LLF NOTES- SUMAN DASH BHATTAMISHRA

-Aryan Chowdhury

I. GOD SEES THE TRUTH, BUT WAITS- LEO TOLSTOY

SUMMARY:

Ivan DmitrichAksionov, a young, fun-loving merchant, bids farewell to his family and sets
off for the Nizhny Fair. His wife's premonition of a bad dream foreshadows the tribulations to
come. Along his journey, Aksionov shares tea with a fellow merchant and they retire to
adjoining rooms at an inn. Aksionov, eager to travel in the cool morning air, settles his bill
with the landlord and continues on his way.

About twenty-five miles into his journey, as Aksionov relaxes and plays his guitar at an inn,
authorities arrive and begin questioning him about his recent whereabouts and interactions
with the merchant. The interrogation intensifies when the police-officer reveals the merchant
with whom Aksionov spent the previous night was found with his throat cut, leading to a
search of Aksionov's belongings. A blood-stained knife is discovered in Aksionov's bag,
turning him into the prime suspect. Despite his pleas of innocence, Aksionov's fear and
stammering are interpreted as signs of guilt.

Aksionov is imprisoned, and his life takes a drastic turn. His wife's visit to the jail is filled
with despair, and even she harbors doubts about his innocence. Aksionov, in anguish, resigns
himself to the belief that only God knows the truth and seeks solace in prayer.

After being flogged and sent to Siberia, Aksionov endures twenty-six years as a convict. Over
time, he transforms into a meek, prayerful figure respected by both prison authorities and
fellow prisoners, earning the monikers "Grandfather" and "The Saint". Despite his suffering,
Aksionov maintains his faith and acts as a moral compass within the prison.

The arrival of a new convict, Makar Semyonich, disrupts Aksionov's existence. During the
prisoners' introductions, Aksionov learns Makar Semyonich is from Vladimir and inquires
about the Aksionov merchants. Makar's surprising reaction to Aksionov's story makes
Aksionov suspect he knows more about the murder. Aksionov's suspicions grow when Makar
inadvertently suggests the murderer would have to be the person in whose bag the knife was
found.

1 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
That night, Aksionov is consumed by memories of his past life and overwhelmed by the
injustice he has suffered. His anger towards Makar Semyonich intensifies, and he grapples
with thoughts of revenge.

Aksionov discovers Makar Semyonich digging a tunnel, offering him a chance to escape.
However, Aksionov refuses to participate and contemplates whether to reveal Makar's secret.
When the tunnel is discovered, the governor implores Aksionov to reveal the culprit.
Aksionov chooses to remain silent, stating it is not God's will for him to tell.

Later that night, Makar Semyonich seeks Aksionov's forgiveness, confessing that he was the
one who murdered the merchant and hid the knife in Aksionov's bag. Aksionov initially
expresses his anguish and the irreparable damage done to his life. Ultimately, Aksionov
forgives Makar, finding peace and liberation from his long-held resentment. Despite Makar
Semyonich's subsequent confession and the order for Aksionov's release, Aksionov dies, a
man transformed by suffering and forgiveness. The story underscores themes of injustice,
faith, forgiveness, and redemption.

SHORT PERSONAL NOTES FROM EXCERPTS OF THE STORY:

� When quite a young man he had been given to drink, and was riotous when he had
had too much; but after he married he gave up drinking, except now and then.

Note: a form of mini-cheating on his marital duties per se. this is reflective of what breaking
duties leads you to, it leads to punishment, so that you can reflect on your misdeeds.

� One summer Aksionov was going to the Nizhny Fair, and as he bade good-bye to his
family, his wife said to him, "Ivan Dmitrich, do not start to-day; I have had a bad
dream about you."

Note: being a caring wife, she warns him about the bad dream she had, and that perhaps it
was a sign from God that he must not GO OUT. However, being a not-so God-fearing
person, he did not pay heed to her calls, and moved on. the rest, as they say, is reflective in
the story.

� Aksionov laughed, and said, "You are afraid that when I get to the fair I shall go on a
spree."

Note: this is where he reprimands her wife in playful manner, rubbishing her concerns, and
stating that he might again indulge in playful drinking.

2 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 � "I do not know what I am afraid of; all I know is that I had a bad dream. I dreamt you
returned from the town, and when you took off your cap I saw that your hair was
quite grey."

Note: this is what will soon become his reality, although he would never return home.

� Then he made his way across to the landlord of the inn (who lived in a cottage at the
back), paid his bill, and continued his journey.

Note: a dutiful man, who paid all his dues and never committed the sin of fraud perhaps.

� The police-officer ordered the soldiers to bind Aksionov and to put him in the cart. As
they tied his feet together and flung him into the cart, Aksionov crossed himself and
wept. His money and goods were taken from him, and he was sent to the nearest town
and imprisoned there. Enquiries as to his character were made in Vladimir. The
merchants and other inhabitants of that town said that in former days he used to
drink and waste his time, but that he was a good man. Then the trial came on: he was
charged with murdering a merchant from Ryazan, and robbing him of twenty
thousand rubles.

Note: the charge on Aksionov which was proved in a small trial, still representative of our
current justice system, which many a times, uses the legal fiction, guilty until proven
innocent, and the somewhat lackadaisical attitudes of judges in fast-track courts. the charge:
murdering the merchant from ryazan and theft of 20,000 rubles.

� "We must petition the Czar not to let an innocent man perish." His wife told him that
she had sent a petition to the Czar, but it had not been accepted.

Note: mercy plea rejected, no clemency shown, perhaps, this is what you get for not heeding
to God's warnings in life.

� Then his wife said, "It was not for nothing I dreamt your hair had turned grey. You
remember? You should not have started that day." And passing her fingers through
his hair, she said: "Vanya dearest, tell your wife the truth; was it not you who did it?"

Note: she has suspicions that it might have been him who killed the merchant from ryazan,
perhaps the shrinkling of doubt really killed aksionov's belief that there was some scope of
respite. btw, vanya wow cute.

� When they were gone, Aksionov recalled what had been said, and when he
remembered that his wife also had suspected him, he said to himself, "It seems that

3 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 only God can know the truth; it is to Him alone we must appeal, and from Him alone
expect mercy."

Note: when all materiality perishes in life, you realise that material things can only give
earthly pleasure. Perhaps, for eternal happiness you do need to submit to God.

� The prison authorities liked Aksionov for his meekness, and his fellow-prisoners
respected him: they called him "Grandfather," and "The Saint." When they wanted to
petition the prison authorities about anything, they always made Aksionov their
spokesman, and when there were quarrels among the prisoners they came to him to
put things right, and to judge the matter.

Note: submission to God made him a just but meek man, spending most of his time speaking
and praying to God. No sins were to be committed, for he thought that even a small fight is a
sin and the path of non-violence would let God know his truth.

� Makar Semyonich laughed, and replied: "It must have been him in whose bag the
knife was found! If some one else hid the knife there, 'He's not a thief till he's caught,'
as the saying is. How could any one put a knife into your bag while it was under your
head? It would surely have woke you up."

Note: makar is not resentful of the past crimes committed, nor feels guilty of the crime that
made him here to Sibera. He even mocks Aksionov, stating that it is impossible someone else
killed the merchant.

� "Just you keep quiet, old man, and you shall get out too. If you blab, they'll flog the
life out of me, but I will kill you first."

Note: makar is not willing to submit to his fate and pray to God and still is hungry for the
material world.

� Aksionov trembled with anger as he looked at his enemy. He drew his hand away,
saying, "I have no wish to escape, and you have no need to kill me; you killed me long
ago! As to telling of you--I may do so or not, as God shall direct."

Note: his reasoning was guided by his religious belief and the Godly worth of compassion
and being merciful.

� Makar Semyonich stood as if he were quite unconcerned, looking at the Governor

and not so much as glancing at Aksionov. Aksionov's lips and hands trembled, and for
a long time he could not utter a word. He thought, "Why should I screen him who

4 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 ruined my life? Let him pay for what I have suffered. But if I tell, they will probably
flog the life out of him, and maybe I suspect him wrongly. And, after all, what good
would it be to me?"

Note: he is waiting for the Godly truth to arrive and placate him, and no longer wishes to
return.

� Aksionov was silent, and did not know what to say. Makar Semyonich slid off the bed-
shelf and knelt upon the ground. "Ivan Dmitrich," said he, "forgive me! For the love
of God, forgive me! I will confess that it was I who killed the merchant, and you will
be released and can go to your home."

Note: after witnessing Aksionov's magnanimity, he finally became resentful of his misdeeds
and came to Aksionov for forgiveness. this, however, does not mean, that he means true
forgiveness, he wants instant forgiveness and relief from his guilt, which is much different
from Aksionov's way of submission to God.

� In spite of what Aksionov had said, Makar Semyonich confessed, his guilt. But when
the order for his release came, Aksionov was already dead.

Note: he was finally at peace, no longer hoped for revenge or his longingness to get back to
home. Perhaps, God had finally truly forgiven him by relieving him of his pain and suffering
in the form of death.

ANALYSIS

"God Sees the Truth, But Waits," by Leo Tolstoy, is a story that explores themes of injustice,
faith, forgiveness, and redemption. A deeper analysis reveals the narrative's intricate layers,
moral complexities, and profound insights into the human condition.

● Injustice and False Accusation: The story begins with Ivan DmitrichAksionov, a
merchant, embarking on a journey. Fatefully, he encounters a merchant, shares tea,
and lodges in an adjacent room for the night. This sets off a chain of events that leads
to Aksionov's wrongful conviction. The discovery of the murdered merchant and the
blood-stained knife in Aksionov's bag leads to his arrest. Despite his protests,
Aksionov's fear and demeanor are misconstrued as guilt. The judicial system fails,
and Aksionov is convicted based on circumstantial evidence.

● Faith and Resignation: In prison, Aksionov transforms. Initially, he appeals to the

Czar, but after his wife's visit, he loses hope in earthly justice and turns to God.

5 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 Aksionov's faith deepens during his imprisonment. He reads "The Lives of the
Saints," sings in the prison church, and earns the respect of the prison community,
who call him "The Saint".

● The Weight of Unjust Suffering: For twenty-six years, Aksionov lives as a convict
in Siberia. His physical and emotional state reflects the weight of his unjust
suffering: his hair turns white, he walks slowly, speaks little, and never laughs. The
injustice robs him of his youth, family, and freedom.

● Moral Transformation: The arrival of Makar Semyonich, the real murderer, reopens
old wounds. Aksionov's initial reaction is one of anger and a desire for revenge.
However, when he discovers Makar digging a tunnel and has the opportunity to
expose him, Aksionov hesitates. This marks a pivotal moment in Aksionov's moral
transformation.

● Forgiveness and Redemption: The climax of the story occurs when Makar
Semyonich confesses to the murder and begs for Aksionov's forgiveness.
Aksionov's forgiveness is not merely an act of absolution but a profound moment of
spiritual liberation. By forgiving Makar, Aksionov transcends his suffering, releases
his resentment, and attains inner peace.

● The denouement: Though Aksionov is later exonerated, he dies, suggesting that true
redemption lies not in earthly justice but in spiritual reconciliation.

The story suggests earthly justice is fallible, while faith, forgiveness, and compassion
offer a path to redemption, even in the face of profound suffering and injustice.

CHARACTER SKETCHES

IVAN DMITRICH AKSIONOV

At the beginning of Leo Tolstoy's story, Aksionov is a young, vibrant merchant,

characterized by his love for singing and a generally jovial nature. Though he had been
prone to drinking in his younger days, he had mostly given it up after marrying. Aksionov is
presented as a man with a family and a business, on his way to a fair with the expectation of
selling his goods. His wife's bad dream foreshadows a change in Aksionov's character.

Aksionov undergoes a radical transformation following his wrongful arrest. Initially, he is

in disbelief and vehemently protests his innocence. He is described as frightened,

6 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
stammering, and pale, which is misinterpreted as guilt. After his conviction and
imprisonment, Aksionov experiences despair and loses faith in earthly justice, eventually
turning to God for solace.

Over twenty-six years in prison, Aksionov becomes meek, prayerful, and respected. His
physical appearance changes drastically: his hair turns white, and he walks slowly. Despite
his suffering, he becomes a moral authority within the prison, known as "Grandfather" and
"The Saint".

The arrival of Makar Semyonich stirs his desire for revenge. However, when he has the
chance to expose Makar, Aksionov's moral evolution is evident; he hesitates and ultimately
remains silent. Aksionov's ultimate act of forgiveness towards Makar marks a spiritual
liberation, leading to inner peace and the disappearance of his longing for home. Aksionov's
journey is one of unjust suffering leading to profound spiritual transformation and redemption
through forgiveness.

MAKAR SEMYONICH

Makar Semyonich enters the story much later as a new convict. He is a tall, strong man of
sixty with a closely-cropped grey beard. Makar is initially presented as someone trying to
conceal his past misdeeds. He reveals he is from Vladimir and knows of the Aksionovs.

Makar's character is the catalyst for the story's climax. His inadvertent remarks arouse
Aksionov's suspicions, leading to Aksionov's internal turmoil. When Aksionov discovers
Makar digging a tunnel, Makar threatens him.

The pivotal moment for Makar comes when he confesses to the murder. Overcome with
remorse, he seeks Aksionov's forgiveness, leading to Aksionov's spiritual release. Makar's
confession brings the truth to light, but Aksionov dies before he can be released. Makar's
character serves as the agent of injustice and, ultimately, the catalyst for Aksionov's
redemption through confession and repentance.

AKSIONOV'S WIFE

7 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Aksionov's wife appears at the beginning and during a prison visit. Initially, she is portrayed
as intuitive and apprehensive, with a premonition about her husband's journey. Her dream of
Aksionov's grey hair foreshadows the suffering and injustice he will face.

During her visit to the prison, she is in despair and grief-stricken. She questions Aksionov's
innocence, reflecting the societal doubt and the strain on their relationship. This interaction
deeply affects Aksionov, reinforcing his sense of isolation and leading him to place his faith
solely in God.

While not present throughout the story, Aksionov's wife embodies the impact of injustice
on family and relationships, highlighting the personal cost of wrongful accusations.
Aksionov's reminiscence of his wife emphasizes the contrast between his past happiness and
present suffering.

THE JUSTICE SYSTEM

The justice system, represented by the police-officer, the trial, and the prison authorities,
functions almost as a character. At the beginning it is flawed and easily swayed by
circumstantial evidence. The police-officer's investigation is hasty, and Aksionov's fear is
misinterpreted as guilt. The trial convicts Aksionov based on weak evidence.

Within the prison, the authorities are portrayed as valuing Aksionov for his meekness and
truthfulness. However, their reliance on Aksionov's moral character to uncover the tunnel
reveals the limitations of a system that initially failed him.

Ultimately, the justice system is shown to be fallible. It wrongly convicts an innocent man
and only rectifies its mistake after twenty-six years, by which time Aksionov has already
found peace through forgiveness and has died. The justice system highlights the story's
theme that earthly justice is often flawed and delayed, in contrast to divine justice.

PROMINENT THEMES

AKSIONOV'S FAMILY VALUES

Though not explicitly detailed, Aksionov's family values are underscored by his
interactions and memories throughout the story. At the outset, Aksionov is portrayed as a
family man, bidding farewell to his wife and children as he embarks on his journey to the

8 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Nizhny Fair. The premonition of his wife introduces an element of familial concern and
foreshadows the disruption of their family life.

The most direct illustration of family values occurs when Aksionov's wife visits him in
prison. Her despair and the presence of their children highlight the impact of Aksionov's
imprisonment on his family. Her questioning of his innocence, while painful to Aksionov,
underscores her concern and the strain placed on their marital bond. Aksionov's recollection
of his family during his imprisonment reveals his deep longing for them, highlighting the
emotional toll of separation and injustice.

Although Aksionov resigns himself to the idea that his family has forgotten him, his
memories and longing for them demonstrate the enduring importance of family bonds,
even in the face of prolonged separation and suffering.

INSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE V. DIVINE INTERVENTION

"God Sees the Truth, But Waits" presents a stark contrast between institutional justice and
divine intervention, revealing the fallibility of the former and the ultimate solace found in the
latter.

The justice system, embodied by the police-officer, trial, and prison authorities, is depicted as
flawed and prone to error. The police-officer's hasty investigation and misinterpretation of
Aksionov's fear as guilt highlight the limitations and biases within the system. The trial
convicts Aksionov on circumstantial evidence, showcasing the system's failure to discern the
truth.

In contrast, divine intervention becomes Aksionov's primary source of hope and comfort.
After losing faith in earthly justice, Aksionov turns to God, seeking solace and guidance
through prayer. His faith deepens during his imprisonment, as evidenced by his reading of
"The Lives of the Saints" and singing in the prison church.

The story emphasizes the limitations of earthly justice and the ultimate triumph of divine
truth. While the institutional justice system fails Aksionov, it is divine intervention, or at
least faith in God, that ultimately brings about his redemption and inner peace.

FORMS OF FORGIVENESS

The story explores two distinct forms of forgiveness: Aksionov's forgiveness of Makar
Semyonich and the forgiveness Aksionov seeks from God.

9 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Aksionov initially seeks justice and freedom, appealing to the Czar and protesting his
innocence. However, after years of unjust suffering, he shifts his focus from seeking earthly
justice to seeking divine forgiveness and understanding. His forgiveness of Makar
Semyonich is a profound act of spiritual liberation. By forgiving his tormentor, Aksionov
transcends his resentment and attains inner peace. This forgiveness is not sought but given
freely, marking a significant turning point in Aksionov's spiritual journey.

Makar Semyonich seeks forgiveness from Aksionov after confessing to the murder. His
remorse is palpable as he begs for Aksionov's absolution, recognizing the immense suffering
he has caused. Makar's confession is driven by guilt and a desire to alleviate his conscience.
Unlike Aksionov, Makar seeks forgiveness to relieve his own burden and potentially rectify
the earthly consequences of his actions.

The contrast between these forms of forgiveness highlights the transformative power of
forgiveness and its varying motivations. Aksionov's forgiveness is a selfless act that
liberates him from resentment, while Makar's repentance is driven by guilt and a desire for
redemption.

DEATH AS RELIEF

In "God Sees the Truth, But Waits," death emerges as a form of relief, offering solace and
liberation from earthly suffering. After enduring twenty-six years of unjust imprisonment,
Aksionov finds peace in forgiveness and loses his longing for home.

Despite Makar Semyonich's confession and the subsequent order for Aksionov's release,
Aksionov dies before regaining his freedom. His death signifies a release from the burdens
of his earthly existence and a transition to a higher spiritual plane.

Aksionov's death is not portrayed as tragic but as a peaceful culmination of his spiritual
journey. It underscores the story's theme that true redemption lies not in earthly justice but in
spiritual reconciliation.

II. THE SUBMERGED VALLEY BY MANOJ BAS

SUMMARY

In the story “The Submerged Valley” Manoj Das portrays rapid changes taking place in the
life of people living in Indian villages due to developments in science and technology in early
twentieth century. The story reflects dominant features of the rural culture. The narrator of

10 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
the story critically views the ongoing changes in modern society. The story takes place in a
village.

The story centres around the character of father and son. The father who is an engineer
represents modern society. On the other hand, the son who is the child supports the traditional
way of life of the villagers. He represents the public voice of the villagers. The authentic rural
sensibility is evoked by the setting of the story. At the beginning of the story, the narrator
describes his village as follows:

“We become conscious of our village the day our headmaster asked the students of Class
Three to write an essay on the topic. So far, we had taken the village for granted-like our
breathing or our mother’s love. But thereafter the elements that made the village – the trees,
the pools, the Shiva temple and the hillock adjacent to it – had begun to look significant.”

There is a beautiful description of Nature at the beginning of the story. The trees are
personified. The narrator while describing the trees states:

“The trees that stood in front of our school were as human to us as the one of wandering bull
of Lord Shiva. One of the trees looked as if it knelt down in meditation. Two more were never
tired of chattering between them. If the teacher had scolded or thrashed us, they seemed to be
sympathising with us. At the approach of a vacation, they seemed to be talking of the many
sweet moments that were in store for us.”

Further, the village is going to be submerged on account of the construction of a dam by the
Government. The villagers as well as the narrator got this news. They became gloomy. They
came to the narrator’s father to use his influence to stop its execution. The narrator states the
deep-rooted love of villagers for their native place as follows:

“Mother wept. By and by several respectable men of our area visited us and not one of them
went back without shedding tears”

The ‘native place’ is the dearest thing to the villagers. The villagers’ love for the land is a
prominent feature of rural culture. They don’t want to be separated from their “God given
lands”.

The father heard in silence the appeal made by the villagers. Then he reveals the benefits of
the construction of the dam. He remains unmoved by the emotional account of the past
history of his village and explains:

11 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
“Where is Harapa today and where is Babylonia? Time has licked them off – just for the
sake of change. On the other hand, if we are losing our lands, it is for a change for the better,
for the welfare of a larger population. And we ought not to ignore the fact that the
Government is ready to compensate for our loss and to provide us with every facility for
rehabilitation.”

He consoles the villagers. He tells them about the compensation and rehabilitation schemes of
the Government for the affected villagers. At last, the villagers reconciled the situation. Half
of the selected alternative site is a valley eighteen miles away. They carried their deities and
the bull of Lord Shiva with them. The rest chose cash compensation and dispersed in bazaars
and towns in search of jobs.

While departing from the village, the villagers expressed their attachment to their soil. The
narrator states: “We heard that on the eve of their departure, most of the people rolled on the
ground, crying and beating their heads against it and smearing themselves with the soil”

Five years have passed since the making of the dam. The writer critically gives details of the
benefits of the dam as follows: “Three districts has now less to fear from floods. Regulated
irrigation gave some boost to agriculture, though increase in population did not let it mean
anything more than a statistical satisfaction”.

The people did not receive the benefits which were promised when the village was
submerged. After five years, the locality has been completely changed. Two decent
bungalows stood on two ends of the embankment. A cluster of small buildings was
constructed for the dam officials. A bazaar has also been established in the locality. In this
way, the whole face of the village is changed in the process of modernization. For this
change, the villagers have sacrificed their native place.

The narrator and his family go back to the village when there is a lack of rain leads to a
reduction in water levels and the hilltop and the top of the village temple are visible. Many of
the displaced villagers also come back to visit the hilltop and find Abolkara (a member of the
village who was considered crazy and disobedient) sitting there and conclude that he stayed
underwater for five years after the dam was built. Once the water began to rise again the dam
and everyone started to leave Abolkara claimed that he would stay and go under the water
again. All the visitors left the place by boat and launched except Abolkara, who refused to
leave the place. But the narrator’s father risking his life brought Abolkara in his launch and
saved the life of a rude orphan boy. It shows that though he is practical, he has respect for the

12 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
forefathers of the village. He has also a love for his native place. Thus, the story suggests that
in the process of change which is encouraged by deliberate measures, a part of the traditional
culture may suffer extinction.

CHARACTER SKETCHES

THE NARRATOR

The narrator is a young child at the time of the events, providing an innocent perspective on
the unfolding drama. The narrator's point of view allows the reader to witness the emotional
impact of the impending submergence on the family and the community. The narrator's
observation of the mother's tears and the villagers' pleas highlights the human cost of
progress.

THE FATHER

The father, an engineer involved in the dam project, embodies the complexities of
development and progress. He is portrayed as a figure of authority and reason, explaining the
necessity of the dam despite the villagers' resistance. He attempts to balance his professional
responsibilities with his empathy for the displaced community. The father's character
represents the difficult choices and moral compromises inherent in projects that bring about
significant social and environmental change.

THE MOTHER

The mother represents the emotional and personal impact of displacement. Her initial shock
and sorrow at seeing the dam site reveal her deep connection to the village and its way of life.
She sympathizes with the villagers and is concerned about the well-being of others, such as
Abolkara. The mother embodies the emotional and human cost often overlooked in the
pursuit of progress.

ABOLKARA

Abolkara is perhaps the most intriguing character in the story, blending reality and folklore.
He is described as the "funny hero of a series of folktales popular in our region". His
appearance and claims of surviving underwater for five years by clinging to a submerged
rock add an element of the surreal to the narrative.

13 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Abolkara's character can be interpreted in several ways:

● A symbol of resistance:Abolkara's refusal to leave the submerged area can be seen as

a form of resistance against the forces of change and displacement.

● A link to the past: As a figure from local folktales, Abolkara represents the cultural
heritage and traditions that are threatened by the dam project.

● An embodiment of the absurd: His outlandish claims and unwavering commitment

to his story inject a sense of the absurd into the narrative, questioning the nature of
reality and truth.

● A commentator on the present:Abolkara's presence serves as a reminder of what is

being lost and the potential for the community's history to be submerged along with
the valley.

In the story, Abolkara is described as wearing a beard and sitting on a rock. When questioned
about how he managed to breathe underwater for five years, Abolkara proudly says, "Like
that, like that!' blabbered Abolkara proudly, in his usual weird and indistinct tone and style,
throwing his arms in the air". Despite the father's warning, Abolkara repeats that he has been
there all the time. As the boats start leaving, Abolkara hopes that the boats would come
down, frightened. Ultimately, Abolkara slipped over the other side of the rock ready to
plunge into the surging water. When Abolkara reappears at the bungalow later, he is
shivering like a wet squirrel, but smiling.

Abolkara's character serves to highlight the disruptive nature of the changes occurring in
the village.

THEMES

"The Submerged Valley" explores several interwoven themes, most notably the clash
between modernity and traditionalism, and the ambiguous symbolism of Abolkara. Other
relevant themes include displacement and loss, the cost of progress, and the power of
folklore.

MODERNITY VERSUS TRADITIONALISM

The central conflict in "The Submerged Valley" arises from the tension between modernity,
represented by the dam project, and the traditional way of life of the villagers. The engineer
father embodies modernity and the idea of progress, as he is directly involved in the
construction of the dam, which he defends as necessary for the welfare of a larger population.
14 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
This progress, however, comes at the cost of displacing the villagers from their ancestral
lands. The villagers' emotional appeal to the father highlights the deep connection they have
to their land and traditions, which are threatened by the forces of modernity. The mother's
initial shock and sorrow exemplify the personal impact of this clash, as she recognizes the
emotional and cultural significance of what is being lost. The impending submergence of the
village symbolizes the overwhelming power of modernity to erase traditional ways of life.
The narrative suggests that while modernity promises progress and development, it often
disregards the human cost and the destruction of cultural heritage.

ABOLKARA AS A BEACON

Abolkara is a multifaceted character whose significance extends beyond a simple symbol of

hope. While it can be argued that he embodies unwavering hope, his role is more complex
and open to interpretation.

Abolkara's complexities:

● Resistance:Abolkara's refusal to leave the submerged area can be seen as a form of

resistance against the changes and displacement.

● Link to the past: As a figure from local folktales, he represents the cultural heritage
and traditions threatened by the dam project.

● Embodiment of the absurd: His claims inject a sense of the absurd into the
narrative, questioning the nature of reality and truth.

● Commentator on the present:Abolkara's presence serves as a reminder of what is

being lost and the potential for the community's history to be submerged.

Abolkara's actions and claims challenge the straightforward notion of progress and invite
reflection on what is truly valuable.

