La Bruyère's Arrias: A Satirical Portrait
La Bruyère's Arrias: A Satirical Portrait
The Characters is a work published in 1688. The author is Jean de la Bruyère (born in 1645, died
en1696), of which it is the only work to which he dedicated his whole life. Jean de la Bruyère settles
at the Hôtel de Condé in 1685, and is thus close to Versailles that he describes. He is a moralist, it is
to say that he portrays the vices of his contemporaries by drawing vivid and critical satirical portraits.
The 17th century is that of Classicism: of measure, of order, constructed through the figure of
the honest man (measured, polite, learned and not pedantic, social and independent, who adapts) who
opposes stereotypical men. Louis XIV is the king of entertainment and luxury, of splendor and
The etiquette. The courtiers seek to be seen by him. And for this, they indulge in all excesses.
Issues of the text: The excerpt is from book 5, titled "On Society and the
conversation". It thus deals with human relationships. Through the portrait of Arrias, an anti-model of
The Honest Man, La Bruyère seems to conceal a critique of the society of his time, and
notably zealous courtiers.
L He finds them enjoyable, he laughs first: in addition to the wish to be the main actor, he
is its own audience. It develops a love for itself and an attention that it gives to itself.
He is the only one who takes pleasure and interest in his words.
L until bursting: a final burst of laughter but it can also be seen as a metaphor for being
a display of pride that eventually bursts like a balloon.
Summary: presentation of Arrias as a director (self-centered), main actor
(monopolization of speech), or spectator (love for oneself, laughter) of a play
(his lies). But the true director remains La Bruyère who highlights the flaws of character.
d'Arrias, anti-model of the Honest Man who goes against classical ideals.
II. Second movement: intervention of an opposition, the
morale
a) The turnaround (Someone ventures ... no circumstances)
L Someone dares to contradict him: indefinite pronoun and therefore disinterest in the other
a person, one among many others. This person takes a risk by opposing it. One can see
the irony of La Bruyère in the use of this verb. Indeed, one can imagine that the audience it
Knowing this, he refrains from intervening, as it would only serve to double his fervor and not to
stopper.
L and clearly proves to him that he is saying things that are not true: lexical field of the
truth, which opposes illusion, and therefore Arrias.
L "Arrias (...) catches fire": Arrias's reaction is depicted through a metaphor of anger.
Arrias, caught in fault, does not show either self-reflection or humility. To avoid losing.
on the contrary, he gets carried away. He is neither calm nor reasonable as an Honest person would be.
Man.
L "the switch": negative periphrase to refer to the other person. It is about perspective.
d'Arrias who despises the speaker because he contradicts him (thus marking his pretension). This shows that
The conversation is just an opportunity for Arrias to shine in society.
L "I do not advance", "I do not tell", "as far as I know": direct speech, the repetition of
the first person "I" and the restrictive negation "not" mark a change in narration for
give more strength to the portrait. Arrias responds and gains importance as he is now the narrator of the
first person. The negation emphasizes Arrias's bad faith.
L I do not know of any original, I learned it, question, circumstances: we are in
the lexical field of the investigation, of scientific rigor, which gives the illusion of a discourse of truth,
which depicts the enormity of the lie.
L "Sethon", "ambassador of France", "returned to Paris a few days ago": he uses a
argument of authority to give credibility to one's narrative and respond to it
detractor. The mention of a specific place also lends substance to this presentation.
L that I know familiarly, that I have questioned greatly, and that has not hidden anything from me
circumstance.[/i ]": a chain of three relative clauses, which gives a cumulative effect, a
the impression that Arrias's words are more important than those of the speaker. And that in
His interrogation of Arrias is both close to and superior to Sethon, the ambassador of France. He wants
at the same time silence the unwelcome person, and make oneself valuable thanks to displayed proximity with
the one who serves as his alibi, Séthon.
Conclusion: This is the end of the portrait of the fat one, ridiculed to the end. His lie is now at
discovered. In a very brief fall testifying to La Bruyère's talent who in a few lines,
succeeds in portraying the pedant and his punishment, while making us laugh. This caricatural portrait
depicted through this anecdote resonates with the project, which pertains to Classical aesthetics "to punish the
"morals through laughter". text echo: the Molière-esque comedy (T. DIAFOIRUS vs )