Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Ministry of Higher Education

Simón Rodríguez National Experimental University
Chair: Study Method and Technique
Hector Lozada

SYSTEMATIC STUDY

Participant:
DAVID LOPEZ

Caracas, October 2018

 INTRODUCTION

It can be said that in the speech of a systematic study it is done

reference to the relations exam in the attempt to attribute causes and effects
and base our conclusions on scientific evidence, that is, on data
gathered under controlled conditions, as well as measured and interpreted from
reasonably rigorous manner. This systematic study replaces the
intuition, which is that feeling not necessarily supported by the
investigations.
There are many intelligent and hardworking students who pass.
the subjects, but they do not achieve satisfactory performance. In other words,
way: they do not know how to make the most of their ability and to their
effort (each student must perform according to their abilities
personal). This is due to the fact that they use deficient study procedures.
(they will surely incur in some of the bad habits that we will see more)
forward), therefore the students are always in change, not
However, work groups are formed for this purpose. Where the work is done.
Question: Study alone or with someone? It depends on the subjects to study.
and the individual. Collaborating with colleagues is very positive, but we must
do it right and avoid the risks derived from studying with classmates.
 Systematics is the science that studies diversity as
consequence of its evolutionary history and establishes the basic information for
discover and reconstruct biological patterns and generate hypotheses to explain
the processes that produce these patterns. It is the science that seeks a
order in nature.
There are basically two ways to classify organisms:
a) based on their functional characteristics, or
b) based on their evolutionary relationships. The combination of both
always yields good results for generating interesting hypotheses about the
history of the tree of life.
With the development of phylogenetic methods, it is now easier.
separating the phylogenetic component of variation from the variation resulting from
the function.
Some of the benefits of systematic approach are; the discovery of
new things (such as medicines, foods, etc.), the prediction of new
things and add information that we know about organisms,
including its uses.
One of the most serious problems faced by Systematics
is based on its foundations that originated in the Linnaean system of
classification. It poses a problem because this system was conceived in a
a world where the concept of evolution did not exist but rather the concept of creation.

That is, Linnaeus developed his binomial classification system believing

firmly that God had created all forms of life, more
specifically, I believed that God had originally formed a pair of
organisms for each species (and one only for asexual species), of
so that all the organisms that formed later were
descendants of that original pair. From this perspective, the diversity of
the planet has always been the same, and if any systematic describes a new one
the species is because it has just been discovered, but the species has always been
has existed, that is, it has existed since God created it originally.
With the arrival of the Darwinian revolution, whose greatest impact was
introduce the concept of evolution, that is, of change, of transformation
in organisms, many disciplines, such as genetics, were revolutionized and
they advanced deeply. Charles Darwin, in "The Origin" (1859), explained
numerous phenomena consistent with a theory of common ancestry, and
that were inexplicable or at least whimsical under the argument
of a 'special creation'.

However, for some reason, the Systematics continued exactly

just like since 1753 when Linnaeus published his famous book 'Species
"Plantae", that is, assuming that the organisms had been created.
originally by a God and that since that primordial time they had been maintained
immutables. The most serious thing is that even in 2005 (146 years later)
Darwin's publication), a large proportion of the Systematists of the planet
follows the Linnaean classification system closely, and only until a few
30 years, Systematics has begun to consolidate as a science with
an evolutionary theoretical framework, based on the establishment of hypotheses of

ancestor-descendance to reconstruct the patterns of the tree of life.

Study techniques or study strategies are different.
perspectives applied to learning. They are generally critical for
achieving success in school,[] they are considered essential to achieve
good grades, and they are useful for lifelong learning;
There are a variety of study techniques that can focus on
process of organizing and taking new information, among those techniques
we found the systematic study, formulation of a procedure in
group and study teams or groups.
 The systematics in the study as a method:

These study techniques can be learned and applied

practice with ease, generally in a short period, are applied to
almost all fields of study. Consequently, it must
to distinguish them from those that are specific to a particular field of
study, for example music or technology, and of inherent skills in
student, such as aspects of intelligence and learning style.

Systematic Study

It is the reference to the relationship exam in the attempt to attribute

causes and effects and base our conclusions on scientific evidence, is
to say, in data gathered under controlled conditions, as well as measured and
interpreted in a reasonably rigorous manner. This study
systematically replaces intuition, which is that feeling not necessarily
supported by research. This method of systematic study has
has been considered as a top-tier aid in many universities
North Americans; EPLRR is an acronym that encompasses the five moments or
fundamental phases of this methodological process: Explore, Ask,
Read, Recite, and Review.

An example of this study is the teaching that is imparted in the

schools; this is systematic because the teacher teaches a subject
drawing on methods, examples, research, comparison, exercises,
synoptic charts, text interpretation, etc. It differs from the
unsystematic because the individual reads on their own, without methodology.

Formulation of a group procedure

 It is a technique that integrates and groups techniques directly.
involved in the study process itself; such as the planning of
that activity, the underlining, the summary, the elaboration of diagrams, etc.;
as well as other strategies that have a more complementary nature,
how note-taking or completing school assignments can be.
All of this is accompanied by a series of metacognitive strategies.
(monitoring of task execution) that are present in them (of
more or less consciously) in this entire study process: self
questioning, use of analogies, supervision and regulation of the self
execution, etc.

