Energy Modeling for Building Archetypes
Energy Modeling for Building Archetypes
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................C.i
1.0 Large Institutional Archetype Summary ...............................................................................................C.1
2.0 Low-Mid Rise MURB Archetype Summary ...........................................................................................C.6
3.0 High Rise MURB Archetype Summary ................................................................................................C.10
4.0 Secondary School Archetype Summary .............................................................................................C.17
5.0 Rec Centre Archetype Summary .........................................................................................................C.22
6.0 Commercial Office Archetype Summary.............................................................................................C.27
7.0 Hotel Archetype Summary ...................................................................................................................C.35
8.0 Non-Food Retail Archetype Summary.................................................................................................C.40
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
INTRODUCTION
C.i
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
Introduction
The energy analysis undertaken for this study is focused on generally quantifying the impact of the opaque
envelope on whole building energy use for different major building types (archetypes). The energy results
shown below are for illustrative purposes to give an approximate idea of the scale of the energy impact
resulting from the opaque building envelope. The results should not replace project specific energy models for
design decision making, but may be used as guidance to inform early design.
Archetypes
The archetypes are rectangular buildings with size, number of stories and aspect ratios approximated based
on experience with similar projects. Although buildings come in many different sizes, shapes and orientations,
any geometry selected would be arbitrary; thus standard rectangular shapes were chosen.
Each archetype also uses mechanical and lighting systems that reflect standard practice for a large portion of
the BC market. Mechanical and electrical systems can vary significantly between similar projects, however,
one representative system was chosen for illustrative purposes. Higher performing mechanical systems may
show less impact from the building envelope, while higher performing lighting systems may show more impact
due to reduction in heat gain. However, the general trend and slope of the curves shown below are expected
to be consistent for most buildings, though the absolute values may vary significantly depending on design.
The energy model input details for each archetype are summarized below, with each input followed by graphs
of electricity and gas energy use over varying R-values.
Energy Graphs
The graphs below represent both annual electricity and gas energy usage over a wide range of R-values for
each archetype, at two different glazing ratios, and for 3 different BC climates. The graphs were developed to
quantify the difference in electricity and gas energy related to differences in the opaque envelope related to the
impact of thermal bridging through interface details. Specific scenarios and results are discussed in detail in
Part 2.
[Link]
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
THERMAL MASS
Most energy models deal with thermal mass through the use of conduction transfer functions. These functions
are determined based on the materials of the assembly modeled, and tell the model how to distribute, over
time, the heat losses and gains through the walls and roofs that are calculated at each time step. The
calculation is independent of the U-value but impacts energy use through the distribution of heat losses and
heat gains over time, dependent on the material properties modeled. Figures C0.1 and C0.2 respectively show
the response factor and cumulative heat flow for low and high mass walls for a concrete high rise MURB with
electric baseboard heating.
0.02
Low Mass
0.015
High Mass Interior Insulation
0.01 High Mass Exterior Insulation
0.005
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50
Hours
0.4
Heat Flow (W/m2K)
0.35
0.3
0.25
Low Mass
0.2
0.15 High Mass Interior Insulation
0.1 High Mass Exterior Insulation
0.05
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50
Hours
Figures C0.3 through C0.8 below show the difference in energy use between high (concrete walls) and low
(steel stud walls) thermal mass systems. At the lowest R-value, R2.5, there is as much as 3-5% heating energy
savings for mass walls over steel stud walls for the high rise MURB archetype, depending on climate zone.
However, over the range of R-values, the average difference in heating energy is 1% or less. The figures also
show that a slightly lower R-value in mass walls, about R0.5 to R1.5 lower, yields the same energy use as
lightweight walls. However, ASHRAE 90.1-2010 prescribes mass walls at R-values lower than steel stud walls
by about R3, R1.5, and R10 for BC climate zones 5, 6, and 7, respectively. As such, the reduction in R-value
for mass walls in ASHRAE 90.1 may not be fully warranted for BC climate zones. However, this point is
somewhat moot since the change in absolute energy use at the higher prescribed code R-values is not
significant.
