Non-Institutional

Corrections

COURSE GUIDE
Name of faculty

COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

EDUCATION

NOT FOR REPRODUCTION

 All rights reserved.

No copies temporary or permanent, in whole or in part of this

Instructional Material shall be made without written permission from
the author/s.

ii
 Vision

_____________________________________________________

A vibrant, flourishing academic institution that provides its present and

target programs with exemplary educational experiences, prioritizing
community needs through quality instruction, research, and extension
services.
_____________________________________________________

Mission

_____________________________________________________

To empower communities through academic programs that provide

dynamic and inclusive learning environment, innovative instruction,
impactful research, and relevant extension service grounded in
promoting lifelong learning, ethical values, and social responsibility.
_____________________________________________________

iii
 Course Guide in
Title

NON-INSTITUTIONAL
Page

CORRECTIONS

iv
 Foreword

Community-based correction in the Criminal Justice System has

programs that offer an alternative to a jail terms for convicted offenders.
Not all convicted offenders have to serve their sentence behind bars.
Some are allowed to stay in the community, subject to conditions
imposed by the government. They are either granted probation, parole,
conditional pardon, or recognizance. The community-based correction is
based on the fact that convicted offenders will eventually return to the
community and serve their remaining sentence. They undergo
rehabilitation through different programs given to the term by the
Reception and Diagnostic Center inside and outside of the prison cells for
them to be rehabilitated and will become a lawful person upon re-entry
into the community.
This module is created to educate students about different
rehabilitation programs given to Persons Deprived of Liberty as well as the
laws concerning their welfare. The learning guide covers a variety of
topics, such as the benefits and drawbacks of Non-Institutional or
Community-Based Correction; historical accounts of pardon, amnesty,
parole, and probation; the various forms of executive clemency, including
the procedures for applying for pardon, parole, and probation; Relevant
provisions of the law on Allowance for good conduct and Special time
allowance for PDLs, and; the monitoring and spotting procedures.
At the end of the course, the students will have to apply their
knowledge through multiple choice and essay type activities that will be
given to them regarding corrections. This is also created to attract the
reader’s hearts not to humiliate or discriminate a PDL but rather to accept
and help them start a new journey of their life. Understanding their
feelings will be a great help for them to become a law abiding citizen.

v
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Vision Iii
Mission iii
Title Page iv
Foreword v
Table of Contents vi
Course Overview vii
Module Guide ix
Module Overview xi
Pre-test xii

Midterm

Module 2 Probation 1

Lesson 1 History of Probation 1

Definition of Terms
3
Benefits of probation
Disqualifications
4
Role of Probation Officer
Probation Process 6
Joint Trial 6
References 24
Answer to Pre-test 25
Answer to Post-Test 25

vi
COURSE OVERVIEW
Course Code
Descriptive Title Non-Institutional Corrections
Credit Units 3
School Year/Term 2024-2025
Mode of Delivery Face-to-Face Classes and Module Support with
Blended Learning
Name of
Name of Faculty
Instructor/Professor
This course introduces the fundamental
Course Description concepts and principles on Non-Institutional
Correction. It explores the historical
development, philosophies, and legal
frameworks underpinning community-based
corrections. Students will examine various non
institutional correction programs such as
executive clemencies, probation and parole.
The course delves into the roles and
responsibilities of correctional officers and the
challenges and opportunities associated with
reintegrating offenders into society. It also
highlights the significance of collaboration with
community partners and the application of
evidence-based practices in achieving
successful rehabilitation outcomes.

Course Outcomes Students are expected to:

a. To identify the advantages and
disadvantages of non-institutional
corrections or community-based
based corrections.
b. To Analyze the different types or
programs of community-based
correction
c. To understand the existence of the
Non-Institutional Corrections or
Community-Based Corrections as part
of the methods employed by our
Criminal Justice System under the
Correction Pillar.

vii
MODULE GUIDE

This learning module is specifically designed for Bachelor of

Science in Criminology (BSCRIM) students at Burauen Community
College (BCC). It is divided into two parts, consisting of four
modules that cover various aspects of Community-Based
Correction. The module aims to provide students with a
comprehensive understanding of Non-Institutional Corrections,
focusing on the principles, strategies, and best practices for
managing and rehabilitating offenders outside traditional
correctional facilities.

