0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views10 pages

Traffic Engineering Formulas and Calculations

The document covers key formulas and values in road traffic engineering, including calculations for stopping sight distance (SSD), overtaking sight distance (OSD), and minimum radius for curves. It also addresses traffic surveys, intelligent transport systems, parking studies, and street lighting. Each section includes problems with step-by-step solutions and results for practical applications in traffic engineering design.

Uploaded by

cpruthvi52
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views10 pages

Traffic Engineering Formulas and Calculations

The document covers key formulas and values in road traffic engineering, including calculations for stopping sight distance (SSD), overtaking sight distance (OSD), and minimum radius for curves. It also addresses traffic surveys, intelligent transport systems, parking studies, and street lighting. Each section includes problems with step-by-step solutions and results for practical applications in traffic engineering design.

Uploaded by

cpruthvi52
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Road Traffic Engineering – Numerical & Design (Blue Theme)

Unit I – Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering


Key Formulas & Values
Key Formula / Value Meaning / Notes

SSD = V·t + V²/(2·g·f ± 2·g·G) Use +G for upgrades, –G for downgrades; V in m/s, g=9.81 m

OSD (quick) ≈ 3·V·t_c + 2·V²/a t_c ≈ 2.5 s, a ≈ 0.67 m/s² (passenger car)

e + f_lat = V²/(225·R) V in km/h, R in m; e (superelevation) ≤ 0.07 (typical design lim

Typical values t = 2.5 s; f (dry) = 0.36–0.40; f_lat(max)=0.15

Problem 1. Compute SSD for V=80 km/h on level road using t=2.5 s and f=0.36.
[FORMULA] SSD = V·t + V²/(2·g·f)
Where V = speed (m/s), t = reaction time (s), g = 9.81 m/s², f = longitudinal friction.

Step 1: Convert V: 80×1000/3600 = 22.22 m/s


Step 2: Lag distance = 22.22×2.5 = 55.55 m
Step 3: Braking distance = 22.22² / (2×9.81×0.36) = 69.87 m
Step 4: SSD = 55.55 + 69.87
[TIP] Use f=0.36 from reference table for dry pavement.

Result: SSD ≈ 125 m

Problem 2. Estimate OSD for V=80 km/h with a=0.67 m/s² and clearance t_c=2.5 s.
[FORMULA] OSD ≈ 3·V·t_c + 2·V²/a
V in m/s, a = overtaking acceleration, t_c = clearance interval.

Step 1: V = 22.22 m/s


Step 2: 3·V·t_c = 3×22.22×2.5 = 166.65 m
Step 3: 2·V²/a = 2×(22.22²)/0.67 ≈ 737.6 m
Step 4: Sum distances
[CAUTION] OSD increases sharply if gradients or slow lead vehicles are present.

Result: OSD ≈ 905 m

Problem 3. Find minimum radius for V=65 km/h with e=0.07 and f_lat=0.15.
[FORMULA] e + f_lat = V²/(225·R) ⇒ R = V² / [225·(e+f_lat)]
e = superelevation (ratio), f_lat = lateral friction, R in metres.

Step 1: Compute denominator: e+f_lat = 0.22


Step 2: R = 65² / (225×0.22) = 4225 / 49.5
[TIP] If R is very small, check comfort and sight distance constraints.

Result: R ≈ 85 m

Page 1
Road Traffic Engineering – Numerical & Design (Blue Theme)

Problem 4. SSD for V=60 km/h on +3% upgrade (t=2.5 s, f=0.36).


[FORMULA] SSD = V·t + V² / [2·g·(f+G)]
G = grade (decimal, + for upgrade).

Step 1: V=16.67 m/s


Step 2: Lag = 16.67×2.5 = 41.7 m
Step 3: Braking = 16.67² / (2×9.81×(0.36+0.03)) ≈ 36.4 m
Step 4: SSD = 41.7 + 36.4
Result: SSD ≈ 78 m

Problem 5. Safe speed on a curve of R=200 m with e=7% and f_lat=0.15.


[FORMULA] V = √[225·R·(e+f_lat)]
V in km/h, R in m.

Step 1: e+f_lat = 0.22


Step 2: V = √(225×200×0.22) = √9900
Result: V ≈ 100 km/h

Problem 6. Check if 480 m sight distance allows overtaking at 50 km/h.


[FORMULA] OSD (50 km/h) ≈ 450–500 m (rule-of-thumb with standard assumptions).
Use quick check; detailed method may vary slightly.

Step 1: Available = 480 m vs. required ≈ 450–500 m


Result: Adequate for 50 km/h

Problem 7. Braking distance from 90 km/h on level road with f=0.36.


[FORMULA] BD = V²/(2·g·f)
BD = braking distance only (excludes reaction).

