ResNet-CNN for Plant Disease Detection
ResNet-CNN for Plant Disease Detection
Abstract—The development of an economy's ability to image processing-based tools are prevalent, researchers are
innovate is directly linked to the progress of its agriculture exploring other methodologies such as natural language-
sector. The main objective of this project is to incorporate deep guided, rule-based engines. Although most apps currently
learning models in the development of a Plant Disease Detection provide suggestions to farmers on managing invasive species,
and Classification Network (PDDC-Net). In addition, the manual techniques involving agronomy specialists are still
preprocessing stage was conducted to eliminate different types necessary to expand the knowledge base [5]. Integrating
of interference, hence standardizing the images contained in the diverse data sources remains challenging, but ontologies and
dataset. Furthermore, the PDDC-Net implements the operation semantic technologies show promise in integrating data from
by utilizing a ResNet-CNN, which is a convolutional neural
various application domains. Natural language processing
network that incorporates residual networks, for the specific
tasks of extracting features and performing classification. The
methods can automatically populate ontologies with data from
recommended PDDC-Net model achieved a satisfactory Spanish unstructured sources, enabling access to information
accuracy rate in detecting and classifying plant leaf diseases, as on plant diseases and pests [6]. Through these advancements,
evidenced by the test results. The proposed model tested on a unique method of presenting plant disease symptoms based
various crop diseased leaves such as potato, tomato, and pepper on observations and the synergy of plant parts has been
with an accuracy of 99.84% suggested. Additionally, a knowledge-based agricultural pest
recognizer capable of distinguishing between overlapping
Keywords— PDDC-Net, ResNet-CNN, Plant Disease pests has been developed. The proposed architecture is easily
Detection, agricultural specialists, plant pathologists expandable to include visual evidence and other types of data,
further enhancing its capabilities. Traditional approaches [7]
I. INTRODUCTION to pest monitoring and detection in agriculture, such as manual
On a worldwide scale, India is the second-largest food monitoring, sticky traps, and black light traps, require
producer, offering employment opportunities to a wide variety significant time and rely on trained experts to identify pests.
of households. Given the industry's significant market size, it Pathogens, which are agents that cause sickness, often
is imperative to increase output levels across the board. manifest on plant leaves or stems. Accurately identifying
Approximately 67 percent of the labor force is engaged in plants, leaves, and stems, as well as detecting pests and
agriculture, indicating that nearly two-thirds of the population diseases, the frequency of pest or disease occurrences, and the
relies on the agricultural sector for sustenance. However, signs of infestation are critical components of successful crop
current farming techniques lack proper irrigation infrastructure cultivation. Both living agents (biotic agents) and non-living
and services, resulting in negative environmental impacts. substances (abiotic agents) can harm or kill plants [8]. Living
These challenges, including inadequate irrigation, crop loss agents include insects, bacteria, fungi, and viruses, while non-
due to water shortage and floods, poor seed quality, and lack living agents encompass extreme temperatures, moisture
of cold storage, can lead to failed harvests and waste of abundance, inadequate light, nutrient deficiencies,
resources [1]. The term "e-agriculture," which refers to the use unfavourable soil pH, and air pollution [9]. Deep learning [10]
of information and communication technology in agriculture, has made significant advancements in digital image
is gaining global popularity [2]. E-agriculture, or electronic processing, surpassing traditional techniques. Researchers are
agriculture, encompasses the integration of technology in increasingly concerned with how to utilize deep learning
agricultural settings. Smart farming, a subset of precision technology for plant disease and pest detection, as it holds
agriculture, involves utilizing contemporary information great potential in this field.
technology (IT) to optimize productivity and efficiency. Using The remaining parts of the paper are organized as described
global positioning systems (GPS) and geographic information in the following: The thorough analysis of the literature survey
systems (GIS) for precision farming is one example of a use of with its limitations is presented in section 2. Section 3 gives
information technology in agriculture. Other examples include the detailed analysis of proposed ResNet-CNN feature
e-learning apps for smartphones and agroadvisory services, extraction. Section 4 gives the detailed simulation analysis of
and RFID technology for product monitoring [3]. These proposed method. Further, the conclusion of the proposed is
technologies improve various aspects of agriculture, such as presented in section 5.
