Aircraft Systems Course Overview TUM
Aircraft Systems Course Overview TUM
Aircraft Systems
Lecture | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Mirko Hornung
General Information
Lecturer
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Mirko Hornung
Head of the Chair of Aircraft Design
Assistant
Illia Peleshok
Tel. 089 289 16754
[Link]@[Link]
Organizational Aspects
Lecture
• 3 credits / 2 SWS
• Lecture notes available online: [Link]
• Lecture Period: 25.04.2025– 25.07.2025
Exam
• Written Exam (60 min)
• Contents of all lectures relevant
• Date of Exam: Not scheduled yet (as of current status)
eLearning Portal
Moodle
• Lecture notes available online: [Link]
• Post questions and comments at the forum
• Current news, dates, and other relevant information are posted there as well
• Moir, I. and Seabridge, A., Design and Development of Aircraft Systems, Professional
Engineering Publishing, 2004
Contents
1 Introduction to Aircraft Systems
History of Aircraft Systems, Aircraft Systems Overview, System Definitions, Classification, Design
Philosophy, Failure Conditions, Examples
Contents
5 Environmental Control Systems
Background, Conditions and Requirements, Heat Loads and Flow, Air Distribution, Environmental Control
System Packs, Cabin Pressurization, Pressure Control, Examples
7 Avionics Systems
Introduction, Avionics Technology, Sensors, Communication and Navigation, Displays, Flight
Management System, Examples
Special Slides
… for extra Information
• Special slides for self study (light-grey background and a blue banner)
• If enough time, the lecturer will present the extra information in the lecture.
Objectives
• Understand…
Direction of
air flow
Wingtip
deflected
upward
Source: [Link]
Source: [Link]
Source: [Link]
Source: [Link]
• Podded engines
Source: [Link]
• ~ 53% composites
Source: [Link]
A310-200
1983
A340-300
1991
B757/767-200
• Electronic Flight 1982 A320-200
Instrument System 1987
(EFIS) flight deck • Sidestick controller
• Fly-by-wire system
• Extended use of composites
and advanced aluminum alloys
• Active controls
Years = Entry into Service (EIS)
Engine
(Main Generators)
More
Electric ?
Engine
No
Hydraulics
Network
No Bleed Fuel Cells
Air
Network
1.0 MW
Enabling technologies such as
B787 power electronics, motors, advanced
materials and thermal management
0.6 MW
A380 Source: Boeing (2007)
6 5 liters per
pax/100km
(2005)
5
2
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Year
Supercritical airfoil,
Electrical signaling of
flight controls
Jet
engines
Conclusions
General
• The introduction of jet engines enabled new speeds, altitudes and ranges
• The progress in technical development led to more and more aircraft systems
Aircraft Systems
• Aircraft systems have undergone many changes with the advent of the electronic age
• Onboard computers control many of the functions that were controlled by pilots and flight
engineers in the past
• New generation aircraft have most of the aircraft systems controlled by electronics and
computers
“A heap” “A system”
“A system is more than the sum of its parts – it is the product of their
interactions” (Ackoff 1999)
System
Sub-system Component
System Thinking is the ability to take a holistic or a total systems view of the development
or analysis of any system.
“Maybe pushing on the wall to the right will give some space..” “Ooops”
Strategy
• View the system in an environment of
certain factors of importance
• Examine a system from the top down
and allow individuals (engineers,
manufacturing, support staff…) to
“Simplifying Systems”
critically examine and develop their own
particular requirements
Aviation System
Stakeholders
Military Operators Politicians
Airline Operators
Regulatory bodies
Airport Operators
Government
Users
Aircraft Manufacturers
Employees
Construction Industry
Trade Unions
Suppliers
Aviation System
Caterers/Retail
General Public
Maintainers
Transport Operators
Terrorists
Leisure Industry
Pressure Groups
Commerce/Finance
Wildlife
Police/Security
Each of the stakeholders will have a different perspective of the design and
development process in the aviation system
Source: Moir and Seabridge, Aircraft Systems (2013)
Aircraft
Operators Passengers
(OEMs)
Airport
Environment
Aircraft
Aircraft Systems
Aircraft
Avionics and
Airframe and Structure Aircraft Systems
Mission Systems
Major structural aspects Enable a continuous Enable the operational aspects
of aircraft: and safe flight: during flight:
• Fuselage • Flight Control System • Navigation
• Wing • Propulsion System • Controls and Displays
• Stabilizer • Fuel System • Communications
• Aerodynamics • Energy and Distribution • Sensors
• Structural integrity Systems • Mission Computing
• … • … • …
Group: Structure
ATA Chapter 50 - 59
Group: Power Plant
Aircraft Systems ATA Chapter 70 - 89
Electrical Air
Flight Controls Landing Gear Fuel Auto Flight Fire Protection
Power Conditioning
ATA 27 ATA 32 ATA 28 ATA 22 ATA 26
ATA 24 ATA 21
Hydraulic Equipment/ Airborne Ice and Rain
Stabilizers Doors Communication
Power Furnishings Auxiliary Power Protection
ATA 55 ATA 52 ATA 23
ATA 29 ATA 25 ATA 49 ATA 30
Indicating/Rec.
