Biofuel Production via Fast Pyrolysis
Biofuel Production via Fast Pyrolysis
DOI: 10.1002/er.7904
Correspondence
Vijai Kumar Gupta, Biorefining and
Summary
Advanced Materials Research Center, Fast pyrolysis of six biomasses mustard, camellia, pinewood, sawdust, bamboo,
Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Kings
and bagasse was completed at a temperature of 500 C in a fixed bed reactor and
Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh
EH9 3JG, UK. a twin-screw reactor. It was found that the yield of bio-oil varied from 48 to
Email: vijaifzd@[Link], [Link]@ 30 wt% in fixed bed reactor and 52 to 39 wt% in a twin-screw reactor, whereas
[Link]
pyrolysis gases yield ranged from 34 to 20 wt% in a fixed bed reactor and 32 to
Dan Bahadur Pal, Department of
16 wt% in twin-screw reactor and biochar yield ranged from 36 to 24 wt% in fixed
Chemical Engineering, Birla Institute of
Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 835215, bed reactor and 32 to 16 wt% in a twin-screw reactor. High heating value (HHV)
Jharkhand, India. of bio-oil was found to be maximum for bamboo (24.45 MJ/kg) biomass, whereas
Email: [Link]@[Link]
in the case of biochar, the maximum HHV was obtained for pinewood (27 MJ/
Funding information kg) and sawdust (28 MJ/kg) biomass. On the characterization of the pyrolysis
King Khalid University, Grant/Award products, it is found that char obtained comprises mainly carbon while the liquid
Number: GRP-6-42
product, that is, bio-oil, is a mixture of hydrocarbons. The pyrolysis gases consist
of a mixture of carbon monoxide, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen.
Novelty Statement
Biofuel production uses various biomasses via two different reactors that is, a
fixed bed reactor and a twin-screw reactor. The yield of oil in the range from
48 to 30 wt% in fixed bed reactor and 52 to 39 wt% in a twin-screw reactor and
biochar yield ranged from 36 to 24 wt% in fixed bed reactor and 32 to 16 wt%
in a twin-screw reactor. The high heating value (HHV) was optimum for bio-
oil produced via bamboo biomass (24.45 MJ/kg) whereas HHV for biochar pro-
duced via pyrolysis was found to be optimum for pinewood and sawdust bio-
mass (27 MJ/kg and 28 MJ/kg).
Int J Energy Res. 2022;1–9. [Link]/journal/er © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1
2 KAPOOR ET AL.
KEYWORDS
biomass, fixed bed reactor, pyrolysis, twin-screw reactor
and agricultural residues, lignin, and cellulose. All these biomass was done to remove dirt, foreign materials, dust,
feedstocks have been tested under various pyrolysis con- etc. Biomass feedstock was then crushed and sieved to
ditions and in different pyrolysis reactors. A major por- size ranges 2 mm. Biomass feedstock was then dried to
tion of research has been done using olive bagasse, wheat remove the moisture content. The pyrolysis experiments
straw (agro-biomass), pinewood (woody biomass) bio- using these biomasses were then performed at a tempera-
masses as feedstocks.11 The intermediate pyrolysis of ture of 500 C.