DISPLACEMENT AND LOSS

The theme of displacement and loss permeates "The Submerged Valley," highlighting the
emotional and cultural consequences of the dam project. The villagers face the loss of their
homes, their ancestral lands, and their way of life. This loss is not only material but also
deeply emotional, as their connection to the land is tied to their identity and heritage. The
mother's sorrow and the villagers' pleas underscore the profound sense of grief and uprooting
that comes with displacement. The submergence of the valley symbolizes the erasure of
their history and the disruption of their community.

15 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
THE COST OF PROGRESS

The narrative explores the ethical implications of development and the sacrifices made in the
name of progress. The father's role as an engineer places him in a difficult position, as he is
both a facilitator of progress and a witness to its destructive consequences. The story raises
questions about whether the benefits of progress outweigh the costs of displacement,
environmental damage, and cultural loss. It suggests that progress should not come at the
expense of human suffering and the destruction of heritage.

THE POWER OF FOLKLORE

Folklore plays a significant role in "The Submerged Valley," adding layers of meaning and
complexity to the narrative. Abolkara, as a figure from local folktales, represents the power
of storytelling to shape perceptions and preserve cultural memory. His presence blurs the
lines between reality and myth, challenging the authority of the rational and the modern. The
story suggests that folklore can serve as a form of resistance, preserving cultural identity in
the face of overwhelming change.

MADHULIKA’S ANALYSIS

Expanding on the theme of human connection with nature in Manoj Das's The Submerged
Valley, the story delves into the profound sense of belonging that the villagers feel towards
their native land. The physical landscape is not just a backdrop but a living, breathing entity
that shapes their identity, emotions, and daily existence. This connection is so deeply
ingrained that the villagers, including the narrator and his family, never truly reflect on it
until the threat of losing their village looms large.

At the heart of this connection is the way nature is portrayed as a vital, almost human-like
presence. The trees around the village school, which the narrator describes as being “as
human to us as the wandering bull of Lord Shiva,” offer solace and companionship to the
children. By personifying the trees as meditating or chattering, Das imbues nature with a
sense of consciousness that parallels the villagers’ own emotions. Nature becomes a silent
witness to the villagers’ lives, responding empathetically to their joys and sufferings. This
personification underscores how nature is intertwined with their lived experience, shaping
their cultural and spiritual worldview.

The villagers’ love for their land extends beyond simple nostalgia or practicality. It embodies
a sacred connection, symbolized by their religious customs and the importance of the soil

16 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
itself. Their weeping and physical attachment to the ground, when they hear about the
village’s submergence, reflect an emotional and spiritual loss, not just the loss of property or
a place to live. The land is tied to their ancestors, their deities, and their sense of belonging in
the world, making the idea of leaving it not just inconvenient but soul-wrenching.

The father, representing the rational, modern world, sees the loss of the village as a small
price to pay for the greater good. He views the dam as a symbol of progress and a necessary
sacrifice for the larger welfare of society. His detached response, comparing the village’s
disappearance to the ancient ruins of Harappa and Babylonia, points to a pragmatic view of
history as ever-changing, with old civilizations inevitably making way for new ones. To him,
the transformation of the landscape is a natural consequence of modernization and
technological advancement.

However, the story also critiques this view by showing that the promised benefits of
modernization are not as substantial as they appear. Although the dam is meant to control
floods and improve irrigation, the actual impact is minimal—merely a “statistical
satisfaction.” The deeper cultural and emotional losses, which cannot be measured in
numbers or development projects, are far more significant. The displacement of the villagers
scatters their community, eroding their shared traditions, and leaving them disconnected from
the land that once defined their way of life. This dislocation mirrors the broader theme of
modernization erasing the uniqueness of rural cultures in favour of homogenized progress.

Abolkara’s role in the story adds another dimension to the human-nature relationship. His
refusal to leave the submerged village, even when surrounded by water, symbolizes an
unyielding bond with the land, one that defies logic and reason. To the villagers, Abolkara
represents the spirit of resistance against change, clinging to the past in a way that seems
foolish to the modern mind. Yet, his character highlights a deeper truth: that some
connections to nature and heritage are so intrinsic that they cannot be broken, even by the
forces of modernization. His choice to remain in the submerged village, despite the rising
waters, is a poignant metaphor for the human desire to remain rooted in one’s origins, no
matter how drastically the world changes around them.

The father’s act of rescuing Abolkara reveals a layered complexity in his character. Although
he initially champions progress, his willingness to risk his life for a “rude orphan boy” shows
that, deep down, he respects the villagers’ attachment to their land. This act of compassion
suggests that even those who advocate for modernization may still harbour a deep, albeit

17 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
conflicted, connection to their roots and traditions. The father’s decision to save Abolkara can
be seen as a gesture of reconciliation between the old and the new, acknowledging that
progress should not entirely erase the past.

In conclusion, The Submerged Valley explores the delicate balance between progress and
tradition, modernization and nature. The story suggests that while technological
advancements are inevitable and often beneficial, they come at a cost—specifically, the loss
of cultural and spiritual ties to the land. Das portrays the land not as an abstract resource to be
used and developed but as an essential part of human identity and memory. The villagers’
profound connection to their soil reflects a universal human desire to remain connected to
nature, even as the forces of change threaten to wash away the old ways of life. Through this
narrative, Das questions whether true progress can ever be achieved if it entails severing the
deep, life-sustaining bonds that connect people to their natural surroundings.

III. AND STILL I RISE- MAYA ANGELOU

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

This is probably Maya Angelou’s best-known poem. Written in 1978, it is a wonderfully

defiant, human, uplifting cry from the deep heart of America, which tells a story that speaks
to us all. (Nelson Mandela read the poem at his inauguration) The poem roots itself in the
history of the African-American people with its talk of slavery and overcoming oppression.
But the poem does not speak only to one people, it speaks of the universal notion of
downtrodden people. It is intended to be the voice of the unheard/voiceless. Two kinds of
oppression are addressed: racial and [Link] poem is a powerful declaration of self-
respect and resilience in the face of oppression and adversity. It employs a direct and defiant
tone, celebrating the speaker's unwavering spirit.

LYRIC STYLE

This poem includes 43 lines in total, made up of seven quatrains and two end stanzas which
help reinforce the theme of individual hope, with the phrase "I rise" being repeated in mantra
fashion. The rhyme scheme is abcb, which tightly knits the stanzas together. It's worth going
through the rhyme's effect because the full rhymes such as eyes/cries, hard/backyard,
surprise/thighs continue up to the last two stanzas when the scheme changes from abcb to
abcc and aabb, giving an absolute solid ending to the piece.

18 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
THEMES

Resilience and Overcoming Adversity: The most prominent theme in "Still I Rise" is the
speaker's resilience. Despite being "trod[den]...in the very dirt," the speaker confidently
asserts, "still, like dust, I'll rise". This resilience is not just about survival but about thriving
and maintaining one's spirit despite attempts to diminish it. The repeated declaration, "I rise,"
reinforces this theme of overcoming.

● Self-Respect and Defiance: The poem exudes self-respect and defiance against those
who seek to oppress or demean the speaker. The speaker questions why their
"sassiness" and "haughtiness" upset others, suggesting an unapologetic embrace of
their own identity and self-worth. This defiance is further emphasized by the lines,
"You may shoot me with your words, / You may cut me with your eyes, / You may
kill me with your hatefulness, / But still, like air, I’ll rise".

● Identity and Pride: "Still I Rise" celebrates Black identity and pride. The speaker
rises "Out of the huts of history’s shame" and declares, "I'm a black ocean, leaping
and wide". This symbolizes the strength, vastness, and depth of Black history and
culture. The speaker also identifies as "the dream and the hope of the slave,"
connecting personal resilience to the historical struggles and aspirations of their
ancestors.

● Triumph Over Historical Oppression: The poem directly addresses the historical
oppression faced by Black people. The speaker rises "Up from a past that’s rooted in
pain / I rise / Leaving behind nights of terror and fear / I rise / Into a daybreak that’s
wondrously clear". This signifies a movement from a past marked by suffering to a
future filled with hope and liberation. The "gifts that my ancestors gave" are also
acknowledged, suggesting the strength and heritage inherited from those who came
before.

● Confidence and Self-assuredness: The speaker possesses unwavering confidence

and self-assuredness, which is conveyed through vivid metaphors. For example, the
lines "I walk like I've got oil wells / Pumping in my living room" and "I laugh like
I've got gold mines / Diggin’ in my own backyard" illustrate a sense of inner wealth
and abundance that cannot be diminished by external forces. Similarly, "I dance like
I've got diamonds / At the meeting of my thighs" suggests an unshakeable sense of
self-worth and joy.

19 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
THE BLACK FEMINIST MOVEMENT CONNECTION

Resilience and Strength in the Face of Adversity: The poem's central theme of resilience
aligns closely with Black feminism's emphasis on the strength and perseverance of Black
women. Black feminists often highlight the ways in which Black women have historically
been forced to develop resilience in order to survive and thrive in the face of systemic
oppression. The speaker's repeated assertion, "I rise," serves as a testament to the enduring
spirit of Black women.

Reclaiming Identity and Challenging Beauty Standards: "Still I Rise" challenges

oppressive beauty standards and reclaims Black women's bodies and sexuality. Black
feminism critiques the ways in which mainstream beauty standards often exclude or
marginalize Black women, and it celebrates the diversity and beauty of Black bodies. When
the speaker asks, "Does my sexiness upset you? / Does it come as a surprise / That I dance
like I've got diamonds / At the meeting of my thighs?", the speaker defies attempts to shame
or diminish Black women's sexuality and self-expression, and celebrates their bodies as
sources of power and joy.

Celebrating Black Womanhood and Sisterhood: Black feminism emphasizes the

importance of Black women's voices and experiences, creating spaces for Black women to
share their stories and support one another. The poem creates a sense of solidarity and
empowerment for Black women, affirming their worth and potential.

Historical and Ancestral Connections: In "Still I Rise," the speaker rises "Out of the huts of
history’s shame", connecting personal resilience to the historical struggles and aspirations of
their ancestors. The line, "I am the dream and the hope of the slave", acknowledges the
legacy of slavery and the ongoing fight for liberation.

Self-Assertion and Defiance: Black feminism encourages Black women to assert their rights
and challenge systems of oppression. The speaker's unapologetic embrace of her "sassiness"
and "haughtiness" reflects a refusal to be silenced or intimidated. The speaker directly
confronts those who seek to oppress her, declaring, "You may shoot me with your words, /
You may cut me with your eyes, / You may kill me with your hatefulness, / But still, like air,
I’ll rise". This defiance embodies the spirit of Black feminism, which calls for Black women
to resist oppression and demand justice.

20 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
LITERARY DEVICES

Maya Angelou's "Still I Rise" employs a variety of literary devices to convey its powerful
message of resilience, self-respect, and triumph over adversity.

REPETITION

Repetition is a central device in "Still I Rise," particularly in the repeated phrase "I rise". This
repetition reinforces the speaker's unwavering determination to overcome obstacles and
oppression. The recurrence of "You may..." also emphasizes the various forms of adversity
the speaker faces, against which the speaker contrasts their inevitable rising.

METAPHOR

The poem is rich in metaphorical language, which enhances its thematic depth:

● "I walk like I've got oil wells / Pumping in my living room": This metaphor
suggests inner wealth and abundance, symbolizing the speaker's inherent value and
self-sufficiency.

● "I laugh like I've got gold mines / Diggin’ in my own backyard": This illustrates a
sense of joy and contentment that cannot be diminished by external forces, implying a
deep, personal source of happiness.

● "I dance like I've got diamonds / At the meeting of my thighs": This metaphor
celebrates the speaker's sexuality and self-worth, suggesting an unshakeable sense of
joy and confidence.

● "I'm a black ocean, leaping and wide": This symbolizes the strength, vastness, and
depth of Black history and culture. The ocean metaphor conveys a sense of
boundlessness and power, reflecting the resilience and potential of Black identity.

● "I am the dream and the hope of the slave": By identifying with the aspirations of
enslaved ancestors, the speaker connects personal resilience to the historical struggles
and hopes of their community.

SIMILE

Similes are used to draw comparisons that amplify the speaker's resilience and defiance:

● "still, like dust, I'll rise": This simile conveys the idea that, like dust which is
impossible to keep down, the speaker's spirit cannot be suppressed, no matter how
hard others try.

21 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 ● "still, like air, I’ll rise": Similar to the dust comparison, this suggests the speaker,
like air, is an essential force that cannot be contained or destroyed.

IMAGERY

Angelou uses vivid imagery to evoke strong emotions and paint a picture of both oppression
and resilience.

● "You may trod me in the very dirt": This creates a visceral image of mistreatment
and degradation, highlighting the harsh realities of oppression.

● "You may shoot me with your words, / You may cut me with your eyes, / You
may kill me with your hatefulness": These lines create a powerful image of the pain
and violence inflicted through language and prejudice.

● "Leaving behind nights of terror and fear / I rise / Into a daybreak that’s
wondrously clear": This evokes a sense of moving from a dark, oppressive past into
a future filled with hope and liberation.

RHETORICAL QUESTIONS

The poem employs rhetorical questions to challenge and provoke the reader:

● "Does my sassiness upset you? / Why are you beset with gloom?": These
questions confront those who are bothered by the speaker's confidence and self-
assurance, questioning their motives and reactions.

● "Does my haughtiness offend you?": This challenges the listener's perception and
expectations, suggesting the speaker's self-respect is a form of resistance.

● "Does my sexiness upset you? / Does it come as a surprise / That I dance like I've
got diamonds / At the meeting of my thighs?": This defies attempts to shame or
diminish the speaker's sexuality and self-expression, celebrating her body as a source
of power and joy.

TONE

The tone of "Still I Rise" is defiant, confident, and self-assured. The speaker directly
confronts their oppressors with unwavering self-belief. This tone reinforces the poem's
message of resilience and empowerment.

NOTES ON BLACK FEMINISM READING AND CORRELATION WITH STILL I RISE

22 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
The historical evolution of Black feminism is rooted in Black women's struggles against both
racial and gender oppression in the United States. Black feminist thought incorporates self-
definition, addressing interlocking oppressions, integrating thought with activism, and
recognizing cultural heritage as a means of resistance.

Historical Context and Waves of Feminism:

● First Wave: The first wave of feminism was linked to the abolitionist movement.
Black women developed a feminist consciousness reflecting their experiences as
Black women and the sexism they shared with White women.

o During the abolitionist movement (1830-1865), enslaved Black women faced

constant sexual abuse, while free Black women had limited legal recourse.

o Myths surrounding Black womanhood, such as the Jezebel/Mammy

dichotomy, contributed to their victimization.

o Black female abolitionists campaigned for equal rights within organized Black
abolitionism. Sojourner Truth, for example, used theological arguments to
advocate for the abolition of slavery and equal rights for all, highlighting the
intersection of race and gender.

o After the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment, tensions arose between

feminists and abolitionists over suffrage. Despite facing exclusion from White
women, African American women continued to fight for enfranchisement,
believing it was crucial for protecting their rights and improving their
conditions.

● Second Wave: The second wave of feminism was linked to the Civil Rights
Movement. Black women participated in the struggle for justice and equality.

o Despite the sexism encountered from men in the movement, Black women
held individuals accountable.

o Black women were forced to navigate the complexities of race and gender,
often facing the dilemma of choosing between movements against racism or
chauvinism. Romantic and sexual interactions between White women and
Black men caused tension, with Black women fearing political usurpation.

23 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 o Black women were haunted by myths of domineering females, while White
women were seen as "forbidden fruit". Although Black women had issues with
male chauvinism, they could not abandon the civil rights struggle.

o Black feminists organized against chauvinism, forming separate women's

organizations and consciousness-raising groups. The Third World Women's
Alliance, for example, focused on combating counterrevolutionary institutions.

o Black women also organized around welfare rights, forming the National
Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO) to address poverty and link welfare to
women's work.

o During the second wave of feminism, Black women negotiated their activism
in what was perceived to be two movements (Black Revolution and Women's
liberation) but saw it as one struggle. They believed that while conditions and
tactics might differ, the ultimate goal of anti-humanism was the same.

Key Themes and Challenges:

● Intersectionality: Black feminism addresses the interlocking structures of race, class,

and gender oppression.

● White Feminism's Shortcomings: Black feminists critiqued White feminists for

"white solipsism," or imagining the world as if whiteness described it.

● Black Nationalism and Sexism: Black women often found themselves treated as
symbols rather than active participants in nationalist movements.

● Economic Realities: Black women's economic realities often differed from those of
White women, with many Black women needing to work outside the home.

● Continued Activism: Despite challenges, Black women have continued to shape

feminist theory and praxis, advocating for a humanistic community.

Correlation with Still I Rise

Black feminism's historical evolution in the U.S. is intertwined with Black women's
resistance against both racial and gender oppression, mirroring the spirit of resilience and
defiance found in Maya Angelou's "Still I Rise".

Core Tenets of Black Feminism

24 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 ● Self-Definition and Empowerment: Black feminist thought emphasizes Black
women creating their own positive self-images and resisting negative stereotypes.
This resonates with the speaker in "Still I Rise" who confidently asserts her worth and
refuses to be defined by others' hatefulness or attempts to diminish her.

● Intersectionality: Black feminism confronts the interconnectedness of race, class,

and gender oppression.

● Activism and Intellectual Thought: Black feminists intertwine intellectual analysis

with political activism.

● Cultural Heritage and Resistance: Black women draw strength from their cultural
heritage to resist daily discrimination. Like the speaker in "Still I Rise" who rises
from "history’s shame" and brings "the gifts that my ancestors gave," Black feminists
recognize and value their heritage as a source of resilience.

Historical Waves and Black Women's Activism

● First Wave: The first wave of feminism was connected to the abolitionist movement.

o Black women abolitionists developed a feminist consciousness reflecting their

unique experiences and the sexism they shared with White women.

o Figures like Sojourner Truth advocated for abolition and equal rights,
emphasizing the intersection of race and gender.

● Second Wave: The second wave was linked to the Civil Rights Movement.

o Black women participated in the movement while also confronting sexism

within it.

o Organizations like the Third World Women's Alliance and the National
Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO) addressed issues such as chauvinism,
poverty, and welfare rights.

Challenges and Tensions

● White Feminism's Limitations: Black feminists challenged the "white solipsism" of

mainstream feminism, which often ignored the experiences of Black women.

● Black Nationalism and Sexism: Black women sometimes faced marginalization

within Black nationalist movements, being treated as symbols rather than active
participants.

25 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 ● Economic Disparities: Black women's economic realities often differed from those
of White women, influencing their priorities and activism.

"Still I Rise" as a Reflection of Black Feminist Thought

● Resilience in the Face of Oppression: The poem embodies the spirit of resistance
against historical and ongoing oppression. The speaker's repeated assertion "Still I’ll
rise" mirrors Black women's determination to overcome adversity.

● Pride in Black Identity: The poem celebrates Black womanhood, aligning with
Black feminism's emphasis on positive self-definition and reclaiming Black women's
inherent beauty and strength.

● Confronting Hatefulness: The speaker defies those who seek to diminish her,
declaring, "You may shoot me with your words, / You may cut me with your eyes, /
You may kill me with your hatefulness, / But still, like air, I’ll rise". This reflects
Black feminism's commitment to confronting and dismantling systems of domination.

In essence, "Still I Rise" encapsulates the spirit of Black feminism: a refusal to be defined by
oppression, a celebration of Black identity, and an unwavering commitment to empowerment
and liberation.

IV. PHENOMENAL WOMEN BY MAYA ANGELOU

BACKGROUND

“Phenomenal Woman” is a poem that first appeared in Maya Angelou’s third poetry
collection, titled And Still I Rise (1978). The poem features a speaker who, despite not being
as thin as her society tells her she needs to be, nevertheless embodies her femininity with an
attractive self-confidence. The speaker’s allure baffles women who are more conventionally
pretty, and who want to know the source of her secret. Likewise, the men who feel drawn to
the speaker can’t fully explain the cause of their desire. They swarm around her like
honeybees in a hive, but they can’t decipher the mystery of her attractiveness. To account for
her feminine mystique, the speaker elaborates how the source of her allure lies not in
her physical appearance, but in the “phenomenal” way she embodies her sexuality. For
example, the secret to her attractiveness lies not in the physical appearance of her facial
features, but rather in “the fire in [her] eyes” (line 22), “the curl of [her] lips” (line 9), and
“the flash of [her] teeth” (23). The speaker explains this in a tone that is equally proud and

26 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
defiant, showing herself to be a feminist who advocates for the liberating potential of self-
acceptance.

CHARACTER SKETCH

THE POET

● Confidence and Self-Acceptance: The speaker knows "where my secret lies". She
acknowledges that she may not fit conventional beauty standards ("I’m not cute or
built to suit a fashion model’s size") but dismisses these notions by focusing on her
inner qualities and presence. The repetition of "I’m a woman / Phenomenally. /
Phenomenal woman, / That’s me" reinforces her unwavering self-assurance.

● Liberation of the Self: The speaker celebrates her physical attributes and personal
style ("It’s in the reach of my arms, / The span of my hips," "the grace of my style").
She seems to be free from the constraints of others' opinions, embracing her unique
qualities and expressing herself without inhibition. The lines "Now you understand /
Just why my head’s not bowed" suggest a refusal to be demeaned or diminished.

● Black Identity: While not explicitly stated, the poem is often interpreted within the
context of Black womanhood. The speaker's pride and confidence can be seen as a
reclamation of beauty and power in a society that has historically marginalized Black
women. The poem celebrates the strength, resilience, and inherent beauty of Black
women.

● Sense of Empowerment: The speaker possesses an inner "mystery" that others can't
grasp, which adds to her allure and power. She doesn't need to "shout or jump about /
Or have to talk real loud" to command attention and respect. Her presence alone is
enough to make people take notice and feel a sense of pride.

● Allure and Impact on Others: The speaker has a profound effect on those around
her, particularly men ("the fellows stand or / Fall down on their knees"). She is
compared to "A hive of honey bees". This suggests she is magnetic and desirable. Her
confidence and self-assuredness draw people to her.

THEMES

The Liberation of Self-Acceptance

27 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Throughout the poem, the speaker presents herself with an evident sense of pride, confidence,
and self-worth. Those around her wonder where her confidence comes from, particularly
considering that she doesn’t fit the conventional profile for female attractiveness. The speaker
herself acknowledges that she isn’t conventionally pretty: “I’m not cute or built to suit a
fashion model’s size” (line 2). Even so, she understands that physical beauty isn’t the only—
or even the primary—source of attractiveness. More important than a person’s physical form
alone is how a person inhabits their form. By liberating herself from socially imposed
perspectives on female beauty, the speaker feels less constrained and more playful in how she
carries herself. As she unleashes herself and allows herself to fully embody her femininity,
she notices the positive attention she gets from men and women alike. This attention creates a
feedback loop that she finds deeply empowering. Not only does it feel empowering to her
personally, but she also hopes to empower others. In the final stanza, she says:

Now you understand

Just why my head’s not bowed.

I don’t shout or jump about

Or have to talk real loud.

When you see me passed,

It ought to make you proud.

In other words (lines 46–51), the speaker’s self-acceptance endows her with a self-confidence
that she wants to make accessible to others as well.

The Power of Female Sexuality

The speaker of “Phenomenal Woman” exudes sexual energy in a way that proves equally
mysterious and powerful. She references this sexual energy most clearly in the poem’s
second stanza, where she describes how men can’t resist her:

I walk into a room

Just as cool as you please,

And to a man,

The fellows stand or

Fall down on their knees.

28 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Then they swarm around me,

A hive of honey bees.

In this passage (lines 14–20), the speaker likens men to a swarm of bees, buzzing around her
as if she were the queen of a honey hive. The metaphor of the honey hive has a strongly
sexual connotation. Indeed, honey often appears as a symbol for female sexuality, and
particularly for female genitalia. In this case, then, the male bees swarm around their queen in
a frenzy of irrepressible sexual energy. The speaker references this sexual energy elsewhere
in the poem, albeit more subtly. Specifically, the speaker locates the source of her sexual
allure in the way she embodies her femininity. It lies in “the span of [her] hips” (line 7) and
“the curl of [her] lips” (line 9), she says in stanza 1. Later, she locates the source in “the arch
of [her] back” (line 38) and “the ride of [her] breasts” (line 40). Through all these examples,
the speaker makes a case for the power of her sexuality.

The Difference Between Prettiness and Beauty

In the opening lines of “Phenomenal Woman,” the speaker draws a broad distinction between
shallowly conventional ideas of prettiness and a more deeply substantive notion of beauty.
The speaker makes this distinction implicitly when she says, in the first line, “Pretty women
wonder where my secret lies.” With these words, the speaker excludes herself from the
category of “pretty women,” and she confirms this conclusion in the following line: “I’m not
cute or built to suit a fashion model’s size.” These lines set up an opposition between
conventional prettiness and some other form of attractiveness, which has a “secret” source.
Conventional prettiness is defined solely by physical appearance. It’s precisely because the
speaker isn’t skinny like a fashion model that the “pretty women” feel baffled by her evident
allure. In contrast to the shallow convention of prettiness, the speaker emphasizes the way she
carries herself. She embodies her femininity in a uniquely animated way that draws the
attention of men and women alike. It is this deeper source of attractiveness that the speaker
celebrates throughout the poem. Though she uses the word “phenomenal” to describe her
embodiment of femininity, we could also refer to it as an authentic form of beauty that stands
in contrast to shallow ideas of prettiness.

Note: The motif used in the poem constantly is the word, phenomenal to showcase the two
meanings that the poet wants to convey. On the one hand, the word refers to the appearances
of things and to our perception of them. This is the word’s technical definition, which the
speaker references by insisting that folks who don’t understand the source of her allure need

29 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
only look at the way she carries herself. Her way of embodying femininity is an observable
phenomenon that others can perceive if only they open their eyes. On the other
hand, phenomenal can be used as a synonym for “remarkable” or “exceptional.” This is the
word’s more colloquial meaning, and it has a strong, celebratory connotation. The speaker
references this meaning of the word in the overall pride of her tone. She also references it in
her implication that, contrary to women who are merely “pretty” (line 1), she embodies
femininity in an exceptional, even ideal way.

SYMBOLS

“Pretty women”

The speaker of “Phenomenal Woman” distinguishes herself from a particular type of “pretty
women,” whose prettiness symbolizes what the broader society considers the ideal form of
femininity. The speaker makes this distinction in the poem’s opening lines (lines 1–4):

Pretty women wonder where my secret lies.

I’m not cute or built to suit a fashion model’s size

But when I start to tell them,

They think I’m telling lies.

In contrast to “pretty women,” the speaker doesn’t have the skinny body of a fashion model.
She therefore doesn’t fit the expectations for what society considers an attractive woman.
Even so, the speaker has an undeniable appeal. It’s precisely because the speaker is alluring
despite having a body that defies conventional prettiness that the “pretty women” want to
know her secret. As the speaker explains, however, these “pretty women” don’t believe her
when she says her secret lies in her behavior rather than her physical appearance. The fact
that the “pretty women” have a hard time understanding this alternative source of
attractiveness shows how indoctrinated they are into their society’s expectations for female
beauty. The speaker, by contrast, revels in her allure and the sense of power it brings. She
especially revels in the power she has over the “pretty women” who might otherwise look
down on her.

