22/08/2025, 20:33 Representative democracy - Wikipedia

Representative democracy
Representative democracy, also known as indirect democracy or electoral democracy, is a
type of democracy where elected delegates represent a group of people, in contrast to direct
democracy.[1] Nearly all modern Western-style democracies function as some type of representative
democracy: for example, the United Kingdom (a unitary parliamentary constitutional monarchy),
Germany (a federal parliamentary republic), France (a unitary semi-presidential republic), and the
United States (a federal presidential republic).[2] Unlike liberal democracy, a representative
democracy may have de facto multiparty and free and fair elections, but may not have a fully
developed rule of law and additional individual and minority rights beyond the electoral sphere.[3]

Representative democracy places power in the hands of representatives who are elected by the people.
Political parties often become central to this form of democracy if electoral systems require or
encourage voters to vote for political parties or for candidates associated with political parties (as
opposed to voting for individual representatives).[4] Some political theorists (including Robert Dahl,
Gregory Houston, and Ian Liebenberg) have described representative democracy as polyarchy.[5][6]

Representative democracy can be organized in different ways including both parliamentary and
presidential systems of government. Elected representatives typically form a legislature (such as a
parliament or congress), which may be composed of a single chamber (unicameral), two chambers
(bicameral), or more than two chambers (multicameral). Where two or more chambers exist, their
members are often elected in different ways.

Powers of representatives
Representatives are elected by the public, as in national elections for the national legislature.[2]
Elected representatives may hold the power to select other representatives, presidents, or other
officers of the government or of the legislature, as the prime minister in the latter case.

The power of representatives is usually curtailed by a constitution (as in a constitutional democracy or

a constitutional monarchy) or other measures to balance representative power:[7]

An independent judiciary, which may have the power to declare legislative acts unconstitutional
(e.g. constitutional court, supreme court).
The constitution may also provide for some deliberative democracy (e.g., Royal Commissions) or
direct popular measures (e.g., initiative, referendum, recall elections). However, these are not
always binding and usually require some legislative action—legal power usually remains firmly with
representatives.
In some cases, a bicameral legislature may have an "upper house" that is not directly elected, such
as the Senate of Canada, which was in turn modeled on the British House of Lords.
Some political theorists, such as Edmund Burke, believe that part of the duty of a representative is not
simply to follow the wishes of the electorate but also to use their own judgment in the exercise of their
powers, even if their views are not reflective of those of a majority of voters.[8] A representative who
[Link] 1/8
22/08/2025, 20:33 Representative democracy - Wikipedia

chooses to execute the wishes of their constituents acts as a delegate. If the representative chooses to
use their best judgment and knowledge in making decisions, even when the constituents do not fully
agree with the decision, then the representative acts as a trustee.

History
The Roman Republic was the first known state in the Western world to have a representative
government, despite taking the form of a direct government in the Roman assemblies. The Roman
model of governance would inspire many political thinkers over the centuries,[9] and today's modern
representative democracies imitate more the Roman than the Greek model, because it was a state in
which supreme power was held by the people and their elected representatives, and which had an
elected or nominated leader.[10] Representative democracy is a form of democracy in which people
vote for representatives who then vote on policy initiatives; as opposed to direct democracy, a form of
democracy in which people vote on policy initiatives directly.[11] A European medieval tradition of
selecting representatives from the various estates (classes, but not as we know them today) to
advise/control monarchs led to relatively wide familiarity with representative systems inspired by
Roman systems.

In Britain, Simon de Montfort is remembered as one of the fathers of representative government for
holding two famous parliaments.[12][13] The first, in 1258, stripped the king of unlimited authority and
the second, in 1265, included ordinary citizens from the towns.[14] Later, in the 17th century, the
Parliament of England implemented some of the ideas and systems of liberal democracy, culminating
in the Glorious Revolution and passage of the Bill of Rights 1689.[15][16] Widening of the voting
franchise took place through a series of Reform Acts in the 19th and 20th centuries.

