BACKGROUND

Stroke is an acute health condition that affects patients and leaves long term
disabilities, financial and economic impacts, causing many role changes. The main
impact of the patients after may lead to changes in the quality of life due to the
physical, social, spiritual, and psychological challenges that experience [5].
With the 15 million new stroke cases worldwide [6]. Stroke is the main leading
cause of disability and death globally and particularly in low and middle-income
countries, so stroke is becoming a priority for many health care systems in these
countries, and this burden is increasing [7,8].
The incidence of stroke in developed countries have been declined dramatically
despite an aging population, however, there are an increasing number of stroke
patients in the young age group [9].
Rukan et al. (2019) conducted a 2-year prospective study of stroke characteristic
in the middle east and North Africa, they found that patients are slightly younger,
and they had a high rate of comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and slightly
more ischemic stroke severity, commonly of atherosclerotic or microvascular
etiology, so there is a high demand to admit the patients to stroke units and
rehabilitation units to be improved [7].
Stroke with younger patients has a long-lasting impact and profound effect
comparing with elderly patients with stroke, which is due to the major physical
impairment that alters their job during the most effective period in their lives.
Moreover, Stroke with young patients is associated with a high risk of increased
suicide attempts, anxiety, depression, lifelong cognitive impairment, and increased
mortality as well [9].
Rehabilitation is extremely important hence the amount of people who are suffering
and dying from the complication of stroke is increasing after a stroke has
happened, there are many options are available to start rehabilitation such as is
acute, post- acute, inpatient and outpatient [10]. Many factors affecting the
choice of rehabilitation settings, but there are major differences among patients ’
outcomes after rehabilitation, whether socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and
location of the residency will affect the patients and their families to choose the
best rehabilitation settings [11].
Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation is necessary needed for individuals to achieve
maximal recovery for the associated defects after stroke. Inpatient stroke
rehabilitation is the place of choice for patients who are at risk of chronic
physical, psychological, functional, social disability [10]. Patients with stroke
who will be treated as an Inpatient will receive comprehensive multidisciplinary
care and patient-centered care that aim to maximize patients' abilities and make an
individualized care plan to meet each patient's needs [12].
In the past 2 decades, researches related to nursing rehabilitation and especially
stroke rehabilitation and the role of the nurse in the rehabilitation process has
been increased dramatically. Those new studies have to change the perception, and
gives new insight to the nature of the nurses in the stroke
rehabilitation units, and how we can expand and refine the role of the nurses in
rehabilitation settings [4,13,14].
Many attempts have been done to identify the role of the nurses in the Inpatient
stroke rehabilitation units, they concluded that nurses are involved as an
essential part of the rehabilitation process, however, their contribution to
improving patient's outcomes is poorly understood and refined [1,4,15].
Nurses have a major role in health care systems, especially in providing the
evidence base care for stroke patients in rehabilitation settings. Nurses who are
dealing with inpatient stroke rehabilitation units need to pass specific
neurological competencies that cover the general neurologic knowledge and
experience [16,17].
Nursing rehabilitation contribution with stroke patients has been studied by many
researchers in the past [4,18,19] they have reported that the contribution of the
nurses in that time was essential but unfortunately therapeutically not specific,
and their input in the rehabilitation journey tend to be quiet passive and less
important [20]. Moreover, nurses interventions in related to work with stroke
patients require more investigation on the nature of these actions that performed
by nurses individually in collaboration with other multidisciplinary team members,
and how the nurses understand and deliver these interventions, other studies
referred that nurses contribution in rehabilitation was not specifically related to
organization and professional factors that limiting the nurse's interventions and
collaborations with other multidisciplinary team members [3,15,21].
Despite that nurses express their intention to integrate therapy and its outcome on
patients Daily activity living practices, but achieving that goal is a challenge
for them in fact, these efforts which are taken by nurses should be empowered and
encouraged by another multidisciplinary team to reflect that on patients functional
recovery rather than physical recovery [12,17,22].
In 1997, Kirekevold concluded four main therapeutic roles of the rehabilitation
nurses in addition to the coordination and management during hospitalization period
for stroke patients. The therapeutic roles were; interpretative, consoling,
conserving, and integrative function [4]. After decades of discussion about the
four main therapeutic roles of the rehabilitation nurses in stroke units, [23]
Kirekevold extended his theory, he concluded that the proposed four main
therapeutic roles for nurses which were created on 1997 still adequate, however,
the future nursing rehab role should also be developed to adapt with the post-
discharge needs and the emerging rehabilitation services and technologies,
moreover, nurses they have to clear and specify their specific bedside care and
interventions [23].
Clark (2014), conducted a meta ethnographic and systematic review study to derive
whether the theoretical framework which was invented by Kirevold in 1997 still
adequate to describe the nurse's contribution in the stroke rehabilitation units
and to find if there is any evolution in the nurse's rehab role since that date.
Clark concluded that the four main tasks of nursing rehabilitation are still
considered the central aspects of the nursing rehabilitation role, however many
emerging issues
Int J Phys Med Rehabil, Vol.8 Iss.5 No:1000563
2
Hajaj AMA
reflecting in the development of the nurse's contribution and responsibilities
after stroke, he referred those changes are related to patient and family
engagement in the rehabilitation, increasing the supporting the rehabilitation
efforts which is conducted on the patient's environment and supporting the role of
the interdisciplinary teamwork [4].
