Construction Delays and Resolution Types
Construction Delays and Resolution Types
Excusable delays: the owner gives a time extension for the contractor
but does not compensate financially because it’s neither of their fault
B Activity duration
O 5
7 2 915 15 18 =
completion day
A
S ↳ D
6
7 E
3
.
S &
-Cy
·
ex : = we we
, ,
Path
* : Series
ofactivities that are connected
together
path1 : ABDE
length of path = 5 + 2+ 6 + 3 = 16
days
path2 : ACDE
length of path = 5 + 4 + 6+3 = 18
days Longest path = Critical Path
=> A C D &E
, , ,
are critical activities
citical
activity : an
activity that can't be
delayed without delaying the
project
Started as planned
Started on time, work was stopped for 3 days Because as of day 5 path A
have a 3 day extra margin
CIE480 Civil Eng. Mngmt. © R. E. Awwad Float: amount of time thatyou can be 6
delayed without delaying the project
Fundamentals
Concurrent Delay Example
B was delayed by A
+ delayed by itself
# of days
of delay
possible
12 days
Critical path: ABG Although G can be shortened by 3 days, keep in mind that
after shortening it by all 3 days the critical path become
CDEF (30 days) instead of ABG (32 days → 29 days)
32 days The best choice is to accelerate G by 2 days only
30 days
Increased cost of the contractor’s site staff and supervision More time => more money
Loss of revenues generated from operation of completed
facility in case of delayed completion
If the project is expected to generate revenues (hotel, mall…) then the owner loses these revenues / day
The penalty stated in the contract must be a genuine pre-estimate of the employer’s
likely loss or a lesser [Link] amount has to be realistic (ex: expected to generate 10000$ a day, state 10000$ or even 8000$ per day of delay)
because the value is written in the contract so if it is very high the contractor might be encouraged to increase his bid price
The sums usually agreed on in contracts are small compared to the potential loss by
owners but a realistic figure may act as a disincentive to potential tenderers or result
in over-pricing of bids by contractors. The owner might even lose a good bidder because the liquidated
damages are so exaggerated
Unimportant
It is usually immaterial whether the owner’s actual loss ends up to be greater or less
than the agreed figure: If the actual loss > agreed loss, the owner can’t change the amount agreed on in the contract
As the owner and contractor enter into contract, they both agree on a liquidated damages rate in the case
of a contract breach.
The accuracy of the pre-estimate is to be judged and agreed on at the time the contract is made not at the
time of the breach.
Liquidated damages are desirable in a contract when it is difficult or impossible to
accurately determine the actual damages that the owner would incur particularly on
public projects.
If they didn't agree on liquidated damages then we should hire a 3rd party to estimate the
loss of the owner (much more complicated and complex, takes more time)
They can be graduated to reflect the owner’s increase in damages as the delay continues:
Liquidated damages can be $1,000/day up to a certain date or for a defined number of days, and then
may increase to $1,500/day for delays beyond this date.
CIE480 Civil Eng. Mngmt. © [Link] this is not a penalty for the contractor
E. Awwad 20
Fundamentals
Determining Responsibility for
Delay
Contract Requirements: Refer to General and Supplementary Conditions of
the Contract and most specifically refer to clauses that address delays and time
extensions such as the changes clause, differing site conditions clause, time
extension clauses and others related to claims. Claim: request for time extension or
money compensation
There's a time limit after which a claim can't be filed, it would be
Time limit for filing claims hard to determine who caused the delay after a long time
Description of the claim content: scope definition, cause of claim and explanation, and detailed
breakdown of damages/ extra costs.
Gathering the Facts: necessary documentation to assign responsible party for
the delay: Supporting the claim by extra evidence (specs, emails, photos... )
Design drawings, preliminary schedules, updates and revisions, change orders, daily reports,
emails, site photos and videos, etc.
Analyze documented facts to determine the initial cause of the delay and then
consult with the contract clauses to determine who is responsible for that delay
and whether it is excusable, compensable or none.
Contractor cannot change contract unilaterally, but can only choose not
to agree with sum of order change. His choice are to:
The contractor can't change anything without consulting with the owner, but if the owner changes something believing
that it would cost a certain amount and it would cost more then the contractor can do any of the following:
Sign change order agreeing to price Agrees with owner (settles for owner’s price)
Change order (AIA A201)
Perform work and make claims upon completion Perform change then submits
proof that it costed more than
Construction change directive (AIA A201)
Stop work and be charged with breach of contract (not realistic) No contractor would stop
To be settled
later on
Project title
An explanation why the claim item differs from that already required by
Contract
References to the specific Contract clauses that apply.