Part I: MIDTERM MODULES Part II: FINALS MODULES

Module 1: Forms and the Advantages Module 3: Parole

and Disadvantages of Non- Institutional
Corrections Module 4: Executive Clemency

Module 2: Probation

MODULE OVERVIEW SECTION

A brief outline of what the module will cover, including key topics, objectives,
and the overall focus.

PRE-TEST SECTION
Do answer the pre-test honestly before turning to the next pages of this
module.

LESSON SUMMARY
A concise overview of the main points of the lesson.

LESSON OBJECTIVES SECTION

This section shoes what the teacher wants the students to have learned or
achieved by the end of a lesson.

LET’S LOOK BACK SECTION

This section stimulates prior knowledge in preparation for the upcoming
lesson.

viii
MOTIVATION QUESTION
Do answer the pre-test honestly before turning to the next pages of this
module.

LET’S LEARN!
This section presents the lesson at hand.

LET’S TRY THIS!

This involves you doing enabling activities to wrap up learnings.

LET’S DO THIS!
After every lesson, you need to make practical activities as
application to your learnings.

ix
MODULE 2 : PROBATION

Probation

xi
Module Overview

This module provides a comprehensive understanding of probation as a cornerstone

of criminal justice system. It will explore the historical evolution of probation, its
underlying theoretical frameworks, and its practical application as an alternative to
incarceration. We will delve into various stages of the probation process, from
sentencing to supervision and successful completion or revocation.

PRE-TEST

Why is it important for justice system to believe that ‘every sinner

has a future’?

xii
 Module 2 Probation

LESSON 1: Probation

LESSON SUMMARY

Probation is a vital part of the criminal justice system, allowing

convicted individuals to serve their sentence in the community under
supervision instead of in prison. It promotes rehabilitation, helps
manage prison overcrowding and costs, and aims for successful
reintegration of offenders. The process involves a Probation Officer
overseeing compliance with court-set conditions, with the goal of
reducing recidivism and offering offenders a chance while maintaining
public safety.

LESSON OBJECTIVES:

a. Articulate the underlying philosophy and principles of

probation;
b. To analyze the specific legal and behavioral criteria that
disqualify an individual from probation eligibility;
c. To outline the sequential steps an offender undergoes during
the application process for probation.

Motivation Question

Beyond simply avoiding incarceration, why is probation considered a

crucial tool for both rehabilitating offenders and protecting community
safety?

LET’S LEARN!

Nature and concept of Probation

Probation is a term derived from the Latin word “probare” meaning to

“prove” and “probation” which means “testing peiod”. It is a disposition,
under which a defendant, after conviction and sentence, is released subject
to condition imposed by the court and to be supervised by a probation
officer.

13 Chua & Gamez ‖

In 1841, John Augustus attended police court to bail out a “common
drunkard”. The offender was ordered to appear in court 3 weeks later
sentencing. He returned to court as a sober man, accompanied by
Augustus. Because of this, Augustus was recognized as the Father of
Probation in U.S.

In 1887, a law passed in providing for the appointment of a probation

officer for the City of Boston. Edward N. Savage a former Boston chief of
Police was named probation officer and was held as a first probation officer
employed by the government.

In England, Matthew Davenport Hill is also noted to have contributed to

the development of modern probation. Hill has witnessed the sentencing of
youthful offenders to one day terms on the condition that they be returned
to parent or guardian who would closely supervise them. If offenders
demonstrated a promise for rehabilitation, they were placed in the hands
of generous guardians who willingly took charge of them. Hill had police
officers pay periodic visits to theses guardians in an effort to track the
offender’s progress and keep a running account.

In Philippines, probation was introduced with the enactment of Act No.

4221 of the Philippine Legislature on August 7, 1935. This law created a
Probation Office under the Department of Justice. On November 16, 1937,
after barely two years declared the Probation Law unconstitutional because
of some defects in the law’s procedural framework. In 1972, House Bill
No.393 was filed in Congress by Teodulo C. Natividad and Ramon D.
Bagatsing which would establish a probation system in the Philippines.

Following the foundational efforts, the Philippine probation and parole

system underwent significant evolution and refinement through various
legislative acts and administrative issuances.

PD 1990 (Effective January 15,1986). This decree played a pivotal role

in shaping the current system. It amended Batas Pambansa Blg.76,
effectively restoring its original form. A key provision of PD 1990 was the
declaration that probation and appeal are exclusive remedies. This means
that once a convicted applies for probation, they generally waive their right
to appeal their conviction, and vice-versa, for the same offense.

