1

The Relationship Between Neighborhood Diversity and Happiness

Name

Course

Professor’s Name

Institution

Date
 2

The Relationship Between Neighborhood Diversity and Happiness

Introduction

Demireva and Zwysen (2022) researched to study the influence of ethnic residential areas

on resident happiness and social connections. According to data from the European Social

Survey, researchers revealed that individuals who live in ethnic areas exhibit decreased

happiness together with lowered trust because they experience discrimination while facing

economic challenges. The study revealed heterogeneous results since minority residents

displayed different reactions when dwelling among members of their shared ethnic group. The

research showed that diverse populations build better social structures, but economic

uncertainties and discrimination create opposite effects that diminish these positive outcomes.

Meyers, Kim, and Kawakami (2024) studied the relationship between Racial diversity measures

and residents' neighborhood preferences and local residence judgments. The different approaches

racial groups use to understand diversity directly impact their decision about where they want to

live. White and Asian participants chose communities of mostly White people or mostly Asian

residents as their ideal neighborhood locations. By contrast, Black participants preferred areas

where most residents were Black. Research results indicate that racial identity affects how people

view neighborhood diversity and attraction.

Augustine and Brantley (2023) researched to understand the differences in happiness

levels between the Black and White populations. Results from the study showed Black

participants, mainly parents, expressed lesser happiness than White participants because of

economic differences together with racial discrimination and parenting-related pressures. The

research illuminates how institutionalized racial disparities alter personal life satisfaction and

enriches our understanding of diversity-happiness relationships. The analysis presented by

Peltzman (2024) based on General Social Survey (GSS) self-reported happiness data

demonstrates that happiness experiences dependencies based on socio-demographic elements,

including racial identification and geography. Based on his research, he discovered that racial

happiness differences have reduced, yet they persist. The study showed white participants

reporting higher happiness scores than black respondents, while marital status and income played

a significant role in their results. The study found that racial diversity levels in residential areas

contribute to happiness differences since social trust and political ideology influence happiness

evaluation among residents.

Carolan (2022) analyzed two communities throughout his research to study subjective

well-being (SWB) in these areas that had different racial compositions. Long-term residents

belonging to racial homogeneous communities reported higher satisfaction levels due to stability,

yet communities changing their population reported rising social tension. The research

demonstrated how people tend to feel more comfortable engaging with others from similar

backgrounds (network homophily), therefore revealing the reason why inhabitants of diverse

areas might show reduced SWB, which is because of their unease about social changes. The

research by De la Prada and Small (2024) investigated racial residential exposure patterns during

routine neighborhood travels. Based on their study, the researchers discovered that people stay

inside their comfort zone regarding race, which restricts contact with racially different groups.

The way people move through their communities creates segregated patterns that may explain

how racial homogeneity impacts happiness levels because such neighborhoods have less

exposure to diverse individuals.

Hypothesis

Null Hypothesis (H₀): There is no significant association between living in a racially

diverse neighborhood (Raclive) and self-reported happiness levels (Happy) in the General Social

Survey (GSS) dataset.

Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): There is a significant association between living in a

racially diverse neighborhood (Raclive) and self-reported happiness levels (Happy) in the GSS

dataset.

Methods

Participants

The research drew data from the General Social Survey (GSS) 2018 database, which

studied individuals who answered both Raclive questions about their racial neighborhood

diversity and Happy questions about their self-reported happiness. Each response of missing

values was removed from the data, leading the final participant total to 5,440. The nationally

representative sample includes adults from various areas in the United States who make up a

diverse selection of participants. Both selected variables were required to maintain data integrity

among the participants who were chosen for the study. The collected sample contains enough

data points to carry out statistical testing which leads to both dependable and applicable

outcomes.

Measures

The General Social Survey (GSS) has become a fundamental social science research

dataset that has been in use for many years. Since 1972, the GSS has operated under the National

Opinion Research Center (NORC) to systematically gather data about American social trends,

making it essential for studying how the society develops. Stratified random sampling is a survey
 5

method that produces a reliable and representative dataset that accurately matches the U.S.

population. The research design enables scientists to study various social problems through

extensive methodological capabilities that analyze racial diversity and subjective personal

wellness.

The GSS data provided the research with two essential variables: Raclive and Happy.

Raclive serves as a nominal variable to identify residents in diverse racial neighborhoods by

providing two response options, Yes (1) and No (2). Neighborhood racial diversity information

can be obtained from this variable, though it does nothing to measure the scale of diversity. The

second variable, Happy, uses ordinal measurement to assess self-reported happiness through

three response categories, which include Very Happy (1), Pretty Happy (2), and Not Too Happy

(3). The measured variable functions as a test for both subjective well-being together with

overall life satisfaction. The outcome reliability and validity measures strengthen the credibility

of GSS results. The survey maintains a systematic data collection process through interviewer

training to reduce response measurement biases. Stability in survey responses across different

waves is possible through test-retest reliability, and survey questions are validated by expert

examination to ensure content validity. Subjective by nature are self-reported feelings of

happiness. The results may be affected by external elements like temporary emotional states,

personal conditions, or broader societal situations that affect participants' views about their well-

being during survey time.

Data Analysis Approach

Preliminary data cleansing operations removed missing values and standardized format

throughout the dataset. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-Square tests operated within the JASP

statistical software for data analysis. The data cleaning process included checking duplicate
 6

responses, handling missing values, and validating the correct coding of categorical variables.