The American Revolution led to the creation of a new Constitution of the United States in 1787, with a
national legislature based partly on direct elections of representatives every two years, and thus
responsible to the electorate for continuance in office. Senators were not directly elected by the people
until the adoption of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913. Women, men who owned no property, and
Black people, and others not originally given voting rights, in most states eventually gained the vote
through changes in state and federal law in the course of the 19th and 20th centuries. Until it was
repealed by the Fourteenth Amendment following the Civil War, the Three-Fifths Compromise gave a
disproportionate representation of slave states in the House of Representatives relative to the voters
in free states.[17][18]

In 1789, Revolutionary France adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and,
although short-lived, the National Convention was elected by all males in 1792.[19] Universal male
suffrage was re-established in France in the wake of the French Revolution of 1848.[20]

Representative democracy came into general favour particularly in post-industrial revolution nation
states where large numbers of citizens evinced interest in politics, but where technology and
population figures remained unsuited to direct democracy. Many historians credit the Reform Act
1832 with launching modern representative democracy in the United Kingdom.[21][22]

Globally, a majority of governments in the world are representative democracies, including

constitutional monarchies and republics with strong representative branches.[23]
[Link] 2/8
22/08/2025, 20:33 Representative democracy - Wikipedia

Research on representation per se

Separate but related, and very large, bodies of research in
political philosophy and social science investigate how and
how well elected representatives, such as legislators, represent
the interests or preferences of one or another constituency.
The U.S. House of Representatives, one
The empirical research shows that representative systems tend
example of representative democracy
to be biased towards the representation of more affluent
classes to the detriment of the population at
large.[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]

Criticisms
In his book Political Parties, written in 1911, Robert Michels argues that most representative systems
deteriorate towards an oligarchy or particracy. This is known as the iron law of oligarchy.[32]
Representative democracies which are stable have been analysed by Adolf Gasser and compared to the
unstable representative democracies in his book Gemeindefreiheit als Rettung Europas which was
published in 1943 and a second edition in 1947.[33] Adolf Gasser stated the following requirements for
a representative democracy in order to remain stable, unaffected by the iron law of oligarchy:

Society has to be built up from bottom to top. As a consequence, society is built up by people, who
are free and have the power to defend themselves with weapons.
These free people join or form local communities. These local communities are independent, which
includes financial independence, and they are free to determine their own rules.
Local communities join into a higher unit, e.g. a canton.
There is no hierarchical bureaucracy.
There is competition between these local communities, e.g. on services delivered or on taxes.
A drawback to this type of government is that elected officials are not required to fulfill promises
made before their election and are able to promote their own self-interests once elected, providing an
incohesive system of governance.[34] Legislators are also under scrutiny as the system of majority-won
legislators voting for issues for the large group of people fosters inequality among the
marginalized.[35]

Proponents of direct democracy criticize representative democracy due to its inherent structure. As
the fundamental basis of representative democracy is non inclusive system, in which representatives
turn into an elite class that works behind closed doors, as well as the criticizing the elector system as
being driven by a capitalistic and authoritarian system.[36][37]

The V-Dem Institute classifies electoral democracies as the bare minimum of democracies, describing
them as being governments that are "de-facto accountable to citizens through periodic elections", but
are not liberal democracies and lack further entrenched individual and minority rights beyond the
electoral sphere. Basic representative democracies may not possess a fully developed rule of law,
legislative and judicial oversight of the executive branch, protections against the "tyranny of the
majority", and only minimal fulfillment of Robert Dahl's institutional prerequisites for democracy.[3]
[Link] 3/8
22/08/2025, 20:33 Representative democracy - Wikipedia

Proposed solutions
The system of stochocracy has been proposed as an improved system compared to the system of
representative democracy, where representatives are elected. Stochocracy aims to at least reduce this
degradation by having all representatives appointed by lottery instead of by voting. Therefore, this
system is also called lottocracy. The system was proposed by the writer Roger de Sizif in 1998 in his
book La Stochocratie. Choosing officeholders by lot was also the standard practice in ancient
Athenian democracy[38] and in ancient India. The rationale behind this practice was to avoid lobbying
and electioneering by economic oligarchs.