rapeseed as reported in the literature12 was studied in
fixed bed reactors at a temperature of 550 C with a
heating rate of 300 C/min using 0.6- to 0.85-mm particle 2.2 | Experimental setup
size solids under nitrogen flow rates of 100 cm3/min. It
resulted in about 65 wt% of bio-oil yield. Neem seed The pyrolysis experiments were performed in two differ-
pyrolysis was studied in semi-batch reactors. It resulted ent biomass pyrolysis reactors, that is, twin-screw reactor
in 38 wt% yield of bio-oil operated at 400 C to 500 C at and fixed bed reactor. The twin-screw reactor is made up
the rate of 20 C/min.13 The intermediate pyrolysis of of a horizontal pipe (AISI 316 steel). Inside the reactor
groundnut as a feedstock was investigated in the fluid- pipe, two screws each of length 565 mm are assembled
ized bed reactor at 400 C to 475 C. It resulted in 63.48 wt along the length of the reactor. The rotation of the screws
% of bio-oil.14 From all of these studies, the five basic moves the biomass along the reactor, that is, from the
parameters of the resulting oil were identified, namely, inlet toward the hot zone and then toward the outlet of
viscosity, pH, density, and low heating value (LHV) the reactor. The reactor's outer surface is covered with an
(24.56 cSt, 4.20, 1.2 kg/m3, and 31.07 MJ/kg).15 It is found electrical resistance wire to provide the heat for the pyrol-
from the literature survey that only very few studies have ysis reaction. The temperature of the reactor is monitored
been done on fixed bed and twin-screw reactors using the with the help of two K-type thermocouples, one placed
fast pyrolysis method. Biomass pyrolysis incorporates sev- inside and the other one outside of the reactor. After
eral extremely complex reactions with quite a large num- completion of the reaction, hot vapors are made to pass
ber of intermediates and end products.16 Since devising through the condenser unit to get the liquid product, that
precise reaction, mechanisms for biomass pyrolysis are is, bio-oil, while the solid product, that is, bio-char, is col-
difficult, pyrolysis models are devised in a manner that is lected in a cylindrical enclosed flask attached to the reac-
more macroscopic and empirical. This research is aimed tor. The non-condensable gases move to an exhaust
at studying the effects of various process conditions on system.
the fixed bed and screw reactor using a few sample bio- The second rector used for this study is a fixed bed
[Link] study seeks to understand the potential for reactor. This is a vertical reactor system, which consists
producing bio-oil by pyrolysis of certain biomass that is of a vertical tube made of INCONEL 800. The length of
widely available in Uttarakhand, India. The motivation the vertical tube is around 3 ft. and the inner diameter of
for the study is the need to produce renewable liquid the vertical tube is around 25 mm. The vertical tube is
fuels. For experimentation, six different types of bio- covered with the electrical furnace, which provides the
masses were collected from the local agriculture field in heat for the pyrolysis reaction. In this reactor, setup three
the Dehradun region India. The collected biomass was thermocouples are installed along with digital tempera-
washed and dried properly to make it ready for experi- ture indicators. The hot vapors produced via pyrolysis
mentation. Two types of reactors were used for the pyrol- reaction are made to pass through two glass condensers
ysis, namely fixed bed reactors and twin screw/moving where cold water is circulated for quenching the vapors
bed reactors. The experimental results obtained from that are obtained via pyrolysis to get the desired bio-oil.
both the reactors were compared based on yields The solid obtained within the reactor is cooled and is
obtained. then weighed. The gas formed is measured by making a
difference.
followed to perform the experiments was the preparation TABLE 2 ASTM standards for proximate analysis
of biomass samples, that is, the biomasses used were first Proximate analysis Standards
crushed, sieved, and dried completely. The temperature
Moisture ASTM E871
of the reactor was then set in the control panel attached
Ash ASTN E830, ASTN D 1102
to the reactor which ultimately raises the reactor temper-
ature to the required set limit. The temperature in the Volatiles ASTM E872/E897
reactor is monitored with the help of thermocouples Fixed carbon By difference
arranged along the reactor length. Three thermocouples
were being used in the case of the fixed bed reactor and
two thermocouples were used in the case of the twin-
screw reactor. The temperature of the reactor was collected and weighed. After the collection of bio-oil and
maintained constant throughout all the experimental char, the whole reactor assembly was cleaned properly
runs with the help of the temperature control panel. The with acetone.
coolant used was pumped along with the condensers.
