Scribd
Upload
8 views1 page

Evaluating User Intent and Page Quality

Uploaded by

heavenlylight
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
8 views1 page

Evaluating User Intent and Page Quality

Uploaded by

heavenlylight
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SxS

. User Intent
. Assign NM & PQ
. Decide (which is better)
. Explain (rationale)

Helpfulness (as a whole)


Order (best on top)

Diversity in result sets


. User Intent (multiple interpretations, ambiguity prefers diversity, entire result
set should be addressed)
. Sources & Sites (variety, should include several different sources)
. Result Types (some queries served well by diff types of results)
. People & Cltures (broad qs, consider diversity of BG, if specific reflect
diversity within the scope)

More - Helpfulness of the set as a whole


Useless - Useless results add nothing, can be distracting/discouraging
Unwanted - malicious / porn, poor UX

Freshness of information, some q demand very recent info.

---
PQ
. Instructions
. Page Purpose (beneficial purpose)
. Main Content (essence, quantity & quality)
. Website Info (Who runs the site & created the content)
. Reputation (research, reviews & expert opinion)
. EAT (expertise, authority, trust)
. Overall PQ (how well does the page achieve its purpose)
. Comment (influences rating, opinion, research, quote guidelines, confirm rating)

YMYL sites, mixed reputation is cause for low rating


unsatisfying info as well/.

If torn betw 2 ratings, use the lower.

You might also like