On

“rPlan – Shell Project & Exploration to Abandonment”

By

Name of the Student: Sarthak V. Bendre

PRN: 1032211997
Final Year B. Tech. Petroleum Engineering

Vedanti Dhende Mayank Kumar Aryaman Sharan Adit Pawar

1032212585 1032212579 1032212651 1032212177

Nelson Mayom Renu Warbhe Siddhant Fulpagar

1032202122 1032201844 1032212639

Under the Guidance of

Dr. Rajib Kumar Sinharay

Professor (Department of Petroleum Engineering)

Department of Petroleum Engineering

Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, Pune Academic Year 2024 –
25, Semester: VIII

Page | 1
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that Mr. Sarthak V. Bendre has successfully completed the project
entitled “rPlan – Shell Project and Exploration to Abandonment Project” under my
supervision, in the partial fulfilment of the Bachelor of Technology – Petroleum
Engineering of Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, Pune.

Date: 28/4/2025
Place: Pune

Prof. Dr. Siraj Bhatkar Prof. Dr. Rajib Sinharay

Program Director Mentor
Department of Petroleum Engineering Department of Petroleum Engineering

Page | 2
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

PROJECT PARTICIPATION CERTIFICATE

THIS CERTIFICATE IS PRESENTED TO

Mr. Sarthak V. Bendre

STUDENT ROLL NO 1032211997

FOURTH YEAR PETROLEUM ENGINEERING STUDENT OF MIT-

WPU (PUNE CAMPUS) IN THE YEAR 2024-25

In recognition of being a project member under to mentorship of our

company rPlan for their final year capstone project in learning basics of
Project Management in particular related to skills of scheduling using state of
the art software (Primavera P6)

rPlan is pleased to accord a Grade A+ to the candidate for the efforts put in !

Date: 28th April 2025 SIGN & STAMP

Page | 3
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Acknowledgement
It gives me immense pleasure to present a capstone project “rPlan – Shell Project and Exploration to
Abandonment Project”. In presenting this capstone project work, a number of hands helped me directly or
indirectly. Therefore, it becomes my duty to express my gratitude towards them.

I am very much obliged to subject guide Prof. Dr. Rajib Sinharay, in Department of Petroleum
Engineering, for helping and giving proper guidance. Her timely suggestions made it possible to complete
this project for me. All efforts might have gone in vain without her valuable guidance.

I will fail in my duty if I won’t acknowledge a great sense of gratitude to the program director of
Department of Petroleum Engineering Prof. Dr. Siraj Bhatkar and the entire staff members in the
Department of Petroleum Engineering for their cooperation.

I would like to sincerely thank my mentor Mr. Rishi Chadda for their invaluable guidance, constant
support, and encouragement throughout the course of this work. Their expertise and insights have been
instrumental in shaping this report.

Sarthak Bendre
Final Year Petroleum Engineering
PRN : 1032211997

Page | 4
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

No. Title Page

No.
1. Title Page 1

2. Acknowledgement 4

3. Abstract 6

4. Objective 7

5. Introduction 8

6. Literature Review 9

7. Literature from Project Coordinator 11

8. Theory 13

9. Methodology 14

10. Overview of Project 17

11. Exploration to Abandonment Workflow 20

12. Graphs for Shell Project 24

13. Project Creation on P6 (Shell) Project 26

Appendix
14. Graphs for Exploration to Abandonment 34

15. Exploration to Abandonment Appendix 36

16. Exploration to Abandonment Explainantion 44

17. Conclusion 50

18. Scope of the Future Work 52

19. References 53

20. Notes 54

Page | 5
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Abstract

This capstone project delivers an end-to-end simulation of the upstream oil and gas lifecycle—from
exploration to abandonment—executed using Oracle Primavera P6, a globally recognized project
management tool for large-scale industrial and infrastructure projects. With the upstream sector being
inherently capital-intensive and risk-prone, effective lifecycle planning demands a highly structured,
multidisciplinary, and systems-driven approach. This simulation aims to replicate real-world upstream
project workflows by constructing a detailed schedule comprising over 500 logically linked activities,
categorized under a Level 3+ Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), spanning exploration, seismic
acquisition, drilling, field development, construction, production operations, Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR),
and final decommissioning.

To ensure industrial fidelity, the project was benchmarked against Shell’s Peterhead Carbon Capture and
Storage (CCS) Project, an advanced energy initiative known for its robust FEED structure, critical path
logic, and detailed commissioning workflows. Insights derived from Shell’s schedule allowed participants to
model high-risk project components such as offshore integration, CO₂ well design, long-lead equipment
procurement, and contractor interface management.

An integral part of the methodology was professional training delivered by rPlan, a project planning
consultancy, which enabled participants to understand and implement key concepts like Critical Path
Method (CPM), Earned Value Management (EVM), and forward/backward pass analysis. Through Excel-
based simulations and real-time Primavera P6 planning sessions, participants gained hands-on experience in
project controls, scope development, stakeholder alignment, and risk-driven scheduling. Sample schedules,
mock networks, and commissioning templates were utilized to simulate real-world project dynamics.

This project not only serves as an academic exercise but also as a field-ready digital planning model,
showcasing how lifecycle optimization, stakeholder engagement, and digital execution platforms can be
synthesized to reflect the planning environment used in today’s upstream megaprojects. It bridges theory
with execution and simulates the operational discipline demanded by modern energy companies for
delivering technically sound and economically viable oil and gas developments.

Page | 6
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Objective

The objective of this report is to present a detailed and professional analysis of the complete upstream oil
and gas lifecycle, from exploration through to abandonment, using Primavera P6 to simulate and manage
each critical phase of the process. This study also integrates an in-depth review of the Shell Peterhead
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Project to draw insights into real-world application of project
management, environmental considerations, and innovative technologies in large-scale energy projects.

By simulating the full spectrum of upstream operations, the report explores key factors such as exploration,
well development, production techniques, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) strategies, and the eventual
decommissioning and abandonment processes. Additionally, this report highlights the importance of risk
management, cost optimization, and regulatory compliance in ensuring the successful execution of projects
in the highly complex and dynamic petroleum industry.

Furthermore, it emphasizes the role of emerging technologies and environmental considerations, particularly
through the lens of the Shell Peterhead CCS Project, to explore how carbon capture and storage can mitigate
environmental impacts while sustaining long-term project viability. The integration of these aspects
provides a holistic view of modern-day challenges and opportunities in the oil and gas sector, offering
valuable insights for professionals involved in upstream project management, strategic planning, and
decision-making.

