Audiological Report for Antonella Piñeiro
Translated by
ScribdTranslationsAudiological Report for Antonella Piñeiro
Translated by
ScribdTranslationsAUDIOLOGICAL REPORT
1.- GENERAL BACKGROUND
Antonella Roman Piñeiro
04/16/2011
7 years, 6 months
24.854.360-4
Origin: Patricio Mekis School
Reason for Consultation: PIE Evaluation 2019.
Assessment Instruments:
Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA, 2004).
Speech and language assessment guidelines for school-aged children between 7 and 12 years old. (PEFE)
Simplified Pragmatic Protocol (Prutting and Kirchner, 1987).
Test to evaluate the comprehension and expression of narrative discourse.
Articulation Test for Repetition (TAR)
Anatomofunctional guideline.
2.- BACKGROUND OF THE SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY CARE
11/11/2018
2.2.- Evaluation instruments applied:
Use the table only in cases where it applies, that is, if the student is in
the age ranges of the tests. See Article No. 38 of Supreme Decree 170/09.
ITPA Score Age Typical Score Discrepancy
Total Psycholinguistics of Normality
Listening Comprehension 26 5-8 years 37 -11
Auditory Association 13 4 - 8 years 25 -12
Sequential Memory 5 4 - 5 years 10 -5
Auditory
Verbal Expression 35 6 - 3 years 42 -7
Grammatical Integration 9 4 - 1 years 22 -13
Auditory Integration 8 4 - 2 years 18 -10
Pefe Level Level PEF Score Category of
semantic morphosyntactic performance
22 15 37 sufficient
2.3.- Synthesis of Speech Therapy Record:
2.3.1.- Phonoarticulatory Organs: Regarding the extraoral anatomy of the minor,
a symmetrical development of the facial structure is observed in both cheeks, lips, and
nose. In the intraoral inspection, the following is observed: tongue with normal characteristics, frenulum
adequate sublingual, hard palate and velum normal characteristics, the uvula is observed
normal.
3.2. Speech parameters: Prosody, articulation, rhythm, and normal fluency.
Expressive: In the ITPA test, a psycholinguistic age is observed in auditory integration.
of 4 years 1 month showing a significant delay in this skill. The student does not
It has processes of phonological simplification and manages to produce complex polysyllables.
Reception: The sequential auditory memory is also found to be diminished.
a psycholinguistic age of 4 years 5 months, which differs greatly from their age
7-year-old. On the other hand, in the auditory comprehension item of the ITPA test, he/she obtains a
performance of 26 obtaining a linguistic age in this item of 5 years 8 months.
Phonetically, it is observed that there are difficulties in the emission of syllables in position
trabant, such as: /b/, /x/ and /t/. Regarding the production of consonant diphones,
Antonella manages to emit all of these without difficulty.
Semantic
Expressive: In the verbal expression test, the student achieves a score of 35.
points relating to a linguistic age of 6 years and 3 months. During the test,
she observed that the categories that presented the greatest challenge for the student were
mainly those of fruits and animals, in the rest of them a yield was obtained
symmetric.
Receptive: In the auditory association of the ITPA test element, it has an age
Psycholinguistics of 4 years and 8 months with a total of 13 points obtained.
In the PEFE test, in its semantic section, he obtained a total of 22 points presenting
difficulty in all evaluated items, the section with the best performance was the one of
definitions, where I manage to define by function and by category.
Morpho - Syntactic
Expressive: In spontaneous speech, the student manages to structure coordinated sentences and
Subordinate clauses, however, have a limited meter and sometimes show absence.
of syntactic elements such as adverbs, prepositions, among others. Their
sentences agree in gender and number.
In the sentence construction item of the PEFE test, the student scored 3 points.
10, managing to create simple sentences when an element was delivered but upon request
Sentences with two elements he was not able to carry out.
The receptive: In the grammatical integration of the ITPA test, the minor obtained a score of 9.
points relating to a psycholinguistic age of 4 years 1 month. In conversation
non-structural. Elena is able to understand and answer open-ended questions with headings,
¿qué? ¿Quién? ¿dónde? ¿Cuál? Y ¿Quiénes?.
Pragmatic:
Eye contact is functional and the communicative intention is diminished,
that the minor does not initiate topics, she only maintains them. Conversation topics are always
proximity is within normal limits, its physical proximity, body posture and
body movements are appropriate.
As for the narrative speech, Antonella presented significant difficulties in the
comprehension of the text 'the gluttonous little squirrel' answering only 4 out of 9 questions that are given to you
They made it from the listened text. In the retelling, he was able to identify characters and the problem.
but not the place where the story takes place, omitting important details of the act and
I present an abrupt and incomplete ending. In the PEFE test, within the subtest of
the minor scored 3 out of 10 by recognizing only characters and in one of the
images showed actions taken by this. The same happened in the descriptions,
where I only mention characters from these.
observations
Elena is a very receptive girl and shows a good attitude towards evaluation.
Regarding the items, an increased response time is observed and at times it
He/She must have repeated the questions more than once.
3.-EVALUATION RESULTS:
3.1.- Synthesis of the Evaluation:
His linguistic-communicative performance is below the expected level for his age.
expressive level, still has difficulty in structuring sentences. Regarding the skills
In psycholinguistics, a decline is evident in all the assessed skills. The
As mentioned earlier, it interferes with interaction and communication with the environment.
3.2.- Speech Therapy Diagnosis: Mixed Language Disorder secondary to
borderline intellectual functioning.
3.3.- Instructions: You must continue in the School Integration Project in the year 2019,
start with speech therapy to work on linguistic and phonetic aspects
descended psycholinguistics.
3.4.- Referral: Special Education Teacher to address the specific difficulties that the
younger.
11/11/2018
11/11/2019