The System to Win at Roulette

Codename "Winning Roulette"

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 1

SYSTEM 'WINNING ROULETTE': CONSIDERATIONS

1) INTRODUCTION
From my first visit to the Casinos, I immediately approached the Roulette table with a mathematical spirit.
the statistician. Perhaps all of this is due to the fact that the passion for astronomy and studies related to it
Scientific material has always led me to think that 'chance' is not as random as it seems.
but it would be governed by precise laws that describe its events....

After reading some books that described various methodologies to be applied to Casino games and after
I realized that each of these had its strengths, but also had some shortcomings.
unmanageable when particularly negative phases of the game presented themselves, I began to make
experiments and matured the desire to develop a system that possessed the following characteristics:

It should be as simple as possible to play.

2) Allow them to remain in the minimum-maximum relationship of the playing table (therefore real game, not just on
a nice piece of paper!)
3) Of a useful constant and discrete nature
4) Did not require exhausting waits for boules before being put into play
5) That -in the most extreme cases- it could be taken up and put into play even in the following days
that did not require an exaggerated capital
7) That it managed to contain even the 'nibbling' of the outputs of '0'
8) It should be playable on simple chances
... and the common desire of all of us scholars, that it would truly be unbeatable!!!!!

As for point number 9, I don't have a certain answer yet, but to date, after many years, and with a
series of improvements, I can claim that my system could be destined to win forever!

In fact and in reality, he has never lost!!

Who knows… the arduous judgment is for posterity!!

The system called 'WINNING ROULETTE' is based on the best ideas formulated by the D' mount.
Alembert, from the study of Della Moglie's figures, from the recovery of Garcia and from all the remaining ideas
formulated by the undersigned.

For the sake of justice, I should also mention the name of Marigny for his studies on personal permanence, because in
The 'WINNING ROULETTE' system is somehow subject to these laws both in the phases.
negative what in those positive!

NOTE 1: the "WINNING ROULETTE" system is not based solely on gaming techniques.
from the aforementioned scholars, but from them, he inherited only a few winning ideas!

NOTE 2: if you are not an expert in Casino games and the terminology used in this
environment before starting read the glossary on page 14.

NOTE 3: this manual does not intend to promote gambling but presents some
logical-mathematical deductions that can be applied to some Casino games. The author
disclaims all responsibility for the use of the information contained in this manual.

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 2

2) VARIOUS CONSIDERATIONS
In the last twenty years, not entirely consistently, I have repeatedly tried my hand at experimenting.
every system was proposed to me, by friends, in magazines and so on. Only since 1998 with the advent of the Internet
I found new sources of supply regarding the applied mathematical systems in gaming.
gambling. To be honest, I didn't play any of these systems at the casino because after brief analyses on
I immediately realized that they were not feasible, that is, they were losing in practice, and the mathematics
it was devouring it in a few sessions!

So, discouraged, I returned to the draft of my system that seemed good to me and I worked on it in order to
bring further improvements!
Try and retry, modify here and modify there, the system seemed to be increasingly less vulnerable to the enemy.
(that is to say, the Roulette)!

IMPORTANT NOTE: I have never studied other games like 'Punto e Banco' or the
"30/40" anyone who wants can give it a try!

INTERNET OR CASINO?
As I announced a little while ago, the world of the Internet has opened new doors for me, but ignorance, alas, comes at a price!
A couple of years ago, I tried to game the system in some 'fake' online casinos, and I ended up losing everything.
Only by analyzing the post hoc stays did I realize that they deviated from the laws of chance in a way
abnormal. I then promised myself not to play in these online casinos anymore!

Recently, after extensive research and after selecting one of the best and honest Internet casinos,
I tried the tough challenge again! This time everything went right: I find myself winning consistently.
and almost, I could say that the Internet Casino seems to be even more 'stable' - at the level of
stays - in relation to real stays!

I can say with certainty that it is much better to play 'WINNING ROULETTE' online.
Casino that is not in a real Casino for the simple fact that there are some recovery phases.
waiting can reach 200 balls.

4) RANDOM PHENOMENA
I preface that I have tested the system using every possible phenomenon and random permanence as to
Example: Home roulette, decks of playing cards, coins, lottery draws and similar, actual stays
of Casinos, real Casinos, computer random number generators, etc.