Page | 7
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Introduction
The oil and gas industry, particularly in the upstream sector, plays a pivotal role in the global energy
landscape. With an ever-increasing demand for energy, the exploration, extraction, production, and eventual
abandonment of petroleum resources requires a careful and calculated approach to ensure operational
efficiency, safety, and sustainability. The complexities involved in each phase of the upstream lifecycle—
from initial geological surveys and exploration to the final decommissioning and abandonment of
production assets—demand meticulous planning, advanced technological integration, and effective project
management.

This report offers a comprehensive analysis of the upstream oil and gas lifecycle, using Primavera P6 to
simulate and manage key processes from exploration to abandonment. Through this simulation, the report
will explore the critical stages of wellsite planning, reservoir characterization, drilling operations,
production optimization, and the application of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) techniques. Each phase will
be examined in-depth, with a particular focus on managing cost, time, and risk, as well as ensuring
compliance with environmental and regulatory standards. The report aims to provide a strategic framework
for decision-making throughout the project lifecycle, drawing on the principles of sound project
management to highlight the complexities and nuances of upstream operations.

In addition to this, the report integrates a detailed case study of the Shell Peterhead Carbon Capture and
Storage (CCS) Project—one of the most ambitious efforts in the energy industry to reduce carbon emissions
through the capture and storage of CO2. By examining the Shell Peterhead project, this study will shed light
on the innovative technologies and methodologies employed to reduce environmental impact while
maintaining production capacity. The project’s engineering workflows, carbon capture techniques, and long-
term storage solutions will be analyzed in relation to their potential applications within other upstream
projects, emphasizing the growing importance of sustainability in the oil and gas sector.

Furthermore, this report will also address the challenges posed by market volatility, geopolitical influences,
and the evolving landscape of energy regulations, with a special focus on how they affect project planning,
cost estimation, and risk management. As the energy transition accelerates, oil and gas companies are
increasingly expected to integrate low-carbon technologies and more sustainable practices into their
operations. The exploration of CCS technologies within the context of the Shell Peterhead project will serve
as a bridge between traditional upstream petroleum operations and the emerging focus on carbon
management, illustrating how innovative solutions can contribute to more environmentally responsible
energy production.

By combining theoretical knowledge, practical simulations, and industry-leading case studies, this report
aims to offer a comprehensive and forward-thinking perspective on upstream oil and gas projects. It is
designed to equip industry professionals, project managers, and engineers with the tools to understand,
manage, and optimize the complex processes involved in petroleum production. Moreover, it serves as a
resource for addressing the evolving environmental challenges faced by the sector, particularly in the
context of carbon management, sustainability, and the integration of emerging technologies into traditional
oil and gas practices.

Page | 8
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Literature Review

Effective lifecycle planning in the upstream oil and gas sector has evolved into a multi-disciplinary science
that balances geological uncertainty, infrastructure complexity, environmental considerations, and economic
volatility. This literature review explores foundational frameworks, modern digital tools, and best practices
that inform this capstone project’s simulation of the exploration-to-abandonment lifecycle using Primavera
P6, supported by benchmarking from Shell’s Peterhead CCS Project.

The upstream project lifecycle—from exploration through abandonment—is marked by technical

interdependencies and investment-heavy phases. As highlighted by Nasirian and Hajipour (2020), lifecycle
management must move beyond fragmented decision-making into a systems-thinking approach, where
technical and commercial workflows are integrated to minimize inefficiencies and bottlenecks.

BP’s Operating Management System (2017) institutionalizes this philosophy by promoting structured gate
reviews, risk-informed planning, and performance metrics throughout the lifecycle. Their model encourages
synchronization between drilling, surface facilities, and regulatory obligations to ensure alignment between
technical feasibility and economic viability.

The Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) (2018) underlines the role of Integrated Asset Modeling
(IAM) in bridging gaps between subsurface behavior and surface design through unified simulation
platforms. IAM principles are critical in enabling planners to simulate reservoir response, production
forecasts, and infrastructure limitations concurrently, thereby enhancing decision confidence.

While IAM represents the technical brain of project modeling, Primavera P6 operates as the logistical
backbone. Oracle’s Primavera documentation (2020) positions the tool as an industry standard for project
scheduling, resource allocation, cost control, and Earned Value Management (EVM). Its ability to integrate
thousands of tasks, manage critical paths, and forecast delays makes it indispensable for megaproject
execution in oil and gas.

Modern upstream operations increasingly rely on Digital Project Environments (DPEs)—ecosystems

where data from reservoir models, procurement platforms, contractor schedules, and asset monitoring
systems are consolidated for real-time visibility. Studies in project control literature emphasize that DPEs
reduce non-productive time (NPT), improve forecasting accuracy, and enhance contractor accountability.

These environments depend heavily on Work Breakdown Structures (WBS), schedule logic, and interface
management—all of which are core to Primavera P6. According to Mirza & Ehsan (2017), project
performance is directly tied to the clarity and accuracy of its WBS and critical path mapping. This aligns
with field practices where floating resources, long-lead procurement, and regulatory milestones must be
tracked with high precision.

The Peterhead Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) project by Shell (Shell Global, 2015) serves as a rare
and invaluable case study of schedule-based lifecycle management. Although the project was cancelled
post-FEED, its publicly released project schedule provides a full view into high-fidelity planning across:
Page | 9
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25
 FEED milestone structuring
 EPC tender cycles
 Offshore & subsea integration
 Long-lead item planning (e.g., compressors, pipelines, SSSVs)
 CO₂ injection well workovers
 Integrated commissioning timelines

The Peterhead schedule also includes Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), P10–P90 forecasts, commissioning
flow logic, and contractor interface dependencies—making it a comprehensive real-world benchmark for
field development simulations.

A key enabler for this project was the rPlan professional training program, which combined classroom
theory with industry-standard planning templates and simulations. As suggested by Al-Ali et al. (2019),
early exposure to digital project tools like Primavera—combined with applied case studies—enhances
students’ ability to engage with complex project environments and prepares them for Integrated Project
Teams (IPTs) in the field.

This literature foundation validates the structure of this capstone as more than an academic exercise—it is a
close emulation of how oil and gas megaprojects are planned, executed, and controlled in the real world.

Page | 10
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Literature from Project Coordinator

Failing to plan is planning to fail they say.

