Free Fall Motion Laboratory Report
Free Fall Motion Laboratory Report
1
School of Basic Sciences and Engineering, National Open and Distance University
Summary
In this laboratory practice, the intention is to find the empirical relationship between the
position and the time of an object in free fall, as well as the mathematical correlation between the
speed (v) and time (t). Through the already known equations for this phenomenon
physical, the respective calculations of the values and their representations were made through
graphs and tables, in order to obtain the data, measurements of height and times were taken
fall at different times with the help of a ball and/or sphere and the tracker program which executes
the analysis of free fall. This allowed us to verify that the analyzed motion is of type
uniformly accelerated.
Uncertainty.
Abstract
The intention in this laboratory practice is to find the empirical relationship between the
position and time of an object in free fall, as well as the mathematical correlation between
velocity (v) and time (t). By means of the equations already known for this physical
phenomenon, the respective calculations of the values and their representations were made by
means of graphs and tables. help of a ball and/or sphere and the tracker program which
LABORATORY REPORT PRACTICAL COMPONENT
performs the free fall analysis. This allowed us to verify that the analyzed movement is of a
1. INTRODUCTION
What is free fall? In the following report, we will reveal every important aspect of falling.
free, its meaning as the first resource is; free fall is called any vertical fall without
no support of any kind, whose trajectory is barely subject to the force of gravity. It is a
The Italian scientist Galileo Galilei was the first to demonstrate in the year 1590 that all
bodies, whether large or small, in the absence of friction, fall to Earth with the same acceleration,
the acceleration in free fall is the acceleration due to gravity, which is approximately 9.81 m/s2.
To understand the free fall movement, throughout this report, we will analyze the relationship that
they have the distance or height from which the object falls, the time it takes to reach the surface or
Theoretical Framework
The movement of bodies in free fall (due to the action of their own weight) is a form of linear motion.
uniformly accelerated.
The distance traveled (d) is measured vertically and corresponds, therefore, to a height that is
In a vacuum, the falling motion has constant acceleration, with that acceleration being the same for
The presence of air slows down that falling movement and the acceleration then depends on the
shape of the body. However, for approximately spherical bodies, the influence of the medium on
The motion can be disregarded and treated, in a first approximation, as if it were in free fall.
represented by the letter g and takes an approximate value of 9.81 m/s2 (some only use the value 9.8 or
If the movement considered is descending or falling, the value of g is positive as it should be.
to a genuine acceleration. If, on the contrary, it is a vertical ascent, the value of g is considered
Free fall exists when a body is released from a height X, with an initial velocity of zero and
during the fall, it accelerates due to the force of gravity. The constant is the value of
Free fall (without friction): The force acting on a falling body is indicated by an F and is measured in
newtons. A newton is composed of the mass of the body (in kg) and the acceleration (in m/s²), where
Additional information: Bodies with different masses fall at the same speed in a vacuum. For this reason,
The reason is that the general equation of free fall is as follows: h = h0 - 1/2 gt² In other words, the calculation
D. The force of gravity is what produces the constant acceleration in free fall.
LABORATORY REPORT PRACTICAL COMPONENT
E. The acceleration produced in free fall is called acceleration due to gravity and is
To carry out this laboratory, a free fall apparatus was used, which consisted of
place a sphere and/or ball and let it fall using a wall of a different color than the sphere and/or ball,
making two marks to indicate the height of 2.00 m. I repeated this procedure 3 times from the
same height to demonstrate how much the time varies, additionally because the ball had a movement and
when running the video it started well, but at one point it lost the trajectory of the ball and did not take the data,
three completely different heights were taken since when recording the video it was not
It highlighted the point that was marked because he released the ball very above the point.
After the recording of the video of this procedure, it is taken to the TRACKER program which helps to find
1. Measurements: The measurements were taken directly with the wall that was to measure more than 2.00
2. OBJECTS USED:
Illustration 5Ball
Illustration 6Metro
In Illustration 7, the Tracker screen is shown when a mark has been made in each.
Successive image of the ball. The red scale bar has been placed between the marks.
3. IMPLEMENTATION
The measurement was taken with a meter on the white wall, standing two meters away and
marking the division of the two points with red tape, the measurement was taken several times so it could be seen
the first mark and how the ball fell, I positioned myself next to the mark left on the wall and requested
they will record me dropping the ball from a height of 2.0 m in order to film the descent, the difficulty
what was presented is that sometimes the ball would bounce off the wall and lose the straight line it was supposed to follow,
After making the video of the ball falling, we entered the Tracker application and started with the
validation process to measure the time and distance the ball had.
