0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views5 pages

DISEC MUN Script: Disarmament Agenda

This is a script of how does an MUN DISEC WORKS

Uploaded by

anweshabapna
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views5 pages

DISEC MUN Script: Disarmament Agenda

This is a script of how does an MUN DISEC WORKS

Uploaded by

anweshabapna
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

DISEC MUN Script: (DEMO)

1. Opening of the Session


Chairperson: "The session of the Disarmament and International Security
Committee is now in order. Delegates, please take your seats. The Chair would
like to remind everyone to maintain decorum throughout the session. We will now
begin with the roll call."
Co-chair:
"Delegates, as I call your country’s name, please respond with 'present' or 'present
and voting.'"
(Co-chair proceeds with the roll call.)

2. Setting the Agenda


Chairperson: "Delegates, the agenda for this session will be on disarmament and
international security, specifically focusing on 'Preventing the Militarization of
Outer Space' and 'The Threat of Autonomous Weapon Systems.' You will now have
the opportunity to suggest which topic you believe should be prioritized."
Delegate of Country A (e.g., USA): "Thank you, honorable Chair. The delegate
of the United States believes that the most pressing issue today is the militarization
of outer space, as it poses an imminent risk to global peace and security.
Therefore, the U.S. suggests prioritizing this topic for discussion."
Delegate of Country B (e.g., Russia): "The Russian Federation agrees with the
honorable delegate of the United States. However, we believe that autonomous
weapons pose a far greater and more immediate threat. Thus, we propose
discussing the issue of autonomous weapon systems first."
Chairperson: "Thank you, delegates. We shall now proceed with a motion to set
the agenda. The delegate of the United States has proposed Topic 1 (Preventing
Militarization of Outer Space) as the first item of discussion. All those in favor,
please raise your placards."
(Chair counts the votes.)
"All those against, please raise your placards."
Chairperson: "The motion to set 'Preventing the Militarization of Outer Space' as
the first agenda item passes with a majority. We will proceed with this topic."

3. Opening Statements (General Speakers List)


Chairperson: "We shall now open the General Speakers List (GSL). Each speaker
will be allotted 90 seconds. If you wish to be added to the list, please raise your
placards now."
(Chairperson takes note of the speakers and their order.)
Chairperson: "The delegate of China, you have the floor."
Delegate of China:
"Honorable Chair, distinguished delegates, the militarization of outer space is a
grave threat to international security. We must enforce strict regulations on space
exploration and ensure that space remains a peaceful domain. China urges the
committee to work toward a global treaty that prohibits the deployment of
weapons in space."
Chairperson:
"Thank you, delegate. The next speaker is the delegate of India."
Delegate of India:
"Thank you, honorable Chair. The delegate of India believes that outer space
should be used for peaceful exploration and scientific advancement. We support
the creation of an international framework that will ensure the demilitarization of
space."
(After a few more speeches...)
Chairperson:
"Thank you, delegates. The General Speakers List remains open. We shall now
entertain points and motions from the floor."

4. Points and Motions Raised


Delegate of France: "Motion to open a moderated caucus on 'Establishing an
International Regulatory Framework for Space Weaponry' for a duration of 15
minutes, with each speaker allotted 60 seconds."
Chairperson: "There is a motion for a moderated caucus on 'Establishing an
International Regulatory Framework for Space Weaponry.' Are there any
objections?"
(Pause for objections.)
"Seeing none, the motion passes. We shall now proceed with the moderated
caucus. The delegate of France, you have the floor."
Delegate of France: "Thank you, honorable Chair. France believes that the
development of space weapons will only escalate international tensions. We
propose a regulatory framework overseen by the UN to prevent the weaponization
of space by any country."
Chairperson: "Thank you, delegate. The next speaker is the delegate of the
United Kingdom."
Delegate of the United Kingdom: "Honorable Chair, the United Kingdom
supports the idea of a regulatory framework but stresses that it should not hinder
scientific or commercial activities in space. There must be a clear distinction
between peaceful space exploration and military use."
(After the moderated caucus ends...)

5. Unmoderated Caucus (Informal Debate)


Delegate of Germany:
"Motion to move into an unmoderated caucus for 20 minutes to draft working
papers."
Chairperson:
"There is a motion to move into an unmoderated caucus for 20 minutes. All those
in favor, please raise your placards."
(Chair counts votes)
"The motion passes. The committee will now enter an unmoderated caucus for 20
minutes."
(Delegates begin informal discussions, formulating working papers or
resolutions.)

6. Drafting Working Papers / Resolutions


Chairperson:
"The unmoderated caucus has ended. We will now return to formal debate.
Delegates, please submit your working papers to the dais for review."
(Delegates submit working papers, and the dais reviews them.)

7. Voting on Draft Resolutions


Chairperson:
"The dais has reviewed all submitted working papers. We now have two draft
resolutions before the committee. We will move to a formal vote. Delegates will be
called upon to vote 'yes,' 'no,' or 'abstain' on each draft resolution."
(Chairperson oversees the voting process.)
Chairperson:
"The draft resolution [Number] has passed with a majority of votes. This
resolution is now adopted by DISEC."