Step 1: V = 25 m/s
Step 2: BD = 25² / (2×9.81×0.36) ≈ 88.6 m
Result: ≈ 89 m

Problem 8. Lag distance at 70 km/h with t=2.5 s.


Step 1: V = 19.44 m/s
Step 2: Lag = V·t = 19.44×2.5 = 48.6 m
Result: ≈ 49 m

Problem 9. Required superelevation for V=80 km/h, R=250 m (limit f_lat=0.15).


[FORMULA] e = V²/(225·R) − f_lat
Step 1: Compute V²/(225·R) = 6400/(225×250) ≈ 0.114
Step 2: e = 0.114 − 0.15 = −0.036 → friction suffices; provide min e for drainage
[CAUTION] Adopt minimum e (≈2%) even if negative, to ensure drainage and consistency.

Result: Provide e ≈ 0.02

Problem 10. Flow from average headway 2.5 s.


[FORMULA] q = 3600 / headway
Step 1: q = 3600 / 2.5 = 1440 veh/h
Result: 1440 veh/h

Page 2
Road Traffic Engineering – Numerical & Design (Blue Theme)

Unit II – Traffic Surveys and Intelligent Transport System


Key Formulas & Values
Key Formula / Value Meaning / Notes

PCU_total = Σ(Flow_i × PCU_i) Typical PCU: car 1.0, 2W 0.5, bus 3.0 (urban arterials)

V_space = n / Σ(1/v_i) Harmonic mean for space mean speed

Delay (uniform) d = [0.5·C·(1−g/C)²]/(1−X) Webster uniform delay (approx), X=v/c

Capacity = s × (g/C) s ≈ 1800 pcphpl (adjust 1500–2000)

Problem 1. Convert 600 cars, 800 2W, 60 buses per hour to PCU.
Step 1: PCU = 600×1.0 + 800×0.5 + 60×3.0 = 1180 pcph
Result: 1180 pcph

Problem 2. Compute space mean speed from speeds 40, 45, 60, 55, 50 km/h.
[FORMULA] V_space = n / Σ(1/v_i)
Use speeds in consistent units (km/h).

Step 1: Σ(1/v) ≈ 0.1021; n=5


Step 2: V_space ≈ 5 / 0.1021 ≈ 49 km/h
Result: ≈ 49 km/h

Problem 3. Find 85th percentile from spot speeds: 32, 35, 38, 40, 42, 45, 46, 48, 52, 55 km/h.
Step 1: Ranked sample; position = 0.85×(n+1)=9.35
Step 2: Interpolate between 52 and 55: 52 + 0.35×3 = 53.05
Result: ≈ 53 km/h

Problem 4. Given time mean 52 km/h and C_v=0.2, find space mean speed.
[FORMULA] V_t = V_s (1 + C_v²)
Thus V_s = V_t /(1+C_v²).

Step 1: V_s = 52 / 1.04 = 50 km/h


Result: ≈ 50 km/h

Problem 5. Journey speed and running speed on 5 km link: total 10 min incl. 2.5 min stopped
delay.
Step 1: Journey speed = 5 / (10/60) = 30 km/h
Step 2: Running speed = 5 / (7.5/60) = 40 km/h
Result: Journey 30 km/h; Running 40 km/h

Problem 6. Signal capacity: s=1800 pcphpl, g=30 s, C=90 s.


[FORMULA] Capacity = s × (g/C)
Step 1: Capacity = 1800×(30/90)=600 pcph
Result: 600 pcph

Page 3
Road Traffic Engineering – Numerical & Design (Blue Theme)

Problem 7. Degree of saturation for demand 750 pcph, capacity 600 pcph.
[FORMULA] X = v/c
Step 1: X = 750/600 = 1.25
[CAUTION] X>1 indicates oversaturation; expect growing queues.

Result: X = 1.25 (oversaturated)

Problem 8. O–D balancing with growth: P=1200→×1.10; A=1300→×1.05. Balance totals.


Step 1: P' = 1320; A' = 1365
Step 2: Scaling A by BF = 1320/1365 = 0.967 → A_bal = 1320
Result: Balanced totals: P=1320, A=1320

Problem 9. Uniform delay with X=0.85, C=100 s, g/C=0.4.