The Feminine Mystique

Twice in the poem the speaker references a certain secret and mysterious allure that draws the
attention of women and men alike. The first reference appears in the opening line, where the
speaker mentions that conventionally attractive women want to know the source of her
30 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
inexplicable attractiveness: “Pretty women wonder where my secret lies” (line 1). The second
reference comes later in the poem, after the speaker describes how men swarm around her.
These men feel just as baffled by the speaker’s attractiveness as the “pretty women” do (lines
30–34):

Men themselves have wondered

What they see in me.

They try so much

But they can’t touch

My inner mystery.

Neither the women nor the men seem to understand that the true source of the speaker’s
beauty lies not in her physical form, but in the way she animates that form. What the women
call her “secret” and what the men think of as her “inner mystery” are two ways of talking
about the speaker’s feminine mystique. This mystique isn’t just about attractiveness. It’s also
—and more deeply—symbolic of the power, strength, pride, and self-worth that the speaker
derives from her own way of embodying femininity.

STRUCTURE

“Phenomenal Woman” consists of four stanzas of unequal length. Though differing slightly
in the number of lines, each stanza has a similar internal structure, broken loosely into three
sections. The first section introduces some kind of question or problem related to the source
of the speaker’s mystique. The second section responds by locating the source in various
aspects of her body or comportment. The third section is identical for all four stanzas, each of
which ends with the same quatrain. As an example of how this stanza structure plays out,
consider the opening stanza. The first section of this stanza discusses how “pretty women”
have a hard time understanding where the speaker’s attractiveness comes from, given that she
isn’t thin like a fashion model. In the second section, the speaker describes how the secret of
her self-confidence lies in how she carries her body, rather than in just how her body looks
(lines 6–9):

It’s in the reach of my arms,

The span of my hips,

The stride of my step,

31 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
The curl of my lips.

The stanza then concludes with the repeating quatrain, in which the speaker conclusively
identifies herself as a “phenomenal woman.”

The internal structure of each stanza takes the form of a miniature argument. That is, in each
case the speaker sets up a problem, offers a solution to the problem, then concludes by
affirming a general truth that follows logically from her solution. Taken as a whole, the poem
has a very similar, argumentative structure. The first three stanzas each address distinct issues
related to the source of the speaker’s beauty and self-confidence. In the fourth stanza,
however, the speaker doesn’t introduce another issue. Instead, she uses language best suited
to the conclusion of an argument: “Now you understand / Just why my head’s not bowed”
(lines 46–47). The poem as a whole could therefore be outlined as follows:

Stanza 1: pretty women envy me,

Stanza 2: men swarm around me,

Stanza 3: men are baffled by my mystique,

Stanza 4: therefore, I don’t bow my head in insecurity.

Seen in this way, the entire poem follows the structure of an argument. The speaker
convinces us readers that the source of her mystique lies in her self-confident attitude.
Furthermore, because others react positively to her projection of self-confidence, there’s no
need to act insecure.

KEY POETIC DEVICES

Chiasmus

The term chiasmus (kee-YASS-muhs) derives from the Greek word for the letter X, and it
means “crossover.” In literature, chiasmus name a rhetorical figure in which two sequential
phrases or clauses share the same syntax but reverse the order of elements. Chiasmus can be
used to various effects, but it often functions as a special kind of emphasis. Since chiasmus
involves repetition, it creates emphasis simply through reiteration. However, the reversal of
terms involved in chiasmus also creates repetition with a difference. By emphasizing an
alternative arrangement of the terms involved, the use of chiasmus indicates the need to
consider a single issue or idea from multiple angles. In “Phenomenal Woman,” chiasmus
shows up in the quatrain that repeats at the end of every stanza (lines 10–13, 26–29, 42–45,
and 57–60):
32 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
I’m a woman

Phenomenally.

Phenomenal woman,

That’s me.

Each pair of lines in this quatrain communicates the same basic idea using the same basic
terms. However, the order of terms is reversed, which results in two different uses of the
same word, first as an adverb (i.e., “phenomenally”) and second as an adjective (i.e.,
“phenomenal”). Essentially, the speaker makes the same point twice, in two different ways,
fully driving home the point that she’s an ideal woman.

Refrain

In poetry, the term refrain refers to any word, phrase, line, or group of lines that gets
repeated over the course of a poem. The repeated material may appear with slight changes
each time it occurs, and it usually comes at the end of each stanza. This is precisely what
happens in “Phenomenal Woman,” where the speaker closes each of the poem’s four stanzas
with a quatrain that emphasizes her “phenomenal” embodiment of femininity. Refrains are
common in ballads as well as in songs, where the refrain is usually called a chorus. In these
forms, as in Angelou’s poem, the refrain serves the purpose of underscoring a major theme.
Repeating the main idea of the poem or song again and again makes the overall message
easier to grasp for the reader or listener. In the case of “Phenomenal Woman,” the refrain not
only underscores the speaker’s sense of pride and self-confidence, but it also more subtly
emphasizes the importance of self-acceptance. The speaker’s ultimate point is
that any woman, whether or not she is conventionally “pretty,” can be a phenomenal woman.

Asyndeton

The speaker of “Phenomenal Woman” uses asyndeton at several points in the poem. The
term asyndeton (ay-SIN-deh-tahn) is Greek for “unconnected,” and it refers to a technique
that involves the omission of conjunctions between words, clauses, or phrases. This kind of
omission has a shortening effect, and it conveys emphasis through concision. The speaker of
Angelou’s poem uses asyndeton in the part of each stanza where she lists the parts of herself
that exude her phenomenal womanhood. For instance, in response to the “pretty women” who
“wonder where [her] secret lies” (line 1), the speaker says:

It’s in the reach of my arms,

33 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
The span of my hips,

The stride of my step,

The curl of my lips.

In these lines (lines 6–9), the use of asyndeton lies in the omission of the word “and” before
the final line. In ordinary prose, a list like this would require a coordinating conjunction
before the final item in the list. Here, though, the speaker opts to avoid unnecessarily
lengthening the third line of the passage. This decision preserves the parallel structure of the
lines and conveys information more concisely.

Metaphor

In the poem’s second stanza, the speaker develops a metaphor that likens the men who are
attracted to her to honeybees. The speaker explains that many men desire her, and that they
follow her around, competing for her attention. She compares their actions to swarming bees:
“Then they swarm around me, / A hive of honey bees” (lines 19–20). The metaphor of the
honey hive has a strongly sexual connotation. Indeed, honey often appears as a symbol for
female sexuality, and particularly for female genitalia. Consider the related term, honeypot,
which in slang use can either be a pet name for a beloved or else a synonym for “vagina.” In
this case, then, the male bees swarm around their queen in a frenzy of irrepressible sexual
energy. Furthermore, if the men are honeybees, then according to the speaker’s own
metaphor, she is the queen bee, with command over the hive. In this regard, the metaphor
underscores more than just the speaker’s self-assured sexuality; it also discloses the sense of
power she enjoys holding over her male admirers.

V. JUST MERCY- MICHAEL B. JOHNSON

SUMMARY

In 1989, Harvard law graduate Bryan Stevenson travels to Alabama, intending to help defend
poor people who cannot afford proper legal representation. Teaming with Eva Ansley, he
forms the Equal Justice Initiative in the state capital, Montgomery. He embarks on trying to
combat social injustices in criminal law and practice, which have resulted in a high rate of
African Americans convicted and incarcerated in the state and nationwide.

34 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Stevenson goes to a state prison to meet inmates who are on death row and who are seeking
appeals of their convictions or sentences. Among these is Walter "Johnny D." McMillian, an
African-American man who was convicted of the 1986 murder of Ronda Morrison, an 18-
year-old white girl. McMillian has maintained his innocence.

When Stevenson reviews the evidence in the case, he learns that it hinges entirely on the
testimony of convicted felon Ralph Myers. The convict had provided highly contradictory
testimony to the prosecution in exchange for a plea deal and lighter sentence in his own
pending trial.

Given these issues, Stevenson appeals to the current prosecutor, Tommy Chapman, for aid;
he dismisses him without looking at his notes. Stevenson learns that, at the time of the
murder, McMillian's family friend Darnell Houston was elsewhere with a witness who had
subsequently falsely corroborated Myers' testimony. This evidence would cause the
prosecution's case to fall apart, so Stevenson asks Houston to testify to his account. When
Stevenson submits his testimony, police arrest Houston for perjury.

Although Stevenson gets the perjury charges dismissed, Houston is intimidated, so he refuses
to testify in court. Shortly afterward, Stevenson is threatened by two sheriff deputies, who
force him from his car at gunpoint and illegally search the car. They refuse to tell him why he
was pulled over, but release him.

During this period, Stevenson had a case on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of
another death row inmate, Herbert Lee Richardson; the court denied the appeal. Convicted of
killing his ex-girlfriend’s niece with a bomb on her porch, Richardson had been sentenced to
death by electric chair. Unable to get it overturned, Stevenson promises to be with
Richardson in his final moments and witnesses the execution.

On behalf of McMillian, Stevenson directly confronts Myers. He admits that police coerced
his testimony by threatening him with a death sentence. Stevenson appeals to the local court
to grant McMillian a retrial and successfully convinces Myers to recant his testimony on the
stand, but the judge refuses to grant it.

Stevenson appears on 60 Minutes to rally public support in favor of McMillian, and appeals
the court's decision to the Supreme Court of Alabama. The Supreme Court overturns the
circuit court's decision, and grants McMillian a retrial. Stevenson tries to have the charges
dismissed entirely. He confronts Chapman at home and tries to convince him to join in this
motion; Chapman forces him to leave.

35 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
On the day of the motion, Stevenson appeals to the judge. That day, Chapman joins him in
the motion, the judge dismisses the charges, and McMillian is finally released from prison
and reunited with his family.

An epilogue notes that Stevenson and Ansley continue their fight for justice. McMillian
remained friends with Stevenson until his natural death in 2013. A follow-up investigation
into Morrison's 1986 murder confirmed McMillian's innocence. Evidence suggested that a
white man was likely responsible, but the case has never been officially solved. McMillian's
former cellmate, Anthony Ray Hinton, remained on death row for 28 years. Stevenson
handled his defense and was eventually able to get all the charges dropped. Hinton was
released in 2015.

WHY IS THE MOVIE TITLED JUST MERCY?

The title Just Mercy embodies the tension between the concepts of justice and mercy. In the
context of Bryan Stevenson’s work, “Just” does not solely refer to fairness or legal
righteousness—it suggests a type of justice that is compassionate. The concept of “Just
Mercy” seeks to challenge a legal system that can often be mechanical, detached from the
people it affects, and devoid of human empathy.

PARALLEL MEANING OF “JUST” INDICATING “JUSTICE”

In Walter McMillian’s case, “justice” was not about mercy or leniency—it was about setting
the record straight, undoing an injustice. McMillian was seeking vindication for a crime he
did not commit, and the system failed to deliver this due to systemic racism and corruption.
For him, and many others like him, justice was an acknowledgement of their humanity and
innocence. The film, and Stevenson’s advocacy, show that justice for the wrongfully
convicted isn’t just a personal victory but a societal responsibility. Injustice harms not only
the individuals but also the moral fabric of the society.

IS MERCY AS UNIVERSAL AS JUSTICE?

Stevenson raises an important philosophical question—whether mercy is as universal a

principle as justice. Justice is often seen as a public obligation, a moral and legal necessity.
Mercy, on the other hand, can feel more like a personal favour or privilege, something that
may or may not be extended. Stevenson argues that mercy should not be an exception but a
core principle.

36 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
His belief that “people are more than their crimes” emphasizes that justice, in its fullest sense,
should not merely punish wrongdoing but also account for human complexity, redemption,
and the ability to change. Mercy complicates the rigid application of law, but it reminds us of
the importance of recognizing the dignity of all individuals, even those who have done
wrong.

However, the institutionalization of mercy can be challenging. Mercy is often granted by an

authority figure (like a judge or governor) who has not been directly affected by the crime.
This detachment makes it difficult to balance mercy with justice in a way that feels just to
both the victim and the perpetrator.

IS THERE ROOM FOR MERCY IN A JUST SOCIETY?

The example of R. v. Dudley and Stephens illustrates a conflict between justice and mercy.
The court, upholding the law, found that the men had committed murder, but mercy was
extended in the form of a reduced sentence. This case shows that while justice demands
accountability, mercy can provide flexibility in extraordinary situations. Mercy does not
negate justice but acknowledges human frailty and offers a path to leniency when
appropriate.

In Just Mercy, the idea is that a just society should incorporate mercy because justice without
compassion becomes oppressive. Stevenson’s fight for his clients, many of whom were
harshly sentenced or wrongfully convicted, underscores that mercy is not just an individual
act but a societal good. Courts, while focused on law, often fail to administer mercy—
something that people, as flawed beings, may need to heal and move forward.

R v Dudley and Stephens (1884) is a pivotal English legal case that delves into the complex
relationship between morality and the law, particularly concerning homicide. The case
emerged from a dire situation involving four sailors stranded at sea after their yacht,
Mignonette, sank. After several days adrift without food or water, Thomas Dudley and Edwin
Stephens made the harrowing decision to kill and eat Richard Parker, a cabin boy who was
weak and near death from starvation. Once rescued four days later, Dudley and Stephens
were charged with murder, prompting them to argue that their actions were necessary for
survival.

The court ultimately ruled against them, establishing a critical legal precedent that necessity
cannot justify murder. The judges emphasized the principle that taking an innocent life,
regardless of the circumstances, is indefensible under the law. Although Dudley and Stephens

37 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
were initially sentenced to death, public sentiment regarding the extreme nature of their
situation led to their sentences being commuted to six months in prison. This case highlighted
the moral complexities involved in extreme circumstances and reinforced the legal principle
that human life must be protected, even in desperate situations where survival instincts are at
play.

ARE COURTS A MEDIUM FOR MERCY

Courts are designed to enforce the law, uphold justice, and ensure fairness. Their primary
function is to determine guilt or innocence, and when appropriate, to impose punishment.
However, because courts are structured around the application of legal principles and
precedents, they may not always be well-suited to dispense mercy, which is often seen as a
more personal, discretionary act.

0. Why Courts Focus on Justice, Not Mercy

1. The Nature of the Legal System: Courts operate under the principle of objectivity.
Their role is to interpret and apply the law consistently across cases, ensuring that all
individuals are treated equally. This commitment to impartiality is foundational to the
legal system’s credibility. Mercy, by its nature, is subjective and individualized,
which can conflict with the court's responsibility to maintain fairness and uniformity.
If courts applied mercy inconsistently, it could undermine public trust in the legal
system.

2. Justice as Retributive: The legal system is often focused on retributive justice—

ensuring that those who commit crimes are held accountable. Retribution aims to right
a wrong by punishing the offender, ensuring that the punishment is proportional to the
crime. Mercy, on the other hand, softens this approach by offering leniency or
forgiveness, which could be perceived as undermining the retributive goals of justice.
This is why courts, as instruments of justice, may struggle to incorporate mercy
without compromising the perceived fairness of the system.

3. Mercy as a Privilege, Not a Right: Mercy is typically seen as something that is

granted, not something that is owed or expected. In the legal context, it is usually at
the discretion of judges, juries, or, in the case of executive clemency, government
officials. Because it is not a legal obligation, but a discretionary act, mercy can seem
out of place in a courtroom, where the focus is on enforcing laws rather than granting
exceptions.

38 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
In contrast, justice is a universal concept that everyone has a right to demand. It is something
that must be delivered without bias or favouritism. The discretionary nature of mercy raises
concerns about fairness and equality—if mercy is granted to one individual but not another,
the justice system might be perceived as arbitrary or biased.

b. The Institutionalization of Mercy: Clemency and Pardons

Mercy does have a place in the broader justice system, but often outside the courts through
mechanisms like executive clemency and pardons. These tools allow for mercy to be
exercised after the legal process has run its course, often in cases where the punishment may
be legally justified but morally or ethically troubling.

1. Clemency and Pardons: Executive clemency, which can include pardons and
commutations of sentences, is one-way mercy can be institutionalized. This power is
typically vested in government officials like presidents or governors. Clemency is
often used to correct potential miscarriages of justice, show leniency in cases of undue
harshness, or take into account new evidence that changes the moral or factual basis
of a case. It reflects the idea that while courts enforce justice, there are situations
where mercy should be shown outside the rigid framework of legal proceedings.

2. Sentencing Flexibility: In some legal systems, judges are granted discretion in

sentencing, which allows them to incorporate mitigating factors (such as the
defendant’s background, mental health, or circumstances surrounding the crime).
However, even in these cases, the focus is not purely on mercy but on delivering a fair
and just sentence, according to the law. This shows that while courts can consider
individual circumstances, their primary responsibility is to balance fairness with the
legal expectations of punishment.

c. Courts and the Dilemma of Mercy

1. Balancing Justice and Mercy: Courts face a delicate balance between upholding the
rule of law and recognizing the humanity of the people they judge. If courts were to
act as arbiters of mercy, they might risk undermining the principle of equality before
the law. For example, showing mercy to one defendant but not another, even if their
crimes are similar, could erode public confidence in the impartiality of the courts.
This is why courts are often hesitant to act as vehicles for mercy—they must prioritize
justice, which is seen as a public good.

39 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 2. The Role of Victims in the Justice Process: Mercy can be problematic in the court
system because it does not account for the harm done to victims. The criminal justice
system is designed to hold offenders accountable not just for their actions but also to
provide a sense of justice to the victims. In some cases, granting mercy might be
perceived as neglecting the needs or rights of the victim. This is why courts, when
administering justice, are often more focused on balancing the scales between the
harm done and the appropriate punishment, rather than prioritizing mercy.

d. Mercy as a Societal, Not Legal, Value

Bryan Stevenson, through his advocacy, argues that mercy should be a value that is reflected
in society and in the way we think about criminal justice. However, the court system may not
be the ideal vehicle for implementing that value in every case. Instead, mercy may be better
implemented in broader social policies that address the root causes of crime, such as poverty,
lack of education, and systemic inequality.

Stevenson’s work suggests that while the courts are necessary for upholding justice, they
cannot and should not be the only way society seeks to respond to wrongdoing. Mercy must
also be woven into how we think about rehabilitation, second chances, and the potential for
people to change.

CHARACTER OF BRYAN STEVENSON

Bryan Stevenson’s character in Just Mercy is the embodiment of his advocacy for justice and
mercy. His unyielding belief in the humanity of his clients, his willingness to fight against a
deeply flawed system, and his calm resilience in the face of adversity all reflect his deep
commitment to showing mercy.

MOMENTS HIGHLIGHTING HIS DEDICATION TO MERCY

1. Walter McMillian’s Case: One of the most powerful moments in the movie is when
Stevenson first meets Walter McMillian and listens to his story. Stevenson doesn’t see
him as a convicted murderer but as a human being who has been wronged by the
system. He empathizes with McMillian’s pain and despair, which motivates him to
pursue justice with relentless passion.

2. Stevenson’s Challenges: As an African-American lawyer in the Deep South,

Stevenson faces numerous obstacles, including racial profiling, discrimination, and

40 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 threats. The scene where he is strip-searched before visiting his client highlights the
systemic racism he faces. Despite these humiliating experiences, Stevenson remains
focused on his work, never letting his mistreatment cloud his dedication to the cause
of justice.

3. Resilience in the Face of Threats: Stevenson and his friend Eva Ansley receive
bomb threats, underscoring the danger they face in challenging the status quo. These
moments emphasize not only Stevenson’s bravery but also his firm belief that change
can only happen when someone is willing to confront injustice head-on, even at great
personal risk.

4. The Execution Scene: The scene where Stevenson witnesses the execution of another
inmate, Herbert Richardson, is one of the most heart-wrenching moments in the film.
Stevenson’s visible emotional response to the event underscores his belief in the
sanctity of life, even for those who have made serious mistakes. It reinforces his core
message that justice should not be solely about retribution but should also leave room
for mercy and redemption.

DEATH PENALTY IN “JUST MERCY”

ARGUMENTS IN FAVOUR OF THE DEATH PENALTY

1. Deterrence: Capital punishment is often justified with the argument that by executing
convicted murderers, we will deter would-be murderers from killing people.

2. Retribution: One of the key principles of retribution is that people should get what
they deserve in proportion to the severity of their crime.

● This argument states that real justice requires people to suffer for their
wrongdoing and to suffer in a way appropriate for the crime.

● Each criminal should get what their crime deserves and in the case of murder,
the criminal deserves death.

ARGUMENTS AGAINST DEATH PENALTY

ARBITRARY AND INCONSISTENT APPLICATION OF SENTENCING STANDARDS

Trial courts often apply the death penalty inconsistently, disregarding the guidelines
established by the Supreme Court in Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980). This case laid

41 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
out a framework requiring courts to weigh aggravating and mitigating factors and ensure
that life imprisonment is not an option before imposing the death penalty. However, trial
courts frequently overlook this framework.

In the case Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, having previously been convicted for the murder
of his wife under Section 302 of the IPC, Bachan Singh served 14 years in prison. After his
release, he resided with his cousin, Hukum Singh, and his family. However, this living
arrangement was objected to by the wife and children of his cousin. On July 4, 1977, the
appellant committed an atrocious act by murdering three out of four children of his cousin
using an axe. Petitioner argued No social purpose is served by the death penalty, and it does
not fall under the purview of unreasonable restriction. The Court stated that the provision of
the death sentence is only an alternative to other punishments prescribed for murder under
Section 302 of the IPC, 1860, and cannot be considered unreasonable and not in the public
interest. The Court did not hold the sentence of the death penalty as unconstitutional but
established the doctrine of the ‘rarest of the rare’

Appellate courts confirmed only 4.9% of death sentences were handed down by trial
courts, while 29.8% of those sentenced to death were acquitted of all charges, and
65.3% had their sentences commuted to life imprisonment.

FOCUS ON THE NATURE OF THE CRIME RATHER THAN THE OFFENDER

Trial courts focus on the brutality of the crime (aggravating circumstances) while
neglecting the individual circumstances of the offender (mitigating factors). This practice
is antithetical to the principle of individualised sentencing enshrined in Bachan Singh.

Trial courts often dismiss mitigating factors such as age, socio-economic background, and the
possibility of reformation, which are essential to the Bachan Singh framework. The trial
courts in Madhya Pradesh, for example, failed to consider any mitigating circumstances in
over 62% of cases.

A. Over-reliance on Aggravating Circumstances

Many trial courts base their death penalty decisions solely on the aggravating factors of the
crime without considering the personal circumstances of the offender. This practice departs
from the balance required under Bachan Singh and instead shifts the framework toward
crime-centric reasoning.

B. Remorse as an Aggravating Factor

42 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
A peculiar practice noted in the report is that trial courts sometimes treat the absence of
remorse as an aggravating factor, even though it is not a legally recognized justification
for imposing the death penalty.

Example: In State of Maharashtra v. Sadashiv Jetappa Kamble, the court used the lack of
remorse as a reason to impose the death penalty, without considering other mitigating
circumstances.

PROCEDURAL FLAWS: SAME-DAY SENTENCING

A concerning trend observed is same-day sentencing, where the conviction and sentencing
hearings occur on the same day. This practice violates the principles of fair trial and due
process as it prevents the defence from presenting comprehensive arguments on sentencing,
especially mitigating circumstances. 44% of the cases between 2000-2015 studied involved
same-day sentencing, indicating a systemic failure to properly consider sentencing.

USE OF “COLLECTIVE CONSCIENCE”

There are critiques of the reliance on the concept of “collective conscience,” introduced in
Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab (1983), which calls for the death penalty in cases where the
community's conscience is “outraged.” This introduces a populist element into the legal
system, making sentencing decisions based on public opinion rather than legal principles.

In the Macchi Singh v. State of Punjab (1983) case, Macchi Singh and his co-accused were
convicted of the brutal murders of a woman and her two children, which occurred amid the
communal strife and violence that plagued Punjab during that period. The trial court
sentenced them to death, categorizing their actions as particularly heinous. The Supreme
Court upheld the death sentence, emphasizing several critical factors that justified capital
punishment in this case. The court noted the extreme brutality of the crime, the premeditated
nature of the murders, and the devastating impact on the victims' family and community.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court reinforced the "rarest of rare" doctrine, which stipulates
that the death penalty should only be imposed in cases where the crime is exceptionally grave
and poses a significant threat to society. The court considered factors such as how the
murders were committed, the psychological trauma inflicted on the surviving family
members, and the broader implications for societal safety and order. By focusing on these
elements, the judgment aimed to establish a clearer framework for applying the death penalty,
highlighting that while capital punishment is a severe measure, it remains justified in cases
that evoke outrage and demand a strong societal response. The Macchi Singh case thus
43 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
contributed to the ongoing legal and ethical discourse surrounding capital punishment in
India.

FAILURE TO CONSIDER REFORMATION

The Bachan Singh framework requires that the court consider whether the offender can be
reformed before imposing the death penalty. However, trial courts frequently fail to
evaluate the possibility of reformation, or base their judgments on the nature of the crime
rather than the offender's potential for rehabilitation. In most cases, trial courts do not assess
the probability of reform. When it is considered, it is often backwards-looking, focusing on
the crime rather than the offender's circumstances.

CONSEQUENCES ON BEING ON DEATH ROW FOR A LONG TIME

Stevenson often refers to the “collateral consequences” of the penal system: McMillian not
only lost years of his life from his false conviction, but he also lost his reputation, his mental
and physical health, his business, and his family’s limited financial resources.

The concept of “collateral consequences” captures the far-reaching impact of being on death
row, as exemplified by Walter McMillian’s experience. Beyond the immediate loss of
freedom, McMillian endured significant repercussions that altered the course of his life. His
wrongful conviction led to the loss of over six years—years that could have been spent with
family, pursuing his business, or engaging with his community. The mental toll of living
under the constant threat of execution resulted in severe psychological distress, including
anxiety and depression. Furthermore, the harsh conditions of incarceration contributed to the
deterioration of his physical health, exacerbating any pre-existing conditions and leading to
chronic stress.

The fallout from his wrongful conviction extended to his family, which faced social stigma
and financial strain. McMillian’s reputation, once that of a respected community member,
was irrevocably damaged, casting a long shadow over his life and that of his loved ones. His
family suffered economically as their resources dwindled, and the emotional trauma took a
lasting toll on their relationships. The cumulative effects of McMillian’s wrongful
incarceration illustrate the profound injustices perpetuated by a flawed penal system,
underscoring the urgent need for reform and a compassionate approach to those affected by
the criminal justice system.

44 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
MEDIA AND PUBLIC OPINION

Sensationalist media coverage operates in several parts of Just Mercy to shape popular
opinion around criminal justice issues and individual cases, which influences the actions of
law enforcement, judges, and juries. For example, Stevenson demonstrates how the local
news in the communities around Monroeville declared, even before his trial, that Walter
was guilty of murdering Ronda Morrison. This coverage influenced the jury, leading to an
incorrect guilty verdict and a death penalty sentence. Through this and other individual cases,
Stevenson demonstrates how coverage of criminal investigations and proceedings can have a
severe impact on the fate of the accused.

