Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Planning
Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Planning
Planning step 3
How do we get there?
What can be done with available resources? Having identified
objectives for the diagnosis and treatment programme, the
next step is to formulate an action plan to achieve them.
A template for developing a detailed action plan is provided at
[Link] i
www
22
Planning step 3
Table 6 provides examples of actions to bridge gaps in cancer control that would be
appropriate in a low-income country. In this particular case, the decision has been made to
prioritize early diagnosis (i.e. increase awareness of early signs and symptoms) of breast
and cervical cancers, and the diagnosis and treatment of all patients identified by the early
detection activities, as well as all children presenting with acute lymphatic leukaemia. The
country has chosen to implement activities gradually, both in terms of the location of the
target population (i.e. activities will initially target patients identified through the formal
health system before widening contact through community outreach schemes) and their
geographical scope (i.e. if successful in a demonstration area, programme activities will be
expanded to other areas, and ultimately to the whole country).
To make sure that the necessary human, physical and financial resources are available to
implement the diagnosis and treatment programme, the following questions need to be
answered:
p What resources are currently dedicated to cancer control?
p What resources are specifically allocated to diagnosis and treatment?
p How can current resources be reallocated or shared to achieve the objectives of the
diagnosis and treatment programme?
p Besides resources currently being expended for diagnosis and treatment, what else is
needed to achieve the objectives of the diagnosis and treatment programme?
p What potential sources (internal and external) of funding or other resources are available
to meet these needs?
p How can partners work together to raise funds from government or the private
sector?
23
diagnosis and treatment
24
Planning step 3
A major policy issue is how to ensure adequate and equitable resource mobilization for health
care. Different forms of health system financing exist, which vary in terms of how resources
are generated, pooled and used.
The diagnosis and treatment component of a national cancer control plan should be accessible
to a large majority of people with cancers that are curable or treatable but not curable. Also,
services should be delivered in an equitable manner. In a low-income country, if diagnosis
and treatment activities are too ambitious – involving costly interventions and sophisticated
technologies – it will not be possible to implement the plan even if there is political will and
commitment. For example, the scarce resources of low-income countries are often dedicated
to ineffective treatment of advanced cancer patients, even though many of the cancers would
have been amenable to early detection. If, instead, advanced cancer patients were to receive
good quality and low-cost palliative care, a significant amount of resources could be reallocated
to early detection, diagnosis and treatment of people with curable cancers. This in itself would
eventually reduce the numbers of people with advanced cancers.
25
diagnosis and treatment
The above list of actions, which is based on WHO’s health system building blocks, involves
processes of different levels of complexity. WHO recommends a stepwise implementation,
based on the availability of resources and adapted to the particular conditions in the
country.
26
Planning step 3
The majority of advanced cancer patients will need simple diagnostic procedures (microscopic
verification or imaging) and approximately 20% may benefit from palliative surgery,
radiotherapy, chemotherapy or other procedures which can improve their quality of life to a
certain extent (Sausville, Longo, 2005). Table 7 provides examples of the uses of palliative
surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy in advanced cancer patients.
27
diagnosis and treatment
nicaragua
Model programme for cancer treatment in a low-income country
The decision to organize the Diagnosis and Care Programme A new project was launched in 2007 to decentralize and
for Children with Cancer in Nicaragua, the second poorest coordinate haemato-oncology care in other departments of
country in Latin America, was taken over 20 years ago, during the hospital. This project aims to decrease delays in diagnosis,
a period of great political and social instability. The decision continue to reduce abandonment of treatment, improve
was based on the principle that Nicaraguan children have the treatment compliance, and care for terminally ill patients. Each
same right as those from developed countries to be cured type of cancer is treated according to international evidence-
of diseases – not only diseases of poverty, but also other based protocols, adapted to the local context. From the
diseases, such as cancer. The right to health care cannot be beginning, the multidisciplinary teams that provide care have
denied. It is a basic human right, as fundamental as the right adopted a holistic and psychosocial approach.
to life.
