0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views18 pages

Optimizing Product Distribution in Parallel Reactions

Uploaded by

mariem ali
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views18 pages

Optimizing Product Distribution in Parallel Reactions

Uploaded by

mariem ali
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

03/05/2024

Chapter 7

Design for Parallel Reactions

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 1

Product Distribution:
• The decomposition of A by either of the two paths:

• with corresponding rate equations Consider the decomposition:

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 2

1
03/05/2024

• Dividing rR by rS gives a measure of the relative rates of formation


of R and S:

• we wish this ratio to be as large as possible.

• CA is the only factor to adjust and control.

• k1, k2, a1, and a2 are all constant for a specific system at a given
temperature.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 3

• We can keep CA low by:


v Using a mixed flow reactor.
v Maintaining high conversions.
v Increasing inert in the feed.
v Decreasing the pressure in gas-phase systems.

• we can keep CA high by:

v Using a batch or plug flow reactor.


v Maintaining low conversions.
v Removing inert from the feed,
v Increasing the pressure in [Link]-
Enshirahphase
Da'na systems. 4

2
03/05/2024

• If a1 > a2, the desired reaction is of higher order than the unwanted
reaction, high reactant concentration increase the RIS ratio.
• Batch or plug flow reactor would favor formation of product R and
would require a minimum reactor size.

• If a1 < a2, the desired reaction is of lower order than the unwanted
reaction, low reactant concentration favor formation of R.

• This require large mixed flow reactor.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 5

• If a1 = a2, the two reactions are of same order,

• The product distribution is fixed by k1/k2 alone and is unaffected


by type of reactor used.
• We may control product distribution by varying k1/k2 by:
v Changing the temperature of operation. If the activation
energies of the two reactions are different, k1/k2 can vary.

v Using a catalyst with selectivity in depressing or accelerating


specific reactions.
Dr. Enshirah Da'na 6

3
03/05/2024

• For two or more reactants, combinations of high and low reactant


concentrations can be obtained by controlling the concentration of
feed materials, by having certain components in excess, and by using
the correct contacting pattern of reacting fluids.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 7

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 8

4
03/05/2024

Example 7.1:

The desired liquid-phase reaction:

is accompanied by the unwanted side reaction:

From the standpoint of favorable product distribution, order the


contacting schemes of Fig. 7.2, from the most desirable to the least
desirable.
Dr. Enshirah Da'na 9

Solution:

Dividing the two rate equations gives the ratio:

to be kept as large as possible.

we want to keep CA high, CB low.

Since the concentration dependency of B is more pronounced than of


A, it is more important to have low CB than high CA.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 10

10

5
03/05/2024

Also, if we can use an excess of a reactant, or if it is practical to


separate and recycle unconverted reactant, then improved product
distribution is possible.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 11

11

Quantitative Treatment of Product Distribution and of Reactor Size.

Consider the decomposition of A, and let 𝝋 be the fraction of A


disappearing at any instant which is transformed into desired product
R.

𝝋 is the instantaneous fractional yield of R.

For any set of reactions and rate equations 𝝋 is a function of CA, and
since CA varies through the reactor, 𝝋 will also change with position in
the reactor.
Dr. Enshirah Da'na 12

12

6
03/05/2024

let us define 𝚽 as the fraction of reacted A converted into R.

𝚽 is the overall fractional yield of R.

The 𝚽 is then the mean of 𝝋 at all points within the reactor; thus :

It is 𝚽 that really concerns us and represents the product distribution


at the reactor outlet.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 13

13

The overall fractional yields from mixed and plug flow reactors
processing A from CA0 to CAF are related by:

These expressions allow us to predict the yields from one type of reactor
given the yields from the other.
Dr. Enshirah Da'na 14

14

7
03/05/2024

For a series of 1,2, ... ,N mixed flow reactors in which the concentration
of A is CA1, CA2, ..., CAN, the overall fractional yield is obtained by
summing the fractional yields in each of the N vessels and weighting
these values by the amount of reaction occurring in each vessel. Thus

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 15

15

For mixed flow reactors, or mixed flow reactors in series, the best
outlet concentration to use, that which maximizes CR may have to be
found by maximization of rectangles.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 16

16

8
03/05/2024

Before we can safely use these relationships, we must truly have parallel
reactions in which no product influences the rate to change the product
distribution.

The easiest way to test this is to add products to the feed and verify that
the product distribution is in no way altered.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 17

17

So far, the fractional yield of R has been taken as a function of CA alone


and has been defined on the basis of the amount of this component
consumed.

