Understanding Black Body Radiation
Understanding Black Body Radiation
A black body is one which absorbs all the heat radiations incident on it. The
electromagnetic radiations emitted by a black body is called black body
radiations. Actually, when the radiations fall on the matter, it may be partly
reflected, partly absorb and partly transmitted. Thus we can write following
relations;
Some of the characteristics of black body radiations, have been very useful in
understanding various aspects of heat and thermodynamics and have been
widely used in solving related problems. These can be summarised in the form
of following laws: 1- Kirchhoff’s Law 2-Stefan’s Law 3-Wiens’s law.
Later, Rayleigh-Jeans law and Planks law of radiations provide the basics of
quantum mechanics.
Kirchhoff’s Law
e λ dλ=a λ dQ (1)
e λ dQ
= (2)
a λ dλ
In case of perfect black body with emissivity Eλ (dλ = 1), we get the relation as
Eλ dλ = 1. dQ
dQ
Or Eλ = dλ (3)
Equating equations (1) and (3), we get
eλ
E λ= (4)
aλ
Thus, emissivity of perfectly black body is the ratio of the emissive power of
the body to its absorptive power.
Hence it has seen that, the Kirchhoff’s law embodies two distinct relations-
qualitative and quantitative. Qualitatively, if a body is capable of emitting
certain radiations, it will absorb when they will fall on it. Quantitatively, it
signifies that the ratio is the same for all the bodies.
The most important conclusion given by Kirchhoff’s law is about the solar
spectrum. He explained that the Sunlight has a continuous spectrum. Thus, for
the first time it was asserted that every different type of atom, when it is
properly excited, emits a wavelength that is characteristic of that atom.
E ∝T
4
or E = σ T4
If the body is not perfectly black and has emissivity e, the above law becomes
E = σe T 4
The value of e varies from 0 to 1. This law is not only true for emission but also
true for absorption of radiant energy.
Therefore, net rate of loss or gain of heat energy per unit area of the surface is
given by
Enet =σ ( T 14−T 42 )
Enet =e σ ( T 41 −T 24 )
Wien’s law
1
λm ∝ T or λm T = Constant
−5
E λ =C1 λ exp ( )
−C2
λT
C1 and C2 are constants. This equation gives the Wein’s law of distribution of
energy.
Rayleigh-Jean’s Law
8 πkT
E λ= 4 , where k is Boltzmann Constant.
λ
On the basis of quantum theory of heat radiations Plank (1901) was able to
derive theoretical expression for the energy distributions. Radiant energy is
regarded as atomic in structure consisting of discreet particles called ‘photons’
that retains their total stock of energy unimpaired throughout their flight in
space and may be broken up during their encounter with matter.
Each photon has energy equal to the product of h and ν, i.e. hν; where h is
Plank’s constant and ν is frequency of radiations. Plank’s law of black body
radiation describes the following three specific properties of photons.
Using the density states and the Bose-Einstein distribution function for
photons, we find the number of photons dnv, with frequencies between ν and
v+dν to be
1 8 πV 3
d n v= E 3
ν dν (1)
c
e −1
kT
Each photon has energy E = hν, so the amount of energy, d Ev carried by the d n v
photons is
3
8 πVh v
d uv =hvd n v = 3 E (2)
c kT
e −1
d E v 8 πh v 3 1
u v dv= = 3
. E
dv (3)
V c kT
e −1
c
This is called Plank’s radiation rule. In terms of wavelength; using v= λ and
|dv|=
| |
−c
λ2
dλ
8 πhc dλ
u λ dλ= .
Therefore λ
5 E
hc (4)
e λkT
−1
With the help of Plank’s law Wein’s and Rayleigh-Jean’s law can be derived as
( )
−hc
8 πhc λkT
E λ dλ= 5
e dλ (5)
λ
8 πkT
E λ dλ= 4
dλ (6).
λ
Wave and Particle Duality or Dual Nature of Particle
Considering the above facts, it is accepted that the radiation some time behave
as a wave and other times as a particle. This is called wave particle duality.
Here it should be remembered that radiation cannot exhibit its particle and
wave properties simultaneously. On the basis of phenomena like, interference,
diffraction and polarisation, it was established that light is a kind of wave
motion. But the phenomena like photoelectric effect, Compton effect explain
the light have particle character. Thus, light has dual character. It is worthy to
note that wave and particle never expected to appear together.
Louis de-Broglie in 1924 extended the wave particle parallelism. de- Broglie put
a bold suggestion that like radiation, matter has also a dual characteristic.
According to de- Broglie hypothesis, a moving particle is associated with a
wave which is known as de- Broglie wave. The wavelength of matter waves is
given by
h h
λ= =
mv p
In 1926, Schrodinger gave the idea of de- Broglie a mathematical form, in 1927,
Davisson and Germer and independently in 1928, G.P. Thompson discovered
electron diffraction by crystal which finally proved the wave nature of
electrons.