The continuous nitrogen supply was maintained to create
an inert atmosphere inside the reactor. The motor in the 2.4 | Biomass characterization
case of the twin-screw reactor was then switched on to
rotate the twin screws in the reactor. In the case of the Elemental analysis of all biomass samples has been done
fixed bed reactor, the pre-weighed biomass sample was using an elemental analyzer (Perkin Elmer, 2400 series
kept inside the reactor for various time intervals while in II). The results of the proximate analysis, ultimate analy-
the case of the twin-screw reactor the biomass sample is sis, and high heating value are shown in Table 1. The
fed into the feeding hopper from where it moves inside proximate analysis for biomass samples was done as per
the reactor with the help of the screw arrangement. As the standard ASTM method, as shown in Table 2. The
the twin screw rotates the biomass samples move inside calorific value of all biomass feedstock is determined
the reactor where the pyrolysis reaction takes place. The through experiments in a bomb calorimeter. The theoret-
experimental run was considered complete when no bio- ical calorific value has been calculated using a modified
mass sample is observed in the feeding hopper and no Dulong equation:
gaseous product is visible at the exhaust of the reactor. At
this stage, the heater and rotational motor (in the case of MJ 33:5 wt%carbon 14:2 wt%hydrogen
CV ¼ þ
kg 100 100
the twin-screw reactor) are switched off. The nitrogen ð1Þ
supply is then stopped. The coolant pump is then 15:4 wt%oxygen
:
switched off. The bio-oil and char thus obtained are then 100
KAPOOR ET AL. 5
Pinewood tent present in the biomass affects the heat transfer rate
60 significantly, which, in turn, influences the product yield.
In this study, it was found that the high moisture content
of the biomass leads to high liquid yields. Consequently,
40
biomasses such as pinewood, sawdust, and bamboo are
more favorable in bio-oil production (related to the lignin
20 content). The ratios of moisture content, ash content, vol-
atile matter, and fixed carbon content of various bio-
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 masses have an important effect on the product yields.
Temperature (°C) The biomass containing high volatile matter results in
high quantities of bio-oil and syngas, whereas the fixed
FIGURE 1 TGA analysis for different biomasses carbon increases the biochar production. The carbon,
oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, and ash content significantly
affect the pyrolysis products. It was found that the bio-
The TGA analysis for selected biomass samples in this mass feedstocks with low nitrogen and mineral contents
study is done in a TGA instrument (TGA-Q600) with the result in high bio-oil and syngas production.
N2 flow rate maintained at 40 mL/min and a heating rate
of 10 C/min. The sample taken for TGA analysis was
10 mg. All the selected samples for this study were heated 3.3 | Product yield
to 900 C.
The amount of moisture present in the biomass sam- The amount of bio-oil and biochar produced via fast pyrol-
ples significantly affects the conversion of biomass via ysis experiments in both the reactor setup was calculated
pyrolysis, so the moisture has to be removed before carry- by weighing the biomass samples before and after each of
ing out pyrolysis. The ash content in biomass usually the experiments. The product yields are then calculated
helps in catalyzing secondary pyrolysis reactions, which based on the weight of the products formed and the weight
has a major influence on product yield while the volatile of the initial samples taken. The product streams obtained
matter content and fixed carbon present in the biomass through fast pyrolysis presence of condensate of organic
samples shows the ease with which biomass feedstocks compound, commonly known as biochar, and gaseous
can be burnt. products known as non-condensable vapors. It is observed
that a higher bio-oil yield was found for pinewood, bam-
boo, and sawdust due to their high volatile matter content.
3 | R ES U L T S A N D D I S C U S S I O N It is found that pinewood and bamboo biomasses resulted
in maximum bio-oil yield (52 wt%) and lowest biochar
3.1 | Thermogravimetric analysis yield (24 wt%). This is due to the presence of high cellulose
and hemicellulose content in the biomass which results in
Figure 1 shows the results of thermogravimetric analysis high bio-oil yields in comparison to biomass with high lig-
for six-biomass feedstock used in this study. It is found nin content.18 The high volatile matter in these biomasses
that all the six biomasses started to devolatilize between also favors high bio-oil production. A high ash content
the temperature ranges of 200 C and 300 C. Major result in a decreased production of bio-oil while the pro-
weight loss in all the biomass samples occurs at around duction of char and gas increases. Thus, a higher bio-oil
300 C to 400 C. At 400 C, the weight loss becomes steady yield can be obtained in biomasses having higher amounts
and slower; this indicates the formation of biochar, and of volatile matter and a lower amount of ash. The percent-
continued up to 500 C as a result the pyrolysis tempera- age of the lighter components was found to be lower in the
ture was chosen at 500 C. The range of degradation tem- case of the twin-screw reactor in comparison to a fixed bed
perature for Hemicellulose, Cellulose, and Lignin are reactor as also being observed by other workers.19 The
200 C to 300 C, 250 C to 350 C, and 200 C to 500 C, pyrolysis experiments were performed at the temperature
respectively.17 of 500 C, at a nitrogen flow rate of 526 mL/min, the
6 KAPOOR ET AL.
FIGURE 2 Effect of moisture content on (A) bio char yield, (B) bio-oil yield, and (C) pyrolysis gases
FIGURE 3 Experimental result of product yield from (A) fixed bed reactor and (B) screw reactor
residence time of 2 min. In the twin-screw reactor, the compared to the screw reactor. This result is due to the
screw rpm was kept at 55 rpm. The mass flow rate of bio- high heating rate in the twin-screw reactor.