PLANNING therefore is that important in all walks of life. For life on projects
“planning constitutes” the very central performance tool to ensure project success.
Early in their careers, if the Engineers are introduced to planning techniques, and
“Good Planning Practices” much the same as Good Engineering Practices, they gain
an extremely useful knowledge of making every project a success
On this crucial project, rPlan has ensured staring some real time information into
learning P6 with the participants. Two very important literatures have been shared
with all which are as follows:
1) Oracle Primavera’s original document for practicing P6
2) rPlans internal handbook used for teaching P6 internationally

Each candidate is being awarded a completion certificate from rPlan

towards basic learning achieved on this project.
Primavera P6 is a project management software used for planning, scheduling, and
managing complex projects, particularly in industries like construction, engineering,
and
infrastructure. It offers features like scheduling, resource management, risk analysis,
and progress tracking, allowing for better project control and reporting.
Here's a more detailed look at its specific capabilities:

Key Features and Capabilities:

 Scheduling:
Primavera P6 allows users to create and manage detailed project schedules,
including defining activities, dependencies, and milestones.
 Resource Management:
It enables efficient allocation and management of resources, including labor,
equipment, and materials, ensuring optimal utilization and reducing resource
conflicts.
 Cost Management:

Page | 11
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25
Primavera P6 provides tools for cost tracking, budget management, and
variance analysis, helping organizations stay within budget and identify
potential cost overruns.

 Risk Management:
The software includes features for identifying, assessing, and managing project
risks, allowing for proactive risk mitigation strategies.
 Progress Tracking:
Primavera P6 allows users to track project progress against the plan, identify
potential delays, and take corrective actions.
 Reporting and Analytics:
It offers a variety of reporting and analytics tools, allowing users to visualize
project performance, identify trends, and make data-driven decisions.

Page | 12
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Theory
The upstream oil and gas sector is inherently complex, capital-intensive, and exposed to multifaceted risks
across its lifecycle—from exploration to abandonment. Managing this lifecycle requires an integrated,
systematic approach to project planning, execution, and control. This capstone project is grounded in the
application of real-world methodologies, supported by industry frameworks and digital tools that enable
accurate planning, risk mitigation, and schedule integrity.

Lifecycle optimization is no longer a siloed technical exercise—it is a strategic imperative. Each phase of
the upstream value chain—seismic data acquisition, exploration and appraisal drilling, field development
planning (FDP), construction, production ramp-up, enhanced oil recovery (EOR), and eventual
decommissioning—introduces unique technical, economic, environmental, and regulatory variables. As
emphasized by Nasirian & Hajipour (2020), managing such intricacies demands a systems-thinking
paradigm where workflows, data streams, and decisions are integrated across organizational and functional
boundaries.

BP’s Operating Management System (OMS, 2017) further reinforces this need for integration by
establishing structured processes that align project execution with HSE, technical, and financial governance.
This aligns with the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE, 2018) emphasis on Integrated Asset Modeling
(IAM), wherein subsurface models, surface facility designs, economic projections, and operational forecasts
must converge into a unified decision-making environment.

In translating theory to execution, digital tools become mission-critical. Oracle’s Primavera P6 stands as a
cornerstone in managing megaprojects within oil and gas due to its robustness in handling multi-phase
scheduling, resource optimization, interface logic, and Earned Value Management (EVM). It supports
methodologies such as Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and Critical Path Method (CPM), which are
foundational for maintaining project control over time, scope, and budget. According to Oracle’s
documentation (2020), Primavera’s multi-user, enterprise-wide architecture enables coordination across
contractors, disciplines, and regulatory timelines—a capability that mirrors the collaborative nature of
integrated project teams (IPTs) in upstream field development.

To simulate realistic project dynamics, training was undertaken under the mentorship of rPlan, a
professional planning consultancy specializing in Primavera-based project execution. Over a four-month
training window, theoretical foundations were coupled with hands-on scheduling exercises, culminating in
the creation of functional WBS structures and lifecycle schedules reflective of real-world field development.

A standout feature of the training involved the replication and analysis of the Shell Peterhead CCS Project
Schedule—a globally recognized carbon capture and storage initiative. This not only exposed participants
to the rigorous Front-End Engineering and Design (FEED) processes and critical path methodology applied
by industry giants like Shell, but also enabled benchmarking against actual EPC workflows, regulatory
planning constraints, and offshore asset integration practices. This project, therefore, represents more than a
simulated exercise—it’s a holistic application of upstream project lifecycle theory fused with digital
execution. It integrates academic insights with global industry practices, delivering a near real-world
simulation of how operators, contractors, and regulators interact in complex upstream environments

Page | 13
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

-
Methodology
This capstone project was executed as a full-lifecycle simulation of an upstream oil and gas development
project—from exploration to abandonment—using Primavera P6 as the core planning and scheduling tool.
The methodology mirrors real-world project management workflows used by major energy operators, with
specific reference to Shell’s Peterhead CCS Project schedule, which served as both a benchmark and
structural guide.

The project was designed as a digital twin-like scheduling environment, with all key phases of the upstream
lifecycle captured in detail. The focus was to replicate the workflows, sequencing, dependencies, and risk
mitigation strategies involved in the following stages:

 Exploration & Seismic Acquisition

 Appraisal Drilling
 Field Development Planning (FDP)
 Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC)
 Production & EOR
 Decommissioning & Site Abandonment

These phases were modeled using a hierarchical Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and logically connected
using the Critical Path Method (CPM).

Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

A Level 3+ WBS was created, comprising over 500 activities mapped across 8–10 lifecycle stages. Each
activity was assigned durations, start and finish constraints, resource allocations, and predecessor-successor
logic.

Logic Building & Scheduling

Key logic relationships (FS, SS, FF) were defined for each phase using real-world scheduling practices:

 Long-lead procurement tasks preceded construction packages.

 Drilling operations were linked with well site preparation and rig mobilization.
 Commissioning and production handovers were integrated with pre-startup checklists.

These dependencies ensured the creation of a deterministic network schedule, critical for identifying true
critical paths.

Calendars & Resources

Multiple project calendars were used, inspired by Shell’s Peterhead structure:

 5d × 8h calendar for onshore work

Page | 14
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25
 7d × 24h for continuous offshore work (e.g., HDD, subsea installs)
 Specialized offshore calendars for walk-to-work (W2W) operations

Preliminary resource loading was performed to simulate real-world constraints such as labor peaks, POB
(personnel on board) limits, and vessel scheduling.

To inject industrial realism, the Shell Peterhead CCS Project schedule was dissected and used as a high-
fidelity model for:

 FEED Structuring: Milestones, deep-dive reviews, PMO involvement

 Onshore Scope Detailing: Capture & compression plant, auxiliary boilers, power plant outages
 Offshore Integration: HDD planning, methanol lines, topside modification campaigns
 Well Workovers & Decommissioning: Use of jack-up rigs, recompletions, SSSV planning
 Commissioning Logic: Work Execution Flow Scheme (WFS), startup sequencing, interface
management

Key lessons and durations from Shell's project were used to calibrate activity timelines and logic in
Primavera.