In another hand, Theofanidis (2016) studied the nursing interventions on patients
in stroke rehabilitation units, he implemented many interventions to highlight the
role of the nurse in stroke rehabilitation units, he concluded that nurses should
be aware of the new modalities of stroke management, in which some have as
advantages and some have disadvantages, that may enhance fast patients recovery and
ensure faster reintegration to their communities. He reported that nurses' role in
nursing rehabilitation is very important, and the nurses are considered as a key
player in the big multidisciplinary rehabilitation team [24].
Loft et al. (2019) Conducted a study to describe patients experience after stroke
rehabilitation and to explore the role of the nurses in the stroke rehabilitation
unit, the result was showed that the patients were worried about their future, and
they reported that they need more human support and contact from nurses, moreover
they described nurses as helpful and polite, but their role in their rehabilitation
was unclear, and they are not therapeutics as other MDT members, so nurses have to
present themselves as a stakeholder and more therapeutics for patients, and nurses
should have more training to know how to formulate meaningful and therapeutic goals
for patients [22].
Despite extensive literature that addressed the role of the nursing in stroke
rehabilitation units, still there are lack a of research studies that specify the
contribution of nurses in stroke rehabilitation settings.
AIM
This study aims to explore Nurses beliefs, attitudes and perception related to work
in inpatient stroke rehabilitation Unit.
METHODS Design
The data were collected by using a semi-structured interview, and this study is an
example of hermeneutic phenomenology, a qualitative approach that is concerned with
the life world or human experience as it is lived. The focus is toward illuminating
details and seemingly trivial aspects within the experience that may be taken for
granted in our lives, to create meaning and achieve a sense of understanding by
using open-ended questions to explore more the experience while working in stroke
rehab units
The interview was recorded and started with major open-ended questions then the
major themes will be transcribed for thematic analysis.
Major Question to have open-ended questions:
•Please share your experience with inpatient stroke rehabilitation patients??
•What are your major roles as a rehabilitation nurse with inpatient stroke
rehabilitation patients??
• What are the main challenges to your job??
•How you can describe your role in comparing with other
rehabilitation team members??
•What are your suggestions to improve the overall nursing
rehabilitation role in-patient stroke Unit??
Settings
Qatar Rehabilitation Institute (QRI) - Hamad Medical Corporation in Doha, Qatar, is
the region’s largest tertiary rehabilitation hospital, providing world class
integrated rehabilitation services and the most technologically advanced patient-
centered care. QRI offers five main rehabilitation programs - Stroke, Spinal Cord
Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury Pediatric Rehabilitation Pain Management. It is a
tertiary care facility, which offers inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation
services. The overall capacity of 193 beds [25].
Sampling
12 nurses met the including criteria and attended the Interview (5 Female, and 7
male). The average mean seniority is 10 years within the range of 8 to 21 years of
experience and means the age of 33 years.
Inclusion criteria
1-Nurses with a minimum of 1-year experience with inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
2-Staff Nurses only.
Exclusion criteria
1-Less than 1-year experience with inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
2-Diploma Nurses will be excluded.
Data collection and ethical consideration
After getting the IRB from Medical Research Center. Approval No (01-19-148). Email
sent to all staff Nurses who work in Inpatient stroke rehabilitation units in QRI.
Information letters outlining the study have been mailed. Purposive sampling type
(Experts) to explore valid experiences.12 Nurses replied to the email, and
Interview arranged on the morning shift in a private and quiet room to minimize
interruptions. The interview time approximately not exceeded 90 minutes. The
interview was semi-structured open-ended questions. The questions were arranged
based on the literature reviews which are relevant to the nursing rehabilitation
[3,14, 23].
Audio recorded used, and stored privately in a locked room and no one has access.
Assurance of anonymity and confidentiality will be given. The records and the
transcribing will be kept and saved according to the Hamad Medical Corporation
policy.
Int J Phys Med Rehabil, Vol.8 Iss.5 No:1000563
3

Hajaj AMA Data analysis

Thematic and pattern analysis based on coding by using content analysis [26-28],
both deductive and inductive approach has been used. The theory of Kirekevold
(2010) has been used at the main reference for nursing rehabilitation in stroke
units, and all new ideas and concepts are kept open [23].
RESULTS
Two main categories were identified; the experience of nurses in Stroke
rehabilitation units and the challenges in nursing contribution in stroke units,
and the recommended strategies to enhance the role of the nurses in stroke rehab
units.
The Experience of Nurses in Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Unit
Nurses expressed their positive feelings regards receiving stroke patients after
acute injury and start the rehabilitation journey, nurses are enjoying while
helping the patients to restore their functional capabilities and do his daily
activity level independently as can as possible, and to restore their routine life
as usual with modifications, and to work with patient and families to facilitate
reintegration to community and work as before.
“Happiness is to see acutely injured patients after stroke is getting well and
being able to walk, and do his daily activity living independently as can as
possible "Nurse 1.
“Putting a smile on patient’s face is a reward of nurses in stroke rehabilitation
units” Nurse 2
Nurses feel that their input in stroke rehabilitation is very crucial in inpatient
stroke rehabilitation unit, regardless the challenges they are encountering, but
they expressed their role is very effective .Nurses believe that they are the heart
of the rehabilitation units, and they are the closest health care providers for
patients and their families.