In all cases, there have been no particular problems and in only one case, using a random generator of
numbers in Excel, I found myself having to face a particularly negative phase that has
subsequently restored after about 280 bowls!

This is just a borderline case that can still occur.

With these various extraction methodologies, I have experimented with a total of about 40,000 extractions!

5) WHAT IS MEANT BY 'SYSTEM LOSS?'

The 'Winning Roulette' system is primarily based on the principle of the D'Alembert progression (see glossary)
At the end of this ebook). When I win, I decrease the stake by one unit, when I lose I increase the stake.
of a unit.
As I said a little while ago, at point 2 ('It allowed to remain within the minimal-maximal relationship of the table')
game (so real game, not just on a nice piece of paper!), knowing that the maximum and minimum in
simple odds are included in a ratio of 1 / 50 (minimum 10.00 € / maximum 500.00 €) I mean the
"defeat", as the overcoming of the aforementioned maximum, since theoretically I would no longer be able to
bet 51 units on a chance on the next round.

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 3

In practice, this limit has been raised to a maximum of 31 units bet, precisely on the occasion of
of the match 'on paper' using a random number generator in Excel.
THIS HAS BEEN THE MAXIMUM LIMIT I HAVE ENCOUNTERED IN ALL THE EXPERIMENTS

I would also like to point out that the system provides for a total budget of 250 units in order to be
played with a good margin of safety, since (for example, in case of consecutive defeats,
I would find myself at hit number 22 having lost 253 units (1+2+3+4 etc etc).
ALTHOUGH I HAVE REACHED THE THRESHOLD OF THIS LIMIT, I CAN CALMLY
ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE NEVER EXCEEDED SUCH A LIMIT OF 250 UNITS, OR RATHER,
I only needed 250 units, because during the gameplay session, several
I had already won dozens of units and this automatically allowed me to
INCREASE MY BUDGET BY 250 UNITS WITH MONEY FROM THE CASINO!!!

From a theoretical point of view, (I would not advise taking such risks) the theoretical loss of the system occurs
only when 1275 units are lost, equivalent to the sum 1+2+3+4 etc up to 50.

From a practical standpoint, as I mentioned before, I believe that playing with an initial budget of 250 units is
already sufficient to ensure (to win!) up to 3-10 times the initial budget (of 250 units).

When we find ourselves losing these 250 units, in my opinion, it would be appropriate to start over!

6) MAGICI OR MATHEMATICI?
A system based on the mathematics of bets is worth more than one based on prediction.
of the events.

This is another of the considerations I have developed over many years of study!

Predicting the outcome of a combination almost "in one shot" or "within a few shots" is something possible but it
call it 'luck'!!! In fact, the likelihood of a specific event occurring is governed by precise laws that
they only determine the possible time frame (expressed in number of draws).

The numbers (or groups of numbers) that can be examined often have bizarre behaviors and
unpredictable (and sooner or later there is a risk that they will make us pay for it!) but they still respect certain
laws, some of these, related to their probability of occurrence.

These observations serve to affirm that if we do not equip ourselves from the very beginning with a good 'progression'
we would soon find ourselves, yes, witnessing the emergence of the event we predicted, but also
to have lost more money than we could have won in that/those hit(s)!!!

A system with an ace up its sleeve!

The 'WINNING ROULETTE' system proposed on these pages uses a parameter
"safety/performance" that WILLINGLY does not fully utilize its power, in order to
preserve their safety!

Let's say it's possible to adjust the security parameter with small adjustments at the expense of
parameter yield and vice versa. My goal for years was to make the system
Vincent, always and continuously, offering a good margin of safety (all the
systems would lose sooner or later and I would get angry!)

I have optimized it over time and through my experiments to the point that, until I
I will lose it, I will not use some small tips that I have already developed to make it even more
solid! The precautions I am talking about are trivial and in the actual application of the game they
I will propose to the reader so that they can benefit from it and risk the least possible on their own skin (and from the
your bag!)!

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 4

Essentially, the system provides a game in maximum security, but in order to push it to the limit
I have never wanted (and I have not needed it for the moment) to play it with the maximum.
possible security. Just think that the Internet Casino I am playing in does not pay anything to the
exit of zero in the sense that only half of the chips bet on the chances are retained and
neither 'freezes' nor 'unfreezes' any chips in case of subsequent winnings!