mass in a screw reactor is 0.5 kg/h. The product yield from
both the reactor system is shown in Figure 3. A consider-
able amount of liquid is obtained in both the reactors, that 3.4 | Bio-oil and biochar analysis
is, auger and fixed bed reactor. From Figure 3 it can be
observed that the product yields, that is, liquid and gas are The product streams obtained through fast pyrolysis pres-
found to be different based on the reactor type. The liquid ence of condensate of organic compound better known as
yield decreases (from 2 to 10 wt%) while the gas yield oil, the solid formed commonly known as biochar, and gas-
increases (from 2 to 10 wt%) in the fixed bed reactor when eous products known as non-condensable gases. It has been
KAPOOR ET AL. 7
FIGURE 5 Experimental and theoretical calorific value of biomass samples and products: (A) fixed bed reactor; (B) screw reactor
bio-oils obtained from the pyrolysis of bamboo, mustard, guidance. The authors would like to thank the Scientific
camellia, pinewood, bagasse, and sawdust. Bridgwater25 Research Deanship at King Khalid University, Abha,
stated that a higher heating value of bio-oil is produced Saudi Arabia for their financial support through General
from higher temperatures and shorter times. Research Project under grant number (GRP-6-42).
V.K.G. would like to acknowledge the institutional
research funding supported by the Scotland’s Rural Col-
4 | C ON C L U S I ON S lege (SRUC), UK.
4. Brassard P, Godbout S, Raghavan V. Pyrolysis in auger reactors pyrolyser: product yields and its characterization. Bioresour
for biochar and bio oil production: a review. Biosyst Eng. 2017; Technol. 2015;188:258-264.
161:80-92. 17. Jahirul MI, Rasul MG, Chowdhury AA, Nanjappa A. Produc-
5. Mohanty P, Pant KK, Parikh J, Sharma DK. Liquid fuel pro- tion through biomass pyrolysis- a technological review. Ener-
duction from syngas using bifunctional CuO–CoO–Cr2O3 cata- gies. 2012;5(12):4952-5001.
lyst mixed with MFI zeolite. Fuel Process Technol. 2011;92(3): 18. Kapoor L, Bose D, Mekala A. Biomass pyrolysis in a twin-screw
600-608. reactor to produce green fuels. Biofuels. 2017;11(1):101-107.
6. Ansari KB, Kamal B, Beg S, et al. Recent developments in 19. Kapoor L. Experimental investigation of the pyrolysis of bio-
investigating reaction chemistry and transport effects in bio- mass to produce green fuels. International Journal of Sustain-
mass fast pyrolysis: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021; able Energy. 2019;38(7):692-700.
150:111454. 20. Brown JN. Development of a Lab-Scale Auger Reactor for Bio-
7. Babu BV, Chaurasia AS. Pyrolysis of biomass: improved models mass Fast Pyrolysis and Process Optimization Using Response
for simultaneous kinetics and transport of heat, mass and Surface Methodology [dissertation]. Ames, IA: Iowa State Uni-
momentum. Energy Conver Manage. 2004;45:1297-1327. versity, 2009.