“I am proud to be a stork rehab nurse, I can make a changes on patients’ lives”
Nurse 1
"My role is to support patients day by day, to let them being able, and going home
safe" Nurse 3
Nurses are dealing with each patient as a unique person with unique needs, so they
are proving high-quality services that focus on individuality and patient and
family engagement, patient- centered care, with an individualized care plan that
addresses the holistic care approach and dealing with the patient as a whole, not
only focusing on the physical aspects.
"More patient and family engagement, more outcomes, fast recovery, more
satisfaction, less complication, fast discharge" Nurse 4
"I am treating each one, my patient, like a special person, special needs, “I am
trying my best to let him feel that he is special "Nurse 5
"Stroke rehabilitation is a way of life, so helping the patients to restore his
body and soul together on same time” Nurse 1
The challenges of nurses in stroke rehabilitation unit
The diverted role of nurses in stroke rehab units from opacity to clarity
Nurses’ perception of working in stroke units varied from vague to clear with no
confusion or overlapping. However, they mostly referred their work in stroke
rehabilitation as a complex job, multifactorial task, working with everyone, and
dealing with everything.
The majority reported that their daily work is a routine work that encompasses
which is not limited to daily assessment for patients, providing the basic care
needs for patients, educating the patients and their families about their daily
updates on their conditions, being an advocate for them, providing psychological
and emotional support, marinating a normal and stable function, preventing
complication and finally working with the patient and their families to reintegrate
the learned new skills and on their daily activity living activities, and preparing
them for a safe discharge from the first day of admission.
Some nurses reported that their role is not clear, and confusing, even the patient
and their families they don’t identify exactly what is the role of the nurses in
comparing to other MDT members.
"Nurses have a deeper relationship with patients and their families, however, they
trust and rely on them more" Nurse 11
"Our patients showed respect and appreciation for us, however, they give more
recognition to physicians and therapies because they are directly managing their
immediate disabilities with daily interventions and activities" Nurse 7
"Patients focus is mainly the physical concern, rather than the routine care needs"
Nurse 8
Nurses work as a coordinator and collaborator with everyone and having in idea
about everything, but some of them reported that their work in stroke
rehabilitation is a conservative role rather than therapeutic role, they are
following other MDT recommendations how to handle patents and how to feed them and
how to rehabilitate their bowel and bladder, etc.
The role confusion with some nurses leads them to handle unnecessary tasks that
burden their role as a therapeutic team member and add more stress and time
consuming that limit patient contact time such as secretary, collecting data for
quality departments, attending some meetings, preparing for some events and
conferences, following the material with stores, keeping more time with the
computer
"I am handling many extra tasks in my unit, and I am collecting data for such
projects and that limit my patient contact time" Nurse 10
Inadequate staffing and lack of time
Inadequate staffing is a challenge for nurses everywhere, but nurses in stroke
rehabilitation units showed more concern about staffing, hence they are giving
patient-centered care which encompasses treating the person as a unique person with
a special need, which need more time for patients especially for acutely ill
patients who are transferred to a stroke rehabilitation
Int J Phys Med Rehabil, Vol.8 Iss.5 No:1000563
4

Hajaj AMA
unit and need more medical management, or patients who are at high risk for fall or
patients who are having some appointment in other clinics or hospitals, or patients
who are having some procedures like Botox injection.
"Sometimes I am receiving difficult patient which affect my other patients care and
result in a delay in their needs" Nurse 11
"When are having an admission and discharge at the same time, that makes our units
busy, and that affects the patient contact time" Nurse 5
Lack of time for nurses in stroke unit especially on afternoon hours and evening
hours, when the staff to patient ratio is decreased, which will impair the quality
of care that nurses are offering, since the workload is a bit less on afternoon and
evening, but still patients still need an immediate response for their needs.
Lack of adequate staffing and time for nurses who are working in stroke
rehabilitation units will affect the professional development for nurses in the
stroke rehabilitation unit, and explain why nurse's role is not clear and for
nurses, patients, and other multidisciplinary team members.
Nurses’ endorsement and assessment
Nurses' endorsement in stroke rehabilitation units is focusing more on the physical
and medical concerns for the patients such as (Vital signs, medication new orders,
fluid and electrolyte, falling risk assessment, pressure injury, dysphagia
assessment, etc.) rather than the progress for patients from a rehabilitation
perspective.
"My endorsement is mainly on the patients’ daily updates, I am happy to endorse my
patient quiet and all his needs are met" Nurse 12
There are limited communication and endorsement about rehabilitation and functional
abilities between nurses and other disciplines updates due to limited time and
patient overload “Nurse 7
There is a lack of nurse assessment scales in stroke rehabilitation units that
incorporate more understanding of the holistic approach of the patients comparing
with other therapies. Nurses are having a few scales that assess the patient if he
is on risk for falls or developing pressure injury, pain assessment, and swallowing
assessment. All of those both scales are valid and reliable for general nurse
units, however, it's not enough to assess the complexity of patients in stroke
rehabilitation units, while stroke rehabilitation unit is a specialized unit with
the special patient and special needs, all of this will affect the quality of care
for patients and professional development of nurses rehabilitation and minimize the
role of the nurses in stroke rehabilitation units.