In a more 'honest' casino, I could win higher amounts, or with fewer anxieties during phases.
negative, (I have gone through phases where I have reached a maximum of 24 units)
attending the exit of 7 zeros) and this is just one of the game strategies that can be used
improve!

Simplicity pays off

Sometimes I have tried to develop very complex systems, while at other times I have tried to play systems.
equally complex, but to be honest, (especially in a real Casino) after a few hours, one risks
losing the necessary clarity and making mistakes, therefore over time I have tried to follow,
and in turn develop simple systems that did not require complicated mathematical operations!

"WINNING ROULETTE" is this too!

THE SIMPLICITY THAT PAYS!

9) CONCLUSIONS
I won't dwell any further on philosophical considerations, I wouldn't want to bore the reader even before having
started playing 'WINNING ROULETTE'!

As announced, all the work I have done in the last 14 years is to be considered in the public domain.
I feel that anyone will be able to try to game the system as I proposed in an absolutely
integral (I haven't kept anything hidden!).

A curiosity: the sum of the numbers of the Roulette from 1 to 36 results in 666!
Hell machine?

Who knows!!!

Happy reading!

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 5

 WINNING ROULETTE: The Logical-Mathematical-Statistical Foundations

Let's get into the core of the system by analyzing the logic of the 9 fundamental points on which the system is based and
Let's analyze them together, trying to provide a rational explanation for each point!

HERE ARE THE NINE 'STRONG POINTS' OF THE 'WINNING ROULETTE' SYSTEM:

Simplicity of the game

2) It allows to remain within the minimal-maximal relationship of the game table (therefore real game, not just on a
a nice piece of paper!)
3) Provides a useful constant and discreet
It does not require exhausting waits for boules before being played.
In the most extreme cases, it can be brought back and put into play even on the following days.
It does not require an exaggerated capital.
It can also contain the 'nibbling' of the '0' exits.
Playable on simple chances
... and the common desire of all of us scholars... perhaps it is truly unbeatable!!!!!

Analysis point No. 1:

In fact, all you need is a piece of paper, a pen, and knowledge of basic mathematics. In the system
"WINNING ROULETTE" only uses addition and subtraction to perform calculations!
If you play at the real Casino, make sure to have a jacket with some pockets, it will be more comfortable for you.
use the tokens to keep track of the counts!

Analysis point No. 2:

Many systems I have analyzed suffer from an irreparable gap related to the minimums and maximums.
present at every gaming table. 'WINNING ROULETTE' defends itself quite well from this point of view.
since it is played on even chances and is based on the "D'Alembert" system which involves the increase
of the post of a single unit for each shot lost and the decrease of one unit for each shot won. Ne
you must
to find oneself facing a 50-point discrepancy between one chance and the opposing one! With the appropriate
changes made by me to the D'Alembert pole, we will see how this case is statistically very,
very unlikely to happen!

Analysis point No. 3:

I do not have very precise reports on the average profit generated by the 'WINNING ROULETTE' system either.
because these average profits should be analyzed in relation to a high amount of stays!

From personal experience, I can say that making a profit of 10-100 units generally requires a
a session that ranges from 30 to 300 boules. On average, I encounter one of these sessions every 10 sessions.
particularly unfavorable that introduces me into a long recovery phase that can even stretch beyond the
200 balls thus significantly lowering the aforementioned average by 1/3. However, this circumstance is nonetheless
very infrequent.

For reasons related to game accuracy, I have never paused to analyze the
average yield of the system. In my gaming sessions, I set a profit goal (e.g. 10, 20, 30
unit) and once that profit is reached, I cash in and suspend the game!

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 6

Analysis point No. 4:
There is no waiting for the game: with the first move, if I want, I can randomly bet on a chance of mine.
choice! The game continues uninterrupted.

Analysis point No. 5:

Personally, it has happened to me that I couldn't complete a session for one reason or another; then I am
was forced to continue the match at another time.

The "WINNING ROULETTE" system relies on the much-discussed "*personal permanence". To keep it short, if
let's analyze some series of consecutive or interrupted chances, we find that the statistical averages are
almost identical to those that occur in a single gaming session.