The project incorporated:

 Main Critical Path (driven by site handover, compression plant readiness, commissioning to
RFSU)
 Sub-Critical Paths (Steam turbine procurement, CO₂ compression package delivery, wastewater
treatment install)

These were directly inspired by the Peterhead CCS risk analysis which used a P10-P50-P90 simulation to
estimate realistic delivery ranges.

Schedule buffers were incorporated at:

 Equipment procurement stages

 Offshore installation campaigns
 Environmental permit approvals (mirroring the late submission of Shell’s Carbon Storage Permit)

Under the guidance of rPlan, the Primavera simulation was developed using:

 Real EPC templates

 Logic-driven schedule building
 Hands-on feedback loops for baseline creation, float calculation, and revision modeling

Trainees were tasked with simulating a Level 1–3 rollout, adjusting schedules based on simulated delays,
contractor feedback cycles, and material delivery changes. This emulated how IPTs (Integrated Project
Teams) operate in real-world field development scenarios.

This project was not just about linear timelines—it aimed to reflect the Digital Oilfield mindset:

Page | 15
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25
 Integrated reservoir modeling feeds into FDP scheduling.

 Data-driven EOR decisions aligned with surface facility upgrade timelines.

 Field-wide surveillance logic for production and decommissioning.

Though not directly connected to SCADA or real-time data feeds, the structure was designed to be
compatible with digital twin integrations in future phases.
A significant component of this capstone’s execution methodology stems from structured professional
training, delivered in modular format, to establish a strong foundation in project management and
scheduling. These modules, developed and conducted by project planning experts, progressively built the
participant’s understanding from basic project principles to advanced scheduling techniques used in
Primavera P6.

Page | 16
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Overview of the project

This report presents a detailed simulation and schedule modeling of a full upstream oil and gas field
development project, encompassing the entire lifecycle from exploration to abandonment. Leveraging
Primavera P6, this capstone synthesizes technical, logistical, and economic aspects of upstream workflows
through over 500+ logical tasks, critical path analyses, and contingency plans. Additionally, key lessons
and benchmarks have been derived from Shell’s Peterhead Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) project,
integrating real-world practices in FEED, execution, commissioning, and post-production strategies.

1. Lifecycle Breakdown: Exploration to Abandonment

Each lifecycle phase has been broken into Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) elements, with estimates,
durations, resources, interfaces, and risks identified using Primavera P6.

1.1 Exploration Phase

 Activities: Basin analysis, G&G data collection, seismic acquisition, interpretation, and prospect
evaluation.
 Tools Used: 2D/3D seismic mapping, well log correlation, volumetric estimation (P10, P50, P90
scenarios).
 Output: Identification of drillable prospects.
 Shell Reference: Similar to the early-phase subsurface assessments in Peterhead’s CCS project,
especially around site selection and reservoir suitability.

1.2 Appraisal Phase

 Activities: Exploration drilling, well testing, core and log analysis, pressure-volume-temperature
(PVT) data collection.
 Deliverables: Appraisal report, updated static & dynamic models.
 Shell Reference: Mirrored in Peterhead’s pilot studies and well integrity assessments for CO₂
injection feasibility.

1.3 Development Planning Phase

 Activities: Concept select (platform vs. subsea), detailed FEED, economic modeling (NPV/IRR),
risk assessment.
 Key Inputs: Dynamic simulation, drilling programs, facility design basis.
 Shell Reference: Directly aligned with Peterhead's FEED structure—detailed in sections 2.1 to 2.5
of the Shell schedule with focus on project controls, permits, and inter-discipline alignment.

Page | 17
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

1.4 Drilling & Completion Phase

 Scope: Multi-well program planning, rig mobilization, casing & cementing, completions strategy.
 Primavera Additions: Rig calendar, lead times for BOPs, weather risks, casing logistics.
 Shell Parallel: Peterhead’s requirement of special CO₂-compatible well designs and deepwater jack-
up rig scheduling were also planned with long lead items.

1.5 Production Facilities & Processing

 Scope: CPF (central processing facility), pipelines, gathering stations, separators, heaters, flare
stacks.
 Schedule Logic: Driven by utility availability, civil foundation readiness, module delivery windows.
 Shell Benchmark: The Capture and Compression Plant section in Peterhead used modular
fabrication and sequenced commissioning (Area 1 to 13). Exact parallels in construction
methodology and sequencing were drawn.

1.6 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)

 Technique Simulated: CO₂ injection with optional polymer flood.

 Tool Integration: Real-time data dashboards (Phase 2 concept), production surveillance logic.
 Shell Match: Measurement, Monitoring, and Verification (MMV) strategies in Peterhead’s CO₂
storage facility laid the foundation for EOR integration techniques in this simulation.

1.7 Production Operations

 Tasks: First oil, ramp-up, OPEX tracking, optimization campaigns, downtime modeling.
 Add-Ons: Preventive maintenance schedule, digital twin logic (conceptual).
 Shell Lesson: Commissioning overlap with early operations captured from Peterhead’s “End to
End” milestone integration.

1.8 Decommissioning & Abandonment

 Scope: Plug & abandon (P&A), facility dismantling, site remediation, government compliance.

 Special Additions: Risk of wellbore leakage, surface restoration contracts, abandonment CAPEX.
 Shell Mapping: Detailed in Section 3.6.2 and 3.6.3 — with rig skidding, well abandonment
logistics, and CO₂-safe SSSVs modeled with realistic durations.

2. Key Features & Innovations

Page | 18
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25
 Primavera P6 Level-3+ WBS: Over 500+ line items, critical path analysis, resource allocation.
 Dynamic Commissioning Flow: Inspired by Shell’s WFS (Work Execution Flow Scheme).
 Critical/Sub-Critical Paths Modeled: Similar to Shell’s deterministic and probabilistic timeline
(P10, P50, P90).
 Risk-Weighted Items: Inspired by Shell’s Schedule Risk Analysis (e.g. long lead items, vessel
delays, regulatory hurdles).

