ECON2174 Mathematics for Economists
Problem Set 4 Solution
1. We consider the limit,
f (x + h) − f (x) (x + h)2 − x2
lim = lim
h→0 h h→0 h
x2 + 2xh + h2 − x2
= lim
h→0 h
= lim 2x + h
h→0
= 2x
Since this limit exists, f (x) = x2 is differentiable and the derivative is equal to 2x.
f (0 + h) − f (0)
2. We consider the limit lim . Suppose the limit exists and converges to L.
h→0 h
Then,
f (h) − f (0)
∀ϵ > 0, ∃δ > 0, |h| < δ =⇒ −L <ϵ
h
If h < 0, then we have
2
− −L <ϵ
h
L−ϵ 1 L+ϵ
=⇒ <− <
2 h 2
Using the argument from Problem Set 3 Question 4, this is impossible. Hence, there is a
contradiction. Hence, the limit does not exist and therefore f is not differentiable at x = 0.
3. Note that
||u + v + w|| = ||(u + v) + w||
Treat u + v as a single vector. By triangle inequality, we have
||(u + v) + w|| ≤ ||(u + v)|| + ||w||
By triangle inequality again, we have
||(u + v)|| + ||w|| ≤ ||u|| + ||v|| + ||w||
Combining, we have
||u + v + w|| ≤ ||u|| + ||v|| + ||w||
v1
v2
4. Suppose v = . ,
..
vn
(a)
p
||−v|| = (−v1 )2 + (−v2 )2 + ... + (−vn )2
p
= (v1 )2 + (v2 )2 + ... + (vn )2
= ||v||
(b)
−v
u−v =
||−v||
−v
=
||v||
= −uv
v1
v2
5. Suppose v = . ,
..
vn
(a)
v1 (−1)v1 −v1
v2 (−1)v2 −v2
(−1) · v = −1 · . = . = . = −v
. .
. . . .
vn (−1)vn −vn
(b)
v1 (λ + µ)v1
v2 (λ + µ)v2
(λ + µ) · v = (λ + µ) · . =
. ..
. .
vn (λ + µ)vn
Using the distributive rule for scalar multiplication,
(λ + µ)v1 λv1 + µv1
(λ + µ)v2 λv2 + µv2
=
.. ..
. .
(λ + µ)vn λvn + µvn
We then separate it into sum of two vectors,
λv1 + µv1 λv1 µv1
λv2 + µv2 λv2 µv2
= .. + .. = λ · v + µ · v
..
. . .
λvn + µvn λvn µvn
2
Hence,
(λ + µ) · v + λ · v + µ · v
6. Note that v · u = ||v||||u|| cos θ, where θ is the angle between two vectors.
v · uv = ||v||||uv || cos θ = ||v|| cos θ
Since uv is the unit vector of v, we have θ = 0. Hence, ||v|| cos θ = ||v|| cos 0 = ||v||.
For any other u ∈ U , we still have
v · u = ||v||||u|| cos θ = ||v|| cos θ
However, we have θ now in [0, π]. Note that −1 ≤ cos θ ≤ 1, Hence,
v · u = ||v|| cos θ ≤ ||v|| = v · uv
7.
2 0 2 2 (2)(2) + (0)(4) + (2)(2)
2 1 0 4 = (2)(2) + (1)(4) + (0)(2)
1 4 0 2 (1)(2) + (4)(4) + (0)(2)
8
= 8
18
a11 a12 ... a1n b11 b12 . . . b1n v1
a21 a22 ... a2n b21 b22 . . . b2n v2
8. Suppose A = . , B = and v = . ,
.. .. .. . .. .. ..
.. .. ..
. . . . . .
am1 am2 . . . amn bm1 bm2 . . . bmn vn
3
(a)
a11 a12 ... a1n b11 b12 ... b1n v1
a21 a22 ... a2n b21 b22 ... b2n v2
(A + B)v = . .. + ..
.. .. .. .. .. ..
.. . . . . . . . .
am1 am2 . . . amn bm1 bm2 . . . bmn vn
a11 + b11 a12 + b12 . . . a1n + b1n v1
a21 + b21 a 22 + b22 . . . a2n + b2n v2
=
.. .. .. .. ..
. . . . .
am1 + bm1 am2 + bm2 . . . amn + bmn vn
(a11 + b11 )v1 + (a12 + b12 )v2 + · · · + (a1n + b1n )vn
(a21 + b21 )v1 + (a22 + b22 )v2 + · · · + (a2n + b2n )vn
=
..
.
(am1 + bm1 )v1 + (am2 + bm2 )v2 + · · · + (amn + bmn )vn
a11 v1 + a12 v2 + · · · + a1n vn b11 v1 + b12 v2 + · · · + b1n vn
a21 v1 + a22 v2 + · · · + a2n vn b21 v1 + b22 v2 + · · · + b2n vn
= +
.. ..
. .
am1 v1 + am2 v2 + · · · + amn vn bm1 v1 + bm2 v2 + · · · + bmn vn
a11 a12 . . . a1n v1 b11 b12 . . . b1n v1
a21 a22 . . . a2n v2 b21 b22 . . . b2n v2
= . .. .. + ..
.. .. .. .. .. ..
.. . . . . . . . . .
am1 am2 . . . amn vn bm1 bm2 . . . bmn vn
= Av + Bv
(b)
a11 a12 ... a1n v1
a21 a22 ... a2n v2
(λ · A)v = λ · .
.. .. .. ..
.. . . . .
am1 am2 . . . amn vn
λa11 λa12 . . . λa1n v1
λa21 λa22 . . . λa2n v2
= .
.. .. .. ..
.. . . . .
λam1 λam2 . . . λamn vn
λa11 v1 + λa12 v2 + · · · + λa1n vn
λa21 v1 + λa22 v2 + · · · + λa2n vn
=
..
.
λam1 v1 + λam2 v2 + · · · + λamn vn
a11 a12 . . . a1n λv1
a21 a22 . . . a2n λv2
= .
. .. . . .. ..
. . . . .
am1 am2 . . . amn λvn
= A(λ · v)