0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views4 pages

Geometry Application: Mountain Height Calculation

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views4 pages

Geometry Application: Mountain Height Calculation

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Geometry Module 5 DBA

Part 1 - Application
Jackson loves an adventure but always wants to know what he is getting himself into before he
jumps in completely. He decides to take a rock climbing course. He arrives at the course which is
meeting at the base of the mountain. He looks up and decides he needs to know how far UP he
will be climbing. The instructor doesn’t know the height of this location (Jackson is starting to
doubt the instructor’s ability if he doesn't know this simple fact) Jackson needs to figure out a way
to know the approximate height before climbing. Jackson decides to use his highschool geometry
skills to determine the height. He needs a mirror and luckily another climber pulls one out of his
backpack. Jackson places the mirror on the ground so that he is able to look at the mirror and see
the top of the mountain. The mirror is 5 feet in front of him and is approximately 40 feet from the
base of the mountain. ∆ Jackson is 6’4” tall. Approximately how high is the top of the mountain.
Draw a sketch to illustrate the process and be sure to use mathematical language to show and
explain your work.

6’4” is 6,33 feet.


To get the scale factor of the figures, we
must first prove that the two triangles
are similar. From the figure that I have
constructed, it is given that ∆ABC is
intersected by line DE. Line DE is parallel
to BC because the heights (of Jackson
and the mountain) are measured

ground. ∠ABC is congruent to


vertically and perpendicular to the

∠ADE by the Corresponding


Angles Postulate. ∠ACB is
congruent to ∠AED by the
Corresponding Angles
Postulate. By the Angle-Angle
Similarity Postulate, the ∆ABC
is similar to ∆ADE.

Now that we know the two triangles are similar, we can work out the
scale factor.

= = The scale factor for the figure is .


AE 5 1 1
AC 40 8 8

BC = DE × 8
= 6,3 × 8
=50,4
The height of the mountain is 50.4 feet high.

Part 2 - Find the error(s) and solve the problem correctly.


Suppose ∆ABC ∼ ∆RST. Solve for x and determine the length of each side.
Part 3 - Discussion Question
Does a line that intersects two sides of a triangle and is parallel to the third side of the
triangle form two similar triangles?
Use mathematical language from this course to explain your answer. Sketch a picture and
label the vertices. Use the sketch in your discussion answer.

Yes, it creates two similar triangles. If a segment is parallel to one side of a triangle and
intersects the other two sides of the triangle the segment divides the sides of the triangle

triangles share by Reflexive Property like ∠B, completes the Angle-Side-Angle


proportionally just like how line DE is dividing line BA and BC. And the one angle that both

Similarity Postulate. Line BA is proportional to line BD, line BC to BE,


and angle B to itself. ∆BAC is similar to ∆BDE.
Another way is through the Angle-Angle Similarity Postulate. Since line DE is parallel to line
AC and divides straight lines, angles BDA and BAC are congruent, and angles BED and BCA
are congruent by Corresponding Angles Postulate. When two angles are congruent, the
triangles are similar.
Part 4 - Reflection
This question required:
1. Think back over this entire semester. What concept do you still need clarification on?
Have you reached out to your teacher about this module? What are 3 ways that you can
be successful on your final exam? What assignments do you need to review and study
before you take the final exam?
There are no specific concepts that I need clarification on, however, the main thing that I can
struggle with sometimes is remembering the names of the postulates and theorems since I
used to study in another language – it is difficult for me to memorize them by names. I can
be successful on my exam by making notes during lessons and spending much time-solving
problems. I can also contact my teacher when I need help. I don’t have to go through
specific assignments, as long as I solve enough problems and understand everything.
Choose 2 of the following questions:
2. Why do students learn how to do proofs? What job do you think would use the process
of proofs and logical thinking?
Students learn proofs to be able to convince or justify that a statement is true. People like
mathematicians, accountants, or actuaries use these skills. They are logical and strategic
thinkers for organization and need accuracy.
3. Over the course of this module, what concept did you find the most challenging? What
did you do to clarify the concepts in this module to further your learning? How did I move
through roadblocks or challenges?
The Pythagorean Theorem was complicated to me at first. I could understand the steps and
the reasons for every step, however, it took me some time to work them out myself when
solving the problems. I spent more time on it by adding color to the figures after separating
them by construction which helped me draw a clearer picture in my head.
4. Describe a specific LSS resource in addition to the course content that you used in this
module and how it helped you learn the concepts.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The Angle-Side-Angle (ASA) Postulate is critical for establishing similarity because it ensures that two triangles share a pair of congruent angles and a side of proportional length between them. When a segment within a triangle is parallel to one side and intersects the other two sides, the angles adjacent to the parallel line and the segment are congruent by the Corresponding Angles Postulate. The inclusion of this proportional side as a shared segment between the triangles satisfies the ASA criteria, thus confirming their similarity. This postulate effectively links parallelism, proportionality, and angle congruence in forming similar triangles .

