0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views11 pages

Summarizing Scientific Literature Effectively

The document outlines an approach to effectively summarize scientific papers by addressing five key questions related to the problem, objectives, methods, findings, and conclusions. It emphasizes the importance of distinguishing pseudoscience from legitimate science, highlighting that pseudoscience may present misleading information that appears scientific but lacks the rigor of the scientific method. The lecture also includes resources for further understanding the differences between science and pseudoscience.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views11 pages

Summarizing Scientific Literature Effectively

The document outlines an approach to effectively summarize scientific papers by addressing five key questions related to the problem, objectives, methods, findings, and conclusions. It emphasizes the importance of distinguishing pseudoscience from legitimate science, highlighting that pseudoscience may present misleading information that appears scientific but lacks the rigor of the scientific method. The lecture also includes resources for further understanding the differences between science and pseudoscience.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Making sense of

scientific literature
(continued)
Lecture 3
What we've discussed so far...
The scientific method: Scientific Communication:

[Link] [Link]/ libap ps/accoun ts/101452/images/anatomy_of_scien ce_article.jpg


Today's learning outcomes

Describe an approach that can help you summarize a scientific paper


effectively, and link this to what we just learned about where different
pieces of information are found in a scientific paper

Distinguish pseudoscience from science


Summarizing scientific literature

Ask yourself
the following • [Link] is the problem
5 questions as being addressed, and why?
you read (and •Where would you find this
reread as information?
necessary):
Summarizing scientific literature

Ask yourself
•2. What do the authors plan
the following to do?
5 questions as (objectives/hypothesis)
you read (and
•Where would you find this
reread as
information?
necessary):
Summarizing scientific literature

Ask yourself
the following •3. How did the authors
5 questions as tackle this investigation?
you read (and •Where would you find
reread as this information?
necessary):
Summarizing scientific literature

Ask yourself
the following •4. What did the
5 questions as authors find out?
you read (and •Where would you
reread as find this information?
necessary):
Summarizing scientific literature

Ask yourself
the following •5. What do the findings
5 questions as mean (conclusions)?
you read (and •Where would you find
reread as this information?
necessary):
• What is the problem being addressed,
Five Guiding and why?

Questions: The • What do the authors plan to


do? (objectives/hypothesis)
Backbone of
Interpreting a • How did the authors tackle this
investigation?
Scientific Paper • What did the authors find out?

• What do the findings mean? (conclusions)

Using this framework, may in most cases, be helpful for


distinguishing pseudoscience from science.
Science vs
pseudoscience
Meg to show 2 videos:

• [Link]
X8Xfl0JdTQ?feature=shared

• [Link]
red
One approach to understanding
complex scientific literature is to break it
down into 5 key questions- each
emphasizing an important part of the
paper.

In summary Pseudoscience can be tricky to


differentiate from science, it involves the
presentation of information (some of
which may even be true) that sounds
scientific but is not the product of the
scientific method

You might also like