[FORMULA] d = [0.5·C·(1−g/C)²]/(1−X)
Step 1: Numerator = 0.5×100×0.6² = 18 s
Step 2: Denominator = 0.15 → d = 120 s/veh
Result: ≈ 120 s/veh

Problem 10. Reliability index change: σ from 6→3 min on 30-min trip.
Step 1: RI_before = 6/30 = 0.20; RI_after = 3/30 = 0.10
Result: Reliability index halves to 0.10

Page 4
Road Traffic Engineering – Numerical & Design (Blue Theme)

Unit III – Parking Studies


Key Formulas & Values
Key Formula / Value Meaning / Notes

Parking Load = Σ(vehicle-hours) Area under accumulation-time curve

Turnover = Volume / Duration Vehicles using a space per hour

Index (%) = 100 × (Volume / Capacity) Utilization indicator

Standard bay sizes Car 2.5×5.0 m; 2W 1.0×2.0 m; Bus 3.75×12 m

Problem 1. Block with 60 spaces, 360 cars in 8 h, load 240 veh·h. Find turnover and avg
duration.
Step 1: Turnover = 360/8 = 45 veh/h
Step 2: Avg duration = 240/360 = 0.667 h = 40 min
Result: Turnover 45 veh/h; Avg stay 40 min

Problem 2. Parking Index at peak with 54 of 60 spaces occupied.


[FORMULA] Index = 100 × (Occ / Capacity)
Step 1: Index = (54/60)×100 = 90%
Result: 90%

Problem 3. Parallel parking on 120 m curb with 2.5 m end clearances and 6.0 m per car.
Step 1: Usable = 120 − 5 = 115 m
Step 2: Bays = ■115/6■ = 19
Result: 19 cars

Problem 4. 45° angle parking; effective curb pitch ~3.6 m. Bays on 90 m?


Step 1: Bays = ■90/3.6■ = 25
Result: ≈ 25 bays

Problem 5. Lot needs 120 car bays; add 25% circulation and 10% landscaping. Area/bay =
12.5 m².
Step 1: Bay carpet = 120×12.5 = 1500 m²
Step 2: With circulation = 1875 m²; with landscaping = 2062.5 m²
Result: ≈ 2065 m² land

Problem 6. Revenue: 48 average occupied (of 60) for 10 h at ■30/h.


Step 1: Veh·h = 48×10 = 480
Step 2: Revenue = 480×30 = ■14,400
Result: ■14,400/day

Problem 7. Peak accumulation from arrivals [15,18,12,10] and departures [5,8,12,6] every 15
min; initial 20.
Step 1: Net changes: +10, +10, 0, +4 → cumulative +24
Step 2: Occupancy: 20→30→40→40→44
Result: Peak = 44 vehicles

Page 5
Road Traffic Engineering – Numerical & Design (Blue Theme)

Problem 8. Curb redesign: length per car reduces 6.0→5.5 m on 115 m usable.
Step 1: Old bays = 19; New bays = ■115/5.5■ = 20
Result: Gain = 1 car

Problem 9. Two-wheeler zone capacity 200 bikes; 30% aisles; bay 1.0×2.0 m.
Step 1: Carpet = 200×2 = 400 m²; with aisles = ×1.30 = 520 m²
Result: ≈ 520 m²

Problem 10. Shared parking: office 100 (day), cinema 120 (evening), 30% overlap 6–7 pm. Max
combined demand?
Step 1: Overlap hour demand ≈ 0.7×100 + 0.7×120 + 0.3×(100+120) = 70+84+66 = 220
Result: ≈ 220 spaces at peak overlap

Page 6
Road Traffic Engineering – Numerical & Design (Blue Theme)

Unit IV – Street Lighting and Arboriculture


Key Formulas & Values
Key Formula / Value Meaning / Notes

E_av = (Φ · UF · MF) / (S · W) Average illuminance (lux); Φ in lumens, W in m

S = (Φ · UF · MF) / (E_av · W) Spacing; check S ≤ 3H (mounting height)

Typical UF≈0.4, MF≈0.75, E_main≈30 lux, E_res≈10–15 lux

Problem 1. Spacing for 12 m wide road; Φ=20,000 lm, UF=0.40, MF=0.75, E_av=30 lux (single
side).
[FORMULA] S = (Φ·UF·MF)/(E·W)
Φ lumens, UF utilization, MF maintenance, E target lux, W width.

Step 1: S = (20000×0.40×0.75)/(30×12) = 6000/360 = 16.7 m


Step 2: 3H check: if H≈9 m, 3H=27 m → OK
Result: Provide spacing ≈ 16–17 m

Problem 2. If mounting height increases to 12 m, what is 3H spacing limit?


Step 1: 3H = 36 m
Result: S ≤ 36 m

Problem 3. Opposite-side lighting on 14 m road; same lamps; target E_av=25 lux. Spacing per
side?
[FORMULA] S = (Φ·UF·MF)/(E·W_eff)
Use W_eff ≈ W/2 = 7 m when two rows share.

Step 1: S = (20000×0.40×0.75)/(25×7) = 6000/175 = 34.3 m


Result: ≈ 34 m per side

Problem 4. Energy for 50 poles, 120 W each, 11 h/night, 30 days.