“Our assessment in stroke rehabilitation unit is mainly focusing on some aspects,
but we lack an advanced assessment tool that reflects the complexity of patients in
the stroke rehabilitation unit, and supporting the contribution of nurses in stroke
rehabilitation units in comparing with other therapies assessment" Nurse 8
Lack of specific and advanced nursing rehabilitation education and competencies
Nurses reported that they have attended many educational activities during their
work in stroke rehabilitation units such as Foundation course in rehabilitation and
a lot of intensive in- service education, however, the majority stressed that their
education is broad and not giving them a clear understanding of the specific role
of the nurse in stroke rehabilitation units, and they miss the hands-on skills
training to cover the patients’ needs during their Journey in stroke rehabilitation
units.
"We need hands-on skills rather than theoretical lectures that incorporates the
clear role of nurses in a stroke rehabilitation unit" Nurse 1
"We are having a hard time with the new staffs, all new staffs should attend more
specific and advanced courses to cover the complexity of patients in the unit"
Nurse 7
However, Nurses are striving to provide the best care to meet the complexity of
patients who are admitted in the stroke rehabilitation unit, nurses reported that
were not confident enough to specify their roles in dealing with difficult patients
and major complications after stroke such as cognitively impaired patients,
patients with post-stroke depression, sexual dysfunction, spasticity management,
contractures, global aphasia, and they referred that to the lack of specific and
advanced education, competencies, skills to meet the complexity of patients in
stroke rehab units.
To meet the evolving role of the nurses in stroke rehabilitation units, nurse
educators and other stakeholders should review the curriculum and competencies in
collaboration with academic institute, some accreditation and certification bodies
and some experts people in the field to prepare specific and advances
rehabilitation courses that expand and support the role of nurses and to find a
strategy how to manage the evolving issues in stroke rehabilitation units and
empower the nurses with the knowledge and competencies to strengthen the structure
of the nursing rehabilitation contribution in the stroke rehabilitation units.
Lack of comprehensive nursing rehabilitation documentation toolkit
Many hospitals are using computerized health care systems and Qatar is one of the
countries using health care systems in all their facilities. Nurses are providing a
24 hours bedside care for stroke rehabilitation units, Documentation is important
for nurses, it works as evidence that their work and intervention, education was
provided safely on time.
Nurses reported that despite having a computerized care system, but there is lack
of standardized documentation toolkit that cover the main elements of comprehensive
rehabilitation assessment, individualized care plans, patient and family
engagement, functional improvement, patient and family education, patient
compliance, challenges, queries, outcomes, a discharge planning updates, patient
readiness for discharge, and patient and family satisfaction.
Int J Phys Med Rehabil, Vol.8 Iss.5 No:1000563
5

Hajaj AMA
"Nursing documentation varies between nurses if there is a unified structure for
the nurses that expands the role of the nurses in stroke rehabilitation units"
Nurse 5
Nursing documentation in stroke rehabilitation units should define the quality of
assessment and incorporate basic and advanced nursing care plans to cover the
complexity of patients and, and reflect the findings on their documentation and
find a strategy to specify the role of the nurse in this achievement, and do
monitoring how to follow this achievement after discharge.
Technology and assistive devices and nurses
Nurses reported that much new advanced treatment is taking place in treating stroke
rehabilitation. A combination of two or more new technologies may be beneficial
such as using assistive devices, splints, orthotics, injection of Botulinum Toxin,
Baclofen Injection pumps, participation in constrained induced training and virtual
reality activities.
Nurse’s interactions between the new technology and assistive devices add a
challenge for nurses particularly in using and dealing with these new modalities
and shaping their skills and providing evidence-based practices for their patients.
Those new modalities will add more burden on the nurse's contribution in stroke
rehabilitation management hence some of these modalities will be kept with the
patient for the rest of day after finishing his exercise in the gym, which
encompass that nurses have to be competent and qualified to educate and deal with
this new equipment, and to reflect their efficiency on the functional level on
daily use.
“A lot of new modalities has been used with patient nowadays, but I am not sure how
to handle and manage and how to document the effect of those modalities on patient
outcomes” Nurse 12
"There is s shared responsibility between therapies and nurses how to deal with the
new equipment, but I didn't receive the training to handle this kind of equipment"
Nurse 4
Nurses are happy about implementing new modalities in stroke rehabilitation units.
Mostly they reported that implanting new modalities is a challenge for them and
they are not actively involved in the decision how that new modalities are relevant
to their conditions, and to how extent this new treatment is successful and
beneficial for them.
Limited involvement in the decision making
Despite nurses have reported the importance of their job for the patient and other
MDT members, however, they stressed that they had limited involvement in the
decision making in Multidisciplinary meetings. They feel that their contribution to
such meetings is limited in terms of planning, putting smart goals, and achieving
outcomes, discharge order, referral, treatment modalities, and length of stay.
Multidisciplinary team members are addressing nurses with very basic care needs
such as vital signs, abnormal findings, urine and bowel incontinence, psychological
aspects, patient, and family needs. So, Nurses feel sometimes that their
contribution is subordinate and other team members will devalue the role of the
nurses in the management of stroke patients, and they
believe that nurses' role is secondary and treating them superior and they devalue
the role of nurses comparing to their roles.