Because the role of the nursing staff is of vital importance in
The Diagnosis and Care Programme for Children with Cancer caring for children with cancer, two specific programmes have
was planned to provide long-term services. Although the been developed, one on quality of nursing, the other on nursing
initial focus was on acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, a leadership. These programmes have helped to motivate nurses
frequently curable and relatively common childhood cancer, and have facilitated their training.
provision was made to eventually include the full range of
childhood cancers in the programme. A strategic alliance has been formed between the health
professionals, CONANCA and the Association of Parents of
A twinning arrangement was agreed between an oncology Children with Cancer. This alliance has sensitized health
centre in Monza, Italy, and the children’s hospital, La Mascota, authorities, as well as governmental and nongovernmental
in Nicaragua. This has proved to be a rewarding experience organizations to the importance of diagnosing and treating
for health-care teams in both Italy and Nicaragua. Initially, cancer. The alliance has also contributed to mobilizing
seven paediatricians were trained in haemato-oncology at resources for the programme.
the Haemato-oncology Centre of San Gerardo Hospital in
Monza. Training was also provided – at different centres – for The programme at La Mascota has provided a model for the
a surgical oncologist, two pathologists and seven nurses, as development of other services within Nicaragua and beyond.
well as laboratory and pathology technicians. Subsequently, Programme sustainability allowed for the creation of Monza’s
facilities to provide care to children with cancer were set up International School of Paediatric Haemato-oncology (MISPHO)
in Nicaragua. in 1996, with the participation of 14 Latin American countries, to
promote twinning programmes similar to the one in Nicaragua
Various sources of funding were identified, both at the and assist in the training of the participating doctors. Following
national and international levels, to ensure the financial the subsequent founding of the Central American Association
independence and long-term sustainability of the programme. of Paediatric Haemato-oncology (AHOPCA), there has been a
At present, there are 32 beds, an operating room, a day real interaction between the haemato-oncology centres in the
hospital for outpatients, a haematology laboratory and a participating countries.
hostel that provides accommodation for patients who live far
Sources: Masera G et al. (2006). Twinning between pediatric
from the centre. Antineoplastic drugs and support therapy hematology-oncology centres in low-and high income countries:
are provided by the Nicaraguan Committee for Supporting 20 years of collaboration between Italy and Latin America. Educational
Children with Cancer (CONANCA). All patients are treated free Book. Congress of American Society of Clinical Oncology, USA.
of charge. Additional information supplied by Dr Fulgencio Baez, Department of
Haematology-oncology, Children’s Hospital La Mascota, Nicaragua.
28
Planning step 3
WHO recommends that the less complex diagnosis and treatment services are located in
places that are easily accessible to the target groups at the district level. The more complex
and specialized services can be centralized at the regional or national level, where the
expertise and more sophisticated technologies are concentrated and can be provided in a
sustainable manner. Collaborative networks of professionals, working in diagnosis, treatment,
rehabilitation and psychosocial support within and across levels of care, as well as in the
community, are necessary to ensure the best results.
Figure 2 provides a map of a typical patient’s pathway. This pathway should be considered
when planning and organizing referral mechanisms, and when coordinating services within
and across levels of care. Patients’ journeys need to be monitored and evaluated in order to
ensure delivery of timely and good quality services.
29
diagnosis and treatment
In organizing cancer diagnostic and treatment services it is also important to take into
account that people around the world are every day making improvements in health as a
direct benefit of innovative approaches using information and communication technologies,
such as telemedicine. Telemedicine provides rapid access to shared and remote medical
expertise and may prove to be a feasible solution for increasing access to specialty cancer
diagnostic and treatment services throughout a country or across countries. For example,
telepathology was employed to achieve teleconsultation between a tertiary cancer referral
centre, Tata Memorial Centre in Mumbai, India, and a rural hospital. The evaluation showed
that it was possible to have good pathology consultation in 99% cases (Desai et al., 2004).
30
Planning step 3
Diagnosis of cancer
Continuing treatment
End of treatment
Long-term survival
Cure
Source: Fitch M (2003). Supportive care: rebalancing efforts. In: Sullivan T et al., eds. Strengthening the quality of cancer services in
Ontario. Ottawa, CHA Press: 141–163.
DIAGNOStic SERVICES
Diagnostic services within a national cancer control plan aim to provide timely clinical and
histopathological confirmation of cancer in all suspected cases. Diagnostic services are
also required for staging of the disease, monitoring treatment and response and follow-up
investigations. Physical examination, imaging procedures, laboratory tests and pathology
reports which include detailed examination of surgical specimen not only allow cancer to be
confirmed but also provide information to determine the stage of the cancer (Longo, 2005;
Sausville, Longo, 2005). Cancer staging helps the doctor plan a person’s treatment and
estimate prognosis (see key definitions, page 4).