weather monitoring, soil preparation, sowing schedules, farm
management, soil fertility, crop nutrition, insect control, II. LITERATURE SURVEY
irrigation, drainage, and research applications [4].In the
context of diagnosing plant diseases and pests, information and Harikrishna, et al. [11] proposed Recognition of Crop
communication technology (ICT) is increasingly used. While Disease and Pesticide Suggestion using Convolution Neural
Network. The primary persistence of this investigation is to
A. Dataset
The Plant Disease Image Dataset (PDID) is a specialized
dataset that primarily focuses on leaf diseases as shown in (a)
Figure 3. It contains a collection of high-quality images
showcasing both healthy and diseased leaves caused by
various pathogens. The PDID serves as a valuable resource for
researchers and practitioners interested in studying rice
diseases and developing models for disease detection in plants.
By utilizing this dataset, scientists can enhance their
understanding of diseases and explore innovative methods for
identifying and managing them.
B. Performance evaluation
Figure 4 shows the ResNet-CNN architecture layers pro.
The ResNet-CNN architecture typically consists of several
repeating blocks, each containing convolutional layers, (b)
activation functions (such as ReLU), and shortcut connections.
These shortcut connections allow the network to learn residual
mappings, enabling better gradient flow and alleviating the
vanishing gradient problem. The CONV2D layer performs
proposed PDDC-Net method surpasses DTC [16] with a
substantial improvement of 8.15%. The F1-Measure of the
proposed PDDC-Net method demonstrates a significant
improvement of 2.36% compared to DTC [16].
Table 1. Performance evaluation
Method Accuracy Precision Recall F1-Measure
SVM [13] 80.0 92.77 85.76 88.86
LRC [15] 86.66 95.00 89.61 93.41
DTC [16] 96.66 93.33 90.0 96.42
V. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the ResNet-CNN architecture combined
with crop disease identification that the PDDC-Net presented
achieves remarkable performance in terms of accuracy,
precision, recall, and F1-Measure. Compared to the baseline
methods SVM, LRC, and DTC, PDDC-Net demonstrates
significant improvements in all metrics. It outperforms SVM
in accuracy by 19.8%, LRC in accuracy by 13.18%, and DTC
in accuracy by 3.34%. The precision, recall, and F1-Measure
of PDDC-Net also exhibit notable improvements compared to
(d) the baseline methods. These results highlight the effectiveness
Fig. 5. Sanple prediction on test data. of the PDDC-Net approach in accurately detecting and
recognizing crop diseases, making it a promising model for
crop disease identification and management. Integrating the
PDDC-Net model with real-time monitoring systems and
deploying it in smart agriculture settings. This would enable
farmers to receive instant notifications and take prompt actions
to mitigate crop diseases, thereby minimizing yield losses.
REFERENCES
[1] El Mane, Adil, et al. "Agriculture Supply Chain Management Based on
Blockchain Architecture and Smart Contracts." Applied Computational
Intelligence and Soft Computing 2022 (2022).
[2] Chen, Ximing, and Jie Shang. "Analysis of Farmers’ Willingness to Use
Blockchain and Influencing Factors Based on the Binary Logit Model."
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2022 (2022).
[3] Tsolakis, Naoum, et al. "Sustainability in the digital farming era: A
cyber-physical analysis approach for drone applications in agriculture
Fig. 6. Accuracy and loss comparision graph. 4.0." Information and Communication Technologies for Agriculture—
Theme IV: Actions. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. 29-
Table 1 compares the performance evaluation of various 53.
plant disease detection classifiers. The proposed PDDC-Net [4] Rathod, Meenakshi L., et al. "Cloud Computing and Networking for
SmartFarm AgriTech." Journal of Nanomaterials 2022 (2022).
method demonstrates a significant improvement of 19.8% in
[5] Maraveas, C., et al. "Applications of IoT for optimized greenhouse
accuracy compared to SVM [13]. The precision of the environment and resources management." Computers and Electronics
proposed PDDC-Net method outperforms SVM [13] with an in Agriculture 198 (2022): 106993.
