Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM)
Communication with personnel
Determine Recruitment criteria
Regular Administrative Work
Resource Responsibility
Training mgmt based on TNA
Handling of leave application
Allocation of Responsibility
Handling of Labour union
P - Primary Responsibility
Personnel Management
Performance Analysis
A - Approval Authority
HR Legal compliance
Evaluation of Training
Selection Efficiency
S - Supporting Responsibility
Skill Matrix analysis
I - Information Only
Responsibility
% of Scoring
NAME
Total Score
REMARKS
SUSMITA SAHA A 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 34 71
BARNALI GHOSH S 0 2 3 3 3 3 0 0 2 3 2 0 21 66
RAYEE CHATTERJEE P 0 2 4 2 2 3 0 0 2 3 3 3 2 26 65
COMPETANCY LEVEL RANK Prepared by:HR Head Approved by: Director
Not Applicable (NA) 0
Poor Performance 1
Average Performance 2
Satisfactory Performance/ Intermediate 3
Efficient Performance/ Advance 4
CRITERIA Rank N.B.: Rank against each Criteria has been determined based on working experience knowledge
Approval Authority 75%
Primary Responsibility 70%
Supporting Responsibility 65%
Information Only 60% Ver No.01 Date of Issue: 06.03.2023
Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM)
Idea on Change of Applicability
Understanding of Specification
Resource Responsibility
Communication With Vendors
Awareness of New innovation
Update the rank of Vendors
Communication intra Dept.
P - Primary Responsibility
Maintaining Vendors List
A - Approval Authority
S - Supporting Responsibility
Selection of Vendors
Monitoring Vendors
Vendors Evaluation
Tendering Methods
I - Information Only
Responsibility
NAME
% of Scoring
Total Score
REMARKS
DEBASISH DAS A 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 26 81
HASAN DEWAN P 4 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 23 96
KRISHNA SINGH S 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 18 64
MALAY SIGHA ROY S 0 3 2 3 3 2 2 15 63
RIA SEN S 0 3 3 3 3 3 15 75
COMPETANCY LEVEL RANK Prepared by: Opr Head Approved by: Director
Not Applicable (NA) 0
Poor Performance 1
Average Performance 2
Satisfactory Performance/ Intermed 3
Efficient Performance/ Advance 4
CRITERIA Rank N.B.: Rank against each Criteria has been determined based on working experience knowledge
Approval Authority 75%
Primary Responsibility 70%
Supporting Responsibility 65%
NAME
Information Only
I - Information Only
A - Approval Authority
Resource Responsibility
P - Primary Responsibility
S - Supporting Responsibility
Responsibility
60% Understanding of Specification
Tendering Methods
Selection of Vendors
Maintaining Vendors List
Monitoring Vendors
Vendors Evaluation
Communication With Vendors
Ver No.01
Update the rank of Vendors
Awareness of New innovation
Idea on Change of Applicability
Communication intra Dept.
Total Score
Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM)
% of Scoring
REMARKS
Date of Issue: 04.08.20
Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM)
Optimum Resources Utilisation
QMS objective Targets are met
Resource Responsibility
On-Time Delivery of the Order
Organising Training Session
Supervising Work Progress
Proper Medicines Indenting
Re-Scheduling Plan & Time
P - Primary Responsibility
Effective Communication
Ensuring Health & Safety
Process Monitoring / QC
Team Work & Efficiency
License /Norms are met
A - Approval Authority
Determine Time Scale
Preparation of Target
Maintain Productivity
S - Supporting Responsibility
I - Information Only
Responsibility
% of Scoring
NAME
Total Score
REMARKS
DEBASISH DAS A 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 52 100
FALGUNI GHOSAL P 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 31 60
BARUN ADHIKARY P 3 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 2 39 75
SANTANU GHOSH P 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 4 2 2 34 65
PRASANTA SARKAR P 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 4 2 2 34 65
COMPETANCY LEVEL RANK Prepared by: Operation Manager Approved by: Director
Not Applicable (NA) 0
Poor Performance 1
Average Performance 2
Satisfactory Performance/ Intermed 3
Efficient Performance/ Advance 4
CRITERIA Rank N.B.: Rank against each Criteria has been determined based on working experience knowledge
Approval Authority 75%
Primary Responsibility 70% 0
Supporting Responsibility 65%
Information Only 60% Date of Issue: 04.08.20