Figure 1 illustrates a rational distribution of diagnostic services, where more complex and
costly procedures are concentrated at the tertiary level.
31
diagnosis and treatment
It is the responsibility of the treating physician and the respective diagnostic laboratories to
work in close collaboration to ensure quality of diagnostic and staging procedures, facilitate
prompt referral of patients to treatment or palliative care, as well as to communicate and
discuss about difficult cases. Regarding histopathological evaluation it is important to ensure
that the specimen is adequately obtained, fixed, labeled and transported. As explained above,
telemedicine may play an important role in providing distant and timely consultation within
services or across services.
treatment SERVICES
Treatment services within the context of a national cancer control plan aim to cure the disease
or prolong life considerably, while ensuring a good quality of life.
Cancer treatment is highly specialized and requires the involvement of various disciplines. The
main treatments used alone or in combination are surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
These can be carried out only where there are adequate diagnostic and therapeutic facilities,
staffed by trained medical professionals.
Cancer patients and their families need person-centred care. When cancer strikes, it has more
than a physical impact. Cancer (and its treatment) also has emotional, social, psychological
and spiritual consequences for both the patient and their family members. Whether or not
individuals have timely access to adequate psychosocial support and rehabilitation, when
needed, will greatly influence their quality of life and their ability to cope.
The decision as to which of the targeted cancers are treated at which of the levels of care
will depend on the particular cancer, the stage at diagnosis, the type of treatment required
and the availability of suitable infrastructure, as well as the availability of well-trained and
experienced professionals (see Figure 1).
32
Planning step 3
Surgery for common cancers, such as breast and cervical cancers, should be available at
the secondary and tertiary health care levels. In contrast, surgery for less common and more
complex diseases, such as cancer of the colon, stomach, oesophagus and larynx, should
be done at regional or national reference centres where the appropriate expertise is more
likely to be located.
Cancer surgery is a highly specialized and complex discipline and cancer surgeons need
lengthy training. The surgeon who treats cancer must be familiar with the natural history of
individual cancers and with the principles and potential roles of surgery, radiation therapy,
chemotherapy, immunotherapy and other new treatment modalities.
It is important to recognize that surgical competence alone, without the back up of suitable
infrastructure and a highly-qualified and competent supporting team, does not guarantee
excellent results. In this context, it is interesting to note that anaesthesia-related mortality has
decreased in the past four decades largely because of the development of new techniques
and new anaesthetics, stricter practice standards, better infrastructure, and improved
intra-operative monitoring techniques.
The WHO manual Surgical care at the district hospital, which provides
guidance on the organization and management of district surgical
services, can be accessed via the WHO web site, go to i
[Link] www
Radiotherapy requires costly equipment and facilities, and specialized expertise. Radiotherapy
should, therefore, only be provided by regional or national cancer centres or tertiary level
hospitals where the necessary infrastructure and expertise is concentrated and can be made
available on a sustainable basis.
A radiotherapy unit needs highly specialized professionals and support staff, such as radiation
oncologists, radiation therapy technologists, medical radiation physicists, physical therapists,
psychologists, electronics technicians and maintenance engineers.
33
diagnosis and treatment
A patient requiring radiotherapy may be treated using two broad groups of techniques:
teletherapy and brachytherapy. External beam radiation therapy or teletherapy is usually
administered in a tertiary hospital on an ambulatory basis. The treatment takes place in an
enclosed shielded room (bunker) and no anaesthesia is needed for adult patients. It may be
administered by cobalt machines or by medical linear accelerators. For the majority of patients
with curable cancers or cancers that are treatable but not curable, cobalt machines are the
more cost-effective option in low- and middle-income countries (WHO, 2002; Barton et al.
2006). This is not simply because the capital and maintenance costs of a cobalt machine
are much lower than those for a linear accelerator, but also because a linear accelerator is
easily damaged by an unstable electric supply, a common hazard in low-income countries
(Van der Giessen, 2002).
34
Planning step 3
Chemotherapy is usually very expensive, may have severe side-effects and often requires
patients to undergo a prolonged period of treatment. In low-resource settings, the initial
focus for services should be the treatment of the most common curable cancers for which
there is significant evidence that chemotherapy alone or in combination with other treatment
modalities is effective.
