Recycling Techniques for End-of-Life PV Modules
Recycling Techniques for End-of-Life PV Modules
Abstract—As the adoption of photovoltaic (PV) technology (RETs). Among these technologies, solar photovoltaic (SPV)
grows, the need for sustainable waste management becomes stands out as a prominent contender due to its ability to
imperative. In this study we investigated different physical route harness abundant sunlight globally. Notably, advancements in
recovery methods such as crushing recycling, high voltage pulse,
laser irradiance, and hot knife processes, targeting the retrieval technology have led to a remarkable reduction in the price
of valuable materials like silicon, metals, glass, and encapsulants. per watt, dropping it by less than 0.5 US Dollars (USD)
By reviewing existing literature, we assess the technical viability [1][2]. This favorable progress has resulted in a substantial
of these techniques and highlight their limitations. The crushing increase in the deployment of SPV over the past decade
technique demonstrates effectiveness in glass recycling but falls (2011 to 2021). The global installed capacity has witnessed a
short in recovering other valuable components, highlighting
its limitations as a standalone solution. High Voltage Pulse remarkable surge, reaching an impressive cumulative capacity
crushing exhibits promise with an impressive 85% recycling of 843 GW by the end of 2021, and is projected to reach 1630
rate, emphasizing increased material purity. Laser irradiation, GW in 2030 and 4500 GW by 2050, as illustrated in Figure
specialized for EVA recycling, is noted for its user-friendly 1.
nature, making it an attractive candidate for hybrid approaches.
The simplicity of the hot knife technique is evident in its
effectiveness for glass and EVA recycling, though expert handling
requirements and potential damage pose limitations. Integration
of these techniques, considering their strengths and weaknesses,
provides a roadmap for developing a holistic and efficient end-
of-life recycling strategy for solar PV panels. Our findings
underline the evolving landscape of PV waste management,
and emphasize proposing an integrated solution to address the
growing challenges in a sustainable and efficient manner, and
provides insights for policymakers and stakeholders seeking
environmentally conscious solutions.
Index Terms—Solar Photovoltaic, Waste, Recycling, Waste
Management, Physical Route
Fig. 1. Solar PV accumulative Instillation Project till 2030 and 2050 [3][4]
I. I NTRODUCTION
The landscape of the energy industry has been experienc- Among the various renewable energy technologies available,
ing a significant transformation, shifting steadily towards the solar photovoltaics stands out as an exceptional and eco-
exploration and adoption of renewable energy technologies friendly means of electricity generation. However, like any
technology, it also undergoes the aging process, and upon
Authorized licensed use limited to: DELHI TECHNICAL UNIV. Downloaded on August 26,2025 at 07:52:57 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
reaching the end of its lifespan, decommissioning becomes prioritizing environmental friendliness and sustainability. By
necessary. This decommissioning process involves disman- adhering to this pathway, recyclers can successfully reclaim
tling, recycling, and proper disposal [3]. It is crucial for valuable resources, minimize waste generation, and actively
the solar photovoltaic industry to maintain its reputation as participate in the circular economy by reintegrating the ex-
a green, clean, and environmentally friendly energy source. tracted materials back into the production cycle. The flowchart
Therefore, it must ensure that the decommissioning phase of physical separation is given in Figure 3.
does not result in leaving behind a trail of hazardous waste
that could compromise its eco-friendly standing. The rapid
expansion of installed capacity in solar photovoltaic (PV)
panels will inevitably lead to a rise in the generation of end-of-
life (EOL) waste [3]. Projections suggest that the cumulative
EOL waste generated from solar PV panels could range from 8
to 78 million metric tons between 2030 and 2050, as depicted
in Figure 2 [4][5].
Authorized licensed use limited to: DELHI TECHNICAL UNIV. Downloaded on August 26,2025 at 07:52:57 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
A. Crushing Recycling • Down recycling: it is a process in which we use crushing
The crushing happens when we break apart the layers of we crush the solar panel into tiny pieces and do not do
a solar panel into smaller pieces. We do this by crushing, any other treatments In conclusion we only use machinal
shredding, grinding, and milling as shown in figure-4. parts in this process and there are two types:
(a) closed circuit crushing: in this process, we do the
crushing many times to make varied sizes or until we
reach the desired size.
(b) open circuit crushing: in this process, we do the
crushing only 1 time which saves time and energy.
Finally, the result of downcycling is a mixture of materials
that are typically used for low-value purposes
• High-Value Recycling: is the process we separate the
layers of solar panels by their material and it should be
done with machinal thermal and chemical so we will not
go into detail in this part, the goal is to get very pure
material with high yield and reduce pollution this process
is redesigning, for example, some group are interested in
the sliver so they redesign the process to get the maximum
of the material they want
• High-Value Recycling can be divided into three steps:
(i). Separating the Different Parts: In this step, we break
Fig. 4. crushing technique in real life [9]
items into pieces and use techniques like dense medium
separation (using different weights) and magnets to sep-
• Crushing is when we use strong forces to break apart arate the varied materials present in the items.
the solar panel. We can do this either with everything (ii). Sorting the Material: After separating, we put things
connected or with some parts taken out. that are alike together. We can do this by using our hands
or special machines that can sense things and figure out
(i) Shredding is when we keep cutting the panel to make where they belong based on what they are made of.
it even smaller. (iii). Recovering the Valuable Components: In the last
(ii) Grinding and milling are other ways to make the step, we take out important things from the sorted ma-
pieces even tinier and separate various parts of the panel. terials. We can do this by melting them or using special
Furthermore, the crushing recycling method is categorized processes to get valuable metals like gold and silver. We
into two main categories “Down Cycling” and High Value can also use special chemicals to separate and get back
Recycling” as shown in Figure 5. useful parts from the rest of the materials [10].