improvement of 6.53%. The recall achieved by the proposed [6] Debauche, Olivier, et al. "Cloud and distributed architectures for data
PDDC-Net method shows a remarkable improvement of management in agriculture 4.0: Review and future trends." Journal of
14.24% compared to SVM [13]. The F1-Measure of the King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences 34.9 (2022):
7494-7514.
proposed PDDC-Net method exhibits a substantial
[7] Habeeb, Rimsha, et al. "A Proposed Comparative Algorithm for
improvement of 10.19% compared to SVM [13]. Regional Crop Yield Assessment: An Application of Characteristic
Objects Method." Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2022 (2022).
Compared to LRC [15], the proposed PDDC-Net method
[8] Dahane, Amine, Rabaie Benameur, and Bouabdellah Kechar. "An IoT
achieves a notable improvement of 13.18% in accuracy. The low-cost smart farming for enhancing irrigation efficiency of
precision of the proposed PDDC-Net method surpasses LRC smallholders farmers." Wireless Personal Communications (2022): 1-
[15] with an improvement of 4.3%. The recall achieved by the 38.
proposed PDDC-Net method outperforms LRC [15] with a [9] Yang, He, et al. "Deep Learning Agricultural Information Classification
significant improvement of 8.54%. The F1-Measure of the Combined with Internet of Things Technology in Agricultural
Production and Economic Management." IEEE Access 10 (2022):
proposed PDDC-Net method demonstrates a substantial 54713-54719.
improvement of 5.59% compared to LRC [15]. The proposed [10] Thomas, Rosemary J., Gregory O'Hare, and David Coyle.
PDDC-Net method exhibits an impressive improvement of "Understanding technology acceptance in smart agriculture: A
3.34% in accuracy compared to DTC [16]. Compared to DTC systematic review of empirical research in crop production."
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 189 (2023): 122374.
[16], the precision of the proposed PDDC-Net method shows
[11] Harikrishna, A., et al. "Recognition of Crop Disease and Pesticide
a notable improvement of 5.97%. The recall achieved by the Suggestion using Convolution Neural Network." Turkish Journal of
Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT) 14.2 (2023): [16] Kumar, Sandeep, Rajeev Ratan, and J. V. Desai. "Cotton Disease
394-403. Detection Using TensorFlow Machine Learning Technique." Advances
[12] Marwaha, Sudeep, et al. "Application of Artificial Intelligence and in Multimedia 2022 (2022).
Machine Learning in Agriculture." Translating Physiological Tools to [17] Shaikh, Tawseef Ayoub, et al. "Machine Learning for Smart
Augment Crop Breeding. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. Agriculture and Precision Farming: Towards Making the Fields Talk."
441-457. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 29.7 (2022): 4557-
[13] Singh, Kamred Udham, et al. "An artificial neural network-based pest 4597.
identification and control in smart agriculture using wireless sensor [18] Murali, E., and S. Margret Anouncia. "Visualization of Multiple
networks." Journal of Food Quality 2022 (2022). Ontology Agro Knowledge Mining Model." International Journal of
[14] Lanjewar, Madhusudan G., and Kamini G. Panchbhai. "Convolutional Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 29.05 (2022): 2241001.
neural network based tea leaf disease prediction system on smart phone [19] Yadav, Sargam, et al. "Disruptive technologies in smart farming: an
using paas cloud." Neural Computing and Applications 35.3 (2023): expanded view with sentiment analysis." AgriEngineering 4.2 (2022):
2755-2771. 424-460.
[15] Shaikh, Tawseef Ayoub, Tabasum Rasool, and Faisal Rasheed Lone. [20] Gupta, Sandeep, et al. "Machine learning-and feature selection-enabled
"Towards leveraging the role of machine learning and artificial framework for accurate crop yield prediction." Journal of Food Quality
intelligence in precision agriculture and smart farming." Computers and 2022 (2022): 1-7.
Electronics in Agriculture 198 (2022): 107119.