Understanding Landslides: Causes and Mitigation
Understanding Landslides: Causes and Mitigation
Course:
Water-Rock Interaction
Landslide is the complex phenomena involving the interaction between the various triggering and
causative in-situ factors. The study of landslides is crucial for understanding the underlying causes,
predicting their occurrence, and implementing effective mitigation strategies to mitigate their impacts.
Landslides pose significant threats to human life, infrastructure, and the natural environment, hence
understanding landslide susceptibility which refers to the likelihood of slope failure, is very important. By
comprehensively examining landslides, we can develop strategies to minimize their impacts and enhance
the resilience of vulnerable areas.
The assessment and mitigation of landslide risk requires in-depth understanding of geological,
geomorphological and engineering mechanisms. Various experts have developed qualitative,
quantitative, and deterministic methods to address landslides based on factors such as their size, type,
and frequency, as well as the scope of the study (e.g., national, regional, or site-specific) and available
resources in the area. However, the lack of universally recognized guidelines poses challenges for land
use planners, scientists, and decision makers in accurately evaluating risk and formulating effective
mitigation strategies.
Understanding landslides and their associated risks is crucial for policymakers, urban planners,
engineers, and communities at large. By gaining insights into the causes and impacts of landslides, we
can develop proactive measures to reduce their occurrence and mitigate their effects. This report aims
to serve as a valuable insight for individuals and organizations involved in disaster risk reduction, land
management, and emergency planning.
3
2. Types of Landslides
Landslides can be classified into various forms, depending on the nature of the materials involved, the
slope characteristics, and the triggering mechanisms. Understanding the different types of landslides is
essential for assessing their potential hazards and implementing appropriate mitigation strategies.
TYPE OF MATERIAL
SLIDE ROTATIONAL
Rock slide Debris slide Earth slide
S TRANSLATIONAL
FLOWS Rock flow (deep creep) Debris flow (soil creep) Earth flow (soil creep)
4
Figure 2: Types of Landslides
2.1 Rockslides
Rockslides occur when large blocks or masses of rock detach from a slope and rapidly move downhill.
They are typically triggered by the weakening of rock layers, such as through weathering, seismic activity,
or erosion. Rockslides often exhibit rapid and violent movements, posing significant risks to
infrastructure and human life in their path.
2.2 Slumps
Slumps are characterized by the downward movement of a mass of soil or rock along a curved failure
surface. The movement occurs as a rotational or sliding motion, resulting in a distinctive concave-shaped
feature on the slope. Slumps often occur in areas with weak or saturated soils, and their movement is
influenced by factors such as slope steepness, soil composition, and groundwater conditions.
2.4 Mudflows
Mudflows are similar to debris flows, but they primarily consist of fine-grained materials such as silt and
clay. They often occur in areas with abundant loose sediments and steep slopes, where heavy rainfall or
melting snow can quickly mobilize the saturated soil. Mudflows can be particularly hazardous due to
their ability to engulf and bury structures, leading to widespread damage and loss of life.
5
2.5 Earthflows
Earthflows are slow-moving landslides characterized by the gradual downslope movement of soil or
weathered rock. They typically occur in cohesive soils and are influenced by factors such as slope angle,
soil moisture content, and the presence of clay minerals. Earthflows can persist for extended periods,
gradually deforming the landscape and posing long-term risks to infrastructure and property.
However, landslides can exhibit combinations of these types, and their behavior can vary based on
specific local conditions and triggering factors.
3. Causes of Landslides
Landslides can be triggered by a combination of natural and human-induced factors. Understanding
these causes is essential for assessing the susceptibility of an area to landslides and implementing
appropriate mitigation strategies. The following sections outline some of the primary causes of
landslides:
6
stability of the soil and rocks. The elimination of vegetation diminishes the cohesive strength provided by
root systems, rendering the soil more prone to erosion and slope instability. Alterations in drainage
patterns, such as the inadequate implementation or insufficient upkeep of drainage systems, can result
in water buildup and heightened pore pressure within the soil, thereby triggering landslides.
Landslides often result from a combination of these factors, rather than a single cause. For example,
heavy rainfall on a steep slope with weak geological formations and human-induced modifications can
create the perfect conditions for a landslide event. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the
interplay between these causes is crucial for assessing landslide hazards and implementing effective
mitigation strategies.