Authorized licensed use limited to: DELHI TECHNICAL UNIV. Downloaded on August 26,2025 at 07:52:57 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
substantial chunks of material. The primary objective of
this crushing step is twofold to yield a size that can be
easily managed for further processing and to meet the
desired specifications of the product as shown in Figure
6.
Fig. 7. Products obtained from the secondary crushing step of the glass layer
(glass particles were removed) [11].
Authorized licensed use limited to: DELHI TECHNICAL UNIV. Downloaded on August 26,2025 at 07:52:57 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Fig. 9. Working process for the back EVA recycling via the laser irradiation
[12].
Authorized licensed use limited to: DELHI TECHNICAL UNIV. Downloaded on August 26,2025 at 07:52:57 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
promoting the principles of environmental sustainability and This improvement in purity is a significant step towards
circular economy within the photovoltaic industry. maximizing material restoration. To further elevate its
efficiency, integrating complementary strategies is sug-
gested. By combining High Voltage Pulse crushing with
techniques specialized in recovering other valuable com-
ponents (such as metals), a more comprehensive approach
could potentially be achieved.
• Laser Irradiation: Laser irradiation presents a specialized
technique primarily suited for EVA recycling, as high-
lighted in Table 2. Despite its relatively higher cost,
the distinct advantage lies in its user-friendly nature,
Fig. 11. The process of separation EVA and glass using hot knife [13] eliminating the need for expert intervention. This feature
makes laser irradiation an attractive candidate for inte-
The flowchart of High-voltage pulse crushing is given in gration into a hybrid approach. While it might not be
Figure 12 suitable for overall panel breakdown, incorporating laser
irradiation as a targeted step could enhance the recovery
of specific components like EVA, thus contributing to the
development of a new hybrid technique.
• Hot Knife: the hot knife technique’s simplicity is evident
Fig. 12. Hot knife Method in its effectiveness for glass and EVA recycling. However,
the requirement for expert handling and the potential
Below are the steps of the hot knife method for recycling for catastrophic damage, as indicated in Table 1, pose
silicon-wasted solar panels: significant limitations. While the hot knife technique
• Heating the Cutter: The glass/EVA division machine, might not be the core approach due to these limitations,
ordinarily made by NPC Joined in Japan, warms the it could still be valuable if integrated strategically. For
cutter to a temperature extend of 180–200 ◦C. instance, it could be combined with other techniques
• Softening the EVA: The warmed cutter is utilized to in a controlled manner to facilitate precise separation
soften the EVA layer that follows to the glass and silicon of glass and EVA without jeopardizing other valuable
cells. components.
• Cutting EVA: With the EVA softened, the cutter, which Furthermore, in table 2 all four technologies’ capacity to
may utilize controlled pulsating knife frequencies, cuts extract the raw material from the solar PV end-of-life waste
through the EVA layer. is given.
• Separation of Components: As the EVA layer is cut, it
isolates from the glass and silicon cells, allowing their
recovery [14].
III. C ONCLUSION AND D ISCUSSION :
In this study, we investigated four different solar PV end-of-
life waste recycling techniques for technology assessment to
come up with their advantages and disadvantages in terms of
material recycling. In table-1 a detailed comparative analysis
of the four investigated techniques is given.
• Crushing: The crushing technique demonstrates effec-
tiveness in glass recycling, contributing to a partial
restoration of materials from solar panels. However, its
limitations in recovering other valuable components, such
as metals, significantly hinder its potential to achieve the
overarching goal of comprehensive material restoration.
Crushing might serve as an initial step in breaking down
solar panels, but its standalone application falls short of
a holistic solution.
• High Voltage Pulse Crushing: High Voltage Pulse crush-
ing showcases great promise, yielding an impressive 85%
recycling rate according to Table 2. This technique not
only enhances the overall recycling rate but also leads
to increased material purity, as indicated in Table 1.
Authorized licensed use limited to: DELHI TECHNICAL UNIV. Downloaded on August 26,2025 at 07:52:57 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
TABLE I
A DVANTAGE AND D ISADVANTAGE OF E ACH P HYSICAL S EPARATION T ECHNIQUE
TABLE II
R ECOVER MATERIAL FROM E ACH T ECHNIQUE [15]
Authorized licensed use limited to: DELHI TECHNICAL UNIV. Downloaded on August 26,2025 at 07:52:57 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.