8. Raza M, Inayat A, Ahmed A, et al. Progress of the pyrolyzer 21. McKendry P. Energy production from biomass (part 1): an
reactors and advanced technologies for biomass pyrolysis overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2002;83(1):37-46.
processing. Sustainability. 2021;13:11061. 22. Nanda S, Mohanty P, Kozinski JA, Dalai AK. Physico-chemical
9. Bridgwater AV. Principles and practice of biomass fast pyroly- properties of bio-oils from pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass
sis processes for liquids. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 1999;51(1):3-22. with high and slow heating rate. Energy Environ Res. 2014;4(3):
10. Tsai WT, Lee MK, Chang YM. Fast pyrolysis of rice straw, sug- 21-32.
arcane bagasse and coconut shell in an induction-heating reac- 23. Lam KL, Oyedun AO, Hui CW. Experimental and modelling
tor. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2006;76(1–2):230-237. studies of biomass pyrolysis. Chin J Chem Eng. 2012;20(3):
11. Dickerson T, Soria J. Catalytic fast pyrolysis: a review. Energies. 543-550.
2013;6(1):514-538. 24. Xu Y, Hu X, Li W, et al. Preparation and characterization of
12. Zabeti M, Nguyen TS, Lefferts L, Heeres HJ, Seshan K. In bio-oil from biomass. Progress in Biomass and Bioenergy Pro-
situ catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulose using alkali-modified duction. London, UK: IntechOpen Limited; 2010.
amorphous silica alumina. Bioresour Technol. 2012;118: 25. Bridgwater AV. Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product
374-381. upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;38:68-94.
13. Onay O, Kockar OM. Slow, fast and flash pyrolysis of rapeseed.
Renew Energy. 2003;28(15):2417-2433.
14. Ates F, Buyuktuncer H, Yasar B, Isil A, Biricik G, Koparal AS.
Comparison of non-catalytic and catalytic fast pyrolysis of How to cite this article: Kapoor L,
pomegranate and grape marcs under vacuum and inert atmo- Mohammad A, Jha JM, et al. Biofuel production
spheres. Fuel. 2019;85:1851-1859. using fast pyrolysis of various plant waste
15. Demirbas A, Arin G. An overview of biomass pyrolysis. Energy biomasses in fixed bed and twin-screw reactors. Int
Source. 2002;24(5):471-482.
J Energy Res. 2022;1‐9. doi:10.1002/er.7904
16. Tinwala F, Mohanty P, Parmar S, Patel A, Pant KK. Intermedi-
ate pyrolysis of agro-industrial biomasses in bench-scale
International Journal of Sustainable Energy
Leena Kapoor
To cite this article: Leena Kapoor (2019): Experimental investigation of the pyrolysis
of biomass to produce green fuels, International Journal of Sustainable Energy, DOI:
10.1080/14786451.2019.1566235
1. Introduction
Due to potential climate changes and high crude prices, bio fuels have attracted considerable atten-
tion of many researchers. The use of biomass provides a clean source of energy that will improve our
environment from pollution (Badea et al. 2008). The energetic and industrial usage of biomass is
becoming more and more technologically and economically attractive. Biomass can be transformed
through both thermal and biological processes into various forms of energy. The thermal process for
biomass conversion uses heat and catalysts to convert biomass into chemicals, fuels and electric
power. Mainly three thermal processes are being used for converting biomass into various useful
forms of biofuels, i.e. pyrolysis, direct combustion and gasification (Kassaye, Pant, and Jain 2017).
In recent times, a high temperature conversion process known as fast pyrolysis has increasingly
being studied to convert biomass into char and bio oil (Orfao, Antunes, and Figueiredo 1999).
Fast pyrolysis is considered one of the emerging technologies which produces more amount of liquid
product, i.e. large yield of bio oil. Though it offers high conversion efficiency, it suffers from the dis-
advantage of large energy necessities, making it energetically and economically limited. However, at
low to moderate temperature conditions processes such as hydrous pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion
transform wet biomass into bio crude and biogas, respectively. Thus in comparison to conventional
pyrolysis, hydrous pyrolysis can operate at moderate temperature conditions. With hydrous pyrol-
ysis the whole biomass can be converted to bio fuel with a relatively high solid residue, high heating
value and gaseous mixture (N2, H2, CH4, CO2, CO) along with aqueous product rich in organics
(Choudhary, Malik, and Pant 2017). The reactor temperature is considered to be one of the main
parameters that affects the yield and composition in hydrous pyrolysis (Choudhary, Malik, and
Pant 2017).
