Making sense of
scientific literature
(continued)
Lecture 3
What we've discussed so far...
The scientific method: Scientific Communication:
[Link] [Link]/ libap ps/accoun ts/101452/images/anatomy_of_scien ce_article.jpg
Today's learning outcomes
Describe an approach that can help you summarize a scientific paper
effectively, and link this to what we just learned about where different
pieces of information are found in a scientific paper
Distinguish pseudoscience from science
Summarizing scientific literature
Ask yourself
the following • [Link] is the problem
5 questions as being addressed, and why?
you read (and •Where would you find this
reread as information?
necessary):
Summarizing scientific literature
Ask yourself
•2. What do the authors plan
the following to do?
5 questions as (objectives/hypothesis)
you read (and
•Where would you find this
reread as
information?
necessary):
Summarizing scientific literature
Ask yourself
the following •3. How did the authors
5 questions as tackle this investigation?
you read (and •Where would you find
reread as this information?
necessary):
Summarizing scientific literature
Ask yourself
the following •4. What did the
5 questions as authors find out?
you read (and •Where would you
reread as find this information?
necessary):
Summarizing scientific literature
Ask yourself
the following •5. What do the findings
5 questions as mean (conclusions)?
you read (and •Where would you find
reread as this information?
necessary):
• What is the problem being addressed,
Five Guiding and why?
Questions: The • What do the authors plan to
do? (objectives/hypothesis)
Backbone of
Interpreting a • How did the authors tackle this
investigation?
Scientific Paper • What did the authors find out?
• What do the findings mean? (conclusions)
Using this framework, may in most cases, be helpful for
distinguishing pseudoscience from science.
Science vs
pseudoscience
Meg to show 2 videos:
• [Link]
X8Xfl0JdTQ?feature=shared
• [Link]
red
One approach to understanding
complex scientific literature is to break it
down into 5 key questions- each
emphasizing an important part of the
paper.
In summary Pseudoscience can be tricky to
differentiate from science, it involves the
presentation of information (some of
which may even be true) that sounds
scientific but is not the product of the
scientific method