3. Key Features & Innovations

Shell Segment Integrated Feature

Included Deep Dive reviews, project governance

FEED Phase
milestones, schedule slippages

Adopted CDM regulations, brownfield risk

Power Plant Modifications
planning

Area-wise buildout sequencing (Area 01 to 14),

Compression Facility
peak manpower logic

HDD pilot drill plan modeled, weather

Offshore Pipeline
contingency built-in

Jack-up rig planning, CO₂ well design logic, long

CO₂ Storage Facility
lead item procurement

Critical Path Analysis Fully mapped start-to-RFSU-to-injection path

Page | 19
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Exploration to Abandonment WorkFlow

Page | 20
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

1. Project Planning and Initial Research

• Objective Setting: Define clear objectives for the Shell dummy project and Exploration to
Abandonment project. For example, for the Shell dummy project, the objective could be
simulating a real-world exploration, production, and abandonment process.
• Literature Review: Conduct research on relevant case studies, Shell's historical practices, and
industry-standard methodologies related to exploration and abandonment.
• Data Collection: Gather geological, geophysical, and reservoir data for simulation (e.g.,
seismic data, well logs, historical production data).
2. Exploration Phase
• Site Selection: Identify an exploration region based on geological and geophysical data (e.g.,
formation evaluation, seismic imaging).
• Geophysical Survey: Simulate or analyze geophysical surveys (e.g., seismic exploration,
remote sensing).
• Exploration Drilling: Design exploratory wells, including planning the well trajectory and
equipment needed for drilling.
Experimental Workflow for Drilling:
1. Select drill site based on geological targets.

Page | 21
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25
2. Choose appropriate drilling equipment (rigs, drill bits, etc.).
3. Monitor drilling parameters (rate of penetration, mud weight, etc.).
4. Perform mud logging, well logging, and other real-time monitoring.

3. Development Phase
• Reservoir Evaluation: Evaluate the formation's ability to produce hydrocarbons (e.g., reservoir
simulation, rock mechanics testing).
• Well Planning and Design: For producing wells, plan completion strategies (e.g., casing
design, perforation methods, and production techniques like fracking or acidizing).

Experimental Workflow for Reservoir Simulation:

1. Build a geological model from seismic and well data.
2. Perform reservoir simulation (e.g., fluid dynamics, pressure-temperature profiles).
3. Design artificial lift systems if necessary (e.g., ESP, gas lift).
• Production Testing: Run production tests to monitor flow rates, pressure drawdown, and
production profiles.

4. Production Phase
• Production Monitoring: Monitor well performance, production rates, and reservoir pressure.
• Production Enhancement: Apply techniques to enhance production (e.g., hydraulic fracturing,
gas lift, or waterflooding).
• Data Analysis and Modeling: Use simulation tools (like rPlan) to model production forecasts
and optimize well placement and production strategies.

5. Abandonment Planning
• End-of-life Well Assessment: Assess the remaining reserves and production potential.
• Well Integrity Testing: Check for issues like casing damage, corrosion, or leaks in wellbore
integrity.
• Decommissioning: Plan the process for well abandonment, considering safety, environmental
impacts, and regulatory requirements.
Experimental Workflow for Abandonment:
1. Verify the need for abandonment (e.g., reservoir depletion, economic factors).
2. Plan the abandonment procedure (e.g., plugging and abandoning, removing infrastructure).
3. Execute abandonment operations, including sealing wells and decommissioning equipment.

Page | 22
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25
4. Monitor for post-abandonment issues (e.g., potential leakage).

6. Environmental and Safety Considerations

• Impact Assessment: Perform environmental impact assessments throughout the project phases.
• Safety Protocols: Develop safety protocols for all phases of exploration, production, and
abandonment.
• Risk Analysis: Use techniques like Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to assess and
mitigate risks.

7. Data Reporting and Analysis

• Final Report Writing: Consolidate findings, analysis, and data from each phase into a detailed
report. Include key learnings and recommendations for real-world application.
• Project Documentation: Document the workflow, assumptions made, and decision-making
process for each stage of the project.
• Review and Feedback: Collect feedback from peers or mentors, particularly in real-world
applications of exploration and abandonment.

8. Tool Integration (rPlan)

• Use rPlan to create detailed workflows, timelines, and task dependencies.

• Leverage rPlan for tracking project progress, managing resource allocation, and conducting
risk analysis in real-time during the different phases of the project.

Page | 23
PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Graphs for Shell Project:

Fig.1 Total % of Activities

Page | 24
PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Fig 3. Timeline

Fig.4 Average Workers on Site

Page | 25
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Project Creation on P6 (Shell project) Appendix:

Upon completion of the basic P6 training a carbon copy of the Shell FEED project
was prepared by each participant on the project. Copy of the project prepared by me
Sarthak V. Bendre Student Roll No 1032211997 is as attached in the Dummy project
attachment with this report.

Page | 26
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

 Develop project management team start-up deliverables – Establish foundational PM tools and roles.
 Develop project services start-up deliverables – Set up project control systems and cost reporting.
 Develop HSEQ start-up deliverables – Create safety, health, environmental and quality plans.
 Project management resources – Allocate necessary personnel and tools for overall coordination.

Page | 27
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

ENGINEERING

 Detailed design develop – Complete technical and construction designs across disciplines.
 Engineering resources – Assign personnel to execute all engineering tasks.
 Develop master document register (MDR) – Create a structured register to track all technical
documents.

Page | 28
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

PIPELINE ENGINEERING & INSTALLATION

 Landfall to offshore survey and HDD design – Perform nearshore/offshore survey and directional
drilling design.
 Optimized routing – Select pipeline route minimizing environmental impact.
 Bathymetry and material selection – Finalize seabed profile and suitable pipeline materials.
 Pipeline installation – Lay and secure pipeline across project areas.
 Detailed drawings and installation design – Produce drawings and execution strategy.
 Pressure containment and connector design – Ensure pipeline integrity under operating conditions.
 Fittings, heads, coatings and corrosion protection – Finalize mechanical interfaces and long-term
protection systems.
 Pipeline/cable crossings – Design interface points with other utilities or pipelines.

Page | 29
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

STORAGE FACILITY – GOLDENEYE TOPSIDES MODIFICATIONS

 ESD, F&G, DCS modifications – Install and test emergency, fire, and control systems.
 Methanol system upgrades – Integrate and calibrate methanol injection controls.

SUBSURFACE & MONITORING

 Subsurface CO2 monitoring equipment – Design and fabricate monitoring tools for reservoir
tracking.

Page | 30
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

WELLS

 Award, manufacture and deliver SSSVs – Procure and install surface safety valves.

Well workovers – Re-enter and upgrade existing wells for CO2 injection service.

Page | 31
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

CAPTURE & COMPRESSION

 Detailed design – Complete engineering of capture and compression systems.