To cite this article: Leena Kapoor, Debajyoti Bose & Aditya Mekala (2017): Biomass pyrolysis in a
twin-screw reactor to produce green fuels, Biofuels, DOI: 10.1080/17597269.2017.1345360
Download by: [Australian National University] Date: 13 July 2017, At: 10:21
BIOFUELS, 2017
[Link]
Method
A twin-screw reactor was used for pyrolysis of biomass
feed through an exothermic reaction to get biofuels.
The process employed is fast pyrolysis, which is a high-
temperature process in the absence of oxygen, where
biomass is rapidly heated. The twin-screw reactor has a
compact design with the advantage that it can process
Figure 1. Schematics of the experimental setup. 1 – nitrogen
lower temperatures, but it suffers with the disadvan-
cylinder, 2 – rota meter, 3 – screw feeder, 4 – twin-screw reac-
tage of having moving parts in the hot zone. tor, 5 – char tank, 6 – condenser assembly, 7 – outlet.
The main components of the reactor system are:
1. Biomass feeding assembly given later. The overall system used in this experiment
2. Heat carrier sub-system is shown in Figure 1.
3. Auger (twin-screw) reactor assembly The equipment used for this experimental setup
4. Product recovery through condenser and char was a twin-screw reactor with a screw length of 565
tank system mm. Figure 4 (design made in SOLIDWORKS® 2014)
and accordingly the system was assembled. There
Other utilities: were two sections: the first section performed the task
of feeding and conveying the biomass, and the tem-
1. Frog pumps were installed, as well as a related perature was monitored using K-type thermocouples
piping arrangement connecting the condensers through various openings on top of the extruder. The
to one another and establishing the water circu- second portion was used for heating and mixing; the
lation network through the condensers. temperature was 454 C. Normally, the extruder wall
2. Nitrogen cylinders were used. temperature was 25–30 C lower compared to the tem-
perature of the coil used to heat it externally. There are
Three biomass sources were explored in this work, five orifices on the reactor; the diameter for each was
viz. bagasse, sawdust and pine wood. All were sub- 0.78 mm.
jected to proximate and ultimate analysis. Gross calo- Cooling water was added into the condenser using
rific value (GCV) was determined using a bomb a water pump. The moisture content of sawdust in the
calorimeter. For all of the feed materials used, the feed extruder was maintained at 5.58%. The sawdust was
preparation step discussed later explains all experi- fed by a screw feeder whose speed was maintained in
mentation including moisture analysis. This work the range of 18–30 rpm. The feed rate was highlighted
reports the formation of solid biofuel, which is the bio- in the form of rpm on the control panel. Figure 1 shows
char for all three feed materials, but due to technical the calibration to convert the feed rate from rpm to kg/
problems with electric utilities and the reactor, liquid hr for the biomass feed input.
biofuel was not achieved. However, design changes
were made which would increase the feasibility of pro-
Feed material
ducing liquid biofuel using this system.
Pinewood, bagasse and sawdust were pyrolyzed at The biomass material used for the experiments was
450 C (reactor temperature) with a nitrogen stream locally sourced from Dehradun. Bagasse and sawdust
rate of 526 mL/min at air weight. Under these condi- came in their natural form. Before each test on the
tions the nitrogen temperature at its channel in the pyrolysis reactor, samples of each feedstock were prop-
reactor was observed to be 65 § 4 C. The rotational erly prepared. Bagasse was brought from Doiwala
speed of the screw was held at 55 rpm. The tests were Sugar Plant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, whereas simple
conducted with 50 g biomass samples as portrayed wooden sawdust and pinewood sawdust were pro-
below. The temperature of the refrigerant liquid cured from local carpenters at Saharanpur Chowk, Deh-
(water) was kept at 10 C. The test conditions depended radun, Uttarakhand.
on trial runs to check effectiveness of the system which These raw materials were sieved at approximately
were completed prior to actual experimentations. The 2 mm and then analyzed. Figure 2 shows their proxi-
trial suggests the above conditions are the most mate analysis and GCV.
encouraging states for a fast pyrolysis process with the An ultimate analysis (shown in Figure 3) was done
highest yields of bio-oil, without trading off its proper- for the feeds. The sulfur content was found to be very
ties. The process yields biochar, an analysis of which is low; hence, it has been represented jointly with other
BIOFUELS 3
Reactor
The main body of the reactor consists of a horizontal
pipe made of AISI 316 steel. Inside the main pipe as
assembled, two screws run all along the pipe length.
