Macroeconomics Problem Set 3 Exercises
Uploaded by
Giorgia FantiniMacroeconomics Problem Set 3 Exercises
Uploaded by
Giorgia FantiniCommon questions
Powered by AIA decrease in firm capitalization leads banks to charge a higher risk premium (x), increasing the cost of borrowing (ρ = r + x). This higher cost reduces investment levels due to its increased expense, leading to a potential decrease in equilibrium output if the central bank does not adjust the nominal interest rate . The real interest rate effectively increases if the nominal rate is held constant, reducing investment even further by exacerbating the interest cost .
A shift in the IS curve could result from changes in expectations affecting investment, changes in tastes affecting consumption, or a policy-induced change in the interest rate . In contrast, shifts in the LM curve are often due to changes in the nominal money supply, changes in the demand for money resulting from variations in interest rates or income, or a change in the price level. These represent differing impacts where IS adjustments relate to real economy factors and LM adjustments relate to monetary dynamics .
A tax reduction causes the IS curve to shift right as disposable income rises, increasing consumption and demand. This leads to higher equilibrium output and potentially higher interest rates if demand for money increases due to higher income, moving the economy along the LM curve. However, if the resulting increase in money demand is not matched by a change in nominal supply, the LM might not shift, emphasizing the interconnected dynamics in fiscal policy within the IS-LM model .
As expected inflation rises, the real interest rate typically falls if the nominal policy rate set by the central bank remains constant. This is because the real interest rate is nominal interest rate minus expected inflation. Thus, with a constant nominal rate, a rise in expected inflation decreases the real rate, making borrowing cheaper and potentially stimulating investment .
When government spending cuts occur (e.g., G decreases from 400 to 340), equilibrium output initially falls, assuming interest rates remain constant. The central bank can respond by adjusting interest rates to return the economy to initial levels of income; if it lowers interest rates, investment might increase, compensating for the decrease in government spending . This monetary action neutralizes the contractionary fiscal effect to restore equilibrium.
To maintain constant output while increasing the interest rate, a contractionary monetary policy (such as reducing the money supply) could be paired with an expansionary fiscal policy (such as increasing government spending or cutting taxes). This situation would likely lead to a decrease in investment due to higher interest rates, and an increase in government spending and potentially consumption if disposable incomes rise due to tax cuts . As investment decreases with higher interest rates, government spending compensates to keep output constant.
When investment is not sensitive to interest rates, the IS curve becomes steeper because changes in interest rates have a smaller effect on investment and therefore output . This suggests that a lower interest rate changes aggregate demand more slowly, highlighting that fiscal policy might be more effective than monetary policy in influencing output. This condition implies that the LM curve might be flatter, indicating that liquidity preference is more sensitive to interest rate changes than is investment.
Expansionary fiscal policy, such as increased government spending, can be effective in maintaining equilibrium income when the central bank holds the nominal interest rate constant by directly boosting aggregate demand. However, if risk premiums have increased, which the central bank does not offset, investment might not fully recover, potentially limiting the policy's overall effectiveness in restoring both income and investment levels to their initial status .
An exogenous reduction in the price level with a fixed nominal money supply increases the real money supply, lowering the real interest rate. This occurs because the same nominal supply translates into a larger real supply, increasing liquidity and lowering the rate charged for borrowing. This effect highlights the balance between real and nominal variables in maintaining macroeconomic stability .
The interest rate negatively influences consumption because higher interest rates typically discourage spending and borrowing, especially for durable goods and investment, which implies that c2 in the consumption function is negative . This negative relationship implies that as the interest rate increases, consumption decreases, thereby affecting the slope of the IS curve by making it steeper .