 Procurement – Source major equipment and components.
 Enabling works – Prepare site infrastructure before construction.
 Site preparation – Clear and develop site areas including rock fracturing and grading.
 Area construction – Execute civil and structural work on core process areas.
 Underground services – Install foundational utilities such as drainage and cabling.
 Module/equipment setting – Position major mechanical modules and connect services.

POWER PLANT INTERFACE

 Steam turbine delivery – Transport and stage turbine units on-site.

 Steam turbine modifications and installation – Upgrade and install turbines to integrate with CCS
plant.
 Pre-commissioning and commissioning – Validate systems before handover.

Page | 32
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

OFFSHORE: GOLDENEYE PLATFORM

 Detailed design – Complete structural and system engineering for offshore integration.
 Procurement/fabrication – Source and build platform components.
 Offshore deconstruct and construct – Remove outdated systems and install new injection facilities.

PIPELINE SYSTEM COMPLETION

 HDD installation – Execute horizontal directional drilling for shore crossing.

 Pipeline procurement and fabrication – Order and prepare materials for installation.
 Pipeline installation and tie-in – Lay pipeline and connect to offshore/onshore systems.
 Pre-commissioning – Pressure test and prepare line for operation.
 Pigging and final commissioning – Perform cleaning and readiness operations.

COMMISSIONING AND INTEGRATION

 Integrated commissioning – Coordinate multi-system startup across capture, wells, and offshore
facilities.
 MMV (Monitoring, Measurement, Verification) system commissioning – Validate CO2 monitoring
technology.
 First injection – Begin CO2 injection into the reservoir.
 Declare clean energy – Officially mark the start of operations as carbon capture compliant
Page | 33
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Graphs For Exploration to Abandonment:

Page | 34
Fig.2 Phase – Wise Resource Allocation and Risk Levels

Fig.3 Duration and Cost

Page | 35
Exploration to Abandonment Project Appendix:

Page | 36
PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Page | 37
PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Page | 38
PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Page | 39
PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Page | 40
PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Page | 41
PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Page | 42
PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Page | 43
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

EXPLORATION TO ABANDONMENT – EXPLANATION

REGULATORY & PERMITTING

 License to Operate Acquisition – Securing legal permission to carry out project operations.
 Submit Application to Authorities – Sending formal documentation to regulatory bodies for
approvals.
 Prepare License Application – Compiling technical and compliance documents for submission.
 Respond to Authority Inquiries – Clarifying or supplementing information as requested by
authorities.
 Secure Approval – Receiving official confirmation of license to operate.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)

 Conduct Baseline Environmental Study – Collecting initial environmental data for project area.
 Risk Assessment – Evaluating potential hazards the project may pose to the environment.
 Draft EIA Report – Creating a document outlining environmental risks and mitigation strategies.
 Public Disclosure – Sharing the EIA findings with the public for transparency.
 EIA Approval – Receiving regulatory clearance based on environmental evaluation.

PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS

 Identify Impacted Communities – Locating local groups potentially affected by project activities.
 Schedule Public Meetings – Organizing forums to inform and engage stakeholders.
 Address Concerns and Feedback – Responding to questions, fears, and suggestions from the public.

HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS APPROVALS

 HAZID Workshop – Identifying hazards through structured brainstorming sessions.

 HAZOP Workshop – Systematically reviewing design/processes for operational safety.
 Safety Case Submission – Documenting risk control measures for regulatory review.
 Obtain Hazardous Activity Approval – Getting clearance for high-risk operational activities.

SEISMIC SURVEY PERMITS & EXECUTION

 Prepare Seismic Acquisition Plan – Planning scope, timeline, and equipment for seismic study.
 Apply for Survey Permits – Requesting permission to conduct seismic exploration.
 Secure Seismic Survey Approvals – Receiving go-ahead to perform seismic data collection.

WELL DRILLING PERMITS

 Submit Drilling Program for Approval – Providing detailed drilling plans to regulators.
 Respond to Queries – Clarifying technical aspects of the drilling proposal.
 Permit Issuance – Receiving formal permission to begin drilling operations.

Page | 44
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

 Engineering Drawings Submission – Sending detailed structural blueprints for review.

 Safety Compliance Certification – Verifying that plans meet safety standards.
 Construction Permit Approval – Obtaining permission to start on-site construction.

DECOMMISSIONING REGULATORY APPROVALS (PRELIMINARY)

 Draft Decommissioning Plan – Outlining steps to safely shut down and dismantle project.
 Submit to Regulators for Review – Sending the decommissioning plan for approval.
 Obtain Preliminary Approval – Receiving initial green light to prepare for abandonment phase.

EXPLORATION PHASE

 Geological & Geophysical Studies – Analyzing subsurface characteristics for resource potential.
 Volumetric Estimation (P10/P50/P90) – Estimating quantities of recoverable hydrocarbons.
 Basin Analysis – Studying sedimentary basin to understand hydrocarbon system.
 Tectonic Setting Interpretation – Assessing faulting and structural features.
 Petroleum System Modeling – Simulating fluid migration and accumulation conditions.
 Source Rock Assessment – Evaluating organic richness and maturity of source rocks.
 Prospect Generation – Identifying promising drillable locations.

SEISMIC SURVEY EXECUTION

 Survey Design Finalization – Completing technical plan for seismic data acquisition.
 Contractor Selection – Choosing service provider for survey execution.
 Crew Mobilization – Deploying field team and equipment to site.
 Acquisition Campaign – Conducting seismic data collection in field.
 Data Quality Control (QC) – Monitoring real-time data integrity.
 Demobilization – Withdrawing crew and equipment after survey.

SEISMIC DATA PROCESSING

 Raw Data Pre-Processing – Initial cleaning and formatting of seismic input.

 Noise Removal – Eliminating unwanted signals for clarity.
 Velocity Model Building – Generating velocity profiles for accurate imaging.
 Time Migration – Adjusting seismic signals to correct time-depth relationships.
 Depth Conversion – Translating time data into true geological depths.
 Seismic Interpretation – Analyzing processed data to identify subsurface structures.

PROSPECT EVALUATION & DRILLING PLANS

 Prospect Identification – Shortlisting high-potential drillable targets.

 Volumetric Estimation Update – Revising volume estimates based on new data.
 Prepare Prospect Maturity Report – Reporting on readiness for drilling decision.
 Mapping Leads and Prospects – Visualizing possible hydrocarbon traps.
 Risk Analysis – Assessing technical and commercial uncertainty.
Page | 45
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

EXPLORATION WELL PLANNING

 Risk Register Update – Revising list of identified risks and mitigation plans.
 Submit Drilling Program – Filing official documentation of well plan.
 Select Optimal Drilling Location – Finalizing exact spot for well.
 Prepare Well Design (Casing, Mud) – Engineering detailed specs for drilling.
 Mobilization & Rig Up – Preparing and assembling rig at location.
 Wellsite Preparation – Clearing and constructing access to drill site.