Matter waves
Louis de- Broglie proposed that matter also possess dual character like light. It
was based on following facts:
1- Matter and light, both are forms of energy and each of them can be
transformed into the other.
2- Both are governed by the space time symmetries of the theory of
relativity.
2 hc h h
mc = or λ= i.e., λ=
λ mc p
h
Then wavelength λ= .
√2 meV
4- For electron m= 9.1×10-31kg and e = 1.6×10-19 c.
6.62× 10−34 12, 27 0
Then λ= = A.
√2 × 9.1×10−31 ×1.6 ×10−19 √V
velocity v is always less than the velocity of light, it follows that the
velocity of propagation of the associated matter wave is greater than c.
6- The velocity of matter wave is not constant like the radiations which
move with constant velocity equal to velocity of light. The velocity of
matter wave depends upon the velocity of material particle.
7- The wave and particle aspects of matter never appear simultaneously in
some experiments.
8- de- Broglie wave are not electromagnetic waves. Following observations
confirms this fact;
(a) The de-Broglie wave are associated with the moving particle
irrespective of whether the particles are charged or not,
electromagnetic waves are produced only by accelerating charged
particles.
(b) The velocity of de-Broglie wave is depending upon the velocity of
material particles. However, velocity of electromagnetic wave is
constant in a given medium.
(c) de-Broglie waves travel faster as compared to electromagnetic wave.
h
According to the de-Broglie hypothesis, λ= mv , de- Broglie proposed an
atomic model in which stationary orbits of the Bohr’s model were retained, but
with the difference that electron in various orbits behaves as wave.
2 πr =nλ (n = 1, 2, 3,….)
h
But, λ=
mv
h
So , 2πr ¿ n . mv
h
Or mvr=n
2π
mvr is angular momentum of the electron as particle, hence above equation is
nothing but, the Bohr’s postulates i.e., the total angular momentum of the
h
moving electron is an integral multiple of 2 π .
𝛗=A+iB
Conjugate of 𝛗 is 𝛗* i.e., 𝛗* = A – iB
So 𝛗 𝛗* = |φ| = A2 + B2
2
∫ |φ| dV =1
2
−∞
∫ x |φ| dx ∫ φ¿ xφ dx
2
⟨ x ⟩= −∞+∞ = −∞
+∞
∫ |φ| dx ∫ φ¿ φ dx
2
−∞ −∞
If 𝛗 is a normalised wave function, then
+∞
∫ φ¿ φ dx=1
−∞
Hence ⟨ x ⟩= ∫ x|φ| dx .
+∞
2
−∞
(1)
2
2 1 ∂ φ
∇ φ− 2 2
=0
v ∂t
∂φ −iωt
=−iω φ0 e
∂t
(4)
2
2 ω
∇ φ+ 2
φ=0
v
Or (5)
2 2 2
2 4π m v
∇ φ+ 2
φ=0
h
E = 2 m v +V or 2m (E -V)= m2 v 2
1 2
as
(6)
2m(E−V )
∇ 2 φ+ φ=0
ħ2
(7)
2 2m E
∇ φ+ 2
φ=0
ħ
(1)
2
2 1 ∂ φ
∇ φ− 2 2
=0
v ∂t
𝛗 = 𝛗0 e−iωt (2)
= - iω 𝛗
∂φ −iωt
=−iω φ0 e
∂t
Or = −i 2 π h φ
( ) (since E = hv)
∂φ E
=−i ( 2 πν ) φ
∂t
(4)
2m(Eφ−Vφ)
∇ 2 φ+ =0
ħ2
(5)
∂φ
2m(i ħ −Vφ)
∂t
∇ 2 φ+ 2
=0
ħ
=0 or (6).
∂φ
2m(i ħ ) 2 2m ∂ φ
∂t ∇ φ+ i =0
∇ 2 φ+ 2 ħ ∂t
ħ
(1)
2m(Eφ−Vφ)
∇ 2 φ+ =0
ħ2
As V = 0, between the walls, hence the equation (1) will get
the form as
(2)
2 2m E
∇ φ+ 2
φ=0
ħ
Let
2m E 2
2
=k
ħ
0 = A Sin 0 + B Cos 0
i.e. B = 0; so φ ( x )= A sinkx
again, φ=0 at x = L.
or (5)
nπ
k=
L
Or 2 =
2
2 2 2 2 2 h
n π ħ n π 2
E= 4π
2m L 2
2m L
Or (n = 1, 2, 3,…..)