Wings Lights Nacelle/Pylons Oxygen
Systems
ATA 57 ATA 33 ATA 54 ATA 35
ATA 31
Navigation
Pneumatic Power Plant
System
ATA 36 ATA 71
ATA 34
Engine Fuel Information
and Control Systems
Note: ATA Chapter Numbering System provides a common ATA 46
ATA 73
referencing system for all civil aircraft. The reference system
is controlled and published by the Air Transport Association Engine
(ATA), based in the US for over 75 years to harmonize Controls
requirements of the air transport system. Organization has ATA 76
recently been renamed Airlines for America (A4A). Link:
[Link]
Ram Air
Air/ Fuel/ Fan/Cabin Air
Oil Oil Bleed Air
Fuel
Hydraulic Power
Electrical Power
Fuel/ Air/
Hyd Engine Oil
Hyd Fuel
Air/
Hyd
Elec
Electrical Power
Air/
Warm
Air Mixing Avionics &
Plenum Cabin
Air Conditioning Unit Cold
Pri Sec
Air/ Air/
Air Air
Source: Moir and Seabridge, Aircraft Systems (2013)
Conclusions
• A typical aircraft is equipped with a set of interacting aircraft systems
• Transport aircraft contain several aircraft systems which can be classified in a number
of ways
• By dividing the aircraft into its systems, each area can be studied separately
• Aircraft systems…
− …are also known as General Systems or Utility Systems
− …are often common to both civil and military aircraft
− …are a mixture of systems with very different characteristics
− …all affect flight safety in some way!
Overview
Aircraft systems play an essential role for reliable and safe operation of an aircraft.
Following major four aspects for aircraft system design philosophy have been established:
• Safety
• Handling Qualities
• Maintenance
• Flexibility
Safety
• Simple fact: Failure will always occur!
• For a given failure condition, the higher the probability of occurrence (i.e. the more likely
that it may occur) the less severe it should be.
Probable
UNACCEPTABLE
Remote
Probability of
Failure Condition
Extremely
Remote
ACCEPTABLE
Extremely
Improbable
Safety
No single failure should be catastrophic:
This means that in any system or subsystem, the failure of any single element, component or
connection during any one flight, regardless of its probability of occurrence, should not have
catastrophic consequences.
Safety
Failure Condition Classification
A logical and acceptable inverse relationship must exist between the Average Probability
per Flight Hour and the severity of failure condition effects.
Failure conditions are classified according to the severity of their effects as follows:
(4) Hazardous Failure Conditions must be no more frequent than extremely remote.
Safety
Failure Condition Classification
Allowable
No probability Extremely Extremely
qualitative Probable Remote
requirement remote improbable
probability
Allowable
quantitative average No probability < 10−3 < 10−5 < 10−7 < 10−9
probability per FH*
Classification of
No safety effect Minor Major Hazardous Catastrophic
failure conditions
* Flight Hour
Safety Analysis
Example: B737 MAX
As Boeing hustled in 2015 to catch up to Airbus and certify its new 737 MAX, Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) managers pushed the agency’s safety engineers to delegate safety assessments to
Boeing itself, and to speedily approve the resulting analysis. But the original safety analysis that Boeing
delivered to the FAA for a new flight control system on the MAX – a report used to certify the plane as safe
to fly - had several crucial flaws:
• Understated the power of the MCAS: When the
planes later entered service, MCAS was capable
of moving the tail more than four times farther
than was stated in the initial safety analysis
document.
• Failed to account for how the system could reset
itself each time a pilot responded, thereby
missing the potential impact of the system
repeatedly pushing the airplane’s nose
downward.
• Assessed a failure of the system as one level How the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation
below “catastrophic.” But even that “hazardous” System (MCAS) works on the B737 MAX
danger level should have precluded activation of
the system based on input from a single sensor –
and yet that’s how it was designed. Source: [Link] (Link)
Safety
Objectives
• Each redundant (backup) system allows a safe continuation of the flight and landing
• Each single system failure leads to a single failure in the appropriate system/sub-system.
• The combination of two failures does not lead to a total loss of the superior system.
Handling Quality
Objectives HYD
GREEN BLUE YELLOW GREEN
3000 3000 PSI 3000
designs
Synoptic Display of the hydraulic
• Clear assignment of a visual system indication of the system (Airbus A330)
represented system for a good understanding of the
current system status
Maintainability
Objectives
• Maintainability and reliability are considered as major Airbus A321 – Jacked up for
landing gear change
design parameters
• Spatial separated maintenance areas of each larger system allows a faster inspection
and simultaneously maintenance, without interfering of maintenance personnel or devices
Maintainability
Criteria for Maintenance Area Arrangement
• Safety
• Accessibility
Maintenance Principles
Flexibility
Objectives
• Space for future instruments, avionics and equipment for the baseline aircraft of an
aircraft family (e.g. the A320 of the Airbus A320 Family)
• The addition of further instruments and equipment is not limited by energy and power
system capacities – a power margin (buffer) of +20% should be provided
• Additional wiring capacities and interfaces are provided in the baseline layout
Digital CATIA Model of the Airbus A350 Airbus A350 electrical systems installation