Understanding General Intelligence Factors
Understanding General Intelligence Factors
Human beings have differences and similarities. Among the characteristics that distinguish us
this is intelligence, personality, skills, interests, behavior, among others.
Different studies have been conducted on intelligence, deriving inputs to define it, based on
in its characteristics, the way to measure it, the factors that constitute it; however, each construct
The focus has been more on how to measure it than on validating the proposed definition.
From a classical approach, intelligence has been considered an unmodifiable factor and against a
current approach that considers various types of intelligence modifiable by experience.
The G factor (also known as general intelligence, general mental capacity, or factor of
General intelligence is a parameter or indicator of cognitive abilities and human intelligence.
The general intelligence of a person basically refers to their ability to perceive the environment,
to reason, solve problems, and act efficiently and effectively in a given situation.
Some researchers argue that the notion of general intelligence or factor G is illusory, that it does not
such global mental capacity exists and that the apparent 'intelligence' is just a byproduct of the
opportunities for one to learn valued skills and information in a particular cultural context.
It is true that theconcept of intelligenceand the way in which individuals are classified according to
this criterion could have a very significant social deviation. But the fact that factor G is not
specific to no particular domain of knowledge or mental skill, suggests that this is
independent of cultural content, including beliefs about what intelligence is. Furthermore, the
Tests from different social groups reveal the same continuum of general intelligence.
Anyway, the notion that a person's intelligence can be measured and summarized in a
a solitary number obtained through an intelligence quotient test has been very
controversial. Some psychologists, includingThurstone, they challenged the concept of a G factor. Thurstone
instead identified a number of what he called 'primary mental abilities'.
Galton (1822-1911) was one of the first to be interested in studying the differences in ability.
mental, sought to demonstrate that such differences are innate.
Ebbinghaus in 1885 considered intelligence as the ability to solve problems and to adapt.
to the middle.
In 1890, Catell invents mental tests to turn psychology into an applied science.
In 1905, Alfred Binet, for whom intelligence manifests in the speed with which one learns over time
deadline, was the first to make attempts to measure intelligence through tests that in form
staggered increased in difficulty and were passed on to the students according to their age,
originating the concept of 'metal age'. It is due to him that the controversy arises over whether it is due to one or many.
factors affecting intelligence performance.
After Eysenck (1938), he arrives at a factorized intelligence model, in which he forces the results.
to conclude according to the proposals of psychology. It adds to the study of intelligence,
Guilford (1967) indicates that it is necessary to categorize the factors found.
Until 1970, this type of testing has fallen into disrepute, claiming that they are only interested in the
cognitive component, measure only linguistic and logical-mathematical intelligence,
considered too limited. It can be classified in the attempts to define intelligence in
three models: those focused on seeking the factors that comprise intelligence, the models
focused on the mental processes that drive intelligence (its cognitive functioning) and the
models centered on understanding the development of individuals in society.
From here, psychology focuses on investigating how the mind processes and records information.
Piaget, Vygotsky, Brunner, Wallon, with their evolutionary approaches, and Eysenck, White, Catell, Vemon,
Jensen... among the qualitative approaches.
Notable is Piaget (1896-1980), who is interested in the biological and logical origin of intelligence.
Vigotsky for the potential development of intelligence, indicating that human development is based on the
maturity and learning, in their social activity.
Salovey and Mayer (1990) introduced the concept of emotional intelligence and it is popularized by Daniel J.
Goleman in 1995.
For Raven (1991), author of the Raven Progressive Matrices Test, General Scale MPG (of approach
classic), the factor g can be measured by obtaining new information and the ability to
reproduce it.
Son R. J. 1985, Salovey, P. and Mayer, J.D. 1990) who indicate the need to reformulate the concept
of intelligence in terms of what makes a person focus their life more appropriately.
According to Gardner (1983, 1993), intelligence is the "ability to solve problems or create products that
valuable in one or more cultures,” introducing the concept of Multiple Intelligences.
This theory indicates that intelligence is made up of a series of capabilities, factors that enable
its operations, the general factor fgy and the specific factor ofs.
These factors are grouped into intrapersonal, bodily, spatial, logical, musical, and interpersonal.
The general factor measures intelligence to solve any problem and the specific factor for
to resolve a specific task. These specific factors are grouped into different groups.
To conduct the factorial analysis of intelligence, different tests are applied and the correlation is analyzed.
Among the results, it is observed that elements relate to each other and which are the Spearman's.
Thurstone.
Charles Spearman (1863–1945) psychologist, disciple of Wilhelm Wundt, the father of psychology
experimentaland was influenced by Galton's work. Based on Galton's studies, Charles
Spearman coins the term general intelligence.
For Spearman, intelligence is made up of factors, the general factor and the specific factors.
The general factor (ability to abstract and deduce), this intelligence intervenes in various activities.
but it does not specialize in any of them (for different tasks); in his thesis, Spearman indicates that the
You generate a potential genetic energy that differs in all individuals.
Some divide generic factors into several specific ones. For example: the verbal factor is subdivided
in verbal comprehension factor and in verbal fluency factor.
According to her Bifactorial Theory, to measure the performance of school-aged children, she conducts a
correlation between the results they obtain in the sensory tests he administers and the results
academics who They obtain. It establishes that Sensory Intelligence can be measured with the
discrimination of sensory capacity, which Galton had proposed. The criticisms of this theory are
they act on cultural bias, academic level, geographic location, economic position.