4. Landslide Susceptibility
Landslide susceptibility refers to the degree to which an area or slope is predisposed to experience
landslides. It is a measure of the vulnerability of a location to slope failure and provides valuable
information for understanding and managing landslide hazards. Landslide susceptibility assessments are
conducted to identify areas that are prone to landslides, enabling proactive measures to be taken for
land-use planning, infrastructure development, and disaster risk reduction.
Landslide susceptibility refers to the likelihood of a particular area experiencing landslides based on a
combination of factors. Understanding these factors is essential for assessing the vulnerability of an area
and implementing appropriate measures to mitigate landslide risks. The process of determining landslide
susceptibility involves analyzing various factors that contribute to slope instability. Some of the key
factors that contribute to landslide susceptibility are:
a) Slope Gradient:
Slope gradient is a critical factor in landslide susceptibility. Steeper slopes are more prone to landslides
as the gravitational forces acting on the slope exceed the strength of the materials holding them
together. Higher slope gradients increase the driving force for landslides and can result in more frequent
and rapid movements of soil and rock.
b) Soil Properties:
The properties of the soil, such as its composition, cohesion, permeability, and shear strength, influence
landslide susceptibility. Soils with high clay content have lower permeability, making them more prone to
saturation and increased pore water pressure, leading to reduced shear strength and potential failure.
Additionally, cohesive soils with low strength are more susceptible to landslides compared to well-
drained, sandy soils.
c) Vegetation Cover:
Vegetation plays a crucial role in stabilizing slopes and reducing landslide susceptibility. The root systems
of plants help bind soil particles together, increasing slope stability and reducing erosion. Areas with
dense vegetation cover are less susceptible to landslides compared to areas with sparse or no
vegetation.
d) Water Content:
Water content is a significant factor influencing landslide susceptibility. Saturation of soil due to
excessive rainfall or melting snow increases pore water pressure and reduces the effective stress within
7
the soil mass. This weakened condition reduces the shear strength of the soil, making it more susceptible
to landslides. Areas with poor drainage or high groundwater levels are particularly vulnerable.
e) Seismic Activity:
Seismic activity, such as earthquakes, can significantly affect landslide susceptibility. Earthquakes
generate strong ground shaking that can destabilize slopes and decrease the frictional resistance
between soil particles. Seismic events can trigger landslides directly through ground shaking or indirectly
by increasing pore water pressure in saturated soils.
However, the above-mentioned factors do not act in isolation but interact with each other. For example,
a steep slope with cohesive clayey soil and heavy rainfall can create a high landslide susceptibility zone.
To assess landslide susceptibility accurately, it is necessary to consider and integrate multiple factors and
their spatial distribution within a given area.
Geotechnical investigations, slope stability analysis, and terrain mapping using remote sensing and GIS
technologies can help identify areas with high landslide susceptibility. Various methods are available for
assessing landslide susceptibility, ranging from qualitative to quantitative approaches.
Qualitative methods rely on expert knowledge and experience to interpret geological and
geomorphological data, identify potential landslide sources, and delineate susceptible areas based on
visual analysis. This approach is commonly used in preliminary assessments or areas with limited data
availability. Some of the methods employed for the qualitative analysis are Analytic hierarchy process,
Spatial multi-criteria analysis, Weighted linear combination, Predictive modelling, etc. Quantitative
methods, on the other hand, employ statistical and mathematical models to analyze large datasets and
establish relationships between landslide occurrences and the contributing factors. Quantitative
methods include statistical analysis, geotechnical engineering approaches, soft computing technique and
some hybrid methods. These models use various techniques such as logistic regression, artificial neural
networks, decision trees, and geographic information systems (GIS) to create susceptibility maps. These
maps assign different susceptibility levels to different areas, ranging from low to high susceptibility,
providing a spatial representation of the landslide-prone zones.
By understanding susceptibility of an area to landslides, engineers, geologists, and planners can make
informed decisions regarding land-use planning, infrastructure design, and the implementation of
appropriate mitigation measures to minimize the risks associated with landslides.
5. Landslide Hazard
Landslide hazard refers to the likelihood of a potentially damaging landslide occurring within a specific
area and time frame. It involves assessing the temporal probability (when and how frequently) and
spatial probability (where) of landslide occurrences. By determining the conditional probability of
landslide magnitude, location, and timing, hazard assessments provide valuable information for
understanding the risks associated with landslides.