At the same time, Stevenson also shows how the media can advance the cause of justice by
making the public aware of political corruption, unfair or inhumane treatment, and
miscarriages of justice. Stevenson describes how he and the EJI reached out to national
media sources during Walter’s retrial to publicize the political corruption and illegal state
actions surrounding his conviction and sentencing. After 60 Minutes and other influential
national media outlets aired Walter’s story, state officials were forced to finally pay
attention to EJI’s petitions on behalf of Walter because the state feared the effects of
negative national publicity. By describing this and other instances of media sources
revealing injustices, Stevenson conveys the role of the media in holding law enforcement and
public officials accountable for their actions.

VI. SIRF EK BANDA KAAFIHAI: BASED ON ASARAM BAPU CASE, PLEADER FOR

PETITIONER: PC SOLANKI, PLEADER FOR DEFENDANT: RAM JETHMALANI,

SALMAN KHURSHEED, SUBRAMANIAM SWAMY AMONG OTHERS

SHORT SUMMARY

The story unfolds in the heart of Delhi, where a brave young girl (Adrija Sinha) steps forward
to accuse a highly influential godman, referred to as ‘Baba’, of sexual abuse.

P.C. Solanki, despite being a small-time lawyer, accepts the daunting task of representing the
girl in court, fully aware of the serious dangers and challenges he will face. The girl’s parents
hire him after their previous lawyer is exposed trying to take a bribe from Baba’s allies.
Solanki faces bribery, witness intimidation, and even murder. But he never gives up. He
fights for the girl and eventually wins her case.

How he wins the case against the odds, is what makes it interesting.

45 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Outside the courtroom, Solanki, a devout Shiva worshipper, provides emotional and moral
support to the victim, reinforcing her faith in justice. His firm belief in righteousness and
his dedication to his profession helps him combat the threats that come his way.

P.C Solanki is a well-written character, you will understand that from the beginning itself.

The film “Sirf Ek BandaaKaafi Hai” showcases the tenacity of the common man and salutes
the resilience of survivors of sexual abuse.

MADHULIKA’S NOTES

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF POCSO

Initially, children were considered objects of protection, instead of holders of rights. In

1990, After decades of discussions and deliberations, the United Nations Convention on the
Rights of the Child (CRC) was adopted. CRC was a landmark step as it offered a legally
binding instrument that recognised children’s rights.

Among other provisions, CRC recognised state parties’ obligation to protect children from all
forms of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation. To this end, Articles 19 and 34 of CRC
mandated comprehensive state action and international collaboration to prevent child sexual
abuse and exploitation. Later in 2000, the Optional Protocol to the CRC on the sale of
children, child prostitution and child pornography was adopted.

A) DEVELOPMENT OF A FRAMEWORK AGAINST CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE IN INDIA

Cognisant of the importance of children in our society, the Constitution of India has
incorporated several provisions to further their rights and eliminate all forms of exploitation.
Chapter III of the Constitution, dedicated to Fundamental Rights, includes provisions to
allow special measures for children, overarching the right to equality. The Chapter also
includes dedicated Articles to prohibit the trafficking of humans and the employment of
children in factories. The Constitution has further directed the government to endeavour to
provide early childhood care and improve public health.

Pursuant to this objective, India has also been a signatory to landmark international
instruments on child rights and against child sexual abuse, such as the Convention on the
Rights of the Child (CRC – date of accession – 11 December 1992), Optional Protocol to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child
Pornography (CRC-OP-SC), and the SAARC Convention on Prevention and Combating
Trafficking in Women and Children for Prostitution (signed by India on 5 January 2002).

46 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
However, despite these strong constitutional and international law frameworks towards
strengthening child rights, India lacked any dedicated provision against child sexual abuse till
2012.

1. State of Punjab v Major Singh, 1966

In State of Punjab v Major Singh, while addressing the appeal in a child sexual assault case
where the accused was charged with section 354 of IPC, assault with the intent to outrage her
modesty, the High Court of Punjab acquitted the accused holding that a girl of seven
and a half months does not possess womanly modesty, and therefore, the provision does
not apply to the case. The Supreme Court later reversed this decision.

The case involves Major Singh, the respondent, who caused severe injuries to the private
parts of a seven-and-a-half-month-old female child by inserting his fingers into her
vagina. The child's mother entered the room, causing Major Singh to flee. He was initially
convicted by the trial court under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for causing
grievous hurt and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment and a fine. The court
held that the child was too young to understand modesty, so the offence could not fall under
Section 354 (outraging a woman's modesty).

Modesty is an inherent attribute of being female, and even infants possess it. The focus is
on the offender's actions and whether they are likely to outrage modesty, not on whether
the victim can comprehend it. The act of interfering with the child’s vagina showed intent
to outrage her modesty.

Justice Sarkar agreed with the Punjab High Court that modesty varies from person to
person and is subjective. A reasonable person would not consider a seven-and-a-half-
month-old baby capable of possessing modesty. Therefore, Major Singh could not have
intended to outrage her modesty, as the child was too young to understand the concept.

0. 42nd Law Commission Report on Indian Penal Code, 1971

The report suggested the inclusion of a dedicated provision to penalise the offence of
sexual abuse of children of all ages and sex. However, the report refrained from
recommending the inclusion of the offence of sexual assault on a boy and stated that ‘such
acts on men are socially not so evil as to merit a penal provision.’

0. 156th Law Commission Report on Indian Penal Code, 1997

47 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
In 1997, the 156th report of the Law Commission recognised these obligations under
the CRC to protect children from sexual exploitation and abuse. However, the report opined
that the existing provisions against sexual offences, i.e. offences of ‘rape’, ‘assault against
women with intent to outrage their modesty’, and ‘unnatural offences’ were sufficient to
address this issue and suggested a minor increase in the punishments under these
provisions. The report further suggested that provisions related to the offence of hurt and use
of criminal force, be applied to address the instances of sexual abuse against boys.

0. 172nd Law Commission Report on Review of Rape Laws, 2000

The insertion of the offence of unlawful sexual contact which penalised touching any part of
the body of an adolescent with sexual intent and inciting, with sexual intent, adolescent
persons to touch any part of the body of any person was to be made a separate offence
under the IPC. While the Law Commission focused on strengthening and widening the
existing provisions to address the offence of child sexual abuse, parallel efforts were being
made to strengthen the framework for child rights in India through dedicated legislation to
penalise such offences.

B) NEED FOR DEDICATED LEGISLATION FOR OFFENCES AGAINST CHILDREN

In the 1990s, the revelation of a child sexual abuse racket in a major tourist hub of India,
Goa, shocked the public conscience and brought forth concern regarding sexual abuse and
exploitation of children. Concerned with such instances, in 2003, the state government of
Goa enacted the Goa Children’s Act to promote child rights and children’s
development in the state.

Parallelly, in 2000, the Special Expert Committee formed under the chairpersonship of
Justice VR Krishna Iyer and facilitated by the India office of UNICEF presented a draft
code for child rights in India, Children’s Code Bill, 2000. The draft aimed to incorporate
the spirit of CRC into the Indian legislative framework. These two initiatives established the
basis for dedicated legislation against child sexual abuse.

In 2005, the Department of Women and Child Development, in consultation with civil
society organisations, prepared the Draft Offences against Children (Protection) Bill, 2005
to address different offences targeted against children, including sexual offences. During
discussions over this Bill, while some civil society organisations suggested incorporating
these provisions under IPC, the Ministry of Home Affairs suggested that there should be
48 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
separate comprehensive legislation against child abuse. This viewpoint was further
strengthened by the Study of Child Abuse, 2007 report published by the Ministry of
Women and Child Development which helped the governments in identifying the gravity of
this concern.

The Study of Child Abuse covered 13 states with a sample size of 12447 children, 2324
young adults and 2449 stakeholders. It looked at different forms of child abuse: Physical
Abuse, Sexual Abuse and Emotional Abuse and Girl Child Neglect in five different
evidence groups, namely, children in a family environment, children in school, children at
work, children on the street and children in institutions. The study found that 50.76 per cent
of children surveyed reported having faced one or more forms of sexual abuse. Contrary
to the general perception, the overall percentage of boys reporting experiencing sexual
abuse was much higher than that of girls. This study prompted the government to start
taking steps toward creating a sound legal framework to address sexual abuse and sexual
exploitation of children.

C) ENACTMENT OF THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012

In January 2010, during the discussions on the Offences against Children (Protection) Bill
within the Union Government, an opinion emerged that instead of general legislation
addressing different forms of abuse, the Bill should focus on the issue of sexual abuse
and exploitation of children. Further, it was discussed that other statutes, such as the IPC
and the Indian Evidence Act, should be parallelly amended to prevent secondary
victimisation and ensure speedy justice to children.

As a result of these discussions, in September 2010, the Ministry of Women and Child
Development, along with other ministries prepared a draft Protection of Children from
Sexual Offences Bill, 2010. After several rounds of revisions and discussions, the Protection
of Children from Sexual Offences Bill was presented in Rajya Sabha on 23 March 2011.

This was followed by a series of deliberations in the Parliamentary Standing Committee and
the discussions in both houses of the Parliament. Ultimately, on 22 May 2012, the POCSO
Act was passed in the Parliament and came into force on Children’s Day, 14 November 2012.
The Act created a dedicated framework to penalise sexual harassment and sexual abuse of
children and provided specific sections to guide different aspects of criminal trial including
recording of statements and medical examinations in cases of child sexual abuse.

49 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
C) THE MOVEMENT TOWARDS STRINGENT PUNISHMENTS UNDER THE POCSO, 2012

The POCSO Act was amended in 2013 and 2018. More recently, in 2019, concerned with
rising cases of sexual offences against children and in response to coming to light of certain
heinous sexual crimes committed against children, the Ministry of Women and Child
Development introduced an amendment to the Act to deter offenders and ensure safety for
children. The amendment increased the minimum punishment for penetrative sexual
assault from seven years imprisonment to ten years and aggravated penetrative sexual
assault from ten years imprisonment to twenty years. It has also introduced the
punishment of the death penalty for the offence of aggravated penetrative sexual
assault. In addition to these changes, the Amendment Act has also introduced offences for
transmitting or propagating pornographic materials involving a child and failing to
destroy or report such pornographic materials.

D) PLACING RELIANCE ON THE SOLE TESTIMONY OF THE VICTIM TO CONVICT

Like other sexual crimes, in POCSO cases too, the possibility of having eyewitnesses is
extremely rare. Usually, the child victim is also the sole witness to the crime. In such cases,
an important issue that arises is whether courts can rely on the sole testimony of the child
victim in order to convict the accused. Since victims in POCSO cases can be very young
children, and since evidence is often recorded after a considerable lapse of time, there can be
minor inconsistencies in the statements of the victims. Therefore, courts have to carefully
balance the victim’s right to justice with the accused’s right to a fair trial.

When the question of whether reliance can be placed on the sole testimony of a child victim
came before the Apex Court, it held that considering the object and purpose of the POCSO
Act, when the evidence of the prosecutrix is reliable and trustworthy, the conviction will
stand, even though another prosecution witness has turned hostile.

In the case of Ganesan v State, the accused had been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of
three years and fined Rs. 1 lakh under section 8 of the POCSO Act by the trial court. The
High Court upheld the conviction but modified the order of compensation. The accused
appealed to the Supreme Court and one of the grounds of appeal was that the mother of the
victim (a prosecution witness) had turned hostile and the conviction was based on the sole
testimony of the victim. The Supreme Court rejected the appeal.

50 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Despite the Supreme Court’s decision, in cases where the child victim is extremely young,
courts have displayed more caution while relying on their testimony. In the case, Janardan
Pandurang Kapse v State of Maharashtra, involving a child victim aged five years, the
Bombay High Court remarked that a child witness is amenable to tutoring and inducement
and is often prone to telling imaginative and exaggerated stories. According to the court,
child witnesses, because of their tender age, are pliable witnesses and hence their evidence
needs to be scrutinised with extreme care and caution.

A different approach was adopted by the Madras High Court in a case involving an 11-year-
old child victim. The defence had argued that no independent witness had been examined by
the trial court to corroborate the evidence of the child victim. However, the High Court
acknowledged that the nature of the case was such that one could not expect an eye
witness or independent witness. The court found no reason to disbelieve the cogent,
consistent and trustworthy evidence of the sole witness.

In another case where there were some inconsistencies in the statements made by the victim,
the Calcutta High Court held that the victim is the best judge of the incident and even if
there are minor discrepancies in the evidence of the victim, such discrepancies cannot
be held to be material contradictions that affect the credibility of the witness.

THE STRATEGY OF BAIL WAS AN ESCAPE ROUTE.

WHAT IS BAIL

CrPC only defined what a bailable offence was but did not give the exact definition for bail.
However, according to Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) Section 2 (b) “bail”
means the “release of a person accused of or suspected of commission of an offence from the
custody of law upon certain conditions imposed by an officer or Court on execution by such
person of a bond or a bail bond”

A. EVEN WHEN BAIL IS THE RULE AND JAIL IS THE EXCEPTION, WHY WAS

ASARAM DENIED BAIL

SERIOUSNESS OF THE CRIME

51 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
The charges against Asaram involved the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences
(POCSO) Act, the Juvenile Justice Act, and sections of the Indian Penal Code related to
rape, criminal intimidation, and conspiracy. Since the sexual assault on a minor is a grave
offence, courts are generally reluctant to grant bail in such cases, as the punishment can be
severe. The heinous nature of the allegations added to the weight of the case, making it less
likely for bail to be considered.

B. WHY IS IT DIFFICULT TO GET BAIL UNDER POCSO

The Delhi High Court noted that while considering matters involving sexual offences, a Court
has to be mindful that the incidents of sexual violence against children in a society always
involve the life and limb of a child as what is at stake is the prestige and future of the
victim which has been lowered and shattered into pieces. Once a victim being a child has
been hurt physically, emotionally, and mentally at a tender age, the same is bound to
have adverse effects on the overall growth and development of the said human being. It is
thus in the interest of justice and of course the overall interest of society at large that
proceedings are handled with due care and precaution, especially when the Court is
dealing with an application for releasing the accused on bail.

The Court opined that while dealing with cases arising out of the POCSO Act, a Court is
called upon to balance the “public cause” of the society at large against the “private
interest/right”. Therefore, in cases of grant of bail, it is required to take into consideration
various factors primarily including the nature of the offence, the heinousness of the crime, the
punishment involved, and the role of the accused. The Court is also required to examine if
there is a prima facie case made out against the accused or if there is a reasonable doubt
created in the mind of the Court for granting bail to the accused.

Placing reliance on Deepak Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh, the Court noted the
considerations for a Court while granting bail to an accused that are as follows:

1. whether there is any prima facie or reasonable ground to believe that the accused had
committed the offence;

2. nature and gravity of the accusation;

3. severity of the punishment in the event of conviction;

4. danger of the accused absconding or fleeing if released on bail;

52 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 5. character, behaviour, means, position and standing of the accused in society;

6. likelihood of the offence being repeated;

7. reasonable apprehension of the witnesses being influenced;

8. and danger, of course, of justice being thwarted by the grant of bail.

The Court laid down the following considerations in addition to the aforesaid
considerations that should be kept in mind while considering the grant of bail to an accused in
matters relating to sexual offences, especially the POCSO Act:

1. Age of the Victim;

2. Age difference between the victim and the accused;

3. Ferociousness of the offence;

4. Relationship between the victim and the accused and;

5. Vicinity of residence of the accused and the victim and if they are in proximity then if
the accused is willing to reside elsewhere, till the pendency of trial.

RISK OF WITNESS INTIMIDATION

One of the primary concerns raised by the prosecution was the intimidation and threat to
witnesses. Several witnesses in the case had already faced harassment, and some had even
been murdered during the trial period. The influence that Asaram wielded over his large
number of followers heightened the court’s concern that granting him bail could lead to
further witness tampering or intimidation, jeopardizing the trial's fairness. The fear that the
accused could use his position of power to manipulate or threaten key witnesses was a
significant factor in denying bail. Over the five years of the trial, nine witnesses were
attacked - three of whom died even without the accused being in Jail the whole time.

A similar risk has been seen in the case of Hathras case once the bail was granted to the
accused there was intimidation of the witness by the accused and his family and even the
police, and members of the dead victim’s family were killed or previously injured.

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023 in section 398 mandates that state
governments create and notify a Witness Protection Scheme to protect witnesses from threats,
intimidation, and harm. The Witness Protection Scheme, 2018, provides protective measures

53 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
like shielding witnesses from the accused, protecting or changing their identity, and
relocating them based on threat perception. It categorizes threats into three levels: life threats
(Category A), safety/reputation/property threats (Category B), and moderate harassment
threats (Category C). However, the scheme faces significant issues, including a limited
protection timeframe, potential for corruption in threat assessment by police, lack of penalties
for identity breaches, inadequate resources, and infrastructure in courts, and the social
pressures witnesses often face in India. It also does not address issues like frequent court
adjournments and witnesses turning hostile due to political influence or social dynamics,
making it less effective in instilling confidence or ensuring witness safety comprehensively.

THREAT TO PUBLIC ORDER

Asaram had a massive following, and his arrest had already sparked protests and unrest
among his devotees. Granting bail to such a high-profile figure could have led to large-scale
public disturbances, which the court would have taken into account. The court may have
considered the potential for law and order problems if Asaram was released on bail, as his
followers could mobilize in ways that could disrupt peace and stability.

FLIGHT RISK

In the case of Asaram Bapu, the court was particularly cautious due to his immense
resources, large number of followers, and influence over law enforcement and political
figures. Given his ability to mobilize supporters and the financial capacity to potentially
escape the country, granting bail could have opened up a real possibility that he would flee,
effectively stalling or ending the judicial process. The courts likely reflected on past
instances where wealthy or influential figures have fled while on bail and determined that
Asaram's network posed a similar risk. If he were to abscond, the victim’s pursuit of justice
would be indefinitely delayed or derailed, as extradition processes for such influential figures
can be long and complex.

We have seen similar cases like that of Vijay Mallya where once he was granted bail he fled
the country and it has been difficult and somewhat near impossible to extradite him from the
UK and bring him to India for his trial.

54 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Given the real-world precedents, the court’s decision to deny Asaram bail would have been
based on the fear that bail could undermine the entire legal process, especially in such a
sensitive case involving a vulnerable minor victim and a highly influential spiritual
leader. The court likely concluded that keeping Asaram in custody was the only way to
ensure that the judicial process remained intact and that justice could be served without the
interference of his resources and influence.

In high-profile cases like this, courts have the responsibility to ensure that the accused
cannot use their position of power to escape the consequences of their crimes, something
that has happened too frequently in India. The film highlights this tension between justice for
the victim and the ability of the wealthy or powerful to manipulate the system and shows
how crucial it is for the judiciary to remain steadfast in such cases to preserve the integrity of
the legal process.

C. SOLANKI’S CLOSING STATEMENT

JUSTICE FOR THE VICTIM

The central focus of Solanki’s argument is the victim, a minor who was sexually assaulted by
someone she trusted. Solanki emphasizes that the case is not about the accused’s stature as
a godman but about a young girl whose life was shattered by this crime. His appeal is
rooted in the fundamental principle of justice — protecting the vulnerable and ensuring that
their voices are heard. Solanki reminds the court that sexual crimes, especially against
minors, are among the most heinous offences, causing long-lasting trauma for the
victim. He argues that the legal system must deliver justice to the victim, not just as a matter
of legal procedure but as a matter of human decency and compassion. The fact that the
accused is a powerful religious figure should not be allowed to overshadow the truth of
the crime and the suffering endured by the victim. This point is crucial because it
highlights the inherent imbalance of power in the case — a young girl versus a well-
connected spiritual leader. Solanki's argument frames the case as one where the court must
ensure the victim’s safety and dignity, while also setting a precedent that victims, regardless
of who their abuser is, can expect justice.

ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE POWERFUL

55 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Solanki calls attention to the fact that no one should be above the law, regardless of their
status, wealth, or religious influence. He stresses that the court must hold the accused
accountable for his actions to maintain the principle of equality before the law. By doing so,
the justice system can prove that even those who enjoy immense public adulation cannot
escape punishment if they have committed a crime. The idea that powerful individuals often
evade justice through their influence is a recurring theme in many legal and political contexts.
Solanki's argument challenges this notion head-on. He contends that granting leniency or
special privileges to influential individuals would undermine the very foundation of justice.
In cases where power dynamics are so skewed, it becomes even more critical for the law to
act impartially, ensuring that justice is not bought or manipulated by those in high
positions. This argument resonates deeply because it highlights the systemic issues often
seen in judicial proceedings involving the rich and powerful. Solanki uses the case as a way
to address a broader societal issue: the tendency for influential people to escape justice. He
positions the court as the last defence against the corruption of justice, where the law
should act as an equalizer, ensuring that power does not shield individuals from the
consequences of their actions.

FAITH IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM

Solanki’s closing statement also emphasizes the public’s faith in the legal system. He
argues that this case, given its high-profile nature, has drawn widespread attention, and the
outcome will have a profound impact on how the public perceives the judiciary. If the court
fails to convict the accused based on evidence and facts, it risks undermining society’s trust
in the very institutions that are supposed to protect them. In cases involving prominent
figures, the public closely watches the legal system's ability to deliver justice. Solanki argues
that if the court allows the accused to escape accountability, it could send a message that the
justice system can be manipulated by those with power and influence. This could cause a
ripple effect, leading to disillusionment with the courts and further victimization of people
who might already feel disenfranchised by the system. Solanki’s argument is especially
poignant because it goes beyond the specifics of the case and speaks to the integrity of the
justice system as a whole. By convicting the accused, the court can show that the legal
process works, no matter who the accused is. Conversely, acquitting the accused or being too
lenient could cause irreparable damage to public confidence in the system. The legal system,
in his view, must be seen as transparent, fair, and just.

56 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
MORAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE JUDICIARY

Solanki appeals to the moral responsibility of the judiciary, urging the court to consider the
ethical implications of its verdict. The court, according to him, is not merely dealing with
technical legalities but with the moral fabric of society. The judiciary has a responsibility to
protect the vulnerable, particularly in cases of sexual abuse where the victim’s entire life is at
stake. Solanki is essentially arguing that the court must take a holistic view of the case. It’s
not just about legal statutes and procedures but also about upholding the moral principles
that form the backbone of justice. By delivering a fair and just verdict, the court can set an
important precedent that society, especially the most vulnerable, will be protected from
abuse, regardless of the social standing of the perpetrator. This argument resonates with the
broader societal expectations of the judiciary. In high-profile cases, the court’s decisions
often carry weight beyond the immediate legal implications. A ruling in favour of the victim
reinforces society's belief that moral justice can be achieved through legal means, while
failure to convict could be seen as a failure to uphold ethical standards.

PUNISHMENT AS DETERRENCE

Solanki also underscores the need for punishment as a deterrent. By convicting the accused
and handing down a strong sentence, the court can send a message to society that crimes like
sexual assault will not be tolerated, regardless of who commits them. This serves as a
warning to others who may believe that their power or status can protect them from the law.
The concept of punishment as deterrence is a foundational principle of criminal law. Solanki
argues that by punishing Asaram Bapu, the court would not only be delivering justice in this
individual case but also deterring future wrongdoers, especially those who might be
emboldened by their positions of power. The message would be clear: no one is above the
law. This argument is critical because it goes beyond immediate justice to consider the
broader social implications. The court’s decision can have a lasting impact on how future
cases of abuse, especially by influential people, are handled. Solanki's plea is essentially for
the court to take a stand that would have long-term deterrent effects on society, ensuring
that others in positions of power are dissuaded from exploiting their influence.

57 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
VII. SILENCE, THE COURT IS IN SESSION

GENERAL BACKGROUND

The play “Silence! The Court Is In Session”, written in Marathi by Vijay Tendulkar in 1967
and later translated into English, draws inspiration from Friedrich Dürrenmatt's 1956 short
story “Die Panne” (translated as “Traps”). Dürrenmatt was a Swiss author whose experiences
of World War II influenced his work. This connection highlights how creative writing
transcends cultural boundaries and speaks to the universality of human experience.
Tendulkar's play, recognized as one of his mature works, was adapted into a movie in 1971.
The play, set in the Indian context of the 1950s, reflects the societal changes and challenges
of a newly independent India, blending traditional Indian drama with contemporary issues.

BACKGROUND OF THE PLAY

This is a three-act play depicting the lives of ordinary people in a small town. The characters,
about ten in total, come from diverse backgrounds and are part of “The Sonar Moti Tenement
(Bombay) Progressive Association (SMTPA),” a socially committed group aiming to raise
awareness on important issues through discussions and enactments. In this play, they stage a
mock trial to protest President Johnson’s production of atomic weapons, using the structure
of court proceedings to engage the [Link] of a sudden, the pretend play turns into an
accusatory game when it emerges from the trial that Miss Benare is carrying an out-of-
wedlock child from her failed illicit relationship with Professor Damle, the missing cast
member.

Tendulkar's strategy of using a courtroom setting is brilliant as it invokes an important

institution for resolving civilian issues, emphasizing the principles of justice, fairness, and
unbiased evaluation. The play explores whether such objective justice is delivered. The mock
trial also serves as a forum for open discussion, bringing together a varied group of characters
who form a small social community bound by their commitment to social work.

The play is divided into three acts, all set in the same hall used for various public functions in
the village. The first act begins in this empty hall, introducing all the characters as they gather
for rehearsals. Each act builds on the last, though the summary does not detail the specific
features of each act or their distinct differences.

58 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
LIST OF CHARACTERS IN ORDER OF APPEARANCE

1. Sukhatme: A lawyer who arrives on stage smoking a beedi, is introduced alongside

the other characters.

2. Raghu Samant: A young, mild-mannered man living with his brother and sister-in-
law, devoted to his nephew. He earns enough to get by and helps the group by running
errands and acting as the fourth witness.

3. Leela Benare: A vivacious and unconventional school teacher with eight years of
experience. She is forthright, fun-loving, and laughs at the group's quirks.

4. Servant: Possibly a porter from the station, he carries the dock and witness box onto
the stage, performs his task, and leaves after being paid.

5. Balu Rokde: Raised by the Kashikars, who provided for him while he ran errands for
them. He is subservient and follows their orders.

6. Ponkshe: A science student who has failed his intermediate exams, works as a clerk
at the Central Telegraph office, and smokes a pipe.

7. Mrs. Kashikar: Referred to as "The-hand-that-rocks-the-cradle," she has no children

and is identified primarily as Mr. Kashikar's wife. Her public identity is tied to her
marriage, and her husband often belittles her.

8. Mr. Kashikar: The dominant spouse, self-important, and chairman of the group. He
buys his wife flowers but often cuts her short and belittles her.

9. Local Resident

10. Karnik: An experimental theatre actor who chews pan.

“Shantata” unfolds over a single evening, focusing on middle-class individuals brought

together by the SMTPA for a mock trial on relevant issues. The characters, differing in age,
gender, and social status, might not have met otherwise. The play's mock trial device explores
collective psychology and its impact on individual responses, breaking new ground in
dramatic themes.

59 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
FIRST ACT OF THE PLAY

The play is set in an old community hall used by village residents for various social, cultural,
and group activities. The stage is cluttered with miscellaneous objects, including broken
chairs and worn-out portraits of national leaders, which help create the atmosphere and reveal
details about the characters' world. Samant enters carrying a lock, a key, and a green cloth
parrot, followed by Miss Benare with a purse and a basket of equipment. These objects are
stage props, adding to the atmosphere and providing insights into the characters and their
world.