EO 292 Administrative Code of [Link] significant administrative

order brought about a change in the administrative structure. It officially
renamed the “Probation Administration” (which was established under PD

14
 Module 2 Probation

968, the Probation Law of 1976) to the Parole and Probation Administration
(PPA). This renaming signifies the expanded mandate of the agency,
encompassing both probation and parole services under a unified
administration.

BPP Resolution 229. Clearly outlines critical functions of the Parole and
Probation Administration. It specifically authorized the PPA to supervise and
conduct investigations on paroles and pardonees. The resolution also
stipulates specific timelines for these investigations: For Pre-Executive
Clemency Investigation, a 30-day period is allotted for investigation
conducted before a recommendation for executive clemency is made. For
Pre-Parole Investigation, a 30-day investigation is required prior to the
granting of parole, ensuring a thorough assessment of the applicant’s
suitability for release.

Republic Act 10707. This relatively recent legislation indicated ongoing

efforts modernize and improve the probation system. Ra 10707 is referred
to as the “New Probation Law of 2015”, suggesting updates and potentially
significant changes to previous probation statutes, aimed at enhancing its
effectiveness and relevance in contemporary criminal justice

Definition of Terms

Probation- a privilege granted by the State under which a defendant, after

conviction and sentence, is released subject to conditions imposed by Trial
Court and to the supervision of a Probation Officer.

Parole and Probation Administration- Administers the parole and

probation system under P.D. 968, as amended, and exercises general
supervision over all offenders who were released through probation, parole
and pardon. It further promotes the correction and rehabilitation of these
offenders.

Probationer- A person placed in probation.

Probation Officers- One who investigates for the court and supervises a
probationer.

Petitioner- A convicted defendant who files a formal application for

probation.

Probationer- a person who is placed under probation

15 Chua & Gamez ‖
Absconding Probationer- A person who has been granted probation but
failed to report for supervision within the time frame set by the court, or
whose whereabouts are unknown.

Absconding Petitioner- A convicted offender whose application for

probation has been granted by the court but fails to report to the probation
office or whose location is unknown and cannot be traced within a
reasonable amount of time.

Benefits of Probation

1. It protects the society from the excessive cost of detention and from the
high rate of recidivism.
2. It protects the victim by providing restitution and preserving justice.
3. It protects the family. It does not deprive the wife and children of
husband and father; maintains unity of the home.
4. Assist the government by reducing the population of prison and jails;
lessen the clogging of courts, and; enlighten loads of prosecutors.
5. It helps the offender by providing rehabilitation in the community,
restoring his dignity, and; maintaining his earning power.
6. It justifies the philosophy of men that life is sacred; all men deserve a
second chance, and; individual can change.

Requirements on how to avail the benefits of PD. 968, as amended

Criteria for placing an offender on Probation:

In figuring out whether or not an offender can be placed on probation, the

courts shall consider all information of the offender’s character,
antecedents, environment, mental and physical state, and available
institutional and community resources in deciding whether the criminal
should be placed on probation. Probation shall be denied if the court finds
that:

a. The perpetrator requires correctional therapy, which can best be supplied

by his commitment to an institution; or

b. There is an undue risk that the offender will commit another offense
while on probation; or

c. The seriousness of the offense will be diminished by probation.

16
 Module 2 Probation

Who are disqualified offenders for probation?

The benefits of this Decree shall not be extended to those:

1. Disqualified under the provision of Section 9 of PD No. 968, as amended

by R.A. 10707:

a. Sentence to serve a maximum term of imprisonment of more than six

years:

b. Convicted of any Crime against the National Security of the Philippines

or Crimes against Public Order:

c. Who have previously been convicted by final judgment of an offense

punished by imprisonment of more than six (6) months and one (1) day
and/or a fine of more than one thousand pesos (P1,000.00).

d. Who have been once on probation under the provisions of this Decree:

e. Who are already serving sentence at the time the substantive provisions
of this Decree became applicable pursuant to Section 33 hereof.

2. Disqualified under special laws:

a. Offenders found guilty of any election offense in accordance with Section

264 of Batas Pambansa Blg.881 (Omnibus Election Code)

b. Offenders found guilty of violating Republic Act No.6727 (wage

Rationalization Act, as amended)

c. Offenders found guilty of violating Republic Act No.9165 (Comprehensive

Dangerous Act of 2002), except Sections 12,14,17,70).