"I am doing a great job with my patient, but my contribution to the treatment plan
is limited, they mainly focused on bowel and bladder incontinence and any abnormal
findings on the patient" Nurse 1
"I feel devalued from another rehabilitation team about the contribution of nurses
with patients "Nurse 7
"There is a poor endorsement from therapies about daily patients in terms of
holistic rehabilitation approach, which limit my patient progress in my daily care"
Nurse 3
"We are guided by doctors and therapies recommendations, we are like Puzzle" Nurse
3
Nurses reported that they have little communication with other team members about
kind of treatment and exercise modalities and patient progress in terms of
functional abilities, which will limit the nurse's skills to integrate the
rehabilitation progress on their daily care.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study showed more insight, more scientific and updated
understanding about nurse's role in the stroke rehabilitation unit, with more
focused on the experience of the nurses their challenges and their recommendations
to highlight and support their role.
Nurses expressed their positive feeling in terms of working in the stroke
rehabilitation unit, they are enjoying helping the patients being independent on
themselves, and being discharged home with less pain and complications, and to be
reintegrated to his community, social life as can as possible, however, all
challenges in their work. The findings were in line with the all previous studies
that address the nurse's role in stroke rehabilitation unit [17,23,29].
In contrast, nurses reported that their role is diverted from opacity to clarity,
some nurses reported that there is no perceived conflict about their role, they
mentioned that their role is adapting with the patient needs and they are doing
their job as routine daily care for all patients with consideration to patient-
centered care approach, while others reported that their role is confusing and not
specific and they are just providing general nursing care, and working with
everything and everywhere with no clear roles and responsibilities. These findings
are already reported by previous studies that nurses are striving for visibility
and to have a clear role and responsibility [3,14,30].
Nurses gave more focus on their challenges in stroke rehabilitation that burden
their contribution in comparing with other rehabilitation team members, this study
explored detailed challenges and some recommendations to improve the
professionalism of nursing rehabilitation.
Inadequate staffing and lack of time is a major concern for all nurses worldwide,
but nurses who are working in stroke rehabilitation units who are providing a
patient-centered care interventions and managing the complexity of stroke patients
will have the challenge to meet all patient's needs, some nurses
Int J Phys Med Rehabil, Vol.8 Iss.5 No:1000563
6

Hajaj AMA
refereed that to the type of patients and their acuity and their level of
participation and engagement with the rehabilitation team, following the practice
guidelines, these findings are most relevant with other studies that [24,31,32].
Despite nurses are doing a 24 hours bedside care, collaborating with the team
members in rehabilitation, however, they lack the advanced assessment scales to
assess the holistic assessment and review the complexity of patients in stroke
rehabilitation units and review the functional progress of the patient and how they
will apply that in their daily practices. Nurses reported that their assessment is
focused on the general patient needs while the other disciplines have specific
tools to manage the complicity of stroke patients in stroke rehabilitation unit
which will give in- depth understanding and contribution for their role while
dealing with stroke patients in comparing with the nurses [24].
Nurses reported that their education and their competencies not reached the level
that they are capable to manage the complexity of the patients in terms of hands-on
skills and to manage the evolving issues in rehabilitation in comparison to other
rehabilitation members. The acuity of patients in stroke rehabilitation units
become more challenging, so nurses have to be educated and equipped to manage the
complexity of stroke patients such in terms of cognitive rehabilitation, sexual
rehabilitation, functional abilities, aqua therapy, spasticity management, post-
stroke depression, contractures, aphasia, new medications, and their effect.
Nurses strive to become more specialized and competent in stroke rehabilitation
units, nurses are trying to adopt a new model or framework to define their specific
areas and to equip nurses to be competent and safe handling stroke patients [33].
Many trials have been conducted to describe the competencies for rehabilitation
nursing, however, they found that nurses are not prepared and competent to manage
the complexity of patients in rehabilitating settings, which will limit their role
to provide high-quality services for their patients, and support the role of the
nurses in stroke rehabilitation units [33-36].
Nurses reported that despite having a computerized care system that facilitates
their documentation, but nurses who are working in stroke rehabilitation units
referred that one of the factors that burden their role and minimize the
contribution of nurses in stroke rehabilitation units is lack of standardized
documentation toolkit that guide nurses to specify their role in many aspects such
as psychological, social, mental, spiritual, sexual rehabilitation, aphasia
management, and the cover the complexity of patients and their needs, and to help
the nurses especially the new nurses to specify their role.
Nurses documentation in rehabilitation units is missing the evidence how nurses are
providing care 24 hours a day and they are missing the ongoing monitoring, and
patient responses, patient progress, patient engagement in the rehabilitation
process, identifying the comorbidities and nurses lack the ongoing functional
assessment for stroke rehabilitation patients, and lack the appropriate
interventions that help nurses achieve the rehabilitation goals. No clear
documentation adds more burden and a challenge on nursing rehabilitation
contribution in stroke rehabilitation units [31,36,37].
Assistive devices in rehabilitation are widely used in stroke rehabilitation to
maximize the patient's capabilities, improve quality of life, and reintegrate
patients to their usual life as possible [38-40]. Many factors are affecting
utilization of assistive devices in stroke rehabilitation, which are not limited to
a budget of the health organizations and the need for patients for positive
outcomes in terms of successful implementation and integration to their clinical
environments [40-42].
Although assistive devices are widely used in stroke rehabilitation units by
nurses, however, little research has been conducted to check the accurate
comprehension of nurse ’ s knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to proper
implementation of those techniques and the impact of utilization on the functional
outcomes of patients during their hospitalization in stroke rehabilitation units
[32,43].