This assumption has always led me to think that 'personal permanence' exists by virtue of the fact that the
numbers are drawn with a frequency directly proportional to their probability of occurrence!

For example, if I analyze with a computer the average output of a series composed lottery game
of 45 numbers (the exact half of all the numbers in the lottery game) and I analyze it, first for even years, then for
odd years, then for alternating years, or for alternating months, or for alternate wheels, or based on a
in any extraction field, I will always note that on average the same 45 numbers come out in a way
uniform (in the game of the lottery we have an average of 2.5 numbers out of 45 considered for each draw)!!!

This leads me once again to think that the consecutiveness of the draws does not affect the related average.
the probability of a specific combination coming out for which it is also possible to continue the session of
I also play after a period of time!

In practice, I have found myself facing this type of necessity only a few times, but I have
always concluded the session, afterwards, without particular problems!!!

Analysis point No. 6:

The 'WINNING ROULETTE' system, in order to be played with a good safety margin, requires a capital.
of 250 units. It goes without saying that after 5 gaming sessions in which I aim to earn 50 units per session
I will have completely eliminated the risk of losing my money and I will be able to play comfortably 'with the money
of the Casino.

Unless you are "extremely unlucky," the risk of losing everything in the first gaming sessions is an event that
there is a very, very remote probability!!!!

Just think that all the possible figures (let's stay in a context of simple chances therefore: RED-
NERO, PARI-DISPARI etc.) that can be formed in 22 consecutive boules are equal to 2 raised to the power of 22.
power equivalent to: 2,034,304 !!!

In practice: only one series out of 2,034,304 will be the losing one (this number also represents the
probability of exit from the negative series.

However, there are many other more or less negative series that can be formed in a sequence of 22 boules.
consecutive that will make you lose (and win) from one to 22 consecutive hits! This is a speech that
I will not address it for the moment and in this setting, I can only tell you that if you lose 250 units at the beginning.
Sessions: either you played the system wrong, or it’s better that you go to Lourdes for a week!!!!

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 7

Analysis point No. 7:
The original D'Alembert system is based on the infamous "Return to equilibrium" which is nothing more than the same
number of outcomes of one chance compared to the opposing one (e.g. in 100 balls, 50 Reds and 50)
Neri, we are facing a state of equilibrium!) and guarantees a unit won for every shot that has been won.
(in the previous example I would have won 50 chips since, out of 100 balls, 50 bets were losing and 50
winners!)

Let's consider that in Roulette there is absolutely no return to equilibrium for the simple fact that
the number "0" (zero) exists and the appearance of this "cursed" number occurs on average every 37 boules. In a
In a case similar to the one mentioned above, I would witness the average outcome of: 55 Reds, 55.
Black and 3 Zeros!

All this leads to an unavoidable situation of imbalance, and the original D'Alembert system, in the long run,
"implode" and makes you lose everything!

The 'WINNING ROULETTE' on the contrary is based on my idea of 'approaching equilibrium' and
of 'hits won-hits lost' and exploits an attack phase and a recovery phase.

In practice, 'WINNING ROULETTE' wins even when the lost bets are greater than the wins.
Twenty! This is one of its remarkable strengths!

Analysis point No. 8:

"WINNING ROULETTE" is played on simple chances such as: RED-BLACK, EVEN-ODD, HIGH-LOW.

His strength in the game is encapsulated in an infinite circle made of won and lost shots.
seeing a draw can be defined as 'simple chance'.

CONCLUSIONS:
I do not dare to comment on point No. 9, I have given my interpretation of 'defeat', but the true defeat of
a system can only be presented when, in the long run, the profit achieved turns out to be lower than the stake put in
game!

And this has never happened to me!!!

Now that you have been patient enough to get here, you can read about the gameplay system in practice.

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 8

 SYSTEM "WINNING ROULETTE" THE GAME IN PRACTICE

I will make an effort and try to make the presentation of the system as clear and simple as possible by
the use of some examples as well.

THE TOOLS OF THE TRADE

“WINNING ROULETTE” is played on even chances.
Equipped with a piece of paper and a pen
Be methodical and don't lose your calm.