Mandatory Conditions of Probation

Every probation order issued by the court must contain conditions requiring
that the probationer shall;

1. The probationer should present himself to the probation officer

designated to undertake his supervision as such place as may be specified
in the order within seventy-two (72) hours from receipt of said order.

2. Report to the probation officer at least once a month at such time and
place as specified by said officer.

17 Chua & Gamez ‖

Discretionary or Special Conditions of Probation

The court may also require the probationer to:

1. Cooperate with a program of supervision.

2. Meet his family responsibilities.

3. Devote himself to a specific employment and not to change said

employment without the prior written approval of the probation officer.

4. Undergo medical, psychological or psychiatric examination and

treatment and enter and remain in specified institution, when required for
that purpose.

5. Pursue a prescribed secular study or vocational training

6. Attend or reside in a facility established for instruction, recreation or

residence of persons on probation.

7. Refrain from visiting houses of ill-repute.

8. Abstain from drinking intoxicating beverages to excess.

9. Permit to probation officer or an authorized social worker to visit his

home and place or work.

10. Reside at premises approved by it and not to change his residence

without its prior written approval.

11. Satisfy any other condition related to the rehabilitation of the defendant
and not unduly restrictive of his liberty or incompatible with his freedom of
conscience.

Period of Probation

The period of probation of a defendant sentenced to a term of imprisonment

of not more than one year shall not exceed two years, and in all other
cases, said period shall not exceed six years.

18
 Module 2 Probation

Control and Supervision of Probationer

The probationer and his probation program shall be under the control of
the court that placed him on probation subject to actual supervision and
visitation by a probation officer.

Each time a probationer is permitted to reside in a place under the

jurisdiction of another court, control over him shall be transferred to the
Executive Judge of the Court of First Instance of that place, in such a case,
a copy of the probation order, the investigation report and other pertinent
records shall be furnished said Executive Judge. Subsequently, the
Executive judge to whom jurisdiction over the probationer is transferred
shall have the power of respect to him that was previously possessed by
the court, which granted the probation.

What is the Role of the Probation Officer?

The probation officer plays a major role in the release of the probationer
because he is in the best position to report all information relative to the
conduct and mental condition of the probationer in his environment, and
the existing, institutional and community resources that he may avail when
necessary. The probation officer is in charge of supervising and reforming
the probationer for a set length of time through a personalized,
individualized and community-based rehabilitation program. The court will
decide whether or not the probationer is eligible for release based on his
final report.

The probation officer’s neglect to submit his report and recommendation is

reprehensible. Without the report, the trial court could not issue the order
of the final discharge of the probationer. It is this order of final discharge,
which would restore the probationer’s suspended civil rights. In the
absence of the order of final discharge, the probationer would still subsist,
unless otherwise revoked for cause.

19 Chua & Gamez ‖

Post-sentence Investigation

Post-sentence Investigation Report

20
 Module 2 Probation

Full-Blown Courtesy Investigation (FBCI)

Full-blown courtesy investigation is a comprehensive courtesy
investigation from another probation office, which requests for a complete
PSIR on a petition for probation pending referral investigation in the
probation office of origin. It shall take place when upon initial investigation
it is gathered that:
a. Petitioner for probation is a transient offender in the place of
commission of the crime and/or a permanent resident of another
place;
b. He or she spent his or her pre-adolescent and/or adolescent life
in the province or city of origin;
c. He or she attended and/or finished his education thereat;
d. His or her immediate family member, collateral informants or
disinterested persons and officials who can best authenticate the
inter-family relationship, upbringing, behavior of the petitioner for
probation in the community are residents of the place of his or
her origin.

Partial Courtesy Investigation

Partial courtesy investigation refers to all other courtesy
investigation to be conducted by another probation office not falling
within the scope of an FBCI.

Revocation of Probation Procedure

1. At any time during probation, the court may issue a warrant for the
arrest of a probationer for any serious violation of the conditions of
probation.
2. Once arrested and detained, the probationer shall immediately be
brought before the court for hearing the violation charged.
3. The defendant may be admitted to bail pending such hearing. In such
case, the provisions regarding release on bail of persons charged with
the crime shall be applicable to probationers arrested under this
provision.
4. An order revoking the grant of probation or modifying the terms and
conditions thereof shall not be appealable.