A chemotherapy unit needs highly specialized professionals and support staff, such as
medical oncologists, paediatric oncologists, haematologists, oncology nurses, pharmacists
and psychologists. As most chemotherapy can be given on an outpatient basis, large-scale
inpatient facilities are not required.
More complex chemotherapy should be provided at the tertiary level in oncology departments,
or in regional or national cancer centres, where the best diagnosis and treatment facilities
and expertise are concentrated.
Having established national treatment protocols for the prioritized cancers, the necessary
chemotherapeutic agents and other important medicines should be included in a country’s
list of essential medicines. The essential drugs list and the treatment protocols will guide the
practice of chemotherapy nationwide, in both private and public institutions.
WHO’s model list of essential medicines (WHO, 2007), which includes a range of chemotherapy
drugs on which countries can base their own essential medicine lists, is updated every
2 years.
Access to essential drugs has improved in most low-income countries with the production
of generic versions of proprietary drugs. Generic drugs are frequently as effective as, but
much cheaper than, brand-name drugs and are available locally.
35
diagnosis and treatment
Basic psychosocial care must be integral to the practice of all health-care professionals
dealing with cancer patients. Psychosocial care is demonstrated in actions such as:
p offering patients and their families emotional support and information;
p communicating in a person-centred and sensitive manner;
p referring patients to peer support (such as other cancer patients or cancer survivor
groups) and volunteer-led initiatives that help patients meet their psychosocial needs;
p referring patients requiring additional assistance to psychosocial experts, such as social
workers, psychologists, chaplains, trained nurses and therapists.
Individuals who receive appropriate emotional or psychosocial care during the period of
diagnosis and treatment tend to experience less anxiety and depression, and are more
likely to be able to return to a productive life. Both patients and families report a significant
improvement in quality of life (Blake-Mortimer et al., 1999; Coates, 1997), and better
adherence to therapy has been observed (Fawzy, 1999).
Key elements in a quality control system for a diagnosis and treatment programme are:
p continuous training of health-care providers at the different levels of care;
p monitoring of management processes and results;
p provision of clinical services by competent health professionals, in accordance with
established clinical guidelines;
p maintaining the required quality and safety standards for laboratory and treatment
equipment, infrastructure and materials (including drugs).
In the case of chemotherapy, the quality control system should ensure that drugs are:
p obtained from reliable manufacturers;
p stored, used and discarded according to prescribed conditions;
p periodically analysed for bioactivity in a national laboratory;
p prescribed only by adequately trained physicians.
36
Planning step 3
In the case of radiation therapy, the quality control system should ensure that:
p processes and procedures are designed to confirm that radiotherapy is administered
appropriately and safely, and documented properly;
p a hospital radiation safety committee is established for the prevention of radiation
accidents, as well as to ensure adherence to optimal medical practice and compliance
with the International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation
and for the Safety of Radiation Sources (IAEA,1996).
Useful tools for developing hospital-based cancer registries can be accessed through the
web site of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, go to i
[Link] www
Mention has already been made of the application of a quality improvement framework to the
evaluation of the performance of diagnosis and treatment programmes (see planning step 2).
Table 8 provides examples of structure, process and outcome indicators and their standards,
which can be used to evaluate a diagnosis and treatment programme targeting common curable
cancers. National cancer control programmes: policies and managerial guidelines (WHO,
2002) provides further guidance on monitoring and evaluating cancer control programmes,
including diagnosis and treatment programmes, using both the quality improvement and the
system model frameworks.
No matter which framework is used, the evaluation plan needs to define clearly:
p who will do the evaluation;
p what will be evaluated;
p which core indicators (measures) and standards (values set by stakeholders) will be used;
p how the evaluation will be designed and carried out to ensure credibility;
p how the results of the evaluation will be used to improve programme performance.
37
diagnosis and treatment
OUTCOME
Short-term outcomes
• Proportion of curable cancer cases diagnosed in early stages >70%
38
Conclusion
Conclusion
A plan for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer is a key component of any
overall cancer control plan. Its main goal is to cure cancer patients or prolong
their life considerably, ensuring a good quality of life. In order for a diagnosis
and treatment programme to be effective, it must never be developed in
isolation. It needs to be linked to an early detection programme so that cases
are detected at an early stage, when treatment is more effective and there is
a greater chance of cure. It also needs to be integrated with a palliative care
programme, so that patients with advanced cancers, who can no longer benefit
from treatment, will get adequate relief from their physical, psychosocial and
spiritual suffering. Furthermore, programmes should include a awareness-
raising component, to educate patients, family and community members about
the cancer risk factors and the need for taking preventive measures to avoid
developing cancer.