Benare, a lively and unconventional school teacher, contrasts sharply with the local villagers.
Her interactions with Samant, who is inexperienced and innocent, hint at her complex
personality. Benare's impulsive behaviour, concern about slander, and unconscious gesture of
placing a hand on her stomach add layers to her character. Benare's urgent arrival at the hall
and her desire to leave everyone behind, except Samant, suggest her inner turmoil and
longing for escape.

The play introduces several characters: the Kashikars, an older, childless couple with a
hierarchical relationship; Balu Rokde, an odd-job man often chided by the Kashikars;
Ponkshe, who is self-important despite his intellectual limitations; and Karnik, who joins the
group later. The Kashikars represent a conventional, patriarchal couple, with Mrs. Kashikar
playing a subservient role. Benare's confident rejection of traditional courtship rituals, such as
wearing garlands, contrasts with Mrs. Kashikar's conventional femininity.

As the group gathers in the hall, their interactions reveal underlying tensions and social
dynamics. The absence of Damle, a key member, and the decision to stage a mock trial with
Benare as the accused, add a sense of intrigue and foreboding. The mock trial's accusation of
infanticide against Benare, decided in her absence, shifts the tone from light-hearted to
serious, highlighting societal prejudices and power imbalances.

The play explores themes of gender dynamics and social hierarchy, with Benare's confident
yet vulnerable position standing out. Her interactions with other characters, such as
mimicking Ponkshe and startling new arrivals, show her extroverted nature. However, the

60 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
whisper campaign against her and the mock trial's sinister undertones reveal the challenges
she faces as an unconventional woman in a conservative society.

By the end of the first act, the audience is introduced to all the main characters and their
relationships. Benare's confidence and happiness in the first act contrast with her demeanour
in the later acts, inviting reflection on the societal forces at play. The narrative sets the stage
for the unfolding drama, establishing the characters and their dynamics while hinting at the
societal norms and pressures that will shape the subsequent events.

Balu Rokde is depicted as the odd-job man who runs errands for the Kashikars and is often
awed by them, accepting their superiority. The Kashikars, an older married couple, have a
hierarchical relationship. Mr. Kashikar is the dominant figure, while Mrs. Kashikar is
subservient. Mrs. Kashikar's practice of buying flowers for herself but not for Benare
highlights a contrast between the two women. Benare's declaration of economic
independence and her rejection of traditional courtship rituals further emphasize her
unconventional nature.

The arrival of other characters, such as Sukhatme, Ponkshe, and Karnik, introduces more
social dynamics. Benare's playful interactions, like mimicking Ponkshe and startling new
arrivals, showcase her extroverted nature. However, the decision to stage a mock trial with
Benare as the accused, in her absence, highlights the underlying power imbalances and
societal prejudices. The accusation of infanticide against Benare brings a serious and
foreboding tone to the play.

The narrative highlights the hierarchical and patriarchal nature of society, where even in a
group of social workers, power dynamics and gender biases are evident. The men in the
group, particularly Mr. Kashikar, dominate the proceedings, while the women, including Mrs.
Kashikar and Benare, occupy subordinate roles. Benare's confidence and independence make
her a target for scrutiny and criticism, revealing the challenges faced by unconventional
women in conservative societies.

The play sets the stage for exploring themes of gender dynamics, social hierarchy, and the
impact of societal norms on individual lives. Benare's confident and happy demeanour in the
first act contrasts with her vulnerability and challenges in the later acts, reflecting the societal
pressures and prejudices she faces. The decision to stage a mock trial and the accusation of
infanticide against her highlight the power imbalances and prejudices that shape the
characters' interactions and the unfolding drama.

61 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Classroom discussion:

One of how a playwright connects with the audience is through props. Here Benare and
others who act as witnesses might just act as though there is a witness box but the playwright
specifically mentions that they are carrying these props to make the scene more realistic.

ACT II OF THE PLAY

Act II of Tendulkar’s play begins differently from Act I. While Act I allowed Benare to shape
our understanding of other characters, Act II shifts focus to new revelations about Benare’s
life, provided by the other characters. She is now on trial in multiple ways.

Beware, accused of infanticide, is initially shaken but tries to regain composure. After several
false, comic starts, she denies the charge. Sukhatame, representing the prosecution,
pontificates on the sanctity of motherhood in Indian culture, with Kashikar supporting him by
quoting Sanskrit texts. They highlight the exalted status of mothers, a construct from
nationalist movements and earlier periods that mythologized women within domestic roles.

However, these exalted constructions of motherhood don’t translate into the play’s reality.
Mrs. Kashikar, childless, is not held in high esteem, suggesting women without children lack
status in this group. The play doesn’t depict any actual mother figure, except indirectly
through Samant’s sister-in-law. This contrasts sharply with the court’s glorification of
motherhood and raises questions about the treatment of an expectant mother like Benare.
Benare herself notes the hollow nature of Sukhatame’s and Kashikar’s rhetoric on
motherhood.

The court’s cross-examination of Benare begins by explaining infanticide to Samant, who

recalls a similar case in his village involving a widow. This anecdote ties back to historical
attitudes towards women. In 1882, Tarabai Shinde wrote "StripurushaTulna" in response to
the death sentence of Vijayalakshmi, a young widow convicted of infanticide. Shinde’s tract
criticized patriarchal attitudes that singled out women for blame, noting the absence of any
mention of the men responsible for impregnating them.

Though centuries apart, Benare and Vijayalakshmi share common experiences. Both are
condemned for their pregnancies in societies that disallow sexual freedom for unmarried or
widowed women. Benare, a young unmarried woman in modern India, and Vijayalakshmi, a
widow in orthodox Hindu society, face similar societal outrage and surveillance due to their

62 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
pregnancies. The legal system punishes them, drawing parallels between Tendulkar’s modern
setting and historical practices.

In Act II, the characters’ responses to Benare’s pregnancy are filled with malice and
viciousness. Much of the information presented is fictitious, concocted to build a case against
her. The focus shifts from the charge of infanticide to Benare’s personal life, driven by
speculative and conservative attitudes, particularly from Samant. This shift reveals Samant’s
conservative, perhaps misogynistic, worldview, contradicting his initial timid and simple
portrayal.

Samant’s reference to the widow’s infanticide case connects the narrative to older societal
issues, highlighting the ongoing problem of infanticide. The act of infanticide stems from
rigid societal codes that prescribe and police women’s behaviour, not from inherently cruel
women. Samant’s fabricated narrative to implicate Benare reflects a misogynistic worldview,
explaining why all characters eagerly tarnish Benare’s reputation, portraying her as immoral
and promiscuous.

Despite the absence of concrete evidence, the court scene devolves into a discussion of
Benare’s personal life. Kashikar, as the judge, enjoys the gossipy details provided by
witnesses, despite a mild demurral. This reflects how men view women, conjuring
stereotypical roles and identities for them, with violent undercurrents running through Act II
and reaching a crescendo in Act III.

Ram Sharma draws parallels to Antonin Artaud’s ‘Theatre of Cruelty,’ noting Tendulkar’s
depiction of middle-class societal agonies and individual isolation. Tendulkar, influenced by
Artaud, portrays human violence as a natural, albeit troubling, aspect of society, without
dressing it up to make it palatable. This violence is not unique to the global theatre but
endemic in Indian society, reflecting coercive hierarchies of caste and gender.

In Act II, the accusations against Benare become more personal and disparaging, allowed by
Kashikar under the guise of a mock trial. Benare initially responds lightheartedly but grows
tense and agitated as the questioning intensifies. Her protests against discussing her private
life are ignored, leading her to burst into tears and leave the scene, only to return when unable
to open the stuck door, symbolizing her lack of escape routes.

Kashikar and Sukhatme’s insistence on continuing the mock trial reveals their active interest
in the procedure. Act I’s tension beneath the camaraderie façade is exposed in Act II, where

63 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
the mock trial assumes ugly dimensions. What began in jest now reveals deeper, more
troubling societal issues.

ACT III OF THE PLAY

Act III of Tendulkar’s play is the most intense and serious, extending slightly longer than the
previous acts. At the start, Benare remains in the same position she was at the end of Act II,
refusing to enter the witness box despite Mrs. Kashikar dragging her into it. Initially, Benare
had agreed to the mock trial in good faith, but by Act III, the malice and mischief of the other
characters are evident. The relentless cross-examination of Benare, who does not answer any
questions, escalates beyond reasonable argument. Her silence is interpreted as contempt of
court, and her frustration is seen as defiance, giving the characters an opportunity to testify
against her.

The cross-examination delves into personal matters, with all manner of impertinent questions
asked under the guise of uncovering the truth. Benare’s age, marital status, and personal
choices become focal points for tarnishing her reputation rather than investigating the actual
charge of infanticide. The focus shifts from her supposed crime to an examination of her
character, framed by prejudices and societal expectations for women. Benare’s unmarried
status at thirty-four is portrayed as deliberate promiscuity, and the men who give evidence
against her are not cross-examined. This illustrates the double standards applied to men and
women in patriarchal societies.

Tendulkar uses this to critique societal attitudes and the authority of powerful figures who
perpetuate such injustices. The play shows how judges, prosecutors, and other societal
leaders, who should uphold fairness, are instead the perpetrators of persecution. Their lack of
compassion and humanity leads to the marginalization and victimization of women like
Benare.

In Act III, we learn that Benare has approached several men with marriage proposals, which
shocks the characters. Her quest for a partner, particularly as an expectant mother, is unfairly
judged, despite it being a common practice for prospective brides to be interviewed. The
rejection of her proposals is largely due to her pregnancy. The men she approached, including
those who exploited her or abandoned her, contribute to her suffering and are depicted as
inadequate and cruel. They not only deny her support but actively create difficulties in her
personal and professional life.

64 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
The narrative transitions to a critique of societal morals, with Benare’s personal life
becoming the focus instead of the original charge. Tendulkar highlights how societal leaders
and influential figures, who venerate motherhood in theory, fail to support an expectant
mother in practice. The play demonstrates that the moral outrage directed at Benare is a
reflection of deep-seated societal hypocrisies.

Benare’s soliloquy in Act III allows her to present her side of the story directly to the
audience. She addresses the “cultured men of the twentieth century” with a powerful critique,
exposing their hypocrisy and the harsh realities faced by women like her. Her eloquence and
emotional depth evoke sympathy and underscore her resilience and commitment to her work
and her students. Despite this moving moment, the characters in the play remain unmoved
and indifferent to her plight.

As the mock trial concludes, Kashikar announces the verdict, condemning Benare for her
supposed transgressions and stating that the child she carries will be destroyed. This verdict
symbolizes the harsh judgment and lack of genuine compassion from society. The play ends
with Benare sobbing uncontrollably, refusing to let them destroy her child. The characters
leave, treating the trial as a mere game, while Benare remains motionless on stage.

The final image is of Benare struggling to move, akin to a toy bird, symbolizing her broken
state and the devastating impact of societal cruelty. The playwright leaves her future
unresolved, highlighting her bleak prospects—without economic support, a job, or societal
acceptance. The play concludes on a note of despair, underscoring the harsh realities faced by
women who defy societal norms.

POEMS IN THE PLAY

“Oh, I've got a sweetheart

Who carries all my books,

He plays in my doll's house

And says he likes my looks

I tell you a secret

He wants to marry me.

But mummy says, I am too little

65 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 To have such thoughts as these”

Analysis of “Oh, I’ve got a sweetheart ………… to have such thoughts as these”

The poem is at the scene where everyone gathers at the Community centre. Benare is singing
to herself and leaving the room. In this song, Benare, a young girl, expresses her innocent
feelings of love for her uncle, who represents a significant figure in her life during her
formative years. The song captures the essence of youthful romance, where she feels
cherished and admired for her beauty.

Benare has such strong feelings that she wants to get married to him but her mother explains
to her that she is too little at the age of 14. Benare's struggleis further emphasised by her
desperate act of attempting to escape her reality through suicide. This act symbolizes the
extreme lengths she feels compelled to go to break free from the expectations placed upon
her. The implication is that had her mother not intervened and had her love not been taken
from her, Benare might have found a different path for herself—one where she could
embrace her feelings and desires without fear of societal judgment.

The implication of this song isthat had her mother not stood in their lively life and had her
brave man not “turned tail and ran away”; she would not have found herself in such a
condition. Overall, the song serves as a commentary on the limitations faced by women in
society, particularly regarding love, autonomy, and the pressures of conforming to traditional
roles. It highlights the emotional turmoil that arises when personal desires clash with societal
expectations, ultimately calling for a deeper understanding of women's experiences and the
need for greater freedom in expressing their identities and choices.

“The grass is green

The rose is read

This book is mine

Till I am dead”

Analysis of “The grass is green …………. Till I am dead”

The lines serve as a metaphorical exploration of possession, identity, and the struggle for
freedom within the context of women's experiences in a patriarchal society. The imagery of

66 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
“The grass is green / The rose is red” evokes a sense of natural beauty and simplicity, while
the declaration “This book is mine / Till I am dead” emphasizes a strong sense of ownership
and individuality.

In this context, the book symbolizes Benare's life and autonomy. Just as a book can be owned
and cherished, Benare asserts her right to her own identity and experiences, which cannot be
claimed or controlled by anyone else. This reflects her desire for personal freedom and self-
expression, particularly as an educated modern woman navigating a male-dominated society.

The reference to Benare reading and reciting Mrs. Sirish Pai's poem highlights her
engagement with literature as a means of understanding and articulating her struggles. The
poem she recites addresses the defeat of women in a society that often marginalizes their
voices and choices. By engaging with such literature, Benare not only seeks to empower
herself but also to challenge the societal norms that confine her.

The description of Benare as a “strong-rooted tree” suggests resilience and strength in the
face of adversity. Despite the challenges and societal hurdles, she encounters, her lively
attitude and vivacity shine through. This duality—her outward strength contrasted with the
“throes of pangs” within her heart—captures the complexity of her character. It illustrates
how she navigates her inner turmoil while striving to assert her independence and identity.

“Our feet tread on upon an unknown

And dangerous pathways evermore

Wave after blinded wave is shattered

Stormily upon the shore

Light glows alive again. Again

It mingles with the dark of night.

Our earthen hands burn out, and then

Again in flames, they are alight

Everything is fully known,

And everything is clear to see.

And the wound that's born to bleed

Bleeds on forever, faithfully.

67 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 There is a battle sometimes, where

Defeat is destined as the end

Some experiences are meant

To taste, then just to waste and spend....”

Analysis of “Our feet tread on upon an unknown …………... To taste, then just to waste and
spend....”

The poem captures the tumultuous journey of women navigating a male-dominated world,
filled with both hope and despair. The imagery of “unknown and dangerous pathways”
suggests the uncertainty and risks that women face as they seek to carve out their identities
and lives in a society that often limits their choices. This metaphor of a journey reflects the
broader struggles women encounter as they confront societal expectations and personal
aspirations.

The comparison of experiences to “waves” that “shatter” upon the shore illustrates the
relentless nature of these challenges. Each wave represents a new experience—some bring
hope, while others lead to frustration and disappointment. This cyclical pattern of struggle
and resilience is a central theme, emphasizing that life is a continuous ebb and flow of
emotions and experiences.

Benare's determination to control her life and make her own choices is evident in her ongoing
struggle for freedom. Despite the knowledge of potential loss and defeat, she persists in her
fight, embodying a spirit of resilience. The lines “Everything is fully known, / And
everything is clear to see” suggest a moment of clarity where she acknowledges the harsh
realities of her situation, yet chooses to continue her battle for autonomy and self-fulfilment.

The reference to the “wound that's born to bleed” symbolizes the enduring pain and sacrifices
that women often endure in their quest for identity and agency. This wound, which “bleeds
on forever, faithfully,” reflects the ongoing nature of their struggles, suggesting that while the
fight may be painful, it is also a testament to their strength and perseverance.

The mention of “defeat” being “destined as the end” highlights the acceptance of failure as
part of the journey. Some experiences, as noted in the lines “are meant / To taste, then just to
waste and spend,” suggest that not all struggles lead to success or fulfilment; some are simply
part of the learning process. This acceptance of life's complexities adds depth to Benare's

68 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
character, illustrating her understanding that the journey itself holds value, even in the face of
adversity.

Benare's longing for motherhood and wifehood, as reflected in her subsequent song, further
emphasizes her desire for connection and fulfilment within the confines of societal
expectations. This longing juxtaposes her struggle for independence, highlighting the
multifaceted nature of her identity as a woman navigating both personal desires and societal
pressures.

“The parrot to the sparrow said,

‘Why, oh why, are your eyes so red?’

‘Oh, my dear friend, what shall I say?

Someone has stolen my nest away.’

Sparrow, sparrow, poor little sparrow . . .

‘Oh, brother crow, oh, brother crow,

Were you there? Did you see it go?’

‘No, I don’t know. I didn’t see it.

What are your troubles to do with me?’

O sparrow, sparrow, poor little sparrow . . .”

Analysis of “The parrot to the sparrow said, …………… O sparrow, sparrow, poor little
sparrow . . .”

The poem uses the metaphor of birds, particularly the sparrow, to poignantly illustrate the
struggles and vulnerabilities faced by Benare. The sparrow, with its red eyes, symbolizes
Benare's sorrow and distress, particularly in relation to her fears of losing her child and her
sense of security. The imagery of the nest being stolen reflects the loss of her livelihood and
stability, paralleling Benare's own experiences of being marginalized and threatened in a
patriarchal society.

The song serves as a powerful narrative device, connecting Benare's personal turmoil to the
plight of the sparrow. Just as the sparrow mourns the loss of its nest, Benare grapples with the
loss of her job and the precariousness of her situation as an unmarried mother. The repetition

69 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
of the song throughout the play emphasizes the depth of her despair and the cyclical nature of
her struggles, reinforcing the idea that her pain is both personal and universal among women
facing similar societal challenges.

The characters of the parrot and the crow further enrich this metaphor. The parrot, which can
be associated with Samant, represents a sympathetic figure who acknowledges Benare's
plight. His presence offers a glimmer of understanding and support, contrasting sharply with
the crow, who embodies indifference and apathy. The crow's dismissive attitude— “What are
your troubles to do with me?” —mirrors the responses of the other characters in the play,
such as Mr. Kashikar and Mrs. Kashikar, who, despite being in close proximity to Benare,
show little concern for her struggles. This highlights the isolation and lack of support that
women often experience in their battles against societal norms and expectations.

The trial that Benare faces, where Mr. Kashikar decides on a punishment for her unmarried
motherhood, serves as a critical turning point in the narrative. The threat of forcing her to end
her pregnancy symbolizes the ultimate violation of her autonomy and the harsh realities
women face when they deviate from societal expectations. This act of control over her body
and future further parallels the sparrow's loss of its nest, emphasizing the theme of
dispossession and the struggle for agency.

Overall, the song and its accompanying imagery encapsulate the broader themes of loss,
vulnerability, and the quest for support in a world that often turns a blind eye to women's
suffering. Benare's journey reflects the experiences of many women who find themselves
navigating a landscape fraught with challenges, where their voices and needs are frequently
overlooked. The use of the sparrow as a symbol of her plight serves to humanize her
struggles, inviting the audience to empathize with her situation and recognize the systemic
issues at play.

CHARACTER ANALYSIS BASED ON CLASS NOTES GIVEN BY SUMAN MA’AM

Benare: Miss Leela Benare stands as the most complex and dynamic character in the play,
embodying both resistance and eventual submission to societal pressures. Initially presented
as a vivacious and unconventional school teacher with eight years of experience, she
demonstrates her independence through both economic self-sufficiency and her rejection of

70 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
traditional courtship rituals. Her character arc traces a poignant transformation from a
rebellious, outspoken woman to someone ultimately broken by societal pressure. Benare's
depth is revealed through her sophisticated understanding of the distinction between
education and literacy, and her use of reason and experience to challenge societal norms.
However, the play's progression shows her transformation from a revolutionary figure to a
more domesticated one, as she becomes increasingly pensive and conventional, ultimately
conforming to society's expectations. She both confirms and conforms the society.

Sukhatme: Sukhatme, the lawyer, represents the gatekeepers of justice in society. First
appearing while smoking a beedi, he treats law as an exclusive domain reserved for people
like himself and the judge. During the mock trial, his pontificating about motherhood in
Indian culture reveals his hypocritical nature, as he uses his legal knowledge not to protect
but to persecute. His character exemplifies how institutions meant to protect can become
tools of oppression.

Raghu Samant: Raghu Samant's character presents an interesting evolution throughout the
play. Initially portrayed as a shy, timid character who lacks understanding of courtroom
proceedings, he shows genuine kindness early in the play. Living with his brother and sister-
in-law and being devoted to his nephew, he represents initial innocence. However, his
character arc demonstrates how prejudice can develop, as he eventually adopts the same
biases as other characters, showing how society can corrupt even well-meaning individuals.

Mrs. Kashikar: Mrs. Kashikar embodies the typical woman of the 1950s, known primarily
as "The-hand-that-rocks-the-cradle." Her character presents a complex paradox - while she
speaks frequently, she lacks any real voice or authority. Her childless status creates a void in
her life that influences her behavior, and she exemplifies how victims of oppression can
become oppressors themselves. Her relationship with Mr. Kashikar serves as a clear
illustration of the hierarchical nature of marriage in their society.

Mr. Kashikar: Mr. Kashikar represents patriarchal authority in its most direct form. As the
dominant spouse who often belittles his wife and the self-important chairman of the group, he
uses his position as judge in the mock trial to exercise power over others. His character shows
how authority figures can abuse their positions to enforce societal norms and prejudices.

Balu Rokde: Balu Rokde, raised by the Kashikars, represents subservience to authority and
is described as the embodiment of masculine ego. His role running errands for the Kashikars

71 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 emphasizes his dependent status, making him a symbol of how power structures can create
and maintain dependency.

Ponkshe: Ponkshe presents an interesting contrast as a posh character who speaks English
and smokes a pipe. Despite having failed his intermediate science exams and working as a
clerk at the Central Telegraph office, he shows sympathy toward Benare. His character
represents a more educated but still struggling middle class, suggesting that education might
lead to a more nuanced understanding of social issues.

VIII. THE COLOUR PURPLE

The Colour Purple weaves an intricate mosaic of women joined by their love for each other,
the men who abuse them, and the children they care for. The movie opens withCelie telling
that she has been raped by her father and that she is pregnant for the second time with his
child. Celie's mother is quite ill and after cursing Celie, dies, leaving Celie alone to face her
father. Celie then turns her attention to protecting her sister, Nettie, from her father's sexual
advances. Celie soon marries Mr. _______ (later called Albert) after her father strikes a
bargain with the older widower, and Celie finds herself in a loveless marriage, caring for her
husband's four children and being regularly raped and beaten. Celie becomes fixated on Shug
Avery, a glamorous blues singer who is her husband's mistress.

Mister and Harpo bring home the ailing Shug Avery, a blues singer and Mister's long-time
mistress. Celie is in awe of Shug's strong will. She nurses Shug back to health, and Shug, in
turn, takes a liking to her, writing and performing a song about her at Harpo's newly opened
jukejoint that he operates with his girlfriend, Squeak. Shug tells Celie she is moving to
Memphis, and Celie confides to Shug that Mister beats her. Shug tells Celie that she is
beautiful and that she loves her, and they share a tender moment where they kiss each other.
Celie packs her things to follow Shug to Memphis but is caught by Mister. Celie and Johnson
watch as Shug leaves and Celie passes out on the ground.

The oldest of Celie's stepchildren, Harpo, marries an independent young woman, Sofia, and
soon after, Celie encourages Harpo to beat her into submission, just as all men have beaten
[Link] later confronts Celie about this betrayal. Celie narrates the fact that Sofia and
Harpo continue to fight over time, eventually leading to Sofia and Harpo separating. In town,
the mayor's wife, Ms. Millie compliments Sofia on her raising her children and repeatedly
asks if she wants to work for her. Sofia says, “hell no,” and when the mayor slaps her in the
face, she punches him. She is pistol-whipped, arrested and later imprisoned. Eight years later

72 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
she is released, a shell of her former self, and immediately ordered by the judge to become
Ms. Millie's maid. Ms. Millie agrees to let Sofia spend Christmas with her children. As she
drives out Ms. Millie has trouble putting her car in gear and gets startled by the Black men
who try to assist her. Frightened she asks Sofia to drive her home.

Shug returns to Celie and Mister's home with her new husband Grady, in town on business.
Grady and Mister become intoxicated while Shug checks the mailbox. She finds a letter from
Celie's sister in Africa. Shug gives Celie the letter from Nettie, and Celie and Shug realize
that Mister has been hiding Nettie's letters from Celie. While he and Grady are out drinking,
Shug and Celie search the house, finding a hidden compartment under the floorboards
containing bundles of Nettie's unread letters.

Meanwhile, Nettie has become a missionary in Africa and has written countless letters to
Celie, all of which Albert has hidden. Nettie, despite her upbringing, is a self-confident,
strong, faith-filled woman. When Celie discovers Nettie's letters, she not only catches up on
her sister's life, but she also discovers that her own two children are alive and living with a
missionary couple with whom Nettie works. Nettie's letters about their shared African
heritage are a tonic to Celie, who becomes stronger and more self-assured every day. That
confidence soon turns to fury—over her rapes, her beatings, and the love and affection the
men in her life have kept from her. Nettie's letters also demonstrate parallels between Celie's
world and the African world, including the bond that can develop among the multiple wives
of African men, the deep friendship and love that exists between two women, the deep love
of a man for a woman, and the unrelenting structure of sex roles.

Engrossed in reading, Celie does not hear Mister's calls to shave him, and he slaps her. Celie
sets her mind to kill Mister with his straight razor, but Shug stops her. At a family gathering,
Celie finally speaks up against Mister and his years of abuse, to the delight of Shug. This
fighting spirit also brings back Sofia's old self and prompts Squeak to insist on men using her
real name, Mary Agnes. Celie responds to Mister's taunts with a curse on him. Shug and
Grady drive away, taking Celie and Mary with them.

Years later, Shug reunites with her father, who is a pastor, after years of estrangement
because of his disapproval of the life path she chose. Mister has become a lonely drunk and
let his home and farm fall into ruin. Harpo has made amends with Sofia; they now run the bar
together, and Shug still performs there when she comes to town. Upon Celie's father's
passing, she finally learns from her father's young, child-bride widow that he was not their

73 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
biological father after all. When their mother died, “his” property was legally inherited by
Celie and Nettie, and the home and shop that had belonged to her biological father passed to
Celie.

Celie begins to operate a tailor shop. Mister receives a letter from the U.S. Immigration and
Naturalization Service addressed to Celie, takes money from his secret stash, and arranges for
Nettie and her family, including Celie's children to return to the U.S. from Africa. While
Mister watches from a distance, Celie, Nettie, and the children reunite, and the two sisters
bond over a hand-clapping game from their childhood.

CHARACTER ANALYSIS

Celie

Celie is a young black girl living in Georgia in the early years of the twentieth century. She is
largely uneducated; and speaks in a dialect black folk language, and while it may not be
polished English, it is raw and honest — and strong.

Celie's instinct for survival, however, is more solid than even Celie realizes. She was born
into a poor family; her mother was ill much of the time (later, we find out that she was
mentally ill as well); there were too many children in the family; and then Celie was
victimized by the man who she believed was her father. Celie feels used, she feels that she is
a victim, and she doesn't understand why all this has happened to her. She doesn't complain;
she simply wonders why. In fact, so many bad things have happened to Celie that she feels
worthless. She has very little self-worth and self-esteem.