To assess regional landslide hazard, several types of data need to be derived: spatial probability
(represented by a Susceptibility Map), temporal probability, and magnitude probability. However,
creating hazard maps can be challenging as they often rely on historical landslide records, which may be
insufficient or not readily available. Establishing a clear correlation between these records and the
8
triggering factors, such as rainfall, earthquakes, or volcanic activity, is essential to accurately derive
temporal probabilities. Therefore, hazard maps often tend to be qualitative in nature due to these
limitations.
Various approaches are used for landslide hazard assessment, including heuristic methods, empirical
probability models, and other indirect approaches. Heuristic methods involve expert judgment to assign
probabilities to specific outcomes using event trees. Empirical probability models treat landslides as
recurrent, independent, and random events, calculating the annual probability based on the frequency
of historical landslide events. Other indirect approaches involve establishing magnitude-frequency
relationships to determine thresholds for rainfall or earthquakes, as well as intensity-frequency
relationships that consider the damage potential of landslides through vulnerability curves.
In some cases, a combination of these methods is used to achieve a more comprehensive assessment of
landslide hazard. For site-specific hazard assessments, geomechanical and hydrological parameters are
utilized to determine the factor of safety for slope stability. These assessments involve using site-specific
details and modeling techniques such as finite element method or finite difference method. Overall,
landslide hazard assessment plays a crucial role in understanding and managing the risks associated with
landslides.
6. Landslide Vulnerability
Landslide vulnerability refers to the extent of potential loss experienced by elements at risk in an
affected area. The estimation of landslide vulnerability depends on various factors such as the type of
landslide, scale of analysis, and the elements at risk involved. Vulnerability assessment primarily focuses
on determining the physical vulnerability of structures (such as buildings and roads) and the social
vulnerability of people exposed to different types and scales of landslide risks. When assessing physical
vulnerability, factors such as the type of structure, proximity to landslide hazards, structural strength,
occupancy, and importance may be considered and expressed in terms of monetary value or a
predefined ranking.
Social vulnerability, on the other hand, takes into account the number of people, age groups, ability to
cope with risks, socio-economic status, and other relevant factors during a given time period. Qualitative
approaches, relying on expert judgment, are commonly used to assess physical vulnerability, while
quantitative methods are employed to determine socio-economic vulnerabilities by investigating
landslide phenomena and the characteristics of vulnerable elements. Some researchers also propose
semi-quantitative methods for regional vulnerability assessments.
9
geographic information systems (GIS), and numerical modeling. Remote sensing technologies such as
satellite imagery and aerial photography provide valuable data for identifying potential landslide
indicators. GIS platforms help integrate and analyze different spatial datasets, aiding in the identification
of hazardous areas. Numerical modeling techniques, such as slope stability analysis, assist in simulating
and predicting landslide behavior under different conditions.
The assessment process moves to the hazard zonation phase which involves dividing the study area into
zones based on the level of landslide hazard. Typically, zones are classified as low, moderate, high, and
very high hazards. This zoning allows authorities to prioritize areas for mitigation efforts, land-use
planning, and evacuation plans.
a) Hazard Mapping: The first step is to identify and map areas that are prone to landslides. This is
done by analyzing geological and topographical data, including slope angles, soil types, and the
presence of previous landslides. Advanced technologies such as remote sensing and LiDAR (Light
Detection and Ranging) can provide valuable information for hazard mapping.
b) Inventory of Vulnerable Elements: An inventory of elements at risk is created, including buildings,
roads, bridges, and other infrastructure, as well as human populations and environmental
features. This step helps identify the potential consequences of landslides in terms of damage and
loss of life.
c) Vulnerability Assessment: The vulnerability of elements at risk is evaluated to determine their
susceptibility to landslides. This assessment considers factors such as structural integrity, age,
maintenance, and the level of exposure to landslide-prone areas. It helps prioritize areas and
assets that require immediate attention for mitigation measures.
d) Probability Analysis: The likelihood of landslides occurring is assessed based on historical records,
geological studies, and statistical models. Factors such as rainfall patterns, slope stability, and
geological characteristics are taken into account to estimate the probability of landslide events.
e) Consequence Analysis: The potential impacts of landslides on human life, infrastructure, and the
environment are evaluated. This analysis considers factors such as potential casualties, economic
losses, and environmental degradation. It helps quantify the potential consequences and prioritize
mitigation efforts.
f) Risk Evaluation: The combination of probability and consequence analysis results in the
assessment of landslide risk. Risk is often expressed as a function of the probability of an event
occurring and the magnitude of its potential consequences. This evaluation helps decision-makers
understand the severity of the risk and prioritize appropriate mitigation measures.