GAME RULES
1) At the first hit, bet 1 unit (or chips), for each lost hit increase the bet by one unit and for each hit
I won, I decrease the stake by one unit. In my notebook, I note the total number of chips (which from now on
I will call it "TOTALIZER" that I have available in my "wallet": in my case, there are 250!

2) The ZERO is to be considered as a non-existent shot. From the point of view of the game rules, zero does not
it never happens. From the point of view of progression, however, I need to raise the stake by just one unit since
it should be considered a missed shot.

3) I always bet on the opposite color of the last color that came out. If red comes out, I bet on black; if black comes out...
I bet on red; if I lose three times in a row, it means three reds or three blacks have come out, then I follow the...
instructions of rule No. 4 below.

4) When three reds come out in a row, bet on red; when three blacks come out in a row, bet on black and continue.
I bet on this color until I lose. When I lose a bet, I switch to betting on the opposite color.
to the last one released.

Yes. Three reds have come out, so I have to bet on red (rule number 4) I lose (which means black has come out!)
I bet again on the opposite color of the last one that came out (if black came out, then I will bet red).

THIS IS THE BASIC METHODOLOGY FOR BLANKET BETTING, IN REALITY THERE CAN BE, AND YES
THEY CAN STILL DEVELOP OTHER BETTING METHODOLOGIES BUT WE WILL TALK ABOUT IT LATER IN
REPORT ON THE REASONS WHY I CHOSE THIS METHODOLOGY.

COMMENT:
Up to here, nothing particularly new, you might say, and that's true. It all seems like classic d'Alembert. So what?!
The first point, although not so astonishing, has already emerged but we will discuss it further later. In reality, this methodology...
allows you to play, or rather to find a favorable recovery phase, based on the idea of "*Garcia": to recover everything in one
series of 7
Here it is a bit different as I do not recover everything and not even in a single series of 7, but the favorable series towards which I play are 4 and
precisely

A SERIES ALL BLACK

A SERIES ALL RED
A SERIES OF INTERMITTENCES (NRNRNRNRNR OR RNRNRNRNRN)

UPON VERIFYING THESE SERIES: IF THEY ARE LONGER THAN THREE, I WIN WITH THE SERIES OF REDS OR BLACKS. WITH THE
I ALWAYS WIN WITH INTERMITTENTS (SINCE I ALWAYS PLAY THE COLOR OPPOSITE TO THE LAST COLOR THAT CAME OUT)

Everything clear?
I hope so!
Let's go ahead....

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 9

THE EPISODES:
Let's get to the true engine of the system and analyze the following.

Every time I win a chip, my scoreboard will advance by one unit. So I note the new
result on my notebook.

Example:
I started with 250 chips
I win on the first try
my totalizer goes up to 251.
I note on notebook 251 (this is my new totalizer)
If I win another chip, my total will rise to 252.
I note on notebook 252. (this is my new totalizer)

Consideration; if I lose one of the first two hits and win on the third hit, I BREAK EVEN and therefore my
totalizer remains at 250!

Example:
If I miss the 1st shot, I go to -1 and the totalizer goes to 249 if I win, I go to 251
If I miss the 2nd shot, I go to -3 (2+1) and the totalizer goes to 247 if I win, I go to 251.
If I lose the 3rd shot, I go to -6 (3+2+1) and the totalizer goes to 244 if I win, I go to 250.

From this example, it can be inferred that if I lose within the first three hits, I do NOT LOSE ANYTHING, but if I win for
multiple times on the 3rd hit means that I am gaining a "mathematical advantage" over the house!

The concept of mathematical advantage proves to be decisive in the victory of 'WINNING ROULETTE' and
this is another of the theoretical concepts I developed!

In the original D'Alembert, after winning on the third bet, I should decrease the stake by one unit.
Nothing is more disastrous!!!!!!!!

In 'WINNING ROULETTE', I bet a chip again as if I were starting from the beginning or rather from the top of my
totaller!!!

Is the concept clear!?

Here is another secret of the 'WINNING ROULETTE' system: in every area of the game, every
whenever my tally returns to its initial state (the last note I made in the notebook,
call it what you want!), I go back to betting one chip, then two, then three, etc., as if I were starting over,
maintaining a mathematical advantage!!!!

Later we will see that this is exactly what happens in practice!