2 2
nh
En = 2
8m L
(6)
∫|φ( x )| dx = 1
L
2
Or dx = 1
L
∫ A 2 sin2 nπx
L
0
Or dx = 1 or [ ] dx = 1
L L
nπx
A ∫ sin
2
L
2
A
2
∫ 12 1−cos
2 nπx
L
0 0
Or [ ] or
L
A2 L 2 nπx 2
A L
x− sin =1 =1
2 2 πn L 0 2
Hence A=
√ 2
L
Therefore,
(7)
φ ( x )=
√ 2
L
sin
nπx
L
Compton Effect
American scientist, A.H. Compton (1923) confirms about particle nature of
light. He discovered that, ‘when a beam of monochromatic radiation (X-rays) of
sharply defined frequency (lower wavelength) were incident on a material of
low atomic number (the carbon atom), the rays suffered a change of frequency
(higher wavelength) on scattering. The change of wavelength is due to loss of
energy of incident x-rays.’ Also, the electron of light atom is displaced with
change energy and momentum. This phenomenon is called Compton effect, and
the change in wavelength of scattered to incident X-rays is called Compton
shifts. If λ is the wavelength of incident X-ray and λ ’ is the wavelength of
scattered X-ray, then change in wavelength Δ λ is called Compton shift.
Refer to diagram,
There are ten terms which are important for deriving the expression for
Compton shift. These are;
X-ray photon strike with an electron (assumed it was at rest) and is scattered
away from the original direction of motion. The strike of photon to electron is
total elastic collision. Therefore, this collision follows two fundamental
conservation principle as (i) Conservation principle of energy and (ii)
Conservation principle of momentum.
2 ' 2
Or hv +m0 c =h v +m c
'
hv hv
+ 0= cos ∅ +m v cos θ
c c
'
hv
0+ 0= sin ∅ −m v sin θ
c
2 2 2 2 2
m v c =h v + h v −2 h v v cos ∅
2 '2 2 '
(4)
⟶m=
m0 2 2
m= m0 c
√
2 2
v
1− ( c 2−v 2)
c2
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 4
or m c −m v =m0 c → m c −m v c =m0 c (5)
m c =[ h ( v−v ) +m 0 c ]
2
2 4 ' 2
2
=h2 ( v−v ' ) +m20 c 4 +2 h ( v −v ' ) m0 c 2
Putting the value of m2 c 4 from equation (6) and the value of m2 v 2 c2 from
equation (4) in equation (5), we get
h2 v 2 +h 2 v' 2−2 h2 v v ' +m20 c 4 +2 h ( v −v ' ) m0 c 2−h2 v 2−h2 v '2 +2 h2 v v ' cos ∅ =m20 c 4
( v −v ' ) h
'
= 2
( 1−cos ∅ )
vv m0 c
( 1−cos ∅ )⟶
'
1 1 h λ −λ h (
Or − = = 1−cos ∅ )
v v m0 c
' 2 2
c m0 c
' h
Hence, λ −λ= Δλ= ( 1−cos ∅ ) (7)
m0 c
Δλ=0.0242 ( 1−cos ∅ )
Which is required expression for Compton shift. From above equation (7) some
important facts can be noted:
'
h v sin ∅
'
m v c sin θ=h v sin ∅ or sin θ=
mvc
' '
h v sin ∅ v sin∅
Therefore, tanθ= '
= ' (8)
hv−h v cos ∅ v−v cos ∅
1 1 h
We know that (as per above equations) − = ( 1−cos ∅ )
v v m0 c
' 2
1 1 h 1 h 2∅
Or = + ( 1−cos ∅ ) = v + m c 2 .2 sin 2
v v m0 c
' 2
0
( )
h 2∅ ' v
1+ . 2 sin v=
( )
2
Or 1 m0 c 2 or hv 2∅
= 1+ 2
. 2 sin
v' v m0 c 2
(9)
Putting the value of v’ from equation (9) to equation (8) we can get,
vSin ∅
tanθ=
1+
hv
(
m0 c 2
. 2 sin2
∅
2 ) or
vCos ∅
v−
1+
hv
m0 c (
2
. 2sin 2
∅
2 )
sin ∅
tanθ=
1+
( hv
m0 c
2
.2 sin
2∅
2 )
−cos ∅
∅ ∅ ∅ ∅
cos 2sin 2 sin
cos
2 2 2 2
Or tanθ= =
1+
hv
m0 c2
( ∅
.2 sin2 −1+ 2sin 2
2
∅
2 ) 2sin 2
∅ hv
2 m0 c 2[+1
]
∅ ∅
cos cot
2 2
Hence tanθ= = . (10)
sin
∅ hv
2 m0 c 2
+1
[hv
m0 c 2
+1
][ ]
Kinetic energy of Recoil electron (maximum)
h 2h
Also, ( λ −λ ) = m c ( 1−cos ∅ )= m c ( For maximum KE)
'
0 0
2h
2 2
2h v
2
2h v m0 cv
KE= = = .
( ) ( )
Or 2h c 2h m0 c ( m0 c 2+ 2hv )
m0 λ λ + m0 c +
m0 c λ m0 c
2 2
2h v
2
m0 c
Thus KE= (12).
2 hv
1+ 2
m0 c