0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views57 pages

Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System

The document outlines a course on Human Subject Research focusing on rehabilitation treatment protocols, led by Dr. Amit Sethi from the University of Utah. It emphasizes the importance of understanding treatment mechanisms, active ingredients, and the role of moderators in treatment efficacy. The course includes immersive discussions and activities aimed at developing effective rehabilitation strategies.

Uploaded by

pkh390617
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views57 pages

Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System

The document outlines a course on Human Subject Research focusing on rehabilitation treatment protocols, led by Dr. Amit Sethi from the University of Utah. It emphasizes the importance of understanding treatment mechanisms, active ingredients, and the role of moderators in treatment efficacy. The course includes immersive discussions and activities aimed at developing effective rehabilitation strategies.

Uploaded by

pkh390617
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Human Subject Research:

Principles, Design, & Approach

IKS 592_9
2 credits
June 9 - 18
A little bit about
me
A m i t S e t hi , P h D , O T R /L
D ir e c to r N E u ra l P la s ti c ity, R e h a bi lit a ti on
& M ov e m e n t D y na m i c s (N E R D ) L a b
D e p a rt m e nt s o f O c cu p a ti o na l & R e c re a t io n al
T h e ra p ie s , B i o m e di c al E n g in e er in g , Ph y s ic a l Th e r ap y
& A th l et ic Tr a in in g
U n i v e rs i ty o f U ta h , S al t La k e C i ty, U S A
Amit’s Background

3
Who is Amit?

4
Why do I need this course?
Course introduction
General expectations
• Be on time
• Attendance in first 5 minutes
• Email me in advance and copy Dr. Arnav Bhavsar if you are
going to miss the class
• Silence your phone
• No eating in class, eat in the break
• Immersive group discussions
• Ask questions during the questions slide
• Course notes – google drive
Module 1: Rehabilitation
Treatment Specification System
Objective
• Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System for developing
treatment protocols
Activity
Groups 1-2:
Think of a situation from your experience where you tried every treatment to the
best of your knowledge in your field and still there. Describe the treatment and
identify a couple of reasons of why do you think the client did not show
improvement?

Groups 3-4:
Think of a situation where you provided similar treatments to two clients, one client
improved but the other showed minimal improvement? Describe the treatment and
identify a couple of reasons for the discrepancy in the effect of treatment?
Problems with IKS treatments
• Lack of standardized ways to:
- define and describe treatments
- less specificity
- effectively communicate the elements of our treatments
with clients and other members of our team
Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System
(RTSS)
How do we develop treatments?

Identify
Assess Treat
problem
Think and write down the steps you take to develop
a treatment plan after identifying the problem

Identify
Assess Treat
problem
How do we develop treatments?

?
Assess Identify ? Treat
problem
QUESTIONS
What are the steps to develop a treatment protocol?
CAUSALITY

Active Mechanism Target


Ingredients (s) of Action

• What the • How the • Aspect of


clinician treatment functioning
does (or is expected directly
selects) to work targeted
for change

TREATMENT SPECIFICATION
Example of development of treatment
in medicine
Goal: Decrease Headache by taking Crocin

Paracetamol Prostaglandins Headache

Active Ingredient Mechanism of Action Target


QUESTIONS
Example of development of treatment
in medicine
Goal: Decrease Headache by taking Crocin

Paracetamol Prostaglandins Headache

Active Ingredient Mechanism of Action Target


Understanding the mechanism
is important to….
- Develop, test and - Explain how the - Identify who
identify the active intervention works responds to the
ingredients of an - Refine intervention intervention
intervention parameters

WHAT HOW WHO

Aickin (2007); Dijkers et al.


