0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views2 pages

Benchmarking Mobile Robot Controllers

Heat Transfer

Uploaded by

bonmoc1310
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views2 pages

Benchmarking Mobile Robot Controllers

Heat Transfer

Uploaded by

bonmoc1310
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Assignment: Benchmarking Control Algorithms in

rcognita-edu

Objective
You are to implement and compare three control strategies for trajectory tracking of a mobile
robot:

1. Kinematic (Nominal) Controller

2. Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR)

3. Model Predictive Control (MPC)

Work within the simulation framework provided in the GitHub repository:

[Link]

Project Structure and Tasks


1. [Link]
Define your system model, e.g. for a differential-drive robot. You may reuse or adapt models
from the lecture notebooks.

2. [Link]
Complete or implement the following controllers:

Kinematic Controller: Implement from scratch using the lecture notebooks. Your implemen-
tation should compute closed-form control law using polar coordinates and gains κρ , κα , κβ .

LQR Controller: Implement discrete-time LQR using DARE. Use [Link] discrete are
to compute the gain K and apply control uk = −Kxk .

MPC Controller: You only need to define the cost function (stage and terminal). The opti-
mization infrastructure is already implemented.

Benchmarking and Experiments


Run simulations using each controller and compare their performance. Later, these will be
deployed on real TurtleBots.

1
Experiment A: Kinematic Controller
• Test three sets of gain parameters κρ , κα , κβ .
• For each run, record:
– Robot trajectory vs reference
– Tracking error over time
– Control inputs v, ω over time
• Discuss stability and convergence.

Experiment B: LQR Controller


• Vary cost matrices Q, R.
• Test performance under limited input saturation (simulate actuator limits).
• Highlight where LQR fails to stabilize or track.

Experiment C: MPC Controller


• Vary:
– Horizon length N
– Weight matrices Q, R, Qf
– Terminal cost on/off
• Evaluate:
– Tracking performance
– Total accumulated cost
– Effect of long vs short horizon

Visualization and Reporting


For each controller, provide:
• 2D trajectory plot
• Time plots of tracking error
• Time plots of control inputs
• Accumulated cost comparison (kinematic, LQR, MPC)
Ensure that initial conditions and reference trajectory are consistent across all runs.

Submission and Integration


This is a two-phase assignment:
A. Simulation Phase: Complete implementation and benchmarking in the simulator.
B. Hardware Phase: Integrate and test controllers with real TurtleBot3.
You are expected to follow best practices in code structure and documentation. Submit via
Git pull request. Report submit via iLearn.

You might also like