10
g) Mitigation Planning: Based on the findings of the risk assessment, mitigation measures are
developed to reduce the potential impact of landslides. These measures can include engineering
solutions, such as slope stabilization techniques, retaining walls, and drainage systems, as well as
land-use planning, early warning systems, and public awareness campaigns. The effectiveness and
feasibility of these measures are evaluated, and an implementation plan is devised.
The landslide risk assessment is an iterative process, as new data and information become available over
time. Regular monitoring, updating of hazard maps, and reassessment of risk are essential to ensure the
effectiveness of mitigation strategies and adapt to changing conditions. Landslide risk assessment plays a
crucial role in minimizing the potential impacts of landslides on communities, infrastructure, and the
environment. By identifying high-risk areas and implementing appropriate mitigation measures, it helps
safeguard lives and property, promote sustainable development, and improve overall resilience in
landslide-prone regions.
9. Impacts of Landslides
Landslides can have severe and wide-ranging impacts on both human and natural environments.
Understanding the consequences of landslides is crucial for developing effective strategies to mitigate
their effects and enhance the resilience of vulnerable areas. The following sections discuss some of the
significant impacts of landslides:
Landslides can result in the loss of human life and cause severe injuries. Rapid-moving landslides, such as
debris flows or rockslides, can engulf and bury communities, trapping people within the debris. The
sudden and violent nature of landslides often leaves little time for evacuation or escape, making them
particularly hazardous. Additionally, landslides can damage or destroy infrastructure, further increasing
the risk of casualties.
b) Damage to Infrastructure:
Landslides can cause extensive damage to infrastructure, including buildings, roads, bridges, pipelines,
and utility systems. Collapsed slopes can bury roads, disrupt transportation networks, and damage
critical infrastructure, leading to the isolation of communities and hindering emergency response efforts.
Infrastructure repairs and reconstruction following landslides can be costly and time-consuming,
impacting local economies and development.
Landslides can disrupt transportation networks, leading to significant logistical challenges. Road closures,
bridge failures, and the interruption of rail and air transport can isolate communities, affect commerce,
and hinder access to essential services, such as healthcare and emergency response. The
reestablishment of transportation routes in landslide-affected areas often requires substantial resources
and time.
d) Environmental Consequences:
11
Landslides can have significant environmental consequences. The movement of soil and rock can result
in the destruction of natural habitats and the loss of biodiversity. Landslides can also block waterways,
leading to the formation of temporary or permanent barriers that alter drainage patterns and cause
flooding. The deposition of sediment in rivers and streams can impact aquatic ecosystems, affecting
water quality and the habitats of aquatic species.
e) Economic Impacts:
Landslides can impose substantial economic burdens on affected communities and regions. The costs
associated with rescue and recovery operations, infrastructure repairs, and restoration efforts can be
significant. Businesses may suffer from disrupted operations and reduced customer access, leading to
income loss and economic downturn. Additionally, the long-term economic recovery of landslide-
affected areas can be challenging, as it often involves rebuilding infrastructure, restoring utilities, and
reestablishing local economies.
The impacts of landslides can be long-lasting and extend beyond the immediate event. The psychological
and social impacts on affected individuals and communities, such as trauma, displacement, and loss of
livelihoods, should also be considered. By understanding the diverse impacts of landslides, proactive
measures can be taken to minimize risks, improve emergency preparedness, and implement sustainable
land-use planning practices in landslide-prone areas.