The cleaning process was critical in protecting the dataset from statistical interpretation errors by

preserving data integrity. Researchers used the Mann-Whitney U Test because the ordinal Happy

and binary nominal Raclive variables made this approach appropriate. This nonparametric

statistical approach proved beneficial since the happiness scores rejected normal distribution.

The Chi-Square Test of Independence evaluated if living in areas with racial diversity affects

happiness self-ratings between Raclive and Happy participants. A Chi-Square test was chosen as

an appropriate statistical method since it examines relationships between categorical data that fit

the analysis of neighborhood diversity (nominal) and happiness levels (ordinal). The null

hypothesis (H₀) stated that there is no significant association between living in a racially diverse

neighborhood (Raclive) and self-reported happiness (Happy). The alternative hypothesis (H₁)

proposed that living in a diverse neighborhood significantly affects happiness. The goal was to

determine whether individuals in racially diverse neighborhoods report significantly different

happiness levels than those in racially homogeneous areas.

Results

Report for the Results

Data analysis through a Mann-Whitney U test evaluated the distinction between

happiness measurements between residents living in racially diverse versus racially

homogeneous neighborhoods. Results of the test illustrated a significant difference between

happiness ratings with U = 2.429 × 10⁶ while maintaining a p = 0.002 level, which demonstrates

that people in diverse neighborhoods experience varying happiness compared to those in less

diverse areas. A Chi-Square test of independence evaluated the relationship between Raclive and

Happy status. The χ² test revealed a relationship between neighborhood diversity and happiness
 7

levels with χ² (1, N = 5,440) = 2.08 where p = 0.150. This result indicates no statistically

significant connection between these variables. The study reveals varying happiness reports, but

no clear evidence proves that racial diversity affects how people rate their happiness.

Hypothesis Reflection

The data examined by statistics shows partial support for the tested hypotheses. The

Mann-Whitney U test findings demonstrate a substantial difference exists between the happiness

evaluation scores of residents in racially different neighborhoods and neighborhoods without

racial differences. The results from the Chi-Square test showed no direct relationship between

racial diversity and happiness because the obtained p-value was above the necessary threshold

for statistical significance. The Chi-Square test analysis lets the null hypothesis (H₀) survive,

while the Mann-Whitney U test result causes its rejection. Racial diversity does not explicitly

determine happiness levels because neighborhood residents exhibit different happiness scores

regardless of their racial makeup.

Conclusion on the Relationship Between Variables

Research demonstrates that community diversity affects happiness measurements, but

there is no clear, distinct pattern in this connection. The Mann-Whitney U test reveals differing

happiness distributions between the two groups. However, the Chi-Square test failed to show

statistical significance, thus suggesting other elements such as economic stability, social

cohesion, and discrimination serve as intermediate factors. Spatial diversity takes a positive toll

on people's happiness because it enriches cultures alongside bigger social networks. However, it

creates economic obstacles together with discrimination elements, which lead to difficulties in

social adjustment. The findings correspond to Demireva and Zwysen (2022) and Carolan (2022),
 8

who established that diverse communities promote integration yet generate social stressors that

affect personal well-being negatively.

Discussion.

Comparison to Previous Research

This research supports earlier studies that analyzed the complicated connection between

diversity in local communities and personal happiness levels. Through their study, Demireva and

Zwysen (2022) and Carolan (2022) demonstrate that racially diverse areas promote social

integration, yet they create conditions that produce economic stress that diminishes well-being.

The study indicates through its insignificant Chi-Square values that racial demographics fail to

significantly influence happiness levels, thus confirming earlier research about economic well-

being and social trust being stronger happiness determinants (Demireva & Zwysen, 2022;

Carolan, 2022). A study by Augustine and Brantley (2023) revealed that Black parents expressed

less happiness than White participants even though racial diversity was not identified as a factor.

However, economic inequalities and face discrimination were major contributors to the results.

The research demonstrates that financial stability is more important for well-being than the

makeup of different races. Peltzman (2024) documented that happiness variations between racial

groups show decreasing trends, but income levels and societal elements maintain their influence

more than actual racial diversity. Research findings demonstrate that economic factors and

institutional arrangements strengthen or diminish the happiness effects created by diversity.

References

Augustine, J., & Brantley, M. (2023). Black-white differences in parental happiness. Socius:

Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 9, 23780231231153617.

[Link]

Carolan, M. (2023). Taking communities into the groan zone: Subjective wellbeing in the face of

demographic change, racial diversity, and political difference☆. Rural Sociology, 88(1), 162–192.

[Link]

De La Prada, À. G., & Small, M. L. (2024). How people are exposed to neighborhoods racially

different from their own. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(28),

e2401661121. [Link]

Demireva, N., & Zwysen, W. (2022). Wellbeing in local areas: How trust, happiness, social distance

and experience of discrimination differ in the perceived ethnic enclave. European Societies,

24(1), 83–110. [Link]

Meyers, C., Kim, J., & Kawakami, K. (2024). Diversity perceptions and neighborhood preferences for

visual representations of mixed racial groups. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 24631.

[Link]

Peltzman, S. (2023). The socio-political demography of happiness. SSRN Electronic Journal.

[Link]