The system of deliberative democracy is a mix between a majority-ruled system and a consensus-
based system. It allows for representative democracies or direct democracies to coexist with its system
of governance, providing an initial advantage.[39]

See also
Democracy Politics portal
Political representation
Proportional representation
Voir dire

References
1. "Victorian Electronic Democracy, Final Report – Glossary" ([Link]
45132/[Link] 28 July
2005. Archived from the original ([Link]
rt/[Link]) on 13 December 2007. Retrieved 14 December 2007.
2. Loeper, Antoine (2016). "Cross-border externalities and cooperation among representative
democracies". European Economic Review. 91: 180–208. doi:10.1016/[Link].2016.10.003 (h
ttps://[Link]/10.1016%[Link].2016.10.003). hdl:10016/25180 ([Link]
6%2F25180).
3. Lührmann, Anna; Tannenberg, Marcus; Lindberg, Staffan I. (19 March 2018). "Regimes of the
World (RoW): Opening New Avenues for the Comparative Study of Political Regimes" ([Link]
[Link]/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1214/714). Politics and Governance. 6 (1):
60–77. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i1.1214 ([Link] ISSN 2183-2463
([Link] Archived ([Link]
05/[Link] from the original
on 21 March 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
4. De Vos et al (2014). South African Constitutional Law in Context. Oxford University Press.
5. Houston, G F (2001). Public Participation in Democratic Governance in South Africa. Pretoria:
Human Sciences Research Council HSRC Press.
6. Dahl, R A (2005). "Is international democracy possible? A critical view". in Sergio Fabbrini (editor):
Democracy and Federalism in the European Union and the United States: Exploring post-national
governance. pp. 195–204 (Chapter 13). Abingdon on the Thames: Routledge.
7. "CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY" ([Link]
erials/390-constitutional-democracy). [Link]. Retrieved 18 November 2019.

[Link] 4/8
22/08/2025, 20:33 Representative democracy - Wikipedia

8. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Volume I. London: Henry G. Bohn. 1854.
pp. 446–448. "Certainly, Gentlemen, it ought to be the happiness and glory of a Representative, to
live in the strictest union, the closest correspondence, and the most unreserved communication
with his constituents. Their wishes ought to have great weight with him; their opinion, high respect;
their business, unremitted attention. It is his duty to sacrifice his repose, his pleasures, his
satisfactions, to theirs; and above all, ever, and in all cases, to prefer their interest to his own. But
his unbiassed opinion, his mature judgment, his enlightened conscience, he ought not to sacrifice
to you, to any man, or to any set of men living. These he does not derive from your pleasure; no,
nor from the Law and the Constitution. They are a trust from Providence, for the abuse of which he
is deeply answerable. Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he
betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion."
9. Livy; De Sélincourt, A.; Ogilvie, R. M.; Oakley, S. P. (2002). The early history of Rome: books I-V of
The history of Rome from its foundations ([Link]
Penguin Classics. p. 34. ISBN 0-14-044809-8.
10. Watson, 2005, p. 271
11. Budge, Ian (2001). "Direct democracy" ([Link]
A224). In Clarke, Paul A.B.; Foweraker, Joe (eds.). Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Taylor &
Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-19396-2.
12. Jobson, Adrian (2012). The First English Revolution: Simon de Montfort, Henry III and the Barons'
War ([Link] Bloomsbury. pp. 173–4. ISBN 978-1-
84725-226-5.
13. "Simon de Montfort: The turning point for democracy that gets overlooked" ([Link]
news/magazine-30849472). BBC. 19 January 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2015; "The January
Parliament and how it defined Britain" ([Link]
[Link]). The Telegraph. 20 January 2015. Archived (http
s://[Link]/archive/20220111/[Link]
[Link]) from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved
28 January 2015.
14. Norgate, Kate (1894). "Montfort, Simon of (1208?-1265)" ([Link]
_of_National_Biography,_1885-1900/Montfort,_Simon_of_(1208%3F-1265)). In Lee, Sidney (ed.).
Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 38. London: Smith, Elder & Co.
15. Kopstein, Jeffrey; Lichbach, Mark; Hanson, Stephen E., eds. (2014). Comparative Politics:
Interests, Identities, and Institutions in a Changing Global Order ([Link]
d=L2jwAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA38) (4, revised ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 37–9. ISBN 978-
1139991384. "Britain pioneered the system of liberal democracy that has now spread in one form
or another to most of the world's countries"