Land-use planning and zoning regulations play a crucial role in preventing landslides. Identifying and
mapping landslide-prone areas helps inform decisions on land development, construction activities, and
infrastructure placement. Restricting or prohibiting construction in high-risk areas helps minimize
exposure to landslide hazards and protects vulnerable communities.
b) Slope Stabilization:
Slope stabilization techniques aim to enhance the stability of slopes and reduce the potential for
landslides. These techniques may include the use of retaining walls, slope reinforcement with
geosynthetics or soil nails, installation of drainage systems to control water infiltration, and regrading or
terracing steep slopes. Proper engineering design and construction practices are essential to ensure the
effectiveness of these stabilization measures.
c) Vegetation Management:
Maintaining and promoting healthy vegetation cover is an effective strategy for slope stabilization.
Planting trees, shrubs, and ground cover on slopes helps bind soil particles together, reduces erosion,
and enhances slope stability. The root systems of plants increase slope cohesion and reduce the
12
movement of soil and rock materials. Vegetation also plays a crucial role in regulating water infiltration
and preventing excessive saturation of the soil.
Proper surface water management is essential in preventing landslides. Effective drainage systems,
including the installation of surface and subsurface drains, help control the flow of water and reduce the
buildup of pore water pressure within slopes. Diverting water away from slopes, implementing erosion
control measures, and preventing the concentration of water runoff on vulnerable areas can significantly
reduce landslide risks.
Implementing early warning systems, as discussed in the previous section, can provide timely
information about potential landslides, enabling early evacuation and the implementation of protective
measures. Continuous monitoring of slope behavior, rainfall patterns, and other relevant parameters
allows for the detection of precursory signs of instability. Early warning systems should be integrated
with robust communication networks to ensure effective dissemination of warnings to at-risk
communities.
Public education and awareness programs are vital in mitigating landslide risks. Informing communities
about the hazards and risks associated with landslides, as well as providing guidance on preparedness,
response, and evacuation procedures, can help save lives and reduce the impacts of landslides.
Educating communities, particularly those living in landslide-prone areas, promotes a culture of safety
and encourages proactive measures to minimize risks.
Continuous monitoring of slope behavior, geological conditions, and weather patterns is crucial for
understanding landslide processes and identifying potential hazards. Investing in research and
development initiatives to improve landslide prediction models, enhance monitoring techniques, and
advance mitigation strategies is essential for reducing vulnerability to landslides. Ongoing monitoring
and research efforts provide valuable data for informed decision-making and the refinement of
mitigation approaches.
It is important to note that no single strategy can eliminate all landslide risks entirely. A comprehensive
and integrated approach that combines land-use planning, engineering measures, early warning
systems, and community engagement is necessary for effective landslide mitigation. By implementing
these strategies, authorities and communities can reduce the impacts of landslides, protect lives and
infrastructure, and enhance the resilience of landslide-prone areas.
13
a) Importance of Landslide Monitoring:
Landslide monitoring serves as a proactive approach to identify and monitor areas prone to landslides.
By continuously monitoring slope behavior and detecting changes in ground conditions, it is possible to
detect signs of impending landslides and trigger appropriate response actions. Monitoring provides
essential data for understanding the behavior of slopes, assessing the effectiveness of mitigation
measures, and improving our understanding of landslide processes.
An effective early warning system for landslides consists of several key components:
Geotechnical Monitoring:
Geotechnical monitoring involves the use of various instruments and techniques to measure slope
behavior and detect signs of instability. These may include inclinometers to monitor slope movement,
piezometers to measure groundwater pressure, and extensometers to monitor deformation. Continuous
monitoring of these parameters provides valuable data for identifying potential landslide triggers and
assessing slope stability.
Meteorological Monitoring:
Meteorological monitoring is crucial for assessing rainfall patterns and identifying conditions that may
contribute to landslides. Rainfall data, including intensity, duration, and cumulative rainfall, can be
measured using rain gauges or weather radar systems. This information helps identify rainfall thresholds
that may trigger landslides and provides input for early warning systems.
Remote Sensing:
Remote sensing technologies, such as satellite imagery, aerial photography, and LiDAR (Light Detection
and Ranging), can be used to monitor and map landslide-prone areas. These techniques provide valuable
data on slope morphology, vegetation cover, and land surface changes over time. Remote sensing data
can be integrated with ground-based monitoring data to enhance landslide monitoring and assessment.
An effective early warning system requires robust data acquisition and communication infrastructure.