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 10

3) The rest of the game plays out more or less like this; even though I am in a phase where I am betting 7-8
I'm facing setbacks, but I am in recovery, I always have to keep an eye on the status of my totalizer.
represented by the money I have in my pocket) and when the money I have in my pocket (in recovery)
they reach the value of the totalizer that I noted in the notebook, I bet a chip again, then two, etc.
etc etc!!!

PRACTICAL EXAMPLE
totalizer on the notebook at 250

Point 1 and I lose, I go to 249, I don't mark anything on the totalizer.

Point 2 and I lose, I go to 247, I do not mark anything on the tally.
Point 3 and I lose I go to 244 I don't mark anything on the tally.
Point 4 and I lose, I go to 240 and I don't mark anything on the totalizer.
Point 5 and I lose, I go to 235, I do not mark anything on the totalizer.
Point 6 and I win, I go to 241 I do not mark anything on the totalizer.
Point 5 and I win I go to 246 I do not indicate anything on the totals.
Point 4 and I win, I go to 250 The money in your pocket is equivalent to the total on the notebook!
STOP!

Point 1 and start over.

In the example shown above, I can see that with 5 missed shots and three won shots, I ended up tied.
maintaining a mathematical advantage of two points won. In fact, to reach statistical equilibrium
after losing 5 shots, I should win another 5!

CAUTION:
Sometimes I have had to face particularly negative phases of the game having to put up with
Betting mat of 17, 18, 20, 22 chips for each individual bet.

These negative phases, as I have had the opportunity to experience, do not last forever since,
Sooner or later, a long series of blacks or reds (or of intermissions) must inevitably occur!

Interspersed among these losing shots (which are clearly in the majority compared to the winning ones) there are almost
always winning hits that allow me to partially play with the casino's money, increasing it.
slightly my actual totalizer.

All of this allows me to make safer and less expensive recoveries (something that with the classic D'Alembert does not)
never happens)!

With a practical example, I could say that I am waiting for a heavy rain to fill a bucket.
of water and in the meantime I start filling my bucket with drops of water. When the big rain
I will need much less water by then to fill the whole bucket!!

In most cases, (with bets of 17, 18, 20, 22 chips per bet) the money I have in my pocket
(real totalizer!) return to equivalence with the totalizer recorded in the notebook (virtual totalizer!)
when descending below the ten units aimed for each single shot.

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 11

In cases like these, the technique I have developed is the following:

1) If you are brave, continue the game until the actual totalizer equals or exceeds the
virtual totalizer, no matter how much!
2) If you are less brave, do as I do: when the difference between the actual totalizer and the
The virtual totalizer can be filled in one go by lowering the bet value.
(non-scheduled decrease of the amount!) that I am making at the value that occurs at
moment between the two totals. If I win, I break even and start over. If I lose, I continue.
increasing the bet I just placed by one unit.

Here is an example:
Hypothetical situation: Difference between real totalizer and virtual one = 25 (E.g. Total. Virt. = 270, Tot.
Real= 245)

- Bet 10 chips on red and win. The difference between the totals now is = 15
On the next hit, point 9 chips and I win. Difference between the totals = 6
Now that the difference between the totals is 6, I don't bet 8 chips but I lower the stake to 6 chips. If I win
I go even and start over if I lose on the next hit I will bet 7 chips etc etc!!!!!

In this way, I have "forced" a lowering of the post that, at least, relieves me a little of the burden.
of the episodes!

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 12

OTHER OBSERVATIONS:
It seems natural that with the application of this method of play, every time a series is formed
from 3 Reds and 3 Blacks, then again 3 Reds and 3 Blacks lose all the blows in a row. This is true but, as
We have already said that these negative streaks cannot last forever.

Secondly, in cases like this, you can try to bet on any chance for about ten shots,
so that this unfortunate series formed by figures of 3 reds and 3 blacks (e.g. NNNRRRNNNRRR etc. etc.),
stop. You can then resume the game normally.

The speech is always the same: encountering sets of twelve similar to the one presented above is an event.
however very rare. From a probabilistic point of view, it is an event that occurs on average once every
4096 roulette balls and keeping in mind that the series of this type (mirror images of each other) are only two.
the probability that this event happens is 1 in every 2048 boules.