21 Chua & Gamez ‖

Rules where there is Violation of Probation

Violation of Probation is any act or omission on the part of a probationer

which is contrary to the terms and conditions specified in the probation
order. Hence, the Probation Officer may motu proprio (on its own motion
or initiative) or upon the report of a probation aide or any other person,
conducts a fact-finding investigation of any alleged violation of probation.
If the investigation establishes the violation of probation, the Probation
Officer shall report the same to the court.

Content of the Violation Report- The report of the Probation Officer to the
court concerning an alleged violation of probation shall include, among
others:

1. A complete statement of facts of the alleged violation, including the date,

place and circumstances thereof, the statements of witnesses and the
arresting officer, if any:

2. The explanation, if any, of the probationer to the charge; and

3. The recommendation of the Probation Officer.

Termination of Probation

After the period of probation and upon consideration of the report and
recommendation of the probation officer, the court may order the final
discharge of the probationer upon finding that he has fulfilled all the terms
and conditions of his probation and thereupon the case is deemed
terminated. The final discharge of the probationer shall restore his civil
rights which were suspended during the period of probation. At this point,
all civil and criminal liability on the part of the probationer shall be
extinguished.

Causes for Probation Cases to be Terminated or Closed

1. Expiration of the period of probation

2. By revocation for cause under the Probation Law

3. By the death of the probationer

22
 Module 2 Probation

4. By the successful completion of a program of probation

Plea Bargaining

A process by whereby the accused and the prosecution work out mutually
satisfactory disposition of the case subject to court approval. It usually
involves in the defendant’s pleading guilty to a lesser offense or to only one
or some of the counts of a multicount indictment in return for a lighter
sentence than that for the graver charge. Ordinarily, plea bargaining is
made during the pre-trial stage. It is authorized under Section 2, Rule 116
of the Rules of Court.

Is Plea Bargaining allowed in drug cases?

Yes, in the landmark case of Salvador Estipona vs. Judge Lobrigo (En
Banc), G.R. 226679, August 15, 2017, the Supreme Court declared
Sec.23 of R.A 9165 prohibiting plea bargaining in drug cases to be
unconstitutional.

Why is it that under Revised Guidelines for Continuous Trial of

Criminal Cases, plea bargaining in drug cases is not allowed?

The reason is that Sec.23 of R.A 9165 has yet to be declared

unconstitutional that time because Revised Guidelines for Continuous Trial
of Criminal Cases was issued on April 25, 2017 or almost four (4) months
before that decision in Estipona case was rendered.

After the Estipona case, what guidelines were issued on plea bargaining in
drug cases?

1. The Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) issued OCA Circular 90-
18, adopting the Supreme Court En Banc Resolution dated April 10,
2018 or Adoptation of the Plea Bargaining Framework in Drug
Cases.
It sets limits to be observed in plea bargaining in drug cases including
the specific violations subject of plea bargaining.
2. The Department of Justice also issued DOJ Circular No.27 on June 26,
2018 or the Amended Guidelines on Plea Bargaining for RA 9165,

23 Chua & Gamez ‖

 to serve as an internal guideline for the prosecutors to observe before
they give their consent to proposed plea bargains.

PROCESS OF PROBATION

Johan found
guilty &
sentenced 6 yrs
imprisonment

NOTE:

Probation can only be granted, denied, modified, revoked, or

terminated by the judge who heard and resolved the case.

When an accused who appealed may still apply for probation

When a judgement imposing a non-probationable penalty is appealed or

reviewed, regardless of the nature of such appeal, and the judgement is
modified by an appellate court through the imposition of a lesser penalty or
conviction for a lesser crime which is probationable, the accused shall be
allowed to apply for probation based on the modified decision within fifteen
(15) days from the receipt by the accused or counsel of the modified
decision.

24
 Module 2 Probation

The application for probation based on the modified decision shall be filed in
the court of origin or in trial court where such case has been re-raffled. The
petition for Probation must include a Certified True Copy of the Modified
Decision of the Appellate Court. Moreover, the petitioner should inform the
appellate court of its intention to apply for probation. This notwithstanding,
the accused shall lose the right to apply for probation on a modified decision
should he/she seek review of the modified decision which already imposes a
probationable penalty (As amended by RA 10707).