Slowly, Celie will mature into a woman of enormous confidence — but not before her
beloved sister Nettie is taken from her and not before she herself is married to a cruel man
who really wants to marry Nettie.

For a time, Celie is more a slave to her husband than she is a wife. And then a near-miracle
happens. Her husband's mistress, Shug, comes to the house to recuperate and Celie becomes
her nurse. As Shug grows stronger physically, and as Celie nurses her, Shug encourages Celie

74 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
to grow stronger psychologically. Similarly, Celie's daughter-in-law Sofia shows Celie how
to stand up to men and how to stand up to prejudice and injustice — and fight.

It isn't easy for Celie to learn how to verbalize her independence, and it is harder still for her
to act on these new concepts, but after she discovers how intentionally cruel her husband has
been to her, she rebels and throws off her role as a slave to her husband.

By the end of the movie, Celie's newfound strength, as well as her ever-enduring love for
Nettie, pays off. All through the years, she has kept the memory of Nettie alive, despite the
fact that there was no proof that Nettie was alive. Nettie not only is alive, but she helped raise
Celie's two children, and when the movie ends, Celie and Nettie and Celie's two children,
now grown, are reunited. Despite all the odds, Celie held on. She learned to fight, to stand up
for herself, and she was rewarded. She never gave up on her love for Nettie, nor did she give
up on her love for God. Celie survived physically and spiritually, and she matured into a full,
solid, modern twentieth-century woman.

Shug Avery

Initially, Shug Avery seems little more than a flashy blues singer who is not only selfish but
also arrogant. However, the key to Shug's character is the element of surprise: in particular, it
is never expected the self-centered and seemingly superficial Shug to awaken love and self-
esteem in Celie, and it certainly never expects Celie to awaken generosity in Shug.

Shug befriends Celie, and still later, she becomes her lover. A psychologist would probably
classify Shug as bisexual, but the terminology isn't important. The significance of Celie and
Shug's sexual relationship is that Celie learns how to be proud of her body and how to use it
to enjoy sex.

Celie, in fact, is probably Shug's only authentic friend. When Shug is ill, none of the people
who seem to enjoy her singing come to see her; they enjoy her music more than they like her.
Even her lover, Albert, Celie's husband, doesn't take care of her; he gives her to Celie to care
for. Shug, like Celie, never had much affection in her life, especially when she was growing
up in Memphis, and although Shug and Albert have three children, Shug is not a “mother.”
Shug only becomes a “mother” when she begins to love and respond to the warmth that she
sees in Celie.

75 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Shug's being a blues singer is central to her character. The blues are the simplest form of jazz
— like “Shug” is the simplest form of “Sugar.” And the word “jazz” itself comes from a
West African word meaning, literally, sperm — and, figuratively, life. In turn, Shug brings a
sense of life to her audiences with her singing, and, of course, she brings Celie to life.

Shug is full of life on stage, and she seems to live a sweet life, for the most part, because she
enjoys shaking and crooning. However, Shug's “blues” dimension is defined by her
selfishness — which leads to lonely isolation. In fact, her love for Albert is reduced to a
simple, physical longing for him. He has slighted her twice — by not marrying her initially,
and again by not marrying her after Annie Julia died. Shug resents Albert's slighting her; she
may be a black woman, but she doesn't want to be defined by someone else's sense of a black
woman's worth, or in Albert's particular case, by his sense of a black woman's non-worth.

Being an original, unique kind of black woman in this movie, one of the things that strikes as
most forcefully about Shug is her original concept of God. Shug realizes that although
churchgoers may condemn her and her glowing lifestyle, God himself, or itself,
does not condemn her — because he, or it, is everything. Shug postulates that it is a sin to be
miserable and unappreciative of the world and its beauty.

Finally, Shug is the colour purple personified. She is both red and blue simultaneously.
Red represents jazz and life, and the blues' origins are in misery and disappointment.
Together, red and blue create purple.

Sofia

Sofia is strong, fierce, and daring to a fault. In fact, it is her refusal to lessen or belittle herself
that almost leads to her destruction. As a black American woman reared in the South in the
1930s, she rejects completely the systematic oppression that engulfed the position of the
black woman. In that system, a black person had to remain absolutely subservient to whites
— economically and socially. Blacks worked for whites, who paid them very little. In
addition, a black woman came under the rule of her husband. A black woman was a virtual
prisoner in the system. White men controlled the state, and black men controlled the black
households. Sofia had no chance in such a setting. She simply wasn't suited for it by her very
nature.

76 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Sofia is younger than Celie, which partially explains why she is unable to accept the
confining role laid out by the system for the “meek” black maid and the “dutiful” black wife.
Sofia was meant to rule — not to take orders.

She fights back when Harpo tries to rule her with an iron fist. She wants a partnership
relationship in their marriage, not a master-servant relationship. Sofia is a devoted mother
and an excellent sister to her sisters, and she is generously forgiving. She even befriends
Squeak, her husband's mistress, by volunteering to rear her child until Squeak is able to
establish herself as a blues singer.

After Celie advises her stepson Harpo to beat Sofia into submission, Sofia confronts her.
They are eventually reconciled, of course, but Sofia is thoroughly honest with others, as well
as with herself.

Although Sofia survives severe beatings during her imprisonment, she pays much too much
for being herself, and in the process, she loses much of her strength and dignity. It is ironic
that the value that she places on fighting back is the very thing that prevents her from living
an independent life. Her adamant refusal to be a white woman's maid is eventually crushed,
and she is forced to work — first, without pay in the prison, doing laundry, and then, with
pay, as the white mayor's family maid. It is no wonder that she becomes a stranger to her own
children. But it is to Harpo's credit that he loves Sofia more than anything, and he has a
lasting love for her that proves that he respects her personhood. In summary, Sofia is not
tragic as much as she is symbolic of a woman who had the courage to fight against known
odds.

POINTS OF DISCUSSION

Racism and Repression

Racism, a systematized form of oppression, is a prejudicial attitude that has existed between
races for thousands of years. Racism in America has existed since the colonial era. It involves
laws, practices and actions that discriminate and impact various groups based on their race
and ethnicity. Whites in America enjoyed legally and socially sanctioned privileges and
rights which were denied to other races and minorities.

77 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Despite gradual progress, black women in America are still far behind black men and white
women. Gloria Steinem, in her introduction to Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions,
states this equation very briefly thus: “Just as male was universal but the female was limited,
white was universal but black was limited”. A sense of inferiority and inadequacy was
cultivated by the white dominant group to deprive blacks of their genuine potential. Hence,
the condition of black women from the beginning of slavery has been worse than black men
in the new land of America. They became the victim of racist and sexist oppression including
lynching and rape. They are bound to carry a triple consciousness- race, gender and class for
not only being black but also being female and economically underprivileged in the male-
dominated society. This triple oppression has blocked black women from flourishing their
hidden potential and making a notable involvement in society. Oppressed by black men in
their patriarchal community and white men and women in society, black women have to
struggle for survival both inside and outside their houses. They have been resisting the
multiple repressions of different forms in different ways. They are uniquely rich in resisting
repressions.

This can be meaningfully witnessed in literary works, especially in the fiction works of Alice
Walker, the richly deserving recipient of the Pulitzer Prize for literature in [Link]'s
novels highlight black women, differentiated not only in terms of male standards and poverty
but also more importantly Euro-American women's standards. In her novels, the black
woman is understood in contrast to the white woman. By nature of their race, black women
are considered as lower class, as Barbara Christian in her book, Black Feminist Criticism:
Perspectives on Black Women Writers, remarks:

“They had to work, most could not be ornamental or withdrawn from the world; and
according to the aesthetics of this country, they were not beautiful. But neither were they
men. Any aggressiveness or intelligence on their part, qualities necessary for participation in
the work world, were constructed as unwomanly and tasteless.”

Black American women are considered totally different from other women not only in colour
of skin but also in mental aptitude. They were thought neither beautiful in body nor average
in mental capacity and were taken as unwomanly and tasteless female sex.

African American women have been made victims of racial discrimination by the white
community and sexual repression by black males of their own community. They have been
made prey of both racism and sexism. It is the common experience of black women in

78 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
America. Afro-American women do have their own peculiar world and experiences unlike
any white or black men and white women. They have to fight not only against white
patriarchy and white women's racism but also against the sexism of black men within their
own race.

So, to be black and female is to suffer from the twin disadvantages of racial discrimination
and gender bias. Being black, African women suffer from racism; being females they are
thevictims of sexual atrocities at the hands of the white patriarchs as well as the black male.
Beingformer slaves, black people are forced to live on scarce resources and are compelled to
remainpoor. Needless to say, black women are under financial scarcity within the black
community dueto gender differences. They are confined to the lowest-paying jobs and make
less than half of whatwhite women make. They are positioned within structures of power in
fundamentally differentways than white women.

In other words, the black women in America are made victims of triple jeopardy- racism,
sexism,and classicism. This triple burden has restricted black women from being full human
beings torender meaningful participation in society. Suffering at the hands of both black and
white men,the American black women have to fight for survival both inside and outside their
houses. Walkersees American black women carrying triple consciousness and deals with this
theme in her fictionworks. Through her female characters in the novel, she stresses the fact
that, since black women suffer double or even triple repression, they do have hidden
potentiality to regain their lost selfhood and subjectivity and rightful place in their racist and
sexist society.

Why is the movie called “The Colour Purple”

The colour “Purple” is associated with Royalty and that indicates power in the highest form
but at the same time “Celie” who dreamt of wearing the colour was rendered powerless by
the abuse that she had faced in her life and eventually was trying to gain the power she had
lost. Simultaneously the colour purple is rarely found in nature and even though it is there in
nature it is not often accounted for or not very visible, which was mentioned by Alice Walker
in her interviews, indicating that the stories of Black women were rarely told and that even
though they exist, they are not very visible. The colour also indicates the sexuality of Celie

79 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
who was married off even before she could have explored and identified her sexuality and
then her time with Shug where she was able to explore the same.

At the end of the movie, the purple flowers are visible in the movie indicating that all of them
have visibly reclaimed their identity, their power and some semblance of equality. As Alice
Walker suggests in her interviews, the colour purple's rarity in nature reflects the
underrepresentation of Black women's stories in history and culture. However, through The
Color Purple, both as a title and a visual motif, Walker insists that their stories matter, that
their beauty and resilience are real and that they deserve to be seen and acknowledged. The
colour purple, in its eventual visibility at the end of the film, represents the triumph of these
women over invisibility, marginalization, and silence.

Transfer of Intergenerational Violence

Harpo grows up in an environment where his father, Albert, consistently dominates and
abuses the women in his life, particularly Celie. Albert’s violent control over Celie becomes
the standard for how a man should behave in a patriarchal household, where women are
expected to be submissive. Harpo, influenced by this toxic example, internalizes the idea that
asserting power over a woman through abuse is a natural part of being a man.

However, Harpo’s character is more gentle and less aggressive than his father. His love for
his strong and independent wife, Sofia, clashes with the lessons he has learned from Albert.
Despite this, Harpo attempts to adopt the same abusive behaviours in his relationship with
Sofia, not because of inherent cruelty but because he feels societal pressure to “control” his
wife in the way he has seen his father control Celie. He struggles with insecurity about not
living up to masculine ideals, which leads him to believe that he must use physical
dominance to assert his authority.

An unexpected layer in this cycle of violence is the role Celie plays in promoting Harpo’s
abusive behaviour. As a victim of Albert’s abuse, one might expect Celie to resist violence.
However, when Harpo comes to Celie for advice about how to handle his relationship with
Sofia, she tells him to beat her. Celie’s suggestion reflects the deep psychological impact of
her abuse and her internalized acceptance of violence as a way of maintaining power
dynamics between men and women.

Celie’s advice to Harpo is a result of her conditioning in a world where violence is

normalized as a way to keep women in check. She has been so thoroughly beaten down by
Albert’s abuse that she has come to see it as the only way to survive in a relationship

80 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
dominated by male authority. By suggesting that Harpo beat Sofia, Celie is unconsciously
perpetuating the cycle of violence that she is trapped in, reinforcing the idea that abuse is a
natural part of male-female relationships.

In stark contrast to Celie’s submission, Sofia represents resistance to patriarchal oppression.

When Harpo tries to follow Celie’s advice and beat Sofia, she fights back fiercely, refusing to
accept abuse. Sofia’s refusal to be controlled or dominated is significant because it challenges
the cycle of violence that has been passed down from Albert to Harpo.

Sofia’s strength not only prevents Harpo from continuing the abusive behaviour but also
opens Celie’s eyes to the possibility of resisting oppression. Sofia’s resilience becomes a
turning point for Celie, who eventually begins to question her submission to Albert and the
broader system of violence that has kept her and other women powerless.

While Harpo initially tries to emulate his father’s abusive ways, he eventually comes to
realize that violence is not the answer to his insecurities or the way to maintain a relationship.
His marriage with Sofia suffers as a result of his attempts to control her, and it is only when
he lets go of the need to dominate her that they begin to rebuild their relationship on more
equal terms.

Celie’s journey toward empowerment also involves rejecting the cycle of intergenerational
violence. Her friendship with Shug Avery and her exposure to Sofia’s defiance leads her to
find her voice and stand up to Albert. In doing so, she breaks free from the patterns of abuse
that had defined her life and begins to reclaim her sense of self-worth.

Sisterhood of the Women

In The Color Purple, the development of oppressed women is deeply intertwined with the
themes of sisterhood and solidarity. The bond between Celie and Shug Avery is central to
Celie’s journey of empowerment. Shug’s love and care allow Celie to rediscover her self-
worth, reclaim her body, and find her voice. Shug helps Celie realize that she is deserving of
love, pleasure, and autonomy, challenging the abusive norms that had previously defined her
life. Their relationship becomes a source of emotional healing and growth, demonstrating
how female solidarity can empower women to resist oppression and claim their
independence.

Similarly, Celie’s bond with her sister Nettie represents an enduring form of sisterhood that
transcends distance and time. Nettie’s letters provide Celie with hope and connection,
reminding her that she is not alone. Even when separated, their relationship sustains Celie
81 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
through the darkest periods of her life. Nettie’s experiences in Africa further broaden Celie’s
understanding of oppression, showing that the struggles of Black women are both local and
global. This bond of sisterhood, which is built on unconditional love, highlights the resilience
that women can draw from one another in the face of adversity.

Sofia’s journey provides another perspective on the strength of solidarity. Unlike Celie, Sofia
refuses to submit to abuse or racial oppression, embodying defiance and resistance. Though
Sofia faces immense suffering for standing up to the white community and resisting Harpo’s
control, her spirit is not entirely broken. Her eventual recovery and reunion with her family,
supported by the women around her, illustrate the power of collective resilience. The
relationships between Celie, Shug, Nettie, and Sofia show that while individual
empowerment is essential, it is through their shared experiences and mutual support that they
find the strength to resist and survive.

A similar sisterhood was seen in the case of Kiranjit Ahluwalia where women’s rights
groups like Southall Black Sisters, campaigned for her release. In this case, Kiranjit
Ahluwalia, an Indian woman, moved to the UK after her arranged marriage to Deepak
Ahluwalia. For over a decade, she endured severe physical, emotional, and sexual abuse from
her husband. Deepak’s abuse was relentless, including regular beatings, humiliation, and
threats against her life. Feeling isolated, helpless, and without any means of escape, Kiranjit
felt trapped in her marriage, with little to no support system.

In 1989, after years of suffering, Kiranjit reached a breaking point. One night, after another
violent episode where her husband threatened her life, she set him on fire while he was
asleep, leading to his death. Kiranjit was arrested and charged with murder. At her initial
trial, the court failed to consider the prolonged abuse she had endured, and her actions were
viewed as premeditated murder rather than a desperate response to years of domestic
violence. As a result, she was sentenced to life imprisonment.

Southall Black Sistersargued that Kiranjit was a victim of “battered woman syndrome,” a
psychological condition that explains how prolonged abuse can trap victims in cycles of
helplessness, often leading them to act in extreme ways to protect themselves. In 1992, her
case was appealed, and her murder conviction was reduced to manslaughter on the grounds of
diminished responsibility. Kiranjit was released after serving three years in prison.

Intimate partner violence in the Movie

82 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Intimate partner violence (IPV) within heterosexual relationships is a critical social and
public health problem that disproportionately affects African American women. IPV includes
any physical or sexual violence, psychological aggression, stalking, and/or controlling
behaviours. African American women are more likely than women of other racial and ethnic
groups in the United States to be murdered by their intimate partner. Furthermore, African
American women experience IPV-related homicide at younger ages. The average age at
which she is murdered by her intimate partner is 36 years old, which is 5 years younger than
the national average. Still, they are more likely to remain with their abusive partner rather
than seek help from service providers due, in part, to the racism and racial discrimination
they experience during help-seeking. Fundamental to improving their outcomes is more fully
understanding the effects that representational intersectionality has upon their IPV help-
seeking experiences.

SUPPOSED REASONS WHY BLACK WOMEN ENDURE VIOLENCE

Stereotypes that Black women are put into

Patricia Hill Collins (2002) introduced the concept of “controlling images” to explain how
stereotypes about African American women, such as the Mammy, Jezebel, and Sapphire, are
used to justify their oppression. These images go beyond mere stereotypes, reinforcing
essentialism—attributing inherent, unchangeable traits to people based solely on their race
and gender—which overlooks the social and political factors shaping African American
women’s experiences. Essentialism normalizes exploitation and violence against them by
portraying these traits as “natural.”

Three prominent stereotypes have historically shaped the treatment of African American
women:

1. Jezebel – This stereotype depicts African American women as hypersexual, immoral,

and aggressive, justifying their sexual exploitation during and after slavery. It
rationalized their rape, reproductive exploitation, and sexual abuse, which continues
to affect how they are treated in society and legal systems today.

2. Mammy – The Mammy stereotype presents African American women as nurturing,

obedient, asexual, and self-sacrificing. It was used to justify their exploitation as
caretakers of white families during slavery and afterwards. This trope still influences
perceptions of African American women as being naturally strong and resilient,

83 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 making their economic exploitation and underdiagnosis of stress or depression more
acceptable.

3. Sapphire/Matriarch/Angry Black Woman – This stereotype portrays African

American women as confrontational, emasculating, and lazy, using their perceived
aggressiveness to justify their mistreatment in social systems like welfare. It
discourages African American women from challenging the status quo and continues
to blame them for societal issues.

Another modern stereotype is the Strong Black Woman (SBW) archetype, which positions
African American women as strong, self-reliant, and emotionally controlled. While often
viewed positively, it also contributes to stress-related disorders, emotional suppression, and
depression. This archetype is tied to historical trauma, and adherence to it has led to harmful
perceptions that African American women can endure more suffering, making them less
likely to receive proper healthcare and support.

Seeking help being Off Limit

Help-seeking is defined as the process that a survivor utilizes to disclose, garner support,
and/or secure formal services for partner abuse. Help-seeking within the African American
community is complex and often compounded by social and racial pressures. African
American women are often celebrated for their strength, resilience, and ability to privately
handle their problems. This stance counters traditional IPV help-seeking values of securing
more public mechanisms of assistance. In addition, African American women are often
socially perceived as betraying their partner and the entire African American community
when they violate their socially prescribed role of protecting their man from the police rather
than secretly suffering from victimization. This is particularly at issue since the criminal
justice system historically gives African American male perpetrators harsher penalties than
White males. During criminal justice system intervention, survivors are typically referred to
the shelter for emergency housing and the health care system for immediate medical
attention. Due to cultural norms of religiosity within the Black community, it is common for
survivors to also garner assistance via their church and religious resources.

Intersectional Approach

84 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Intersectionality illuminates the “triple jeopardy” sociological barriers of racism, capitalism,
and sexism that African American women experience. The idea is that multiple oppressions
reinforce each other to create new categories of suffering. Later, the term and the analysis
that articulates and animates the meaning of intersectionality were conceptualized by second
and third-wave feminists. Intersectionality utilizes three constructs that may preclude African
American women from securing necessary assistance:

(1) structural intersectionality,

(2) political intersectionality, and

(3) representational intersectionality.

Structural intersectionality provides a framework for exploring African American women’s

social mapping and juxtaposes their qualitative differences with that of White women’s
experiences. The systemic barriers that African American women experience during formal
help-seeking evidence of this phenomenon. Political intersectionality frames how the agendas
of feminist and antiracist politics concurrently marginalize the needs of African American
women. This is reflected in the paucity of resources and dearth of culturally congruent
interventions that have been specifically designed and implemented, as well as the
differential way they are treated when engaging with various aspects of the service provision
system. Representational intersectionality identifies the nature in which pop culture’s
representations objectify, denigrate, and disempower African American women as evidenced
in the racialized archetypes and tropes used to minimize African American women’s
experiences and diminish their voices. Racialized images that essentialize and objectify
African American women likely underpin the implicit biases that frame their adverse
interactions with domestic violence service providers during help-seeking.

THEORIES OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

Rights Theory

Rights theories of domestic violence see abuse as resulting from a failure to recognize the
individual human rights of women. The family and its interests are considered before the
85 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
individual, and a woman's status is a derivative one. For example, her reproductive capacity
is considered “owned¦ by the husband's lineage after marriage. In a context where the notion
of personal autonomy is not common, especially for women, claims articulated in terms of
individual rights and equality may indeed sound foreign. They also are unlikely to attract the
widespread support necessary to effect social change. As Robin West noted, women live in
relationships, in a complex web of connections, rather than as individual atoms. The conflict
between the language of individual rights and a more relational notion of the self is even
more pronounced in the African context. It is not only that women experience themselves as
embedded in relationships but also that traditional African societies typically are not based
upon the individualism that underlies much of our social thought.

Feministic Explanations

Almost every traditional society was patriarchal, and a woman's place within this scheme was
decidedly subordinate. So much so that this violence has been institutionalised in terms of the
rights that these women have in society, the conclusion reached is that unless the systemic
inequality between men and women is addressed, the problem of violence will persist.
Rosemary Ofei-Aboagye documented the case that came to her for legal assistance analysis
of the women's comments led her to attribute domestic violence in large part to the
subordinate position, passivity, and economic dependence of married women in her society.

Cultural Explanations

Cultural explanations are more indirect, pointing, for example, to the uneven distribution of
power within traditional African American marriages, the impact of polygamy, the
acceptance of male promiscuity, the power of the extended family over the married couple,
and the almost universal institution of bride price as underlying the widespread abuse of
wives. The payment of bride price to the wife's family at the time of their marriage makes it
difficult for women to leave abusive husbands unless their families of origin are willing to
return the amount paid. Violence in these communities also arises from quarrels over money
and at times jealousy.

Two types of domestic violence-producing situations relate to this double standard. The first
situation is when a wife is seen as challenging her husband's authority and prerogatives by
inquiring about his extramarital involvements. In this scenario, violence erupts when women
ask their husbands where they have been and with whom, or express their sense of threat at

86 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
the addition of multiple wives, which is increasingly seen—realistically in the modern
economy—as a threat to the economic survival of the first wife, her children, and also as a
potential source of HIV/AIDS.33 In short, the wife's questioning is itself a challenge to the
husband's traditional rights and is seen as a threat to his culturally prescribed position,
provoking violence in response.

The second situation involving jealousy as a “cause” of domestic violence centres on the
husband’s jealousy of his wife's contact with other men. In traditional African American
society, a married woman would have minimal contact with men other than her husband, but
this is much less possible today, especially when the couple lives in an urban area and/or the
woman works. Yet tradition-minded husbands feel threatened by the interaction between their
wives and other men and may act out violently because of that threat, whether imagined or
real.

Society in Transition Explanation

This theory focuses on the societal shifts occurring in African American communities and
how these changes contribute to domestic violence. As African American women and
families transition through socio-economic changes, including migration to urban areas and
changes in traditional roles, tensions arise. These tensions are often linked to a perceived loss
of power and control by men, leading to violence as a way to reassert dominance. Social
transitions, such as economic stress and shifts in gender expectations, create environments
where violence becomes a response to challenges in maintaining traditional power dynamics.

Culture of Violence

This explanation asserts that violence is embedded within the cultural and social fabric of
some communities, including African American ones. The acceptance or normalization of
violence, whether through media, community norms, or even personal experiences, leads to a
higher incidence of domestic violence. In this context, violence is viewed as an accepted
method of resolving conflicts or asserting control. Cultural norms that condone aggression,
coupled with socio-economic disadvantages, can foster a “culture of violence” where
domestic abuse is more prevalent.

Psychological and Economic Explanation

87 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
This theory examines the psychological factors that may lead to domestic violence, such as
trauma, mental health issues, or personality disorders, as well as the economic pressures that
exacerbate these conditions. African American women, often facing both systemic racism
and economic disadvantages, experience additional stresses that can contribute to violence
within the home. Economic instability, unemployment, and poverty create pressures that can
lead men to feel emasculated or powerless, leading them to use violence as a way to reclaim
control. Psychological interventions and economic support systems are often suggested as
remedies.

IX. STOPPING BY WOODS ON A SNOWY EVENING

BACKGROUND

“Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening” was written just several years after the conclusion
of World War I, which had forced Frost to move from England, where he briefly lived, back
to the United States. Though his poetry never overtly dealt with the war, the devastating
conflict cast a huge shadow over much of modern literature and art at the time. Poets found
themselves grappling with the place of the individual in a world that perhaps lacked meaning
or God. Such questions can be seen indirectly in “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening,”
whether it is the speaker's meditation on solitude or the more foreboding and ominous symbol
of despair that may be suggested in the powerful draw of the woods.

SUMMARY OF THE POEM

“Whose woods these are I think I know.

His house is in the village, though;

He will not see me stopping here

To watch his woods fill up with snow.”

In this stanza, the speaker begins by acknowledging the ownership of the woods, indicating
familiarity with the area. The phrase “I think I know” suggests a tentative certainty, as if the
speaker is musing to himself. The mention of the owner's house being in the village
highlights the isolation of the woods, reinforcing the speaker's sense of solitude. The speaker

88 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
is reassured by the thought that the owner is not nearby to witness him pausing to admire the
woods, which allows him a moment of private contemplation. The woods, filling up with
snow, symbolize a peaceful yet desolate beauty that captivates the speaker, drawing him into
a brief moment of stillness in his journey.

“My little horse must think it queer

To stop without a farmhouse near

Between the woods and frozen lake

The darkest evening of the year.”

In the second stanza, the speaker imagines his horse’s thoughts, reflecting the oddity of their
stop in such a desolate place. The use of the word “queer” highlights the unusual nature of the
situation, as stopping in the middle of nowhere without a farmhouse or other familiar
landmarks would indeed be strange for the horse. The setting between the woods and a frozen
lake emphasizes the cold and stillness of the scene. The phrase “the darkest evening of the
year” could refer to the winter solstice, the longest night of the year, adding a sense of
foreboding and deepening the atmosphere of solitude and introspection. This darkness might
also metaphorically reflect a period of inner reflection or melancholy for the speaker.

“He gives his harness bells a shake

To ask if there is some mistake.

The only other sound is the sweep

Of easy wind and downy flake.”