[Link]
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
100
40% WWR, Concrete Mass
90
80
70
60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C0.3: Prince George – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
160
156
154
152
150
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C0.4: Prince George – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
[Link]
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70
60
50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C0.5: Summerland – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
136
132
130
128
126
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C0.6: Summerland – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.v
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70
60
50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C0.7: Vancouver – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
132
128
126
124
122
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C0.8: Vancouver – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
[Link]
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.1
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.2
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
50% WWR
Electricty Use (ekWh/m2)
173
30% WWR
168
163
158
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C1.1: Prince George – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
400
50% WWR
380
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
30% WWR
360
340
320
300
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C1.2: Prince George – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.3
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
50% WWR
Electricty Use (ekWh/m2)
187
30% WWR
182
177
172
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C1.3: Summerland – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
320
50% WWR
300
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
30% WWR
280
260
240
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C1.4: Summerland – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.4
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
50% WWR
Electricty Use (ekWh/m2)
182
30% WWR
177
172
167
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C1.5: Vancouver – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
300
50% WWR
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
260
240
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C1.6: Vancouver – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.5
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.6
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
50% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
80
60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C2.1: Prince George – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
160
50% WWR
158
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
30% WWR
156
154
152
150
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C2.2: Prince George – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.7
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
50% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
80
30% WWR
70
60
50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C2.3: Summerland – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
136
50% WWR
134
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
30% WWR
132
130
128
126
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C2.4: Summerland – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.8
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
50% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
80
30% WWR
70
60
50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C2.5: Vancouver – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
131
50% WWR
129
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
30% WWR
127
125
123
121
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C2.6: Vancouver – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.9
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.10
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
100
40% WWR
90
80
70
60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C3.1: Prince George – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
160
70% WWR
158
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
40% WWR
156
154
152
150
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C3.2: Prince George – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.11
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
80
40% WWR
70
60
50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C3.3: Summerland – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
136
70% WWR
134
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
40% WWR
132
130
128
126
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C3.4: Summerland – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.12
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
80
40% WWR
70
60
50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C3.5: Vancouver – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
131
70% WWR
129
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
40% WWR
127
125
123
121
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C3.6: Vancouver – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.13
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
90
40% WWR
80
70
60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C3.7: Prince George – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
160
70% WWR
158
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
40% WWR
156
154
152
150
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C3.8: Prince George – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.14
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
75 40% WWR
65
55
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C3.9: Summerland – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
136
70% WWR
134
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
40% WWR
132
130
128
126
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C3.10: Summerland – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.15
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
70 40% WWR
60
50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C3.11: Vancouver – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
131
70% WWR
129
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
40% WWR
127
125
123
121
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C3.12: Vancouver – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.16
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.17
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.18
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
40% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
78
20% WWR
76
74
72
70
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C4.1: Prince George – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
170
40% WWR
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
130
110
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C4.2: Prince George – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.19
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
40% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
78
20% WWR
76
74
72
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C4.3: Summerland – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
120
40% WWR
110
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
20% WWR
100
90
80
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C4.4: Summerland – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.20
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
40% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
72 20% WWR
70
68
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C4.5: Vancouver – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
110
40% WWR
100
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
20% WWR
90
80
70
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C4.6: Vancouver – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.21
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.22
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.23
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
60% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
142
30% WWR
140
138
136
134
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C5.1: Prince George – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
290
60% WWR
280
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
30% WWR
270
260
250
240
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C5.2: Prince George – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.24
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
60% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
143
30% WWR
141
139
137
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C5.3: Summerland – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
250
60% WWR
240
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
30% WWR
230
220
210
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C5.4: Summerland – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.25
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
60% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
139
30% WWR
138
137
136
135
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C5.5: Vancouver – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
250
60% WWR
240
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
30% WWR
230
220
210
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C5.6: Vancouver – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.26
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.27
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.28
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
130
40% WWR
125
120
115
110
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C6.1: Prince George – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
115
95 40% WWR
85
75
65
55
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C6.2: Prince George – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.29
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
130
125
120
115
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C6.3: Summerland – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
80
70% WWR
70
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
40% WWR
60
50
40
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C6.4: Summerland – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.30
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
125
40% WWR
120
115
110
105
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C6.5: Vancouver – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
70
70% WWR
60
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
40% WWR
50
40
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C6.6: Vancouver – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.31
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
130
40% WWR
125
120
115
110
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C6.7: Prince George – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
110
90 40% WWR
80
70
60
50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C6.8: Prince George – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.32
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
130
125
120
115
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C6.9: Summerland – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
70
70% WWR
60
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
40% WWR
50
40
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C6.10: Summerland – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.33
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
125
40% WWR
120
115
110
105
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C6.11: Vancouver – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
60
70% WWR
50
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
40% WWR
40
30
20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C6.12: Vancouver – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.34
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.35
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.36
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
90 40% WWR
80
70
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C7.1: Prince George – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
250
220
210
200
190
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C7.2: Prince George – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.37
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
100
40% WWR
90
80
70
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C7.3: Summerland – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
200
70% WWR
190
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
40% WWR
180
170
160
150
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C7.4: Summerland – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.38
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
70% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
100
40% WWR
90
80
70
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C7.5: Vancouver – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
190
70% WWR
180
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
40% WWR
170
160
150
140
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C7.6: Vancouver – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.39
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
C.40
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
60% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
96
30% WWR
94
92
90
88
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C8.1: Prince George – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
260
200
180
160
140
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C8.2: Prince George – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.41
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
60% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
102
30% WWR
100
98
96
94
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C8.3: Summerland – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
190
60% WWR
170
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
30% WWR
150
130
110
90
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C8.4: Summerland – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.42
Appendix C - Energy Thermal
Building Envelope ModelingBridging
Analysis and Results
Guide BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL BRIDGING GUIDE
60% WWR
Elelctricity Use (ekWh/m2)
93
30% WWR
91
89
87
85
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C8.5: Vancouver – Electricity Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
170
60% WWR
150
Gas Use (ekWh/m2)
30% WWR
130
110
90
70
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Opaque Wall Assembly R-value (ft2-F-hr/Btu)
Figure C8.6: Vancouver – Gas Use vs. Opaque Wall Assembly R-Value
C.43