We are talking about the only two figures that make us lose 12 strokes in a row out of 12!

THE SYSTEM WINS EVEN IF IT LOSES!

In the tests conducted, starting with an initial budget of 250 units, after about a hundred gaming sessions (from
half an hour to three hours each and about 3 months playing every day) today I find myself having earned 1180 units
without having affected my initial capital which now amounts to 297 units.

Admitting to losing in the immediate future, during a gaming session, all 250 units of my
initial post, I would still have in hand the 1180 units actually collected. This would
would allow me to start over a new "big game" that will end when I find myself at
lose again the 250 units of the initial mail.

From this simple reasoning, it follows that if the system has produced winnings equal to 1180 units in the face of
a single defeat of 250 units. The net profit thus amounts to 930 units for each "match" I played. In
good substance, even if I lose from time to time, I am still destined to remain in profit!!!!

conclusions
To tell the truth, these 'critical' situations are rather rare and for this reason, they are still under study.
a methodical behavior to adopt in these atypical situations.

In fact, we all know that the most difficult phase is precisely that of recovery. Another variant from me
experimented (perhaps a bit random) is analogous to the one proposed above, but involves recovery
of the interval between the two totalizers, by dividing the bet (and the consequent value of the interval itself)
in two consecutive winning hits.

The playing method is all here, easier to play than to explain!

For those who play in an Internet Casino, everything becomes even simpler as some tedious calculations on
Wins and losses are automatically processed by the software!

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 13

 SMALL GLOSSARY AND REFERENCES TO 'WINNING ROULETTE'

AMOUNT: weighted sequence of bets that lead to a predetermined gain, related to

a forecast. If I bet on a simple chance in roulette and predict winning at least one time out of three.
and I want to achieve a minimum profit of one chip, I will place a bet of 1 chip on the first round, if I lose, on the second
Hit point 2 chips, if I lose again on the third hit point 4 chips. In any of the three hits I win, I get
always a gain of a piece.
PROGRESSION: analogous to 'amount'
CHIPS: "token" made of plastic with a monetary value, used to bet on numbers and the
combinations in various Casino games.
UNIT: using any measure, the unit represents the smallest part. In the case of games from
Casino, it means the lowest bet that can be placed.
PIECE: equal to 'Fiches'
PERMANENCE: a sequential set of sorted numbers from a Casino game such as may be the
Roulette.
BOULES: the term boules indicates a number drawn in a spin of Roulette
DRAWING: term used to indicate the outcome of numbers in the lottery and similar games.
NATURAL CYCLE: an event occurs on average in a number of extractions directly
proportional to the probability of the event occurring. In Roulette, the probability of a number coming up is of
1/37 the natural cycle of a number is equivalent to 37 draws.
THIRD LAW: the third law states that in a sample of extractions, equivalent to the cycle
natural combination of numbers considered, one third of the numbers comes out only once, a
another third comes out 2 or more times and the remaining third does not come out at all. On average, if we take in
Considering the 12 dozens in the game of Roulette, we will observe that in 12 consecutive balls, 4 will come out.
say it once, the other 4 more than once and the remaining 4 will not yield at all.
DISCREPANCY: This term refers to the difference between the actual number of presences that this opportunity generates.
register and the theoretical number of appearances that a chance should record in a given number of
hits.
FREQUENCY: a state of frequency occurs when an event manifests in a higher ratio.
in relation to its probability of occurrence.
DELAY: the opposite of frequency.
EQUILIBRIUM: a state of equilibrium occurs when an event manifests in equivalent relation.
in relation to its probability of occurrence.
RETURN TO BALANCE: it manifests when moving from a state of frequency or delay to one
state of balance.
MATHEMATICAL ADVANTAGE: the mathematical advantage is the theoretical advantage dictated by the laws
mathematics and statistics related to probability calculation.
MINIMUM: minimum bet allowed at a gaming table.
CAPPING: maximum bet allowed on a gaming table.
CHANCE: combination or set of numbers.
SIMPLE CHANCE: at Roulette: Red or Black, Even or Odd, High or Low
CAPITAL: all the money I have at my disposal to play.
same meaning as 'capital' used in the game of Poker
PUGLIA: same meaning as "Mass"
BUDGET: the same meaning as 'capital', it indicates the maximum available expenditure.
TASSA SULLO ZERO: it is the mathematical advantage of Roulette, in which there are 37 numbers (zero
understood) but the full amount is paid 36 times the bet.
RANDOM: event entrusted to chance
BET: the sum of money that each player risks.
EPISODE: equivalent to "post."
RETURN: ability to provide a profit, calculated as the ratio between the incurred expense and the results
obtained
FREEZING OF THE BET: in French Roulette, upon the appearance of zero, every chip bet on
a simple chance is frozen until the next shot. If the next shot is made, the chance that
we had targeted, then our chips are unfrozen and return to our ownership. The alternative to
freezing the bet means requesting the Croupier half the value of the bet itself.