Probation of some accused after Joint Trial and conviction

When two (2) or more accused are tried jointly and convicted, and some
have taken further appeal, the other accused who did not file an appeal may
apply for probation by filing a petition for probation within fifteen (15) days
from the promulgation of judgement or notice thereof and attaching thereto
a certified true copy of the judgement of conviction. The trial court shall act
on the petition for probation even after it shall have forwarded the entire
records of the case to the appellate court and despite the pendency of the
appeal of the other accused.

The filing of probation of one or more several accused shall make the
decision of the trial court final as to them but not to those who have taken
further appeal.

The decision in the appeal shall not affect those who applied for probation
except in so far as the judgement of the appellate court is favorable and
applicable to the latter.

25 Chua & Gamez ‖

 ASSESSMENT

Name: __________________________________ Score: ___________

Degree Program/Year/Section: ____________ Date: ____________

Mystery Quotation

What does this quote means, “Probation is about you changing, if you are
not ready to change, you are ready for prison”?

LET’S TRY THIS!

Answer the following:

1. To what extent does probation effectively balance its dual goals
of rehabilitation and public safety? Discuss the challenges in
achieving this balance.
2. What is your opinion on the rules that disqualify certain
offenders from probation? Do you believe theses qualification
rules are fair and effective, or do they create more problems
than they solve? Explain your view.

LET’S DO THIS!
26
 Module 2 Probation

Each student should recite the entire process of probation.

POST-TEST
Kindly choose the letter of the correct answer.

1. Judicial disposition under which a defendant after conviction

and sentence is released
a. Amnesty
b. Reprieve
c. Pardon
d. Probation
2. Where is an application for probation filed?
a. The trial court that convicted the offender
b. The Department of Justice
c. The Board of Pardons and Parole
d. The Supreme Court
3. When must an application for probation be filed?
a. After the offender has fully served their sentence
b. Anytime after the offender has served half of their sentence
c. Before the arraignment of the accused
d. Within 15days from the promulgation of judgement
4. What happens if a probationer violates the conditions of their
probation?
a. The court may order the arrest of the probationer and cause
them to serve the original sentence
b. The probationer is subjected to a new trial
c. The period of probation is automatically extended
d. The probationer is immediately granted a pardon
5. When will the court deny application for probation of a
petitioner?
a. Petitioner is a foreigner
b. Petitioner is a drug dependent
c. Petitioner violated the condition
d. Petitioner can be treated well in an institution

6. Which of the following branches of the Government has the sole

authority to exercise probation?
a. Constitutional Commission
b. Executive

27 Chua & Gamez ‖

 c. Judiciary
d. Legislative
7. A person placed on probation?
a. Prisoner
b. Parolee
c. Probation aid
d. Probationer
8. It serves as the basis in granting probation to qualified applicants?
a. Post Sentence Investigation Report
b. Pre-sentence Investigation Report
c. Report of the Probation officer
d. All of the above
9. Mr. X is a probationer who has violated his probation conditions.
What shall be done to him?
a. Court order him to re-apply for probation
b. The court lets him continue his probation
c. The court revokes his probation and return to prison
d. The court gives him release order
10. What is referred to as withdrawal of the privilege of probation or
parole resulting in the incarceration of the offender?
a. Revocation
b. Suspension
c. Retaliation
d. Commutation

28
 Module 2 Probation

REFERENCES

Apela, RN, Osal, VB, Lucban, MC. (2019). Comprehensive Correctional

Administration Handbook with Therapeutic Modalities. Wiseman’s
Book Trading, Inc.

Gahar, LD. (2012) Handbook on Non-Institutional Corrections, Rex

Book Store.

Criminal Justice Research. (n.d.). Community corrections in criminal

justice - iresearchnet. Retrieved March 11, 2021, from
[Link]
correction

Tumitit, A. A. et al. (2025). Non-institutional Corrections (New

Curriculum and CLE TOS Compliant). Wiseman’s Books Trading, Inc.

29 Chua & Gamez ‖

 Module 2 Probation

COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE EDUCATION

Author/s:
Date of Creation: February 2021
Date of Revision: July 10, 2025
Number of Revisions: Rev.__4_
Date of Implementation: S.Y.2025-2026

Evaluated: Florens Lacambra Verified: Cheron O. Reyes

Program Head, College of Criminal Justice DEAN, College of Criminal Justice
Education Education

Approved: ODIEIM

7 Chua & Gamez ‖