Balwant Rai Committee:
Recommendations by the Committee:
Three-tier Panchayati Raj system: Gram Panchayat, Panchayat Samiti and Zila
Parishad.
Directly elected representatives to constitute the gram panchayat and
indirectly elected representatives to constitute the Panchayat Samiti and Zila
Parishad.
Planning and development are the primary objectives of the Panchayati Raj
system.
Panchayat Samiti should be the executive body and Zila Parishad will act as
the advisory and supervisory body.
District Collector to be made the chairman of the Zila Parishad.
It also requested for provisioning resources so as to help them discharge their
duties and responsibilities.
Jawaharlal Nehru, defended the panchayat system by saying, “. . . authority and
power must be given to the people in the villages …. Let us give power to the
panchayats.”
Ashok Mehta Committee
The three-tier system should be replaced with a two-tier system: Zila Parishad
(district level) and the Mandal Panchayat (a group of villages).
District level as the first level of supervision after the state level.
Zila Parishad should be the executive body and responsible for planning at the
district level.
The institutions (Zila Parishad and the Mandal Panchayat) to have compulsory
taxation powers to mobilise their own financial resources.
GVK Rao Committee
Zila Parishad to be the most important body in the scheme of democratic
decentralisation. Zila Parishad to be the principal body to manage the
developmental programmes at the district level.
The district and the lower levels of the Panchayati Raj system to be assigned
with specific planning, implementation and monitoring of the rural
developmental programmes.
Post of District Development Commissioner to be created. He will be the chief
executive officer of the Zila Parishad.
Elections to the levels of Panchayati Raj systems should be held regularly.
LM Singhvi Committee & Panchayati Raj
The committee recommended that the Panchayati Raj systems should be
constitutionally recognised. It also recommended constitutional provisions to
recognise free and fair elections for the Panchayati Raj systems.
The committee recommended reorganisation of villages to make the gram
panchayat more viable.
It recommended that village panchayats should have more finances for their
activities.
Judicial tribunals to be set up in each state to adjudicate matters relating to
the elections to the Panchayati Raj institutions and other matters relating to
their functioning.
73rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1992
Significance of the Act
The Act added Part IX to the Constitution, “The Panchayats” and also added
the Eleventh Schedule which consists of the 29 functional items of the
panchayats.
Part IX of the Constitution contains Article 243 to Article 243 O.
The Amendment Act provides shape to Article 40 of the Constitution,
(directive principles of state policy), which directs the state to organise the
village panchayats and provide them powers and authority so that they can
function as self-government.
With the Act, Panchayati Raj systems come under the purview of the
justiciable part of the Constitution and mandates states to adopt the system.
Further, the election process in the Panchayati Raj institutions will be held
independent of the state government’s will.
The Act has two parts: compulsory and voluntary. Compulsory provisions must
be added to state laws, which includes the creation of the new Panchayati Raj
systems. Voluntary provisions, on the other hand, is the discretion of the state
government.
The Act is a very significant step in creating democratic institutions at the
grassroots level in the country. The Act has transformed the representative
democracy into participatory democracy.
Salient Features of the Act
1. Gram Sabha: Gram Sabha is the primary body of the Panchayati Raj system. It
is a village assembly consisting of all the registered voters within the area of
the panchayat. It will exercise powers and perform such functions as
determined by the state legislature. Candidates can refer to the functions of
gram panchayat and gram panchayat work, on the government official
website – [Link]
2. Three-tier system: The Act provides for the establishment of the three-tier
system of Panchayati Raj in the states (village, intermediate and district
level). States with a population of less than 20 lakhs may not constitute the
intermediate level.
3. Election of members and chairperson: The members to all the levels of the
Panchayati Raj are elected directly and the chairpersons to the intermediate
and the district level are elected indirectly from the elected members and at
the village level the Chairperson is elected as determined by the state
government.
4. The Chairperson of a Panchayat and other members of a Panchayat, whether
or not elected directly from territorial constituencies in the Panchayat area,
have the right to vote in Panchayat meetings.
5. Reservation of seats:
For SC and ST: Reservation to be provided at all the three tiers in
accordance with their population percentage.
For women: Not less than one-third of the total number of seats to be
reserved for women, further not less than one-third of the total number
of offices for chairperson at all levels of the panchayat to be reserved
for women.
The state legislatures are also given the provision to decide on the
reservation of seats in any level of panchayat or office of chairperson in
favour of backward classes.
6. Duration of Panchayat: The Act provides for a five-year term of office to all the
levels of the panchayat. However, the panchayat can be dissolved before the
completion of its term. But fresh elections to constitute the new panchayat
shall be completed –
before the expiry of its five-year duration.
in case of dissolution, before the expiry of a period of six months from
the date of its dissolution.
Kuch toh majbooriyan rahin hongi, yuhin koi bewah nhi hota, This
quote is quite relatable to Indian Panchayati Raj system. Our Indian
constitution was bewah with our village governance system because it
had its majbooriyan like they didn’t feel it necessary at that moment,
they didn’t have sufficient resources and etc. But, unn majbooriyon
ko overcome karke, finally, the Indian constitution came up with
Panchayati Raj system in 1992 through 73rd Amendment.