Where resources are limited, diagnosis and treatment services should initially
target all patients presenting with curable cancers, such as breast, cervical
and oral cancers that can be detected early. They could also include childhood
acute lymphatic leukaemia, which has a high potential for cure although
it cannot be detected early. Above all, services need to be provided in an
equitable and sustainable manner. As and when more resources become
available, the programme can be extended to include other curable cancers
as well as cancers for which treatment can prolong survival considerably.
Cancer Control
Knowledge into Action
WHO Guide for Effective Programmes
references
• Barr R et al. (2002). Pediatric oncology in countries with limited • Jensen OM et al., eds. (1991). Cancer registration: principles
resources. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, eds. Principles and practice and methods. Lyon, International Agency for Research on
of pediatric oncology. Philadelphia, Lippincott, Williams and Cancer Press (IARC Scientific Publication, No. 95).
Wilkins:1541–1552.
• Longo DL (2005). Approach to the patient with cancer. In:
• Barton M et al. (2006). Role of radiotherapy in cancer control Kasper DL et al, eds. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine,
in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Oncology, 16th ed. New York, McGraw Hill Medical Publishing Division:
7:584–595. 435–441.
• Bonilla M, Ribeiro R, Wilimas J (2006). Pediatric oncology in • National Cancer Institute (2003). Common terminology criteria
developing countries. In: Sierrasesumaga L, Antillon F, eds. for adverse events, Version 3.0. Bethesda, MD,United States,
Monograph on pediatric oncology. Madrid, Pearson Prentice Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute
Hall: 881–893. of Health ([Link] accessed
18 October, 2007).
• Blake-Mortimer J et al. (1999). Improving the quality and
quantity of life among patients with cancer: a review of the • Sausville EA, Longo DL (2005). Principles of cancer treatment.
effectiveness of group psychotherapy. European Journal of In: Kasper DL et al, eds. Harrison’s Principles of Internal
Cancer, 35:1581–1586. Medicine, 16th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing
Division: 464-482.
• Coates A (1997). Quality of life and supportive care. Supportive
Care in Cancer, 5:435–438. • Van der Giessen P (2002). Maintenance costs for cobalt
machines and linear accelerators: new machines versus old.
• Desai S, Patil R, Kothari A et al. (2004). Telepathology Radiotherapy and Oncology, 62:349–350.
consultation service between Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai
and Nargis Dutt Memorial Charitable Hospital, Barshi, Solapur, • WHO (2002). National cancer control programmes: policies
Maharashtra: an analysis of the first 100 cases. Indian Journal and managerial guidelines, 2nd ed. Geneva, World Health
of Pathology and Microbiology, 50:749-753 Organization.
• Fawzy FI (1999). Psychosocial interventions for patients with • WH0 (2005). World Alliance for Patient Safety: WHO draft
cancer: what works and what doesn’t. European Journal of guidelines for adverse event reporting and learning systems:
Cancer, 35:1559–1564. from information to action. Geneva, World Health Organization.
• IAEA (1996). International basic safety standards for protection • WHO (2006). Comprehensive cervical cancer: a guide to
against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation essential practice. Geneva, World Health Organization.
sources. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency
(Safety Series, No.115).