(2014)
QUESTIONS
What: Develop, test and validate the
theoretical basis of an intervention
Mechanistic studies help to identify the
active ingredient(s) of an intervention

Intervention
Active ingredients

Problem Goal
Dijkers et al. (2014)
Intervention:
Strength-training

Problem: Goal: Heavy-


muscle weakness weight lifting
Active
ingredient:
Weight-lifting

Problem: Goal: Heavy-


muscle weakness weight lifting
QUESTIONS
Behavioral interventions are complex

• Often there are:


- more than 1 active ingredients
- more than 1 mechanism of action
- more than 1 target
My research: Improve hand function
after stroke
Intervention: combined
brain and hand stimulation

Overall Problem:
hand function Goal: use of weak
hand in daily tasks
The overall decreased hand function problem
is further divided into three sub-problems
Intervention: combined
brain and hand stimulation

Overall Problem:
hand function

brain sensori- hand learned Goal: use of weak


motor activity weakness non-use hand in daily tasks
Intervention: combined brain and
hand stimulation
Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation
(NIBS)

Repeated task practice with


Functional Electrical Stimulation
(FES)
Video of intervention
There are three main active ingredients in the
combined brain and hand stimulation intervention

Intervention: combined
brain and hand stimulation
Active
ingredients

NIBS FES Repeated task practice

Problems

brain sensori- hand learned Goal: use of weak


motor activity weakness non-use hand in daily tasks
QUESTIONS
Understanding the problem helps to develop
‘what’ type of active ingredients constitute
the intervention
How: Explain how an intervention works
: Refine intervention parameters
Active ingredient produces the desired goal
via a mediator
Intervention Mediator: variable
which causes the
Active ingredient
change in the goal

Mediator
(or change agent)

Problem Goal
Baron et al., (1986); Dijkers et al., (2014)
We need to measure the mediator and the goal
to understand ‘how’ active ingredients work

Intervention Measure
Active ingredient
Mediator
(or change agent)

Problem Goal

Measure
Muscle strength
Intervention:
Strength-training

Mediator:
Muscle strength

Problem: Goal: Heavy-


muscle weakness weight lifting
Weight-lifting
performance
QUESTIONS
NIBS mediates hand function by increasing the
activity of sensori-motor brain waves
Intervention: combined
brain and hand stimulation

Active NIBS
ingredients
Mediator:
Activity of sensori-
Overall Problem motor brain waves
hand function

brain sensori- Goal: hand use


motor activity
NIBS mediates hand function by increasing the
activity of sensori-motor brain waves
Intervention: combined
brain and hand stimulation
mu ERD (EEG)
Active NIBS
ingredients
Mediator:
Activity of sensori-
Overall Problem motor brain waves
hand function

brain sensori- Goal: hand use


motor activity
Action Research
Arm Test
There is an association between the change in
the activity of sensorimotor brain waves and
movement after intervention
Activity of brain waves

Action research arm


(mu ERD %)

test score
Pre Mid Post Pre Post
Increased activity of sensorimotor brain waves
after treatment explains ‘how’ NIBS works
QUESTIONS
Mechanistic studies can help to refine
intervention parameters

- Target site
- Timing
- Dosage
- Intensity
- Frequency
A change in the mediation measure without a
meaningful change in the behavioral measure may
suggest increasing the dose of the intervention

(Mechanistic measure)
(Behavioral measure)

Mediator
Goal

Δ ≠ meaningful

Pre Post Pre Post


QUESTIONS
Who: Identify who responds to the
intervention
Moderators influence the effect
of intervention
Intervention Moderator: qualitative
Active ingredient or quantitative variable
that affects the goal

Goal

Problem Moderator

Baron et al., (1986); Dijkers et al., (2014) Goal


Individuals may respond differently to
similar treatments
Participant 1: severe Participant 2: moderate
stroke (FM = 20), age = 69 stroke (FM = 38), age = 43

Δ = meaningful
Action research arm

Action research arm


Δ ≠ meaningful
test score

test score
Pre Post Pre Post
The underlying mediator (mu ERD) shows
differences in response to treatment
Participant 1: severe stroke Participant 2: severe stroke
(FM = 20), age = 69 (FM = 22), age = 43
Activity of brain waves

Activity of brain waves


(mu ERD %)
(mu ERD %)

Pre Mid Post Pre Mid Post


Stroke severity and age (moderators) influence
the effect of intervention
Intervention: combined brain
and hand stimulation
Active NIBS
ingredient

Goal: hand use


Problems: Moderators:
hand function Severity & Age
Goal:≠ hand use
Stroke severity and age (moderators) may
explain ‘who’ responds to the intervention
QUESTIONS

You might also like