Proportionality is key in proving triangle similarity when a segment is parallel to one side of a triangle and cuts through the triangle. According to the Basic Proportionality Theorem or Thales' Theorem, the parallel segment divides the other two sides proportionally. This proportionality, combined with the congruence of the formed angles due to the parallelism, satisfies the conditions of the Angle-Side-Angle (ASA) or Side-Angle-Side (SAS) similarity criteria, thereby proving the triangles similar. Such proportional relationships are essential in establishing a formal geometric proof of similarity .

A line that intersects two sides of a triangle and is parallel to the third side creates two similar triangles due to the Angle-Side-Angle Similarity Postulate. This postulate states that when a line segment is parallel to one side of a triangle and intersects the other two sides, it divides those sides proportionally. Additionally, both triangles share an angle, satisfying the conditions for triangle similarity. The parallel line ensures that the corresponding angles created are congruent, allowing for the Angle-Angle Postulate to also apply, confirming triangle similarity .

Learning how to do proofs is beneficial as it equips students with the ability to logically convince or justify the truth of mathematical statements. This skill is crucial in developing critical thinking and precise reasoning. Professionals such as mathematicians, accountants, and actuaries commonly utilize proof skills in their work. These professions require logical and strategic thinking along with a high degree of accuracy for analyzing and organizing information effectively .

Understanding the names of postulates and theorems is crucial for a student's success in geometry because it allows them to accurately communicate solutions and reasoning during problem-solving. Familiarity with terminology facilitates reading and comprehension of geometric proofs and instructions, enabling students to follow logical sequences and apply the correct rules effectively. Moreover, recognizing the names fosters an organized approach to learning, as students can categorize concepts and relate them to previous knowledge, aiding in retention and application of geometric principles .

Jackson used the properties of similar triangles to calculate the height of the mountain by identifying two triangles formed by his line of sight and the mountain's shadow. By placing a mirror on the ground, he was able to form a smaller triangle with the same angles as the larger triangle that includes the mountain's height. The similarity is verified through the Angle-Angle Similarity Postulate, as two corresponding angles in both triangles are congruent: one being a shared angle and the other due to the parallel alignment facilitated by the mirror. The scale factor, derived from the ratio of distances, allows for computing the mountain's height by scaling Jackson's height appropriately .

Geometric principles, such as similar triangles, can be employed to determine the height of a mountain indirectly. In the scenario described, a mirror is placed on the ground, creating two similar triangles: one formed by Jackson, the mirror, and the top of the mountain, and another formed by the mirror, Jackson, and his line of sight to the mountain's top. By establishing the similarity of these triangles through the Angle-Angle Similarity Postulate, Jackson can determine the mountain's height. The scale factor between the triangles is calculated as the ratio of distances from Jackson to the mirror and the mountain base to the mirror. Using the scale factor, the height of Jackson is multiplied to find the height of the mountain, yielding 50.4 feet .

Solving numerous geometry problems helps students prepare for their final exams by reinforcing their understanding and recall of geometric concepts, postulates, and theorems. This practice builds familiarity and confidence in applying these principles to a variety of problems, enhancing their intuitive and procedural knowledge. Regular problem-solving encourages active engagement with the material and allows students to identify and address areas that may require further review or clarification, ensuring a more comprehensive exam preparation .

Discussing and reflecting on challenging concepts enhances understanding by allowing students to articulate their thought processes and clarify their understanding. Engaging in reflection stimulates metacognitive awareness, helping students identify gaps in their knowledge and address misunderstandings. Through dialogue and discussion, learners can compare their approaches and solutions with peers, gaining diverse perspectives and strategies that can enrich their comprehension. Reflective practices also reinforce memory retention and application skills, promoting a deeper, more meaningful engagement with geometric concepts .

Students often find the Pythagorean Theorem challenging due to the abstract nature of its proof and application. Visualization aids in overcoming these challenges by providing a clearer representation of the relationships between the sides of a right triangle. Using different colors to differentiate between the elements in the figures can help in constructing a mental picture, clarifying the steps and reasons underpinning the theorem. By mentally separating and highlighting parts of the triangle, students can better grasp how the sum of the squares on the two shorter sides equals the square on the longest side, improving comprehension and problem-solving ability .

You might also like