At both ends, gears are arranged with the screw impos-
ing a rotational movement. The rotation of the screw
Figure 3. Ultimate analysis of biomass feeds used in the carries the biomass sample from the biomass inlet
systems. toward the reaction zone to the product collection
point at the other end of the pipe. An electrical resis-
tance coil over the main pipe provides heat for the
Table 1. Feed rate calibration data. reaction and defines the reaction zone. The tempera-
S. no. Screw feeder (rpm) Feed rate of biomass feed (kg/hr) ture is monitored using thermocouples located along
1 10 13.92
2 15 19.50
the pipe. Nitrogen is used as an inert carrier gas. After
3 20 24.78 completion of the reaction, char is quickly collected in
4 25 32.88 an enclosed flask, and bio-oil is collected in flasks by
5 30 44.62
rapid condensation of the hot vapors in two condensa-
tion stages. The non-condensable gases proceed to an
gases present in the system. Oxygen content is highest exhaust system.
in bagasse and carbon content is high in sawdust, For the lab-based fast pyrolysis system, a feed rate
meaning sawdust is preferable over bagasse and pine between 0.5 and 2.0 kg/hr was studied. Hence, a calcu-
wood. lated biomass feed rate of 1.0 kg/hr was selected for
All of the biomass feeds were sieved and a 2-mm carrying out all the experiments. The heat carrier was
particle size was kept constant for all materials. Then sand, mixed with biomass (1:1) and charged into the
moisture removal was done to facilitate proper pyroly- feed hopper. The SOLIDWORKS® 2014 professional
sis, followed by storage and then use in the auger reac- software was used extensively during the design phase
tor. Simultaneously, a bomb calorimeter was used for for liquid biofuel. Dimensions for the reactor are given
determining the GCV of the samples, which is given in in Table 3.
Table 2. There are two routes for the vapor to travel after the
The analysis shows pinewood to have the highest reaction: one is downstream from the product outlet
GCV, by a significant margin; this shows a greater tube of the reactor into the condenser and the same
potential of pinewood to be used especially as solid line is connected from the char tank with 0.7-in (1.77-
Twin screws
Figure 7 shows the design of the screw made in SOLID-
WORKS®, and the data for the twin screw inside the
reactor is given in Table 4. Figure 8. Dimensions for modified design (in inches).
Figure 9. Char tank before modification, with 4.84-L capacity (left), and after modification, with 6.5-L capacity (right).
1. Inlet to the condenser connected from the reac- (diameter 0.3 inches) for thermocouples for measuring
tor instead of the char tank. temperature. The remaining three slots are for the gas
2. Increase the capacity of the char tank (the tank outlets. The gas is collected from the three slots, fur-
used in this study has a capacity of 5.84 L). ther combined into one slot, and then condensed
3. Employ separate screw feeders for the entry of through a condenser and converted into bio-oil. This
biomass and sand into the system. bio-oil is the final product of the project. Some work
4. The present system has some problems with based on the suggested design and insulation has
gases escaping through leakages; these need to been done at a workshop in Delhi; this work includes
be addressed. but is not restricted to improving the functioning of
5. Temperature ranges above 500 C should be the impeller at the sand preheating section, installing
investigated; the present system uses glass wool new heating coils and new clamp fittings, increasing
as insulation for the reactor. the char tank capacity to 6.5 L (from 4.8 L) as shown in
6. Installation of a cyclone separator to remove the Figure 9, changing the electrical units (connection
suspended particles through vortex separation. related), and widening the char tank inlet from the
reactor to 25 mm (from 18 mm), as shown in Figure 8.
This work demonstrates that the formation of pyrol- Also, the temperature profile for the new study will be
ysis oil or bio-oil is a tricky process, and the proposed 600–700 C, with new temperature coils used.
design is presently being revised. Figure 7 shows the
dimensions in inches for the system that is being
designed presently.