An explanation of the cause for the claim
A clear definition of the impacts associated with that claim (extra work,
overtime, delay)
A detailed breakdown of the damages or extra costs with supporting
information
CLAIMS
“No-damage-for-delay”
provision in a contract: the owner
This should be
stated in the will not be liable to the prime
contract such
that if the
contractor or any subcontractor
contractor for monetary claims arising out of
wants to
change it, he work delays. The contractor’s sole
must do so
before signing
remedy in such contracts is an
extension of contract time.
In case of no liquidated damage
More complicated →
clause in contract, the owner will
owner has to hire a have to seek actual damages
3rd party
compensation for a delay caused
by a contractor:
The owner should document
all damage items to the
maximum extent possible.
CIE480 Civil Eng. Mngmt. © R. E. Awwad 27
Fundamentals
Force method of dispute resolution: "dispute, review, board" or "dispute, adjudication, board"
A review board where we would have one person or more designated or suggested by the contractor and another one suggested by
the owner, who would be hired from the beginning of the project (they would be following up from the beginning of the project) so
they would be more knowledgeable of the details of the problem and they would unite the disputes (but it’s costly because they
would paid throughout the project timeline)
T
Arbitration: reference of a dispute to one or more impartial
Commonly used
in construction
expert persons for final and binding determination
Mediation: less formal procedure than arbitration where an
>
impartial mediator helps parties each an agreement but can
not force resolution
Arbitration & Mediation: hiring a third party (one expert or more) that is not biased to look into the matter and judge who is
right or what should be the final resolution
For arbitration the final judgement has to be followed, however, for mediation we might not abide by the resolution (less
formal) so it’s not binding unless they both agree
Arbitration
Dispute is judged by professionals experienced in the construction industry in a
private and informal setting.
There's a certification for it, it's studied not everyone can be an arbitrator (usually CMs study it)
Court decisions are open to lengthy appeals resulting in long and costly delays in
settling many cases however the result of an arbitration hearing cannot be
changes without the consent of both parties to reopen the case.
Party wishing to initiate arbitration makes a written demand to the other side stating
the nature of the dispute, the amount involved, and the remedy sought, and requests
that the matter be submitted to arbitration. (Two other copies should be filed with the
Architect and with AAA)
If the other party agrees to arbitrate, a board of arbitration is selected based on their
experience in the construction field and impartiality to the subject at hand.
Each party can be represented by a counsel and is free to call witnesses and present
evidence, and is entitles to question the other party and its witnesses.
A written copy of the findings and award, signed by arbitrators, is sent to each party.
Arbitrators should treat everyone formally and identically and must assure
themselves that the only evidence they receive comes from the parties.
Both parties are bound to the decision of the arbitration board:
The decision can be submitted to the appropriate court for an order confirming the award.
Once the award has been confirmed, it has the same legal force as any other court
judgement and can be enforced, if necessary, in the usual fashion.
> Endorsing it so that if one party does not abide (it becomes legal)
CIE480 Civil Eng. Mngmt. © R. E. Awwad 30
Fundamentals
More about Arbitration
The AAA does not act itself as an arbitrator however it can handle the
case administration for a specified fee:
Preparing a list of competent arbitrators
Furnishing rules for the guidance of the arbitrators
Appointing arbitrator(s) if asked
The fee for arbitration is a percentage of the original claim (not award).
To avoid that the arbitrator decides on a higher value just to get more money
The decision should simply state only the award on each claim and
should not describe the findings or reasons behind the award because it
could lead to a challenge Because whoever isn't satisfied will try to negotiate with arbitrator
Example: “Party A is to pay $145,000 to party B under claim #1 and pay nothing
under claims #2 and #3.”
A mutually agreed-upon and impartial third party will assist both parties in
reaching an agreeable settlement but lacks any power to impose a decision
Mentioned in the contract
Mediation can be provided for by contractual agreement or resorted to by
mutual consent.
Agreed upon later on
A common contractual clause in recent years requires that the parties first
mediate disputes and escalate their actions to arbitration only in the event that
resolution can not be found through direct discussion or mediation.