ordinz
precise resr
cept of primary group was kept the same. ception. Roles "C" and "D" were made to
The brief descriptions of four possible types correspond with the ungrouped category in the exactn
of affiliation used on the questionnaire the schedule subjects, although the ques- as they in,
follows:
fi{th of tl
tionnaire was intended to refine the degree
groups, tw
A. The Complete "Clique Man'": This is the of "ungroupedness." Questions from the and that
man who is one of a group of three or more floor, illustrations by the writer, reading grouped.")
men who are all very close friends. They share and rereading of the statements preceded the same t
each others' luxuries and secrets and have ac- the request that each inmate designate the
questionna
cepted, or are willing to accept, punishment type of situation that most closely fit his
the schedul
one for the other. The "clique man" is so position in prison. The results are shown
closely associated with this group that he thinks in Table 2.
residence s
average. Increasing length of residence not themselves tend to become smaller as shown
only tends to reduce the number of primary in the data here presented on the size of
groups (Tables I and 2), but the groups primary groups.
36.
INEFFEC
as thera
in term
inferior
the crin
The so
interpe
have rc
vestigat
interac'
a seric
omissic
>SOUR
America
t o.27--2!,
Sociolog
1 FIatr
Horizon
1951, es
e Ken'
City, N
" J. /
York: I
a Mos
social s
Conttttt
1940; l
Commr
Associa
and E
Americ
577-58:
Social
47 (Mt
6
For
I\{oren
Ncrvot