Kanaskie and Snyder conducted a qualitative study to investigate the decision
making of nurses related to use assistive devices in handling and transfer of a
patient in rehabilitation units, the results revealed many barriers for nurses to
apply such these new technologies such as knowledge and skills how to apply those
modalities in nursing care, plus the unit culture is a big barrier for
implementation, also, perceived risk and harm to the patient and for nurses
themselves as well, and they concluded that care needs more collaboration between
rehabilitation team to proper implementation of new technology to ensure better
outcomes in rehabilitation.
Our results were compatible with many studies that Nurses' involvement in the
decision-making process for patients in stroke rehabilitation units is very poor,
nurses are feeling subordinated and not valued, and they reported that their
contribution to rehabilitation decisions is devalued compared to other roles. They
feel that their contribution in such meetings is limited in terms of planning,
putting smart goals, and achieving outcomes, discharge order, referral, treatment
modalities, and length of stay [32,44,45].
Many studies have reported that nursing decision making in rehabilitation settings
is a collaborative decision process, which means that patients, families, and the
rest of rehabilitation teams have an equal contribution [46]. Nurses decision
making in rehabilitation setting require strong expertise, high competencies,
advanced knowledge, and the ability to adopt set of patients values and needs plus
understand the risk behind taken some decisions, and the ability to manage in case
the decisions were not effective and not valid [47].
Our results are in parallel with many studies to check nurses involved in the
decision making in rehabilitation settings, Clarke 2014, conducted a systematic
review to identify the framework for nursing rehabilitation in stroke
rehabilitation units, she found that nursing involvement in management stroke in
rehabilitation units was very limited, she found that nursing rehabilitation
services contingent on the nursing time available plus the adequate of staffs in
the shift. There is a separation between nursing staff and therapy work. She
reported that nursing education and skills are not consistent or systematic manner
to manage the complexity of patients which will affect the role of nurses in stroke
rehabilitation units and add
Int J Phys Med Rehabil, Vol.8 Iss.5 No:1000563
7

Hajaj AMA
confusion for patients' families and therapies about the core value of nursing
contribution in stroke rehabilitation management [3].
Nurses in stroke rehabilitation units are working hard with patients and families
to ensure the best care is provided. Nurses decision making in the stroke
rehabilitation process is a dynamic process that includes incorporating all team
recommendations to reflects that on patients outcomes, however, nurses need to
restructure the decision making to make sound decisions and to be more independent
and self-ref lective to be more therapeutically effective to patients and their
families to develop the contribution of nurses in the stroke rehabilitation units.
CONCLUSION
The study provided evidence that nurses believe in themselves as effective team
members in stroke rehabilitation, and they are enjoying while helping patients to
recover to allow them to reintegrate and adapt to their new life situations.
However the study highlights the main nursing obstacles in stroke rehabilitation
units that make nursing role is a challenge and affect the contribution of nurses
in stroke rehabilitation units; nurses perception about their role varied from
clarity to opacity, but the majority believe that their role is complex job since
you have to do with everyone and doing everything. Inadequate staffing and lack of
time is a challenge for nurses everywhere, but due to the special needs for
patients in stroke rehabilitation units, this is adding more burden on the
complexity of the nurse's load. Nurse’s endorsement is focusing on the physical
aspects only with little attention to a holistic approach and endorsement. Lack of
specific and advanced educational activities to prepare nurses to meet the
patient's needs in stroke rehabilitation units, all research studies which were
done before have focused on the importance to modify and transform the educational
activities for nurses to equip them to handle the complexity of patients. Lack of
documentation toolkit to guide nurses on how to ref lect their contribution to
stork rehabilitation units is one of the main challenges that reflect the
disparities between nurses' documentation in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Nurses
have to be more competent in handling the revolution in the assistive devices that
have recently used to manage the complexity of patients' needs. Limited involvement
of nurses in the decision making in stroke rehabilitation adds a lot of
psychological impact on the nurse that lets them feel that their role is little
sign in comparison with other disciplines.
RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE
Nursing rehabilitation still strives for visibility for many decades, all previous
studies have failed to rearticulate the theoretical and practical framework to
transform the nursing rehabilitation model in clinical practice. Nurses confront
the same challenges which are found by other studies. Nursing contribution in
stroke rehabilitation units should be clearer and stronger, nurse’s role in stroke
rehabilitation units should not be limited to meet the physical aspects of the
patients, and nurses have to be more independent and confident in terms of
assessment and planning and intervention evaluating and to reflect that on the
patient functional outcomes. I believe that the current scope of
nursing rehabilitation is very limited and nurses have to create and adopt a new
framework to transform the current theoretical and clinical scope of the role of
the nurses in stroke rehabilitation units.
Nurses have to adopt new knowledge and competencies in collaboration with other
disciplines such as occupational therapies, physical therapy, and speech therapy,
to upgrade their assessment and intervention that enable the nurses to provide
systematic and therapeutic feedback about the patient progress and the proper
interventions that needed to reflects that on the functional abilities on
discharge.
Nurses’ leaders have to adopt new strategies to equip nurses who are working in
rehabilitation settings to ensure that they are capable to handle the complexity of
patients in stroke rehabilitation units. I do suggest that cross-training between
nurses and other disciplines is very essential to orient the nurses about other
disciplines' roles, assessment tools, intervention, and follow up plans. Providing
specific and advanced training courses that address the hands-on skills will help
the nurses to identify the importance of their role and let the other disciplines
recognize that nurses' input is valid, and their involvement in clinical decision
making is very essential.