DRILLING OPERATIONS AND COMPLETIONS

 Rig Selection and Contract – Selecting and contracting a suitable drilling rig for the well.
 Pre-Spud Meeting – Conducting a coordination meeting prior to drilling commencement.
 Drilling Operations – Executing the complete drilling process for the well.
 Spudding – Initiating the drilling process by penetrating the surface layer.
 Wireline Logging – Recording subsurface geological properties using downhole tools.
 Surface Hole Drilling – Drilling the initial section of the well and installing surface casing.
 Intermediate Section Drilling – Drilling between surface and reservoir zones with appropriate
casing.
 Reservoir Penetration – Reaching and drilling into the targeted hydrocarbon-bearing formation.
 Side Track (if needed) – Drilling a new well path due to obstruction or well control issues.

WELL TESTING AND EVALUATION

 Drill Stem Test (DST) Preparation – Preparing equipment and procedures for formation testing.
 Execute DST – Testing reservoir pressure and flow capacity during drilling operations.
 Pressure Buildup Testing – Measuring reservoir behavior after flow is halted.
 Fluid Sampling – Collecting formation fluids for laboratory compositional analysis.

COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT

 Reserves Certification – Certifying the quantity of hydrocarbons in place and recoverable volumes.
 Economic Viability Assessment – Assessing financial feasibility of the development.
 Final Commerciality Declaration – Officially declaring the field as commercially viable.

APPRAISAL PHASE

 Appraisal Program Planning – Designing a program to assess field continuity and reservoir quality.
 Risk Reduction Studies – Conducting studies to reduce technical and economic uncertainties.
 Detailed Budget Approval – Securing capital expenditure approval for appraisal activities.
 Appraisal Well Location Selection – Identifying optimal sites for appraisal drilling.
 Reprocessing of Seismic (if needed) – Enhancing prior seismic data to support appraisal.
 Additional Seismic Acquisition (Optional) – Collecting new seismic data to refine subsurface
imaging.
 Acquisition Design Update – Revising seismic acquisition plan based on updated objectives.
 Fast-Track Processing – Rapid processing of seismic data to support timely decisions.
 Interpretation for Appraisal – Analyzing updated seismic data for target identification.
Page | 46
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

APPRAISAL WELL TESTING AND ANALYSIS

 Rig Mobilization – Transporting the drilling rig to the appraisal wellsite.

 Surface Hole Section – Drilling and casing the upper section of the appraisal well.
 Reservoir Target Penetration – Drilling into and evaluating the reservoir section.
 Formation Testing – Testing reservoir properties and productivity at the appraisal site.
 Well Testing and Core Analysis – Conducting production tests and laboratory core evaluations.
 Rock Mechanics Testing – Analyzing mechanical properties of formation rocks.
 Fluid Characterization – Identifying and analyzing fluid types and properties.
 Core Acquisition – Retrieving subsurface cores for detailed laboratory analysis.
 PVT Analysis – Conducting Pressure-Volume-Temperature analysis of reservoir fluids.

RESERVOIR AND FIELD DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

 Reservoir Studies Update – Incorporating new data into existing reservoir models.
 Static Modelling Update – Updating static geological models with new inputs.
 Dynamic Simulation – Running reservoir performance simulations under different scenarios.
 Development Concept Selection – Finalizing the development approach for the field.
 Pre-FEED Studies – Conducting pre-front-end engineering design evaluations.

PRODUCTION PHASE

 Production Operations – Initiating and managing day-to-day hydrocarbon production from the well.
 Routine Production Monitoring – Tracking well output and field behavior on a regular basis.
 Gather Production Data (Daily) – Collecting and recording daily measurements of production.
 Analyze Flow Rates and Pressures – Evaluating operational data to assess well performance.
 Identify Deviations and Alarms – Spotting anomalies and initiating corrective action.
 Issue Daily Production Reports – Creating reports summarizing daily production metrics.
 Perform Weekly Trend Analysis – Analyzing trends to identify operational inefficiencies.
 Update Reservoir Performance Tracking – Continuously updating models with real-time data.
 Coordinate with Subsurface Teams – Ensuring alignment with geoscience and reservoir teams.

ARTIFICIAL LIFT OPERATIONS

 Monitor ESP Motor Performance – Tracking electrical submersible pump activity and efficiency.
 Monitor Gas Lift System Pressures – Observing gas injection parameters for gas lift systems.
 Optimize Gas Lift Injection Rates – Adjusting gas input for optimal fluid lifting.
 Diagnose ESP Failures – Investigating causes of pump underperformance or shutdown.
 Repair or Replace Failed ESPs – Performing maintenance or replacement on non-functional pumps.
 Evaluate Lift Performance Monthly – Reviewing artificial lift efficiency and recommending
improvements.

Page | 47
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

PRODUCED WATER MANAGEMENT

 Monitor Water Production Volumes – Measuring and recording the amount of water produced.
 Operate Produced Water Treatment Units – Managing equipment that separates and treats water.
 Maintain Injection Pumps – Ensuring functionality of pumps used for water reinjection.
 Perform Water Quality Testing – Testing processed water to ensure regulatory compliance.
 Report Water Disposal Compliance – Documenting and reporting adherence to disposal regulations.
 Troubleshoot Water Injection Failures – Diagnosing and resolving issues in water reinjection.

FLOW ASSURANCE AND PIPELINE MONITORING

 Monitor Flowline Pressures – Tracking pressure in pipelines to ensure stable flow.

 Perform Scheduled Pigging Operations – Cleaning pipelines to prevent blockage and buildup.
 Monitor Hydrate Conditions – Observing formation of gas hydrates that could block flow.
 Perform Insulation Inspection – Verifying effectiveness of thermal protection systems.
 Conduct Emergency Flowline Flushing – Flushing pipelines in emergencies to restore flow.

SUBSEA AND WELL SURVEILLANCE

 Develop ROV Inspection Plan – Creating a plan for remotely operated vehicle (ROV) surveys.
 Execute ROV Visual Surveys – Conducting subsea inspections using ROVs.
 Identify Damage or Fouling – Detecting wear, corrosion, or debris in subsea components.
 Execute Minor Repairs – Performing small-scale fixes based on inspection findings.
 Issue Inspection Reports – Documenting inspection outcomes and actions taken.
 Submit Inspection Data to Integrity Team – Sharing findings with the asset integrity team.
 Conduct Bottomhole Pressure Surveys – Measuring downhole pressures for reservoir analysis.
 Conduct Production Logging Tool (PLT) Runs – Measuring flow contributions across reservoir
zones.
 Analyze PLT Results – Interpreting logging data to assess individual zone performance.
 Perform Well Performance Forecasting – Predicting future productivity based on current data.