[Link] 5/8
22/08/2025, 20:33 Representative democracy - Wikipedia

16. "Constitutionalism: America & Beyond" ([Link]

[Link]/infousa/zhtw/DOCS/Demopaper/[Link]). Bureau of International Information
Programs (IIP), U.S. Department of State. Archived from the original ([Link]
zhtw/DOCS/Demopaper/[Link]) on 24 October 2014. Retrieved 30 October 2014. "The
earliest, and perhaps greatest, victory for liberalism was achieved in England. The rising
commercial class that had supported the Tudor monarchy in the 16th century led the revolutionary
battle in the 17th and succeeded in establishing the supremacy of Parliament and, eventually, of
the House of Commons. What emerged as the distinctive feature of modern constitutionalism was
not the insistence on the idea that the king is subject to the law (although this concept is an
essential attribute of all constitutionalism). This notion was already well established in the Middle
Ages. What was distinctive was the establishment of effective means of political control whereby
the rule of law might be enforced. Modern constitutionalism was born with the political requirement
that representative government depended upon the consent of citizen subjects... However, as can
be seen through provisions in the 1689 Bill of Rights, the English Revolution was fought not just to
protect the rights of property (in the narrow sense) but to establish those liberties which liberals
believed essential to human dignity and moral worth. The "rights of man" enumerated in the
English Bill of Rights gradually were proclaimed beyond the boundaries of England, notably in the
American Declaration of Independence of 1776 and in the French Declaration of the Rights of Man
in 1789."
17. "We Hold These Truths to be Self-evident;" An Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Roots of Racism &
slavery in America Kenneth N. Addison; Introduction P. xxii
18. "Expansion of Rights and Liberties" ([Link]
m_13.html). National Archives. 30 October 2015. Retrieved 27 December 2015.
19. "The French Revolution II" ([Link]
empel/courses/wc2/lectures/[Link]). [Link]. Archived from the original ([Link]
[Link]/~grempel/courses/wc2/lectures/[Link]) on 27 August 2008. Retrieved 22 August
2010.
20. French National Assembly. "1848 " Désormais le bulletin de vote doit remplacer le fusil " " ([Link]
[Link]/histoire/suffrage_universel/[Link]) (in French). Retrieved
26 September 2009.
21. A. Ricardo López; Barbara Weinstein (2012). The Making of the Middle Class: Toward a
Transnational History ([Link] Duke UP.
p. 58. ISBN 978-0822351290.
22. Eric J. Evans, The Forging of the Modern State: Early Industrial Britain, 1783–1870 (2nd ed. 1996)
p. 229
23. Roser, Max (15 March 2013). "Democracy" ([Link] Our World in
Data.
24. Jacobs, Lawrence R.; Page, Benjamin I. (February 2005). "Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?".
American Political Science Review. 99 (1): 107–123. doi:10.1017/S000305540505152X ([Link]
[Link]/10.1017%2FS000305540505152X). S2CID 154481971 ([Link]
sID:154481971).
25. Bernauer, Julian; Giger, Nathalie; Rosset, Jan (January 2015). "Mind the gap: Do proportional
electoral systems foster a more equal representation of women and men, poor and rich?".
International Political Science Review. 36 (1): 78–98. doi:10.1177/0192512113498830 ([Link]
rg/10.1177%2F0192512113498830). S2CID 145633250 ([Link]
145633250).
26. Gilens, Martin; Page, Benjamin I. (September 2014). "Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites,
Interest Groups, and Average Citizens" ([Link]
Perspectives on Politics. 12 (3): 564–581. doi:10.1017/S1537592714001595 ([Link]
7%2FS1537592714001595).

