0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

Income Comparison: Rural vs Urban Nepal

Uploaded by

susandhungana090
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

Income Comparison: Rural vs Urban Nepal

Uploaded by

susandhungana090
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Two random samples of Nepalese people from rural and urban region gives the following d

Sample Size Average monthly income s.d


Rural Area 150 800 50
Urban Area 100 1250 30
Test whether the average income of rural people is significantly less than that of urban peo

Solution:
Given size n1 150
n2 100
Mean X1-bar 800
X2-bar 1250
S.d s1 50
s2 30
S.E 5.06622805119022
Z-cal -88.8234788195688
alpha 0.01
Z-tab 2.32634787404084

Null Hypothesis H0: There is no significant difference between average monthl


Alternative Hypothesis H1: The average monthly income of rural people is less

Decision: since C43|z-cal| = 88.82 >z-tab=2.33, so we reject H0


Conclusion: Hence we conclude that the average monthly income of rural peop

memory capcity of 10 students was tested before and after training, state whe
Roll nio 1 2 3
Before Training 12 14 11
After training 15 16 10

solution
Roll no Before trai After train
1 12 15
2 14 16
3 11 10
4 8 7
5 7 5
6 10 12
7 3 10
8 0 2
9 5 3
10 6 8
n gives the following data of income

than that of urban people At 1% level.

tween average monthly income of rural and urban people.


of rural people is less than urban people (one tailed)

y income of rural people is significantly less than urban people

ter training, state whether the training was effective or not from the following data
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 7 10 3 0 5 6
7 5 12 10 2 3 8

d d^2
3 9 here
2 4 n 10
-1 1 d-bar 1.2
-1 1 Sd 2.780887
-2 4 alpha 0.05
2 4 d.f 9
7 49 s.e 0.92696
2 4 t-tab 1.833113
-2 4 tcal 1.294554
2 4
12 84

H0: The training was not effective


H1:The training was effective (one tailed)

Decision:Since t-cal =1.833> t-tab=1.294 reject Ho


Hence we conclude that the training was efective

You might also like