Regarding the teaching of these techniques, both the psychology of

learning (particularly the "constructivist" conception stemming from the
cognitive psychology), like educational practice, agree in considering the
modeling and teaching molding as the most didactic strategies
suitable for promoting an effective and deep learning of those
strategies.
It is a process by which seemingly related facts are connected.
isolated and a theory is formulated that unifies the various elements. It consists of
in the rational meeting of several dispersed elements into a new whole,
this is more present in the formulation of the hypothesis. The researcher
synthesize the improvements in imagination to provide an explanation
attempt that will be put to the test. Also as systematic thinking
we found that it is a method that consists of identifying some rules,
some series of patterns and events to prepare us for the future
to influence in some way. It is aimed at modeling the object through the
determination of its components, as well as the relationships between them.
These relationships determine on one hand the structure of the object and on the other its

dynamic.
 The systemic method would be an order manifested by rules,
that would allow us to have a systemic understanding of a situation
dada. Whoever attempts to use the systemic method must: 1) Know the
fundamental characteristics of the system (or subsystem) under study:
components, environment, and structure, using for this purpose the concepts and
basic archetypes provided by systemic thinking. In the cases that
it will be necessary to consider the possibility of deepening knowledge
of the structure through mathematical means that contribute to the disciplines

linked to the General Theory of Systems.

2) Being able to differentiate between the properties of the system, what are they?

resultant and which are emergent and define what the attractor state of the
system (if I had one).
3) Integrate the particular fact under analysis into the system in its
set.
Interpret the fact within the structure and evolution of the system.

What is Behavior
Organizational behavior is a field of study in which
the impact that individuals, groups, and structures have on the
behavior within organizations, with the aim of applying these
knowledge to improve the effectiveness of such organizations. It is a
scientific discipline that constantly adds to its knowledge base
a large amount of research and conceptual developments. But
it is also an applied science, since information about practices
effective in an organization can extend to many others and thus leave
the departmental ismo.

It is a field of study because it is a defined specialty and with

a common set of knowledge that studies three determinants of
behavior of organizations: individuals, groups, and structure.
Apply the knowledge gained about individuals, groups, and the
effect of structure on behavior, with the aim of improving
functioning in organizations. Organizational behavior is
particularly interested in situations that concern employment.

Procedure Design

The Design of Procedures consists of describing the way or route

required to execute a Process, sequentially indicating the
activities, their breakdown into tasks, the methods to carry them out
those tasks and the person responsible for their execution, in order to
standardize the method for carrying out tasks, define roles,
Responsibilities and opportunity for intervention within the process, and
interactions between positions and dependencies.

Study Techniques: Concept, Types, and Applications.

Study techniques are a set of procedures that help us

allow us to improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of our studies and
learning in a specific area. For greater clarity, we have
classified into categories that can help you understand them better and
adapt them to the specific context in which you may need them. We have to
to say that almost all effective study techniques are based on
take advantage of the innate principles of learning, especially attention,
the association, the order, the categorization, the visualization and the
conceptualization. On the other hand, we like to make a distinction between
study strategy and study technique. A study strategy is a
behavior plan to address the material we need to study.
A technique is a tool to continue with that plan.
 TYPES OF STUDY TECHNIQUES:
Study planning techniques:

They are instruments that allow us to plan our sessions.

study in the most optimal way. Here you can find:
Personal productivity techniques
Time management techniques
Habit development techniques.

Study techniques of synthesis:

They allow us to summarize the study material in the best way.
suitable for study and to retain the most important information and
relevant.

Development of concepts and categorization

Keyword search
Preparation of summaries
Concept maps
Mind maps

Execution study techniques:

They allow us to improve the very act of studying and executing the
most appropriate actions for learning the material. Mnemonics
how the following would fit into this category:

Keywords
Peer association
Hanging systems
Mental associations
Acronyms
 Study techniques integrated into a study strategy:
The best way to make use of all these techniques is
use them within the framework of a study strategy adapted to our
needs. It is very important to define what our objective will be in
our study to outline a strategy that leads us to its achievement.

Using these techniques without being clear about where we are heading can
It will be beneficial but will be light-years away from the results we will achieve.

if we apply a well-designed strategy, tailored to our situation

personal and knowing how and when to use each technique in the best way
possible. If we lack a study strategy adapted to our
needs is like lacking the recipe to prepare a meal.
We can have some extraordinary ingredients but we couldn't cook.
nothing if we do not know how to combine them and prepare them.
 CONCLUSION

The fundamental purpose of this work is to gain a deep understanding of the

concept of systematic study to gain advantages in certain things
like a good organizational capability in study methods and
create a good environment in the university space since when I say study
systematic we refer to making reference to the examination of relationships in the
attempt to attribute causes and effects and base our conclusions on
scientific tests, that is, data collected under controlled conditions,
as well as measured and interpreted in a reasonably rigorous manner.
Although there is a mistake of certain trends that suppress the value of
effort and method in university study, under the pretext of doing it
more comfortable and pleasant and addresses the analysis of the concept of study

systematic, as well as its impact on university education, level for

the one who judges the most suitable logical teaching methods in
contrary to the psychological ones that, although not completely disposable, are
considered more typical of the early stages of education.
 BIBLIOGRAPHIES

Spanish Journal of Pedagogy. 1985 University

International of The Rioja (UNIR).
Invalid input. Please provide a text for translation.
seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Biblio3.2009. Study, analysis, and design of procedures.
The provided text is a URL and does not contain translatable content.
Marilyn Bernal Prado. From [Link]. Procedure for
to develop studies markets in organizations
Unable to access content from the provided link.
_market_studies_in_organizations/.
Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso. 2018 System of
Library Methods y Techniques of Research

[Link].