[Link] 6/8
22/08/2025, 20:33 Representative democracy - Wikipedia

27. Carnes, Nicholas (2013). White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy
Making. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-08728-3.
28. Carnes, Nicholas; Lupu, Noam (January 2015). "Rethinking the Comparative Perspective on Class
and Representation: Evidence from Latin America" ([Link]
ethinking_the_Comparative_Perspective_on_Class_and_Representation_Evidence_from_Latin_A
merica/26125930). American Journal of Political Science. 59 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1111/ajps.12112 (htt
ps://[Link]/10.1111%2Fajps.12112).
29. Giger, Nathalie; Rosset, Jan; Bernauer, Julian (April 2012). "The Poor Political Representation of
the Poor in a Comparative Perspective". Representation. 48 (1): 47–61.
doi:10.1080/00344893.2012.653238 ([Link]
S2CID 154081733 ([Link]
30. Peters, Yvette; Ensink, Sander J. (4 May 2015). "Differential Responsiveness in Europe: The
Effects of Preference Difference and Electoral Participation" ([Link]
2014.973260). West European Politics. 38 (3): 577–600. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.973260 (http
s://[Link]/10.1080%2F01402382.2014.973260). S2CID 153452076 ([Link]
g/CorpusID:153452076).
31. Schakel, Wouter; Burgoon, Brian; Hakhverdian, Armen (March 2020). "Real but Unequal
Representation in Welfare State Reform" ([Link] Politics
& Society. 48 (1): 131–163. doi:10.1177/0032329219897984 ([Link]
19897984). hdl:1887/138869 ([Link] S2CID 214235967 (https://
[Link]/CorpusID:214235967).
32. Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie. Untersuchungen über die
oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens (1911, 1925; 1970). Translated as Sociologia del
partito politico nella democrazia moderna : studi sulle tendenze oligarchiche degli aggregati politici,
from the German original by Dr. Alfredo Polledro, revised and expanded (1912). Translated, from
the Italian, by Eden and Cedar Paul as Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical
Tendencies of Modern Democracy'" (Hearst's International Library Co., 1915; Free Press, 1949;
Dover Publications, 1959); republished with an introduction by Seymour Martin Lipset (Crowell-
Collier, 1962; Transaction Publishers, 1999, ISBN 0-7658-0469-7); translated in French by S.
Jankélévitch, Les partis politiques. Essai sur les tendances oligarchiques des démocraties,
Brussels, Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, 2009 (ISBN 978-2-8004-1443-0).
33. Gemeindefreiheit als Rettung Europas. Grundlinien einer ethischen Geschichtsauffassung. Verlag
Bücherfreunde, Basel 1947. In 1983 republished under: "Gemeindefreiheit – kommunale
Selbstverwaltung" (Adolf Gasser/Franz-Ludwig Knemeyer), in de reeks "Studien zur Soziologie",
Nymphenburger, München, 1983.
34. Sørensen, Eva (25 April 2016). "Enhancing policy innovation by redesigning representative
democracy" ([Link]
Policy & Politics. 44 (2): 155–170. doi:10.1332/030557315X14399997475941 ([Link]
32%2F030557315X14399997475941). S2CID 156556922 ([Link]
D:156556922). ProQuest 1948833814 ([Link]
35. Thaa, Winfried (3 May 2016). "Issues and images – new sources of inequality in current
representative democracy". Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 19 (3):
357–375. doi:10.1080/13698230.2016.1144859 ([Link]
59). S2CID 147669709 ([Link]
36. Razsa, Maple; Kurnik, Andrej (May 2012). "The Occupy Movement in Žižek's hometown: Direct
democracy and a politics of becoming: The Occupy Movement in Žižek's hometown". American
Ethnologist. 39 (2): 238–258. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01361.x ([Link]
548-1425.2012.01361.x).
37. Heckert, Jamie (2010). "Anarchist roots & routes" ([Link]
[Link]) (PDF). European Journal of Ecopsychology. 1: 19–36.

[Link] 7/8
22/08/2025, 20:33 Representative democracy - Wikipedia

38. "1,5". Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece. Josiah Ober, Robert Wallace, Paul Cartledge,
Cynthia Farrar (1st ed.). 15 October 2008. pp. 17, 105. ISBN 978-0520258099.
39. Bohman, James (1997). Deliberative Democracy ([Link]
ek_CEE/Szakirodalom/Deliberat%C3%ADv%20demokrácia/deliberative%20democracy%20book.p
df#page=72) (PDF). MIT Press.

Retrieved from "[Link]

[Link] 8/8