Conclusion
In different reactors such as a fluidized bed reactor The present work ends here with the possibility of bio-
(bubbling, circulating type), rotary cone reactor, and oil production from this new, improved design. This
batch reactor, ablative conversion techniques are used work has demonstrated the system is feasible for pro-
for thermochemical (pyrolysis) processes, and different ducing biofuel, and hence it can be speculated to take
process parameters and feed composition are explored this design from R &D to commercialization. With the
to obtain green fuel (biochar) for commercialization via help of platforms such as the National Biofuel Policy,
the pyrolysis process. In general, there is no automatic pyrolysis units can cater to the need for alternative
choice regarding which type of reactor is to be used, fuel. It is believed the fast pyrolysis of biomass has the
as they all have their limitations depending on what potential to meet the global need for liquid fuels in
product is required and what the process conditions terms of petroleum substitutes, and also for other
are. Reactor choice and process conditions are totally chemicals. However, the complex mechanism of the
dependent on pyrolysis process conditions and differ- feeding system coupled with variability makes it diffi-
ent types of pyrolysis processes (slow, intermediate, cult to come up with a definitive standard process. The
fast, flash, etc.). Selection is thus based on the require- investigated parameters of reactor temperature of
ments of the end product. 350–450 C by means of heating coils, and initial flow
Figure 7 shows the top view of the reactor. Starting rate and residence time of solids of 2–4 kg/h and 6–8
from the bottom of the figure the first opening is for seconds, respectively, were used to examine the effect
the sand feed, with a motor. The second opening is for of the heating rate on the process, and it is reported
the biomass feed. Next there are several small slots that in this setup solid biochar is formed successfully
BIOFUELS 7
but the liquid product requires further system integra- [5] Hornung U, Schneider P, Hornung A, et al. Sequential
tion. Suitable changes have been proposed and are pyrolysis and catalytic low temperature reforming of
being developed presently to continue this study, wheat straw. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2009;85:145–150.
[6] Mellin P. An Euler–Euler approach to modeling biomass
which would lead to production of liquid biofuel or
fast pyrolysis in fluidized-bed reactors–Focusing on the
bio-oil from this system. It is believed that bio-oil will gas phase. Appl Therm Eng. 2013;58:344–353.
contribute significantly to fuelling transportation, heat- [7] Bridgewater A, Anthony V. Biomass fast pyrolysis. Therm
ing, or electricity generation of the future. Sci. 2004;8.2:21–50.
[8] Mohan D, Charles P, Philip S. Pyrolysis of wood/biomass
for Bio-oil: a critical review. Energ Fuel. 2006;20: 848–
Disclosure statement 889.
[9] Venderbosch H, Wolter P. Fast pyrolysis technology
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. development. Biofuel Bioprod Biorefin. 2010;4.2:178–
208
[10] Meier D, Faix O. State of the art of applied fast pyrolysis
ORCID of lignocellulosic materials—a review. Bioresour Tech-
Debajyoti Bose [Link] nol. 1999;68.1:71–77.
[11] Di Blasi C. Modeling chemical and physical processes of
wood and biomass pyrolysis. Prog Energ Combust Sci.
References 2008;34:47–90.
[12] Babu BV, Chaurasia A. Pyrolysis of biomass: improved
[1] Statista, Largest producers of CO2 in 2015. Available models for simultaneous kinetics and transport of heat,
from: [Link] mass and momentum. Energ Conver Manage.
est-emitters-of-co2-in-the-world/. 2015. (Accessed: 22/ 2004;45:1297–1327.
06/16). [13] Bridgwater AV, Czernik S. Overview of application of Bio-
[2] Chum H, Overend R. Biomass and renewable fuels. Fuel mass Fast Pyrolysis Oil. Energ Fuel. 2004;18:590–598.
Proc Technol. 2001;71:187–195. [14] McKendry P. Energy production from biomass (part 1):
[3] Bridgwater A. Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2002;83:37–46.
product upgrading. Biomass Bioenerg. 2012;38:68–94. [15] Brown J, Brown R. Process optimization of an auger
[4] Pengmei L, Chang J, Wang T, et al. A kinetic study on pyrolyzer with heat carrier using response surface meth-
biomass fast catalytic pyrolysis. Energ Fuel. odology. Bioresour Technol. 2012;103 405–414.
2004;18:1865–1869.