0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views4 pages

Student Performance Evaluation Form

The document is a Teaching Evaluation Form designed for Academic Supervisors and School Mentors to assess students' performance during class sessions. It includes criteria for planning, implementation, closure, and teacher characteristics, each rated on a scale from 1 to 5. The evaluation contributes to the overall marks for the student, with specific weightage assigned to different observation components.

Uploaded by

Amirul Syahin
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views4 pages

Student Performance Evaluation Form

The document is a Teaching Evaluation Form designed for Academic Supervisors and School Mentors to assess students' performance during class sessions. It includes criteria for planning, implementation, closure, and teacher characteristics, each rated on a scale from 1 to 5. The evaluation contributes to the overall marks for the student, with specific weightage assigned to different observation components.

Uploaded by

Amirul Syahin
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

[Link].02.

04-00

TEACHING EVALUATION FORM: 1 / 2

INSTRUCTION
1. This form is used to evaluate students’ performance during class sessions.
2. It is to be completed by the respective Academic Supervisor/School Mentor.
3. This report contributes:
a. 40% x 1 (class observation) of the total marks. (for Academic Supervisor)
b. 20% x 2 (class observations) of the total marks. (for School Mentor)

Name
UPTM ID
SCHOOL
Date & Day: Time:
Class: Syllabus: (KSSR/KSSM)
Focus: Theme:
Topic:
School Mentor/ Academic Supervisor Name:

For each criteria, please rate the student according to the following scale:

1 Poor 2 Weak 3 Average 4 Good 5 Excellent

A. PLANNING SCALE
1. Statement of Objectives.
Teaching objectives are clearly and specifically stated. 1 2 3 4 5
REMARKS:

2. Appropriateness of Objectives.
Teaching objectives are appropriate to the level and ability of the majority of the 1 2 3 4 5
students.
REMARKS:

3. Selection of teaching content.


Teaching content is appropriately adjusted to the objectives, values and abilities of 1 2 3 4 5
students.
REMARKS:

4. Organization of lesson plan.


Lesson plan is complete and neat, and is instructed according to the level and 1 2 3 4 5
sequence of presentation.
REMARKS:

TOTAL A:

B. IMPLEMENTATION SCALE
1. Set Induction
Students’ attention and interest are quickly and effectively directed to the lesson with 1 2 3 4 5
a well-signalled topic
REMARKS:

2. Presentation
Lesson is presented in a clear manner and according to the sequence and use of 1 2 3 4 5
appropriate examples
REMARKS:

3. Pace Of Lesson and Time Management


Lesson is paced according to the students’ level of comprehension ability and 1 2 3 4 5
sufficient activities for the duration of lesson
REMARKS:

4. Command of Subject Matter


Teacher exhibits a good command of subject matter 1 2 3 4 5

REMARKS:

5. Teaching Method and Strategy


Teaching method and strategy are varied and suitable to the objective and topic 1 2 3 4 5

REMARKS:

6. Use of Teaching Aids


The teacher makes systematic and effective use of the board. Teaching aids are 1 2 3 4 5
suitable to the topic and used effectively to reinforce teaching
REMARKS:

7. Speech and Language


Teacher exhibits a well-modulated voice; fluent and proficient in the language 1 2 3 4 5

REMARKS:
8. Class Interaction/Learning Environment
Student-teacher interaction is pleasant. Equal attention is given to all students; active 1 2 3 4 5
students’ participation
REMARKS:

9. Class Management
Class is managed appropriately and efficiently 1 2 3 4 5

REMARKS:

10. Question Technique


Effective question technique; form and style of questioning stimulates students’ 1 2 3 4 5
thinking
REMARKS:

11. Method of Evaluation


Evaluation method, technique and activity are appropriate to ensure that the 1 2 3 4 5
objectives are achieved
REMARKS:

TOTAL B:

C. CLOSURE SCALE
1. Conclusion of Lesson
Teacher concludes the lesson by summarizing and reinforcing facts effectively. 1 2 3 4 5
Follow-up activities are appropriate and related to the objectives.
REMARKS:

2. Achievement of Objective and Inculcation of Moral Values


The lesson covers all objectives. Teacher effectively inculcates moral values 1 2 3 4 5

REMARKS:

3. Overall Effectiveness of Teaching


Overall teaching is effectively carried out 1 2 3 4 5

REMARKS:

TOTAL C:

D. TEACHER’S CHARACTERISTICS/PERSONALITIES SCALE


1. *Teacher Reflection
Teacher is able to reflect on strengths and weaknesses of the lesson and is 1 2 3 4 5
aware of improvements to be made
REMARKS:

2. Teacher Innovativeness
Teacher exhibits positive, innovative and creative approach to teaching 1 2 3 4 5
REMARKS:

TOTAL D:

TOTAL OF A + B + C +D

( ) X 20
100

*Supervisors/Mentors are required to spend some time with the trainee teacher at the end of every observation
to reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of his/her teaching

___________________________________ ___________________________________
Name of Mentor/ Academic Supervisor Signature & Date

You might also like