Thurstone denies the existence of a G factor, seeking to discover the factors involved in work.
intellectual. applying new statistical techniques finds that mental aptitude tests are
product of several factors. Develops its multifactorial theory based on Spearman's theory.
Spatial Aptitude: It encompasses the cognitive skills to work manually with objects.
the space by visualizing them, orienting them, transforming them from different perspectives. With
Frequency divides spatial aptitude into basic factors.
Perceptual speed: it is the ability to discriminate different elements, with great speed and accuracy.
Numerical aptitude
The application of inductive deductive reasoning in situations where the number must be used.
to solve a problem. Mainly with basic operations.
Verbal comprehension V:
Tests that aim to measure the verbal ability to understand what is read or written.
ability to abstract meanings from symbols. It would include vocabulary, semantics, syntax
or the pragmatics.
MemoriaM:
Verbal fluency
They measure the speed of speaking, to give a speech, considering a fluency of 90 as normal.
words per minute.
Inductive Reasoning I or R:
They measure a person's ability to reflect, organize, and conclude their ideas.
Thurstone's contribution provides the basis for analyzing tests from their theoretical foundation, to have clarity.
in what is measured with them.
EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE
Daniel Goleman from Harvard University promotes the concept of emotional intelligence. He states
What is known as intelligence does not determine success or a happy life; that this ability does not
is determined by the cognitive ability of the person.
The concept would consist of the knowledge of one's own emotions, the ability to
controlling emotions, the ability to motivate oneself, the recognition of emotions
foreign and the ability to control relationships with others.
Understanding self-regulation as the management of one's own emotional states, assuming the
responsibilities and flexibility to handle changing situations.
Self-awareness to identify one's own emotions and recognize our strengths and limitations,
with a strong sense of our worth as individuals.
The motivation expressed in pursuing the achievement of goals, the effort to improve, and reacting to the
opportunities.
Social skills that involve leading others towards the responses we wish to obtain.
Spearman's theory attempts to link sensory capacities to intellectual performance by correlating sensory tests with academic results, proposing that a child's ability in sensory discrimination correlates with their intelligence level. These tests measure the sensory capacity through performance metrics, suggesting that those with superior sensory discrimination tend to achieve better academically, indirectly measuring the general intelligence factor (G).
Spearman's theory of intelligence proposes the existence of a general intelligence factor, known as factor G, which indicates a person's overall cognitive capability. Spearman also identifies specific factors that correspond to different skills, such as verbal, numerical, and spatial factors. In contrast, Thurstone's theory denies the existence of a singular G factor. Instead, he identifies multiple primary mental abilities, such as spatial aptitude, perceptual speed, numerical aptitude, verbal comprehension, and memory, forming a multifactorial perspective on intelligence .
Critics argue that traditional intelligence testing often focuses too narrowly on linguistic and logical-mathematical components, neglecting other forms of intelligence. This limited scope is often criticized for cultural bias, as well as for failing to account for environmental influences and personal experiences. As a result, the validity of these tests is questioned regarding their ability to truly measure an individual's intellectual capacity comprehensively and fairly .
Daniel Goleman's concept of emotional intelligence differs from traditional intelligence measures by focusing on non-cognitive abilities. It encompasses self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills. These components address how individuals manage emotions, motivate themselves, and handle relationships, differing from traditional cognitive measures, which largely focus on logical, verbal, and mathematical skills .
Gardner's theory of Multiple Intelligences expands the definition of intelligence by proposing that intelligence is not a single ability measured by traditional linguistic and logical-mathematical skills. Instead, it comprises a variety of distinct capabilities such as interpersonal, intrapersonal, bodily-kinesthetic, spatial, musical, and others. This broader view acknowledges diverse talents and skills across cultures, challenging the narrow focus of traditional intelligence models .
Spearman's Bifactorial Theory measures intelligence by correlating sensory test results with academic performance results in school-aged children. This approach incorporates sensory intelligence, which is measured using the discrimination of sensory capacity. Sensory tests evaluate abilities like verbal, numerical, spatial, and mechanical factors, viewed through the lens of a general intelligence factor (G) alongside specific skills (S factors).
According to Daniel Goleman, the main components of emotional intelligence are self-regulation, self-awareness, motivation, empathy, and social skills. These components contribute to personal effectiveness by enhancing emotional management and self-motivation, while professional effectiveness is enhanced through empathy and social skills, enabling better teamwork and leadership. Emotional intelligence helps in reacting positively to stress and tension, leading to improved work performance .
Critics of Spearman's Bifactorial Theory argue that the theory can be biased by cultural factors, such as academic level, geographic location, and economic position. This suggests that performance on intelligence tests might be influenced by external circumstances more than by inherent cognitive abilities, potentially leading to inaccurate assessments of an individual's general intelligence (factor G).
The introduction of emotional intelligence implies a shift in understanding human intelligence by emphasizing non-cognitive skills paramount to personal and professional success. It highlights competencies such as emotional regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills, suggesting these abilities are crucial in navigating life effectively. This broadens the traditional lens focused mainly on linguistic and logical reasoning, promoting a more holistic view of intelligence that accounts for emotional and social complexities .
Theories suggest that intelligence can be modifiable, countering traditional views of it as a static trait. Factors contributing to this change include experience, learning, and social activity, as outlined by theorists like Piaget and Vygotsky. Emotional intelligence, as defined by Daniel Goleman, also suggests that emotional skills can be improved through personal development practices. This notion contrasts the fixed view of intelligence and suggests a multifaceted construct adaptable to various influences .