NAME OF THE IES
CAMPUS
TITLE OF THE EXTENSION PROJECT
Name of the student(s) in the group
Name of the advisor professor
Yes
City/state
Summary
1. DIAGNOSIS AND THEORIZATION........................................................................................................3
1.1. Identification the paris indressed and partners.................................................................3
1.2. Problematic and/or identified problems..........................................................................3
1.3. Justified.................................................3
1.4. Objectives/resultstados/efeitto be achieved (in relation to the identified problem and
from the perspective of the involved audiences).......................................................................................3
1.5. Referential ttheoretical (subsidyttheoretical for proposalstactions of the exttension).....................3
2. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT.......................................................4
2.1. Plan oftwork (using toolstthe agreement with the teacherte)........................................4
2.2. Description in the form of wrappingtthe audience participatesand in the formulation of the projeto,
your developmenttor evaluation, as well as the estratI took charge of the group to mobilize them..............4
2.3. Group oftwork (description of the responsibility of each member)..................................4
2.4. Meas, crytcriteria or indicators for project evaluationto.......................................................4
2.5. Resources forecasttos
2.6. Oftpraise betotproject technicianto..........................................................................................5
3. CLOSURE OF THE PROJECT......................................................................................................5
3.1. RelatCollective task (which can be oral and writtentor just writeta).........................................5
3.2. Evaluation of the reaction of the pairtand interessada.............................................................................5
3.3. Relator Individual Experience............................................................................................5
3.1. CONTEXTUALIZATION
3.2. METHODOLOGY
3.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:....................................................................................................6
3.4. IN-DEPTH REFLECTION
3.5. CONSIDERATIONS FINALS........................................................................................................6
[Link] AND THEORIZATION
1.1. Identification of stakeholders and partners
Describe the stakeholders in the project (socioeconomic profile, education level, gender,
age group, estimated number of participants, other information), including citing
partners, if any. At this stage, it is important to demonstrate who the participants are to
justify the social relevance of the project. Include evidence (e.g. agreement term of
cooperation) of the agreement between the interested parties.
1.2. Issues and/or identified problems
Describe the identified problem(s) and the chosen/prioritized one that motivates the
development of the extension project. At this stage, it should be clearly demonstrated the
problem and/or problem-situation that required the development of the extension project.
It was also clarified that the socio-community demand was identified, starting from
meetings/conversations/exchanges/listening to the community where the project will be developed.
1.3. Justification
Describe how the identified issue (1.2 – chosen problem) is pertinent.
academically, since project-based learning consists of production
the application of knowledge aimed at solving real demands. Important
highlight the relationship with the course (training/learning objectives), as well as the
motivations of the work group.
1.4. Objectives/results/effects to be achieved (in relation to the problem
identified and from the perspective of the parties involved
Describe between 1 and 3 objectives, at most, that must be achieved by the team.
develop the extension project. At this stage the objectives must be described with
action verbs, in a clear and concise manner, in the form of topics (when there is more than one)
corresponding to the concrete results that the extension project aims to achieve.
It is worth noting that the results obtained from the project should be demonstrated, therefore,
When the working group defines the objectives, it should think about the way of participation of
Publics in the evaluative process (which instruments to use?).
1.5. Theoretical framework (theoretical support for the proposal of extension actions)
Brief exposition and discussion of the theoretical references used to understand and clarify the
problem situation that guides the project, presenting them and relating them to the
project development. The chosen theoretical framework must be assertive for
justify the choices of actions formulated, that is, works and authors cited must
present appropriate theoretical-scientific responses to the challenges faced during the
execution of the extension project. Here at least 3 (three) authors must be
referenced (see bibliographic references of the subject and others at the discretion of the teacher and
or two academics). It is suggested to have a minimum of 500 characters and a maximum of 3 (three) pages.
2. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT
2.1. Work plan (using the tool agreed upon with the teacher)
Create a work plan containing information about the actions to be executed.
to achieve the project's objectives, containing a schedule with deadlines and responsible parties
for each task, resources and ways to monitor the results. The work plan
it can be formulated digitally, asynchronously or synchronously, or even by use
of physical materials in the classroom, such as: poster boards, whiteboard, murals, etc.
The schedule must specify the delivery deadline for each of the stages.
projects described in item 14 - Teaching-Learning Procedures of the Teaching Plan,
as well as the deadlines for the deliveries of the text for each item of this extension guide.
2.2. Description of the way of involving the participating public in the formulation
of the project, its development and evaluation, as well as the strategies by
group to mobilize them.
Presenting the way in which the sociocommunity participants involved acted in the
planning, development, and evaluation of the project. It is important to highlight that these
stages will be defined based on meetings/conversations/exchanges/listening to the community,
context in which the delineation of the actions of the extension project will also be the product of
interaction between the academic public and the local public in joint construction. Produce
records (e.g.: photos, screenshots, messages, forms, etc.) of meetings, discussions,
interactions to highlight the occurrence of mutual exchange.
Working group (description of the responsibility of each member)
Present the role, the responsibility(ies), and the responsibility activities of each
member of the working group. It is important to emphasize that this delimitation will be the basis for the
evaluation of the individual learning report, to be filled out in item 3.2 of this
document.
2.4. Goals, criteria or evaluation indicators of the project
Describe the detailing of the steps to achieve the objectives set out in section 1.4.
indicating how they will be achieved, defining the necessary criteria and indicators
for the effectiveness of the project.
2.5. Planned resources
Describe the planned resources (material, institutional, and human) for the
project development. Clarify that any indication of financial expenses must
point to the source
of this resource. It is suggested to prioritize strategies that minimize as much as possible the
expenditure of financial costs, considering that the HEIs have no forecast of
specific resources for the execution of extension projects to be developed in
curricular matrix subjects.
2.6. Technical detailing of the project
Describe the Information Technology solution developed, according to the defined steps.
no item 14 - Teaching-Learning Procedures of the Teaching Plan, stage 4.
3. PROJECT CLOSURE
3.1. Collective Report:
Group considerations on the achievement of established socio-community objectives
for the project.
3.1.1. Stakeholder reaction assessment
Conduct reaction assessment with the stakeholder (e.g., questionnaire, recorded interview in
audio/video, audio/video testimony, etc.), to ensure effective achievement of
proposed socio-community objectives become evident.
3.2. Individual Experience Report (specific scoring for the report
individual
In this section, each student must state their name and systematize the learnings constructed.
from your individual perspective. The narrative must necessarily cover the following items:
3.2.1. CONTEXTUALIZATION
Elaborate on the experience/project lived and contextualize your participation in the project.
3.2.2. METHODOLOGY
Describe how the experience was lived: location; subjects/audiences involved;
period; detailing the stages of the experience.
3.2.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
expectation is the lived; description of what was observed in the experience; in what
it resulted in the experience; how did you feel? discoveries/learning,
facilities, difficulties and recommendations if necessary.
3.2.4. DEEP REFLECTION
Space for recounting the experience lived versus the theory presented in the account
collective.
3.2.5. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
Other aspects that can be worked on with the interested party and
perspectives of future work, involving both extension and research.
Alternative technological solutions that could have been implemented for the
developed project.
NOTE: It is required that the entire process of developing the extension project
be documented and recorded through photographic evidence or by videos, having in
given that the set of evidence will not only comprise the proof of execution
the activities, for regulatory purposes, may also be used for exhibition
of the project in academic-scientific exhibitions and extension seminars to be held
by IES.