Step 1: Daily kWh = 50×0.12×11 = 66 kWh
Step 2: Monthly ≈ 66×30 = 1980 kWh
Result: ≈ 1980 kWh/month

Problem 5. Visual angle to luminaire: h=9 m, d=30 m ahead (θ≈arctan(h/d)).


Step 1: θ ≈ arctan(9/30) ≈ 16.7°
Step 2: Angles >15° risk discomfort glare.
Result: θ ≈ 16.7°

Problem 6. Tree spacing with 6 m canopy diameter for near-continuous shade.


Step 1: Use 0.8–1.0× canopy for spacing → 5–6 m
Result: Adopt ≈ 5–6 m

Problem 7. Setback: keep trunk ≥1.0 m from curb; sidewalk width 2.0 m; shy distance 0.5 m.
Step 1: Provide ≥1.0 m from curb within sidewalk band; maintain pedestrian clear zone.
Result: Setback ≥ 1.0 m

Page 7
Road Traffic Engineering – Numerical & Design (Blue Theme)

Problem 8. Maintained illuminance if initial 32 lux and MF=0.75.


[FORMULA] E_maint = E_initial × MF
Step 1: E_maint = 32×0.75 = 24 lux
Result: 24 lux

Problem 9. Poles needed on 1.2 km with S=30 m (staggered).


Step 1: N ≈ 1200/30 = 40; allow end effects → 40–42
Result: ≈ 40–42 poles

Problem 10. MF planning: if MF degrades 0.8→0.6 in 4 years, what MF at mid-life?


Step 1: Use average or design to worst; midpoint ~ (0.8+0.6)/2 = 0.7
Result: Use MF ≈ 0.7

Page 8
Road Traffic Engineering – Numerical & Design (Blue Theme)

Unit V – Road Accident Studies


Key Formulas & Values
Key Formula / Value Meaning / Notes

Rate (per MVkm) = (Crashes × 10^6)/(AADT × 365 × L_km) Exposure-based comparison

% change = (After−Before)/Before ×100 Before–After analysis

DSD ≈ 2.5 × SSD Rule-of-thumb for complex decisions

Problem 1. Accident rate for 24 crashes/year on 2 km link, AADT=18,000 veh/day.


[FORMULA] Rate = (Crashes × 10^6) / (AADT×365×L)
Step 1: Exposure = 18000×365×2 = 13.14×10^6 veh·km
Step 2: Rate = 24 / 13.14 ≈ 1.83 crashes/MVkm
Result: ≈ 1.8 crashes per MVkm

Problem 2. Out of 120 crashes: 6 fatal, 18 grievous, 36 minor, 60 PDO. Find fatality share &
severity index.
Step 1: Fatality share = 6/120 = 5%
Step 2: Severity index = (6/120)×100 = 5
Result: 5% share; 5 fatalities per 100 crashes

Problem 3. Identify black spot if µ=2.2, σ=0.6 with site rates: 3.2, 1.5, 2.0.
Step 1: Threshold = µ+σ = 2.8
Step 2: Only 3.2 exceeds → flagged
Result: Site with 3.2 is black spot

Problem 4. Before–After: 30→21 crashes.


[FORMULA] %∆ = (After−Before)/Before ×100
Step 1: %∆ = (21−30)/30 ×100 = −30%
Result: 30% reduction

Problem 5. Pedestrian conflicts double with doubled p-volume from 12/h.


Step 1: Conflicts ≈ 24/h (linear approximation)
Result: ≈ 24 conflicts/h

Problem 6. Wet braking distance from 60 km/h with f=0.30.


[FORMULA] BD = V²/(2·g·f)
Step 1: V=16.67 m/s; BD = 16.67²/(2×9.81×0.30) ≈ 47.2 m
Result: ≈ 47 m

Problem 7. If SSD at 70 km/h ≈ 95 m, advise DSD.


Step 1: DSD ≈ 2.5×SSD ≈ 2.5×95 = 238 m
Result: ≈ 240 m

Page 9
Road Traffic Engineering – Numerical & Design (Blue Theme)

Problem 8. Survival probability drops 5% per minute after 10 min; at 20 min vs 10 min?
Step 1: Relative survival ≈ 50% of the 10-min level
Result: ≈ 50%

Problem 9. Head-on between identical cars at 50 km/h each; energy per car if m=1200 kg.
[FORMULA] KE = 0.5·m·v² (per car)
Step 1: v=13.89 m/s; KE ≈ 0.5×1200×13.89² ≈ 1.16×10^5 J
Result: ≈ 1.16×10^5 J per car

Problem 10. Share of crossing conflicts given: LT 8, RT 12, Crossing 20, Rear-end 15.
Step 1: Total = 55; Crossing% = 20/55 ≈ 36.4%
Result: ≈ 36%

Page 10

You might also like