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 14

FIGURE: in the game of Roulette, betting on even chances, we can have two possible outcomes, at
Example: Red or Black. In two consecutive spins, we can have 4 possible outcomes, for example: Red-
Red, Black-black, Red-Black, Black-Red. The calculation of all possible figures, as in this case, is
obtained by raising to the power the number of chances times the number of shots. For example, in 8 spins of Roulette I will have
2^8=128 possible figures, obtainable through simple chances. The probability that a figure of this
type (8 figure call) is equivalent to 1/128.

The figures of 3 The figures of 2

NNNNRRRR NNRR
NNRRRRNN NRNR
NRNRRNRN

INTERMITTENCE or ALTERNATION: it occurs when I am faced with a series, for example of Rossi
and alternating blacks (RNRNRNRNRNRN)
PERSONAL PERMANENCE: it is the concept of Permanence applied to events that a single person
it can record. E.g. a person can observe the license plates of cars and consecutively note them all.
those that end with an odd digit and all those that end with an even digit, thus creating a
your personal stay.

Lorenzo of the Wife:

Engineer Lorenzo Della Moglie, originally from Naples but residing in Turin, taught advanced mathematics.
at the University. A scholar and passionate about casino games, he is one of the authors of the book titled: 'The Book
complete casino games.

GARCIA: Thomas Garcia, who lived in the last century, can be said to have been the greatest player of
roulette of all time. He frequented mainly the casinos of Monte Carlo and Bad Homburg, where almost
always after a couple of hours of play he had increased his capital by two or three hundred thousand francs. It is not known
because despite his fabulous winnings he died poor very poor, the reason may be that he liked it
to live a dangerous life always risking everything for everything. (One of Garcia's methods we present in the
page dedicated to methodologies.) The "Garcia" is an example of theoretical perfection, it wins when it presents itself
the series of seven or more, and these will always come up, but after how many hits? It doesn't matter if
on average it is 1.56 every 100 shots, they can remain absent for up to 500 balls and lead to ruin the
player.

D'Alembert: The montante was devised in the 18th century by a famous mathematician of the time, Jean Le Rond.
d'Alembert. He believed that in the long run in roulette the winning and losing bets would be
equivalents (balance). It is precisely at the core of this theory that he developed the rising that we are now about to
illustrate. You start by placing a bet with a unit stake. If you win, you collect the winnings and continue.
to play a piece. After the first loss, you bet two units. In case of a win, you decrease the
bet one piece and return to betting on the unit. In case of further loss, bet 3 pieces and so on. In
In practice, after each win, the bet is decreased by one unit, while after each loss it is increased.
the episode of a unit.
The system gives back 1/2 piece for every hit played (if of course the balance is reached). Without anything
Taking away from the great scientist, such a system does not hold up either in practice or in theory. In fact, not always the
The return to balance brings us the hoped-for benefit.

MARIGNY: Marigny de Grilleau is certainly the most famous researcher, author of the book titled "A Piece
for each 'attack' that can be defined as a milestone in the study of roulette and trente et quarante.
Marigny de Grilleau focused more on the study of the formation of the Ecarte the return
to balance, by using the analysis of original permanences of the Monte Carlo Casino including 64,000
consecutive strikes.
In his book, without using mathematics, he demonstrates the uselessness of many methods and strategies of play.
ultimately proposing a method based on the game of figures, which leads to winning, with the addition of the
statistics on 64,000 hits.

Written by Mauro Michelie [Link]/rouletteAll rights reserved 15