Corrective Action Plan (CAP)
Client Name: ISHKON Industries Project: AVADA Date: 28/05/2025
Incident Description :
Punching position out in AVADA , s- Pile W8 X 10 [11.58 Ft]
The Planning Stage: Is an Emergency Response Action Needed? Yes
Establishing the Team: Team Objectives:
Mr. Mukesh To investigate the point of occurrence & take a preventive action to eliminate the
Mr. Pankaj chance of reoccurrence of the same.
1 Mr. Mayank
Department Name Responsibility
Quality Mr. Mukesh To ensure that the preventive actions are
Mr. Pankaj being followed properly to eliminate the
Mr. Mayank reoccurrence of the same.
Problem Definition: Sketch / Photo of Problem
2A
Punching position out in Chalk Bluff's
- Pile W8 X 10 [11.58 Ft]
Developing Interim Containment Actions: All material available in factory rechecked to find this type of material.
Awareness training given to all machine operator.
3
Springs of pedestal will be checked in each shift.
Page 1 of 4 SCM/CAPA/VERSION 02.2/03.06.2014.
Corrective Action Plan (CAP)
Identifying & Verifying Root Cause:
Possible root causes
Machine Measurement
Man
A new operator operating Machine Pedal
the machine & during Spring broken Slots were checked with
operations material was during operations Gauges
not inserted in to the end & Punch slotted
support of the die. the pile during
insertion
Punching position
out in Chalk
Buff's
Material length short/Extra
Operation stands were not
aligned/fixed properly.
Material Method
4A Cause Remark Valid/in-valid
A new operator operating the machine
& during operations material was not
Unskilled Operator Valid
inserted in to the end support of the die.
Material length long beam As the material was long/short length In Valid
During Operation Machine Pedal was
Machine Pedal Spring broken during operations broken & Punch punched the slots on
& Punch slotted the pile during insertion Beams, while the beam was being Valid
inserted that time
Slots were checked with Gauges All slots checked with gauges 100 %,
& the gauges were inserted properly Valid
but the security can not be checked
with this gauge.
Operation stands were not aligned/fixed All stands to support the beams were
properly. properly fixed In Valid
Page 2 of 4 SCM/CAPA/VERSION 02.2/03.06.2014.
Corrective Action Plan (CAP)
4B 5 Why Analysis
Ask – Why did this happen?
Beam could not be inserted properly during punching.
Ask – Why did this happen?
Punch slotted the beam during insertion of the beam.
Ask – Why did this happen?
Machine Pedestal spring was broken during insertion of beam.
Ask – Why did this happen?
Operator could not recognize that less security beam.
Ask – Why did this happen?
Operator was new for the operation.
Identification of Corrective Action :
5 1- Segregated all the material with less security.
2- Less security material will be marked as a rejection.
Implementing & Validating the CA :
6
Lot checked & found having all the parameters okay.
7 Review the following documents / systems
Document Internal inspection Report
Document Who Responsible Completion Date
Management System Manual
Planned Actual
Inspection Documents Naresh Dhillon 26-05-2025 27/05/2025
8- Photographs
Page 3 of 4 SCM/CAPA/VERSION 02.2/03.06.2014.
Corrective Action Plan (CAP)
Page 4 of 4 SCM/CAPA/VERSION 02.2/03.06.2014.