Future nursing rehabilitation studies are recommended to articulate the evolving
role of nursing rehabilitation in stroke units, and to be cope and adapt with the
post-discharge needs and the emerging rehabilitation services and technologies,
moreover, nurses they have to clear and specify their specific bedside care and
interventions.
LIMITATIONS
This study was conducted in one place in Qatar, with a limited participant number.
All study participants are bachelor's degrees so all Diploma nurses were exempted,
so another study has to identify the diploma nurses' perceptions about working in
stroke rehabilitation units and the difference between the role of Bachelor's
degree nurse and diploma nurses. This study investigated the role of the nurses in
inpatient stroke rehabilitation units only, however, nurses are working with stroke
patients in acute hospitals, outpatients, daycare rehabilitation, nursing homes,
and long-term facilities, and their role should be investigated to enrich the role
of the nurses in stroke rehabilitation units in General. So, it is therefore
important to acknowledge that all these limitations should be considered to draw a
conclusion and generalize the study results.
REFERENCES
1. Tyrrell EF, Levack WM, Ritchie LH, Keeling SM. Nursing contribution to the
rehabilitation of older patients: Patient and family perspectives. J Adv Nurs.
2012;68(11): 2466-2476.
2. Kraut JC. Rehabilitation in the home: An exploration of attitudes, perceptions
and beliefs of referrers, consumers and service providers, University of Western
Australia Australia. 2012.
3. Clarke DJ. Nursing practice in stroke rehabilitation: Systematic
Int J Phys Med Rehabil, Vol.8 Iss.5 No:1000563
8
review and 1201-1226.
meta ‐ ethnography.
J Clin Nurs.
2014;23(9-10):

Hajaj AMA
4. Kirkevold M. The role of nursing in the rehabilitation of acute stroke patients:
Toward a unified theoretical perspective. Adv Nurs Sci. 1997;19(4): 55-64.
5. Mairami FF, Warren N, Allotey PA, Mak JS, Reidpath DD. Documenting the impact of
stroke in a middle-income country: A Malaysian case study. Disabil Rehabil.
2020;42(1): 102-113.
6. Feigin VL, Mensah GA, Norrving B, Murray CJL, Roth GA. Atlas of the global
burden of stroke (1990-2013): the GBD 2013 study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):
230-236.
7. Krishnamurthi RV, Ikeda T, Feigin VL. Global, Regional and Country-Specific
Burden of Ischaemic Stroke, Intracerebral Haemorrhage and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage:
A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Neuroepidemiology
2020;54(2): 171-179.
8. Rukn SA, Mazya MV, Hentati F, Sassi SB, Nabli F, Said Z, et al. Stroke in the
Middle-East and North Africa: A 2-year prospective observational study of stroke
characteristics in the region-Results from the Safe Implementation of Treatments in
Stroke (SITS)– Middle-East and North African (MENA). Int J Stroke. 2019;14(7): 715-
722.
9. Tibæk M, Dehlendorff C, Jørgensen HS, Forchhammer HB, Johnsen SP, Kammersgaard
LP. Increasing incidence of hospitalization for stroke and transient ischemic
attack in young adults: A registry‐based study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(5):
e003158.
10. O'Brien SR. Trends in inpatient rehabilitation stroke outcomes before and after
advent of the prospective payment system: a systematic review. J Neurol Phys Ther.
2010;34(1): 17-23.
11. Smith E. Stroke Disparities in Rehabilitation. 2020.
12. Taleb S, Parker D, Durand A, Huynh M, Zhang X, Verduzco- Gutierrez M, et al.
Does Age Affect Functional Improvement in Stroke Patients During Inpatient
Rehabilitation?1530; Neurology. 2020;94: (S15).
13. Kamo T, Momosaki R, Suzuki K, Asahi R, Azami M, Ogihara H, et al. Effectiveness
of Intensive Rehabilitation Therapy on Functional Outcomes After Stroke: A
Propensity Score Analysis Based on Japan Rehabilitation Database. J Stroke
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28(9): 2537-2542.
14. Loft MI, Martinsen B, Esbensen BA, Mathiesen LL, Iversen HK, Poulsen I.
Strengthening the role and functions of nursing staff in inpatient stroke
rehabilitation: Developing a complex intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well- being. 2017;12(1): 1392218.
15. Barreca S, Wilkins S. Experiences of nurses working in a stroke rehabilitation
unit. J Adv Nurs. 2008;63(1): 36-44.
16. Buijck B, Ribbers G. The Challenges of Nursing Stroke Management in
Rehabilitation Centres. Springer. 2018.
17. Fang J. Effect of Neurology Nursing on Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients. J
Nurs. 2017;6(2).
18. Gibbon B. Implications for nurses in approaches to the management of stroke
rehabilitation: A review of the literature. Int J of nurs stud. 1993;30(2): 133-
141.
19. Kirkevold M. Practical knowledge embedded in the nursing care provided to
stroke patients. 1990.
20. Burton CR. A description of the nursing role in stroke rehabilitation. J Adv
Nurs. 2000;32(1): 174-181.