8. Closing of the Session


Chairperson:
"We have come to the conclusion of our session. The committee has successfully
debated and passed resolutions on the prevention of the militarization of outer
space. On behalf of the dais, I would like to thank all delegates for their
participation and hard work. This session of DISEC is now adjourned."
(Gavel is struck.)

Common Points and Motions Raised in MUN:


1. Point of Order: Raised when a delegate believes that the rules of procedure
have been violated.
o "Point of order, honorable Chair. The delegate believes that the
previous speaker exceeded their speaking time."
2. Point of Personal Privilege: Raised when a delegate cannot hear, is
uncomfortable, or has a personal issue.
o "Point of personal privilege, honorable Chair. The delegate cannot
hear the speaker clearly."
3. Point of Information: Raised when a delegate wishes to ask a question to
the speaker during formal debate (usually in some formats like British
Parliament but not always DISEC).
o "Point of information to the delegate of China, can you clarify your
stance on space weaponization?"
4. Motion to Open/Close the General Speakers List (GSL):
o "Motion to open the General Speakers List."
5. Motion to Adjourn the Meeting: Raised to end the committee session.
o "Motion to adjourn the session, honorable Chair."
6. Motion to Suspend Debate: Often raised to move into an unmoderated
caucus.
o "Motion to suspend the debate and move into an unmoderated caucus
for 15 minutes."
7. Motion to Extend the Time of Debate: Raised to extend the time for a
moderated or unmoderated caucus.
o "Motion to extend the time of the moderated caucus by 10 minutes."

Common questions

Powered by AI

The DISEC session reflects these challenges through debates where delegates advocated both for stringent regulations to ensure global security and for preserving national interests in space exploration and defense. Countries like France and the UK voiced concerns about exacerbating tensions through weaponization, while at the same time emphasizing the need not to hinder scientific and commercial endeavors. This dichotomy exemplifies the struggle to forge international agreements that protect global security without compromising nations' strategic advantages or economic interests in space .

If a delegate believes debate rules were violated, they can raise a 'Point of Order.' This allows them to address the Chair and point out the perceived violation, such as a speaker exceeding their time limit. The Chair then decides on the validity of the point and takes appropriate action to ensure compliance with procedural rules .

A moderated caucus allows delegates to focus on specific issues within a shorter timeframe, facilitating structured discussions. In the DISEC session on space weaponry, a moderated caucus on 'Establishing an International Regulatory Framework for Space Weaponry' enabled delegates like those from France and the UK to argue for a UN-overseen regulatory framework. This approach encouraged targeted dialogue on the necessity and limitations of regulations, distinguishing between peaceful and military uses of space .

A successful DISEC session is characterized by effective agenda setting, productive debates, well-structured caucuses, consensus-building activities, and comprehensive resolution drafting. Success reflects in the delegates' ability to articulate coherent arguments, engage in constructive dialogue, and negotiate shared agreements on complex issues like space militarization. The smooth facilitation by the Chair, adherence to procedural rules, and willingness of countries to cooperate on international frameworks further demonstrate successful diplomacy efforts .

Delegates argued that militarization of outer space presents a grave threat to international security and global peace. The delegate of China suggested strict regulations on space activities and advocated for a global treaty prohibiting the deployment of weapons in space. India supported the idea of an international framework to ensure space remains a domain for peaceful and scientific advancement rather than military use .

Choosing to address 'Preventing Militarization of Outer Space' first suggests a prioritization of long-term global security concerns that might affect all countries through irreversible space militarization. It demonstrates the committee's focus on international stability and the prevention of a new arms race in the largely unregulated domain of space. This prioritization might also reflect geopolitical dynamics, considering space’s strategic importance, and indicates an immediate requirement to address legally binding measures in space policy over terrestrial autonomous systems .

The motion to move into an unmoderated caucus is crucial for informal discussions where delegates can collaborate and negotiate freely without formal procedural constraints. This setting allows delegates to draft working papers and resolutions collaboratively. It is an essential step in refining ideas, forging consensus, and formulating cogent resolutions that will later be presented formally for a vote .

The main topics for the agenda during the DISEC session were 'Preventing the Militarization of Outer Space' and 'The Threat of Autonomous Weapon Systems.' The priority for discussion was determined by a motion raised and voted upon by the delegates. The delegate of the United States proposed prioritizing 'Preventing the Militarization of Outer Space,' and the motion passed with a majority .

France proposed a regulatory framework overseen by the UN to prevent space weaponization, emphasizing non-escalation of international tensions. The United Kingdom supported this idea but stressed ensuring that such a framework does not impede peaceful or commercial space activities. They advocated for distinguishing clearly between military and non-military uses of space .

Voting on draft resolutions in a DISEC session follows the formal debate and review process. Delegates are called upon to vote 'yes,' 'no,' or 'abstain' on each draft resolution submitted and reviewed. The significance lies in the collective decision-making, as the passage of a resolution indicates a majority consensus on the proposed solutions to the issues debated. It represents the culmination of debate, negotiation, and consensus-building efforts, officially adopting the discussed measures .

You might also like