So through this assignment I’ll focus on: Historical Context,
constitutional provisions, significance and challenges. G
Historical Context: The concept of local self-governance can be
traced back to ancient India, where village assemblies, known as
"Sabhas" or "Panchayats," played a pivotal role in resolving disputes,
administering justice, and managing local affairs.
During the medieval period, especially under the rule of certain
empires like the Mauryas, Guptas, and Cholas, village autonomy and
self-governance continued to thrive. However, the extent and nature
of local governance varied across regions, influenced by factors such
as feudal structures, landownership patterns, and administrative
policies of ruling dynasties.
The first major initiative in this direction came with the establishment
of the Community Development Program (CDP) in 1952, aimed at
decentralizing development planning and administration to the village
level. However, the CDP failed to empower local communities
adequately due to its top-down approach and bureaucratic
inefficiencies.
Constitutional Provisions: The Act added Part IX to the Constitution,
“The Panchayats” and also added the Eleventh Schedule which consists of
the 29 functional items of the panchayats.
Part IX of the Constitution contains Article 243 to Article 243 O.
The Amendment Act provides shape to Article 40 of the
Constitution, (directive principles of state policy), which directs the
state to organise the village panchayats and provide them powers
and authority so that they can function as self-government.
With the Act, Panchayati Raj systems come under the purview of the
justiciable part of the Constitution and mandates states to adopt the
system. Further, the election process in the Panchayati Raj
institutions will be held independent of the state government’s will.
The Act has two parts: compulsory and voluntary. Compulsory
provisions must be added to state laws, which includes the creation
of the new Panchayati Raj systems. Voluntary provisions, on the
other hand, is the discretion of the state government.
The Act is a very significant step in creating democratic institutions
at the grassroots level in the country. The Act has transformed the
representative democracy into participatory democracy.
Signifiance of Panchayati Raj institutions:
Grassroots Democracy: Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs)
facilitate direct citizen engagement in local administration,
thereby embodying grassroots democracy in India. By giving
communities, the ability to exercise autonomy, settle disputes,
and advance transparency, PRIs act as vehicles for grassroots
democracy and, in the process, develop a democratic culture
based on local empowerment and participation.
Empowers Rural Communities: By giving rural communities
control over local development and governance, panchayati raj
empowers them. Participatory processes and elected
representatives allow communities to make decisions that are in
line with their goals and requirements.
Social Inclusion: By giving marginalized groups—such as
women, Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and
other backward classes—opportunities for meaningful
participation in local governance, Panchayati Raj promotes
social inclusion. PRIs guarantee representation and voice for
these populations, giving them the ability to have an impact on
decision-making procedures through reserved seats and
affirmative action policies.
Challenges faced by Panchayati Raj:
Political Interference: Because it compromises the independence
and efficiency of Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs), political
meddling presents a serious threat to these institutions. Trust in
local administration can be damaged by outside forces that
might sway PRI decision-making processes for partisan or
personal benefit.
Financial dependency: Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) have a
great deal of financial dependency since they frequently rely
largely on funding from higher levels of government for their
operational and developmental costs. Because of this
dependence, they are constrained by the funding authorities'
priorities and requirements, which reduces their independence
and flexibility in making decisions.
Capacity Constraints: Capacity constraints pose a significant
challenge to Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) as many lack the
necessary human, institutional, and technical capabilities to
effectively fulfil their roles and responsibilities. Elected
representatives and PRI functionaries often face limitations in
areas such as governance, planning, finance management, and
project implementation. This hampers their ability to address
local needs, promote inclusive development, and engage with
stakeholders.
Socio Economic Disparities: Because socioeconomic
differences amplify existing inequities among communities and
obstruct inclusive development initiatives, they pose a serious
threat to Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs). Due to funding
limitations and capacity issues, PRIs frequently find it difficult
to meet the various needs and objectives of underrepresented
groups, such as women, minorities, and economically
disadvantaged people. Inequalities in healthcare, education, and
employment prospects also cause some groups of people to be
more marginalized than others, which feeds the cycle of poverty
and marginalization.
Future Prospects and recommendations
1. Strengthening and Institutional Mechanisms: There is
great potential for the future of local governance in India if
Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) are strengthened and
institutionalized. PRIs can improve their efficacy and
sustainability by allocating resources, engaging in training
initiatives, and growing capacity at the local level.
2. Financial Empowerment: One of the most promising
future prospects for Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) in
India is financial empowerment. Through increased
revenue production from user fees, local taxes, and
resource mobilization, PRIs can lessen their reliance on
outside funding and increase their budgetary autonomy.
Additionally, financial management and budgeting
capacity building initiatives can enhance resource
allocation efficiency, accountability, and transparency.
3. Promoting Social Inclusion: The future of Panchayati Raj
Institutions (PRIs) depends on fostering social inclusion
since it increases PRI legitimacy, representation, and
participation in local government systems. PRIs
aggressively involve marginalized groups, such as women,
minorities, and underprivileged communities, to guarantee
that decision-making procedures take into account a
variety of viewpoints and the requirements of all societal
members.
4. Community Empowerment: Community empowerment is
pivotal for the future of Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs)
in India as it fosters active citizen engagement, ownership,
and accountability in local governance processes. By
empowering communities to participate in decision-
making, prioritize needs, and monitor PRI activities, PRIs
become more responsive, transparent, and effective in
addressing local challenges. Community-led initiatives
drive innovation, resource mobilization, and social
cohesion, enhancing the sustainability and impact of
development efforts.