21. Brown CE. Nursing practice, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers to
evidence ‐ based practice at an academic medical center. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(2):
371-381.
22. Loft MI, Martinsen B, Esbensen BA, Mathiesen LL, Iversen HK, Poulsen I. Call
for human contact and support: An interview study exploring patients’ experiences
with inpatient stroke
rehabilitation and their perception of nurses’ and nurse assistants’
roles and functions. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(4): 396-404.
23. Kirkevold M. The role of nursing in the rehabilitation of stroke survivors: an
extended theoretical account. Adv Nurs Sci.
2010;33(1): E27-E40.
24. Theofanidis D. Nursing interventions and rehabilitation activities
for stroke patients. J Nurs Care. 2016;5: e131.
25. Madi L. Prescribing pattern of proton pump inhibitors in Qatar
rehabilitation institute: A retrospective study. J Research Pharmacy
Practice. 2019;8(2): 101.
26. Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using
content analysis. Nursing Plus Open. 2016;2: 8-14.
27. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv
Nurs. 2008;62(1): 107-115.
28. Vaismoradi M, Jones J, Turunen H, Snelgrove S. Theme
development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis.
J Nurs Educ Pract. 2016;6: 101-110.
29. Loft MI, Esbensen BA, Kirk K, Pedersen L, Martinsen B, Iversen
H, et al. Nursing staffs self-perceived outcome from a rehabilitation 24/7
educational programme – a mixed-methods study in stroke care. BMC nurs. 2018;17(1):
17.
30. Lawrence M, Campbell L. Nurse education needed to address uncertainties of role
and contribution in stroke rehabilitation units. Evid Based Nurs. 2018;21(2): 44.
31. Hentschke P. 24‐Hour Rehabilitation Nursing: The Proof Is in the Documentation.
Rehabil Nurs. 2009;34(3): 128-132.
32. Loft MI, Poulsen I, Esbensen BA, Iversen HK, Mathiesen LL, Martinsen B. Nurses’
and nurse assistants’ beliefs, attitudes and actions related to role and function
in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit-A qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2017;
26(23-24): 4905-4914.
33. Vaughn S, Mauk KL, Jacelon CS, Larsen PD, Rye J, Wintersgill W, et al. The
competency model for professional rehabilitation nursing. Rehabil Nurs. 2016;41(1):
33-44.
34. Lin SH, Neubeck L, Gallagher R. Educational preparation, roles, and
competencies to guide career development for cardiac rehabilitation nurses. J
Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017;32(3): 244-259.
35. Verma S, Paterson M, Medves J. Core competencies for health care professionals:
what medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, and physiotherapy share. J Allied
Health. 2006;35(2): 109-115.
36. Kelley TF, Brandon DH, Docherty SL. Electronic nursing documentation as a
strategy to improve quality of patient care. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2011;43(2): 154-162.
37. Staub MM, Needham I, Odenbreit M, Lavin MA, Achterberg TV. Improved quality of
nursing documentation: results of a nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes
implementation study. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2007;18(1): 5-17.
38. Bryant L, Bronwyn H, Benjamin B, Andrew B, Vincent N, Peter S, et al.
Opportunities for the Implementation of Immersive Virtual Reality in
Rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System
Sciences. 2020.
39. Chérrez-Ojeda I, Felix M, Mata VL, Vanegas E, Racines DS, Aguilar M, et al. Use
and perceptions of information and communication technologies among Ecuadorian
nurses: A cross- sectional study. The Open Nurs J. 2020;14(1): 8-17.
40. Zarit SH, Chiusano C, Harrison AS, Sewell A, Krause C, Yin Liu, et al.
Rehabilitation of persons with dementia: using technology to improve participation.
Aging Ment Health. 2020: 1-8.
41. Kanaskie ML, Snyder C. Nurses and nursing assistants decision- making regarding
use of safe patient handling and mobility technology: A qualitative study. Appl
Nurs Res. 2018;39: 141-147.
42. Sprong ME, Dallas B, Paul E, Xia M. Rehabilitation technology services and
employment outcomes among consumers using
Int J Phys Med Rehabil, Vol.8 Iss.5 No:1000563
9

Hajaj AMA
division of rehabilitation services. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol.
2019;14(5): 445-452.
43. Klingshirn H, Mittrach R, Braitmayer K, Strobl R, Bender A, Grill
E, et al. RECAPDOC-a questionnaire for the documentation of rehabilitation care
utilization in individuals with disorders of consciousness in long-term care in
Germany: development and pretesting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1): 329.
44. Hafsteinsdóttir TB, Varekamp R, Rensink M, Linge RV, Lindeman E, Schuurmans M,
et al. Feasibility of a nursing rehabilitation guideline for patients with stroke:
Evaluating the use by nurses. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(11): 939-949.
45. Mauk KL. The effect of advanced practice nurse ‐ modulated education on
rehabilitation nursing staff knowledge. Rehabil Nurs. 2013;38(2): 99-111.
46. Kaizer F, Spiridigliozzi AM, Hunt MR. Promoting shared decision- making in
rehabilitation: Development of a framework for situations when patients with
dysphagia refuse diet modification recommended by the treating team. Dysphagia.
2012;27(1): 81-87.
47. Wainwright SF, McGinnis PQ. Factors that influence the clinical decision-making
of rehabilitation professionals in long-term care settings. J Allied Health. 2009;
38(3): 143-151.