Here, the horse becomes an active participant in the scene, shaking its harness bells as if to
question the speaker’s decision to stop. This action introduces the idea of the horse as a
companion with a mind of its own, albeit one limited to the practical concerns of the journey.
The gentle sound of the bells contrasts with the silence of the surroundings, where the only
other sounds are the “easy wind” and the soft falling of snowflakes. The phrase “downy

89 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
flake” suggests the delicate and light nature of the snow, adding to the sense of tranquillity.
The quietness of the scene underscores the isolation and the introspective mood, as the
speaker is alone with his thoughts, accompanied only by the subtle sounds of nature.

“The woods are lovely, dark and deep,

But I have promises to keep,

And miles to go before I sleep,

And miles to go before I sleep.”

In the final stanza, the speaker expresses an almost irresistible draw toward the woods,
describing them as “lovely, dark and deep.” These adjectives convey both the beauty and the
mystery of the woods, suggesting that they hold a certain allure or temptation. However, the
speaker is reminded of his responsibilities—his “promises to keep.” This line introduces a
sense of duty and obligation that prevents him from succumbing to the enchantment of the
woods. The repetition of “And miles to go before I sleep” serves to emphasize the weight of
these responsibilities and the distance, both literal and figurative, that the speaker still has to
travel before he can rest. The word “sleep” may also carry a metaphorical meaning,
potentially referring to death, implying that the speaker has much to accomplish before his
life's journey can come to an end. The repetition also reinforces the idea of persistence and
determination, as the speaker pushes on despite the temptations to linger in the peaceful
woods.

POETIC DEVICES

Metaphor

Extended Metaphor: While the poem doesn’t have traditional metaphors, it includes two
significant extended metaphors:

o “Sweep of easy wind and downy flake”: This phrase metaphorically extends
the idea of the gentle, almost caressing movement of wind and snow. The
“sweep” suggests a soft, graceful motion, and the “downy flake” evokes the

90 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 image of feathers, implying that the snow is light and soft. This metaphor
enhances the tranquil, comforting atmosphere of the woods.

o “And miles to go before I sleep”: In this line, “miles” metaphorically

represent life’s journey, while “sleep” represents death. The repetition of this
line emphasizes the speaker’s awareness of the responsibilities and tasks that
must be completed before reaching the end of life. This metaphor captures the
tension between the desire for rest and the demands of duty, reflecting the
inevitability of life’s journey toward its final rest.

Personification

Personification of the Horse: Frost personifies the horse, giving it human-like qualities,
particularly in the second and third stanzas.

o Example: “My little horse must think it queer / To stop without a farmhouse
near.” Here, the horse is portrayed as capable of thought, finding it strange to
stop in an unusual place.

o Example: “He gives his harness bells a shake / To ask if there is some
mistake.” The horse is depicted as if it is asking the rider why they’ve stopped,
suggesting an understanding of the situation. This personification adds depth
to the relationship between the rider and the horse, making the animal a
sentient companion on the journey, rather than just a means of transportation.

Imagery

Visual Imagery: Frost uses vivid imagery to create a detailed, sensory-rich scene that allows
readers to visualize the setting and feel the emotions of the speaker.

o Example: “Whose woods these are I think I know.” The image of the woods
immediately places the reader in a secluded, quiet, and possibly mysterious
environment.

o Example: “Between the woods and frozen lake / The darkest evening of the
year.” This imagery emphasizes the cold, dark, and solitary nature of the
scene, contributing to the poem’s contemplative mood.

91 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Auditory Imagery: The poem also appeals to the sense of hearing.

o Example: “The only other sound’s the sweep / Of easy wind and downy
flake.” This line helps the reader imagine the almost imperceptible sound of
the wind and snow, enhancing the sense of stillness and peace.

Alliteration

Alliteration is the repetition of consonant sounds at the beginning of words, adding rhythm
and musicality to the poem.

o Example: “Watch his woods” (repetition of the /w/ sound).

o Example: “Sound’s the sweep” (repetition of the /s/ sound).

o Example: “His house” (repetition of the /h/ sound).

These instances of alliteration draw attention to specific phrases and create a smooth, flowing
sound that mirrors the gentle movement of the snow and wind in the woods.

Assonance

Assonance is the repetition of vowel sounds within proximity, contributing to the poem’s
internal rhyme and euphony.

o Example: “He will not see me stopping here” (repetition of the /e/ sound).

o Example: “He gives his harness bells a shake” (repetition of the /i/ sound).

The assonance in these lines enhances the lyrical quality of the poem, making it more
pleasant to read aloud and adding to the overall musicality.

Consonance

Consonance is the repetition of consonant sounds within or at the end of words nearby. This
device reinforces the poem’s rhythm and unity.

o Example: “Whose woods these are I think I know” (repetition of the /w/ and
/th/ sounds).

92 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
 o Example: “To watch his woods fill up with snow” (repetition of the /w/
sound).

These repeated consonant sounds create a harmonious effect, linking words and ideas
together, and contributing to the poem’s overall coherence and flow.

Euphony

Euphony refers to the use of words and phrases that are pleasing to the ear, often through the
combination of harmonious sounds and gentle rhythms.

o Example: The entire poem can be seen as an example of euphony, especially

in lines like “The woods are lovely, dark and deep” and “The only other
sound’s the sweep / Of easy wind and downy flake.”

The poem’s soft, flowing sounds and peaceful imagery create a soothing, calming effect,
making the woods seem inviting rather than ominous. The use of euphony reflects the
speaker’s attraction to the serene beauty of the woods, even as he acknowledges his
responsibilities.

THEMES

Nature vs. Society

In “Stopping By Woods on a Snowy Evening,” the speaker describes stopping to watch the
snow fall while riding a horse through the woods at night. While alone in the forest, the
speaker reflects on the natural world and its implicit contrast with society. Though Frost’s
poem resists a definitive interpretation, the natural world it depicts is at once “lovely” and
overwhelming. The fact that it seemingly lures the speaker to linger in the dark and cold
suggests that nature is both a tempting and a threatening force, a realm that resists people’s
efforts to tame it while also offering respite from the demands of civilized life.

The poem presents the natural world as distinctly separate from human society. The poem
begins with the speaker thinking about who owns the property he is passing through
—”Whose woods these are I think I know”—yet it’s clear that there's no one there to stop the
speaker from trespassing. The owner’s “house is in the village,” meaning “he will not see”

93 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
the speaker. While this owner may think the woods belong to him, he can’t control who
passes by “his” land any more than he can stop the woods from “fill[ing] up with snow.” The
land owner’s absence and futility, in turn, suggest that the human impulse to dominate the
natural world is misguided.

The complete lack of signs of civilization, meanwhile, further emphasizes the distance
between society and nature. There are no farmhouses nearby, and the only sound apart from
the “harness bells” of the speaker’s horse is that of the wind. Though the speaker
acknowledges that, at least conceptually, he or she stands in someone else’s woods, the
physical isolation indicates the impotence of conceptual structures like ownership in the first
place. In other words, people can say they “own” land all they want, but that doesn't mean
anything when those people aren't around. Far from the sights and sounds of the village, the
speaker stands alone “Between the woods and frozen lake” on the “darkest evening of the
year.” Together all these details again present nature as a cold and foreboding space distinct
from society.

At the same time, however, the woods are “lovely” enough that they tempt the speaker to stay
awhile, complicating the idea of nature as an entirely unwelcoming place for human beings.
Indeed, though the setting seems gloomy, the speaker also recounts the “sweep / Of easy
wind and downy flake.” This language makes the setting seem calm and comforting. The
speaker finds the wind “easy” or mellow and the snowflakes “downy,” like the soft feathers
that fill a blanket or pillow. Finally, in the final stanza, the speaker definitively says, “The
woods are lovely, dark and deep.” This suggests the speaker’s particular interest in the
solitude that the woods offer.

Though the speaker knows that he or she “has promises to keep”—suggesting certain societal
demands that pull the speaker to continue—the woods are a tempting place to stop and rest.
For a moment, the speaker can pause for no reason other than to simply watch the falling
snow. However raw and cold, then, nature also allows for the kind of quiet reflection people
may struggle to find amidst the stimulation of society.

Social Obligation vs. Personal Desire

Though the speaker is drawn to the woods and, the poem subtly suggests, would like to stay
there longer to simply watch the falling snow, various responsibilities prevent any lingering.
The speaker is torn between duty to others—those pesky “promises to keep”—and his or her

94 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
wish to stay in the dark and lovely woods. The poem can thus be read as reflecting a broader
conflict between social obligations and individualism.

This tension between responsibility and desire is clearest in the final stanza. Although “the
woods are lovely,” the speaker has other things to which he or she must attend. This suggests
that the speaker is only passing through the woods on some sort of business—which, in turn,
helps explain how unusual it is that the speaker has stopped to gaze at the forest filling with
snow. Indeed, the fact that the speaker’s horse must “think it queer”—even a “mistake”—that
they’re stopping implies that the speaker’s world is typically guided by social interaction and
regulations, making solitary, seemingly purposeless deeds especially odd. The speaker
doesn’t seem to be the kind of person who wastes time or reneges on his promises. However
much the speaker might like to stay in the “dark and deep” woods, then, he or she must
continue, once again prioritizing responsibility to others and social convention.

Of course, the speaker seems to show some ambivalence toward these social obligations. The
speaker subtly juxtaposes his or her interest in the woods with regret about his or her duties to
others: the woods are lovely, “but I have promises to keep.” The promises seem to be a
troublesome reality that keeps the speaker from doing what he or she wants to do—that is,
staying alone in the woods for a little while. Indeed, the specific language that the speaker
uses to describe the woods suggests he or she isn’t quite ready to leave. They are
“lovely, dark and deep,” implying the woods contain the possibility for respite from the
comparatively bright and shallow world of human society. Social responsibilities thus inhibit
the chance for meaningful reflection.

Additionally, the image of snow’s “downy flake” suggests that the speaker is as attracted to
the woods as one might be to a comfortable bed. The speaker seems wearied by travel and
social obligation, and the woods seem to represent his or her wish to rest. But this wish
cannot be realized because of the oppressive “miles to go,” which must be travelled as a
result of duty to others (i.e., to“keep” those “promises”). Thus, the final lines may suggest the
speaker’s weariness both toward the physical journey that remains and the social rules that
drive that very journey forward in the first place.

Ultimately, we don't know if the speaker satisfies his or her social duties or remains in the
woods. On the one hand, the admittance of having “promises to keep” can be read as the
speaker accepting that social obligations trump individual wishes. Yet it's also possible to
read the final lines as the speaker’s continued hesitation; perhaps the speaker

95 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
is thinking about the miles left to go but not yet doing anything about it, instead remaining
torn between the tiresome duties of society and the desire for individual freedom that is
manifested in the woods.

Hesitation and Choice

Throughout the poem, the speaker seems to be stuck in a space between society’s obligations
and nature’s offer of solitude and reflection. Though the speaker reflects on the possibilities
offered by each, he or she is ultimately never able to choose between them. The speaker’s
literal and figurative placement seems to suggest that choice itself might not even be possible,
because societal rules and expectations restrict the speaker's free will. In other words, beyond
exploring the competing pulls of responsibility and personal desire on the speaker, the poem
also considers the nature—or mere possibility—of choice itself.

The speaker starts and ends the poem in a state of hesitation. In the first line, the speaker
says, “Whose woods these are I think I know,” a statement which wavers between a sure
declaration (“I know”) and doubt (“I think”). This may suggest that the central conflict of the
poem will be the speaker’s battle with uncertainty. The physical setting of the poem, in which
a speaker stops partway through a journey, mirrors this irresolution, finding the speaker
neither at a destination nor a point of departure but rather somewhere in between.

The speaker also notably pauses “between the woods and frozen lake”—literally between two
landmarks. On top of that, the speaker has stopped on the “darkest evening of the year.”If we
understand this to mean the Winter Solstice, then the poem also occurs directly between two
seasons, autumn and winter. Thus, the speaker is physically poised on the brink between a
number of options, suggesting the possibility of choice between physical worlds, and, later in
the poem, between duty to others and a personal wish to rest in solitude.

However, it's unclear in the end if the speaker chooses to fulfil his or her “promises” or
merely accepts the obligation to do so as an incontrovertible fact of life; that is, whether he or
she actively makes a choice to continue or accepts that there is no choice at all. Though the
speaker seems to indicate in the end that he or she will continue and keep his or her promises,
this doesn’t seem to be a straightforward decision. It may not be a decision at all, but rather
an embittered consent to the rules of societal life. The speaker may very well wish to stay in
the “lovely” woods but is ultimately unable to do so.

However, we can also read the final stanza as demonstrating that the speaker hasn't left the
woods yet. Although he or she has obligations, there are “miles to go,” and the dreamy

96 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
repetition of the final lines could suggest that there are either too many miles left to travel or
even that the speaker is slipping into sleep—effectively refusing to make a choice (or
implicitly choosing to stay, depending on your interpretation).

Thus, it is possible to read the entire poem as embodying a moment of hesitation, wavering
between two poles but never leaning toward one or the other. This would further complicate
the outcome of the poem, resisting a definitive reading and suggesting that the tensions
between society and nature, and between obligation and individualism, are never black-and-
white, but constantly in a murky state of flux.

X. LINES WRITTEN IN EARLY SPRING BY WILLIAM WORDSWORTH

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO THE POEM

Wordsworth was the first among the romantic poets. Most of his poems reflect his connection
with nature. It was also the period of the industrial revolution in the United Kingdom.
Wordsworth was against the industrial revolution which tampered with nature and destroyed
the peaceful society.

Hence most of his poems reflect this sorrow. Wordsworth was a spokesperson for peaceful
country life and the glory of nature. According to him industrialization and modernization
destroyed this equilibrium of harmony and peace. Even in the poem “Lines Written in Early
Spring”, he is trying to express this laminate and brief.

SUMMARY OF THE POEM

I heard a thousand blended notes.

While in a grove I sat reclined.

As the poet sits in a peaceful grove, surrounded by a dense cluster of trees, he is immersed in
the sounds of nature. He listens intently, and the air is filled with a symphony of harmonious
notes. These are the songs of various birds, blending in a melodious chorus. The poet is at
ease, reclining comfortably as he soaks in the tranquil beauty of his surroundings. The
melodies lift his spirits, bringing him a sense of deep contentment and joy. However, as he

97 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
continues to listen, the initial joy he feels starts to fade, and his thoughts begin to shift
towards a more reflective and sorrowful mood.

To her fair works did Nature link

The human soul that through me ran;

In this moment of contemplation, the poet reflects on the profound connection between nature
and the human soul. He realizes how intricately his being is linked to the natural world
around him. The poet is struck by the beauty and perfection of nature's creations, and he feels
a deep sense of unity with the world. This connection stirs something within him, reminding
him of the innate bond that humans share with the earth and all its living things. It is a bond
that brings a sense of peace and belonging as if nature itself is a part of his very soul.

And much it grieved my heart to think

What man has made of Man?

However, this sense of unity and peace is overshadowed by a growing sorrow in the poet's
heart. As he sits there, he cannot help but feel a deep grief when he thinks about the actions
of mankind. The poet is troubled by the thought of how humans, who are part of this
beautiful natural world, have caused so much harm to one another and the earth. He laments
how humans have strayed from the harmony that nature embodies, instead creating a world of
conflict, destruction, and suffering. The poet's heart aches as he considers the tragic
consequences of humanity's choices.

And 'tis my faith that every flower

Enjoys the air it breathes.

As the poet continues to observe the natural world around him, he turns his attention to the
flowers growing nearby. He notices the delicate primroses that surround him, and it occurs to
him that these flowers, though simple and small, are filled with joy. They seem to relish the
air they breathe, finding contentment in their existence. The poet believes that each flower, in
its own way, experiences the pure pleasure of life. It is as if they are grateful for the simple,
essential gift of air, and this quiet appreciation fills them with serene happiness.

98 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
The birds around me hopped and played

Their thoughts I cannot measure

The poet then shifts his gaze to the birds that flit and flutter around him. He watches them as
they hop from branch to branch, playing and enjoying the day. Although he cannot know the
precise thoughts of these birds, he senses their happiness through their lively movements.
Their joy is evident in the way they interact with their environment, moving with a lightness
that reflects their contentment. The poet realizes that this happiness stems from the birds'
ability to live in harmony with their surroundings, finding delight in the simple, everyday
moments of life.

The budding twigs spread out their fan

To catch the breezy air;

Looking further, the poet's eyes fall upon the twigs of the trees around him. He observes the
new leaves that are beginning to sprout, delicate and fresh, as they unfold like tiny fans.
These young twigs and leaves reach out eagerly as if to catch the gentle breeze that flows
through the grove. Even these small, budding parts of the trees seem to find pleasure in the
world around them. The poet marvels at how even the simplest aspects of nature, such as a
leaf catching the wind, are infused with a sense of joy and fulfilment.

Have I no reason to lament

What man has made of Man?

In the final reflection, the poet draws together his observations and thoughts. He sees how all
the elements of nature—flowers, birds, and trees—live in harmony with one another, finding
happiness in their existence. This natural state of contentment stands in stark contrast to the
way humans live. The poet is filled with sorrow as he considers how far humanity has strayed
from this natural harmony. The contrast between the peace of nature and the discord of
human life makes him realize that he has every reason to mourn the state of mankind. The
poet's lament is a profound expression of his grief over the loss of a simpler, more

99 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
harmonious way of living, where humans could live in peace with each other and with the
natural world.

LITERARY DEVICES

Wordsworth makes use of several literary devices in ‘Lines Written in Early Spring’. These
include but are not limited to ALLITERATION, ENJAMBMENT, and IMAGERY. The
latter is perhaps the most important technique at work in the poem. It can be seen from the
first line to the last. The poet taps into a variety of human senses to accurately and vividly
depict the landscape he’s seeing.

Imagery

Imagery is the most prominent literary device used throughout the poem, as Wordsworth
vividly paints the scene of a tranquil, natural landscape. He taps into a variety of human
senses—sight, sound, and touch—to create a rich, immersive experience for the reader. For
example, the “thousand blended notes” he hears in the grove immediately pulls the reader
into a world filled with the sounds of nature. The imagery here is auditory, as the poet listens
to the harmonious sounds that surround him. As the poem progresses, the visual imagery
becomes more pronounced, with descriptions of flowers, birds, and budding twigs. The poet
carefully describes these elements to convey not just their physical presence, but also the
deeper emotional responses they evoke. The imagery of “budding twigs” spreading out “their
fan” to catch the breezy air, for instance, not only helps the reader visualize the scene but also
suggests a sense of renewal and vitality inherent in nature. This use of imagery serves to
highlight the contrast between the beauty and harmony of nature and the sorrowful reflections
on human actions, which is central to the poem’s theme.

Alliteration

Alliteration is another key literary device used in the poem, contributing to the musical
quality of Wordsworth’s verse. It involves the repetition of the same consonant sound at the
beginning of closely connected words, creating a sense of rhythm and cohesion. For instance,
in the first stanza, the words “sweet” and “sad” in lines three and four form an alliterative
pair. This repetition of the ‘s’ sound adds a gentle, flowing quality to the lines, enhancing the
emotional impact of the poet’s words. The contrast between “sweet” and “sad” also reflects
the poem’s underlying tension between joy and sorrow, reinforcing the complex emotions the

100 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

poet experiences as he contemplates the beauty of nature alongside the sorrow of human
failings. Alliteration is used sparingly but effectively throughout the poem to draw attention
to specific phrases and to create a sense of unity within the lines.

Personification

In "Lines Written in Early Spring," Wordsworth employs personification to imbue elements

of nature with human qualities, enhancing the emotional depth of his observations. By
attributing human feelings to natural elements, he creates a vivid connection between the
observer and the environment, emphasizing the joy and vitality present in [Link] instance,
when Wordsworth writes that flowers “enjoy” the air they breathe, he attributes a sense of
consciousness and pleasure to them. This personification conveys the idea that nature itself is
alive and capable of experiencing happiness, mirroring the poet’s feelings of contentment as
he immerses himself in the beauty around him. This human-like joy found in flowers serves
as a stark contrast to the sorrow and suffering experienced by humanity, suggesting that while
human affairs can be marred by pain, nature remains a source of untainted [Link],
Wordsworth describes the birds as having a playful quality, capturing their movements in a
way that makes them seem almost whimsical. When he notes how they “hopped and played,”
the birds are imbued with a sense of spontaneity and joy that reflects the carefree spirit of
nature itself. This personification not only highlights the liveliness of the scene but also
evokes a sense of nostalgia for the simplicity and purity of nature, reinforcing the idea that
the natural world exists in a state of bliss that contrasts sharply with human [Link],
Wordsworth’s use of personification in the poem serves to bridge the gap between humanity
and nature, illustrating how deeply interconnected these realms are. By giving nature human
attributes, he underscores the emotional resonance of his reflections and invites readers to
share in the joy and beauty he perceives, even amidst the backdrop of human suffering.

ADDITIONAL LITERARY DEVICES

1. Enjambment: In "Lines Written in Early Spring," Wordsworth employs enjambment

to enhance the fluidity of his observations, reflecting the uninterrupted harmony of
nature. For example, in the transition between the first and second lines of the second
stanza, his reflection on how “Nature link[s]” with the human soul flows directly into
the next line, emphasizing this profound connection. Similarly, in lines three and four
of the fourth stanza, the description of how the birds around him “hopped and played”

101 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

 flows seamlessly, mimicking their carefree movements and capturing the spontaneity
and joy of life.

2. Parallelism: The repetition of similar structures in the poem, such as in the lines
“And 'tis my faith that every flower / Enjoys the air it breathes” and “The birds
around me hopped and played,” creates a sense of balance and harmony. This
parallelism reinforces the theme of natural harmony and the poet’s lament for
humanity’s departure from this ideal.

3. Anaphora: The repetition of the phrase “What man has made of man” serves as a
refrain in the poem, highlighting the poet’s deep concern with the consequences of
human actions. This repetition not only emphasizes the theme but also creates a
rhythmic structure that echoes the recurring thoughts in the poet’s mind.

POETIC PHILOSOPHY (PANTHEISM)

Wordsworth's pantheistic philosophy, rooted in his reverence for nature, was a central theme
in his poetry. According to the Oxford Dictionary, pantheism is “a doctrine which identifies
God with the universe or regards the universe as a manifestation of God.” Wordsworth saw
nature as a direct manifestation of the divine, and this belief permeated his work. In
Wordsworth's poems, a profound and harmonious relationship between humanity and the
natural world is evident. He often drew inspiration directly from nature, expressing his deep
admiration without limitations. His communion with nature was so intense that he would
often wander along paths, immersing himself in the tranquillity of the natural world while
composing his poems.

Wordsworth's renowned poem, “Lines Written in Early Spring,” exemplifies his pantheistic
worldview. Published in 1798 as part of the collection “Lyrical Ballads,” it is considered a
seminal work that marked the inception of the English Romantic movement in literature. The
poem comprises six quatrains, each following an ABAB rhyme scheme and written in iambs.
The title, “Lines Written in Early Spring,” evokes a sense of renewal and beauty, hinting at
the themes explored within. In this poem, Wordsworth draws a parallel between the state of
humanity and the state of nature. He suggests that, from the perspective of happiness,
mankind and nature are intricately connected. The lines “To her fair works did Nature link /
The human soul that through me ran; And much it grieved my heart to think / What man has
made of man” (lines 4-8) underscore this interconnectedness, emphasizing the shared essence

102 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

of the human soul and the natural world. Wordsworth employs various literary devices, such
as personification, to convey his ideas. For instance, he personifies a flower, stating, “And 'tis
my faith that every flower / Enjoys the air it breathes” (lines 11-12), attributing human-like
characteristics to the natural world. Similarly, in stanza 5, he personifies budding twigs,
giving them the ability to spread out their fan to catch the breezy air: “The budding twigs
spread out their fan, / To catch the breezy air” (lines 17-18). Furthermore, Wordsworth
describes nature as a sentient being with the capacity to plan: “If this belief from heaven is
sent, / If such be Nature's holy plan” (lines 21-22). This portrayal reinforces his pantheistic
belief that nature is not just a passive entity but an active force that reflects divine intent.
Interestingly, the poem takes a melancholic turn as the speaker contemplates the perfection of
nature. He experiences a sense of sadness, triggered by the stark contrast between the
tranquillity of nature and the turmoil of human existence. The poem raises questions about
mankind's role in disrupting the harmony of the natural world.

XI. MERCHANT OF VENICE- ACT IV SCENE 1

SUMMARY OF ACT IV SCENE I

In the Venetian court, the Duke expresses pity for Antonio, who is at the mercy of Shylock,
whom he calls an "inhuman wretch". Despite the Duke's attempts to sway him, Shylock
remains unyielding. Antonio resigns himself to Shylock's rage, prepared to face it with
dignity. The Duke anticipates that Shylock will ultimately show mercy, expecting "a gentle
answer" from the Jew, playing on the word "gentile" to highlight the Christian expectation of
mercy.

Shylock insists on his bond, asserting that denying it would undermine Venice's justice
system. He refuses to provide a reason for wanting flesh instead of money, comparing his
inexplicable hatred for Antonio to others' dislike of certain animals. Shylock is portrayed as
inhuman, leading him to compare Antonio to animals. Bassanio's attempts to reason with
Shylock are futile, as Antonio notes that softening Shylock's "Jewish heart" is as impossible
as arguing with a wolf. Bassanio offers Shylock twice the owed amount, but Shylock refuses,
claiming he wouldn't accept six times that amount. The Christians' abuse and prejudice are
identified as fuels for Shylock's rage.

The Duke questions how Shylock can expect mercy when he shows none. Shylock argues he
needs no mercy as he has done no wrong. He comments that the Venetians assembled have

103 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

purchased slaves, asses, dogs, and mules; and just as those creatures belong to their owners,
Antonio's pound of flesh belongs to Shylock, who has purchased it.

The Duke introduces "mercy" as an alternative to either "justice" or "revenge." Shylock,

however, sticks by his claim that he has the law on his side: he has bought Antonio for
money, just like other Venetians buy the flesh of animals and slaves.

The Duke announces that Doctor Bellario, a wise lawyer, will assist in judging the case. As
Salerio fetches letters from Bellario, Bassanio encourages Antonio, who compares himself to
a "tainted wether". Antonio's self-sacrifice and reference to himself as a castrated ram suggest
deeper feelings for Bassanio.

Nerissa enters disguised as a lawyer's clerk, delivering a letter from Bellario to the Duke.
Shylock prepares his knife, while Gratiano curses him as an "inexecrable dog". Shylock
calmly insists that the law is on his side. Shylock believes he is doing no worse than the
Christians, as their laws restrict his life, and his contract now restricts Antonio's.

The Duke announces that Bellario recommends Balthazar, a young lawyer who is familiar
with the case. Portia enters disguised as Balthazar and asks to identify the merchant and the
Jew. The question, potentially a joke in its time, now highlights Antonio and Shylock's shared
humanity. Portia acknowledges that Venetian law favors Shylock but urges him to show
mercy. She describes mercy as "an attribute to God himself". Shylock rejects her plea,
demanding the law. Portia champions mercy as superior to justice or revenge, but Shylock
insists on a strict legal interpretation for vengeance.