WELL INTERVENTION AND STIMULATION

 Plan Well Stimulation (if needed) – Preparing acidizing or fracturing jobs to boost flow.
 Identify Candidate Wells – Selecting wells that require intervention based on performance.
 Plan Workover Activities – Scheduling significant repair or modification operations.
 Mobilize Workover Equipment – Bringing specialized equipment to the site.
 Execute Well Workover Scope – Conducting mechanical or completion modifications.
 Post-Workover Testing – Evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention.

ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY (EOR)

 Design EOR Screening Study – Initiating evaluation of reservoir suitability for EOR methods.
 Select EOR Technique (Thermal/Chemical/Gas) – Choosing the most appropriate recovery method
based on screening.

Page | 48
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

 Simulate EOR Scenarios – Running reservoir simulations to test the impact of selected EOR
techniques.

 Assess Facilities Impact – Reviewing how EOR methods affect surface facilities and infrastructure.
 Design EOR Pilot Test – Engineering a small-scale field test to validate selected method.
 Execute EOR Pilot – Implementing pilot injection and monitoring its effectiveness.
 Monitor Pilot Performance – Evaluating pilot results through pressure and production analysis

 Scale-up Planning – Developing a full-field implementation plan based on successful pilot data.
 Procure EOR Chemicals or Gases – Acquiring injection materials such as polymers, surfactants, or
CO₂.
 Modify Injection Facilities – Adapting or constructing facilities for full-scale EOR operation.
 Implement Full-Field EOR – Executing enhanced recovery across the field.
 Track Incremental Recovery – Monitoring production improvements attributable to EOR.
 Update Reservoir Models – Incorporating EOR performance data into dynamic models.

ABANDONMENT PHASE

 Initiate Abandonment Planning – Starting the process of decommissioning the field.

 Conduct Well Integrity Review – Verifying structural integrity of wells prior to plugging.
 Develop Plug and Abandonment (P&A) Plan – Outlining steps to permanently seal wells.
 Regulatory Notification and Approval – Informing authorities and obtaining approvals.
 Well Intervention and Plugging – Executing mechanical isolation and cementing operations.
 Tubing and Casing Removal – Extracting downhole hardware as part of cleanup.
 Site Remediation – Restoring the land and marine environment to regulatory standards.
 Infrastructure Decommissioning – Dismantling topside and subsea installations.
 Waste Disposal and Material Reuse – Managing waste in accordance with environmental policies.
 Submit Final Abandonment Report – Documenting completed activities for regulatory closure.
 Post-Abandonment Monitoring – Conducting ongoing environmental and structural checks as
required.

Page | 49
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Conclusions

Key Learnings from Primavera P6 Training:

 Fundamentals of Project Scheduling:

Learn how to build project schedules from scratch, including creating work breakdown
structures, activities, and assigning resources.
 P6 Software Proficiency:
Gain hands-on experience with the software, including creating filters, layouts,
baselines, and reports, according to the LinkedIn Learning course overview.
 Scheduling Best Practices:
Understand and implement best practices in scheduling, including using the critical path
method and incorporating constraints.
 Resource Management:
Learn how to create and assign resources, track effort and costs, and optimize resource
allocation.
 Project Status Tracking and Reporting:
Understand how to track project progress, baseline the plan, and generate reports using
layouts, standard reports, and the reporting wizard.
 Data Management:
Learn how to export and import project data, ensuring data integrity and facilitating
collaboration.
 Practical Application:
Apply your knowledge through real-world project simulations and exercises.
 Industry Expertise:
Benefit from instructors with years of experience in the field, who share real-world
insights and best practices.
 Flexible Learning:
Choose from various learning methods, including online video training, self-paced
courses, and in-person workshops.

Page | 50
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Benefits of Training:

 Improved Project Management Skills:

Develop a strong understanding of Primavera P6 and its features, enabling you to
effectively manage projects.
 Enhanced Communication and Collaboration:
Learn how to create clear and concise reports and presentations, facilitating better
communication with stakeholders.
 Increased Efficiency and Productivity:
Utilize P6's features to streamline project planning, tracking, and reporting, saving time
and reducing errors.
 Career Advancement:
Gain a competitive edge in the project management field by acquiring valuable
Primavera P6 skills.

Page | 51
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Scope of the future work in this discipline

In Primavera P6, the scope of planning encompasses defining and documenting the project's
objectives, deliverables, and boundaries. This includes creating a Work Breakdown Structure
(WBS) to break down project deliverables into manageable work packages. Planning in P6
also involves defining activities, their dependencies, durations, and resource requirements,
ultimately leading to a project schedule.

Elaboration:

 Defining Scope:
P6 helps project managers define the project's scope by creating a Project Breakdown
Structure (PBS) and a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). The PBS outlines the key
deliverables, while the WBS breaks these down into smaller, manageable work
packages.
 Creating a Schedule:
Once the scope is defined, P6 facilitates the creation of a project schedule by defining
activities, their durations, dependencies, and resource requirements.
 Resource Management:
P6 also supports resource planning by allowing users to allocate resources to activities
and identify potential resource conflicts.
 Monitoring and Control:
P6 provides tools for monitoring project progress against the plan, identifying potential
delays, and implementing corrective actions.
 Communication and Reporting:
P6 enables users to communicate project progress and generate reports for stakeholders,
ensuring transparency and effective communication.
 Change Management:
P6 also supports change management by allowing users to track changes to the project
scope, schedule, and resources.

 Integration with other systems: Oracle Primavera Gateway allows for connecting with
EPPM.

Page | 52
 PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

References

Society of Petroleum Engineers. (2018). Integrated Asset Modeling for Field Development. SPE-
191989- MS.

Nasirian, M., & Hajipour, A. (2020). Comprehensive Oilfield Lifecycle Optimization: A Case
Study. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 189, 106926.

BP. (2017). BP Operating Management System – Field Development Lifecycle. Internal Publication.

Oracle. (2020). Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Documentation Library. Oracle
Corporation.

Shell Global. (2015). Peterhead CCS Project Report. Shell Technical Publications.

Page | 53
PLANNERS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4TH Year Petroleum Engineering
Year 2024-25

Notes

Page | 54