This includes reliable data loggers, sensors, and telemetry systems to collect and transmit monitoring
data in real-time. The data should be processed, analyzed, and disseminated to relevant stakeholders
through a well-defined communication network, ensuring timely and accurate warnings are delivered to
at-risk communities and authorities.
Landslide early warning systems should incorporate risk assessment models and decision support tools.
These tools help evaluate the potential impacts of landslides, assess vulnerability and exposure of assets,
and support decision-making processes for implementing appropriate response actions. By integrating
real-time monitoring data with predictive models, authorities can make informed decisions regarding
evacuation, road closures, and emergency response measures.
14
An effective early warning system is only beneficial if communities are prepared to respond
appropriately. Public awareness and education programs play a vital role in informing communities
about the risks associated with landslides and the necessary actions to take in response to warnings.
Community drills, evacuation plans, and the dissemination of clear and actionable information are
essential for ensuring timely and effective response measures.
By combining comprehensive landslide monitoring techniques with well-designed early warning systems,
authorities and communities can be better prepared to respond to landslide threats. Early warning
systems provide crucial time for evacuation, implementation of protective measures, and the reduction
of potential casualties and infrastructure damage. Continuous monitoring and improvement of these
systems are necessary to enhance their effectiveness and ensure the safety of landslide-prone areas.
12. Conclusion
Landslides are natural hazards that pose significant risks to human lives, infrastructure, and the
environment. Understanding the causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies associated with landslides is
crucial for reducing vulnerabilities and enhancing the resilience of landslide-prone areas. This report has
provided an overview of landslides, including their types, causes, factors affecting landslide susceptibility,
impacts, monitoring and early warning systems, and mitigation strategies. It highlighted the importance
of comprehensive land-use planning, slope stabilization techniques, vegetation management, and
effective surface water management in reducing landslide risks.
Landslides can have devastating consequences, resulting in loss of life, injuries, damage to infrastructure,
disruption of transportation networks, and environmental degradation. The impacts extend beyond the
immediate event, affecting the socioeconomic well-being of affected communities and regions. To
address landslide risks, the implementation of early warning systems is crucial. By integrating
geotechnical monitoring, meteorological data, remote sensing, and effective communication networks,
authorities can provide timely warnings to at-risk communities, enabling evacuation and the
implementation of protective measures.
Mitigation and prevention strategies, such as land-use planning, slope stabilization, vegetation
management, and community education, play a vital role in reducing landslide risks. By adopting
proactive measures and implementing best practices, the impacts of landslides can be minimized. The
real-world examples of landslide events, demonstrates the complexity and varied nature of landslides.
Those landslide cases emphasized the need for comprehensive risk assessment, improved infrastructure
design, and sustainable land-use practices to mitigate landslide hazards.
In conclusion, the management of landslide risks requires a multi-faceted approach that combines
scientific understanding, effective monitoring and early warning systems, community engagement, and
robust mitigation strategies. By implementing these measures, we can reduce the impacts of landslides,
protect lives and infrastructure, and build more resilient communities in landslide-prone areas.
Continuous research, monitoring, and improvement of landslide management practices are essential for
enhancing our understanding of landslides and further advancing mitigation efforts in the future.
15
16
13. References
1. Aleotti, P., & Chowdhury, R. (1999). Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and
perspectives. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 21-44.
2. Crozier, M., & Clage, T. (2005). Landslide Hazard and Risk: Issues, Concepts and Approach. In
Landslide Hazard and Risk. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
3. Cruden, D., & Varnes, D. (1996). Landslide Types and Processes. Transportation Research Board,
36-75.
4. Dai, F., Lee, C., & Ngai, Y. (2002). Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview.
Engineering Geology, 65-87.
5. Fell, R., Corominas, J., Bonnard, C., Cascini, L., Leroi, E., & Savage, W. (2008). Guidelines for
landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Engineering Geology.
6. Glade, T. (2014). Landslide Risk Assessment. In Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment (pp.
21-44).
8. Highland, L., & Bobrowsky, P. (2008). The landslide handbook- A gide to understanding
landslides. U.S. Geological Survey Circular.
9. Lee, E. M., & Jones, D. K. (2014). Landslide Risk Assessment. ICE Publishing.
10. Varnes, D. (1958). Landslides types and processes. Highway Research Board.
11. Varnes, D. (1984). LAndslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice.
17