The following table records the data provided by the Tracker program taken from the video.
mass_A
t(s) y(m)
0 0.000833
0.033 0.0141
0.067 0.0427
0.1 0.0778
0.133 0.127
0.167 0.189
0.2 0.25
0.233 0.33
0.267 0.426
0.3 0.519
0.333 0.635
0.366 0.75
0.4 0.88
0.433 1,007
0.466 1,154
0.5 1,302
0.533 1,463
0.566 1,631
0.6 1,809
0.633 1,987
Table 2 Values of time and height taken with the tracker program.
LABORATORY REPORT PRACTICAL COMPONENT
In illustration 9, the fit of a Line (green line) to the data (fuchsia line) is very good, so
What we can say is that the motion is of constant acceleration. The coefficient of the term that has
The value of the object's fall time is: 0.633 s, considering that the fall time goes from
1
= 2 ( 15 )
2
We solve for g and substitute values resulting in the acceleration of gravity being 7.067.
m/s2
To determine the uncertainty of gravity, you must use the following equation:
= + 2 (16)
Graph the data from Table 5 in Excel using the template provided below:LINK
EXCEL TEMPLATE. The template performs the quadratic adjustment and also determines the
gravity and the associated uncertainty (error). See the video on how to use the template
(VIDEO LINK).
LABORATORY REPORT PRACTICAL COMPONENT
With the fitting function, relate the slope to the acceleration due to gravity and
masa_A
t y Delta of (t) Delta (y) Y (adjustment) Uncertainty
0 0.000833 -0.033 -1,32E-02 -0,14286995 0.142869952
0.033 0.0141 -0.034 -2,87E-02 -0,14272021 0.175720208
0.067 0.0427 -0.033 -3,50E-02 -0,14286995 0.209869952
0.1 0.0778 -0.033 -4.93E-02 -0.14286995 0.242869952
0.133 0.127 -0.034 -6,20E-02 -0,14272021 0.275720208
0.167 0.189 -0.033 -6,10E-02 -0,14286995 0.309869952
0.2 0.25 -0.033 -0.08 -0.14286995 0.342869952
0.233 0.33 -0.034 -9,60E-02 -0,14272021 0.375720208
0.267 0.426 -0.033 -0.093 0.409869952
0.3 0.519 -0.033 -0.116 0.442869952
0.333 0.635 -0.033 -1.15E-01 -0.14286995 0.475869952
0.366 0.75 -0.034 -1.30E-01 -0.14272021 0.508720208
0.4 0.88 -0.033 -0.127 -0.14286995 0.542869952
0.433 1,007 -0.033 -1,47E-01 -0,14286995 0.575869952
0.466 1,154 -0.034 -1.48E-01 -0.14272021 0.608720208
0.5 1,302 -0.033 -0.161 -0.14286995 0,642869952
0.533 1,463 -0.033 -1,68E-01 -0,14286995 0.675869952
0.566 1,631 0.566 1,63E+00 -0,29294581 0.858945808
Table 3 of uncertainty
Carry out the final discussion and analysis based on the results recorded in the table.
g (m/s2) Δ g (/s 2
) 2
g (m/translatedText
) Δ g (m/s2)
In the discussion and analysis, discuss which method produced a more accurate result, with
The method that obtained the least uncertainty was the second method.
4. CONCLUSIONS
In this practice, a simple free fall experiment in the air of a ball has been conducted to measure
With the repetitions of the experiment, an error margin was found, which indicates that no matter how much
small as the difference of any of the non-constant components, these tend to vary the
acceleration or time.
It was proven that the acceleration of gravity does not depend on mass, but quite the opposite.
After conducting the free fall experience with the video camera, it can be stated that this
the method is not accurate under the given conditions, so the value calculated with other methods (approx.
9.81 does not resemble the obtained from the experience, that is, the interval (7.067 - 973.18)m/s2.
LABORATORY REPORT PRACTICAL COMPONENT
Errors occur due to failures when measuring. When working with very small values, it is possible to
discriminate figures that will drastically affect the expected results. With determination
from the equations for position as a function of time or velocity as a function of time, it is possible
Errors occur due to failures when measuring. When working with very small values, one can
With the determination of the equations for position as a function of time or velocity as a function of
Errors occur due to failures when measuring. When working with very small values, it can be
discriminate figures that will drastically affect the expected results. With determination
From the equations for position as a function of time or velocity as a function of time, it is possible
5. REFERENCES
2 Cabrera María, Kessler Sofía, Solanilla Juan, "Determination of the value of acceleration of the
3 López Marina, Muriel Nadia, Noseda Victoria, Pardini, Pamela, "Acceleration of gravity,
4 Prof. of Physics and Chemistry Francisco Rojas Melgarejo, “New technologies in determination
experimental determination of the value of the acceleration of gravity on Earth", Eureka Journal, Spain, 2008.
REFERENCES
HILL.
[4] [Link]