More generally, when there are two or more reactants involved, the
fractional yield can be based on one of the reactants consumed, on all
reactants consumed, or on products formed.

Thus, in general, we define 𝝋(M/N) as the instantaneous fractional yield


of M, based on the disappearance or formation of N.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 18

18

9
03/05/2024

The Selectivity.

This definition may lead to difficulties. For example, if the reaction is


the partial oxidation of a hydrocarbon, as follows:

The selectivity is hard to evaluate, and not very useful. Thus, we stay
away from selectivity and use the clearly defined and useful fractional
yield, 𝝋(R/A) .
Dr. Enshirah Da'na 19

19

Example 7.2:
Consider the aqueous reactions:

For 90% conversion of A find the concentration of R in the product stream.


Equal volumetric flow rates of the A and of B streams are fed to the reactor,
and each stream has a concentration of 20 mol/L of reactant.
The flow in the reactor follows.
(a) Plug flow
(b) Mixed flow
(c) The best of the four plug-mixed contacting schemes of Example 7.1.
Dr. Enshirah Da'na 20

20

10
03/05/2024

Solution:

(a) Plug Flow

The starting concentration of each reactant in the combined feed is


CA0 = CB0 = 10 mmol/L and that CA = CB everywhere,

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 21

21

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 22

22

11
03/05/2024

(b) Mixed Flow

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 23

23

(c) Plug Flow A-Mixed Flow B


Assuming B is introduced into the reactor in such a way that CB = 1
mol/L throughout, Then accounting for the changing CA in the reactor:

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 24

24

12
03/05/2024

To summarize:

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 25

25

The Side Entry Reactor

Reactant A flowed through the tubes which contained baffles to


encourage lateral mixing of fluid and approach to plug flow.

Reactant B, to be kept at a close-to-constant low concentration in the


tubes, enters the exchanger through the shell side at a somewhat
higher pressure than that in the tubes.

Thus, B diffused into the tubes along the whole length of the tubes.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 26

26

13
03/05/2024

Example 7.3:
Often a desired reaction is accompanied by a variety of undesired side
reactions, some of higher order, some of lower order. To see which type of
single reactor gives the best product distribution, consider the simplest
typical case, the parallel decompositions of A, CA0 = 2,

Find the maximum expected C, for isothermal operations


(a) in a mixed flow reactor
(b) in a plug flow reactor
(c) in a reactor of your choice if unreacted A can be separated from the
product stream and returned [Link] feed at CA0 = 2.
Enshirah Da'na 27

27

Solution:
Since S is the desired product, let us write fractional yields in terms
of S. Thus:

Plotting this function we find the curve whose maximum occurs where :

Solving we find:
Dr. Enshirah Da'na 28

28

14
03/05/2024

(a) Mixed Flow


Most S is formed when the rectangle under the cp versus CA curve has
the largest area.
The required conditions can be found either by graphical
maximization of rectangles or analytically.
Since simple explicit expressions are
available, let us use the analytical
approach. Then :

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 29

29

Differentiating and setting to zero to find the conditions at which


most S is formed:

Evaluating this quantity gives the optimum operating conditions of a


mixed reactor as:

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 30

30

15
03/05/2024

(b)Plug Flow Reactor


The production of S is maximum when the area under the 𝝋 versus CA
curve is maximum.

This occurs at 100% conversion of A. Thus,

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 31

31

(c) Any Reactor with Separation and Recycle of Unused Reactant.


Since no reactant leaves the system unconverted, what is important
is to operate at conditions of highest fractional yield.

This is at CA = 1,where 𝝋(S/A)=0.5, Thus, we should use a mixed flow


reactor operating at CA= 1. We would then have 50% of reactant A
forming product S.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 32

32

16
03/05/2024

MFR operating at conditions of highest cp with separation and recycle


of unused reactant gives the best product distribution.

This result is quite general for a set of parallel reactions of different


order.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 33

33

Example 7.4:
For the reaction of Example 7.3 determine the arrangement of reactors
which would produce most S in a flow system where recycle and
reconcentration of unreacted feed is not possible. Find CStotal for this
arrangement of reactors.

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 34

34

17
03/05/2024

Thus, for mixed flow, from Example 7.3

For plug flow, from Example 7.3

Therefore, the total amount of C, formed is

Dr. Enshirah Da'na 35

35

18

You might also like