Portia asks if Antonio can repay Shylock, and Bassanio states that he has offered ten times
the sum. Bassanio pleads for the law to be bent to save Antonio's life. Portia argues that the
law cannot be bent, as it would set a chaotic precedent. Shylock praises Portia, comparing her
to Daniel from the Hebrew Bible. Portia reviews the contract and again advises Shylock to
accept three times the amount owed. Shylock refuses.

Portia's examination of the case mirrors the suitors' attempts to solve the riddle of the caskets,
treating the law as something to be interpreted. Shylock's reference to Daniel, renamed
Balthazar, grounds his actions in Jewish beliefs. Portia states Shylock is entitled to a pound of
flesh nearest Antonio's heart and once more begs him to be merciful. Shylock refuses. Portia
instructs Antonio to prepare for Shylock's knife and inquires about scales. Shylock has

104 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

brought scales. Portia suggests a surgeon be present to prevent Antonio from bleeding to
death, but Shylock declines due to the contract's terms.

Portia persistently calls for Shylock to show mercy, but he insists on a literal interpretation of
the law. Antonio, preparing to be cut open, increasingly resembles a Christ-like figure.
Antonio tells Bassanio not to grieve and to speak well of him after his death. Bassanio and
Gratiano offer to sacrifice their own lives and their wives' lives to save Antonio. Portia and
Nerissa, in disguise, joke about the wives' displeasure at such sentiments. Shylock is
surprised that Christian husbands would willingly sacrifice their wives and wishes his
daughter had married anyone but a Christian. Shylock demands the court stop wasting time,
and Portia agrees.

Antonio, Bassanio, and Gratiano demonstrate extreme friendship and generosity. Shylock's
surprise at their willingness to sacrifice their wives suggests he may deserve more sympathy
than the Venetians. Shylock's sadness at Jessica's theft and sale of Leah's ring is noted.

As Shylock is about to cut Antonio, Portia reminds him that the contract does not allow for
any blood. She states that if Shylock sheds "one drop of Christian blood", his possessions will
be confiscated and given to the city. Portia outmaneuvers Shylock by interpreting the law
more strictly, finding a loophole to save Antonio.

Shylock tries to backtrack and accept Bassanio's offer of 9000 ducats, but Portia stops him.
She insists Shylock wanted justice and will receive it, demanding he take exactly a pound of
flesh without any blood. She warns that any deviation will result in his death and confiscation
of his property. Shylock asks for his initial 3000 ducats back, but Portia denies him anything
beyond the contract.

Portia ensures Shylock adheres strictly to the contract. She invokes another Venetian law
stating that if an "alien" seeks the life of a "citizen," the citizen receives half the alien's
property, and the state receives the other half, while the alien's life is at the Duke's mercy.
She advises Shylock to beg the Duke for mercy. The tables have turned on Shylock, who now
must beg for mercy.

The Duke declares he will show Shylock "the difference of our spirit", sparing Shylock's life
but requiring him to give half his wealth to Antonio and half to Venice. Antonio proposes
that the state renounce its claim, with his half going to Lorenzo and Jessica after his death.
Shylock is forced to convert to Christianity and leave his wealth to Lorenzo and Jessica.

105 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

The Duke and Antonio soften Portia's judgment but strip Shylock of his Jewish identity and
livelihood by forcing his conversion and preventing him from practicing usury. Portia
mockingly asks, "Are you contented, Jew?". Shylock concedes, and Portia orders the deed
drawn up. Shylock, feeling unwell, asks for the deed to be sent to him for signing. Gratiano
expresses that Shylock is lucky to receive baptism instead of being hanged.

Portia becomes less gracious, reminiscent of her earlier interactions with Nerissa. Gratiano
displays his characteristic bitterness. The Christians appear less gracious. The Duke invites
Portia to dinner, but she declines, citing her need to return to Padua. Antonio and Bassanio
thank Portia. Bassanio offers Portia the 3000 ducats, but she refuses. Bassanio insists on a
gift. Portia requests Antonio's gloves and Bassanio's ring. Bassanio hesitates, explaining that
the ring is a gift from his wife with a vow not to lose it. Portia dismisses this as a convenient
excuse.

Antonio tells Bassanio to value Balthazar's efforts above his wife's orders and to give up the
ring. Bassanio relents and sends Gratiano with the ring to Balthazar. Bassanio and Antonio
depart for Antonio's house to rest before returning to Belmont.

THEMES

Law, mercy and revenge

Both the central action of The Merchant of Venice—Shylock's attempt to revenge himself on
the Christian Antonio—and the romantic subplot—between Bassanio and Portia—explore the
relationship between law, mercy, and revenge.

Shakespeare's contemporary, the philosopher Francis Bacon, defined revenge as a "kind of

wild justice." When one private individual decides to revenge himself on another, he is going
outside the official justice system. And yet, as the phrase "wild justice" suggests, the revenger
is responding to what he sees as a "higher law." The revenger takes the law into his own
hands when he feels that the state is not capable of or refuses to enforce justice. Therefore,
while law and revenge are technically opposed to each other, since revenge is illegal, they
also overlap. Shylock, pursuing Antonio's "pound of flesh," exposes the intimate connection
between law and revenge. He seeks vengeance against Antonio precisely by sticking to the
letter of the law within the Venetian justice system.

In the courtroom scene of Act 4, scene 1, both the Duke and Portia present mercy as a better
alternative to the pursuit of either law or revenge. Shylock explicitly refuses to show mercy,

106 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

while the Christians, in sparing Shylock's life in the end, claim that they have. Yet, when they
do, Shylock himself asks to be killed. He says that, having had all of his possessions
confiscated and his religious identity revoked (which would also make it impossible for him
to work as a money-lender, since Christians were not allowed to practice usury), he has
nothing left to live for. The question of who is or is not merciful, therefore remains open.

Prejudice and intolerance

The Venetians in The Merchant of Venice almost uniformly express extreme intolerance
of Shylock and the other Jews in Venice. In fact, the exclusion of these "others" seems to be a
fundamental part of the social bonds that cement the Venetian Christians together. How
otherwise would the ridiculous clown Launcelot ingratiate himself with the suave Bassanio?
Or why would the sensitive Antonio tolerate someone as crass as Gratiano? It is possible to
argue that Shakespeare himself shares his characters' certainty that the Jews are naturally
malicious and inferior to Christians because of Shylock's ultimate refusal to show any mercy
at all and, as a result, his pitiful end.

Yet there are also reasons to think that Shakespeare may be subtly criticizing the prejudices
of his characters. Shylock's fury comes not from some malicious "Jewishness" but as a result
of years of abuse. For example, though he is criticized by Antonio for practicing usury
(charging interest on borrowed money) Jews were actually barred from most other
professions. In other words, the Christians basically forced Shylock to work in a profession
that the Christians then condemned as immoral. Shylock insists that he "learned" his hatred
from the Christians, and it is Shylock alone who argues that all of the characters are the same,
in terms of biology and under the law. Viewed this way, The Merchant of Venice offers a
critique of the same prejudices that it seemingly endorses.

CHARACTERS INVOLVED

Shylock

A Jewish moneylender in Venice who has been embittered by years of abuse at the hands of
Venetian Christians and Antonio, the merchant, in particular. Shylock's anger and bitterness
lead him to sign a contract with Antonio, in which Antonio puts up a pound of his own flesh
as collateral for a loan. When Antonio can't cover his loan, Shylock refuses to show any
mercy and insists that the law be upheld and that he get to take his pound of flesh. The other
characters, including Shylock's own daughter, Jessica, consider him inhuman—bestial or

107 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

demonic. However, their treatment of Shylock helps illuminate the prejudice and hypocrisy
that lies behind many of their stated ideals of human brotherhood and Christian fellowship.

Antonio

A prosperous Venetian merchant, liked and admired by his fellow citizens. To help his friend
Bassanio woo Portia, Antonio signs a contract with Shylock, guaranteeing a loan with one
pound of his own flesh as collateral. Many critics argue that Antonio harbors an unrequited
erotic desire for Bassanio. In contrast to the benevolence that he shows others, Antonio
expresses an intense hatred of Shylock and the Jews, though at the end of the play he does
argue that Shylock should be shown mercy and not be condemned to death.

Portia

A beautiful, clever, and wealthy noblewoman who lives in the country estate of Belmont,
outside Venice. Portia is bound by a clause in her father's will, which obligates her to marry
whoever solves the so-called riddle of the caskets, by choosing the correct chest from one of
gold, one of silver, and one of lead. After despairing over a parade of suitors whom she finds
distasteful, Portia does get to marry her true love, Bassanio, who happily makes the correct
choice. She also saves Antonio's life, during his trial with Shylock, dressed up as a lawyer
named Balthazar. For centuries, Portia was admired as an ideal of feminine virtue. However,
many modern critics have pointed out that Portia, though seemingly a genius and a perfect
wife, regularly displays a vicious prejudice toward non-Christians and foreigners.

Bassanio

A nobleman from Venice, who is a kinsman, close friend, and longtime debtor of the
merchant, Antonio. Because he wants to woo the noble Portia, but cannot himself afford to
do so, Bassanio borrows 3000 ducats from Shylock, with Antonio as his guarantor. His status
as Portia's suitor and, later, her husband, makes Bassanio the romantic hero of the play.
However, his character is deeply flawed. At best clueless, and at worst consciously selfish
and manipulative, he always manages to avoid earning his own way: first, he exploits the
generosity of his friend Antonio, and then he freely passes on the money and gifts that Portia
gives him.

THE QUALITY OF MERCY IS NOT STRAINED

The quality of mercy is not strained;

It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven

108 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

 Upon the place beneath. It is twice blest;
It blesseth him that gives and him that takes:
'T is mightiest in the mightiest; it becomes
The throned monarch better than his crown:
His sceptre shows the force of temporal power,
The attribute to awe and majesty,
Wherein doth sit the dread and fear of kings;
But mercy is above this sceptred sway;
It is enthronèd in the hearts of kings,
It is an attribute to God himself;
And earthly power doth then show likest God's
When mercy seasons justice. Therefore, Jew,
Though justice be thy plea, consider this,
That, in the course of justice, none of us
Should see salvation: we do pray for mercy;
And that same prayer doth teach us all to render
The deeds of mercy. I have spoke thus much
To mitigate the justice of thy plea;
Which if thou follow, this strict court of Venice
Must needs give sentence 'gainst the merchant there.

Analysis

In The Merchant of Venice (Act IV, Scene 1), Portia delivers one of the most profound
speeches in Shakespearean literature, emphasizing the importance of mercy over strict
justice. She presents mercy as a natural, reciprocal, and divine quality that holds more
power than legal authority or vengeance. Through her words, Shakespeare explores how
mercy elevates individuals, humanizes rulers, and aligns earthly justice with divine will.

Mercy as a Natural Virtue

Portia begins her speech by asserting that mercy is an inherent quality, one that cannot be
forced:

"The quality of mercy is not strained;

It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven

Upon the place beneath."

109 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho
Here, she compares mercy to rain from heaven, suggesting that true mercy, like rain, is
natural and unconditional. Just as rain nourishes the earth without discrimination, mercy
nurtures both the giver and the recipient. By linking mercy to an uncontrollable, celestial
phenomenon, Shakespeare implies that mercy is a divine gift rather than a human
obligation.

Mercy as a Blessing for Both Giver and Receiver

Portia further elaborates on the reciprocal nature of mercy, stating:

"It is twice blest:

It blesseth him that gives and him that takes."

This idea reinforces the notion that showing mercy is not an act of weakness but of
strength. It elevates the person who grants it, allowing them to act with nobility and grace,
while also benefiting the recipient by offering them relief from harsh punishment. This
argument challenges the rigid perspective of Shylock, who seeks strict justice rather than
extending mercy. By suggesting that mercy uplifts both parties, Portia highlights its
transformative power in human relationships and governance.

Mercy vs. Earthly Power

Portia then contrasts mercy with conventional symbols of authority, arguing that true
strength lies in compassion rather than coercion:

"’Tis mightiest in the mightiest; it becomes

The throned monarch better than his crown."

A monarch’s crown represents political dominance, while their sceptre symbolizes the fear
and awe they command. However, Portia asserts that mercy is a greater quality than either
of these symbols of power. A ruler who governs solely through fear may command
obedience, but one who governs with mercy earns genuine loyalty and admiration.

Furthermore, she reinforces this idea by saying:

"But mercy is above this sceptred sway;

It is enthronèd in the hearts of kings."

Here, mercy is depicted as a divine virtue that resides in the hearts of great rulers rather
than in material symbols of rule. Shakespeare thus presents mercy as a quality that makes a
leader truly great, transcending the mere authority of law and fear.

110 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

Mercy as a Divine Attribute

Portia then elevates mercy beyond human governance, linking it directly to divinity:

"It is an attribute to God himself;

And earthly power doth then show likest God's

When mercy seasons justice."

This statement underscores that mercy is not just a human virtue but a divine principle. In
Christian theology, God tempers justice with mercy, granting forgiveness rather than absolute
punishment. Portia implies that human rulers and legal systems should emulate this divine
model—justice alone is insufficient for a truly fair society.

The phrase "when mercy seasons justice" is particularly striking. Justice, like food, can be
harsh and unpalatable without the right balance of mercy. By using this metaphor,
Shakespeare suggests that true justice is not rigid or mechanical but must be tempered with
compassion to be truly just.

Mercy vs. the Rigid Application of Justice

Portia acknowledges the importance of justice but warns of its limitations if applied without
compassion:

"Though justice be thy plea, consider this,

That, in the course of justice, none of us

Should see salvation."

Here, she introduces a moral dilemma: if justice were enforced strictly, without mercy, no
one would be saved, as all humans are flawed. This aligns with Christian teachings on grace
and forgiveness, where strict adherence to the law alone would lead to universal
condemnation.

She further supports this argument by reminding Shylock of human hypocrisy:

"We do pray for mercy;

And that same prayer doth teach us all to render

The deeds of mercy."

111 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

Every person expects mercy when in need, yet not everyone extends it to others. By
pointing this out, Portia subtly urges Shylock to reconsider his insistence on justice,
emphasizing that mercy is a moral duty, not just an act of kindness.

ADDITIONAL THEMES

The Relationship Between Mercy and Power

Portia turns her attention to how mercy relates to rulership and authority. She states that
mercy "becomes the thronèd monarch better than his crown," implying that a king's true
greatness does not come from his symbols of power (such as a crown or sceptre) but from his
ability to rule with compassion. While the sceptre represents “temporal power” and
commands obedience through fear, mercy transcends such earthly authority.

This part of the speech is particularly important because it highlights an ideal vision of
leadership—one where justice is tempered by humanity. Portia suggests that rulers who
exhibit mercy embody divine qualities, making them more godlike in their governance. This
is a significant argument in a courtroom setting, as it implies that even a legal judgment
should not be devoid of compassion.

The Theological Argument: Justice Alone is Inadequate

One of the most compelling parts of Portia’s speech is her theological reasoning:

“Through justice be thy plea, consider this,

That, in the course of justice, none of us

Should see salvation; we do pray for mercy.”

Here, Portia argues that if people were judged solely on justice—without any room for mercy
—no one would be saved. In Christian theology, salvation is granted through divine mercy
rather than strict justice, because all humans are flawed. By invoking this idea, Portia subtly
urges Shylock to reflect on his own imperfections and reconsider his insistence on the rigid
enforcement of the law.

This argument places Shylock in a difficult position. If he continues to demand justice

without mercy, he effectively aligns himself against the very principles that allow for human
redemption. This is a powerful rhetorical move, as it forces him to either concede to mercy or
risk appearing cruel and unforgiving.

112 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

The Irony of Portia’s Plea for Mercy

Despite her eloquent defense of mercy, the dramatic irony of the play lies in the fact that
Portia herself does not extend mercy to Shylock. After he refuses to show compassion, she
uses legal technicalities to defeat him, stripping him of his wealth and forcing him to convert
to Christianity.

This raises an important question: Is Portia truly advocating for mercy, or is she using it as a
tool to manipulate the situation in Antonio’s favor? Her speech is undoubtedly beautiful and
compelling, but its effectiveness is undermined by the fact that she ultimately ensures
Shylock receives no mercy at all.

The Broader Implications: Justice vs. Mercy in Society

Shakespeare’s exploration of justice and mercy in this scene extends beyond the courtroom of
Venice—it serves as a reflection on how laws should function in society. Should justice
always be administered strictly, without room for compassion? Or should mercy be integrated
into legal decisions to account for human complexity?

Portia’s speech suggests that a legal system devoid of mercy is harsh and unforgiving, yet the
events that follow highlight the difficulty of balancing these ideals. The play, therefore, does
not provide a simple answer but instead forces the audience to wrestle with the complexities
of law, morality, and power.

XII. TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD(SUMMARY)

SUMMARY

Young Scout and her older brother Jem live in Maycomb, Alabama, during the early 1930s.
Despite the family's modest means, the children enjoy a happy childhood with their widowed
father, Atticus Finch, and their African-American housekeeper, Calpurnia.

Over the summer, Jem, Scout, and their friend Dill play games and often search for Arthur
"Boo" Radley, an odd, reclusive neighbor who lives with his brother Nathan. The children
have never seen Boo, who rarely leaves the house. Occasionally, Jem has found small objects
left inside a tree knothole on the Radley property. These include a broken pocket watch, an
old spelling bee medal, a pocket knife, and two carved soap dolls resembling Jem and Scout.

113 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

Atticus, a lawyer, strongly believes "all people deserve fair treatment, in turning the other
cheek, and in defending what you believe." Many of Atticus' clients are poor farmers who
pay for his legal services in trade, often leaving him fresh produce, firewood, and so on.[5]
Atticus' work as a lawyer often exposes Scout and Jem to the town's racism, aggravated by
poverty. As a result, the children mature more quickly.

The local judge asks Atticus to defend Tom Robinson, an African-American accused of
raping a white girl named Mayella Ewell, and Atticus agrees. This heightens tension in the
town and causes Jem and Scout to experience schoolyard taunts.

One evening before the trial, Atticus sits out front to safeguard Robinson when a lynch mob
arrives. Scout, Jem, and Dill unexpectedly interrupt the confrontation. Scout, unaware of the
mob's purpose, recognizes Mr. Cunningham and asks him to say hello to his son Walter, her
classmate. He becomes embarrassed, and the mob disperses.

At the trial, it is alleged that Tom entered the Ewell property at Mayella's request to chop up a
chifforobe and that Mayella showed signs of having been beaten around that time. One of
Atticus' defensive arguments is that Tom's left arm is disabled due to a farming accident years
ago, yet the supposed rapist would have had to mostly assault Mayella with his left hand
before raping her.

Atticus shows that Mayella's father, Bob Ewell, is left-handed, implying that he beat Mayella
because he caught her seducing the young African-American defendant. He also states that a
doctor never examined Mayella after the alleged rape. Taking the stand, Tom denies he
attacked Mayella, but states that she kissed him against his will. He testifies that he had
previously assisted Mayella with various chores at her request because he "felt sorry for her"
– words that incite a swift, negative reaction from the prosecutor, and a gasp from the white
audience.

In his closing argument, Atticus asks the all-white male jury to cast aside their prejudices and
focus on Tom's obvious innocence. However, Tom is found guilty. As Atticus exits the
courtroom, the African-American spectators in the balcony rise to show their respect and
appreciation.

114 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

When Atticus arrives home, Sheriff Tate tells him Tom was killed during his transfer to
prison, supposedly while attempting to escape. Atticus goes to the Robinsons’ to inform them
of Tom's death, accompanied by Jem. Bob Ewell appears and spits in his face.

Autumn arrives, and Scout and Jem attend an evening school pageant in which Scout portrays
a ham. After the pageant, Scout is unable to find her dress and shoes, forcing her to walk
home with Jem while wearing the large, hard-shelled costume. While cutting through the
woods, Scout and Jem are attacked. Scout's cumbersome costume protects her but restricts
her vision. The attacker knocks Jem unconscious, but is himself attacked (and killed) by a
second man, unseen by Scout. Scout escapes her costume and sees the second man carrying
Jem towards their house. Scout follows them and runs into the arms of a frantic Atticus. Still
unconscious, Jem has his broken arm treated by Doc Reynolds.

Scout tells Sheriff Tate and her father what happened, then notices a strange man behind
Jem's bedroom door. Atticus introduces Scout to Arthur Radley, whom she knows as Boo. It
was Boo who rescued Jem and Scout, overpowering Bob Ewell and carrying Jem home. The
sheriff reports that Ewell, apparently seeking revenge for Atticus humiliating him in court, is
dead at the scene of the attack. Atticus mistakenly assumes Jem killed Ewell in self-defense,
but Sheriff Tate realizes the truth – Boo killed Ewell defending the children. However, he
insists on declaring Ewell simply fell on his knife, refusing to drag the painfully shy and
introverted Boo into the spotlight for his heroism. To Atticus' surprise, Scout agrees, pointing
out that the unwelcome attention would be like killing a mockingbird that does nothing but
sing.

THEMES EXPLORED

Good, Evil, and Human Dignity; Co-existence of Good and Evil

In To Kill a Mockingbird, Scout's journey from childhood innocence to a more nuanced

understanding of good and evil is central to the novel's exploration of morality and human
dignity. Initially, Scout and her brother, Jem, possess a simplistic, "black and white" view of
the world, dividing people into distinct categories of "good" and "evil". They see most of
Maycomb as good, while the Radley family, particularly Boo Radley, and their neighbor,
Mrs. Dubose, are considered evil. However, Scout's observations sometimes contradict these
rigid categorizations, highlighting the complexity of human nature. For instance, she
recognizes that Miss Stephanie, a seemingly respectable Maycomb lady, is a gossiper whose

115 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

words cannot be trusted. The children's perception of Boo Radley as evil is based on rumors
and speculation rather than concrete evidence.

The trial of Tom Robinson serves as a catalyst for Scout's moral development,
challenging her preconceived notions about good and evil. As she witnesses the town's
reaction to Atticus's defense of Robinson, Scout is forced to confront the reality that many of
Maycomb's residents are deeply prejudiced. Despite considering themselves "good," these
individuals are unwilling to extend fairness and compassion to their black neighbors. This
hypocrisy forces Scout to grapple with the realization that her community is not as virtuous
as she once believed.

Scout also learns to see the humanity in those she initially perceived as villains. Mrs.
Dubose, despite her abusive behavior towards the Finch family, is revealed to be a woman
struggling with morphine addiction who is determined to die with dignity. Atticus
emphasizes that every person, regardless of their outward demeanor, possesses a sense of
dignity that deserves recognition and respect. Similarly, Boo Radley, initially seen as a
menacing figure, becomes Scout's savior when he protects her and Jem from Mr. Ewell. This
act challenges Scout's previous assumptions about Boo and leads her to recognize his
inherent goodness. By saving the children, Boo is portrayed as one of the novel's
"mockingbirds," a symbol of innocence and vulnerability.

Scout herself is portrayed as a morally complex character who is capable of both good
and bad. Despite not being malicious, she sometimes repeats racist slurs and beliefs she has
heard from others. However, as she matures, Scout begins to question her past behavior and
feel remorse for her treatment of Arthur Radley. This suggests that personal growth and
moral improvement are possible through experience, reflection, and maturity. Through
Scout's journey, the novel suggests that everyone is a mixture of good and evil and that it is
possible to become better over time.

Prejudice and Social Inequality

To Kill a Mockingbird meticulously examines various forms of prejudice prevalent in the

American South during the 1930s, including classism, sexism, and racism. The novel
underscores how prejudice leads to the stereotyping of individuals, enforces conformity, and
disregards individual merit. Prejudice, whether seemingly innocuous or overtly malicious, is
consistently depicted as misguided and harmful.

116 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

Racism is the most prominent form of prejudice explored in To Kill a Mockingbird. The
racial prejudice faced by Tom Robinson highlights the deep-seated inequality and injustice
within Maycomb society. Despite the lack of concrete evidence, Robinson is convicted based
solely on the color of his skin, illustrating the pervasive racism that permeates the town's
legal system and social fabric.

Sexism is another form of prejudice experienced by Scout, who chafes against societal
expectations that she conform to traditional gender roles. Scout resists attempts to force her
into acting more like a "lady," preferring overalls to dresses and rejecting stereotypical
notions of femininity. While not equivalent to racism, the sexism Scout encounters helps her
recognize the absurdity of prejudice in general. Despite her own experiences with sexism,
Scout occasionally expresses sexist views, demonstrating how anyone can harbor prejudiced
beliefs.

Classism is evident in the social hierarchy of Maycomb, where a person's financial

situation and family history determine their social standing. Aunt Alexandra, embodies this
class prejudice when she forbids Scout from associating with Walter Cunningham because of
his family's poverty. Scout recognizes the unfairness of this prejudice, seeing that Walter is
no different from her and deserves respect and kindness.

The novel illustrates how prejudice operates within the community of Maycomb. The
townspeople's hostility towards Atticus for defending Tom Robinson reveals the depth of
their racial prejudice. Scout and Jem endure abuse for their father's actions, highlighting the
social consequences of challenging the town's racist norms. Atticus argues that the
prosecution's case relies on the racist assumption that all black men are dangerous rapists.

Through Scout's experiences, the novel argues that overcoming prejudice is possible
through exposure, empathy, and understanding. Scout's gradual realization that judging
people based on their differences is futile and harmful leads her to question her prejudiced
thoughts about Boo Radley. By the end of the novel, Scout learns to appreciate Boo's
humanity, recognizing that he is not so different from herself. This suggests that as people
gain exposure to others who are different, they can move beyond prejudice and embrace a
more inclusive worldview.

Courage

In To Kill a Mockingbird, the concept of courage is explored and redefined, contrasting

conventional notions of strength with a more profound understanding of moral fortitude.

117 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

Initially, Scout and Jem equate courage with physical strength and the willingness to fight for
one's beliefs. They admire those who can visibly demonstrate their capabilities, such as
farmers and shop owners, and view Atticus's profession as a lawyer as less tangible and
impressive.

The encounter with the rabid dog challenges Scout and Jem's perception of Atticus's
courage. When Atticus is forced to shoot the dog, his children realize that he possesses the
ability to act with strength, but chooses not to unless necessary. Atticus encourages Scout to
resist fighting those who taunt her for his defense of Tom Robinson, teaching her that true
courage lies in taking the moral high ground rather than resorting to physical violence.

Atticus's decision to defend Tom Robinson, despite knowing the likely outcome,
exemplifies the novel's redefined notion of courage. He insists on doing what is right, even
when faced with opposition and the knowledge of potential failure. Atticus explains to Scout
that courage means standing up for what is right, regardless of the consequences. Scout
witnesses a different form of courage when she observes how being a lady means maintaining
poise and civility in the face of emotional turmoil.

The attempted murder of Scout and Jem by Mr. Ewell further illustrates the contrast
between true courage and cowardly actions. Mr. Ewell's attempt to harm children is
depicted as a despicable act, while Boo Radley's selfless intervention to save the children
represents genuine courage. Boo's willingness to leave his house after 25 years demonstrates
that true courage involves acting in service of the greater good, even when it causes personal
distress.

The novel suggests that courage is not about seeking immediate victories but about
playing the long game. While there are times when courage involves acting with strength, it
should only occur in times of great need and in service of the greater good. To Kill a
Mockingbird ultimately proposes that courage is about making the right choices, even when
they are difficult or unpopular, and about standing up for what is just, regardless of the
outcome.

118 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho

119 | Bhagwan tumharesaathho