40
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
EXTERNAL EXPERT REVIEWERS THE FOLLOWING WHO STAFF Margaret Fitch, International Society of
WHO thanks the following external ALSO REVIEWED DRAFT Nurses in Cancer Care and Sunnybrook
experts for reviewing draft versions of VERSIONS OF THE MODULE Regional Cancer Centre, Canada
the module. Expert reviewers do not Kathleen Foley, Memorial Sloan-Kettering
necessarily endorse the full contents of WHO regional and country offices Cancer Center, USA
the final version. Cherian Varghese, WHO India Country Leslie S. Given, Centres for Disease
Office Control and Prevention, USA
Manzoor Ahmad, College of Pathologists, Nabiha Gueddana, Ministry of Public
Pakistan WHO headquarters Health, Tunisia
A. M. M. Shariful Alam, National Institute Meena Cherian Anton G.J.M. Hanselaar, Dutch Cancer
of Cancer Research and Hospital, Dominique Egger Society, the Netherlands
Bangladesh Suzanne Hill Christoffer Johansen, Danish Institute of
Benjamin Anderson, Breast Health Center, Rania Kawar Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer
University of Washington School of Andreas Reis Society, Denmark
Medicine, USA Cecilia Sepúlveda Ian Magrath, International Network
Luis Fulgencio Baez, Department of for Cancer Treatment and Research,
Haematology-oncology, Children’s Belgium
Hospital La Mascota, Nicaragua WHO CANCER TECHNICAL Anthony Miller, University of Toronto,
Barry D. Bultz, Tom Baker Cancer Centre GROUP Canada
and University of Calgary, Canada The members of the WHO Cancer M. Krishnan Nair, Regional Cancer Centre,
Miriam Campbell, Coordinator National Technical Group and participants in India
Programme on Childhood Cancer, Chile the first and second Cancer Technical Twalib A. Ngoma, Ocean Road Cancer
Luis Casanova, Instituto Nacional de Group Meetings (Geneva 7–9 June and Institute, United Republic of Tanzania
Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Peru Vancouver 27–28 October 2005) provided D. M. Parkin, Clinical Trials Service Unit
Cheryl Cavanagh, Department of Health, valuable technical guidance on the and Epidemiological Studies Unit,
England framework, development, and content England
Eduardo L. Cazap, Latin-American and of the overall publication Cancer control: Julietta Patnick, NHS Cancer Screening
Caribbean Society of Medical Oncology, knowledge into action. Programmes, England
Argentina Paola Pisani, International Agency for
Lea Derio, Cancer Programme, Ministry of Baffour Awuah, Komfo Anokye Teaching Research on Cancer, France
Health, Chile Hospital, Ghana You-Lin Qiao, Cancer Institute, Chinese
Margaret Fitch, International Society of Volker Beck, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft Academy of Medical Sciences and
Nurses in Cancer Care, and Toronto e.V, Germany Peking Union Medical College, China
Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Yasmin Bhurgri, Karachi Cancer Registry Eduardo Rosenblatt, International Atomic
Canada and Aga Khan University Karachi, Energy Agency, Austria
Sue Hawkett, Department of Health, Pakistan Michael Rosenthal, International Atomic
England Vladimir N. Bogatyrev, Russian Oncological Energy Agency, Austria
Neeta Kumar, cancer control consultant, Research Centre, Russian Federation Anne Lise Ryel, Norwegian Cancer Society,
Geneva, Switzerland Heather Bryant, Alberta Cancer Board, Norway
Mike Richards, St Thomas’ Hospital, Division of Population Health and Inés Salas, University of Santiago, Chile
England Information, Canada Hélène Sancho-Garnier, Centre Val
Simon Sutcliffe, British Columbia Cancer Robert Burton, WHO China Country Office, d’Aurelle-Paul Lamarque, France
Agency, Canada China Hai-Rim Shin, National Cancer Center,
Bhadrasain Vikram, National Cancer Eduardo L. Cazap, Latin-American and Republic of Korea
Institute, USA Caribbean Society of Medical Oncology, José Gomes Temporão, Ministry of Health,
Argentina Brazil
Mark Clanton, National Cancer Institute,
USA
41
diagnosis and treatment
42
The World Health Organization estimates that 7.6 million people died of cancer in
2005 and 84 million people will die in the next 10 years if action is not taken.
More than 70% of all cancer deaths occur in low and middle income countries,
where resources available for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer are
limited or nonexistent.
Yet cancer is to a large extent avoidable. Over 40% of all cancers can be prevented.
Some of the most common cancers are curable if detected early and treated. Even with
late cancer, the suffering of patients can be relieved with good palliative care.
Worldwide, millions of cancer patients can be cured or have their lives prolonged considerably if they
have timely access to adequate diagnosis and treatment services.
This module addresses specific aspects of diagnosis and treatment. It is based on the Planning module,
which provides a comprehensive understanding of the overall cancer control planning process and its main
steps. The Diagnosis and treatment module discusses how to develop an effective diagnosis and treatment
programme with a public health approach, within the context of a national cancer control programme.
ISBN 92 4 154740 6